Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A18: Witness has no personal knowledge of Shawn’s alleged habitual alcoholism
Q20: Leading question, presupposes that defendant is in a state or condition during the time of the
incident
A20: Lacks personal knowledge, as it was already established that defendant stayed in his car for most
of the time of the incident.
A21: Lacks personal knowledge based on the previous ground.
Q27: Irrelevant.
Q32: Leading.
A13: Witness has no personal knowledge, since she heard the loud sound first before going down to
see what had happened.
Objections to the Judicial Affidavit of Angel (referred to as Arnel in his own JA)
Santos:
Personal circumstance states that his name is Angel Santos but referred to as Arnel Santos in his
statements.
A10: Witness has no personal knowledge as to the wife and other neighbors.
A11: Not responsive and assumes facts not in evidence (pertaining to the award)
A15: Not responsive and assumes facts not in evidence, since what was what he felt at the time of
the incident (which is also irrelevant) but answered what the Spouses Gonzaga might have felt.
A11: It is a narrative answer and the second part is not responsive to the question. The witness had
already answered the question with a no, further narration of the witness’ answers is not required.