number), indicating an untitled Improvisation Rite by Christopher Hobbs.
It was also published as the second of Two Compositions, 21 May 1969, as part of his Word Pieces collection (Hobbs 1972, 47). The text of CH27 is divided by strokes (as when verse is set within prose) in Nature Study Notes, but it is set as separate lines (as poetry) in Word Pieces with the indication “Back to the beginning” at the end. In the poster for the first Scratch Orchestra concert, at Hampstead Town Hall on 1 November 1969 (which Hobbs, as the youngest member, presented), the lines of the text (named here as “Second Piece”) were set as spokes radiating from a central axis, accentuating its cyclical form. Under Scratch Orchestra genre types, Two Compositions (2) is a composition (“performable by the orchestra”) (Cardew 1969, 619). Its happy performances would tend to be interactive ones, its alternative responses observed by all. Other provisions in Scratch Orchestra compositions include preventing harm to instruments, the performance space or performers; directions for physical placement (like Balkan Sobranie); performer hierarchy or equality (is there a leader to be followed, or is there a provision to ensure each player equal solo time?); various types of game play; manipulation of perceived time; and so on. Two Compositions (2) is nearly identical to CH27. CH27 is another genre type, an Improvisation Rite (“not a musical composition”) (Cardew 1969, 619). Ideally, an Improvisation Rite describes a situation to facilitate improvisa- tion, not an instruction for sound. The differences between Improvisation Rites and Compositions can be almost imperceptible. The placement of Two Compositions (2) and CH27 (in a collection of compositions and a collection of Improvisation Rites) alone determines their function. As an Improvisation Rite, CH27 does not specify instrumentation or pitch structure. Hobbs never determines the action “play,” so the performer might play games; he does not specify sound, only vision, so a happy performance could be silent; the “some- one” who may return the gaze may be unaware that CH27 is being performed by the subject player, so a happy performance could be solo and covert. Just as a single piece can have two contextual and generic uses, pieces within a single genre may look completely different. Although Nature Study Notes was intended as a collection of Improvisation Rites, there are a num- ber of entries in this collection that can only be described as compositional. Tim Mitchell’s Tube Train Rite (TMTTR38; in Cardew, ed. 1969, 6) presents a set of parallel linear graphics and reads, “mark out a journey (inwardly/ outwardly/spatially). Make it.” Like Young’s grasshoppers, there is nothing regarding sound, so Tube Train Rite is a true Improvisation Rite. The title refers to the London Underground. References, or “ancestry,” can appear in the score or in supplementary authorial notes that appear at the end of Nature Study Notes (Cardew, ed. 1969, 12–15). In his notes (p. 15), Mitchell asserted Tube Train Rite’s ancestry to be Cardew’s graphic score Treatise, most likely due to its linear pattern and graphics. He also mentions William Caxton, an early English printer, and two steam engine pioneers (James Watt, George Stephenson [spelled “Stevenson” in the notes]). Nature Study Notes references included literature, games, laws, other rites and pieces by other experimen- talists (Mitchell’s reference to Treatise), pop music or (rather sarcastically) the