You are on page 1of 16

QRM - Session 3

Research Questions and Ethical Concerns


Course structure
1. Introduction, paradigms, and research methods
2. Designs and evaluation criteria
3. Research questions and ethical concerns
4. Paper project development
5. Interviews and transcriptions
6. Paper project development
7. Observation and field notes
8. Paper project development
9. Documents: Textual and visual
10. Paper project development
11. Analysis and reporting
12. Paper project development
13. Presentations I
14. Presentations II

Fall 2020 Prof. Dr. Olivier Berthod 77


Ethical issues: Consent
>People can refuse to take surveys
>People can try and avoid leaving digital traces
>But people cannot always refuse to be part of data
collection during fieldwork
>Central questions: Should you collect their
consent? Should you inform them about your
actual purpose?

Fall 2020 Prof. Dr. Olivier Berthod 78


Ethical issues: Covert research
> Covert research / deceptive approaches: Many
associations condemn such approaches
> And yet: Sociologist Richard Leo (1997) disguised his
liberal political and social views, instead feigning
conservative beliefs, to build trust with police and
thereby gain admission to interrogation rooms;
Festinger and colleagues (1956) infiltrated a
doomsday cult by lying about his profession and
pretending to believe in the cult’s prophecies;
Sociologist Humphreys (1970) pretended to be gay to
gather data for his dissertation on homosexual
encounters in public parks

Fall 2020 Prof. Dr. Olivier Berthod 79


Open/Covert: An open debate
Should researchers inform participants in full,

or…

… should they use all opportunities to collect data?

Fall 2020 Prof. Dr. Olivier Berthod 80


Situation
>You study non-verbal interactions between
drivers at a particular intersection
>How do you collect consent?
>How do you guarantee ethical standards?

Fall 2020 Prof. Dr. Olivier Berthod 81


Ethical issues: Confidentiality
>Grant anonymity to participants
>Changes names of persons and places as long as
it does not harm contextuality
>Sometimes, participants wish to “own” their story
>Sometimes, anonymity is a matter of safety for
participants

Fall 2020 Prof. Dr. Olivier Berthod 82


Ethical issues: Retributions
>“Why should we let you in?”
>“What do I get from it?”
>Data collection and incentives
>Vouchers for participation in surveys is frequent
>At the same time: How does this influence
answers and willingness to share?
>Try and avoid offering something valuable
>Offer to share your findings, or to administer an
instrument to diagnose something, etc.
Fall 2020 Prof. Dr. Olivier Berthod 83
Case by case
>Research with children
>Research with vulnerable people
>Conflicts of interest
>Financial issues and funding
>Research that involves risk
>…

Fall 2020 Prof. Dr. Olivier Berthod 84


Where to start?
>Huge differences between disciplines!!
>Go through the code(s) of ethics of your discipline’s
main association(s)
>Go through your institution’s procedures
(when do you need formal approval and what do you
need to do to get it?)
>Go through your association’s criteria and try and
make a case for your procedures and their
compliance
>If you are not sure about your complying: Look for
expert advice

Fall 2020 Prof. Dr. Olivier Berthod 85


Codes of ethics, a selection
>Anthropology:
http://ethics.americananthro.org/category/statement/
>Sociology:
https://www.asanet.org/code-ethics
>Political science:
https://www.apsanet.org/portals/54/Files/Publications/A
PSAEthicsGuide2012.pdf
>Psychology:
https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/
>Management research:
https://aom.org/about-aom/governance/ethics/code-of-
ethics
>Economics:
https://www.aeaweb.org/about-aea/code-of-conduct
Fall 2020 Prof. Dr. Olivier Berthod 86
This week’s reading
>What are your impressions?
>Why did the review committee ask they conduct
fieldwork in public or semi-public spaces?
>What is the central question raised by the
authors?
>(Why) does this question make sense?

Fall 2020 Prof. Dr. Olivier Berthod 87


Applying the concepts
>Consent: Did they collect consent? Why?
>Covertness:
>How did they motivate their position in the community
they study?
>What did they do to blend in?
>What couldn’t they hide?
>Confidentiality: Was it granted to the people
studied?
>Retributions of any sort?
>Other dimensions you think are important to take
into account?
Fall 2020 Prof. Dr. Olivier Berthod 88
Exercise
>Based on a real scenario from our textbook:
>You plan to conduct research on male prostitution.
>What ethical issues are you likely to encounter?
>How could you handle them?

Fall 2020 Prof. Dr. Olivier Berthod 89


Ethical statement
>Any piece of research ends or starts with
statements such as: “The authors declare no
conflict of interest” or the like
>What you just did with the exercise is a detailed
ethical statement:
>Issues at stake
>How you plan to handle them

Fall 2020 Prof. Dr. Olivier Berthod 90


Tomorrow
>See you online

Fall 2020 Prof. Dr. Olivier Berthod 91

You might also like