This document outlines the topics covered in Session 3 of a research methods course. It discusses ethical concerns related to research questions, including obtaining consent from participants, issues with covert research approaches, balancing openness with data collection opportunities, and maintaining confidentiality. Examples of covert studies that obtained valuable data despite deceiving participants are provided. The document also addresses ethical dilemmas around incentives, vulnerable populations, and conflicts of interest. Students are directed to relevant codes of ethics and institutional review board procedures. Real-life scenarios are presented to help students think through applying ethical standards in their own research.
This document outlines the topics covered in Session 3 of a research methods course. It discusses ethical concerns related to research questions, including obtaining consent from participants, issues with covert research approaches, balancing openness with data collection opportunities, and maintaining confidentiality. Examples of covert studies that obtained valuable data despite deceiving participants are provided. The document also addresses ethical dilemmas around incentives, vulnerable populations, and conflicts of interest. Students are directed to relevant codes of ethics and institutional review board procedures. Real-life scenarios are presented to help students think through applying ethical standards in their own research.
This document outlines the topics covered in Session 3 of a research methods course. It discusses ethical concerns related to research questions, including obtaining consent from participants, issues with covert research approaches, balancing openness with data collection opportunities, and maintaining confidentiality. Examples of covert studies that obtained valuable data despite deceiving participants are provided. The document also addresses ethical dilemmas around incentives, vulnerable populations, and conflicts of interest. Students are directed to relevant codes of ethics and institutional review board procedures. Real-life scenarios are presented to help students think through applying ethical standards in their own research.
Course structure 1. Introduction, paradigms, and research methods 2. Designs and evaluation criteria 3. Research questions and ethical concerns 4. Paper project development 5. Interviews and transcriptions 6. Paper project development 7. Observation and field notes 8. Paper project development 9. Documents: Textual and visual 10. Paper project development 11. Analysis and reporting 12. Paper project development 13. Presentations I 14. Presentations II
Fall 2020 Prof. Dr. Olivier Berthod 77
Ethical issues: Consent >People can refuse to take surveys >People can try and avoid leaving digital traces >But people cannot always refuse to be part of data collection during fieldwork >Central questions: Should you collect their consent? Should you inform them about your actual purpose?
Fall 2020 Prof. Dr. Olivier Berthod 78
Ethical issues: Covert research > Covert research / deceptive approaches: Many associations condemn such approaches > And yet: Sociologist Richard Leo (1997) disguised his liberal political and social views, instead feigning conservative beliefs, to build trust with police and thereby gain admission to interrogation rooms; Festinger and colleagues (1956) infiltrated a doomsday cult by lying about his profession and pretending to believe in the cult’s prophecies; Sociologist Humphreys (1970) pretended to be gay to gather data for his dissertation on homosexual encounters in public parks
Fall 2020 Prof. Dr. Olivier Berthod 79
Open/Covert: An open debate Should researchers inform participants in full,
or…
… should they use all opportunities to collect data?
Fall 2020 Prof. Dr. Olivier Berthod 80
Situation >You study non-verbal interactions between drivers at a particular intersection >How do you collect consent? >How do you guarantee ethical standards?
Fall 2020 Prof. Dr. Olivier Berthod 81
Ethical issues: Confidentiality >Grant anonymity to participants >Changes names of persons and places as long as it does not harm contextuality >Sometimes, participants wish to “own” their story >Sometimes, anonymity is a matter of safety for participants
Fall 2020 Prof. Dr. Olivier Berthod 82
Ethical issues: Retributions >“Why should we let you in?” >“What do I get from it?” >Data collection and incentives >Vouchers for participation in surveys is frequent >At the same time: How does this influence answers and willingness to share? >Try and avoid offering something valuable >Offer to share your findings, or to administer an instrument to diagnose something, etc. Fall 2020 Prof. Dr. Olivier Berthod 83 Case by case >Research with children >Research with vulnerable people >Conflicts of interest >Financial issues and funding >Research that involves risk >…
Fall 2020 Prof. Dr. Olivier Berthod 84
Where to start? >Huge differences between disciplines!! >Go through the code(s) of ethics of your discipline’s main association(s) >Go through your institution’s procedures (when do you need formal approval and what do you need to do to get it?) >Go through your association’s criteria and try and make a case for your procedures and their compliance >If you are not sure about your complying: Look for expert advice
Fall 2020 Prof. Dr. Olivier Berthod 85
Codes of ethics, a selection >Anthropology: http://ethics.americananthro.org/category/statement/ >Sociology: https://www.asanet.org/code-ethics >Political science: https://www.apsanet.org/portals/54/Files/Publications/A PSAEthicsGuide2012.pdf >Psychology: https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/ >Management research: https://aom.org/about-aom/governance/ethics/code-of- ethics >Economics: https://www.aeaweb.org/about-aea/code-of-conduct Fall 2020 Prof. Dr. Olivier Berthod 86 This week’s reading >What are your impressions? >Why did the review committee ask they conduct fieldwork in public or semi-public spaces? >What is the central question raised by the authors? >(Why) does this question make sense?
Fall 2020 Prof. Dr. Olivier Berthod 87
Applying the concepts >Consent: Did they collect consent? Why? >Covertness: >How did they motivate their position in the community they study? >What did they do to blend in? >What couldn’t they hide? >Confidentiality: Was it granted to the people studied? >Retributions of any sort? >Other dimensions you think are important to take into account? Fall 2020 Prof. Dr. Olivier Berthod 88 Exercise >Based on a real scenario from our textbook: >You plan to conduct research on male prostitution. >What ethical issues are you likely to encounter? >How could you handle them?
Fall 2020 Prof. Dr. Olivier Berthod 89
Ethical statement >Any piece of research ends or starts with statements such as: “The authors declare no conflict of interest” or the like >What you just did with the exercise is a detailed ethical statement: >Issues at stake >How you plan to handle them
Name: Roll No: Subject: Date: Grade/Div: 6 Ekam/Uno Ena/Otu/Eins OBJECTIVE: Learners Will Be Able To Comprehend The Case Study Independently SKILL: Scanning, Comprehending Overarching Meanings