Professional Documents
Culture Documents
https://www.reliableplant.com/Read/30198/managing-retiring-workers
Senior leaders across a broad array of industries continue to highlight retirements, turnover and
succession planning as key issues confronting their organizations. Much has been written and reported
on the impending retirement wave of baby boomer workers as one of those areas of concern.
As new generations enter the workforce and older generations remain at work longer,
employers must evolve to meet new employee needs. Most solutions involve recruiting tactics for
attracting new, younger talent to industry ranks through collaboration with local colleges and technical
schools, but what about proactively managing the actual turnover in the workplace? What's the broader
plan for transferring the “tribal knowledge” of departing workers to their replacements?
It takes time to shift from a culture of “That's the way we've always done it,” to “Here's
precisely how and why we do it this way.” This will require a commitment from leadership to
be engaged and visible with workers.
It's likely your organization has accomplished this within other elements of your
business. Safety and human resource departments tend to have evolved their
standardization of procedures and processes. Now is the time to initiate the change and
activities necessary to bring this consistency and standardization to your everyday
operating practices on the plant floor.
The operating culture of a U.S. Navy warship is an impressive vision for leaders to
model because it serves as a realistic example of how an organization can be efficient and
effective in managing workforce turnover.
A survey of corporate boards once defined the No. 1 reason senior executives are
terminated as “the inability to affect change within their organizations.” Likewise, changing
the operating culture within your organization to ensure the transitions that take place when
personnel leave will be a critical factor in meeting goals and objectives through this coming
wave of retirements and into the next generation of more frequent employee turnover.
Utilizing an EAM/CMMS
In many organizations, information is compartmentalized by functional group
(finance, procurement, etc.) and fragmented into pre-programmed reports or analysis
formats. As a result, it is difficult, if not impossible, to quickly and accurately measure
performance or make data-driven decisions.
Information is a highly complex, multi-dimensional and multi-disciplined issue. It is an
ongoing challenge to convert data into knowledge that is reproducible and sustainable. No
single employee or vendor can provide a comprehensive solution.
Handling the massive amounts of data generated by a plant is not a small endeavor.
A number of elements must be considered, including information quality, legacy systems,
data visibility, security concerns, etc. It is impossible to take everything into account upfront.
Many plants are data rich but knowledge poor. They record gigabytes of raw data
ranging from trivial transactions to critical business indicators. The rapidly changing global
market has put more pressure on the ability to quickly make data-driven decisions. As a
result, the volume of data needed to manage a company has grown by a factor of 10.
Unfortunately, the ability to convert raw data into an actionable database has not kept pace.
An enterprise information management system should be able to seamlessly
integrate in near real time all of the data required to manage the entire plant operation,
including each of its functions. It can provide effective coordination of activities and the
same real-time information to workers at the appropriate level.
In conclusion, adapting to a changing workforce climate with higher turnover
demands a multi-dimensional approach. Leaders must understand the dynamics of near
and long-term turnover in their organization as well as how younger generations of workers
will impact how they recruit, train and operate their business. They must also employ tactics
for capturing knowledge from workers approaching retirement before they leave. Utilizing an
EAM or CMMS can also help you institute and sustain best practices despite these higher
turnover rates.
Here are eight tips to help soon-to-be-retiring employees make a smooth exit.
Also avoid signaling to senior employees that you want them to leave by
asking, “Are you ready to retire?” A more subtle conversation may begin with,
“What are your plans for the next three to five years?”
3. Cross-train employees
Cross-training can also build your operational team and prevent information
silos.
Some employees want to start their permanent vacation ASAP. Others may
want to remain in a part-time or consulting role for a few years before hopping
in their RV and riding into the sunset.
For employees, such alternative work arrangements offer reduced stress and
a continued, though smaller, paycheck.
For employers, part-timers can lessen the chaos caused by a sudden change
in personnel. Going part-time forces needed changes in roles and
responsibilities, but leaves the older worker in place and available to answer
questions and share wisdom.
Occasional consulting may work for special projects or to free an experienced
manager to coach newer leaders.
Succession plans aren’t just for the C-suite. You also need to pay attention to
whether an entire department is closing in on retirement, and manage
accordingly.
For instance, if your entire HR department is 55+, you have trouble brewing.
As older HR workers retire or make lateral moves, you should have a plan in
place so that younger specialists and managers have time to learn from their
older peers and be ready to step into senior roles when the time comes.
Some managers unconsciously get into the mind-set of thinking they need
someone of a particular age, gender or other external characteristic rather
than focusing on skill set.
Aging employees need to know that it’s part of their job to train the younger
generation, and younger workers need to know it’s their job to learn from their
more experienced peers. At the same time, you don’t want to signal to older
workers that their experience is unappreciated or unneeded, or that you think
it’s time for them to leave.
Tenured employees are often the ones who’ve created bypasses for broken or
inefficient processes – processes you may not know are broken. Such
conversations give you the opportunity to capture what these workers know
and use it to the company’s advantage.
Knowledge transfer takes time and effort, so don’t wait until a week before the
retirement party to start the process. Either through mentorship, job sharing,
job shadowing or other techniques, have your retiring workers share the whys
behind what they do and the way they do it.
If you ask someone to document their job, it doesn’t have to be terribly formal
or in-depth, but it should cover the key elements. They should identify those
processes that are critical to the business, including important details, such as
where files are kept.
It signals an appreciation for what your aging employees do when you ask
them to partner with you in planning their graceful exit.
In the end, always go back to the human element when dealing with
someone’s retirement. Remember, you are touching on this person’s
livelihood and their identity so proceed with kindness and respect.
CIOs can take a leading role in preventing baby boomer brain drain by being
prepared to respond quickly when management decides the company needs
a KM system to help retain crucial knowledge. "CIOs need to know what’s
going on in this area because records management, search tools and
databases will be running on their systems," says Frappaolo. In many cases,
KM and human resources leaders can work closely with CIOs to put in place
databases that track knowledge and other technologies as part of an overall
plan. Northrop Grumman’s Shaffar, for example, says he works closely with
the IT department and spends more than 50 percent of his KM budget on IT—
and will continue to do so. "How would engineers connect across the U.S. if
they didn’t have e-mail, instant messaging or document management
systems?" he asks.
Experts divide such critical know-how into two parts: explicit and tacit
knowledge. The explicit kind refers to information that can be easily explained
and stored in databases or manuals. Tacit knowledge is much harder to
capture and pass on because it includes experience, stories, impressions and
creative solutions. Tacit knowledge is also much harder to get from people
because it accumulates over years of experience, and a scientist or
salesperson may not even know how to verbalize it.
For example, if an experienced scientist plans to retire in a year, the pharmaceutical
company where he works should have a younger researcher shadow the scientist and
work side by side. "In this way, the younger scientist will learn not just the facts, but the
method of diagnostics," Leonard says. "Databases are not a complete waste of time,
but it’s a mistake to believe they are transferring knowledge."
In some cases, it’s easy to see that the loss of a key employee, or group of employees,
will affect a company’s strategy and bottom line. At engine manufacturer Rolls Royce,
for example, managers—when faced with the impending retirement of a veteran
systems engineer—calculated that the engineer’s retirement would cost the company
$400,000 in the first year, says Colin Cadas, team leader for design technology at the
U.K.-based company. Cadas based the calculation on the number of employees whose
productivity is affected when the system is down and the average time the system is
unavailable. Using that calculation, managers could then justify the knowledge
acquisition activity before the engineer (the primary troubleshooter for that system) left.
The process also guaranteed increased training for younger engineers before the
retiring engineer left the company. "For every knowledge retention project we do, we
have those involved work out the business value to the organization," Cadas says.
After finding the 46 people who had this specialized experience, Cadas set up
a program that allowed younger, recently hired engineers to interview the
older experts. The engineers met and went through a questioning process that
enabled the younger employees to learn about supersonic technology and
then to put that knowledge into a repository for future reference.
For example, few would complain that they can’t find a typewriter repairman in
the phone book. However, organizations must carefully analyze whether a
technology or skill might be needed in the future.
Dedes says that the software lets him check how many employees are near retirement
age and how many might be leaving soon for other reasons. Another way to get a visual
picture of human interaction and pinpoint the go-to people in an organization is to do a
social network analysis (SNA), which often involves interviewing employees and
managers to see who is working with whom, and whom employees go to most often for
help. SNA software can help organizations map out relationships and get a clear picture
of who has the most knowledge and experience in a specific area (for more on SNA,
see "Who Knows Whom, and Who Knows What?" at www.cio.com/061505). The next
step is to work on retaining those people, says Mohl at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta.
"You need to focus on helping these people advance as quickly as possible," he says.
Looking Ahead
Most important, Shaffar has learned that the problem goes beyond looking at
what skills you have right now. "There have always been new generations,
and we’re not any different in that way," he says. "Mentoring, training and
passing on knowledge is not something you can do at the last minute. You
have to plan ahead."