Email GI Report of Unnathi Estate - Thane

M/s UNNATHI ESTATE
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT

FOR
PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT OF
‘BUILDING 54, 55 & 56’
AT
VARTAK NAGAR, THANE (W)
MAY 2014
1459-2013-110
BY
THANE (W) - 400 602
FOR
Invest in Investigation
BASEMENT, KRISHNA KUNJ,
R B LUMAN MARG,
NR NAUPADA POLICE STN,
PRASHANT NAGAR,
THANE (W) 400602
Tel – 022 2537 1020, ochre125@gmail.com
M/s UNNATHI ESTATE
THANE

FOR
‘BUILDING 54, 55 & 56’
AT
1459-2013-110
BY
THANE (W) - 400 602

Tel : 022 2538 1168
FOR
OCHRE DRILLERS INDIA PVT LTD
THANE (W) - 400 602
Tel : 022 2533 9393
MAY 2014
1459-2013-110
Proposed redevelopment of
Buliding 54, 55& 56
@ Vartak Nagar, Thane (W)
Geotechnical Investigation Report
M/s UNNATHI ESTATE

FOR
‘BUILDING 54, 55 & 56’
AT
1459-2013-110
CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENT Page 01

1.0 GENERAL Page 02
2.0 SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION Page 03
3.0 METHODOLOGY Page 04
4.0 FINDINGS OF INVESTIGATION Page 08
5.0 GEOTECHNICAL ASSESSMENT Page 11
ENCLOSURES
A) LOCATION PLAN OF BOREHOLES Page A1

B) BOREHOLE LOGS Page B1-B5
C) CORE LOGS Page C1-C22
D) LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Page D1-D4
E) SBC CALCULATION Page E1-E2
Page 1
1459-2013-110
Buliding 54, 55& 56

FOR
‘BUILDING 54, 55 & 56’
AT
1459-2013-110
1.0 GENERAL
1.1 M/s Unnathi Estate, Thane have proposed redevelopment of building 54, 55 & 56 at
Vartak Nagar, Thane (W). Proposed site is located on plot bearing CTS No 186, 364 of
village Majiwade at Vartak Nagar, Thane (W). Proposed building will be RCC framed
structure having stilt plus up to twenty nine upper floors.
1.2 Mr R.C.Tipnis is the structural consultants for the proposed project. Client decided
to carry out geotechnical investigation work to determine foundation design parameters. M/s
Ochre Drillers India Pvt Ltd, Thane was entrusted with work of geotechnical investigation.
1.3 Geotechnical investigation consisted of five boreholes for proposed building. M/s
Ochre Drillers India Pvt Ltd carried out fieldwork of five boreholes from March 19 to April
09, 2014. Selected soil, rock and water samples were tested in laboratory. Laboratory test
results were received on April 19, 2014.
1.4 This report has been prepared by the undersigned for M/s Ochre Drillers India Pvt
Ltd. Report covers data collected in fieldwork of five investigation boreholes and analysis of
laboratory test results. Report is limited to defining design parameters and specifying safe
bearing capacity. It does not involve any specialist design for any subsurface component or
visits by the undersigned to confirm any of the design parameters.
Page 2
1459-2013-110
Buliding 54, 55& 56
2.0 SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION
2.1 Scope of geotechnical investigation work for proposed building consisted of three
boreholes. Borehole is to be drilled through overburden & minimum 5.00 m in bed rock.
Depth of borehole is about 15.00 m from existing ground level. Objective of investigation is
to find out the subsoil stratification in project area and collect data for deciding design
parameters of foundation.
2.2 To meet above objectives, following items were included in the scope of work:
I) Conduct standard penetration tests in-situ to obtain shear strength parameters of soil
at interval of 1.00 to 1.50 metres & collect disturbed soil samples in SPT split spoon.
II) Collect undisturbed soil samples from cohesive soil stratum to determine the
engineering properties such as shear strength and compressibility.
III) Determine ground water level in each borehole. It was also required to collect ground
water sample from each borehole for chemical analysis.
IV) Collect and transport selected samples in soil & rock testing laboratory and conduct
relevant tests to determine engineering properties of different subsoil strata.
V) Prepare a geotechnical investigation report based on the data collected from field
and the results of the laboratory tests.
2.3 Fieldwork is summarised in the following table.

TABLE: SUMMARY OF BOREHOLES
Bore Rock Termination Ground
Hole Depth Depth Water Depth
No (m) (m) (m)
BH 1 4.50 15.10 1.00
BH 2 3.00 15.32 0.90
BH 3 4.00 15.17 1.10
BH 4 4.00 15.50 0.60
BH 5 4.00 10.10 Water Loss
Page 3
1459-2013-110
Buliding 54, 55& 56
3.0 METHODOLOGY
OBJECTIVE
3.1 Geotechnical investigation was planned to obtain subsoil stratification in proposed
project area and collect soil, rock and ground water samples for laboratory testing to
determine engineering properties such as shear strength, compressibility, along with basic
soil classification of subsurface stratum.
3.2 Locations of boreholes were selected in consultation with client. Data and results
obtained from this investigation will be used in design of foundation of proposed project.
FIELD INVESTIGATION
3.3 For geotechnical investigation work, standard rotary type drilling rig was used. This
rig is coupled with diesel engine and has tripod and all drilling accessories. Drilling rig
deployed is suitable for and has arrangement for driving as well as extracting casing, boring
drilling by mud circulation method, conducting Standard Penetration Test (SPT) collection of
Undisturbed Soil Sample (UDS) and Disturbed or wash Soil Sample (DS).
3.4 Drilling rig was installed at each specified borehole location. Rig was stabilised by
making level ground. Initially casing of adequate diameter to suit boring of 100 mm hole was
lowered and boring was commenced.
3.5 Sampling in each borehole was carried out generally as per the guidelines given in
the IS code. Undisturbed soil samples were to be collected and SPTs were conducted at
regular intervals. Undisturbed soil samples were not collected as cohesive stratum is stiff in
consistency.
3.6 Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were conducted in boreholes to obtain SPT ‘N’
values i.e. no. of blows of 63.5 kg hammer falling through 75 cm, required to penetrate 30
cm of SPT split spoon. This test was conducted as per IS-2131. SPT ‘N’ values are
correlated with the relative density of non-cohesive soils and consistency of saturated
cohesive soils. This test also collected samples in the split spoon assembly, which are
treated as disturbed samples. SPTs were taken @ 1.00 m to 1.50 m interval.
3.7 SPT ‘N’ values are co-related with relative density of non-cohesive stratum and with
consistency of cohesive stratum. Co-relations are tabulated below.
Page 4
1459-2013-110
Buliding 54, 55& 56
CO-RELATION FOR SATURATED SAND/NON-PLASTIC SILT

Relative Density Penetration Value (Blows/Ft)
Very loose 0 to 4 Blows
Loose 5 to 10 Blows
Medium 11 to 30 Blows
Dense 31 to 50 Blows
Very Dense Above 50 Blows
CO-RELATION FOR SATURATED CLAY/PLASTIC SILT

Consistency Penetration Value (Blows/Ft)
Very Soft 0 to 2 Blows
Soft 3 to 4 Blows
Medium Stiff 5 to 8 Blows
Stiff 9 to 16 Blows
Very Stiff 17 to 32 Blows
Hard Above 32 Blows
3.8 When rock was encountered, size of borehole was changed to Nx (76 mm) diameter.
A core barrel and Nx sized bits are used for drilling and recovering rock cores. Recovered
rock cores were numbered serially and preserved in good quality sturdy wooden core boxes.
Rock core recovery and Rock Quality Designation (RQD) were computed for every run
length drilled. Rock samples have been selected based on the probable founding elevation
of the proposed structure.
3.9 Rock classification in terms of weathering and state of fractures and strength is
carried out in the following manner. Tabulations given in below explain it briefly.
SCALE OF WEATHERING GRADES OF ROCK MASS
Terms Description Grade Interpretation
Fresh No visible sign of rock material weathering; perhaps slight I CR > 90 %
discoloration on major discontinuity surfaces.
Slightly Discoloration indicates weathering of rock material and II CR between 70
discontinuity surfaces. All the rock material may be discoloured
Weathered by weathering.
% to 90 %
Moderately Less than half of the rock material is decomposed or III CR between 51
disintegrated to a soil. Fresh or discolored rock is present either
Weathered % to 70 %
as a continuous framework or as corestones.
Highly More than half of the rock material is decomposed or IV CR between 11
disintegrated to a soil. Fresh or discolored rock is present either
Weathered % to 50 %
as a discontinuous framework or as corestones
Completely All rock material is decomposed and / or disintegrated to soil. V CR between
The original mass structure is still largely intact.
Weathered zero to 10 %
Residual Soil All rock material is converted to soil. The mass structure and VI CR = Zero %
material fabric are destroyed. There is a large change in
volume, but the soil has not been significantly transported.
But N > 50
As per IS 4464
Page 5
1459-2013-110
Buliding 54, 55& 56
3.10 It should be understood that all grades of weathering may not be seen in a given rock
mass and that in some cases a particular grade may be present to a very small extent.
Distribution of the various weathering grades of rock material in the rock mass may be
related to the porosity of the rock material and the presence of open discontinuities of all
types in the rock mass.
3.11 ‘Interpretation’ in above table has been done by Author of this report based on his
understanding of above table & experience and is NOT a part of original table and
observation of entire of rock mass instead of individual rock pieces.
3.12 Rock quality is further measured by frequency of natural joints in rock mass. Rock
Quality Designation (RQD) is used to define state of fractures or massiveness of rock.
Following table defines the quality of rock mass.
RELATION BETWEEN RQD AND IN-SITU ROCK QUALITY
RQD CLASSIFICATION RQD (%)
Excellent 91 to 100
Good 76 to 90
Fair 51 to 75
Poor 26 to 50
Very Poor 00 to 25
3.13 Rock is also classified by strength of intact rock cores collected during drilling. Rock
compressive strength (UCS) is used to define strength of rock. Following table summarizes
classification of rock based on strength.
CLASSIFICATION OF ROCK WRT COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
ROCK STRENGTH COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (MPA)
Extremely weak < 2.00
Very Weak 2.00 to 10.00
Weak 10.01 to 25.00
Average 25.01 to 50.00
Strong 50.01 to 100.00
Very Strong 100.01 to 250.00
Extremely Strong > 250.00
3.14 Ground water table was observed after dewatering the borehole and waiting for time
gap of 24 hours to allow for recuperation of ground water.
Page 6
1459-2013-110
Buliding 54, 55& 56
Sr. Class Concentration of Sulphates

No Expressed as SO3
Soil Ground Water
Total SO3 SO3 * In
Percent g/L g/L
I 1 Less Than 0.20 Less Than 1.0 Less Than 0.30
II 2 0.20 to 0.50 1.0 to 1.90 0.30 to 1.20
III 3 0.50 to 1.00 1.90 to 3.10 1.20 to 2.50
IV 4 1.00 to 2.00 3.10 to 5.00 2.50 to 5.00
V 5 More Than 2.00 More Than 5.00 More Than 5.00
3.15 Boreholes were terminated after drilling in soil and minimum 5.00 m in bed rock.
Boreholes were terminated from 15.00 m depth below existing ground level. On completion
of boreholes, selected soil and rock were taken to laboratory for testing.
IS CODES FOLLOWED
3.16 Field work was executed generally in accordance with IS specifications listed below:
a) IS-1892 : Code of practice for Subsurface Investigation of Foundations.
b) IS-1498 : Classification and Identification of soils for General Engineering Purposes.
c) IS-2131 : Method for Standard Penetration Test for Soils
d) IS-2132 : Code for practice for Thin Walled Tube Sampling of Soils.
e) IS-5313 : Guide for Core Drilling Observations.
3.17 Following Laboratory testing was carried out as per relevant IS codes.
a) Grain size distribution and consistency limits on soil samples for engineering
classification as per IS-1498.
b) Crushing strength of rock to decide safe bearing capacity of shallow foundation on
the rock and/ or the safe friction and end bearing resistance for deep foundations
such as piles, as per IS codes IS-9143 and IS-8764.
c) Chemical analysis of soil and ground water to determine pH, S03 & CI contents to
decide any precautionary measures for protecting foundation concrete and
reinforcement, as per IS-2720 (part-26) and IS-3025 (Part 24 and 32).
Page 7
1459-2013-110
Buliding 54, 55& 56
4.0 FINDINGS OF INVESTIGATION
4.1 Logs of five boreholes drilled for proposed redevelopment of building 54, 55 & 56
were studied. Following subsoil profile was inferred up to final depth of boreholes.
Stratum One : Filled Up Soil
Stratum Two : Yellow Stiff Silty Clay
Stratum Three : Completely Weathered Rock
Stratum Four : Highly Weathered Basalt
Stratum Five : Moderately Weathered Basalt
Stratum Six : Slightly Weathered Basalt
STRATUM ONE : FILLED UP SOIL

4.2 First stratum of subsoil profile is filled up soil. This stratum is present in all five
boreholes. Thickness of this stratum is 4.50 m in BH 1, 3.00 m in BH 2, BH 3, BH 4 and 1.00
m in BH 5. This stratum consists of clay mixed with yellow silt in varying percentage.
Standard penetration test was not conducted in this stratum.
STRATUM TWO : YELLOW STIFF SILTY CLAY

4.3 Second stratum of subsoil profile is yellow stiff silty clay. This stratum is present
only in BH 5. Thickness of this stratum is 2.60 m in BH 5. This stratum consists of clay mixed
with silt in varying percentage with few gravel. Two standard penetration tests were
conducted in this stratum. Reported SPT ‘N’ values are 12 & 15. These SPT ‘N’ values
indicate stiff consistency of cohesive stratum. One soil sample from this stratum was
selected for laboratory testing. Result of same is tabulated below.
Gravel % 04
Sand % 23
Fines % 72
Liquid Limit % 72
Plastic Limit % 26
Plasticity Index % 46
Soil Classifications as per IS-1498 CH
STRATUM THREE : COMPLETELY WEATHERED ROCK

4.4 Third stratum of subsoil profile is completely weathered rock. This stratum is
present in BH 3, BH4 and BH 5. Thickness of this stratum is 1.00 m in BH 3 & BH 4 and 0.40
m in BH 5. To advance through this hard stratum, drilling was carried out using Nx drilling
bits & core barrel. Small rock pieces and wash samples were recovered in drill runs. Visual
Page 8
1459-2013-110
Buliding 54, 55& 56
examination of wash & SPT samples collected during drilling revealed that it was completely
weathered rock having residual rock structure, which is locally known as murrum.
STRATUM FOUR : HIGHLY WEATHERED BASALT

4.5 Fourth stratum of subsoil profile is highly weathered Basalt. This stratum is also
present in all boreholes except BH 5. Thickness of this stratum is 4.00 m in BH 1, 3.50 m in
BH 2, 5.00 m in BH 3 and 3.00 in BH 4. Rock core recovery values in this rock stratum are
from 12 to 50 percent. These values of rock core recoveries show highly weathered
condition of rock mass. Rock quality designation values are zero percent in most of drill runs
with two higher values of 24 & 28 percent. These values indicate very poor state of fractures
in rock stratum. Three rock core samples selected from this stratum were tested in
laboratory. Reported three rock core samples were crumbled during process of saturation.
STRATUM FIVE : MODERATELY WEATHERED BASALT

4.6 Fifth stratum of subsoil profile is moderately weathered Basalt. This stratum is also
present in all boreholes except BH 1. Thickness of this stratum is 1.50 m in BH 2, 4.00 in BH
3, 1.00 m & BH 4, 0.50 m in BH 5. Rock core recovery values in this rock stratum are from
54 to 72 percent. These values of rock core recoveries show moderately weathered
condition of rock mass. Rock quality designation values are from 22 to 57 percent. These
values indicate poor to fair state of fractures in rock stratum. Three rock core samples
selected from this stratum were tested in laboratory. Reported saturated crushing strength
values on two rock core samples are 24.89 & 18.21 MPa. Reported saturated crushing
strength value derived from point load index on remaining one rock sample is 1.54 MPa.
These values indicate that rock is average in strength. Other test results are as below.
Porosity % 16.45, 3.42, 4.96
Water Absorption % 6.79, 1.28, 1.90
Dry Density kN/m3 24.21, 26.68, 26.08
Saturated Crushing Strength MPa ----, 24.89, 18.21
UCS from point load index MPa 1.54, ----, ----
STRATUM SIX : SLIGHTLY WEATHERED BASALT

4.7 Sixth stratum of subsoil profile is slightly weathered Basalt. This is the last stratum
up to depth of investigation in both boreholes. Drilling was carried out in this stratum for
thickness of 6.60 m in BH 1, 7.32 m in BH 2, 2.17 m in BH 3, 7.50 m in BH 4 and 5.60 m in
BH 5. Rock core recovery values in this rock stratum are from 70 to 94 percent with few
Page 9
1459-2013-110
Buliding 54, 55& 56
lower values of 63, 67 & 68. These values of rock core recoveries show slightly weathered
condition of rock mass. Rock quality designation values are from 20 to 90 percent. These
values indicate fair to good state of fractures in rock stratum. Six rock core samples selected
from this stratum were tested in laboratory. Reported saturated crushing strength values on
six rock core samples are from 7.35 to 21.97 MPa. These values indicate that rock is
average in strength. Other test results are as below.
Porosity % 11.96, 8.72, 8.09, 9.25, 10.37, 5.82
Water Absorption % 4.85, 3.42, 3.13, 3.68, 4.12, 2.25
Dry Density kN/m3 24.64, 25.47, 25.80, 25.16, 25.16, 25.86
Saturated Crushing Strength MPa 7.35, 12.11, 20.28, 9.25, 10.68, 21.97
WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS

4.8 Ground water level was observed during fieldwork and after completion of boreholes.
At the time of investigation, ground water level was observed at 1.00 m in BH 1, 0.90 m in
BH 2, 1.10 m in BH 3 and 0.60 m in BH 4 below existing ground level, and complete water
loss was observed in BH 5. However, for determination of more reliable ground water level,
long term observations in cased holes or open stand pipe piezometers are desirable.
4.9 Water level fluctuations due to seasonal variations, amount of rainfall, runoff and
other factors were not evident at the time of fieldwork. Trapped or “perched” water could
occur within the fill materials and/or above low permeability soil and rock layers. Water level
fluctuations and perched water may be considered while developing design and construction
drawings and specifications for the project.
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
4.10 Five water sample collected from boreholes was analysed chemically in the
laboratory. Following results are reported.
‘pH’ Value 7.74, 7.62, 7.16, 7.24, 7.06 Alkaline Water
Sulphates (ppm) 50, 50, 100, 100, 150 Class I /Table IV/IS 456
Chlorides (ppm) 20, 10, 20, 20, 30 Less than 500 ppm/Table 1/IS 456
Results of chemical analysis indicate that water is not aggressive to concrete and not
corrosive to reinforcement steel.
Page 10
1459-2013-110
Buliding 54, 55& 56
5.0 GEOTECHNICAL ASSESSMENT
5.1 M/s Unnathi Estate, Thane have proposed redevelopment of building 54, 55 & 56 at
Vartak Nagar, Thane (W). Proposed building will be RCC framed structure having stilt plus
up to twenty nine upper floors.
FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS
5.2 Foundation system designed for proposed structure shall satisfy two following
independent criteria.
1. Foundation design shall have adequate factor of safety with respect to shear strength of
foundation stratum.
2. Vertical deformation (settlement) caused by loading intensity on foundation stratum shall be
within permissible limits of the structure. These criteria shall also ensure that magnitude of
differential settlement between any two adjoining columns must remain within tolerances. So
that finishing of proposed structures does not show distress.
FOUNDATION SYSTEM
5.3 Top stratum of subsoil profile is overburden soil. This stratum is present in all
boreholes. Thickness of this stratum is 4.50 m in BH 1, 3.00 m in BH 2, BH 3, BH 4 and 1.00
m in BH 5. Engineering properties of this stratum cannot be determined reliably. Therefore,
foundations shall not be placed in this stratum.
5.4 This stratum is followed by yellow stiff silty clay. This stratum is present only in BH
5. Thickness of this stratum is 2.60 m in BH 5. This stratum is present only in one borehole
and has very limited thickness. Therefore, foundations shall not be placed in this stratum.
5.5 This stratum is followed by completely weathered rock. This stratum is present in
BH 3, BH4 and BH 5. Thickness of this stratum is 1.00 m in BH 3 & BH 4 and 0.40 m in BH
5. This stratum has variable thickness and placing footing foundations in this stratum likely
cause differential settlement. Therefore, foundations shall not be placed in this stratum.
5.6 This stratum is followed by highly weathered Basalt. It continues up to termination

depth, improving in quality with depth. This stratum is suitable for placing footing
foundations. Therefore, foundations shall be placed in this stratum.
Page 11
1459-2013-110
Buliding 54, 55& 56
5.7 To evaluate safe bearing capacity of highly & moderately weathered Basalt, rock
mass rating value was determined. Average rock mass properties were considered to
determine RMR value as per IS 13365 (part I). RMR rating value of highly & moderately
weathered Basalt for given condition is 10 & 44 respectively. Using this value and referring
to Table 8 of IS 12070-1987, net safe bearing capacity value works out to be 425 kN/m2 &
1503 kN/m2 respectively. RMR computation is enclosed with this report. Considering 10 mm
permissible settlement of foundations, modulus of sub grade reaction value also calculated
as 42500 kN/m2/m & 150000 kN/m2/m.
5.8 Recommended founding depths and net SBC value are tabulated as below.
Foundations shall be placed minimum 50 cm in rock stratum.
Option 1- Raft Foundation : Founding stratum - Highly Weathered Basalt
Modulas of Subgrade
Borehole Minimum Founding Net Safe Bearing
Reaction
No Depth (m) Capacity kN/m2 (T/m2)
(kN/m2/m)
BH 1 5.00 425 (42.50) 42500
BH 2 3.50 425 (42.50) 42500
BH 3 4.50 425 (42.50) 42500
BH 4 4.50 425 (42.50) 42500
BH 5 4.50 425 (42.50) 42500
Option 1 - Footing Foundation : Founding stratum - Moderately Weathered Basalt

Modulas of Subgrade
Borehole Minimum Founding Net Safe Bearing
Reaction
No Depth (m) Capacity kN/m2 (T/m2)
(kN/m2/m)
BH 1 9.00 1500 (150) 150000
BH 2 7.00 1500 (150) 150000
BH 3 9.50 1500 (150) 150000
BH 4 7.50 1500 (150) 150000
BH 5 5.00 1500 (150) 150000
5.9 It will be necessary to place footing of entire structure on rock of similar quality to
ensure uniformity of foundation stratum and compatibility of deformation. It will be desirable
that structural engineer inspects founding stratum to confirm that there are no soft pockets in
the footing plan area before placing PCC.
5.10 To account for variation in founding depth thus achieved, only PCC or plum concrete
of design strength recommended by structural consultant shall be used make good the
difference between founding stratum and bottom of raft foundation at founding depth.
Page 12
1459-2013-110
Buliding 54, 55& 56
Rubble soling layer shall not be provided below footing foundation on reaching this
founding stratum.
DURABILITY
5.11 Based on the results of chemical analysis of water, it is clear that ground water is not
aggressive to concrete and not corrosive to reinforcement steel. Therefore, it is
recommended to use Ordinary Portland Cement. It is recommended to provide sufficient
clear cover to steel reinforcement.
April 25, 2014
Page 13
CORE LOG
Client : M/s Unnathi Estate
Project : Proposed Redevelopment of Building 54, 55 & 56 at Vartak Nagar, Thane (W)
Basement , Krishna Kunj,
Bore Hole Dia. : 100mm/ Nx Date of Commence: 19/03/2014
R B Luman Marg, Near Naupada
Bore Hole No : BH 1 Police station, Thane (W) 400602
Water Table : 1.00 m BGL Date of Completion : 22/03/2014 Tel : 022- 2537 1020
Drill Total Angle of
Nature Rock Rock Wash
Depth Run No of Core Length of Piece Piece Joint Water Core
of Core Quality Description Water Remarks
(m) Lengt Pieces Core No Length with Loss Loss
Fracture Recovery Designation Colour
h Recovered Vertical
From To (cm) From To (cm) (cm) (M/J) (Deg) (%) (%) (%) (%)
0.00 4.50 Overburden
4.50 5.00 50 1 2 6 1 2 J H 12 Nil Piece No 1 to 13 Grey Nil

2 4 J V Highly
Weathered Basalt
5 00
5.00 5 50
5.50 50 3 6 10 3 3 J V 20 Nil Grey Nil
4 2 J V
5 2 J V
6 3 J V
5.50 6.00 50 7 9 7 7 3 J V 14 Nil Grey Nil

8 2 J V
9 2 J V
6.00 6.50 50 10 13 10 10 3 J V 20 Nil Grey Nil

11 2 J V
12 3 J V
13 2 J V
Page C1
CORE LOG
15 4 J H Highly
16 4 J H Weathered Basalt
7.00 7.50 50 17 19 16 17 4 J H 32 Nil Grey Nil

18 7 J H
19 5 J H
7.50 8.00 50 20 22 11 20 3 J H 22 Nil Grey Nil

21 5 J H
22 3 J H
8.00 8.50 50 23 26 18 23 2 J H 36 Nil Grey Nil

24 2 J H
25 5 J H
26 9 J H
8.50 9.00 50 27 27 37 27 37 J H 74 74 Piece No 27 Grey Nil

Slightly
Weathered Basalt
Page C2
CORE LOG
9.00 9.50 50 28 32 32 28 6 J H 64 24 Piece No 28 to 46 Grey Nil
29 5 J H Slightly
31 3 J V
32 12 M M
9.50 10.00 50 33 36 37 33 11 J V 74 46 Grey

G ey Nil
34 4 J V
34A 4 J V
35 12 J H
36 6 J H
10.00 11.00 100 37 46 68 37 10 J V 68 34 Grey Nil
38 2 J V
39 3 J V
40 5 J H
41 5 J V
42 12 J H
43 4 J H
44 12 J H
45 8 J H
46 7 J H
Page C3
CORE LOG
11.00 12.00 100 47 57 67 47 3 J V 67 26 Piece No 47 to 67 Grey Nil

48 2 J H Slightly
50 8 J H
51 3 J V
52 3 J V
53 8 J V
54 6 J H
55 12 M M
56 14 J H
57 6 J H
12.00 13.00 100 58 67 85 58 5 J V 85 54 Grey Nil
59 3 J H
60 3 J H
61 8 J V
62 3 J V
63 6 J H
64 3 J H
65 10 J H
66 24 J H
67 20 J H
Page C4
CORE LOG

69 25 J H Slightly
70 10 J V Weathered Basalt
71 14 J H
72 6 J V
73 8 J H
14.00 15.10 110 74 79 104 74 14 J V 95 91 Grey Nil

75 11 J H
76 4 J H
77 29 J H
78 23 J H
79 23 J H
Borehole BH 1 terminated at 15.10 m B.G.L
Page C5
CORE LOG

2 2 J H Highly
3.50 4.00 50 4 7 13 4 2 J V 26 Nil Grey Nil

5 5 J V
6 3 J V
7 3 J H
4.00 4.50 50 8 11 12 8 4 J H 24 Nil Grey Nil

9 3 J V
10 3 J V
11 2 J V
4.50 5.00 50 12 14 8 12 3 J V 16 Nil Grey Nil

13 3 J V
14 2 J V
Page C6
CORE LOG
5.00 5.50 50 15 18 8 15 2 J V 16 Nil Piece No 15 to 28 Grey Nil
16 2 J V Highly
18 2 J V
5.50 6.00 50 19 22 10 19 3 J V 20 Nil Grey Nil

20 2 J V
21 3 J V
22 2 J V
6.00 6.50 50 23 28 19 23 5 J V 38 Nil Grey Nil
24 2 J V
25 3 J V
26 2 J V
27 2 J V
28 5 J H

30 6 J V Moderately
32 11 J V
33 4 J H
Page C7
CORE LOG

35 7 J H Moderately
37 9 J H
7 50
7.50 8 00
8.00 50 38 42 32 38 12 J H 64 24 Gre
Grey Nil
39 9 J H
40 4 J H
41 3 J H
42 4 J V
8.00 8.50 50 42A 46 36 42A 16 J H 72 32 Piece No 42A to 46 Grey Nil

43 9 J H Slightly
45 4 J H
46 3 J H
Page C8
CORE LOG
48 4 J H Slightly
50 3 J H
51 2 J H
52 3 J H
53 3 J H
54 5 J H
55 10 J H
9.00 10.00 100 56 59 68 56 14 J H 68 68 Grey Nil

57 17 J H
58 13 J H
59 24 J H
10.00 11.00 100 60 64 75 60 11 J H 75 75 Grey Nil

61 18 M M
62 22 J H
63 10 J H
64 14 J V
Page C9
CORE LOG
66 7 J H Slightly
68 12 J H
69 19 J H
70 7 J H
12.00 13.00 100 71 75 68 71 23 J H 68 53 Grey Nil

72 19 J H
73 9 J H
74 11 J H
75 6 J H
13.00 14.00 100 76 80 76 76 26 J H 76 76 Grey Nil

77 14 J H
78 14 J H
79 12 J H
80 10 J H
Page C10
CORE LOG
82 14 J H Slightly
84 14 J H
85 19 J H
86 19 J H
Page C11
CORE LOG

2 3 J V Highly
4 3 J V
4.50 5.00 50 5 9 14 5 2 J V 28 Nil Grey Nil

6 5 J H
7 2 J V
8 3 J H
9 2 J H
5.00 5.50 50 10 13 13 10 3 J V 26 Nil Grey Nil

11 3 J V
12 4 M M
13 3 J V
Page C12
CORE LOG
15 2 J V Highly
17 4 J V
18 2 J V
6 00
6.00 6 50
6.50 50 19 21 8 19 3 J V 16 Nil Gre
Grey Nil
20 2 J V
21 3 J V
6.50 7.00 50 22 25 12 22 2 J V 24 Nil Grey Nil

23 4 J V
24 3 J V
25 3 J V
7.00 7.50 50 26 29 17 26 3 J V 34 Nil Grey Nil

27 5 J V
28 4 J V
29 5 J V
Page C13
CORE LOG
31 3 J V Highly
33 2 J V
34 3 J H
8 00
8.00 8 50
8.50 50 35 37 23 35 5 J V 46 24 Gre
Grey Nil
36 6 J V
37 12 J H
8.50 9.00 50 38 40 25 38 7 J H 50 28 Grey Nil

39 14 J V
40 4 J H

42 13 J H Moderately
Weathered Basalt
9.50 10.00 50 43 46 33 43 10 J H 66 48 Grey Nil
44 3 J H
45 14 J H
46 6 J H
Page C14
CORE LOG

50 3 J H
51 2 J H
52 6 J H
53 3 J H
54 5 J H
55 7 J H
56 6 J H
11.00 12.00 100 57 62 64 57 9 J H 64 52 Grey Nil

58 14 J H
59 14 J H
60 11 J H
61 3 J H
62 13 J H
Page C15
CORE LOG
64 13 J V Moderately
66 9 J H
67 8 J H
68 10 J V
69 6 J H
70 2 J V
71 2 J H

73 9 J V Slightly
75 10 J V
76 3 J H
77 2 J H
78 9 J V
79 8 J H
80 8 J H
Page C16
CORE LOG
82 6 J V Slightly
84 21 J H
85 25 J H
86 10 J V
Page C17
CORE LOG

2 4 J V Highly
4.50 5.00 50 4 5 13 4 9 J V 26 Nil Grey Nil

5 4 J V
5.00 5.50 50 6 7 10 6 7 J M 20 Nil Grey Nil

7 3 J V
5.50 6.00 50 8 8 3 8 3 J V 6 Nil Grey Nil
6.00 6.50 50 9 10 15 9 4 J H 30 22 Grey Nil

10 11 J V
6.50 7.00 50 11 13 25 11 8 J H 50 30 Grey Nil

12 2 J H
13 15 J H
Page C18
CORE LOG

15 18 J H Highly
8.00 9.00 100 17 22 69 17 9 J H 69 52 Grey Nil

18 21 J H
19 18 J H
20 2 J H
21 13 J H
22 6 J H

26 25 J H
10.00 11.00 100 27 29 67 27 25 J H 67 67 Grey Nil

28 26 J H
29 16 J H
Page C19
CORE LOG
Weathered Basalt
12.00 13.00 100 32 33 81 32 53 J H 81 81 Grey Nil
33 28 J H
13.00 14.00 100 34 38 63 34 26 J H 63 51 Piece No 34 to 47 Grey

y Nil
35 15 J H Slightly
37 10 J H
38 7 J H
14.00 15.50 150 39 47 110 39 15 J H 73 60 Grey Nil
40 24 J H
41 9 J H
42 2 J H
43 13 J H
44 18 J H
45 10 J H
46 10 J H
47 9 J H
Page C20
CORE LOG
Water Table : Water Loss Date of Completion : 9/04/2014 Tel : 022- 2537 1020

2 6 J H Moderately
4 11 J H

6 13 J H Slighty
5.00 5.50 50 8 11 35 8 5 J H 70 50 Grey Nil

9 15 J H
10 10 J H
11 5 J H
5.50 6.00 50 12 15 35 12 11 J H 70 48 Grey Nil

13 7 J H
14 4 J H
15 13 J H
Page C21
CORE LOG
Water Table : Water Loss Date of Completion : 9/04/2014 Tel : 022- 2537 1020

17 5 J H Slighty
19 36 J H
7.00 8.00 100 20 26 75 20 15 J H 75 62 Grey Nil
21 8 J H
22 13 J H
23 5 J H
24 10 J H
25 14 J H
26 10 J H
8.00 9.00 100 27 29 70 27 22 M M 70 70 Grey Nil

28 36 M M
29 12 J H
9.00 10.10 110 30 33 93 30 25 J V 85 85 Grey Nil

31 18 J V
32 20 J V
33 30 J V
Page C22
SOIL TEST DATA SHEET
Client : M/s Unnathi Estate Contractor : M/s Ochre Drillers India Pvt Ltd, Thane
Project : Proposed Redevelopment of building 54, 55 & 56 at Vartak Nagar, Thane (W)
CONSISTENCY CONSOLIDATION
SPECIFIC GRAVITY
CLASSIFICATION
DENSITY MECHANICAL ANALYSIS
CONTENT, w %
SAMPLE TYPE
BORE HOLE /
LIMITS TEST
MOISTURE
REMARKS
NATURAL
PIT NO.
DEPTH
COMP. INDEX
SHRINKAGE %
UD / D
INITAL VOID
PLASTICITY
SOIL
PLASTIC %
INDEX, Ip %
GRAVEL %
(m)
WET gm/cm
DRY gm/cm
(I.S)
Free Swell
LIQUID %
RATIO %
Pressure
SAND %
Swelling
CLAY %
Index %
Cc (Lab)
2
SILT %
Kg/cm
BH 05 2.00 - 2.60 SPT 4 23 72 72 26 46 CH 2.86
CHEM CHEMICAL ANALYSIS Tuu :- TRIAXIAL TEST UNCONSOLIDATED UNDRAINED SP :- SWELLING PRESSURE OR SWEELING ANGLE OF INTERNAL FRICTION
f :-
COMP COMPACTION TEST Tcu :- TRIAXIAL TEST CONSOLIDATED UNDRAINED POTENTIAL TEST Cc :- UNDRAINED COHESION
DS :- DIRECT SHEAR Tcd :- TRIAXIAL TEST CONSOLIDATED DRAINED RM :- REMOULDED f' :- EFFECTIVE ANGLE OF INTERNAL
K :- PERMEABILITY TEST NP :- NON PLASTIC VL :- LABORATORY VANE SHEAR TEST FRICTION
FS :- FREE SWELL TEST SL :- SHRINKAGE LIMIT TEST UC :- UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST Cc' :- EFFECTIVE COHESION
Job. No. :- 1459

Prepd. By. :- Shraddha
Page D1
TEST RESULTS OF ROCK CORES
Uniaxial
Bore Failure Dry Point Load
Sr. Core Depth Diameter Height H:D Compressive Porosity Water
Hole Load Density Index Remarks
No. No. m cm cm (1:H/D) Strength % Absorption %
No. Tonnes gm / cm3 Kg / cm2
Kg / cm2
1 BH 01 1 4.50 - 5.00 Crumbled

2 BH 01 35 9.50 - 10.00 5.4 10.9 2.02 74 11.96 4.85 2.46
3 BH 01 66 12.00 - 13.00 5.5 11 2.00 121 8.72 3.42 2.55
4 BH 01 79 14.00 - 15.10 5.5 10.6 1.93 203 8.09 3.13 2.58
5 BH 02 3 3.00 - 3.50 Crumbled

6 BH 02 36 7.00 - 7.50 5.5 6.4 16.45 6.79 2.42 15.49 PL
7 BH 02 56 9.00 - 10.00 5.5 11.1 2.02 93 9.25 3.68 2.52
8 BH 02 85 14.00 - 15.32 5.5 11.2 2.04 107 10.37 4.12 2.52
9 BH 03 8 4.50 - 5.00 Crumbled

10 BH 03 41 9.00 - 9.50 5.4 10.7 1.98 249 3.42 1.28 2.67
11 BH 03 59 11.00 - 12.00 5.4 10.6 1.96 182 4.96 1.90 2.61
12 BH 03 72 13.00 - 14.00 5.4 11.1 2.06 220 5.82 2.25 2.59
* indicates the sample failed along joints
** All Samples were Soaked for 24 Hours Before the Test
Job No :- 1459
Prepd By :- Shraddha
Page D2
TEST RESULTS OF ROCK CORES
Uniaxial
Bore Failure Dry Point Load
Sr. Core Depth Diameter Height H:D Compressive Porosity Water
Hole Load Density Index Remarks
No. No. m cm cm (1:H/D) Strength % Absorption %
No. Tonnes gm / cm3 Kg / cm2
Kg / cm2
13 BH 04 6 5.00 - 5.50 5.3 8.1 6.95 2.72 2.56 16.38 PL

14 BH 04 13 6.50 - 7.00 5.3 11.3 2.13 167 4.09 1.56 2.62
15 BH 04 27 10.00 - 11.00 5.4 10.5 1.94 266 3.85 1.46 2.64
16 BH 04 43 14.00 - 15.50 5.4 10.7 1.98 96 5.68 2.17 2.61
17 BH 05 4 4.00 - 4.50 5.4 11.5 5.23 1.99 2.62 110.15 PL

18 BH 05 24 7.00 - 8.00 5.4 10.8 9.19 3.65 2.52 47.59 PL
19 BH 05 31 9.00 - 10.00 5.4 10.8 2.00 290 8.82 3.39 2.60
* indicates the sample failed along joints

** All Samples were Soaked for 24 Hours Before the Test
Job No :- 1459
Page D3
Chemical Analysis of Water

Contractor : M/s Ochre Drillers India Pvt Ltd, Thane
Serial Bore Hole

Depth pH' Value Sulphates as SO3- Chlorides as Cl-
No No
(m) (ppm) (ppm)
1 BH 01 0.00 7.74 50 20
2 BH 02 0.00 7.62 50 10
3 BH 03 0.00 7.16 100 20
4 BH 04 0.00 7.24 100 20
5 BH 05 0.00 7.06 150 30
Job No :- 1459
Page D4
Date : April 22, 2014
Job No : 1459
Client : M/s Unnati Estate
Project : Proposed Redevelopment of Building 54, 55 & 56
Subject : Safe Bearing Capacity by RMR Method Highly Weathered Basalt
To determine net safe bearing pressure of rock stratum, strength of rock core alone is not used.
Overall characteristics of rock mass which are covered by five parameters such as Rock Quality
Designation value, Spacing of Discontinuty, Condition of Discontinuity and Ground Water Condition
are studied and used to calculate net safe bearing pressure of rock mass instead of rock core.
Average rock mass parameters as obtained from boreholes are used below.
ESTIMATION OF ROCK MASS RATING

Rock Mass Rating (RMR) of jointed rock masses has been worked out based on IS 13365 (part III)
Lab & Field
Parameters Unit Classification Rating
Values
Strength of Intact Rock (UCS) MPa Average 10 2
Rock Quality Designation (RQD) % Very Poor 0 3
Spacing of Discontinuities m Very Close 0.060 5
Condition of Discontinuities Wide Discontinuity 5 0
Ground Water Condition Flowing 5 0
Total Rock Mass Rating 10
ESTIMATION OF NET SAFE BEARING PRESSURE

Net safe bearing pressure of rock stratum is estemated for calculated rock mass rating value, by
relation given in Table 3, IS 12070 : 1987
Description of rock with RMR Values between 0 to
20 is Very Poor and
corresponding range of net safe bearing pressure is 400 to 550 kN/m 2
By interpolation, Net safe bearing pressure = 475 kN/m 2
Considering various in rock mass properties in entire footprint area,
recommended Net Safe Bearing Pressure = 425 kN/m2
SETTLEMENT CALCULATIONS
Settlement can be calculated using elastic theory by adopting appropriate values for modulus of
elasticity and Poisson’s ratio of the rock mass. Magnitude of settlement is calculated using following
equation;
qsB(1-2) (Reference : Duncan C Wyllie,
 = Cd Foundations On Rock, equation No
Where, E 5.18, page No 129)
δ = Settlement of foundation For calculating Young’s modulus, relation given by Serafim-
qs = Safe bearing pressure Pereira (1983) is used.
B = Width/diameter of foundation E = 10(RMR-10)/40 GPa
µ = Poisson’s ratio E = 1000000 kN/m 2
E = Young’s Modulus Poisson’s ratio (μ) = 0.25 (J E Bowles, Foundation Analysis and
Design, 5th edition, Table 2-7, Page
Cd = Shape (influence) factor No 123)
Considering square footing,
Width of Foundation (B) = 6.00 m Therefore, H/B = 0.75
Depth of Foundation (H) = 4.50 m L/B = 1.00
Shape Factor, Cd = 0.62 (Duncan C Wyllie, Foundations On Rock, Table 5.5, page No 131)
Subtituting values,  = 1.47 mm < 12 Hence OK Permissible settlement in rock

mass as p
per IS 13063 = 12 mm
Calculated settlement of footin foundation is within permeasible range.

Therefore, Recommended Net Safe Bearing Capacity = 425 kN/m2
Page E1
Date : April 22, 2014
Job No : 1459
Client : M/s Unnati Estate
Project : Proposed Redevelopment of Building 54, 55 & 56
Subject : Safe Bearing Capacity by RMR Method Moderately Weathered Basalt
To determine net safe bearing pressure of rock stratum, strength of rock core alone is not used.
Overall characteristics of rock mass which are covered by five parameters such as Rock Quality
Designation value, Spacing of Discontinuty, Condition of Discontinuity and Ground Water Condition
are studied and used to calculate net safe bearing pressure of rock mass instead of rock core.
Average rock mass parameters as obtained from boreholes are used below.
ESTIMATION OF ROCK MASS RATING

Rock Mass Rating (RMR) of jointed rock masses has been worked out based on IS 13365 (part III)
Lab & Field
Parameters Unit Classification Rating
Values
Strength of Intact Rock (UCS) MPa Average 25 4
Rock Quality Designation (RQD) % Poor 40 11
Spacing of Discontinuities m Close 0.144 9
Condition of Discontinuities Moderately to Highly Weathered 3 20
Ground Water Condition Flowing 5 0
Total Rock Mass Rating 44
ESTIMATION OF NET SAFE BEARING PRESSURE

Net safe bearing pressure of rock stratum is estemated for calculated rock mass rating value, by
relation given in Table 3, IS 12070 : 1987
Description of rock with RMR Values between 40 to
60 is Fair and
corresponding range of net safe bearing pressure is 1510 to 2800 kN/m 2
By interpolation, Net safe bearing pressure = 1768 kN/m 2
Considering various in rock mass properties in entire footprint area,
recommended Net Safe Bearing Pressure = 1503 kN/m2
SETTLEMENT CALCULATIONS
Settlement can be calculated using elastic theory by adopting appropriate values for modulus of
elasticity and Poisson’s ratio of the rock mass. Magnitude of settlement is calculated using following
equation;
qsB(1-2) (Reference : Duncan C Wyllie,
 = Cd Foundations On Rock, equation No
Where, E 5.18, page No 129)
δ = Settlement of foundation For calculating Young’s modulus, relation given by Serafim-
qs = Safe bearing pressure Pereira (1983) is used.
B = Width/diameter of foundation E = 10(RMR-10)/40 GPa
µ = Poisson’s ratio E = 7079458 kN/m 2
E = Young’s Modulus Poisson’s ratio (μ) = 0.25 (J E Bowles, Foundation Analysis and
Design, 5th edition, Table 2-7, Page
Cd = Shape (influence) factor No 123)
Considering square footing,
Width of Foundation (B) = 2.50 m Therefore, H/B = 2.80
Depth of Foundation (H) = 7.00 m L/B = 1.00
Shape Factor, Cd = 1.00 (Duncan C Wyllie, Foundations On Rock, Table 5.5, page No 131)
Subtituting values,  = 0.50 mm < 12 Hence OK Permissible settlement in rock

mass as p
per IS 13063 = 12 mm
Calculated settlement of footin foundation is within permeasible range.

Therefore, Recommended Net Safe Bearing Capacity = 1503 kN/m2
Page E2

Email GI Report of Unnathi Estate - Thane

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Email GI Report of Unnathi Estate - Thane

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

M/s UNNATHI ESTATE

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT

THANE (W) - 400 602

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT

THANE (W) - 400 602

M/s UNNATHI ESTATE

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENT Page 01

A) LOCATION PLAN OF BOREHOLES Page A1

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT

2.0 SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION

2.3 Fieldwork is summarised in the following table.

CO-RELATION FOR SATURATED SAND/NON-PLASTIC SILT

CO-RELATION FOR SATURATED CLAY/PLASTIC SILT

Sr. Class Concentration of Sulphates

4.0 FINDINGS OF INVESTIGATION

STRATUM ONE : FILLED UP SOIL

STRATUM TWO : YELLOW STIFF SILTY CLAY

STRATUM THREE : COMPLETELY WEATHERED ROCK

STRATUM FOUR : HIGHLY WEATHERED BASALT

STRATUM FIVE : MODERATELY WEATHERED BASALT

STRATUM SIX : SLIGHTLY WEATHERED BASALT

WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS

5.0 GEOTECHNICAL ASSESSMENT

5.6 This stratum is followed by highly weathered Basalt. It continues up to termination

Option 1 - Footing Foundation : Founding stratum - Moderately Weathered Basalt

April 25, 2014

0.00 4.50 Overburden

4.50 5.00 50 1 2 6 1 2 J H 12 Nil Piece No 1 to 13 Grey Nil

5.50 6.00 50 7 9 7 7 3 J V 14 Nil Grey Nil

6.00 6.50 50 10 13 10 10 3 J V 20 Nil Grey Nil

7.00 7.50 50 17 19 16 17 4 J H 32 Nil Grey Nil

7.50 8.00 50 20 22 11 20 3 J H 22 Nil Grey Nil

8.00 8.50 50 23 26 18 23 2 J H 36 Nil Grey Nil

8.50 9.00 50 27 27 37 27 37 J H 74 74 Piece No 27 Grey Nil

9.50 10.00 50 33 36 37 33 11 J V 74 46 Grey

11.00 12.00 100 47 57 67 47 3 J V 67 26 Piece No 47 to 67 Grey Nil

13.00 14.00 100 68 73 76 68 13 J H 76 62 Piece No 68 to 79 Grey Nil

14.00 15.10 110 74 79 104 74 14 J V 95 91 Grey Nil

Borehole BH 1 terminated at 15.10 m B.G.L

0.00 3.00 Overburden

3.00 3.50 50 1 3 8 1 3 J H 16 Nil Piece No 1 to 14 Grey Nil

3.50 4.00 50 4 7 13 4 2 J V 26 Nil Grey Nil

4.00 4.50 50 8 11 12 8 4 J H 24 Nil Grey Nil

4.50 5.00 50 12 14 8 12 3 J V 16 Nil Grey Nil

5.50 6.00 50 19 22 10 19 3 J V 20 Nil Grey Nil

6.50 7.00 50 29 33 29 29 5 J V 58 22 Piece No 29 to 33 Grey Nil

7.00 7.50 50 34 37 36 34 11 J H 72 22 Piece No 34 to 42 Grey Nil

8.00 8.50 50 42A 46 36 42A 16 J H 72 32 Piece No 42A to 46 Grey Nil

9.00 10.00 100 56 59 68 56 14 J H 68 68 Grey Nil

10.00 11.00 100 60 64 75 60 11 J H 75 75 Grey Nil

12.00 13.00 100 71 75 68 71 23 J H 68 53 Grey Nil

13.00 14.00 100 76 80 76 76 26 J H 76 76 Grey Nil

Borehole BH 2 terminated at 15.32 m B.G.L

0.00 4.00 Overburden

4.00 4.50 50 1 4 11 1 3 J V 22 Nil Piece No 1 to 13 Grey Nil

4.50 5.00 50 5 9 14 5 2 J V 28 Nil Grey Nil

5.00 5.50 50 10 13 13 10 3 J V 26 Nil Grey Nil

6.50 7.00 50 22 25 12 22 2 J V 24 Nil Grey Nil

7.00 7.50 50 26 29 17 26 3 J V 34 Nil Grey Nil

8.50 9.00 50 38 40 25 38 7 J H 50 28 Grey Nil

9.00 9.50 50 41 42 27 41 14 J H 54 54 Piece No 41 to 46 Grey Nil

10.00 11.00 100 47 56 59 47 8 J H 59 14 Piece No 47 to 62 Grey Nil