Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. The gravity model is often used to not only explain between two countries, but
also to investigate the reason why they don’t. Illustrate this anomaly with suitable
examples and reasons.
Answer 1 (b):
When the production possibility frontier is a straight line, the opportunity cost of a
unit of apple in term of bananas is constant. As we saw Graph Home’s
Production Possibility Frontier in the answer 1 (a), this opportunity cost is defined
as the number of unit of bananas the economy would have to give up in order to
produce an extra unit of apple.
In this case, to produce another unit would require a LA person-hours. Each of
these person-hours could in turn have been used to produce 1/ a LB unit of
bananas.
Thus, the opportunity cost of apple in term of bananas is a LB/ aLA. It takes 3
person-hours to make a unit of apple and 2 person-hours to produce a unit of
bananas, the opportunity cost of each unit of apple is 1.5 unit of bananas.
Answer 1 (c):
In competitive economy, supply decisions are determined by the attempts of
individuals to maximize their earning. In simplified economy, since labor is the
only factor of production, the supply of apple and bananas will determined by the
movement of labor to whichever sector pay the higher wage.
We saw in the previous that it is the opportunity cost of apple in term of bananas.
aLA/ aLB = 1.50.
We have therefore just derived a crucial proposition about relationship between
price and production: the economy will specialize in the production of apple if the
relative price of apple exceed its opportunity cost in term of bananas. The price
of apple should be more than 1.5 times of price of bananas.
A country is willing to produce more goods than other countries with the same
production factors and level of technology.
Before specialization
Based on the table above, using the same quantity of factors and the same level
of technology, India country is more efficient (has absolute benefits) in the
production of rice and cloth compared to Thailand country. In such a situation,
whether international trade can be conducted between the two countries depend
on the opportunity cost involved by both countries in producing rice and cloth.
Based on the table above, India country has lower opportunity cost in rice
production compared to Thailand country. On the other hand, Thailand country
has lower opportunity cost in cloth production compared to India country.
Therefore, India country has comparative advantages compared in rice
production, while Thailand country has comparative advantage in cloth
production.
Comparative advantage
India: Rice
Thailand: Cloth
During specialization,
4. We have focused on the case of trade involving only two countries. Suppose that
there are many countries capable of producing two goods, and that each country
has only one factor of production, labor. What could we say about the pattern of
production and trade in this case? (Hint: try constructing the world relative supply
curve).
In the case of a market with multiple goods, the gains from trade would depend on the world
relative prices of the goods. The world relative supply curve here will be a step shaped curve
with multiple horizontal sections. These sections represent the unit labor requirements of the N
countries and the horizontal lines will be linked by multiple vertical lines. The downward sloping
demand curve will intersect the supply curve at a point that will represent the world relative
price. Companies to the left of this point can export the good (because they enjoy a comparative
advantage in it) to countries to the right of the curve. There is also a chance the intersection
occurs in the middle of one of these horizontal lines, which would mean that country specializes
in, and can produce, both goods.