Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Market
Market capitalism Market socialism
COORDINATING
MECHANISM
The types of modern economic systems illustrated in figure 2.1, shows how the ‘public’ or
‘private’ ownership emanates a system, as per respect to what coordinating system it belongs.
So, apparently, modern economic systems could be understood as the following:
-Private ownership in a market economy creates a concept of ‘Market capitalism’;
whereas private ownership in a command economy creates a concept of ‘Command
capitalism.’
-Public ownership in a market economy creates a concept of ‘Market socialism’;
whereas public ownership in a command economy creates a concept of ‘Command
socialism.’
Since each pure type of modern economic system is characterized by one type of
coordinating mechanism and one type of ownership when it comes to the means of production,
the four pure types above differ with another as to respect with their structure of economic power
and economic decision-making. Right before discussing each of these modern economic system,
let’s make a concrete concept of what is the elicited idea that surrounds a modern economy and
its four pure types.
MARKET CAPITALISM
In a market capitalist economy, it has an apparent concept that factors of production are
owned by private individuals. Take note: private individuals,
not with people from government posts. So, the essential Market capitalism is
feature is private enterprise and the motive of production is usually defined as a
solely for profit purposes. Let’s take the USA as an example. system where private
In USA, production is undertaken on the individuals and
basis of the market forces of demand and corporations own the
supply. In this setup, the country managed means of production,
to create products inclined to what the where private
people demand. As a result, the investments drive the
commodities in the market would be more in
economy and where
needs and comforts.
competitive markets link
One more thing, the prices, are employers and workers.
fixed by the market forces. In
market capitalism, the policy of
minimum intervention is followed by the government. Meaning to say
the government’s role is limited to giving licenses and in settling any
kind of arbitration in economic aspect. In this, in a capitalist market
society, prices can be set on items the amount one pays for it what the true cost of a product or
service costs. In addition, market capitalism is in pursuit of determining price and production
goods and services. Because, on one hand, it is focusing on the creation of wealth and ownership
of capital, as well as factors of production. Society where market capitalism exist, it would be
visibly show that production and pricing of goods are determined by the market, or supply and
demand. However, you might ask, what does the government do? Then, some regulations of
course may occur in place of government role.
Let’s have an example.
Suppose I am a seller of a branded shirts for $25 each, and a buyer wants to buy that shirt for
$20. Now, between me and the buyer, a transaction will occur. In Tagalog, “tatawad ka.”
Transaction itself will come to agree or not on the price. Because in a market capitalist system, it
is in pursuit of supply and demand, that leads to free competition in the economy, without any
stringent intervention from outside forces.
MARKET SOCIALISM
Market socialism is an economic system in
which firms and means of production are owned and
controlled by the government. Yet, firms sell their
products to consumers in competitive markets. In other
words, market socialism is based on social (cooperative
or public) ownership of the means of production but
within the context of a market economy. When we
consider the means of production, we can identify two
types of market socialism:
Cooperative ownership of the means of production in a market economy: employees are
at the core of this system. Workers own the enterprises as well as the profits of their
operations; and
Public ownership of the means of production in a market economy: in this case, firms are
owned and managed by public authorities while profits are divided among all citizens.
In market socialism, the government is largely involved in the economic
sphere but private property is not entirely abolished. In fact, while in socialist
systems everything was owned and controlled by the government, in this case,
enterprises work within the framework of a competitive market economy.
Market socialism – also known as “liberal socialism” – is a moderate form of
classic socialism. In fact, in a market socialist system, the government does not have control over
all means of production and does not oversee the entire process of production. It revolves around
the idea of equilibrium of the market. According to Oskar
Lange, the main supporter of such theory, the economic activity
should be established and coordinated by a planning board
(comprising members of the government). Prices should be set
by the government and firms should be directed to produce until
the cost of production equals the cost previously foreseen by the
board. Subsequently, the board should adjust prices in order to
achieve a market equilibrium (equilibrium between supply and
demand).
Moreover, I could probably tell that ownership matters. Because it gives people a say on
the things they cared about. Being owner in a business for example, it gives people motivation
and state in its success. Sadly, if you come across with people and ask the, people will say that
they have no influence. No influence in workplace, on businesses, and over the economy as a
whole. But in market socialism, people are way very different; they protrude to control together
especially those closest to the business; customer, employees, residents, suppliers and distant
shareholders. All of them has an equal say in how a business run and even decide what to do
with the profit. As a matter of fact, all people has control on things that matter; clearly, in market
socialism, all work together.
COMMAND CAPITALISM
First and foremost, let’s take a quick moment to understand Capitalism. It is an economic system
in which the economy is profit-driven and the production and services are mainly determined by
market forces that is i. e; consumers, producers, marketers and investors.
COMMAND SOCIALISM
Having sense of command in a socialist
economy quite possess perplexing concept.
Now, it was said that command capitalism and
market socialism are not the only alternatives to
market capitalism. Yet another, is what we call the
Command Capitalism. Better yet to know an
apparent concept of this, command economic
systems suggests that factors of production are
publicly-owned.
As the stretch of words suggest, command socialism rejects both market coordination and
private ownership of the means of production, and is intrinsically linked with authoritarianism of
which it is a product. Just means to say, that the state owns and controls most of the factors of
production, including land and capital goods. The state also engages in central planning; in
which production of goods and services, as well as their prices and distribution, are centrally
controlled by the state. In command socialist economy, everything done by government is done
by people wielding government power. They are subject to the same limitations with which we
all must contend. What a government knows is simply what individuals in that government
know. Just means to say, when command economy in socialist perception collide, it will show a
subordinated state of economy to the government’s political power. To understand thoroughly
the concept of Command Socialism, take a look at the illustration below: