Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BMJ Support Palliat Care: first published as 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002612 on 21 August 2020. Downloaded from http://spcare.bmj.com/ on August 22, 2020 at Association for Palliative
Are advance care plans of author’s priorities, help them to
understand and balance treatment
options, and gain consent. An ACP
any value? then projects this process into a
future when the author cannot speak
for herself. This is not a measurable
Derek Willis ,1 Rob George2 commodity but is a basic building
block of what it means and what
it is, to respect patients as people.
Recent papers in BMJ Support and So, what is the use of an ACP? This is the intrinsic use of an ACP
Palliative Care concerning advance Philosophers distinguish instru- and its justification, not that it
care plans (ACP) offer empirical mental from intrinsic value. Instru- reduces unnecessary admissions.
evidence that helps us to under- mental value emphasises outcome: We are then free to measure how
stand how ACP are, and should be, something is valuable because of we achieve this rather than just why.
applied.1 2 They are welcome and what it produces. Intrinsic value
timely as critics often argue that emphasises what value something Funding The authors have not declared a
palliative medicine sometimes has, in and of itself. Like the person specific grant for this research from any
funding agency in the public, commercial
values opinion over evidence. whom an ACP concerns, it has or not-for-profit sectors.
However, even in medicine, some intrinsic value as a representation of Competing interests None declared.
things do not need evidence as who they are—before it is an instru-
Patient consent for publication Not
proof: indeed, their value may be ment to summarise what they want. required.
clear despite the evidence. ACP is an That misses the point dangerously.
Provenance and peer review Not
example, properly done, it captures Hence, what matters is to accumu- commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
a unique narrative. Rationality late evidence to define how we do
and professionalism are the justi- ACP well rather than why we do it.4