Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JP Morgan - 2020 COVID
JP Morgan - 2020 COVID
PORTFOLIO INSIGHTS
2020 Long-Term
Capital Market Assumptions
LTCMA Mark-to-Market: COVID-19 – New cycle, new starting point
Time-tested projections
to build stronger portfolios
IN BRIEF
• Prompted by the profound shock to the economy • While the full implications of today’s policy actions
and markets of COVID-19, we are for the very are still vague, the effect of massive fiscal and
first time providing an off-cycle mark-to-market monetary stimulus, and the associated jump in
of our Long-Term Capital Market Assumptions government borrowing, could eventually lead to
return projections. steeper curves, a shift in equity market leadership
and a tilt in how economic rewards are shared in
• We have not altered the assumptions themselves
the years to come.
but, rather, focused on how the sharp swings in
asset prices will affect the long-term outlook for • We finish with personal recollections and insights
returns and, by extension, portfolio construction. gained through previous crises from a dozen of
our most senior portfolio managers, strategists
and research analysts. While no two bear markets
are the same, the lessons of history can offer a
helpful perspective.
LTCMA Mark-to-Market:
COVID-19 – New cycle, new starting point
John Bilton, CFA, Head of Global Multi-Asset Strategy, Multi-Asset Solutions
Change in expected returns for selected assets Key expected bond returns and forecast inflation
In providing this mark-to-market of our return expectations, Expected returns in credit have improved more or less in inverse
we should first note that we have not altered any of the proportion to credit quality. This reflects both the level of spread
equilibrium economic assumptions or normalization pathways widening that took place and the shorter duration of speculative
that we published in November 2019. Our economic framework grade bonds compared with investment grade. The March 31
is based on a supply-side model that provides an estimate of mark-to-market doesn’t account for the Fed’s recent decision to
trend growth for countries and regions. While COVID-19 is clearly buy corporate bonds, including some BB rated bonds, which has
having a deep impact on economic activity today, we see few compressed spreads quickly in April. Equally, however, it does not
first-order impacts on the long-term potential growth of the reflect either the recent oil price volatility or the extended
economy. Simply put, we don’t see the coronavirus-linked leverage in some sectors – both of which may act to increase
recession as significantly changing potential growth in the long credit losses in the near term. On balance, expected returns in
term. Certainly, some of the policy measures being rolled out credit have risen, and in some cases they approach those
today could have an impact at the margin, and we will assess available in equity markets. Meanwhile, government bond returns
these in our 25th edition of the LTCMAs, due in November, but for have fallen and in most instances are now negative in real terms.
the purposes of this exercise we are keeping our ultimate Although duration is set to remain in demand while the world is
equilibrium growth, inflation and policy rates unchanged. in recession, today’s buyers of bonds really shouldn’t be looking
to hang onto them for the long haul.
As stock markets slumped in March, sovereign bond yields fell
and credit spreads widened, translating to a drop in expected Expected returns for stocks have risen across the board by between
returns of 30 basis points (bps) for world government bonds2 and 100bps and 250bps. This may seem counterintuitive given recent
a jump of 170bps for U.S. high yield bonds when we mark-to- commentary on the risks to earnings, dividends and buybacks. But
market off of March 31 asset prices. But as we delve deeper, we even though short-term fluctuations in earnings are important,
find some interesting nuances. The decline in government bond within our LTCMA equity framework we focus on trend earnings,
returns is profound for U.S. Treasuries – with expected returns for which are linked to long-term potential growth. At the same time, we
U.S. 10-year notes falling 70bps and for the long Treasuries index would not expect restrictions on cash return to persist for long after
falling 130bps. By contrast, expected returns for euro the crisis and recession start to clear. Although in certain regions
government bonds are actually 30bps better, reflecting the and sectors there is near-term pressure to reduce payouts, we don’t
extraordinarily low yields already in place well before the start of expect that to become a lasting theme since the nature of this shock
the coronavirus crisis (Exhibit 2). was not a result of corporate misbehavior.
At this stage we don’t expect the current recession to significantly
Across geographies, the returns on longer-duration bonds are affect potential growth in the long run largely because the losses
worse than those for cash have been socialized – taken on to the governments’ balance sheet.
EXHIBIT 2: KEY BOND EXPECTED RETURNS (USD, EUR, JPY, GBP) AND The medium-term implications for household and corporate
FORECAST INFLATION financial health should be limited and as a result trend earnings
Cash return Bond index return Long end return Inflation rate and margins remain largely stable in our outlook. Thus the major
Bond return comparison LTCMA update 2020, local expected return, % change to our forecasts is linked to valuations, and therefore to
3% prevailing prices.
U.S. large cap stocks were long the most expensive of equities,
2%
yet throughout the last expansion they set the pace globally due
1%
to the high quality of the market and the tilt toward technology.
As of March 31, expected returns for U.S. large caps had risen
0% from 5.60% to 7.20%, reflecting the sharp drop in the index over
March. While this puts expected returns from U.S. equities much
-1% closer to what we consider their fair “secular” level,3 expected
returns for other regions now stand well ahead of the U.S. In
-2%
local currency terms, returns on euro area equities increase
USD GBP EUR JPY
240bps to 8.20%, emerging market (EM) equities increase 90bps
Source: LTCMAs, J.P.Morgan Asset Management Multi-Asset Solutions; data as of to 9.60%, and Japanese equities increase 100bps to 6.50%. Given
April 2020.
the current overvaluation of the U.S. dollar, the currency effect
Note: USD refers to the US Government Bond Index Return.
further amplifies the expected return premium for non-U.S.
markets. But when this is put into risk-adjusted terms, the non-
U.S. return premium is lessened (Exhibit 3).
3
Secular return expectations were referenced in both the 2019 and 2020 LTCMA notes
and refer to the anticipated level of returns from an asset at equilibrium; in the case
2
Global government bonds, hedged in USD. of equities, this eliminates the effect of valuation and margins from the estimate.
Equity returns have moved higher, driven by better starting valuations. This has implications for Sharpe ratios as well.
EXHIBIT 3: SHARPE RATIOS FOR KEY EQUITY CLASSES, MID-YEAR UPDATE VS 2020 LTCMAS
Mid-year update 2020 Sharpe ratio LTCMA 2020 Sharpe ratio Mid-year update 2020 expected return, USD LTCMA expected return, USD
0.42 10.5%
Emerging market equity Emerging market equity
0.35 9.2%
0.45 8.2%
Japanese equity Japanese equity
0.36 7.2%
0.39 10.0%
Euro area large cap Euro area large cap
0.27 7.7%
0.39 7.2%
U.S. large cap U.S. large cap
0.26 5.6%
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0%
Source: LTCMAs, J.P.Morgan Asset Management Multi-Asset Solutions; data as of Source: LTCMAs, J.P.Morgan Asset Management Multi-Asset Solutions; data as of
April 2020. April 2020.
Sharpe Ratio = (Compound Return - Cash Return) / Volatility.
A rise in expected returns for private equity and This translates to an increase in expected returns of between
real assets 70bps and 100bps for real estate, and around 70bps for
infrastructure, which is generally less cyclical and has greater
For financial alternatives – notably private equity and hedge cash flow protection; REIT returns increase meaningfully due to
funds – the most important driver of returns is the expected higher leverage and valuation adjustments.
return on public asset markets. Higher expected returns across
public equity markets translate to an increase in expected With expected returns from bonds now impaired due to low
returns for cap-weighted private equity of 100bps to 9.80%. starting yields, real assets with reliable noncyclical cash flows are
Our alpha projections continue to be relatively aggressive for likely to receive renewed attention from asset allocators. As
both hedge funds and private equity and recent market volatility investors move on from the liquidity fears that led to market
actually reinforces our conviction that there is a good medium- turmoil in March, it is worth noting that it was real asset
term outlook for alpha generation. Notably, dry powder on innovators that emerged as winners in the post-2008 period.
private equity balance sheets can be deployed now at lower entry Those assets exposed to technology and to renewables fared
multiples, broadly offsetting higher debt funding costs, and especially well, and while we think these themes remain strongly
higher volatility plus greater dispersion augurs well for hedge in play for the next cycle, there is an added dimension of fiscal
fund alpha trends. stimulus. Sectors that benefit from this fiscal largesse also stand
to be among the winners in the next cycle.
Within commodities the plunge in energy prices raises the
expected return outlook despite there being no change to our What secular themes might characterize
underlying trend growth assumptions. For gold, meanwhile, we the next cycle?
have left our return expectations unchanged despite the strong
rally in the metal. Over the long run we expect our projection of Across all asset classes, we make only one alteration in this
a weaker dollar and an eventual rebound in inflation to support mark-to-market exercise – the starting price. Given that price
expected returns for gold. action, particularly in equity and credit markets, remains highly
volatile, we would note that the mark-to-market based on prices
Expected returns for private real assets have also risen, in our from March 31 serves mainly as a guide. Over the coming
view, but we caveat this statement knowing that the actual months, the likely character of the next cycle and the
marks-to-market are typically possible only six to eight weeks implications of recent policy innovations will become clearer. But
after quarter end. As a result, our estimates based on a one point from this exercise is very clear and is borne out by
theoretical March 31 mark-to-market necessarily have a wide examining the expected returns based on different starting asset
confidence band. We think as a base case that capital values for prices (Exhibit 4): The more prices fall in the short run, the
real assets may be marked down as much as 10% as a result of greater the boost to long-term expected returns. Put another
the prevailing crisis. However, unlike the global financial crisis, way, the more bearish one is today, the more bullish one should
when inflated asset values drove impairments, we see much of be about long-run returns.
the markdown arising from the recession-induced near-term hit
to cash flows. In the fullness of time, we expect these cash flows
to rebound – first in the more stable core sectors, such as
logistics, and rather later in more cyclical sectors like hotels.
Entry points are an important driver of long-term returns, especially when markets are as volatile as they have been recently
EXHIBIT 4: LONG-TERM RETURN SENSITIVITY TO ENTRY POINT FOR U.S. EQUITY AND U.S. 10-YEAR NOTE
On the face of it, this may seem an odd statement to make, but we believe more expansionary fiscal policy will be a permanent
it reflects an important observation, which is that we should not feature as we emerge from the recession despite the fact that
confuse cyclical and secular drivers of returns. As we learned in governments will have accumulated significant amounts of debt.
the global financial crisis, treating even profound cyclical issues – There is simply no appetite for new wave of austerity. As a result,
banking stability, for example – as a secular drag on returns can we expect both monetary and fiscal policy to remain expansionary
lead to an underestimate of long-term returns. Policymakers into the recovery (a stark difference from the post-global financial
could, and did, find ways to help asset market returns recover. crisis period). This in turn should lead eventually to steeper curves
At the core of our LTCMA framework are our underlying economic and reflationary pressure in the intermediate term.
building blocks of population, productivity and policy. And while
This is likely to be highly supportive for equities relative to
we will have to account for some policy shifts in the longer run –
bonds over the full extent of our 10- to 15-year forecast horizon –
particularly how successfully fiscal stimulus is deployed, and how
something hinted at if we look at the extreme levels that equity
it is ultimately paid for – the other building blocks of our
risk premia have now reached in all major markets (Exhibit 5).
framework are quite stable. As a result, while starting points
Nevertheless, steeper curves and more scope for a reflationary
matter greatly to our return outlook, we urge readers not to
cycle in the next expansion could prompt a shift in equity
mistake today’s cyclical issues for secular headwinds.
leadership. Value stocks never quite had their moment over the
Moving beyond the immediate impact of the price volatility on our last 10 years as low yields and a very low inflation backdrop
return expectations, there are some secular themes that we favored longer-duration equity and growth as a style. From a
believe might come to characterize the next cycle. First, we regional perspective, this played to the strengths of the U.S.
believe that fiscal stimulus will be a game changer. In our 2020 market – and with the surge in technology it meant that the
edition of the LTCMAs, we wrote about the failure of monetary 2010s really was “the American decade” for stock market returns.
policy, noting that in the next recession fiscal stimulus would also The technology theme is here to stay, but with scope for steeper
be required. Our main surprise is that this has happened so curves, reflation – and the possibility of fiscal stimulus sharply
quickly and so decisively. While the current recession will naturally boosting investment in renewables and sustainability – the 2020s
see concurrent disinflationary pressure and low bond yields, might see other regions start to play catch-up.
The recent decline in bond yields has pushed equity risk premia to near historical highs
EXHIBIT 5: EQUITY RISK PREMIA FOR KEY EQUITY MARKETS
GFC U.S. Europe Japan EM
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
-2%
1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2014 2019
Source: Datastream, LTCMAs, J.P.Morgan Asset Management Multi-Asset Solutions; data as of April 2020.
Since our last update, the stock-bond frontier has steepened markedly
EXHIBIT 6A: USD STOCK-BOND FRONTIERS EXHIBIT 6B: EUR STOCK-BOND FRONTIER
2020 Mid-year update Updated 60/40 portfolio 2020 Mid-year update Updated 60/40 portfolio
2020 stock-bond frontier 60/40 portfolio (2020) 2020 stock-bond frontier 60/40 portfolio (2020)
2008 stock-bond frontier 60/40 portfolio (2008) 2008 stock-bond frontier 60/40 portfolio (2008)
12 9
Euro area large cap
EM equity 8 U.S. HY (hedged)
EM debt (hard currency, hedged) Private equity
10 EM debt Global infrastructure equity Private equity
(hard currency) 7
AC World equity
8 U.S. HY AC World equity 6 U.S. large cap (hedged)
Compound return (%)
Compound return (%)
Source: LTCMAs, J.P.Morgan Asset Management Multi-Asset Solutions; data as of April 2020.
While no two crises are identical, the lessons of history can provide a
helpful framework for investors trying to navigate the coronavirus shock
to the economy and markets. Drawing on their experiences of past crises,
from the 1987 stock market crash to the sovereign debt crisis, our most
senior portfolio managers, strategists and research analysts share their
personal recollections and lessons learned. It’s a varied montage that we
hope will resonate.
By the summer of 1998, I had been running hedging and arbitrage strategies for institutional clients for almost 20
years. I thought that the decisions I had made during the 1987 crash would be the defining moment of my career.
Little did I know what lay ahead.
Jeffrey Geller, CFA
That summer, cracks began to appear in Russian debt markets and other emerging markets. Options going out six
Chief Investment months to a year, which I would typically be buying for hedging purposes, were trading incredibly cheap in terms of
Officer, the forecast for risk. I snapped them up for clients that wanted to hedge. Meanwhile, in the arbitrage strategies that
Multi-Asset Solutions I ran, spreads were exceptionally narrow. On a risk-reward basis, these relationships made no sense, and I believed
they were unsustainable. I slashed arbitrage risk across portfolios.
Then came the September demise of hedge fund Long-Term Capital Management, whose portfolio positioning
(including ungodly amounts of leverage) had been driving markets. The fund’s unraveling created an extraordinary
opportunity. I sold longer-dated volatility on equity indices for three times what I had paid earlier that summer, and
at a premium even to levels reached around the 1987 crash. In addition, the internet craze was in full swing,
enabling a successful arbitrage play: buying the calls on an internet stock and shorting the stock against it.
Looking back, the decisions I made in 1998 seem straightforward, but at the time they felt scary. Rather than a
defining moment, they could have spelled the end of my career if my positioning had gone the wrong way. And that
lesson has stayed with me.
After 42 years in the business, I sometimes feel like I’ve seen everything. But I’ve never seen anything like the
current crisis, unleashed by a global pandemic. No one knows how long or deep the downturn will be. Given that
uncertainty, it’s a time for balanced risk-taking.
In the fall of 1987, I was teaching an economics course at Michigan State University. On Monday, October 19, an
excited student ran into my office to tell me that the Dow Jones Industrial Average had fallen by 508 points, which
at the time was 22.6%. I explained to him why that couldn’t have happened – but of course it had, in the single
biggest daily percentage decline in U.S. history.
Dr. David Kelly, In retrospect, the 1987 crash taught us a great deal.
CFA
First, it was a crash without an obvious fundamental cause. The stock market had been rising strongly for almost
Chief Global
five years without a significant correction, and valuations were above average levels. However, the economy was
Strategist, Head
growing steadily and geopolitical tensions were not particularly abnormal. Some have pointed to a falling dollar as
of Global Market
a cause for the crash, but it is hard to argue that changes in exchange rates could justify wiping out over 20% of the
Insights Strategy
value of U.S. companies.
Second, it was a crash without significant economic consequence. Consumer spending held up well in the months after
the 1987 crash, and the economy continued to grow steadily until the mild recession of 1990.
Third, the crash serves as the single biggest reminder that stock market returns are not normally distributed. The
standard deviation of daily returns in the year before the crash was just 25 index points. As has often been the case
before and since, the decline in the market was exacerbated by trades designed to de-risk portfolios by dumping
stocks or stock index futures as the market declined.
Finally, the crash underscores the value of long-term investing. If my student, instead of racing into my office that
afternoon, had run off to a stockbroker, invested his money and achieved the average return of the S&P 500 since
then, he would have made 10.9% annually, including dividends. However, if on that afternoon he had arrived in
tears to tell me that he had put his savings into the market the Friday before the Black Monday crash, he would still
have made an annual 10.0% over the subsequent years.
I loved being a technology investor in the late 1990s – it was such an exciting time. The internet, just emerging,
unleashed fantastic possibilities. You could buy things online! Work from home! Connect with your friends! The “old”
analog economy was ceding ground to the “new” digital economy. Just putting “dot-com” in a corporate name made
the valuation soar, occasionally past 100 times earnings (if there were no earnings, often “eyeballs” on a website
Lee Spelman, CFA sufficed).
Head of U.S. Equity
Tech stocks doubled and then doubled again. It seemed everyone from taxi drivers to doctors wanted to be a day
trader. Most crises are rooted in fear; this one was driven by greed.
The market peaked in March of 2000. It wasn’t a big bang, and no single event caused the unraveling. High profile
bankruptcies and 9/11 were contributing factors, but overall it was a slow, steady erosion, ultimately culminating in
a peak-to-trough drop of 78% for the tech-heavy Nasdaq. It took 15 years for the index to reach its prior peak.
From all these lessons, I draw one conclusion. Active and engaged stock selection is key to long-term investing success.
When volatility started to pick up in U.S. credit markets in 2000, I had recently started a new job managing global
credit portfolios at an asset management firm. Markets were focused on increased corporate leverage and the specter
of rating downgrades. When I look back on the 2000-02 period, I see clear similarities to the current environment –
“leverage” and “fallen angels” are hardly unfamiliar concepts these days — but also important differences.
Lisa Coleman
Several factors were specific to the earlier era. First were the effects of the 1990s deregulation of the telecom
Head of Global industry (leading to significant overcapacity) and the California electricity market. Elements of this deregulation
Investment Grade helped set the stage for instances of corporate malfeasance, which resulted in the collapse of Enron and Worldcom.
Corporate Credit (I remember one stressful weekend following our decision to sell Enron based on our mounting concerns about the
company’s operations. We decided to hold off on selling the euro-denominated debt, expecting a higher price on
Monday. Indeed, we did sell at close to par, and weeks before the company collapsed.) Another defining event of
that era was the shock of 9/11. In the end, the 2001-02 period saw an unprecedented number of fallen angels as the
economy slipped into recession.
U.S. corporations entered that recession with stretched balance sheets, but after leverage peaked in 2002 it then
came down steadily. And here’s where I see a key divergence from the current cycle. Companies entered the 2020
recession with higher leverage than at the 2002 peak, and they will likely emerge into the next cycle with even
more debt on their balance sheets.
We do not expect a V-shaped recovery, and in a less than robust economic environment companies may remain
considerably more leveraged than in past cycles. At the same time, though, the Federal Reserve will, for the first time,
buy bonds of certain fallen angels (companies with investment grade ratings as of March 22), thus providing a market
backstop. On balance, we may be living with a lower quality investment universe for quite some time to come.
In 1999, as the tech boom roared, I was fresh out of university, a newly minted portfolio manager on the European
behavioral finance equities team. Having studied the various principles of valuation, I was interested to see that a
discounted cash flow could easily justify any share price as long as your forecasts were optimistic enough and your
terminal value was suitably extravagant.
Katy Thorneycroft
As the cycle neared its peak, I was concentrating on mid and small cap companies. Looking back, I see that I was
Portfolio Manager, very lucky to be working for an experienced portfolio manager who had seen several bear markets in his time. He
Multi-Asset Solutions kept me focused on corporate cash flows and balance sheets.
Two lessons from the 2000-02 bear market have stayed with me. First, bear market rallies can be brutal. In 2001, I
recall, the FTSE fell by 15% overall, but there was a 20% rally in the final months of the year. We won’t know for
some time whether the recent rally this year is in fact a bear market episode. Depending on how you are positioned,
a bear market rally can make you a hero or … something else altogether. In my early years in the business, I
learned that it helps to keep true to your investment framework while remaining humble enough to shift course
when the evidence changes.
Second, I learned that investors may overlook valuations for a period of time, but it’s rarely a permanent condition.
Value stocks had been somewhat out of fashion in the later stages of the late 1990s bull market. But once the bear
market ended in 2003 and the stage was set for a reacceleration of growth, investors had the luxury of being more
price sensitive. Again, only time will tell, but if the next cycle delivers higher levels of nominal growth, it could
provide a tailwind for long-beleaguered value stocks.
1987 crash: Bank training grad sees first black swan event
“By definition, black swan events are low probability occurrences.
But over the past 30-plus years, they seem to arrive with some regularity.”
I was a few weeks out of the training program at J.P. Morgan when the stock market crashed on October 19, 1987,
Black Monday. My desk in the old headquarters at 23 Wall Street looked out on the floor of the New York Stock
Exchange. “What have I gotten myself into?” I asked myself.
Patrik Jakobson
At the time, the double-dip recessions of the early 1980s were fresh in people’s minds and a downturn seemed
Portfolio Manager, inevitable. But the stock market regained its previous highs in less than a year and a U.S. recession did not arrive
Multi-Asset Solutions for several years, not until 1990.
Coming into Black Monday, stocks were overvalued and investors were complacent. Portfolio insurance
“guaranteed” downside protection – until it didn’t. Portfolio insurance clearly exacerbated the 1987 sell-off. And
certainly there is an element of commonality in subsequent crises, with financial markets or financial engineering as
a causal or contributing factor.
In the normal course of things, it’s hard to think about left tail or black swan events. By definition, they are low
probability occurrences. But looking back over the past 30-plus years, these events seem to arrive with some
regularity: the Asian financial crisis and Long-Term Capital Management, the dot-com bust, the global financial
crisis, the sovereign debt crisis. Each had a slightly different contour, but each was a left tail event.
My younger colleagues find it difficult to imagine, but in October 1987 we worked without computers or cellphones.
Trading was manual and slow. Today, in the midst of a global pandemic, J.P. Morgan Asset Management is, in
essence, remotely run. That is remarkable – and a reminder to me of the fundamental resilience of the economy
and markets through all manner of crises.
For the countries bound together in Europe’s monetary union, the financial crisis did not end in 2009. Indeed, for
many it was just beginning. As government debt spiraled, investors soon shifted their attention from the question of
whether banks would go bust to whether sovereigns would default. As a sell-side economist during the sovereign
Karen Ward debt crisis (which ran from roughly 2010–12), I had to form a view on whether the end result would be a breakup of
Chief Market the eurozone.
Strategist, EMEA,
While every crisis is different, the analytical toolkit we use is essentially the same. From my perspective, crises are
Global Market
much like impressionist art. Get too close to the canvas and the art is impossible to fathom. But if you step back a
Insights Strategy
few paces, it all becomes much clearer.
In a crisis, it’s essential to consider the big picture. As an economist – and a student of history – I understood that
the eurozone was first and foremost a political union. In turn, the crisis was more about political commitment than
economics. Because I didn’t doubt Germany’s commitment to the project, I expected compromises would ultimately
be made, and they were. This was far more important than understanding the minutiae of the various bailout
packages.
And I learned that it is important to step back physically as well as mentally. In the sovereign crisis, policymakers
made key decisions late on a Sunday night or in the early hours of Monday morning following a eurogroup meeting.
Staying awake to cover the press conference followed by a whole day of client meetings was physically as well as
mentally draining. Finding a way to recuperate is essential for making clear, rational decisions.
Finally, while it’s important to have a clear view, it’s equally important to challenge that view. Team culture is critical
here. Healthy debate is essential at all times, but never more so than in a crisis, when both the emotions and the
stakes run high.
From the crucible of the 2008 crisis, the expansion and evolution of real assets
“Financial crises produce winners and losers.
The real asset winners had contractual cash flows and strong counterparties.”
“Build it and they will come” was the motto of real estate investing across global markets leading up to the 2008
crisis. Working in the Middle East, I witnessed the development boom that produced some of the world’s largest
structures. Although the global financial crisis was not directly connected to emerging markets, it exposed
Pulkit Sharma, vulnerabilities that led to a prolonged real estate bust as development projects were stalled or scrapped altogether.
CFA, CAIA
In the U.S., unlike the dot-com crash where real estate values were unscathed, the 2008 mortgage meltdown
Head of Alternatives created ripple effects across private and public real estate. Cracks first appeared in real estate credit markets,
Investment Strategy which impacted public and then private real estate. Transaction volumes decreased, and a heightened need for
and Solutions liquidity led to an increase in private fund redemption queues as investors sought to withdraw capital wherever
available.
Financial crises produce winners and losers. The winners had exposures to inelastic demand sectors, contractual
cash flows and strong counterparties. Low leverage private core debt and primary markets core real estate equity
fared better than higher leverage debt, public and noncore private real estate. This period also saw the emergence
of infrastructure as an asset class. Its similar, albeit noncorrelated and more defensive, return profile relative to real
estate made it a suitable complement.
Each crisis reshapes the industry it impacts, and the global financial crisis sparked a wave of innovation and
opportunities for the next decade. These included the rise of infill logistics, renewable energy and globalization of
real estate, and the emergence of regulation-driven asset classes such as transport leasing and mezzanine real
estate. Over the long term, the safe haven characteristics of high quality cash flows of real estate and infrastructure
will remain important sources of income and diversification, and investors should be on the lookout for new sources
of sustainable innovation to further expand and evolve their exposure to real assets.
In the summer of 2007, I was a client portfolio manager at J.P. Morgan, leading our behavioral finance/quantitative
equities product team. In those days, quants ruled, investment performance was strong and we had just launched
our first long-short product. Then everything changed, seemingly overnight. The first two weeks of August – the
lead-up to the global financial crisis, as it later became clear – delivered broad-scale liquidations. Overly levered
Ted Dimig quant strategies’ returns plunged (a 5+ standard deviation event) and as a result experienced sizable redemptions.
Head of U.S. What had been up was now down. Our first instinct was to think that this was a temporary blip and we should thus
Advisory and Core stay disciplined. But we quickly understood that chaos now ruled the quant world, and investors did not like chaos.
Beta Solutions, While the quants would ultimately reemerge stronger in the wake of this experience, in the subsequent two years, it
Multi-Asset Solutions is estimated, nearly 80% of quant strategy assets were liquidated.
My main takeaway from this difficult period? Plainly put, “There is never just one cockroach.” What was happening
in the quant space proved to be an early warning sign of the financial stresses across much of the global economy.
In other words, it was one of the first but by no means the only cockroach. As a crisis emerges, it’s human nature to
find patterns that resemble prior episodes. But in reality, each crisis is different. Today I push myself to take a multi-
faceted view of the market and economic environment and try to focus on what’s different from the past. While a
historical perspective is helpful, too narrow a focus can turn into tunnel vision. Then you miss the fact that there are
a lot more cockroaches that warrant investigation.
I began my finance career in 2004, so the 2008 global financial crisis was my first experience with live market
disruptions. As a quant investor, I could see that implementation decisions such as improper risk sizing and leverage
overwhelmed otherwise “correct” portfolio views and positions. I learned that the true power of a robust investment
Katherine Santiago process is its ability to manage through cycles of underperformance, recalibrate to new information and risk, and
Head of Quantitative establish better positioning for the next market phase.
Research,
Multi-Asset Solutions Understanding the limitations and biases of your models and processes can help you navigate your response to severe
dislocations. Models based more heavily on valuations may be significantly early in signaling a market peak, whereas
those based on technicals may take longer to register a turning point. Depending on the model, an investor can
evaluate the necessary speed of a response and decide whether to lean into the downturn or rebound of an event.
From a quant investing perspective, our reliance on data is a humbling element of any market dislocation. In 2008,
so many of our data series, such as Libor or other liquidity measures, which had worked reliably in prior periods,
began to fail as liquidity and market stresses impacted not only market prices but the financial system itself. This
meant that our models had difficulty interpreting the reality of current market conditions and thus could not predict
where markets were headed. Being able to understand your data, its limitations and their exact impact on your
models is essential to navigating these types of market events. In the current crisis, economic data will be equally
challenged to keep up with the fast pace of the economy’s sudden stop and the pace (as yet unknown) of the
economy’s eventual restart. Finding new sources of data to help interpret economic activity can be useful, but
investors need to think carefully before jumping into anything new and untested.
Past crises reinforce the lesson—It’s not (essentially) different this time
“I am repeatedly amazed by how resilient economies and markets are.”
On October 19, 1987, when the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 22.6%, the biggest single-day percentage decline in
U.S. history, I was working as the head of an equity sales and trading desk in the Boston office of a bulge-bracket
investment banking firm. We handled dozens of convertible bond trades that day that were priced 25% or more
below the previous day’s close. Even then, those prices were only that day’s clearing bid, as talk of further steep
Anthony Werley declines in markets ahead made every trade a risky proposition. As investment professionals seeing the carnage in
Chief Investment markets, we were convinced something important was afoot that would change markets for a long time.
Officer,
The next 32 years included other frightening market episodes: the 1998 crisis precipitated by the collapse of the
Endowments &
Russian ruble and hedge fund Long-Term Capital Management, the 2000 technology stock bust and the economic
Foundations Group
and market meltdown of the global financial crisis. Looking back, a pattern seems to emerge: Shock around a
completely unexpected (but still probable) event lends itself to wide-ranging explanations of possible outcomes that
eventually narrow as events evolve and policymakers address the crisis as best they can.
Although the 1987 crash turned out to have no significant economic impact, financial market participants, including
investors and managers, learned valuable lessons. “Portfolio insurance,” at the time the latest technique to hedge
portfolios, was discredited – and then resurfaced in other forms over the subsequent decades. And in some ways,
large investor redemptions during the 1987 crash paved the way for the market’s bull run in the 1990s.
The current crisis will have significant repercussions over the next couple of years, especially since a serious public
health crisis is unfolding along with an important economic and market event. But I am repeatedly amazed by how
resilient economies and markets are. The events of 2020 are likely to accelerate changes that are already underway
but not radically alter their basic course.
In 2008, I watched the global financial crisis unfold from the vantage point of a derivatives desk. What has always
struck me about the acute phase of a market dislocation is how eerily quiet dealing floors become – in stark
contrast to images in the media. Asset markets may be doing somersaults, but often trading is paralyzed and the
John Bilton, CFA most frantic activity occurs behind office doors as the scale of the impact is assessed.
Head of Global Multi-
Derivatives are often associated with hedging, but the complexity of some instruments compromised their
Asset Strategy,
effectiveness – for instance, increased counterparty risk following the collapse of Lehman Brothers impaired the
Multi-Asset Solutions
value of some hedges by far more than price action in the underlying asset. Ultimately, in any market dislocation
cash is the most prized asset. Hedges are important – but they need to be simple, liquid and effective, since
converting them back into cash is critical.
In a bear market, the initial shock, where cash is in high demand, passes fairly quickly. A more drawn-out phase
then begins. Benjamin Graham noted that markets are “voting machines in the short run and weighing machines in
the long run.” The initial shock may be analogous to investors “voting” on whether sufficient cash is available, and
what follows is a weighing or calibration of the long-run impact on growth and valuations.
In the recent turmoil, central banks moved swiftly to flood markets with cash, and it is comforting that the initial
dislocation phase is calming down – even if the trajectory of the economy remains uncertain. Price discovery is now
possible, and the weighing phase can get underway. As the veteran of now four recessions and six major market
dislocations, I can clearly see that from bear markets are forged new economic expansions, new bull markets and
new investment opportunities.
U.S. Inflation
U.S. Intermediate
Treasuries
U.S. Securitized
TIPS
U.S. Long Treasuries 0.30 0.90 11.02 1.60 -0.19 0.05 0.80 1.00
AC Asia ex-Japan Equity 9.60 11.50 20.84 9.20 0.01 0.03 -0.18 -0.17 0.23 0.15 0.13 0.14 0.13 0.46 0.40 0.71 0.52 -0.13 0.28 -0.10 0.34 0.65 0.73 0.64 0.07 0.24 0.75
AC World Equity 8.10 9.18 15.46 6.50 0.06 -0.03 -0.28 -0.28 0.14 0.06 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.38 0.33 0.75 0.58 -0.23 0.23 -0.17 0.31 0.61 0.68 0.61 0.02 0.20 0.96
U.S. Equity Value Factor 9.80 10.88 15.59 7.20 0.03 -0.09 -0.31 -0.31 0.04 -0.02 0.00 -0.06 -0.03 0.27 0.23 0.70 0.53 -0.24 0.10 -0.18 0.17 0.48 0.55 0.49 -0.03 0.14 0.98
U.S. Equity Momentum Factor 7.80 8.76 14.52 5.40 0.10 -0.07 -0.33 -0.29 0.10 0.00 0.00 -0.07 -0.01 0.28 0.25 0.71 0.58 -0.26 0.09 -0.21 0.16 0.50 0.52 0.50 0.01 0.21 0.97
U.S. Equity Quality Factor 7.00 7.78 13.00 5.60 0.05 -0.06 -0.28 -0.27 0.08 0.02 0.02 -0.05 0.01 0.29 0.25 0.68 0.52 -0.21 0.14 -0.16 0.20 0.51 0.56 0.50 0.00 0.17 0.99
U.S. Equity Minimum Volatility Factor 6.10 6.70 11.37 5.80 0.03 -0.07 -0.21 -0.16 0.11 0.10 0.11 -0.02 0.10 0.34 0.32 0.68 0.51 -0.09 0.17 -0.04 0.22 0.54 0.58 0.50 0.08 0.22 0.94
U.S. Equity Dividend Yield Factor 8.40 9.29 14.05 6.90 0.04 -0.08 -0.24 -0.20 0.13 0.09 0.09 -0.01 0.08 0.36 0.33 0.72 0.55 -0.14 0.17 -0.09 0.23 0.56 0.60 0.53 0.10 0.22 0.95
U.S. Equity Diversified Factor 8.90 9.67 13.08 6.30 0.08 -0.08 -0.29 -0.26 0.10 0.03 0.03 -0.05 0.02 0.31 0.28 0.71 0.56 -0.20 0.12 -0.14 0.19 0.53 0.57 0.52 0.04 0.20 0.98
U.S. Convertible Bond hedged 7.20 7.72 10.62 4.60 0.08 -0.09 -0.30 -0.27 0.18 0.08 0.09 0.03 0.03 0.42 0.34 0.81 0.65 -0.22 0.12 -0.17 0.19 0.58 0.55 0.61 0.10 0.28 0.87
Global Convertible Bond 7.50 7.99 10.36 4.80 0.04 -0.06 -0.32 -0.28 0.15 0.08 0.09 0.05 0.05 0.45 0.37 0.82 0.65 -0.22 0.11 -0.16 0.18 0.62 0.58 0.66 0.10 0.27 0.86
Global Credit Sensitive Convertible 7.10 7.33 7.00 4.40 0.15 -0.03 -0.13 -0.20 -0.01 -0.02 -0.10 -0.04 0.01 0.18 0.18 0.28 0.34 -0.10 0.06 -0.06 0.10 0.18 0.19 0.24 -0.06 0.20 0.39
Private Equity 9.80 11.58 20.17 8.80 0.19 0.04 -0.49 -0.54 0.04 -0.23 -0.17 -0.14 -0.31 0.18 0.04 0.67 0.63 -0.49 -0.05 -0.44 0.04 0.49 0.51 0.55 -0.07 0.33 0.73
U.S. Core Real Estate 6.60 7.17 11.07 5.80 0.34 -0.08 -0.37 -0.32 0.03 -0.19 -0.13 -0.25 -0.19 0.08 0.01 0.51 0.60 -0.36 -0.19 -0.32 -0.14 0.30 0.29 0.39 -0.19 0.44 0.53
U.S. Value-Added Real Estate 8.70 10.02 17.18 7.70 0.34 -0.08 -0.37 -0.32 0.03 -0.19 -0.13 -0.25 -0.19 0.08 0.01 0.51 0.60 -0.36 -0.19 -0.32 -0.14 0.30 0.29 0.39 -0.19 0.44 0.53
European ex-UK Core Real Estate 7.50 8.67 16.04 6.90 0.32 0.01 -0.52 -0.53 0.06 -0.29 -0.24 -0.19 -0.33 0.11 -0.01 0.62 0.63 -0.53 -0.02 -0.49 0.07 0.40 0.44 0.49 -0.16 0.35 0.58
Asia Pacific Core Real Estate 7.50 8.20 12.36 6.50 0.30 -0.05 -0.32 -0.26 0.19 -0.01 0.01 -0.12 -0.02 0.33 0.26 0.63 0.63 -0.31 0.09 -0.28 0.15 0.50 0.48 0.53 0.03 0.45 0.64
U.S. REITs 8.00 9.07 15.42 6.00 -0.02 -0.05 -0.01 0.06 0.23 0.27 0.27 0.07 0.26 0.43 0.41 0.61 0.36 0.09 0.26 0.11 0.28 0.55 0.55 0.46 0.19 0.25 0.72
A LT E R N A TI V E S
Global Infrastructure Equity 6.70 7.21 10.46 6.00 0.22 -0.04 -0.27 -0.31 0.19 -0.03 0.02 0.00 -0.10 0.26 0.16 0.55 0.55 -0.28 0.17 -0.25 0.25 0.50 0.49 0.50 0.05 0.28 0.47
Global Infrastructure Debt 3.70 3.90 6.46 3.30 0.10 -0.03 0.31 0.48 0.66 0.63 0.55 0.35 0.63 0.83 0.76 0.43 0.31 0.41 0.30 0.37 0.25 0.64 0.29 0.70 0.49 0.56 0.08
Diversified Hedge Funds 5.00 5.26 7.37 4.50 0.22 0.06 -0.42 -0.33 0.11 -0.10 -0.11 -0.12 -0.08 0.25 0.19 0.60 0.65 -0.35 -0.07 -0.30 -0.01 0.39 0.35 0.45 -0.06 0.40 0.67
Event Driven Hedge Funds 5.70 6.08 9.02 4.80 0.21 -0.03 -0.45 -0.45 0.07 -0.11 -0.10 -0.07 -0.13 0.28 0.20 0.77 0.75 -0.41 0.01 -0.34 0.09 0.47 0.49 0.55 -0.06 0.33 0.79
Long Bias Hedge Funds 5.50 6.07 11.05 4.80 0.13 -0.03 -0.39 -0.40 0.09 -0.05 -0.06 -0.01 -0.07 0.31 0.24 0.75 0.65 -0.35 0.11 -0.30 0.20 0.51 0.58 0.55 -0.05 0.22 0.86
Relative Value Hedge Funds 5.50 5.72 6.79 4.50 0.25 -0.03 -0.40 -0.37 0.18 0.00 0.02 -0.01 -0.04 0.40 0.30 0.84 0.84 -0.35 -0.02 -0.29 0.05 0.55 0.50 0.61 0.06 0.46 0.68
Macro Hedge Funds 3.60 3.89 7.78 3.30 -0.10 0.15 0.12 0.10 0.24 0.20 0.11 0.26 0.20 0.29 0.27 0.18 0.05 0.16 0.32 0.18 0.33 0.23 0.30 0.19 0.11 0.10 0.25
Direct Lending 8.50 9.37 13.87 7.00 0.38 -0.11 -0.49 -0.48 0.14 -0.22 -0.12 -0.23 -0.29 0.07 -0.03 0.67 0.72 -0.47 -0.26 -0.41 -0.19 0.39 0.27 0.47 -0.04 0.39 0.54
Commodities 4.50 5.71 16.13 2.50 0.28 0.07 -0.14 -0.23 0.29 0.02 -0.01 0.10 -0.03 0.24 0.17 0.46 0.39 -0.25 0.28 -0.26 0.33 0.39 0.49 0.43 -0.11 0.16 0.45
Gold 3.00 4.46 17.63 3.00 0.02 0.08 0.36 0.27 0.47 0.40 0.37 0.38 0.31 0.37 0.30 0.10 -0.09 0.25 0.51 0.20 0.50 0.35 0.40 0.32 0.23 0.09 -0.03
Source: J.P. Morgan Asset Management; as of March 31, 2020. Please note that LTCMA return numbers are now rounded to the nearest 0.1% (having been nearest 0.25% in
previous years). Alternative asset classes (including hedge funds, private equity, real estate, direct lending and infrastructure) are unlike other asset categories shown above
in that there is no underlying investible index. The return estimates for these alternative asset classes and strategies are estimates of the industry average, net of manager
fees. The dispersion of return among managers of these asset classes and strategies is typically significantly wider than that of traditional asset classes. Correlations of value-
added and core real estate in their local currencies are identical since value-added local returns are scaled versions of their corresponding core real estate local returns. All
returns are nominal. For the full opportunity set, please contact your J.P. Morgan representative.
U.S. Mid Cap
Japanese Equity
1.00
0.95 1.00
EAFE Equity hedged
UK Large Cap
0.75 0.66 0.80 0.68 0.91 0.80 0.76 0.85 0.98 1.00
U.S. Convertible Bond hedged
0.93 0.85 0.93 0.78 0.80 0.93 0.91 0.97 0.89 0.87 1.00
Global Credit Sensitive Convertible
0.97 0.93 0.82 0.68 0.64 0.80 0.86 0.85 0.73 0.72 0.93 1.00
0.97 0.90 0.82 0.68 0.71 0.82 0.86 0.86 0.78 0.77 0.94 0.93 1.00
Global Convertible Bond
0.96 0.91 0.83 0.67 0.68 0.83 0.86 0.86 0.75 0.74 0.94 0.97 0.97 1.00
0.92 0.87 0.77 0.62 0.63 0.77 0.81 0.81 0.70 0.69 0.89 0.93 0.92 0.95 1.00
U.S. Value-Added Real Estate
0.95 0.90 0.79 0.65 0.66 0.80 0.83 0.84 0.74 0.72 0.91 0.96 0.92 0.96 0.97 1.00
European ex-UK Core Real Estate
U.S. Core Real Estate
0.98 0.92 0.82 0.68 0.68 0.81 0.86 0.86 0.75 0.74 0.94 0.97 0.97 0.98 0.97 0.97 1.00
Private Equity
0.91 0.83 0.80 0.70 0.75 0.81 0.83 0.85 0.81 0.81 0.90 0.86 0.90 0.86 0.80 0.85 0.88 1.00
Asia Pacific Core Real Estate
0.88 0.79 0.85 0.74 0.80 0.85 0.89 0.89 0.84 0.84 0.91 0.84 0.88 0.85 0.79 0.83 0.86 0.97 1.00
0.36 0.31 0.38 0.32 0.31 0.44 0.41 0.41 0.30 0.29 0.40 0.34 0.38 0.36 0.32 0.33 0.35 0.36 0.38 1.00
Global Infrastructure Equity
0.75 0.69 0.75 0.54 0.72 0.80 0.71 0.77 0.80 0.76 0.80 0.70 0.75 0.72 0.64 0.68 0.72 0.77 0.79 0.30 1.00
Global Infrastructure Debt
0.54 0.51 0.38 0.40 0.36 0.49 0.47 0.45 0.42 0.40 0.50 0.54 0.51 0.51 0.56 0.55 0.54 0.43 0.41 0.31 0.49 1.00
0.54 0.51 0.38 0.40 0.36 0.49 0.47 0.45 0.42 0.40 0.50 0.54 0.51 0.51 0.56 0.55 0.54 0.43 0.41 0.31 0.49 1.00 1.00
Diversified Hedge Funds
U.S. REITs
0.62 0.53 0.67 0.50 0.55 0.73 0.59 0.69 0.70 0.64 0.68 0.56 0.60 0.57 0.49 0.55 0.58 0.68 0.68 0.23 0.84 0.56 0.56 1.00
0.67 0.55 0.62 0.54 0.58 0.68 0.60 0.67 0.66 0.63 0.69 0.62 0.66 0.62 0.63 0.65 0.65 0.64 0.63 0.49 0.60 0.75 0.75 0.67 1.00
Relative Value Hedge Funds
Long Bias Hedge Funds
0.75 0.73 0.63 0.51 0.47 0.59 0.62 0.65 0.55 0.55 0.69 0.74 0.69 0.73 0.80 0.80 0.75 0.64 0.60 0.19 0.43 0.61 0.61 0.38 0.61 1.00
0.45 0.38 0.54 0.39 0.59 0.59 0.40 0.55 0.60 0.56 0.55 0.44 0.47 0.44 0.40 0.43 0.44 0.48 0.47 0.07 0.62 0.47 0.47 0.62 0.51 0.34 1.00
0.11 0.01 0.14 0.15 0.27 0.21 0.10 0.18 0.24 0.27 0.15 0.06 0.10 0.08 0.15 0.15 0.12 0.25 0.26 0.08 0.18 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.28 0.25 0.25 1.00
Macro Hedge Funds
0.69 0.59 0.64 0.60 0.63 0.73 0.73 0.71 0.69 0.67 0.73 0.61 0.74 0.64 0.59 0.60 0.67 0.74 0.78 0.43 0.77 0.46 0.46 0.68 0.61 0.34 0.41 0.23 1.00
0.83 0.76 0.76 0.66 0.69 0.82 0.81 0.82 0.77 0.74 0.85 0.78 0.82 0.77 0.70 0.76 0.79 0.84 0.86 0.50 0.80 0.56 0.56 0.73 0.69 0.50 0.47 0.14 0.86 1.00
Direct Lending
0.89 0.82 0.83 0.74 0.80 0.86 0.85 0.89 0.88 0.86 0.93 0.84 0.90 0.85 0.77 0.81 0.86 0.90 0.92 0.42 0.82 0.46 0.46 0.70 0.66 0.54 0.52 0.10 0.85 0.93 1.00
Commodities
0.73 0.63 0.67 0.63 0.70 0.76 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.72 0.76 0.68 0.72 0.66 0.63 0.68 0.69 0.80 0.83 0.43 0.76 0.55 0.55 0.69 0.68 0.45 0.52 0.32 0.84 0.92 0.86 1.00
0.24 0.14 0.31 0.27 0.30 0.33 0.26 0.34 0.38 0.36 0.33 0.19 0.29 0.25 0.23 0.22 0.24 0.29 0.33 0.14 0.30 -0.08 -0.08 0.21 0.11 0.12 0.06 0.18 0.54 0.31 0.40 0.29 1.00
0.61 0.53 0.43 0.32 0.44 0.53 0.54 0.48 0.54 0.48 0.55 0.53 0.61 0.53 0.49 0.53 0.57 0.65 0.64 0.24 0.65 0.54 0.54 0.61 0.59 0.31 0.39 0.15 0.63 0.70 0.66 0.74 0.04 1.00
Gold
0.47 0.38 0.47 0.36 0.47 0.60 0.36 0.54 0.60 0.52 0.55 0.41 0.49 0.43 0.37 0.43 0.43 0.50 0.47 0.28 0.58 0.38 0.38 0.59 0.55 0.26 0.47 0.17 0.55 0.58 0.60 0.56 0.40 0.51 1.00
-0.01 -0.06 0.06 -0.02 0.22 0.10 -0.13 0.08 0.23 0.19 0.07 -0.05 0.01 -0.01 0.00 0.01 -0.01 0.09 0.09 -0.01 0.06 -0.03 -0.03 0.04 0.21 0.04 0.15 0.33 0.10 0.05 0.12 0.07 0.40 0.05 0.43 1.00
UK Cash
Compound Return March 2020 (%)
hedged
hedged
Euro Aggregate Bonds hedged 2.50 2.56 3.54 2.20 -0.20 0.09 0.65 1.00
UK Inflation-Linked Bonds
Euro Area Small Cap hedged 7.80 9.15 17.32 7.30 0.04 -0.20 -0.04 0.01 0.30 0.44 0.38 0.69 0.74 0.32 0.61 -0.09 -0.23 -0.01 -0.27 -0.37 -0.26 -0.37 0.47 0.23
Japanese Equity 6.40 7.21 13.26 5.70 -0.07 -0.08 0.12 0.12 0.32 0.33 0.30 0.40 0.34 0.33 0.25 0.07 0.03 0.18 -0.01 0.10 -0.01 0.11 0.32 0.45
Japanese Equity hedged 8.10 9.58 18.16 7.20 0.08 -0.19 -0.20 -0.09 0.12 0.28 0.20 0.51 0.51 0.13 0.49 -0.16 -0.33 -0.08 -0.38 -0.55 -0.37 -0.54 0.29 0.09
AC Asia ex-Japan Equity 7.80 9.31 18.34 7.70 -0.01 -0.02 0.21 0.13 0.45 0.43 0.36 0.61 0.54 0.46 0.38 0.05 0.03 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.59
Emerging Markets Equity 8.70 10.21 18.46 7.70 0.05 -0.03 0.18 0.08 0.42 0.40 0.34 0.64 0.56 0.43 0.41 0.00 -0.01 0.20 -0.05 -0.02 -0.04 -0.01 0.65 0.63
AC World Equity 6.30 7.13 13.39 5.00 0.05 -0.11 0.12 0.09 0.35 0.39 0.37 0.61 0.53 0.37 0.40 0.02 0.00 0.21 -0.06 0.05 -0.06 0.05 0.54 0.57
AC World ex-UK Equity 6.20 7.05 13.57 5.00 0.04 -0.11 0.12 0.09 0.34 0.38 0.37 0.60 0.52 0.37 0.39 0.02 0.01 0.22 -0.06 0.06 -0.06 0.07 0.53 0.58
Developed World Equity 6.10 6.91 13.21 4.80 0.04 -0.12 0.11 0.09 0.32 0.38 0.37 0.59 0.51 0.35 0.39 0.02 0.01 0.21 -0.06 0.06 -0.06 0.06 0.50 0.55
Global Convertible Bond hedged 7.60 8.09 10.31 4.70 -0.02 -0.11 0.07 0.05 0.44 0.52 0.37 0.81 0.77 0.43 0.65 -0.07 -0.22 -0.01 -0.24 -0.39 -0.23 -0.39 0.61 0.29
Global Credit Sensitive Convertible hedged 7.20 7.43 7.11 4.30 0.12 -0.26 -0.07 0.07 0.16 0.33 0.36 0.24 0.36 0.21 0.32 -0.02 -0.18 -0.08 -0.15 -0.20 -0.14 -0.20 0.17 0.01
Private Equity 8.00 9.19 16.22 7.30 0.14 -0.16 -0.23 -0.21 0.05 0.18 0.20 0.44 0.41 0.07 0.39 -0.30 -0.25 0.07 -0.35 -0.22 -0.36 -0.22 0.27 0.15
U.S. Core Real Estate 4.80 5.31 10.43 4.30 0.43 -0.42 -0.19 -0.17 -0.01 0.15 0.25 0.39 0.36 0.04 0.51 -0.24 -0.22 0.14 -0.29 -0.43 -0.28 -0.44 0.19 -0.11
European ex-UK Core Real Estate 5.70 6.55 13.54 5.40 0.25 -0.33 -0.36 -0.28 -0.08 0.02 0.02 0.37 0.32 -0.09 0.40 -0.33 -0.41 0.03 -0.44 -0.32 -0.43 -0.32 0.15 -0.09
European ex-UK Value-Added Real Estate 8.40 10.26 20.54 7.90 0.29 -0.37 -0.41 -0.34 -0.09 0.02 0.02 0.45 0.39 -0.11 0.51 -0.39 -0.47 0.00 -0.52 -0.48 -0.51 -0.49 0.17 -0.20
UK Core Real Estate 6.30 7.50 16.19 5.50 0.28 -0.36 -0.36 -0.33 -0.11 0.01 -0.03 0.45 0.40 -0.12 0.59 -0.37 -0.44 -0.10 -0.50 -0.70 -0.48 -0.71 0.14 -0.40
U.S. REITs 6.20 7.41 16.27 4.50 0.07 -0.15 0.27 0.21 0.33 0.32 0.42 0.46 0.33 0.39 0.23 0.17 0.24 0.38 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.42 0.48
A LT E R NA T I VE S
European REITs 6.40 7.92 18.29 5.90 0.01 -0.15 0.23 0.24 0.39 0.46 0.48 0.55 0.50 0.45 0.30 0.17 0.11 0.24 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.54 0.43
Global Infrastructure Equity 4.90 5.32 9.48 4.50 0.03 -0.11 0.13 0.14 0.04 0.03 0.17 -0.05 -0.06 0.09 -0.04 0.14 0.28 0.37 0.16 0.26 0.15 0.23 0.07 0.21
Mezzanine Debt 6.90 7.58 12.18 6.30 -0.10 -0.01 0.34 0.26 0.40 0.33 0.32 0.40 0.31 0.41 0.26 0.20 0.29 0.44 0.23 0.45 0.22 0.44 0.35 0.52
Diversified Hedge Funds hedged 5.10 5.35 7.28 4.40 0.18 -0.16 -0.12 -0.11 0.21 0.33 0.30 0.59 0.64 0.22 0.64 -0.22 -0.31 0.00 -0.37 -0.50 -0.35 -0.51 0.37 0.05
Event Driven Hedge Funds hedged 5.80 6.18 8.99 4.70 0.16 -0.18 -0.13 -0.13 0.25 0.41 0.31 0.76 0.78 0.25 0.75 -0.27 -0.37 -0.04 -0.43 -0.52 -0.42 -0.52 0.45 0.15
Long Bias Hedge Funds hedged 5.60 6.17 11.00 4.70 0.07 -0.11 -0.07 -0.11 0.29 0.39 0.28 0.74 0.72 0.28 0.65 -0.23 -0.32 -0.06 -0.38 -0.48 -0.36 -0.47 0.50 0.24
Relative Value Hedge Funds hedged 5.60 5.81 6.75 4.40 0.12 -0.11 -0.01 -0.06 0.37 0.48 0.38 0.83 0.83 0.37 0.84 -0.20 -0.33 0.03 -0.36 -0.52 -0.34 -0.52 0.53 0.17
Macro Hedge Funds hedged 3.70 3.99 7.84 3.20 -0.08 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.29 0.25 0.25 0.16 0.17 0.29 0.04 0.16 0.13 0.15 0.16 0.08 0.16 0.08 0.22 0.18
Commodities 2.70 3.62 13.94 1.00 0.20 -0.02 0.08 -0.11 0.17 0.08 0.10 0.30 0.16 0.15 0.21 -0.16 -0.08 0.17 -0.10 0.08 -0.09 0.08 0.30 0.34
Gold 1.20 2.79 18.31 1.50 -0.11 0.17 0.43 0.22 0.29 0.08 0.14 -0.07 -0.17 0.28 -0.27 0.21 0.39 0.28 0.40 0.50 0.39 0.50 0.21 0.42
STERLING ASSUMPTIONS
Note: All estimates on this page are in sterling terms. Given the complex risk-reward trade-offs involved, we advise clients to rely on judgment as well as quantitative
optimization approaches in setting strategic allocations to all of these asset classes and strategies. Please note that all information shown is based on qualitative analysis.
Exclusive reliance on this information is not advised. This information is not intended as a recommendation to invest in any particular asset class or strategy or as a promise
of future performance. Note that these asset class and strategy assumptions are passive only–they do not consider the impact of active management. References to future
returns are not promises or even estimates of actual returns a client portfolio may achieve. Assumptions, opinions and estimates are provided for illustrative purposes only.
They should not be relied upon as recommendations to buy or sell securities. Forecasts of financial market trends that are based on current market conditions constitute our
judgment and are subject to change without notice. We believe the information provided here is reliable, but do not warrant its accuracy or completeness. This material has
been prepared for information purposes only and is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, accounting, legal or tax advice.
Source: J.P. Morgan Asset Management; as of March 31, 2020. Please note that LTCMA return numbers are now rounded to the nearest 0.1% (having been nearest 0.25% in
previous years). Alternative asset classes (including hedge funds, private equity, real estate, direct lending and infrastructure) are unlike other asset categories shown above
in that there is no underlying investible index. The return estimates for these alternative asset classes and strategies are estimates of the industry average, net of manager
fees. The dispersion of return among managers of these asset classes and strategies is typically significantly wider than that of traditional asset classes. Correlations of value-
added and core real estate in their local currencies are identical since value-added local returns are scaled versions of their corresponding core real estate local returns. All
returns are nominal. For the full opportunity set, please contact your J.P. Morgan representative.
Emerging Markets Corporate
Bonds hedged
UK All Cap
UK Large Cap
UK Small Cap
1.00
U.S. Large Cap
0.57 1.00
Euro Area Large Cap
0.52 0.83 0.79 0.89 0.61 0.79 0.81 0.92 0.88 1.00
Global Convertible Bond hedged
AC World ex-UK Equity
0.33 0.60 0.60 0.48 0.64 0.50 0.60 0.53 0.57 0.52 1.00
AC World Equity
0.36 0.61 0.59 0.61 0.48 0.67 0.57 0.71 0.54 0.67 0.69 1.00
0.58 0.74 0.73 0.62 0.67 0.66 0.74 0.64 0.74 0.64 0.57 0.48 1.00
European ex-UK Value-Added Real Estate
0.62 0.76 0.76 0.63 0.67 0.68 0.76 0.65 0.77 0.66 0.55 0.48 0.97 1.00
European ex-UK Core Real Estate
0.51 0.89 0.89 0.74 0.94 0.84 0.89 0.78 0.85 0.74 0.71 0.58 0.83 0.84 1.00
0.50 0.87 0.87 0.72 0.95 0.84 0.88 0.77 0.84 0.73 0.72 0.57 0.83 0.84 1.00 1.00
U.S. Core Real Estate
Private Equity
0.48 0.88 0.88 0.73 0.96 0.85 0.88 0.78 0.83 0.73 0.72 0.58 0.78 0.79 1.00 0.99 1.00
0.66 0.83 0.81 0.82 0.64 0.86 0.79 0.85 0.80 0.86 0.53 0.71 0.75 0.76 0.78 0.77 0.76 1.00
0.25 0.37 0.36 0.32 0.22 0.37 0.31 0.39 0.30 0.39 0.19 0.27 0.20 0.21 0.28 0.27 0.28 0.37 1.00
UK Core Real Estate
0.33 0.67 0.66 0.63 0.61 0.59 0.57 0.56 0.56 0.53 0.33 0.43 0.61 0.63 0.67 0.67 0.66 0.60 0.32 1.00
Global Infrastructure Equity
0.28 0.30 0.28 0.32 0.33 0.43 0.14 0.35 0.17 0.33 0.13 0.35 0.15 0.19 0.29 0.28 0.29 0.27 0.30 0.26 1.00
Diversified Hedge Funds hedged
0.26 0.49 0.48 0.48 0.34 0.40 0.39 0.40 0.46 0.45 0.21 0.39 0.33 0.41 0.42 0.41 0.41 0.48 0.27 0.70 0.36 1.00
European REITs
0.29 0.47 0.45 0.50 0.31 0.44 0.34 0.45 0.41 0.49 0.18 0.46 0.32 0.40 0.38 0.37 0.37 0.52 0.22 0.67 0.48 0.96 1.00
0.26 0.20 0.17 0.31 0.10 0.35 0.01 0.35 0.08 0.37 -0.03 0.41 0.10 0.15 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.39 0.00 0.30 0.64 0.50 0.70 1.00
Long Bias Hedge Funds hedged
0.33 0.57 0.57 0.45 0.74 0.56 0.56 0.47 0.54 0.43 0.47 0.26 0.50 0.51 0.70 0.71 0.72 0.43 0.06 0.31 0.54 0.23 0.22 0.14 1.00
0.44 0.71 0.69 0.69 0.57 0.62 0.74 0.67 0.74 0.66 0.41 0.38 0.50 0.52 0.66 0.65 0.66 0.59 0.27 0.38 0.31 0.38 0.34 0.08 0.67 1.00
Macro Hedge Funds hedged
0.01 0.05 0.07 -0.06 0.21 -0.02 0.02 -0.08 -0.08 -0.17 0.13 -0.07 0.03 0.06 0.15 0.15 0.15 -0.14 0.02 0.19 0.06 0.02 -0.03 -0.20 0.17 0.04 1.00
0.32 0.36 0.37 0.28 0.57 0.13 0.34 0.19 0.33 0.20 0.46 0.04 0.43 0.40 0.52 0.53 0.53 0.24 -0.06 0.33 0.07 0.16 0.10 -0.06 0.53 0.30 0.35 1.00
0.44 0.65 0.63 0.69 0.43 0.67 0.54 0.69 0.61 0.76 0.38 0.64 0.54 0.58 0.56 0.55 0.54 0.78 0.43 0.61 0.35 0.54 0.59 0.47 0.17 0.35 -0.12 0.06 1.00
0.55 0.74 0.71 0.77 0.52 0.79 0.64 0.76 0.70 0.83 0.40 0.66 0.60 0.64 0.65 0.64 0.63 0.86 0.49 0.62 0.45 0.55 0.60 0.47 0.31 0.48 -0.13 0.11 0.87 1.00
Commodities
0.55 0.78 0.75 0.78 0.58 0.86 0.72 0.80 0.75 0.84 0.47 0.70 0.72 0.75 0.73 0.72 0.71 0.92 0.40 0.61 0.32 0.46 0.51 0.38 0.33 0.50 -0.12 0.08 0.86 0.93 1.00
0.61 0.67 0.65 0.69 0.42 0.68 0.56 0.70 0.61 0.75 0.38 0.62 0.58 0.62 0.57 0.56 0.55 0.83 0.42 0.57 0.45 0.49 0.56 0.51 0.27 0.43 -0.06 0.22 0.84 0.92 0.86 1.00
0.19 0.30 0.31 0.21 0.14 0.22 0.27 0.22 0.29 0.26 0.18 0.12 0.32 0.34 0.27 0.26 0.25 0.31 0.16 0.30 -0.15 0.22 0.15 -0.13 0.03 0.15 0.01 0.00 0.53 0.29 0.37 0.28 1.00
Gold
0.32 0.40 0.42 0.25 0.33 0.29 0.29 0.16 0.32 0.19 0.19 0.09 0.39 0.48 0.41 0.41 0.39 0.30 0.16 0.37 0.18 0.36 0.32 0.08 0.23 0.19 0.08 0.28 0.36 0.37 0.39 0.36 0.34 1.00
0.14 -0.04 -0.02 -0.14 -0.01 -0.22 -0.05 -0.26 -0.01 -0.22 -0.04 -0.41 0.12 0.15 0.03 0.03 0.00 -0.11 -0.14 -0.11 -0.25 -0.23 -0.31 -0.40 0.09 -0.02 0.19 0.32 -0.11 -0.19 -0.12 -0.14 0.31 0.42 1.00
Euro Inflation
Euro Cash
hedged
1.30 1.32 1.81 1.30 1.00
Euro Cash 0.60 0.60 0.63 0.60 -0.15 1.00
hedged
1.70 1.76 3.45 1.80 -0.23 0.21 1.00
Japanese Equity 6.40 7.32 14.12 5.30 -0.07 -0.17 -0.05 0.07 0.23 0.36 0.40 0.46 0.44 -0.01 0.17 -0.18 0.11 -0.27 0.11 0.02 0.17 0.46
Japanese Equity hedged 7.00 8.44 17.83 6.00 0.10 -0.04 -0.17 -0.09 0.13 0.26 0.49 0.49 0.46 -0.15 0.17 -0.35 -0.51 -0.43 -0.53 -0.11 0.30 0.25
Emerging Markets Equity 8.70 10.00 17.07 7.30 0.06 -0.12 0.05 0.05 0.37 0.46 0.68 0.67 0.60 -0.06 0.28 -0.20 -0.23 -0.27 -0.26 0.10 0.55 0.61
AC Asia ex-Japan Equity 7.80 9.16 17.38 7.30 0.00 -0.12 0.08 0.09 0.39 0.48 0.64 0.64 0.56 -0.01 0.28 -0.15 -0.16 -0.22 -0.18 0.14 0.50 0.57
AC World Equity 6.30 7.09 13.06 4.60 0.02 -0.22 -0.06 0.05 0.26 0.45 0.63 0.68 0.63 -0.05 0.22 -0.25 -0.10 -0.35 -0.12 0.03 0.37 0.52
AC World ex-EMU Equity 6.10 6.89 13.07 4.50 0.02 -0.22 -0.07 0.05 0.25 0.44 0.61 0.66 0.62 -0.05 0.20 -0.25 -0.05 -0.35 -0.07 0.02 0.34 0.53
Developed World Equity 6.10 6.89 13.05 4.40 0.02 -0.23 -0.07 0.04 0.24 0.43 0.61 0.66 0.61 -0.05 0.21 -0.25 -0.08 -0.35 -0.10 0.02 0.33 0.49
Global Convertible Bond hedged 6.50 6.99 10.32 3.40 -0.01 -0.11 0.07 0.06 0.44 0.52 0.81 0.76 0.66 -0.06 0.31 -0.24 -0.47 -0.32 -0.51 0.12 0.61 0.34
Global Credit Sensitive Convertible hedged 6.00 6.22 6.88 3.10 0.00 -0.22 -0.02 0.10 0.18 0.34 0.28 0.40 0.32 0.02 0.08 -0.10 -0.17 -0.15 -0.19 0.05 0.17 0.11
Private Equity 8.00 9.59 18.85 6.90 0.22 -0.22 -0.29 -0.27 0.05 0.18 0.55 0.54 0.59 -0.37 -0.06 -0.47 -0.22 -0.48 -0.19 -0.26 0.29 0.34
U.S. Core Real Estate 4.80 5.63 13.32 3.90 0.18 -0.37 -0.14 -0.16 0.05 0.15 0.41 0.41 0.52 -0.23 -0.04 -0.27 0.05 -0.27 0.09 -0.13 0.21 0.43
European ex-UK Core Real Estate 5.70 6.33 11.60 5.00 0.19 -0.35 -0.37 -0.33 -0.04 0.05 0.51 0.49 0.62 -0.39 -0.12 -0.54 -0.22 -0.55 -0.19 -0.37 0.20 0.22
European ex-UK Value-Added Real Estate 8.40 9.95 18.64 7.50 0.19 -0.35 -0.37 -0.33 -0.04 0.05 0.51 0.49 0.62 -0.39 -0.12 -0.54 -0.22 -0.55 -0.19 -0.37 0.20 0.22
U.S. REITs 6.20 7.20 14.78 4.10 0.02 -0.19 0.20 0.19 0.31 0.37 0.45 0.39 0.33 0.15 0.30 0.12 0.13 0.06 0.12 0.26 0.33 0.48
Global ex-U.S. REITs 6.80 7.75 14.38 5.10 -0.03 -0.26 0.20 0.23 0.45 0.54 0.60 0.65 0.55 0.13 0.31 0.04 0.05 -0.04 0.01 0.29 0.50 0.58
A LT E R NA T I VE S
Global Infrastructure Equity 4.90 5.40 10.27 4.10 0.14 -0.21 -0.06 -0.08 0.04 0.08 0.30 0.31 0.41 -0.11 0.01 -0.16 0.21 -0.18 0.22 -0.05 0.18 0.37
Mezzanine Debt 6.90 7.70 13.18 5.90 -0.10 -0.13 0.10 0.19 0.27 0.37 0.36 0.41 0.44 0.11 0.16 0.02 0.50 -0.06 0.51 0.17 0.12 0.52
Diversified Hedge Funds hedged 4.00 4.25 7.24 3.20 0.07 -0.17 -0.10 -0.11 0.23 0.32 0.62 0.66 0.64 -0.21 0.13 -0.36 -0.43 -0.40 -0.44 -0.08 0.39 0.22
Event Driven Hedge Funds hedged 4.70 5.08 8.98 3.50 0.11 -0.18 -0.12 -0.13 0.26 0.40 0.78 0.78 0.76 -0.25 0.15 -0.42 -0.51 -0.46 -0.52 -0.08 0.47 0.27
Long Bias Hedge Funds hedged 4.50 5.07 10.99 3.50 0.07 -0.14 -0.07 -0.10 0.30 0.39 0.74 0.71 0.66 -0.21 0.19 -0.37 -0.56 -0.41 -0.58 -0.03 0.51 0.28
Relative Value Hedge Funds hedged 4.50 4.72 6.78 3.20 0.03 -0.08 0.01 -0.05 0.39 0.49 0.85 0.84 0.85 -0.19 0.21 -0.34 -0.40 -0.39 -0.41 0.04 0.54 0.37
Macro Hedge Funds hedged 2.60 2.89 7.79 2.00 -0.10 0.20 0.21 0.22 0.31 0.25 0.17 0.16 0.05 0.18 0.30 0.17 -0.03 0.16 -0.08 0.24 0.22 0.13
Commodities 2.70 3.60 13.73 0.60 0.08 -0.10 -0.08 -0.18 0.11 0.12 0.34 0.29 0.39 -0.24 0.04 -0.28 -0.06 -0.25 -0.03 -0.10 0.16 0.27
Gold 1.20 2.60 17.10 1.10 -0.17 0.09 0.30 0.17 0.23 0.11 -0.08 -0.11 -0.13 0.15 0.07 0.26 0.40 0.31 0.40 0.27 0.11 0.30
EURO ASSUMPTIONS
Note: All estimates on this page are in euro terms. Given the complex risk-reward trade-offs involved, we advise clients to rely on judgment as well as quantitative
optimization approaches in setting strategic allocations to all of these asset classes and strategies. Please note that all information shown is based on qualitative analysis.
Exclusive reliance on this information is not advised. This information is not intended as a recommendation to invest in any particular asset class or strategy or as a promise
of future performance. Note that these asset class and strategy assumptions are passive only–they do not consider the impact of active management. References to future
returns are not promises or even estimates of actual returns a client portfolio may achieve. Assumptions, opinions and estimates are provided for illustrative purposes only.
They should not be relied upon as recommendations to buy or sell securities. Forecasts of financial market trends that are based on current market conditions constitute our
judgment and are subject to change without notice. We believe the information provided here is reliable, but do not warrant its accuracy or completeness. This material has
been prepared for information purposes only and is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, accounting, legal or tax advice.
Source: J.P. Morgan Asset Management; as of March 31, 2020. Please note that LTCMA return numbers are now rounded to the nearest 0.1% (having been nearest 0.25% in
previous years). Alternative asset classes (including hedge funds, private equity, real estate, direct lending and infrastructure) are unlike other asset categories shown above
in that there is no underlying investible index. The return estimates for these alternative asset classes and strategies are estimates of the industry average, net of manager
fees. The dispersion of return among managers of these asset classes and strategies is typically significantly wider than that of traditional asset classes. Correlations of value-
added and core real estate in their local currencies are identical since value-added local returns are scaled versions of their corresponding core real estate local returns. All
returns are nominal. For the full opportunity set, please contact your J.P. Morgan representative.
Emerging Markets Corporate
1.00
Euro Area Large Cap
0.52 1.00
Euro Area Small Cap
0.27 0.62 0.58 0.68 0.43 0.54 0.53 0.65 0.43 1.00
AC World Equity
0.36 0.69 0.64 0.54 0.66 0.69 0.64 0.62 0.57 0.71 1.00
0.59 0.76 0.74 0.63 0.69 0.72 0.72 0.74 0.68 0.54 0.58 1.00
European ex-UK Value-Added Real Estate
0.56 0.74 0.72 0.65 0.65 0.69 0.69 0.72 0.63 0.57 0.56 0.96 1.00
European ex-UK Core Real Estate
0.44 0.91 0.85 0.94 0.82 0.84 0.80 0.90 0.75 0.74 0.67 0.81 0.81 1.00
0.42 0.88 0.82 0.96 0.79 0.79 0.75 0.88 0.72 0.75 0.64 0.80 0.80 1.00 1.00
U.S. Core Real Estate
Private Equity
0.41 0.91 0.83 0.96 0.81 0.83 0.78 0.89 0.74 0.75 0.66 0.76 0.75 1.00 0.99 1.00
0.67 0.85 0.85 0.62 0.85 0.85 0.87 0.75 0.80 0.50 0.69 0.80 0.77 0.79 0.76 0.76 1.00
0.24 0.44 0.42 0.28 0.39 0.42 0.43 0.40 0.38 0.23 0.25 0.29 0.27 0.37 0.34 0.36 0.40 1.00
Global Infrastructure Equity
0.40 0.67 0.67 0.70 0.57 0.60 0.58 0.72 0.53 0.49 0.50 0.70 0.69 0.75 0.75 0.73 0.63 0.15 1.00
Global ex-U.S. REITs
0.32 0.45 0.43 0.59 0.39 0.35 0.33 0.53 0.23 0.47 0.31 0.42 0.42 0.56 0.58 0.56 0.28 0.20 0.54 1.00
Event Driven Hedge Funds hedged
U.S. REITs
0.35 0.55 0.57 0.54 0.41 0.46 0.49 0.63 0.33 0.46 0.46 0.57 0.53 0.60 0.61 0.59 0.51 0.04 0.80 0.65 1.00
Relative Value Hedge Funds hedged
Long Bias Hedge Funds hedged
0.35 0.55 0.57 0.54 0.41 0.46 0.49 0.63 0.33 0.46 0.46 0.57 0.53 0.60 0.61 0.59 0.51 0.04 0.81 0.65 1.00 1.00
Mezzanine Debt
0.29 0.56 0.48 0.70 0.55 0.51 0.46 0.53 0.50 0.46 0.31 0.44 0.45 0.66 0.66 0.67 0.43 0.12 0.41 0.66 0.37 0.37 1.00
0.51 0.77 0.73 0.70 0.63 0.69 0.68 0.77 0.66 0.58 0.42 0.66 0.65 0.79 0.78 0.78 0.63 0.34 0.55 0.57 0.49 0.49 0.74 1.00
Macro Hedge Funds hedged
0.23 0.27 0.23 0.46 0.16 0.18 0.11 0.39 0.03 0.39 0.18 0.35 0.36 0.42 0.45 0.42 0.12 -0.20 0.52 0.59 0.52 0.52 0.37 0.31 1.00
0.21 0.39 0.36 0.65 0.12 0.26 0.24 0.51 0.19 0.59 0.17 0.37 0.43 0.58 0.62 0.60 0.22 0.02 0.56 0.55 0.54 0.54 0.55 0.53 0.64 1.00
0.46 0.73 0.79 0.53 0.68 0.69 0.77 0.70 0.62 0.46 0.64 0.71 0.66 0.69 0.67 0.67 0.79 0.42 0.67 0.35 0.59 0.59 0.24 0.52 0.17 0.18 1.00
0.57 0.79 0.84 0.58 0.79 0.76 0.83 0.74 0.71 0.45 0.65 0.74 0.68 0.74 0.71 0.71 0.87 0.50 0.66 0.42 0.58 0.58 0.35 0.58 0.15 0.19 0.87 1.00
Commodities
0.57 0.80 0.84 0.59 0.86 0.79 0.84 0.72 0.75 0.46 0.69 0.81 0.75 0.76 0.74 0.73 0.92 0.42 0.63 0.30 0.49 0.49 0.34 0.56 0.12 0.10 0.87 0.93 1.00
0.63 0.74 0.78 0.53 0.67 0.69 0.75 0.72 0.64 0.48 0.61 0.75 0.69 0.70 0.68 0.67 0.83 0.42 0.66 0.45 0.60 0.60 0.33 0.60 0.28 0.32 0.84 0.92 0.85 1.00
0.19 0.24 0.24 0.07 0.22 0.24 0.28 0.21 0.32 0.10 0.16 0.31 0.27 0.20 0.18 0.17 0.33 0.14 0.15 -0.15 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.18 -0.17 -0.10 0.53 0.29 0.38 0.28 1.00
Gold
0.26 0.32 0.31 0.32 0.26 0.20 0.22 0.45 0.28 0.23 0.18 0.45 0.38 0.40 0.42 0.37 0.31 0.19 0.48 0.43 0.50 0.50 0.16 0.32 0.31 0.32 0.47 0.44 0.42 0.47 0.28 1.00
0.13 -0.20 -0.17 -0.11 -0.27 -0.26 -0.22 -0.07 -0.15 -0.10 -0.35 0.03 0.02 -0.11 -0.07 -0.12 -0.14 -0.11 0.00 0.11 -0.01 -0.01 -0.01 0.00 0.21 0.20 -0.03 -0.14 -0.13 -0.06 0.26 0.36 1.00
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The Long-Term Capital Market Assumptions Team and Committee are grateful to many investment experts throughout the J.P. Morgan
network whose input has been incorporated into the 2020 Mark-to-market edition, including: Dave Esrig, Karthik Narayan, Kenneth Tsang,
Paul Kennedy, Justin Menne, Jason Desena, Joe Staines, Garrett Norman, Kent Zheng, Jonathan Blum, Stiofan De Burca and Paul Summer
We also want to express our utmost appreciation and gratitude to Global Creative Services for design, Mark Virgo and Jay Lonie.
PORTFOLIO INSIGHTS
NOT FOR RETAIL DISTRIBUTION: This communication has been prepared exclusively for institutional, wholesale, professional clients and qualified investors only,
as defined by local laws and regulations.
JPMAM Long-Term Capital Market Assumptions: Given the complex risk-reward trade-offs involved, we advise clients to rely on judgment as well as quantitative
optimization approaches in setting strategic allocations. Please note that all information shown is based on qualitative analysis. Exclusive reliance on the above is
not advised. This information is not intended as a recommendation to invest in any particular asset class or strategy or as a promise of future performance. Note
that these asset class and strategy assumptions are passive only – they do not consider the impact of active management. References to future returns are not
promises or even estimates of actual returns a client portfolio may achieve. Assumptions, opinions and estimates are provided for illustrative purposes only. They
should not be relied upon as recommendations to buy or sell securities. Forecasts of financial market trends that are based on current market conditions constitute
our judgment and are subject to change without notice. We believe the information provided here is reliable, but do not warrant its accuracy or completeness.
This material has been prepared for information purposes only and is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, accounting, legal or tax advice. The
outputs of the assumptions are provided for illustration/discussion purposes only and are subject to significant limitations. “Expected” or “alpha” return estimates
are subject to uncertainty and error. For example, changes in the historical data from which it is estimated will result in different implications for asset class returns.
Expected returns for each asset class are conditional on an economic scenario; actual returns in the event the scenario comes to pass could be higher or lower, as
they have been in the past, so an investor should not expect to achieve returns similar to the outputs shown herein. References to future returns for either asset
allocation strategies or asset classes are not promises of actual returns a client portfolio may achieve. Because of the inherent limitations of all models, potential
investors should not rely exclusively on the model when making a decision. The model cannot account for the impact that economic, market, and other factors may
have on the implementation and ongoing management of an actual investment portfolio. Unlike actual portfolio outcomes, the model outcomes do not reflect actual
trading, liquidity constraints, fees, expenses, taxes and other factors that could impact the future returns. The model assumptions are passive only – they do not
consider the impact of active management. A manager’s ability to achieve similar outcomes is subject to risk factors over which the manager may have no or limited
control. The views contained herein are not to be taken as advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any investment in any jurisdiction, nor is it a commitment from
J.P. Morgan Asset Management or any of its subsidiaries to participate in any of the transactions mentioned herein. Any forecasts, figures, opinions or investment
techniques and strategies set out are for information purposes only, based on certain assumptions and current market conditions and are subject to change without
prior notice. All information presented herein is considered to be accurate at the time of production. This material does not contain sufficient information to support
an investment decision and it should not be relied upon by you in evaluating the merits of investing in any securities or products. In addition, users should make
an independent assessment of the legal, regulatory, tax, credit and accounting implications and determine, together with their own professional advisers, if any
investment mentioned herein is believed to be suitable to their personal goals. Investors should ensure that they obtain all available relevant information before
making any investment. It should be noted that investment involves risks, the value of investments and the income from them may fluctuate in accordance with
market conditions and taxation agreements and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Both past performance and yield are not a reliable indicator of
current and future results.
J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide.
To the extent permitted by applicable law, we may record telephone calls and monitor electronic communications to comply with our legal and regulatory
obligations and internal policies. Personal data will be collected, stored and processed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management in accordance with our privacy policies at
https://am.jpmorgan.com/global/privacy.
This communication is issued by the following entities:
In the United States, by J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. or J.P. Morgan Alternative Asset Management, Inc., both regulated by the Securities and Exchange
Commission; in Latin America, for intended recipients’ use only, by local J.P. Morgan entities, as the case may be.; in Canada, for institutional clients’ use only, by
JPMorgan Asset Management (Canada) Inc., which is a registered Portfolio Manager and Exempt Market Dealer in all Canadian provinces and territories except
the Yukon and is also registered as an Investment Fund Manager in British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec and Newfoundland and Labrador. In the United Kingdom,
by JPMorgan Asset Management (UK) Limited, which is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority; in other European jurisdictions, by JPMorgan
Asset Management (Europe) S.à r.l. In Asia Pacific (“APAC”), by the following issuing entities and in the respective jurisdictions in which they are primarily regulated:
JPMorgan Asset Management (Asia Pacific) Limited, or JPMorgan Funds (Asia) Limited, or JPMorgan Asset Management Real Assets (Asia) Limited, each of which
is regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong; JPMorgan Asset Management (Singapore) Limited (Co. Reg. No. 197601586K), which this
advertisement or publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore; JPMorgan Asset Management (Taiwan) Limited; JPMorgan Asset
Management (Japan) Limited, which is a member of the Investment Trusts Association, Japan, the Japan Investment Advisers Association, Type II Financial Instruments
Firms Association and the Japan Securities Dealers Association and is regulated by the Financial Services Agency (registration number “Kanto Local Finance Bureau
(Financial Instruments Firm) No. 330”); in Australia, to wholesale clients only as defined in section 761A and 761G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Commonwealth), by
JPMorgan Asset Management (Australia) Limited (ABN 55143832080) (AFSL 376919).
For U.S. only: If you are a person with a disability and need additional support in viewing the material, please call us at 1-800-343-1113 for assistance.
Copyright 2020 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.
LV–JPM52180 | 04/20 | 0903c02a828a1164