Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Page 1 of 19
Final Draft – November 14, 2016
Page 2 of 19
Final Draft – November 14, 2016
Page 3 of 19
Final Draft – November 14, 2016
Page 4 of 19
Final Draft – November 14, 2016
Page 5 of 19
Final Draft – November 14, 2016
Page 6 of 19
Final Draft – November 14, 2016
293
294 Table 3. Sample Matrix Linking Assessment Methods with Set Targets and
295 Standards
296
Key Courses Assessment Methods Targets and Standards
P-03 to P-05,P-11 to P-15, 50% of the students get a
P-17 to P-20, P-23 Problem Set, Written rating of at least 60%
Exam
P-07 , P-17 and P-18 Laboratory Experiments, 60% of the students get a
Problem Set, Written rating of at least 60%
Exam
P-03 to P-05, P-06, P-07 , Problem Set, Written 60% of the students get a
P-11, P-12, P-17, P-18, P- Exam rating of at least 60%
20, P-21, P-23
297
298 For the Assessment of Program Educational Objectives, the stakeholders of the
299 program have to be contacted through survey or focus group discussion to
300 obtain feedback data on the extent of the achievement of the PEOs.
301
302 Program Evaluation pertains to one or more processes for interpreting the data
303 and evidence accumulated from the assessment. Evaluation determines the
304 extent at which the Program Outcomes and the Program Educational
305 Objectives are achieved by comparing actual achievement versus set targets
306 and standards. Evaluation results in decisions and actions regarding the
307 continuous improvement of the program.
308
309 Other Methods of Program Assessment and Evaluation may be found in the
310 CHED Implementation Handbook for Outcomes-Based Education (OBE) and
311 Institutional Sustainability Assessment (ISA).
312
313 (see PO/PI/Assessment Matrix)
314
315 Sec. 9 Continuous Quality Improvement
316
317 There must be a documented process for the assessment and evaluation of
318 program educational objectives and program outcomes.
319
320 The comparison of achieved performance indicators with declared targets or
321 standards of performance should serve as basis for the priority projects or
322 programs for improving the weak performance indicators. Such projects and
323 programs shall be documented as well as the results of its implementation. This
324 regular cycle of documentation of projects, programs for remediation and their
325 successful implementation shall serve as the evidence for Continuous Quality
326 Improvement.
327
328 By AY 2018-2019, after a benchmarking project of the Technical Committee for
329 Aeronautical Engineering and other Aviation Related programs, the commission
330 shall release a set of minimum standards for a number of key performance
331 indicators for selected program outcomes, and these shall serve as the
332 common targets or achievement by all HEIs offering BSAeroE programs for
333 their Continuous Quality Improvement program.
334
335
336
Page 7 of 19
Final Draft – November 14, 2016
337
338 ARTICLE V
339 CURRICULUM
340
341 Sec. 10 Curriculum Description
342
343 The Aeronautical Engineering curriculum is designed to meet the BSAeroE
344 Program Outcomes stated in Article IV, Section 6.2. This is articulated in a
345 Curriculum Map discussed in Section 12. The curriculum must develop
346 engineers who have a background in mathematics, natural, physical and allied
347 sciences. As such the curriculum contains courses in mathematics, physics,
348 chemistry, materials and environmental sciences. The Aeronautical Engineering
349 curriculum also contains mandated general education and elective courses as
350 connected to the desired program outcomes. This is to ensure that the
351 Aeronautical Engineering graduate can understand and articulate the nature of
352 his/her special role in the society and the impact of their work in the
353 environment. The curriculum is designed to guarantee a certain breadth of
354 knowledge of the Aeronautical Engineering disciplines through a set of core
355 courses and to ensure depth and focus in certain disciplines through
356 specialized elective courses. A minimum of 420 hours of immersion in
357 Aeronautical Engineering activities outside the institution and a capstone
358 project in Aeronautical Engineering design are the final requirements of the
359 curriculum.
360
361 Sec. 11 Sample Curriculum
362
363 Below is the sample curriculum of the BSAeroE program. The institution may
364 enrich the sample/model program of study depending on the needs of the
365 industry, provided that all prescribed courses required in the curriculum outline
366 are offered and pre-requisite and co-requisite are observed.
367
368
Minimum No. of Hours
Minimum Credit
Classification/ Field / Course
Lecture Laboratory Units
I. TECHNICAL COURSES
A. Mathematics
Integral Calculus 3 0 3
Differential Equation 3 0 3
Advanced Engineering Mathematics for
3 0 3
Aeronautical Engineers
Mathematics for Engineers and Scientists 3 0 3
Sub-Total 18 0 18
Page 8 of 19
Final Draft – November 14, 2016
B. Natural/Physical Sciences
General Chemistry 3 3 4
Physics 1 3 3 4
Physics 2 3 3 4
Sub-Total: 9 9 12
Engineering Drawing 0 3 1
Engineering Economics 3 0 3
Engineering Management 3 0 3
Ethics 3 0 3
Sub-Total: 30 18 36
D. Allied Courses
Thermodynamics 3 0 3
Basic Electronics 3 0 3
Sub – Total 9 0 9
Page 9 of 19
Final Draft – November 14, 2016
E. Professional Courses
Fundamentals of Aerodynamics 4 0 4
Reciprocating Engines 3 3 4
Aircraft Systems 3 3 4
Aircraft Structure 1 4 0 4
Aircraft Structures 2 4 0 4
Aircraft Design 1 3 6 5
Aircraft Design 2 3 6 5
Aeronautical Laboratory 1 1 3 2
Aeronautical Laboratory 2 1 3 2
Reliability Engineering 3 0 3
Aircraft Production, Maintenance, Planning
and Control 2 3 3
Sub-Total: 60 45 75
F. Electives
Technical Elective 3 0 3
Aircraft Accident Investigation
Lighter Than Air aircraft
Project Feasibility Study
(Aviation/Airline Issues)
Sub-Total: 3 0 3
Page 10 of 19
Final Draft – November 14, 2016
A. Social Sciences
Understanding the Self 3 0 3
Sociology with Family Planning and LRT 3 0 3
Science, Technology, Engineering and
3 0 3
Society
Contemporary World 3 0 3
Reading in Philippine History 3 0 3
Sub-Total: 15 0 15
B. Humanities
Sub-Total: 3 0 3
C. Languages
Purposive Communication 3 0 3
3 0 3
Sub-Total:
D. Mandated Course
P.E. 1,2,3,4 8 0 8
Sub-Total: 8 0 8
Minimum No. of Hours Minimum Credit
Classification/ Field / Course
Lecture Laboratory Units
Page 11 of 19
Final Draft – November 14, 2016
I. TECHNICAL COURSES
A. Mathematics 18 0 18
B. Natural/Physical Sciences 9 9 12
C. Basic Engineering Sciences 30 18 36
D. Allied Courses 9 0 9
E. Professional Courses 60 45 75
Sub- Total 132 72 156
II. NON- TECHNICAL
A. Social Sciences 15 0 15
B. Humanities 3 0 3
C. Languages 3 0 3
D. Life and Works of Rizal 3 0 3
E. Physical Education 8 0 8
F. NSTP - - (6)
Sub- Total 32 0 32
GRAND TOTAL 164 72 188
378
379
380
381 Sec. 12 Sample Curriculum Map
382
383 As per CMO 37 s. 2012, curriculum map is “a matrix relating all the courses
384 listed in the program curriculum with one or more of the declared
385 student/program outcomes.” See Annex B for a sample curriculum map.
386
387 The HEI/SUC/LCU should create a complete curriculum map for their current or
388 existing BSAeroE curriculum
389
390 Sec. 13 Description of Outcomes Based Teaching and Learning
391
392 Outcomes-Based Teaching and Learning (OBTL) is an approach where
393 teaching and learning activities are developed to support the learning outcomes
394 (University of Hong Kong, 2007). It is a student-centered approach for the
395 delivery of educational programs where the curriculum topics in a program and
396 the courses contained in it are expressed as the intended outcomes for
397 students to learn. It is an approach in which teachers facilitate and students find
398 themselves actively engaged in their learning.
399
400 Its primary focus is the clear statement of what students should be able to do
401 after taking a course, known as the Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs). The
402 ILOs describe what the learners will be able to do when they have completed
403 their course or program. These are statements, written from the students'
Page 12 of 19
Final Draft – November 14, 2016
404 perspective, indicating the level of understanding and performance they are
405 expected to achieve as a result of engaging in teaching and learning
406 experience (Biggs and Tang, 2007). Once the ILOs have been determined, the
407 next step in OBTL is to design the Teaching / Learning Activities (TLAs) which
408 require students to actively participate in the construction of their new
409 knowledge and abilities. A TLA is any activity which stimulates, encourages or
410 facilitates learning of one or more intended learning outcome. The final OBTL
411 component is the Assessment Tasks (ATs), which measure how well students
412 can use their new abilities to solve real-world problems, design, demonstrate
413 creativity, and communicate effectively, among others. An AT can be any
414 method of assessing how well a set of ILO has been achieved.
415
416 A key component of a course design using OBTL is the constructive alignment
417 of ILOs, TLAs, and ATs. This design methodology requires the Intended
418 Learning Outcomes to be developed first, and then the Teaching / Learning
419 Activities and Assessment Tasks are developed based on the ILOs.¬ (Biggs,
420 1999).
421
422 “Constructive” refers to the idea that students construct meaning through
423 relevant learning activities; “alignment” refers to the situation when teaching
424 and learning activities, and assessment tasks, are aligned to the Intended
425 Learning Outcomes by using the verbs stipulated in the ILOs. Constructive
426 alignment provides the “how-to” by stating that the TLAs and the assessment
427 tasks activate the same verbs as in the ILOs. (Biggs and Tang, 1999)
428
429 The OBTL approach shall be reflected in the Course Syllabus to be
430 implemented by the faculty.
431
432
433 Sec. 14 Components of OBE-Compliant Course Syllabus
434
435 To make the course syllabus OBE-compliant, the following components should
436 be included:
437
438 14.1. General Course Information (Title, Description, Code, Credit Units,
439 Prerequisites)
440 14.2 Links to Program Outcomes
441 14.3 Course Outcomes
442 14.4 Course Outline (Including Unit Outcomes)
443 14.5 Teaching and Learning Activities
444 14.6 Assessment Methods
445 14.7 Final Grade Evaluation
446 14.8 Learning Resources
447 14.9 Course Policies and Standards
448 14.10 Effectivity and Revision Information
449
450 Course outcome refers to what learners are expected to know and be able to
451 do at end of the course.
452
453 Teaching and learning activity refers to an activity or set of activities that will
454 engage the student in achieving the course outcome.
455
456 Assessment task refers to a tool that determines how well the student has
457 met the course outcome.
458
Page 13 of 19
Final Draft – November 14, 2016
459 See Annex III for sample syllabi for selected courses as volunteered by some
460 institutions already implementing OBE as well as some institutions that will
461 implement OBE.
462
463 ARTICLE VI
464 REQUIRED RESOURCES
465
466 Sec. 15 Administration
467
468 The administration of the college of engineering must provide academic
469 governance and leadership to engineering programs by exerting efforts to
470 achieve program educational objectives and program outcomes. As such, the
471 college must have a full-time dean and full-time department or program chair
472 who are adept in the principles of outcomes-based education and are trained to
473 implement the elements of OBE and OBTL required by CMO 37 s2012.
474
475 The dean of the college of engineering who will lead in the development,
476 monitoring, assessment, evaluation and continuous improvement of
477 engineering programs must have the following qualifications:
478
479 1. Holder of BS Aeronautical Engineering degree;
480 2. Registered Aeronautical Engineer with valid PRC ID;
481 3. Holder of Master’s in Science or in Engineering and preferably Doctoral
482 degrees in Aeronautical Engineering, Management Engineering,
483 Aeronautical Engineering Education, Natural Science, or Mathematics;
484 4. With at least three (3) years of experience in teaching engineering courses;
485 and
486 5. With at least three years of experience in academic administration.
487
488 The department or program chair who will lead in the curriculum planning,
489 implementation, monitoring, assessment, evaluation and continuous
490 improvement of the B.S. Aeronautical Engineering program must have the
491 following qualifications:
492
493 1. Holder of a B.S. in Aeronautical Engineering degree;
494 2. Registered Aeronautical Engineer with valid PRC license;
495 3. Holder of Master’s of Science or of Engineering and preferably Doctoral
496 degree in Aeronautical Engineering, Management Engineering,
497 Aeronautical Engineering Education, Natural Science, or Mathematics;
498 4. With at least three (3) years of college-level teaching experience relevant to
499 BS Aeronautical Engineering program.
500
501 The college dean may serve as concurrent department or program chair in
502 extreme cases of low enrolment.
503
504
505 The Department/Program Chair must be given an administrative load of at least
506 50% of regular teaching load.
507
508 All administrators shall provide leadership in the following:
509
510 a) curriculum development and coordination of curricular offerings, textbook
511 adoption, evaluation procedures, methodologies of instruction,
512 departmental activities and professional development for school personnel;
Page 14 of 19
Final Draft – November 14, 2016
Page 15 of 19
Final Draft – November 14, 2016
Page 16 of 19
Final Draft – November 14, 2016
Page 17 of 19
Final Draft – November 14, 2016
Page 18 of 19
Final Draft – November 14, 2016
Page 19 of 19