Before discussing the Aristotle’s concept we should first go
back to Plato’s concept because certainly Plato’s thinking and observations had an impression and deep impact on Aristotle’s concept. According to Plato soul is transcendental, it is not composed by the body it is actually the essence of life. So it makes decisions on its own and display s the emotions which are displayed as voluntary actions. Above all there is a purpose behind the activities of soul so all the engagements-interactions human body have with the outer world is not a historical and repetitive process its more kind of dynamic . Now lets elaborate what were Aristotle’s views – Aristotle’s proposes a transcendental theory of life, affirming that soul is the principle of life the essence of life. Here is where the important aspect of philosophy comes into action that is metaphysics , according to Aristotle’s Metaphysics is the ultimate source of knowledge so he presupposes the notion of soul as a metaphysics concept to explain the nature of reality. From this mighty branch of philosophy comes two concepts that are- Potentiality and Actuality. UTKARSH SINGH 19095101 ELECTRONICS For example lets take our human body and name it potentially ‘x’ So we identify body as ‘x’ this is actualisation. From this discussion it is demonstrated that soul is actualisation and body is potentialisation. According to Plato matter and forms are two separate entities and forms are logically prior in this universe than the existence of particulars, while Aristotle’s believed both to be same. It is actually by the process of actualisation that matter gets an identity. While Plato considered form to be copies of particulars , Aristotle’s belief was absolute opposite that form actually carries particulars and give them identity.
Plato, in his theory of forms, separates the sensible world
(appearances) of the intelligible world (ideas) and therefore the intelligible world was the sole reality, the inspiration of all truth. But in Aristotle’s Metaphysics, at the guts of his philosophy, such separation removes any intelligibility and intending to the globe. in step with him, the intelligibility is present in every being and in every thing. the globe consists of drugs. The substance is either matter or form, or a compound of both. the form is that, in every being, is general, so intelligible. for instance the form of a dog is what's common to any or all dogs. The matter UTKARSH SINGH 19095101 ELECTRONICS is what's special, so unknowable. or Aristotle the biologist, the soul is not—as it absolutely was in a number of Plato’s writings—an exile from a higher world ill-housed in an exceedingly base body. The soul’s very essence is defined by its relationship to an body. Not only humans but beasts and plants too have souls, intrinsic principles of animal and vegetable life. A soul, Aristotle says, is “the actuality of a body that has life,” where life means the capacity for self-sustenance, growth, and reproduction. If one regards a protoplasm as a composite of matter and form, then the soul is that the variety of a natural —or, as Aristotle sometimes says, organic—body. An organic body may be a body that has organs—that is to mention, parts that have specific functions, like the mouths of mammals and also the roots of trees. Now we talk about the debate in our surroundings .There are natural substances around us then there are artificial things around us which have been created by human beings like computers and furniture etc. All the living beings like human , plants all grow and decay that’s what sums up their lifetime , according to Aristotle every natural body which shares life is substance and soul is the essence of this life .The relationship between the substance and body does not has mechanicality in it but is natural. UTKARSH SINGH 19095101 ELECTRONICS According to interpretations of Miller he rather has an interesting take on this topic, by saying the matter is not a attribute of a subject (body).Hence soul is not an attribute of the body rather soul is the substance which potentially partakes of life. This statement if read from a layman’s perspective seems a bunch of plain and flat words but if you put into the real meanings of “potentiality”,”body” and “soul” which were given or discussed by Aristotle the meaning of this piece by Miller strikes clearly.
In the first level of actualisation knowledge is the actual state
and being aware corresponds to the exercise of such knowledge.So this takes us to four different levels of souls- 1)Intellect 2)Perception 3)Locomotion and rest 4)Nutritive movement ,growth and decay Human beings live a very complex life with a very complex knowledge system compared to the normative and basic life animals live. As seen from the above discussions Aristotle had a different meaning or what u can say different interpretation of what soul meant to him. According to him soul is in the body with a purpose, these views somewhat differ to that of Plato’s . Summarising about the nature of soul it is said that soul is basically material UTKARSH SINGH 19095101 ELECTRONICS ,matter is to form is what body is to soul , soul is imperishable and immortal. Now he talks what are the four different causes- 1)Material 2)Efficient 3)Formal 4)Final The material cause is part of the matter, he material cause is what something is made out of. The formal cause is what makes a thing one thing rather than many things. The efficient cause is what did that. The final cause is why efficient causes do what they do and why formal causes do what they do. The universe is changing rapidly and there is only one constant which is change , change is the only constant . And for Aristotle god is the unmoved mover , the principle behind every movement . Principle of power is present which is special because it is having intellect . At last according to Aristotle soul is the most material component of the body , it is a part of the body but still it has its own logical functions which are different from the body’s actions. UTKARSH SINGH 19095101 ELECTRONICS