eT Seen ee eh eS at aL) cs eee (¢ For non-representational theories, then, the question of how to think with/in the world—this time, on this occasion, under these circumstances—is never settled in advance, but must be worked out, per-formed, as it were, through a process (89). (( Method, in this context, is about turning things around: {{ Things that in all defamiliarizing them; placing them in generative Ee) Ce MECN juxtapositionings that allow thinking to grasp a sense of gentle or violent, liveliness of the worlds of things anew, however modestly oblige us to (92). Full again. anew (109). (¢ Rather it is an ontological or ontogenetic difficulty: our difficulty is how to be empirical in different ways such that we make more of the worlds in which we move available for thinking—how we draw difference out, how we make it palpable (94). aa aCe Mca meee culms Pan elcres uuce Wine aR UT SSS as extracting something from the world to consist of and be composed of than of making the variations of the Cala Ue ME ULL Plt coer CU CLL DU Mo CL Pera Me caie came) CCC m ua ue acum Seen] AUC R aR UR ete Plu Me LL tensities of feeling (97). Teo er ue MULT) EOE ecm el aurea eagle) CE a ee ee of every time an example of it is bale oo) eh Ce URC oc US) attentiveness, something might take Md Ge em unremarkable of circumstances CCU MUL (cbs (trae Tee etal A Oe) R OU to work in a way that makes a difference to worlds but also, importantly, in a way that reshapes the concept, edging it with other kinds of potential. And we could also say the same about techniques (100). Me AERP Grae)