Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.2.2. Predictability
Predictable: for example, alcohol related.
Unpredictable or idiosyncratic: immunological based or due to a metabolic
abnormality.
1.2.3. Organelle damage
A less commonly used method of classifying hepatotoxicants is according to the
organelle (one small part of a cell that has a very specific function or job) primarily
affected.
1.3. Detection and evaluation of liver injury
Liver damage can be detected with a range of procedures, from external palpation to
enlargement and tenderness, blood enzyme tests, through to needle biopsy.
Acute hepatotoxicity can be detected with commonly used noninvasive tests.
Detection of subacute and chronic hepatic damage is more difficult.
Methods for testing for liver damage in response to chemical exposure:
Physical examination
Clinical chemistry
Enzymes
Bilirubin
Bile salts
Proteins
Histopathology
Light microscopy
Electron microscopy
Organ function tests
Dye excretion
Drug biotransformation
In testing for liver damage, the activity of a range of enzymes may be measured (see text).
Elevated levels of one or more of these enzymes may indicate liver damage.
Other markers include bile acids and bilirubin.
However, the histological appearance of the liver remains the most definitive indicator of
liver injury.
Biopsy in humans for confirmation of diagnosis is usually employed when there is
uncertainty.
1.4. Examples of hepatotoxicity from workplace exposures
Many chemicals have the potential to cause liver injury in workers due to
biotransformation activities.
In the past, chemicals such as carbon tetrachloride have been associated with both acute
and chronic liver injury in exposed workers.
With increased knowledge and improved workplace conditions such examples are now
less frequent.
Nevertheless, they do continue to occur as evidenced by case reports of workers
experiencing liver damage after using various chemicals such as dimethyl formamide and
methylene dianiline.
Since the kidney is able to compensate extremely well for loss of renal functional mass,
changes in renal function may not be identified until there is significant (more than 70%)
nephron (smallest kidney unit) damage or loss.
Decreased GRF (glomerular filtration rate) can cause azotemia (high N) characterized by
elevation of the blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine.
Changes in electrolytes and acid-base balance may also be present in the blood of patients
with renal disease.
Urine volume can be determined and urine can be examined (urinalysis) for the presence
of cells, proteins, casts, and crystals which are not normally present.
Indicators of renal damage include:
Albuminuria or proteinuria (albumin, protein in urine)
Aminoaciduria (amino acids in urine)
Globulinuria (globulins in urine), either myoglobin or hemoglobin
Glycosuria (glucose in urine)
Hematuria (blood in urine)
Inflammatory cells in urine
Tubular cells in urine
Presence of these components in the urine may indicate injury to the glomerulus resulting
in increased permeability and/or lack of reabsorption in the tubules.
Proteinuria is often an early and sensitive indicator of renal injury.
High molecular weight proteins in the urine indicate glomerular dysfunction,
Low molecular weight proteins indicate tubular dysfunction.
Because of the marked improvement of workplace hygiene in recent years, most patients
with chemically induced renal injury due to workplace exposure present mild
abnormalities, such as proteinuria.
A history of occupational exposure, identification of exposure to known or suspected
nephrotoxicants and the confirmation of exposure through detection of the toxicant, its
adduct, or other specific effect in blood, urine or tissues, are most important for diagnosis.
It is important to exclude other possible causes of kidney injury, including
nonoccupational exposure to chemicals and drugs, infection or metabolic abnormalities.
Methods for detecting and evaluating chemical-induced renal injury include:
Clinical examination
Urinalysis and microscopy
Estimation of glomerular filtration rate
2.3. Examples of damage to the kidney from workplace exposure
Many chemicals have been reported to cause renal toxicity following workplace (or
environmental or therapeutic) exposure.
These include glycols, halogenated solvents, metals, biological toxins, organic solvents
and hydrocarbons, and pesticides.
2.4. Rehabilitation of the individual with kidney damage
The problems of rehabilitation of the individual differ according to whether the individual
suffers from acute or chronic disease.
If a ‘critical mass’ of the kidney is not affected, then repair through cell proliferation and
compensatory mechanisms are initiated and renal function can return to normal.
However, if injury is severe or exposure continues then a return to normal is not possible.
The first consideration in worker rehabilitation is to ensure that a worker is not returned to
the same work environment that precipitated the injury.
This requires an assessment of the workplace for nephrotoxicants, and elimination or
control of any contaminant found.
Further, it involves identification of other risk factors, not necessarily of an occupational
nature, that may interact with occupational nephrotoxic factors.