Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Zoom Teaching
Zoom Teaching
Last spring, when shelter-in-place orders went into effect, my daughter’s preschool teacher heroically
tried to adapt her classroom to the virtual world. At first, she had an assistant, whose primary job was to
mute and unmute kids in Zoom to imitate the experience of calling on students in class. The task is harder
than it seems: You have to scan a Brady Bunch-style grid of two dozen wiggling children for raised
hands, click “unmute” under one of their names, and cross your fingers that they are not muted on their
end (half the time, they are).
After a few months, the assistant was furloughed, leaving my daughter’s teacher to manage the mute
function on her own—while also trying to present lessons, keep track of time, and babysit a group of
increasingly stir-crazy 3- to 5-year-olds. She was juggling too many competing demands. She might as
well have been asked to play Rachmaninoff while riding a unicycle.
Countless teachers are facing similar problems this fall, as districts across the country usher in the school
year remotely to help curb the spread of COVID-19. Conventional wisdom has it that remote learning is
an inferior substitute for in-person classes, useful only in an emergency that threatens the health and
safety of teachers, students, and staff. And it’s true that the circumstances around distance learning pose
tremendous challenges, exacerbating inequity and placing impossible demands on working parents. But
class via computers itself is not inherently flawed. It’s the remote platforms that are failing teachers and
students.
Zoom, in particular, has struggled to adjust to its newfound prominence in the educational firmament.
More than 100,000 U.S. school districts and roughly half the country’s higher-education institutions use
the videoconferencing platform in large part because it’s easy, at least in theory: Just click a link, and start
teaching. In practice, the experience is more complicated. Last month, Zoom went down for hours due to
an unspecified problem, disrupting the first day of school for many children and college students. And
last spring, the platform experienced several high-profile hacking incidents, which caused New York City
schools and other districts to temporarily ban Zoom.
The company quickly rolled out a series of security upgrades. But it has been slower to address workaday
complaints about its UX. Classes were already underway at school districts across the country on August
20 when Zoom finally released improvements critical to educators, such as a way of including ASL
interpreters and more control over muting. Many other important features remain unavailable. So we
asked teachers—ranging from elementary school teachers to college professors—how they would
redesign Zoom to work better for themselves and their students.
In August, Zoom updated its platform to let teachers selectively unmute students. But the feature is buried
in Zoom’s web portal settings. And once teachers activate it, students or their parents have to opt in
through a pop-up message. This is to address potential privacy concerns (fortunately, they only have to
opt in once). Of course, if they don’t, the teacher is right back where she started, wasting precious class
time reminding students to unmute themselves.
Alternatively, LaBarre suggests that Zoom could create a strong visual cue that helps even the youngest
learners navigate the mute function. For now, LaBarre says she’s planning to make one herself. “When I
start Zooming with my new class, I’ll show a picture of what the microphone looks like when it’s on, and
then I’ll have another picture of what the microphone looks like when it’s muted,” she says. “That way, I
won’t have to say ‘turn your mic on.'”
“I might pose a big question about the perspective of character in a story and have students draw a
connection to their own life in a pair share,” says John Cherichello, a 7th-grade English Language Arts
teacher at MS 88 in Brooklyn, referring to an in-person teaching technique in which students partner up to
discuss a topic one-on-one. On Zoom, he has to drop into each breakout room to pose the same question
over and over again, which is a huge timesuck. A better design would give Cherichello an overview of all
the breakout rooms and allow him to chime in, like an omniscient narrator, at opportune moments. “An
easy breakout room function would really help make the virtual classroom feel a little bit more like the
real thing,” he says.
Indeed, the chatbox, which appears to the side of Zoom’s main view, is frills-free to the point of wringing
any nuance from conversations. You can’t have side conversations (using threads, for instance), without
inundating the main chat. There are no emoji readily available. To find an emoji, you have to click “edit”
in the nav bar, then “emojis & symbols,” and an emoji menu appears—a cumbersome process that defeats
the purpose of using emoji as shorthand for written words.
Ward’s suggestion? Establish a stronger information hierarchy. “I would design it for moderators so they
can see a blown-out version of the chat,” he says. “Then I would create tools for distinguishing between
comments, questions, and DMs, and make it more obvious when people are raising hands or clapping.
Some of my meetups have close to 500 people. The chats become a constant stream. It’s overwhelming.”
A richer way of presenting lessons
Jamie Ewing, a science teacher for grades K through 5th at PS 277 in the Bronx, laments how Zoom
“flattens” his teaching style. “When I’m in front of the classroom, I get to interact with the content,” he
says. “In a Zoom meeting, you don’t have that option. Either you’re the focus or the content is the focus.
When you switch over to screen share, you disappear, and you lose the ability to make eye contact [with
students].”
Elise McHugh, a biology and chemistry teacher at Groton-Dunstable Regional High School in Groton,
Massachusetts, echoes the sentiment. “I found myself holding up my paper copy of the periodic table, and
then another paper copy of another reference sheet, and then moving the computer to face my physical
white board when solving a chemistry problem” last spring, she says. “It would be easier if I could toggle
between these documents quickly through Zoom, and even be able to have a cursor on them.”
Ewing has instead started testing a third-party app called Prezi, which enables him to overlay graphics
onto Zoom lectures to liven up his lessons. In one example, images of a baseball game pop up behind him
to illustrate a lesson on math angles. “Adding an extra layer makes it more inviting and more emotionally
engaging,” he says.
Would he rather be able to create media-rich presentations directly in Zoom? Sure, he says, but “at this
point, I’ll take what I can get.”
Zoom, for its part, says it has no plans to release such a product. “We’re focusing on our training,” says
Zoom’s Global Education Lead Anne Keehn. The company recently held a virtual training summit for
40,000 educators from 150 countries and plans to continue its focus on educating teachers about the
features Zoom has, not on developing new software from scratch. “We don’t see a need for a separate
product,” she says.
Indeed, Zoom’s latest round of updates is geared toward teachers: Teachers can now create virtual seating
charts and spotlight a group of students to approximate an in-person class presentation. There’s also a
“professional music mode,” an audio feature explicitly designed to help music teachers improve the
quality of their lessons. Keehn suggests more education-specific tweaks are on the way.
But these are largely iterative changes, and Zoom could be ceding its sizable competitive advantage if it
doesn’t fully embrace its starring role in U.S. education—especially since aspects of distance learning
will likely stick around long after COVID-19 abates.
“What it really comes down to is: Does Zoom want to continue as a meeting service that’s doing
emergency remote learning?” says Shanna Katz Kattari, an assistant professor of sociology and women’s
studies at the University of Michigan. “[Distance learning] is going to continue for at least another year, if
not longer. People are going to recognize that online learning is completely valid and effective. It would
be a really wise investment to make a secondary product for classrooms.”