Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHAPTER 1
Thallophyta 1
This chapter includes all benthonic algae (planktonic algae are in Chapter 2), the family
Prototaxitaceae, bacteria and fungi. In some of these groups the fossil record is very inadequate,
and the method of documentation has been varied accordingly.
Algae are the only fossil group which have a widespread development in the Precamb. The
earliest fossil records, dating from at least 2700 m.y., are stromatolites possibly belonging to the
Chlorophyceae and Cyanophyceae. Definite cellular microorganisms, including Gunflintia,
Animikiea and Archaeorestis identified as blue-green algae, have been found in the Gunffint Chert,
M. Precamb, Canada, and are 1900 m.y. old (Barghoorn and Tyler 1965; Cloud 1965). Even
at the earliest period there seems to have been considerable diversity in the group and since then
continuous evolutionary progress has taken place. Divergence, convergence and parallelism of
form and habit in the different classes of algae during their geological history is striking (Fritsch
1948). Thus the structural pattern of the Chlorophyceae, Cyanophyceae and in most part the
Rhodophyceae is remarkably parallel from unicellular motile and colonial, through filamentous
to complex thaUoid forms.
The great majority of living algae do not produce skeletons but of the known fossil algae almost
every genus is calcareous and many are important rock builders. Maslov (1961) has shown that
carbonates can be deposited by algae in six different ways. Of these the "mixed" or "stromato-
litic" process and the "biochemical" process are most important in the Precamb. The "organic"
and "physiological" processes emerged in the Camb but the "stromatolitic" process was probably
dominant as late as the Silurian. Since then the "organic" process has been gaining importance
and the "stromatolitic" process is restricted to limited occurrences at the present time. To what
extent the evolution of the various classes of fossil algae is connected with these changes in car-
bonate deposition is obscure.
Genetic classification of the fossil algae is largely subjective owing to the great antiquity of the
group and the origin of even the more recent families is shrouded in uncertainty. Lack of colour
pigments and reproductive structures further adds to the difficulties of classification in the fossil
algae. The classification used here is adapted from Papenfuss (1955) and Pia (1927). We are
much indebted to Dr J. H. Price (British Museum of National History, London) who kindly
supplied the authorities of the living families of calcareous algae. [H.M.J. & G.A.L.J.]
The Fossil Record, pp. 163-180. Geological Society of London, 1967. Printed in Northern Ireland.
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on December 2, 2020
SEE FIG B
Carn
u Lad i'n
~ An|s ~-u
Olenek '~,.~
o o
Induan
.~. e c. 4)
Z
_<
Dzhulf
Guad
Leonard
~ -{1 f = _ _ . a
o
Sakm
Assel
U .Carb
• Moscov
0~c
Bashk
Z
0 Namur
~,~ Vision
T. . . . ~
.~
Famenn =~
Frasn
U
o
~1~ ~.~
E
7 Givet I
< 1 *
~ Elfel I
> I t
Fins I
1 9
Siegen I
Gedinn I T
Z Ludl J
,,,(
Lldov I b 9
4-
Ashg I
Z Carad I
Lldeil !
:>
i 9
O: I:.lvffn u
0 b~enig J
8-
T,,m~ I I i
Z U.Camb I I
4 -e--
M Camb I I
.,~ -t i
U L .Camb !
• Varang
,U,, Pre-Var
164
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on December 2, 2020
M.es, r 1 o
Campan j n-
So.to. I ~I
Coniac j
| o a I
Turon J ! e
o
e e
o u
e
o
O
u u-~. u
o u o o
9- o ~ u
0- AIb / o-~ xo
U E
o ~o
Apt
B..... I /
Haut J
Valang J
Bert I
frith' J
Kimm j
~ I F ~
Oxf I
~ ] k ~
Call
u
Both
~Baioc
Toarc
PI lens
Sinem
Hett
u
~, Rhaet
~. Nor
SEE FIGA
Chlorophyceae J Rhodophyceae Schizophyceae T Xanthophyta
TAXA
THALLOPHYTA 1 Calcareous Algae
12 165
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on December 2, 2020
Chapter 1: Thallophyta--I
Family CODIACEAE(Trevisan) Zanardini 1843
First, Camb-Ord: Palaeoporella variabilis Stolley 1893, Late Camb. or basal Ord, Sweden,
Norway and Texas. Extant.
Comument: Pre-Camb Oldhamia and Palaeorivularia may be primitive codiaceans or the latter
may be a red alga (C. L. Fenton 1943, Endo 1961). Abundant in present oceans mostly non-
lime-depositing.
Family VALONIACEAEN~igeli 1847
First, Jur Oxf-'Tith': Pycnoporidium lobatum Yabe and Toyama 1928, Torinosu Lst, Abukama
Mountainlands, Japan and Spain. P. melobesioides (Pfender), France. Extant.
Co~axnent: P. toyamai, Perm, has doubtful generic assignment. P. lobatum and P. melobesioides
extend to L. Cret. P. sinuosum J. H. Johnson and Konishi L. Cret, Guatemala. No known Tert
forms, living forms mostly tropical.
Chapter 1: Thallophytaml
Family SPONGIOSTROMATAPia 1927
First, Pre-Camb: Corycium enigmaticum Sederholm 1911, Archean (2200-3000 m.y.), Ajonokka
E. Shore, Lake Nasijarvi, Finland; Stromatolites, Archean (more than 2700 m.y.), Dolomite
Series, Bulawayo, S. Rhodesia; Collenia sp. and Conophyton sp., Pharusian (more than 2000 m.y.),
Sahara, N. Africa. Extant.
[H.M.J. & G.A.L.J.]
Class UNCERTAIN
First, Sil Wenl: Prototaxites hicksii (Etheridge) Pia, at base of Denbighshire Grits, Cyrtograptus
murchisoni Z., Corwen, North Wales, Britain (Hicks 1881, Kr~iusel & Weyland 1934).
Last, Dev Frasn: Protoaxites southworthii Arnold, Kettle Point black sh, Lambton County,
Ontario, Canada (Arnold 1952).
C o m m e n t : The family Protaxitaceae, as used here, includes Nernatothallus Lang, 1937 which
occurs in the Dev Siegen-Gedin, Wales. It is possible that the family will be split ultimately into
two or more groups when sufficient data are available. [H.P.B.]
First, Carb Bashk: Pila and Reinschia Bertrand and Renault, Boghead Cannel Coal (Torbane-
hill Mineral), base of Coal Measures, West Lothian, Scotland (Blackburn & Temperley 1936).
Extant.
Comanent: These algae are taken to resemble closely Botryococcus braunii Ktitzing (extant) and
other similar records come from most later periods (Traverse 1955). These algae probably
occurred also in the early Carb, but Gleocapsamorpha from the Kuchersite, Ord, Estonia, has been
omitted. [N.F.H.]
REFERENCES
ARNOLD,C . A . 1952. A specimen of Prototaxites from the Kettle Point black shale of Ontario.
Palaeontographica, 93B, 45-56.
BRADLEY, W . H . 1962. A chloroplast in Spirogyra from the Green River Formation of Wyoming.
Amer. 3". Sci., 260, 455-459.
BARGHOORN,E. S. & TYLER, S.A. 1965. Micro-organisms from the Gunflint Chert. Science, N.Y.,
147, 563-577.
BLACKBURN, K. B. & TEMPERLEY, B. N. 1936. Botrycoccus and the algal coals. Trans. R. Soc.
Edinb., 58, 841-868, 2 pls.
BIGOT, A. 1929. Les Rdcifs en coupole du Cambrien de Carteret et les Rfcifs de Chlorellopsis.
C.r. hebd. Sdanc. Acad. Sci., Paris 189, 816-7.
BOHLIN, K. 1901. Utleart till de gr6na algemas och arkegoniatemas fylogeni. Thesis, Lund (publ. by
author).
CLOUD, P . E . 1965. Significance of the Gunflint (Precambrian) microflora. Science, N.Y., 148,
27-35.
COLOM, G. 1955. Jurassic-Cretaceous plelagic sediments of the western Mediterranean and the
Atlantic area. Micropaleontology, 1, 105-124.
ELLIOTT, G. F. 1955. The Permian calcareous algae Gyrnnocodiurn. Micropaleontology, 1, 83-90.
1958. Algal debris-facies in the Cretaceous of the Middle East. Palaeontology, 1, 254-259.
169
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on December 2, 2020
ENDO, R. 1961. Phylogenetic relationships among the calcareous algae. Sait. Univ. Sci. Rep.
Set. B., Comm. Vol. Prof. R. Endo, 1-52.
FENTON, C. L. 1943. Precambrian and early Palaeozoic algae. Amer. Midl. Nat., 30, 83-111.
FJERDUGST.~a~TL,E. 1954. The sub-fossil algal flora of Lake Bolling. K. danske vidensk, selsk. (biol.),
7, 56.
FRITSCH, F.E. 1948. The structure and reproduction of the Algae. 2 vols., Cambridge University Press.
HicKs, H. 1881. On the discovery of some remains of plants at the base of the Denbighshire
Grits near Corwen, North Wales. Q.. Jl geol. Soc. Lond., 37, 482-496.
JOHNSON,J. H. 1959. A review of the Silurian (Gotlandian) Algae. Colorado Sch. Mines Quart.,
54, 1-55.
JOHNSON, J. H. 1962. The algal genus Lithothamnium and its fossil representatives. Colorado Sch.
Mines Quart., 57, 1-111.
KORDE, K.B. 1950. Algal remains in the Cambrian of the Kazaskhstan. Dokl. Akad. nauk SSSR,
Earth Sci. Ser., 73, 809-812. [in Russian]
KORmA, K. & MIKI, S. 1959. On Paleodictyon and fossil Hydrodictyon. Yabe Jubilee Pub., 1, 55.
KRXUSEL, R. & W~'ZLa_,qD,H. 1934. Algen im deutschen Devon. Palaeontographica, 79B, 131-142.
KUTZINO, F. T. 1845. Die kieselschaligen lanen oder Diatomeen. Ber. Verhandl. Akad. Wiss.,
Berlin.
LA_nG, W . H . 1937. On the plant remains from the Downtonian of England and Wales. Phil.
Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond., 227B, 245-291.
LYUBTSOV, V. V. 1964. Organic remains in most ancient sedimentary and metamorphic seq-
uences of the Kola Peninsula. Int. Geol. Rev., 6, 1408-1412.
MASLOV, V. P. 1937. On the Palaeozoic rock-building algae of east Siberia. Moscow Univ.
Palaeont. Lab., Problems Palaeont., 2-3, 342-348, 12 pls. [In Russian]
1956. Fossil Calcareous algae in the U.S.S.R.U.S.S.R. Acad. Sci., Proc. Inst. Geol. Sci., 160,
1-301. [in Russian]
1961. Algae and the deposition of carbonates. Izv. Akad. nauk SSSR Geol. Ser., 12, 66-70.
MESSmOMMER, E. 1938. Beitrag zur Kenntnis. der fossilen und subfossilen Desmidaceen.
Hedwigia, Dresden, 78, 107-201.
PAPFNFUSS, G. F. 1955. Classification of the algae in Centenary volume (1853-1953), 115-224.
California Acad. Sci., San Fransisco.
PFLUG, H. D. 1965. Organische Reste aus der Belt-Serie (Algonkium) yon Nordamerika.
Paliiont. Z., 39, 10-25.
PL% J. 1927. Thallophyta in Hirmer, M. (1927) "Handbuch der Palaobotanik." vol. 1, 1-136.
Munich and Berlin.
PRIESTLEY, R. E. & DAVID, T. W . E . 1910. Geological notes of the British Antarctic Expedition
1907-1909. l l t h Cong. Geol. Int.
RAO, L. R. 1952. Recent discoveries of fossil algae in India. Palaeobot., 1, 386-391.
TRAVERSe, A. 1955. Occurrence of the oil-forming alga Botryococcus in lignites and other Tertiary
sediments. Micropalaeontology, 1, 343-350, 1 pl.
YABE, H. 1952. A brief summary of the studies of rock forming calcareous algae in Japan.
Palaeobot., 1, 443-447.
FOSSIL BACTERIA
Unequivocal evidence of the presence of bacteria or their spores in the fossil state presents
difficulties due to (1) their recognition in view of minute dimensions; (2) their identification
dependent upon a morphologic similarity to present-day forms; (3) the delimitation of related
and often associated known forms e.g. bacteria, actinomycetes, fungi; (4) absence of knowledge
of the forms of ancient life with the functions of bacteria; (5) the problem of possible contamina-
tion. In a few instances there is undoubted proof through the detailed recognition by the applica-
tion of electron-microscopy, and by the application of biochemical techniques; the viability of
some fossil bacteria has been demonstrated (Dombrowski). The accepted common forms, of
bacteria, e.g. coccoid, bacilloid, filamental, or spirillar have all been recorded, as have their
distinctive arrangements such as diplococcoid, staphylococcoid, streptococcoid and the several
bacilloid arrangements. The preservation varies from the presence of an actual cell wall, to
170
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on December 2, 2020
Chapter 1: Thallophyta--1
mineral replacement of this wall, or to sheath-like covering of the wall. In many instances the
pathological association with bone, or plant tissue, and the resulting lesions on these materials
have provided strong evidence for the presence and activity of bacteria. By analogy with the
functions of modern forms so the associations recorded have been referred to autotrophic or
chemautotrophic forms, or to groups which include iron bacteria, nitrate and sulphate reducing
bacteria, calcareous bacteria and saprophytic forms e.g. (Pia 1928). The possible remains of
bacteria have been recorded from limestones, cherts, iron and manganese ores, phosphorites,
bauxites, tonsteins, oil shales, coal, vertebrate remains, coprolites, plant tissues and invertebrate
skeletons; these occurrences range in age from Pre-Cambrian to the present. The presence of
living bacteria in various modern and recent sediments, sulphur deposits, iron deposits, tufa and
peats provides an analogy with past occurrences. The most important work on fossil bacteria
was that of Renault (1896-1901) and the majority of important references to fossil bacteria are
contained in Meschinelli (1902), Pia (1928), Zobell (1957), Kusnetzov, Ivanov and Lyalikova
(1963). The recent work of Barghoorn and Tyler (1963, 1965), and Cloud (1965), Barghoorn
and Schopf (1965) refer to Pre-Cambrian investigations. The literature contains frequent
reference to the presence of unnamed forms which may be bacteria; other workers have noted a
resemblance to modern forms and referred to the occurrence in that manner e.g. similar to
Grenothrix, Siderocapsa, Sphaerotilus, or Lyngbia. Few records refer to the occurrence in a taxonomic
manner. An important recent exception is the work of Schopf, Ehlers et al. 1965 in which by the
application of electron microscopy utilising replica techniques, the authors demonstrated the
presence of bacteria in iron pyrites of Carboniferous age. Sheath bacteria referred to Sphaerotilus
catenulatus n. sp. were recognised as allied to modern bacteria, e.g. Sphaerotilus natans Kutzing or
Cladothrix dichotoma Cohn. Spiral thread bacteria referred to GaUionella pyritica n. sp. closely
resembled the modern forms of Gallionella ferruginea Ehrenberg; the authors were confident of
!72
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on December 2, 2020
Chapter 1: Thallophyta--I
generic recognition, but despite a strikingly similar habit believed the specific identification to be
unwarranted.
Other segmented microbes of a highly distinctive character were not finally identified but their
probable affinity with members of the sulphur bacteria represented by forms such as the modern
Beggiatoa was noted. The authors draw attention to the remarkable geological stability of both
environment and organisms which appears to have existed over a period of at least 300 m.y.
The preparation of a list of occurrences is fraught with difficulty and ranges are unknown. The
above record arranged in stratigraphic order is not intended to be exhaustive and the
identification is that of the author recording the occurrence. [L.R.M.]
REFERENCES
BARGHOORN, E. S. & SCHOPF,J. W. 1965. Electron Microscopy of Fossil Bacteria Two Billion
Years Old. Science Report, Sept. 1965, pp. 1365-1367.
& TYLER, S.A. 1963. Fossil organisms from Pre-Cambrian Sediments. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.,
108, 451-452.
- - & TYLER, S.A. 1965. Microorganisms from the Gunflint Chert. Science, N.Y., 147, 563-
577.
BRADLEY, W . H . 1931. Origin and Microfossils of the Oil Shale of the Green River Formation
of Colorado and Utah. Prof. Pap. U.S. geol. Surv., 168, pp. 1-57.
CLOUD,P. E. 1965. Significance of the Gunflint (Precambrian) Microflora. Science, N.Y., 148,
27-35.
DOMBROWSKI,H. 1963. Bacteria from Palaeozoic Deposits. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 108, 453-460.
ELLIS, D. 1914. Fossil microorganisms from the Jurassic and Cretaceous Rocks of Great Britain.
Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 35, 110-133.
GRUNER, J. W. 1922. The origin of sedimentary iron formations: The Biwabik formation of the
Mesaba Range. Econ. Geol., 17, 407-460.
Kuzm~TZOV, S. I., IVANOV, M. V. & LYALmOVA, N. N. 1963. Introduction to Geological Micro-
biology. McGraw-Hill. 252 pp.
M~SCmNELLI, A. 1902. Fungorum fossilum omnium hucusque cognitorum iconographia. Vicetiae.
PIA, J. 1928. Die Vorzeitlichen Spaltpilze und Ihre Lebensspuren. Palaeobiologica, 1, 457-474.
RENAULT, B. 1896a. Recherches sur les Bactdricfies fossiles. Annls. Sci. nat. R. 8, Botan, 2, 275.
1896b. Bassin houiUer etpermien d'Autun et d'I~pinac. Fasc. 4, flore fossile, 2me partie, l~tudes
gRes mindr, de la France, publication of Minist. des Travaux, Paris.
1899. Sur quelques Microorganisms des combustibles fossiles. Bull. Soc. Ind. min~r. St-
Etienne, R. 3, 13, 865, and 14, 5.
1901. Du role de quelques bacteriacdes fossiles au point de vue geologique. 8th Int. geol.
Congr., 19 646.
SCHOPF,J. M., EHLERS, E. G., STILES, D. V. & J. D. BmLE. 1965. Fossil iron bacteria preserved
in pyrite. Proc. Am. Phil. Soc., 109, 288-308.
VOLOGDIN, A. G. 1947. Quoted in Kuznetzov, S. I., Ivanov, M. V. & Lyalikova, N. N., 1963.
WALCOTT, C . D . 1915. Discovery of Algonkian Bacteria. Proc. U.S. natn. Acad. Sci., 1, 256.
ZOBELL, C . E . 1957. Bacteria. Mem. geol. Soc. Am., 67, pp. 693-698.
FUNGI
The fossils of fungi consist of petrifactions of complete mycelia etc. which are rare, of spores
which usually have few characters and are difficult to classify, and of organs of other plants
attacked by fungi which leave recognisable damage. The fragmentary fossil record has been
fitted for convenience into the classification of Recent fungi given by Hawker (1966).
Fossil mycorrhiza have been described from the Carb onwards by Andrews and Lenz (1943),
Halket (1930), and others, but no attempt has been made to deal with them separately here.
Sclerotinites (Stach 1957) and Palynomorphites (Moore 1963) have not been classified.
The higher fungi (Ascomycetes, Basidiomycetes) are not well represented before the Cret.
173
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on December 2, 2020
SEE FIG B
Cam
U Ladin
u~
~n;s
Olenek
Induan ' I
1
_ _o B
Dzhulf ~ o- ~ "~
...... ~g .~E
Z Guad a9 9 "E ~: o.-
< - ~ ~ "~ ~
~ eonard m o. o.
Sakm
Assel
U .C~rb
Moscov
0
~ Bashk
Z .a
o Na.~, g
Tourn
Fomenn
Fram
Z Givet
<_
) Eifel
~, Eros
Siegen
Ged;nn
Z Ludl
<_
.~ Wenl
!
w Lldov
A~
l Oomyce,., J Ascomyr j Bas;d;omycetes
TAXA
THALLOPHYTA 1 Fung;
D i v i s i o n PHYCOMYCETES
Although ?Phycomycetes has been mentioned for the Pre-Camb fossils of the Gunflint Chert,
Huronian, Canada (Tyler and Barghoorn 1954), Barghoorn and Tyler (1965) favour algal (or
uncertain) origin for most of the fossils.
Class C H Y T R I D I O M Y C E T E S
Order CHYTRIDALES
First, Carb Moscov: Urophlyctitesoliverianus Magnus (on Alethopteris leaves), U. stigmariae Weiss
and OochytriumlepidodendroniRenault (on lycopods), Westphalian Coal Measures, Western Europe
(see Hirmer 1 9 2 7 ) . Extant.
174
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on December 2, 2020
Chapter 1: Thallophyta--I
.o o w
< z
u.i AIb o ,,~
~:~>" . . . . ~ <
~t
Barrem
Flout
Valang "
Berr
JTith t
Kimm
Oxf
Ca l I
u
Bath
Baioc
To~'r
Pliens
Sinem
Hett
U
Rhaet
~_ N ~
SEE FIG A
Oomycetes Ascomycetes Basid~omycetes
TAXA
THALLOPHYTA 1 Fungi
175
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on December 2, 2020
Order SAPROLEGNIALES
First, Sil Lldov-Wenl: Palaeachlya perforans Duncan 1876 (in Goniophyllum pyramidale, not
located). Extant.
Cornnaent: Palaeomycesgordoni and five other species, Dev Siegen, Rhynie Chert, Aberdeen-
shire, Scotland (Kidston and Lang 1921).
Order PERONOSPORALES
First, Carb Bashk: Peronosporoides carbonifera Smith 1896, Main seam, Annandale Colliery,
Nr. Kilmarnock, Scotland. Extant.
Class ZYGOMYCETES
Order MUCOR.ALES
First, Carb: Mucorites combrensis (Renault), France (Meschinelli, A. 1898, p. 9). Extant.
Class ASCOMYCETES
Order MONILIALES
Family MONILIACEAE
First, Tert Eoc: CladosporitesfasciculatusBerry 1916a, (on lauraceous wood), M Eoc, Claiborne
Gp, Texas, U.S.A. Extant.
Comment: Ramularites oblongisporus Caspary, Olig, Baltic Amber.
Family DEMATIACEAE
First, Cret Campan-Maestr: Trichosporites conwentzi Felix (on Cedroxylon), Ryedal, Sweden
(Stopes 1913). Extant.
Family TUBERCULARIAGEAE
First, Tert Eoc: Dictyosporites loculatus Felix (in wood of Rhamnaceae) Baku, Caspian
(Meschinelli, A. 1898, p. 79). Extant.
Family STILBACEAE
First, Tert Mioc: Stilbites succini Caspary 1907, Baltic Amber, East Prussia. Extant.
Order MELANCONIALES
First, Tert Eoc: Pestalozzites sabalana Berry 1916a (Leaf spot on Sabalites), Alum Bluff, Florida,
U.S.A. Extant.
Subclass EUASCOMYCETES
Order PLECTASCALES
Family GYMNOASCACEAE
First, Tert U.Mioc: Ctenomycesserratus Eid., Randecker Maar, Germany (Riiffie 1963).
Extant.
176
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on December 2, 2020
Chapter 1:Thallophyta--1
Family ASPERGILLACEAE
First, Tert Eoc: Cryptocolax damensis and (7. parvula, Oregon, U.S.A. (Scott 1956). Extant.
C o m m e n t - PeniciUites curtipes Berkeley, Tert Olig, Baltic Amber, East Prussia (Hirmer 1927).
Order ERYSIPHALES
First, Tert Mioc: Erysiphites mdiUi Pampaloni 1902, MelilLi, Italy. Extant.
Order CHAETOMIALES
First, Tert Eoc: Caenomyces annulata Berry 1916b, Lagrange fm (Wilcox), Tennessee, U.S.A.
Extant.
Order SPHAERIALES("Pyrenomycetes")
First, Carb Bashk: Sphaeritesfeistmantelianus (Rabenhorst), Bohemia (Meschinelli, A. 1898,
p. 41). Also, Depazites rabenhorsti Geinitz (on fern foliage), Carb (Hirmer 1927). Extant.
Comanent- Chaetosphaerites poUenismilis (spores), Carb Tourn, Spitsbergen (Playford 1962).
Some Mesozoic Pyrenomycetes; abundant in Tertiary.
Order HYPOCREALES
First, Tert Mioc: Melanosporites stefani Pampoloni 1902, MefiUi, Sicily, Italy. Extant.
Order PHAClDIALES
First, Trias Rhaet: Xylomites intermedius Nathorst, Germany (Meschinelli, A. 1898). Extant.
Order PEZlZALES
First, Tert Mioc: Pezizites candidus Goeppert and Berendt, Baltic Amber (Hirmer 1927).
Extant.
C o m m e n t " Discomycetes (Phacidales to Tuberales) poorly represented by fossils.
Order TUBER.ALES(Truffles)
First, Q uat Pleist: Cenococcum geophilum Fries, but regarded as doubtful Pyrenomycetes by
Hirmer (1927). Extant.
Subclass LOCULO-ASCOMYCETES
Order DOTHIDEALES
First, Tert Eoc: Dothidites nerii Bureau and Patouillard, France (Meschinelli, A. 1898, p. 44).
Extant.
Comment: Dothidea borealis, Mioc, Iceland (Heer 1868).
Order HYSTERIALES
First, Carb Moscov: Hysterites cordaitis Grand'Eury 1877, France. Extant.
Order MICROTHYRIALES
First, Tert Eoc: Asterina sp., Eoc?, Tennessee, U.S.A. (Dilcher 1963). Also Microthyriacites
cooksoni Rao 1959, and M. sahnii Rao 1959, Eoc, Palana, Bikaner, India. Extant.
C o m n t e n t : Phragmothyrites eocenica Edwards 1922, Mull, Scotland, may prove to be pre-
Eocene.
Class BASIDIOMYCETES
Subclass HETEROBASIDIOMYCETES
Order UREDINALESFamily PUCCINIACEAE
First, Carb Bashk: Anthracomyces cannaUensis Renault and Teleutosporites milloti Renault (in
Lepidostrobus), France (Hirmer 1927). Extant.
C o m n t e n t : Next record Late Cret, Puccinites cretaceus Velenovsky (Fri5 & Bayer 1901).
177
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on December 2, 2020
Order TREMELLALES
First, Carb : Myxomycetes mangini Renault (Dacryomycetaceae ?) (Meschinelli, A. 1898, p. 71).
Extant.
S u b c l a s s HOMOBASIDIOMYCETES
Order POLYPORALES
Family HYDNACEAE
First, Tert Mioc: Hydnites argiUae (Ludwig), Germany (Meschinelli, A. 1898, p. 8).
Extant.
Family CLAVARIACEAE
First, Quat Pleist: Clavaria turbinata Murr 1926, Hotting breccia, Austria. Extant.
Family POLYPORACEAE
First, Carb Bashk-Moscov: Dactyloporus archaeus Herzer 1893, Ohio, U.S.A., and Pseudopoly-
porus carbonicus Hollick 1910, West Virginia, U.S.A. Extant.
Cmnnxent: Next record Mesozoic, China (Hsii 1953).
Order AGARIC,ALES
First, Carb Bashk: Archagaricon bulbosum and other spp., Hancock and Atthey 1869, Cramling-
ton, Northumberland, England. Extant.
Comanent: Next records Tert Mioc, Agaricites spp (Hirmer 1927); ?Agaricus cf. meUeus,
Mesozoic, Karlsdorf, (Felix 1894).
Order SCLERODERMATALES
First, Tert Eoc: Sderoderma einosl)oritesRouse 1962 (spores), Brothers Creek, British Columbia,
Canada. Extant.
Comanent: Geasterflorissantensis Cockerell 1908, Mioc, Colorado, U.S.A.
[K.I.M.C. & N.F.H.]
REFERENCES
Chapter 1: T h a l l o p h y t a - - I
EDWARDS, W. N. 1922. An Eocene microthyriaceous Fungus from Mull, Scotland. Trans. Br.
mycol. Soc., 7, 66-72.
ELLIS, D. 1917-18. Phycomycetous fungi from the English Lower Coal Measures. Proc. R. Soc.
Edinb., 38, 130-45.
F~LIX, J. 1894. Studien tiber fossile Pilge. Z. dr. geol. Ges., 46~ 269-280.
FRI~, A. & BA'~R, E. 1901. Studien ira Gebeite der b6hmischen Kreideformation. Arch.
naturw. Landes Durchforsch. B6hm., 9, no. 2.
GRAHAM, A. 1962. The role offungal spores in palynology. J. Paleont., 36, 60-68.
GRAND'EURY, C. 1877. Flora Carbonif~re du d~pt de la Loire et du centre de la France. M~m.
pr~s. div. Sav. Acad. Sci. Inst. Ft., 24, 624 pp., 33 pls.
HALKET, A. C. 1930. The rootlets ofAmyelon radicans Will; their anatomy, their apices and their
endophytic fungus. Ann. Bot., 44, 865-905.
HANCOCK, A. & ATTHEY, T. 1869. On some curious fossil fungi from the Black Shales of the
Northumberland Coalfield. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (4), 4e 221-228.
HAWKER, L. E. 1966. Fungi. Hutchinson, London.
HE~R, O. 1868. Flora Fossilis Arctica, Vol. 1. Schulthess, Ziirich.
HFRZF.R, H. 1893. A new fungus from Lower Coal Measures (Tuscarawas County, Ohio).
Am. Geol., 11, 365-366.
HIRMER, H. 1927. Handbuch der Paliiobotanik. Oldenburg, Mtinich and Berlin.
HOLLICK, A. 1910. A new fossil Polypore Pseudopolyporus carbonicus Hollick. Mycologia, 2,
93-95.
Hsu, J. 1953. On the occurrence of a fossil wood in association with fungous Hyphae from Chimo
of East Shantung. Palaeont. sin., 1, 84-86.
HUTCHINSON, S. A. & WALTON,J. 1953. A presumed Ascomycete from the Upper Carboni-
ferous. Nature, Lond., 172, 36-37.
K~DSTON, R. & LANO, W . H . 1921. On Old Red Sandstone Plants showing structure, from the
Rhynie Chert Bed, Aberdeenshire, Part V. The Thallophyta occurring in the Peat Bed.
Trans. R. Soc. Edinb., 52, 855-902.
M~SCHIN~LI~I, A. 1898. Fungorum fossilium omnium hucusque cognitorum Iconographia. Vicetiae,
144 pp, 31 pls.
MESCHINFLLI, L. 1898. Contributo alia micologia fossile. Su alcuni funghi terziari del Pied-
monte. Atti Ist. veneto Sci., 9, 7, 769-75, 2pl.
MOORE, L . R . 1963. Microbiological colonization and attack on some Carboniferous Miospores.
Palaeontology, 6, 349-372.
MURR, J. 1926. Neue Ubersicht tiber die fossile Flora der Hottinger Breccie. Jb. geol. Bunde-
sanst., Wien, 76, 153-70, 2pls.
PAMPALONI,L. 1902. I resti organici nel disodile de Melitti in Sicilia. Palaeontogr. ital., 8, 121-
130.
PLAaWORD, G. 1962. Lower Carboniferous Microfloras of Spitsbergen. Palaeontology, 5, 550-618.
RAO, A. R. 1959. Fungal remains from some Tertiary deposits of India. Palaeobotanist, 7,
43-46.
RousE, G . E . 1962. Plant microfossils from the Burrard Formation of British Columbia. Micro-
paleontology, 8, 187-218.
RUFFL~, L. 1963. Die obermioz~ine Flora yore Randecker Maar. Paliiont. Abh., 1, pt. 3.
SACCARDO, P. A. 1897. Syloge Fungorum. Patavii.
SCOTT, R . A . 1956. Cryptocolax, a new genus of fungi (Aspergillaceae) from the Eocene of Oregon.
Am. J. Bot., 43, 589-593.
SMrrH, JOHN. 1896. On the discovery of Microscopic Plants in the fossil amber of the Ayrshire
Coalfield. Trans. geol. Soc. Glasg., 10, 318-322.
STACH, E. 1957. Die Anschliff-Sporendiagnose des Ruhrkohlenfl6zes Baldur. Palaeontographica,
102B, 71-95.
STOPES, M. 1913. Catalogue of the Mesozoic plants in the British Museum: The Cretaceousflora,
Part 1, Bibliography, algae and fungi, 281 pp., 2 pls. London, British Museum (Natural
History).
179
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on December 2, 2020
[Professor] H. P. Banks
Department of Botany, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y., U.S.A.
K. I. M. Chesters, PH.D.
Department of Palaeontology, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London
SW7.
N. F. Hughes, M.A.F.O.S.
Department of Geology, Sedgwick Museum, Downing Street, Cambridge.
G. A. L. Johnson, PH.D.F.c.s.
Department of Geology, University Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham.
H. M. Johnson, ~J.sc. PH.D.V.c.s.
Department of Geology, University Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham.
[Professor] L. R. Moore, D.SC. PH.D.F.G.S.
Department of Geology, The University, Mappin Street, Sheffield 1.
180