Professional Documents
Culture Documents
7 Steps To Perfect Program Planning LONG PDF
7 Steps To Perfect Program Planning LONG PDF
Planning
Janet Bechman
Purdue University
2008
H
E
A
D
A Get pills Take pills Feel better
C
H
E
• Picture of a program
• Graphic representation of the program –
what is invested, what is done, what
results
• Core of program planning and evaluation
Common framework for your work
Purdue University is an Equal Opportunity/Equal Access institution.
Why Create a Logic Model?
• Brings detail to broad
goals
• Shows the ‘chain of events’
• Builds consensus
• Identifies gaps in logic &
uncertain assumptions
• Clarifies difference between
activities & outcomes
• Signals what to evaluate
• Summarizes key elements
Purdue University is an Equal Opportunity/Equal Access institution.
LOGIC MODEL
INPUTS OUTPUTS OUTCOMES-IMPACT
Activities Participation Short Medium Long-term
S
What we invest What we do Who we reach What the What the What the
I short term medium term ultimate
T results are results are impact(s) is
U Staff Workshops Participants Learning Action Conditions
Volunteers Meetings Customers
A Time Counseling Citizens Awareness Behavior
Money Facilitation Social
T Materials Assessments
Knowledge
Attitudes
Practice
Decisions Economic
I Equipment Product dev. Skills Policies Civic
Technology Media work Opinions Social action Environmental
O Partners Recruitment Aspirations
Training Reactions
N Motivations
ASSUMPTIONS
1)
2) ENVIRONMENT
3) Influential factors
4)
Purdue University is an Equal Opportunity/Equal Access institution.
Logic Model
Implementation
Situation Outcomes - Impact
Inputs and Outputs
Trends / Needed Learning Activities Short term Medium term Long Term
Desired Action Needs Inputs Participation Learning Action Impact
Situations (Objectives) (Resources) (Audience) Outcomes Outcomes
Economic
Social Workshops Viability
Economic Behavior Awareness Staff Meetings Participants Awareness Behavior
Civic Practice Knowledge Volunteers Counseling Customers / Knowledge Practice Strong Ind.
Environment Decisions Attitudes Time Facilitation Consumers Attitudes Decisions Fam. & Com
Policies Opinions Money Assessment Citizens Opinions Policies
Contributing Social action Aspirations Materials Product dev Aspirations Social action Healthy
Factors Motivations Equipment Media work Motivations Environment
Skills Technology Recruitment Skills
Partners Training Indicators