ἀλήθεια

Aletheia

Askêsis

O Que Não Escapa

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/presocratics/ check
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/protagoras/
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/parmenides/
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plato-aesthetics/
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/heidegger-aesthetics/index.html#ref-1
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/levinas/index.html#ref-1
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/information-semantic/
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/phenomenology-mg/
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/reinach/

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/episteme-techne/

Sobre escrita:
https://machinedeleuze.wordpress.com/2017/04/11/michel-foucault-a-escrita-
de-si/#_ednref27
Jorge Luís Borges - This Craft of Verse

Kierkegaard

“Because of his existentialist orientation, most of his interventions in

contemporary theory do double duty as means of working through events from
his own life. In particular Kierkegaard’s relations to his father and his fiancée
Regine Olsen pervade his work. Kierkegaard’s pseudonym Johannes Climacus
says of Socrates that “his whole life was personal preoccupation with himself,
and then Governance comes and adds world-historical significance to it.”
Similarly, Kierkegaard saw himself as a “singular universal” whose personal
preoccupation with himself was transfigured by divine Governance into
universal significance.”

Septuaginta (ocorrências aletheia no velho testamento):

https://www.blueletterbible.org/search/search.cfm?
criteria=ἀλήθεια&t=LXX#s=s_primary_0_1
Greek new testament (ocorrências aletheia no novo testamento):
https://www.blueletterbible.org/search/search.cfm?
criteria=ἀλήθεια&t=MGNT#s=s_primary_0_1

“A monkey can learn new things, of course, and retain memory. But a monkey
cannot engage in conscious recollection of specific events from its past in
order to construct an autobiography, imparting a sense of narrative and
meaning to its life.” Ramachandran, Tell-Tale Brain

“In Book I of Metaphysics, Aristotle claims that the earliest of these, among
whom he places the Milesians, explained things only in terms of their matter
(Met. I.3 983b6–18). This claim is anachronistic in that it presupposes
Aristotle’s own novel view that a complete explanation must encompass four
factors: what he called the material, efficient, formal, and final causes.”

“The Alexandrian Neoplatonist Simplicius (6th c. CE) appears to have

possessed a good copy of the work, from which he quoted extensively in his
commentaries on Aristotle’s Physics and De Caelo. He introduces his lengthy
quotation of fr. 8.1–52 as follows: “Even if one might think it pedantic, I would
gladly transcribe in this commentary the verses of Parmenides on the one
being, which aren’t numerous, both as evidence for what I have said and
because of the scarcity of Parmenides’ treatise.” Thanks to Simplicius’ lengthy
transcription, we appear to have the entirety of Parmenides’ major
metaphysical argument demonstrating the attributes of “What Is” (to eon) or
“true reality” (alêtheia).”

One may recall not only the famous case of Epimenides, who encountered Dike
and Aletheia during his long sleep in a cave (DK 3B 1)

Chuva Oblíqua VI
http://arquivopessoa.net/textos/873

Deste modo ou daquele modo

http://arquivopessoa.net/textos/1104