Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1990
Copyright (c) 1990 Pergamon Press pic. Printed in the USA.
0360-1293/90 $3.00+ .00
by
INTRODUCTION
Very little work has been done so far on luminescence from the
intact human subject. In one report count rates averaged 15%
over background. It w a s claimed that some individuals could
increase the rate up to 100% at will [7]. In addition, some of
our results have already appeared, together with a more extensive
review of the background [8].
Fig. 1. ^ 4
Equipment H*
set-up.
OLID HOUAING PRE-EMPLIFIER
REST/ Д H . I .
AMPLIFIER,
COUNTERS,
GUIDE ^ qusrtz
FOR P A I N jortOtomult.j- CONTROL-
of SUBJE
ELECTRONICS
REMOTE SWITCH
TEMPERATURE PROBE
AUDIO STATUS
CONTROL Я00Г",
FILE: PHOTONS.TOP
Fig. 2 . Plot SUBJECT: TUBE SPECTRUM
X UNITS: WAVELENGTH
efficiency X SEALS: 10 NO
versus MOAN: 15.82814
CONDITIONS:
240 260 Э20 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640
UAVELENGTH (NM)
Fig. 3 .
Histogram
of tube 6000
RILE: \PLOTS\PLOTDATA\T.TAP
Y UNITS. INSTANCES
5000 X UNITS: PHOTONS
X SCALE: 1 SEC
4500
MEAN: 961.5384
Β 3500 CONDITIONS:-
ER
£ 3000
NO. TRIALS: 75000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 2 « 2* 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 46 50
COUNTS P S R SECOND
88 ñ. E D W A R D S et al.
Method
RESULTS
Phosphorescence
Temporal variation
addition the error bars have been extended to take into account
any possible misalignment between measurements. Even so, a marked
variation with time must be admitted. Although several such
measurements have been made, the data are not sufficient for us
to perform a Fourier analysis to reveal diurnal periodicities
with any confidence.
Topographical variation
The count rates for five different areas of the body have been
measured for the two subjects MI and RT, and the results are
given in Table 1. The areas were chosen for ease of measurement,
given our constraints on the positioning of equipment. Exposure
times were around 6 minutes per location for each subject.
Estimates for the standard deviation based on the (a posteriori)
measured fluctuations in the rate are given in brackets. These
estimates include the contribution from the tube noise which has
been subtracted from the measured rates to give the nett rate for
each location.
Individual variation
It has been found from a series of trials that the two subjects
have consistently different rates from the hand (see the results
for the spectra below), but it is clear from these results that
there is no simple scaling factor linking the intensity of
bioluminescence between like regions of the body. The largest
difference is between the foreheads of the two subjects, although
the rates detected from the lower back, hand, and forehead are
all significantly different. So far, we have found that the
distribution of light over the locations in question remains
broadly constant for a particular individual.
Table 1. Rates (in cps) detected from different areas of the body
for two subjects.
canditicna:-
0 1 1 1 4 9 4 7 t · 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 3 1 « 17 111» 10 l i 13 33 34 3 5 2 4 2 7 1 ·
baekgtound
0 10 20 30 «0 И «0 t0 ·θ M 100
nusber оГ 10 » e e . period*
HUMAN BIOLUMINESCENCE 91
Source of luminescence
Since both the hand and forehead have relatively high populations
of surface bacteria, the above results suggest that bacterial
luminescence might be reponsible for the high counts from these
areas. To test this idea, we measured the luminescence from the
print left by the forehead (unwashed for 24 hours) on a copper
sheet. However, the increase in rate above background was less
than 1 cps.
Spectra
Figures 7-10 show results for the spectral density of light from
two subjects on different days. The visible spectrum is divided
up into four bands approximately corresponding to the colors:
blue, green, yellow, and red. The vertical axis measures the
spectral density of radiation as seen from the surface of the
skin corrected for aperture and filter losses, and for the
spectral sensitivity of the tube. The error bars define the + l
std. dev. as estimated from a combination of the Poisson
statistics of the photon counts and the uncertainty in the tube
sensitivity - the latter being greatest at the red end of the
spectrum.
• Ц Е Л Е Н RI {г)
"i"
6 OD
SOS «00
u>v*length ( n a ) i n v e ì ength (по)
Fig. 10·
s u b j e c t : ΠΙ ( 2 )
500 600
Wevelertgtb {ft»)
HUMAN BIOLUMINESCENCE 93
DISCUSSION
The mainly red colour of the light agrees generally with what
others have found from mammalian tissues and cells, and have
attributed to oxidative production of radicals. It is likely,
however that the shorter wavelengths have been underestimated,
because they will be more strongly absorbed by the tissues. For
this reason a significant contribution in the ultraviolet
remains possible.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors are very grateful for the support of John Hine Ltd.
(Borden, Hampshire, U.K.)
REFERENCES
(5) Popp, F.-Α., Li, Κ.Η., Mei, W.P., Galle, M., and
Neurohr, R., Physical Aspects of Biophotons. Experientia Vol
44, 576-585, 1988.
(6) Popp, F-A., Becker, G., Konig, L. and Peshka, W., Photon
storage in b i o l o g i c a l s y s t e m s . In Electromagnetic
B i o i n f o r m a t i o n . E d s . F-A. P o p p , et a l . . U r b a n and
Schwartzenberg, Munich, 1979.