Professional Documents
Culture Documents
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/766483?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Taylor & Francis, Ltd. and Royal Musical Association are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize,
preserve and extend access to Journal of the Royal Musical Association
CATHERINE DALE
But, he continued in the same essay, 'it was not only the expectation
success which filled me with joy. It was another and a more impo
matter, I believed I had now found my own personal style of com
ing',' and he reaffirmed this view 11 years later in the essay 'On Rev
Toujours': 'Now I have established my style. I know now how I ha
compose.'2 He immediately sought to capitalize on this style and b
a second Chamber Symphony on 1 August 1906, only one month a
completing the first. By the autumn of 1907 he had produced a still
mentary continuous draft in short score of bars 1-143 and 166-251 w
is retained almost intact in the final version, with the exception of s
modifications in the orchestration and a few minor revisions in the inner
parts. In spite of his initial enthusiasm for the project, however,
Schoenberg found himself unable to complete this or any other large-
scale work for two years, and although he had begun to copy a full score
he had laid this aside in August 1908, shortly after the completion of
the Second String Quartet.
The compositional history of the Second Chamber Symphony, op. 38,
is thus bound up with at least four phases in Schoenberg's development:
its conception and fragmentary working out in 1906-8, two further abor-
tive attempts to complete it in 1911 and 1916, and its completion in 1939.
In the 1906-8 phase, however, the tonal beginnings of the Second
Chamber Symphony lay at a tangent to Schoenberg's atonal preoccupa-
tions, and from the winter of 1906-7 its composition was largely sup-
planted by that of several other works, notably the beginnings of
' Arnold Schoenberg, Style and Idea, ed. Leonard Stein (London, 1975), 30-53 (p. 49).
2 Ibid., 108-10 (p. 109).
' Sketchbook III was begun in April 1906 and originally belonge
in the possession of Schoenberg's widow, Gertrud, together w
manuscripts in Schoenberg's own handwriting (including first dr
sketchbooks and all paintings and drawings unless another owner
The Works of Arnold Schoenberg: A Catalogue of his Compositions, Wr
Newlin, London, 1962). It is currently housed at the Arnold Sch6nb
grateful thanks are due for the loan of all sketch material. The s
cover with the inscription 'Skizzen' and consists of 175 numbe
19 x 36.5 cm, which have been written on up to p. 132; between
have been cut out. Where dates of sketches are available they
Edward T. Cone, 'Sound and Syntax: An Introduction to Schoe
tives of New Music, 13 (1974), 21-40.
' Allen Forte, 'Schoenberg's Creative Evolution: The Path to Ato
(1978), 133-76.
6 Schoenberg, Style and Idea, 30-53 (p. 49).
TABLE 1
PRINCIPAL CONTENTS OF SKETCHBOOK III
Op. 9 opened up new paths: its harmony, with its extremely tight-knit rela
tion to the motivic-thematic occurrences, thrusts out to the very limits of t
tonal system. In this respect the Second Chamber Symphony represent
regression: neither can its harmony be regarded as a further step towards t
dissolution of tonality, nor are its harmonic formations so organically root
in the structure of the musical substance as is the case in Op. 9.7
The Second Chamber Symphony, in contrast to the First, accepts its term
of tonal reference rather than constantly seeking to overthrow them,
although its rate of harmonic change appears slower and its harmo
language more conservative than those of op. 9 as a result of its m
lyrical, homophonic style, the dissonance in this work results not so muc
from the use of conventionally dissonant intervals (as was the case with
the whole tones and fourths of op. 9), although these do exist, or fr
a proliferation of appoggiaturas and suspensions with delayed resol
tions, as from the juxtaposition of distantly related tonal triads modifi
by dissonant additions and arrived at by means of uncompromisin
semitone movement in the parts. This conjunction of triadic forms
similar in principle to Bruckner's juxtaposition of entire phrases in ton
areas that would normally require considerable preparation and lin
ing. In Schoenberg, however, it is telescoped to form a vocabulary of ad
jacent chords exemplified by the theme in bars 62-7 of the first moveme
in which the movement of the parts by step leads away from and retur
to a C major triad, followed by A major and a seventh chord on C
third inversion, as shown in Example 1.
This semitone voice-leading had tended to give rise in the First Chambe
Symphony to the fourth chords that featured so prominently in this earl
work and now constituted an integral element of the 'settled style' that
Schoenberg wished to maintain in his Second Chamber Symphony. C
trary to Schmidt's assertion that the work's 'harmonic formations'
not so 'organically rooted in the structure of the musical substance
is the case in Op. 9', however, both the perfect fourths (together w
their inversion to the perfect fifth) and the semitone steps are in f
projected in both a horizontal and a vertical dimension. Indeed, Kl
Velten maintains that 'while the fifth leap stresses the tonic and thereb
suggests the tonality, the chromatic step oversteps the tonal boun
daries', and the opening theme (bars 1-11), shown in Example
demonstrates its derivation from these two intervals, the perfect fifth (
and the minor second (b). The third statement of the perfect fifth is co
tracted to the perfect fourth (c) in bar 4 and is succeeded by the semito
eb'-fb'. The direction of the semitone (b) is reversed on the final be
of bar 3, where it is followed by the perfect fourth. The descending form
of the semitone is designated as '(b)' in Example 2. This three-no
7 Schoenberg, II. Kammersymphonie, op. 38, ed. Christian M. Schmidt, Philharmonia score N
461 (Vienna, 1952), 3-11 (p. 6).
8 Klaus Velten, Sch6nbergs Instrumentation Bachscher und Brahmsscher Werke als Dokumente sein
Traditions Verstindnisses (Regensburg, 1975), 91.
Example 1. Schoenb
62-7.
62 < >
A I 6l i
?3 14!
66
4O 6.V 4 riF
Adagio
9
d II 1- 6 l u I I
I 1
(a) -IL(b)-
-- ~(==- f
Example 3. Schoenb
9-10.
9 Fl.
VVlas
Example 4. Schoenber
22
A22 Cls.
Hrn 1
Vc. I (theme 2)
p3 - v
Example 5. Schoenberg,
vinIA A A
Vln I
Hrn 1
V12
H
47 Fls.
~PP
Vc. I
Vc. II
Cbs.
18 Vln I
Vc. I
Vlas
Vc. II
Cbs.
43
I?IF.A
Example 9. Schoen
138-43; transcriptio
ed. Schmidt, 170.
""Y ; ?i ; . _ 7...
. , po,+
~I-I I
.,_---,
I "
,+,..:
" ,
". .. .... p.
trOt
M i___ ...
[ :1
9 Glenn Gould, record notes for Schoenberg Works (conducted by Pierre Boulez), CBS
Masterworks 79349 (1982).
10 Arnold Schoenberg, 'Affirmations', cited in Schoenberg, ed. Merle Armitage (New York,
1977), 251-2.
" Arnold Schoenberg, letter to Alexander von Zemlinsky dated 12 December 1916. The
original German, cited below, is given in Zemlinsky's Briefwechsel mit Schonberg, Webern, Berg und
Schreker, ed. Horst Weber (Darmstadt, 1995), 158-9, and is translated here by the present author:
'Ich habe mich entschlossen, meine II. Kammersymphonie, die ich 1907 (!) angefangen habe
und die bis jetzt liegen geblieben ist fertig zu machen. Es sind 2 Sditze da. Der eine fertig bis
auf die Schlu3takte, der andere zur Hilfte fertig. Die verschmelze ich zu einem Satz. Das ist der
erste Teil. Ich plane ndimlich einen 2.te Teil ... aber es ist m6glich, daB ich den doch nicht
mache.'
"1 Schoenberg, letter to Alexander von Zemlinsky dated 12 December 1916. The
German is given ibid., 159-60, and is translated here by the present author: 'Ich wer
das Stiick nicht ffir Solo-Instrumente schreiben, sondern sofort eine ganz neue Part
(mittelgro3es) Orchester schreiben. .... Mit der II hoffe ich in wenigen Tagen fertig
wenn nichts dazwischen kommt!' Schoenberg's reference to the initial conception of
for solo instruments emphasizes the relationship between the 1906 draft of the Second C
Symphony and the First Chamber Symphony, op. 9. To the 15 solo instruments of t
he added a second flute, a second viola, a second cello and a double bassoon.
Although this text is most frequently associated with the 1916 phase of
composition owing to the fact that this is the latest date of composition
that precedes it in the sketchbook, the folio on which the text is written
(1181-4), like f. 1185-", has been inserted and, since parts of the music on
these sheets date unquestionably from 1911, it is possible that the text
may also have been written before 1916.15 It begins with the symbolic
words 'To continue further along this path was not possible', and it charts
the progression of the soul from sadness through contentment to despair
and sorrow. The cause of this sorrow does not lie in external phenomena,
however, but within the soul itself, and may be perceived not as an end
but as a new beginning, a means of salvation, towards which all previous
experience was directed.
The impossibility for Schoenberg of continuing further along his par-
ticular path was apparent not only in the case of the Second Chamber
"" These include the string-orchestra versions of Verkldrte Nacht and the Second String
Quartet, op. 10, in 1917 and c.1919 respectively, an arrangement for chamber ensemble (with
Felix Greissle) of op. 16, nos. 1, 2, 4 and 5 in 1919, the full-orchestra version of op. 9 and an
arrangement for mezzo-soprano, 17 instruments and percussion of 'Lied der Waldtaube' from
Gurrelieder in 1922.
" See Michael Graubart, review of Stuckenschmidt, Arnold Schoenberg: His Life, World and
Work, Tempo, 111 (1974), 44-9, MacDonald, Schoenberg (London, 1976), 6-7, and H. H.
Stuckenschmidt, Arnold Schoenberg: His Life, World and Work, trans. Humphrey Searle (London,
1974), 93-7.
" Schoenberg, letter 264 to Gustav Mahler dated 2 August 1910, Arnold Schoenberg Letters,
selected and ed. Erwin Stein, trans. Eithne Wilkins and Ernst Kaiser (London, 1964), 297.
Violin
IIIV W 1 1 1 | /I 1 1I
ILJ Ir"
--I. v i 6 m i : |J .v7 J i . ] .
Example 10 (cont.)
(c)
.. . "A,- -L"
wI V -- Ji
Bhi
(d)
I rI
I- I
I_ IiIhIrnI
[ op
Example 10 (cont.)
(e)
4 :, 6. i /-
9(
-3
,M ,, " - ' ., .
Example 10 (cont.)
(g)
(h)
"i)L 7 -1
(i)
wif 3 1
I- J -
(i) MUM W?
Example 10 (cont.)
(k)
Ipoco pesante
poco pesante
16
V i w
(a)
(b)
Example 11 (cont.)
(c)
' Schoenberg, letter 216 to Rene Leibowitz dated 4 July 1947, Arnold Schoenberg Letters, 248.
a 2
Obs.
..f - --c _ L
As.
Cls.
a2
if
f ff
if
Hms
3 f -f=
VA I
31 32
Vc.
Cb.I
- i# ll " I qup
Example 12 (cont.)
33 34 352
A. 1 , 16 k...a2 -C
Ob s. a2
HObs. I*
L 1 77
I a 2Su1~L-I-l~~
Fgs. oil, ol
120)
CI. tq I Y J ,
cresc.
Hrns Va"2
cresc.
33 34 35
Cbs.
lI l1 I
^~~~~~~ , .:_ F
fP
-" ? . "
0C ,-
Vc.b . -6
" u-'is.
. L' A --A
I"I -,
.....
C.ff
i1212
I p -9. ~k~T
14 1J
k 'ft, I LL--bth CS1
Figure 2. Schoenberg, S
2 Schoenberg, letter to
Schoenberg, 65.
I.s.
Ob. 1
Ob. 2
Eng. wL
hrn
Fgs.
w,.f
Tpts , "
78 79
Vln II
Via
V"IV,, ] n[ 11I J '+1'
V c. 44 -04 1- ,4"4 w +
Cb.
IDIO, 6.I 7 I+.,r. u o u,- 10C
vc.
Example 13 (cont.)
80 81 a2
aFs. f.
SjA A f
Obs. 1 f
If
Fgs. -: i-
Hrns Av o.D. mf
V.. I
f Al
Vc.
w1 6
L Mi
.ff
.
12419
'?.
I-Wr
- Y..-.
ft(6) p k, A,-S
t4.
.. . 'TT~ i. i
a~all
.. . -- ... . _ -
C I
!~ ~ r~,
' ,_ //
.,,---,-k--'-2'--'- ~
Figure 3. Schoenberg, S
ItI
A i
7~ 1 -84 1,
appear in imitation of
motive forms are nota
note rows. In sketch 12
only two notes to be r
The stylistic changes
late periods become mos
movement drafted in 1
particularly that of t
material returns. Altho
in this final phase, they
archies. Connections b
by means of voice-leadi
ficient to suggest tona
in both the late neo-tonal and the serial works of the 1930s and 1940s
thus became one of triadic harmony that existed independent
hierarchical structure of key-centred tonality, and he wrote in t
'Opinion or Insight?' (1926) of the 'paralysing' of the tradition
claims of the tonal triad:
My formal sense ... tells me that to introduce even a single tonal triad
lead to consequences, and would demand space which is not availabl
my form. A tonal triad makes claims on what follows, and, retrospect
on all that has gone before; nobody can ask me to overthrow everythi
Fl. 1 LI
Obs.a V II
a2
f
Vc r a2
244 2 248
Vln I
un unis.
-All (pizz.)
Sunis.
.arco
Via
244 745
AAarco
arcoH
Example 14 (cont.)
250 251
249 a2
Fls.
f Sf
a2
Obs.
b. , II
Fgs.LO=
f f sf
HMSp
-C:
AJ?
249 250 1 251
4 E
if
Via lad#
M 4r~o
.WNW~
L I-
Y i C'' t I b~UT o
fly rb
7ro'' _-
F T:m,p
IoIV
3
I .l 1 - _
I I I I
_1r I'r
. .............
__r
-7"I, !K
II I _
saved
the me. .... as
question, I believe
soon as that to use
someone has the conso
found a t
fying or paralysing their formal claims.24
LL
r.,] , / .. . ,
[i]_
Odh 0 LZe
F ! I F {II
q-< Jr
rf 6 i~
opening m
become mu
entities in
without ton
of fourth c
by step fro
on Bb and a
ment of th
movement
and creates
equivalence
tary epilogu
motivic ges
In all Schoe
modes of th
Nidre, op. 3
exploit aspe
Buonaparte
features of
ity is either
(b)
.......... 1I! -1 ,
p41
role within the serial language, there occurs a synthesis of styles which
creates an entirely new one and is not simply a return to a 'bygone
aesthetic'.25
" Schoenberg, cited in Willi Reich, Schoenberg: A Critical Biography, trans. Leo Blac
(London, 1971), 49.
" Schoenberg, Style and Idea, 108-10 (pp. 108-9).
University of Hull
Obs.
Pp
1I(
Cls. p P
Fg. 1
p P~ PP (m.D.)
Tpts
Molto adagio (J =69) P
1
467 468 0 (!)
pp -
VIns. 2
Vlas 2
o 0
lptll? IA I
: ( -
Cbs.
149
A I
158 159
r2L ,6 i 041." 1I I 1 6
162
Ap
-3?
"l
v-i-vim
- j v 1
b?