You are on page 1of 150

Survey Respondent Information What specification do you follow for aggregate gradation requ

FA
FA Gradations
Gradations FA & Quality -
FA & Quality - Gradations Combinatio
Gradations AASHTO M- & Quality - n (Please
State/ Email & Quality - 6, M43 & DOT explain
Name Province Address ASTM C33 M80 Specific further)

Combinatio
waldropa@ n (Please
dot.state.al. explain
Drew Waldrop AL us further)

vijay.jain@d DOT
vijay jain CA ot.ca.gov Specific

Eric.Prieve AASHTO M-
@state.co.u 6, M43 &
Eric Prieve CO s M80

michael.ber
gin@dot.sta
Michael Bergin FL te.fl.us ASTM C33

Combinatio
n (Please
djohnson@ explain
Darrell Johnson GA dot.ga.gov further)
todd.hanson
@dot.iowa. DOT
Todd Hanson IA gov Specific

Clint.Hoops
@itd.idaho. DOT
Clint Hoops ID gov Specific

James.Krstu
lovich@illin DOT
James Krstulovich IL ois.gov Specific

Rodney@ks DOT
Rodney Montney KS dot.org Specific

AASHTO M-
Tyson.Rupn 6, M43 &
Tyson Rupnow LA ow@la.gov M80

statonj@mic DOT
John F. Staton MI higan.gov Specific

maria.maste
n@state.mn DOT
Maria Masten MN .us Specific
Brett.Trautm
an@modot. DOT
Brett Trautman MO mo.gov Specific

Combinatio
n (Please
maneedha explain
Matt Needham MT m@mt.gov further)

AASHTO M-
ocordle@nc 6, M43 &
Owen Cordle NC dot.gov M80

cschumaker DOT
Clayton Schumaker ND @nd.gov Specific

Lieska.hals
ey@nebras
Lieska Halsey NE ka.gov
tolson@dot. DOT
Troy Olson NV state.nv.us Specific

Combinatio
daniel.miller n (Please
@dot.state. explain
Dan Miller OH oh.us further)

AASHTO M-
kseward@o 6, M43 &
Kenny Seward OK dot.org M80

darin.hodge
s@state.sd. DOT
Darin Hodges SD us Specific

andy.naranj
o@txdot.go
Andy Naranjo TX v ASTM C33

AASHTO M-
bryanlee@u 6, M43 &
Bryan Lee UT tah.gov M80

Combinatio
n (Please
russelm@w explain
Mark Russell WA sdot.wa.gov further)
mark.lloyd DOT
Mark Lloyd WI @dot.wi.gov Specific
or aggregate gradation requirements? What is your nominal maximum ag

CA
CA Gradation &
Gradation & CA Quality -
CA Quality - Gradation & Combinatio Aggregate gradations are
Gradation & AASHTO M- Quality - n (Please specified in our Standard Pavin
Quality - 6, M43 & DOT explain Specs (Section 801 for CA, Pavin g- Pavin
ASTM C33 M80 Specific further) Other (please specify)
802 for FA), with alternate g - 3" 2.5" g - 2"
gradations approved for
specific classes of mixes. The
Combinatio standard gradations in these
n (Please specs are nearly identical to
explain the gradations in M43 and
further) M80.

DOT
Specific

AASHTO M-
6, M43 &
M80 2.5"

ASTM C33

Combinatio
n (Please AASHTO T-27 CA State
explain Specification for -10
further) Gradation
DOT CA gradation is same as
Specific ASTM C 33

DOT
Specific

DOT
Specific

Our KDOT Specs are loosely


DOT derived fromaggregates
Our coarse the ASTM have
and
Specific AASHTO Specs.
either option to meet ASTM
67, 57, etc. gradations or a
little more lenient DOTD
Combinatio specific gradation allowing a
n (Please little more finer material. This
explain is used for the gravel
further) producers local to LA. 2"

MnDOT uses DOT Specific


Gradations for Coarse and
Fine Aggregate for General
DOT Concrete. We are
Specific transitioning to ASTM C33 for
general concrete. For High
Performance Bridges and
Concrete Paving we require
composite gradations that do
DOT not need to comply with
Specific specific gradations.
Concrete aggregate
requirements are contained in
Section 1005 of the Missouri
DOT Standard Specifications for
Specific Highway Construction.

Combinatio
n (Please Allow AASHTO/ASTM
explain Gradations and Combined
further) Gradations.

AASHTO M-
6, M43 &
M80

DOT
Specific

FA & CA Gradation AASHTO


T 27 Quality AASHTO T84,
T85, T96, T104 and Nebraska
modified T103
DOT
Specific

AASHTO size requirements


Combinatio but allow for slight
n (Please modifications in band range to
explain meet Producer's specific
further) material.

AASHTO M-
6, M43 & We slightly alter the
M80 gradations for local sources.

DOT
Specific
TxDOT has 8 grades of
coarse agg. TxDOT grades 4-
6 meet ASTM C 33 grades 57,
67, and 7 respectively.
Combinatio TxDOT grade 2 closely
n (Please follows ASTM C 33 grade 467
explain except fo the No.4 sieve
further) which is 0-10% passsing.

AASHTO M-
6, M43 &
M80 WSDOT allows the use of
coarse aggregate based on
AASHTO gradations or a DOT
specific optimized gradation
based on a 0.45 power curve.
WSDOT's fine aggregate
specification is DOT specific.
AASHTO No. 4[1] 2-inch
-
100 1 1/2-inch -
90-100 1-inch
100
20-55 3/4-inch 90-
100 0-15
3/8-inch 20-55
0-5 No. 4
Combinatio 0-10 -
AASHTO M- n (Please No. 8 0-5
6, M43 & explain - [1] Size No.
M80 further) according to AASHTO M43.
your nominal maximum aggregate size for different concrete applications?  Nominal maximum aggregate size is def

Bridg Bridg Bridg Bridg Bridg Bridg Bridg Bridg Bridg


Pavin Pavin Pavin Pavin Pavin e e e e e e e e e
g- Pavin g - g- g- g- Decks Decks Decks Decks Decks Decks Decks Decks Decks
1.5" g - 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" N/A - 3" - 2.5" - 2" - 1.5" - 1" - 3/4" - 1/2" - 3/8" - N/A

N/A 1"

1.5" 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8"

3/4"

1" 1"

1" 1"
1" 1"

1.5" 3/4"

1.5" 1"

1" 1"

1"

1.5" 1"

1.5" 3/4"
1.5" 3/4"

1.5" 1" 3/4" 1.5" 1" 3/4"

1" 1"

3/4" 3/4"

3/4" 3/4"
1.5" 1.5" 1" 3/4"

1" 1"

1" 3/4"

3/4" 3/4"

1.5" 3/4"

1.5" 1"
1.5" 1.5"
um aggregate size is defined at the top sieve size retaining 5% or more of coarse aggregate.  Please round to the clo

Bridg Bridg Bridg Bridg Bridg Bridg Bridg Bridg Bridg


e e e e e e e e e
Struct Struct Struct Struct Struct Struct Struct Struct Struct Gener Gener Gener Gener Gener Gener
ures ures ures ures ures ures ures ures ures al al al al al al
(Gene (Gene (Gene (Gene (Gene (Gene (Gene (Gene (Gene Concr Concr Concr Concr Concr Concr
ral) - ral) - ral) - ral) - ral) - ral) - ral) - ral) - ral) - ete - ete - ete - ete - ete - ete -
3" 2.5" 2" 1.5" 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" N/A 3" 2.5" 2" 1.5" 1" 3/4"

1" 1"

3/4" 1/2" 3/8" 1" 3/4"

1" 1.5"

1" 1"

1" 1"
1" 1"

3/4" 3/4"

2" 2"

1" 1"

1" 2"

1" 1"

3/4" 3/4"
3/4" 3/4"

1.5" 1" 3/4" 1.5" 1" 3/4"

1" 1"

3/4" 3/4"

3/4" 3/4"
1.5" 1" 3/4" 1.5" 1" 3/4"

1" 1"

1" 1"

3/4" 3/4"

1"

N/A
1.5"
 Please round to the closest size if you are in-between listed sizes.

Partia
Gener Gener Gener Bridg Bridg Bridg Bridg Bridg Bridg Bridg Bridg Bridg Partia l Partia
al al al e e e e e e e e e l Depth l
Concr Concr Concr Overl Overl Overl Overl Overl Overl Overl Overl Overl Depth Repai Depth
ete - ete - ete - ays - ays - ays - ays - ays - ays - ays - ays - ays - Repai rs - Repai
1/2" 3/8" N/A 3" 2.5" 2" 1.5" 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" N/A rs - 3" 2.5" rs - 2"

1"

1/2" 3/8" 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8"

1/2"

3/4"

1"
1/2"

3/8"

3/4" 1/2"

1/2"

1/2"

3/4"

1/2"
1/2"

1/2" 3/8"

1/2"

1/2"

1/2"
3/8"

N/A

3/4"

3/8"

N/A 1/2"

N/A N/A
N/A N/A
Partia Partia Partia Partia Partia
l Partia l l l l Full Full Full Full Full Full
Depth l Depth Depth Depth Depth Full Depth Full Depth Full Depth Depth Depth Depth
Repai Depth Repai Repai Repai Repai Depth Repai Depth Repai Depth Repai Repai Repai Repai
rs - Repai rs - rs - rs - rs - Repai rs - Repai rs - Repai rs - rs - rs - rs -
1.5" rs - 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" N/A rs - 3" 2.5" rs - 2" 1.5" rs - 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" N/A

1" 1"

3/8" 3/8"

1/2" 3/4"

1/2" 1"

N/A 1"
1" 1"

3/8" 3/4"

N/A 1"

N/A 1"

3/4" 1"

3/4" 1"

3/8" 3/4"
1/2" 3/4"

3/4" 3/4"

1/2" 1"

3/4" 3/4"

3/4" 3/4"
N/A 1.5" 1" 3/4"

N/A 1"

1" 1"

3/8" 3/4"

N/A 1.5"

3/8" 3/8"
N/A 1.5"
Self- Self- Self- Self- Self- Self- Self- Self- Self-
Cons Cons Cons Cons Cons Cons Cons Cons Cons
olidati olidati olidati olidati olidati olidati olidati olidati olidati
ng ng ng ng ng ng ng ng ng
Concr Concr Concr Concr Concr Concr Concr Concr Concr
ete - ete - ete - ete - ete - ete - ete - ete - ete - Other Other Other Other Other Other
3" 2.5" 2" 1.5" 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" N/A - 3" - 2.5" - 2" - 1.5" - 1" - 3/4"

N/A

3/8"

N/A

3/8"

1/2"
3/4" 1"

3/4"

N/A

3/4"

N/A

3/4"
1/2"

3/4"

1" 1"

N/A

1/2"
3/4" 1/2" 3/8"

N/A 1"

3/4"

1/2"

3/4"

N/A
N/A
Do you require optimized gradations for any of your concr

Other Other Other 8-18 - Bridge 8-18 - Bridge


- 1/2" - 3/8" - N/A Other (please specify) 8-18 - Paving Decks Superstructure
We do not specify a nominal max for
paving, only that the contractor must
perform combined gradation analysis.
We currently do not have an
approved spec for SCC; however,
one is under development and it
N/A called for a nominal max of 3/4".

N/A
Other: Drilled Shaft, Drilled Shaft
Sign Structure, and Light Tower
Foundation Bridge Overlays: 3/4"
for microsilica, high-reactivity
metakaolin, fly ash, and GGBF slag
overlay mix designs; 1/2" for latex
1/2" overlay mix designs

N/A

Paving Bridge Decks


MoDOT specifies the maximum top
size that can be used (i.e. 100%
passing) Paving - 2 inch Max. Top
Size Bridge Decks, Bridge
structures, and General Concrete - 1
inch Max. Top Size Bridge Overlays
and Partial Depth Repairs - 3/4 inch
Max. Top Size Full Depth Repairs - 1
inch Max. Top Size SCC - 3/4 inch
Max. Top Size

Paving
The reason for checking more than
one aggregate size is our plans will
call for a large size aggregate (for
example 1.5") but our specifications
will allow for a smaller size aggregate
in which the contactors almost always
opts for.

Concrete bridge patching allows for


either 1" or 3/8" depending on the
3/8" thickness and depth of the repair.

Paving

N/A

Nominal Max sizes are dictated by


form dimensions (not larger than 1/5
the narrowest dimensions between
form sides), slab depths (no larger
than 1/3 the slab depths), and
reinforcing clearances (not larger
than 3/4 the minimum clear distance
between reinforcing bars.)

The maximum aggregate sized for


structural concrete is limited by the
clearance between forms, rebar
and/or slab thickness.
Maximum aggregate size is one-third
the smallest spacing between
N/A reinforcing steel.
tions for any of your concrete mixes? Please check all that apply.

8-18 - Self- CF & WF -


8-18 - General Consolidating CF & WF - CF & WF - Bridge
Concrete Concrete 8-18 - Other Paving Bridge Decks Superstructure

Paving
Paving Bridge Decks

Other

Paving Bridge Decks

Paving Bridge Decks


Bridge
Paving Bridge Decks Superstructure

Paving

Paving

Paving

Bridge Decks
Other
CF & WF - CF & WF - Self- 0.45 power 0.45 power
General Consolidating CF & WF - 0.45 power curve - Bridge curve - Bridge
Concrete Concrete Other curve - Paving Decks Superstructure

Paving
Bridge Decks
Paving
Paving

Paving

Paving
Other
0.45 power
0.45 power curve - Self-
curve - General Consolidating 0.45 power Other - Bridge Other - Bridge
Concrete Concrete curve - Other Other - Paving Decks Superstructure

Bridge
Paving Bridge Decks Superstructure
Other

Bridge
Paving Bridge Decks Superstructure
Bridge
Paving Bridge Decks Superstructure

General
Concrete
Bridge
Paving Bridge Decks Superstructure

Paving
Other
Do you have a spreadsheet
that you use for optimized a
gradation mixes, and do you
you require contractor to use
include a link to any
spreadsheets/software for y
optimized gradation
spreadsheet/software that a
online.

Other - Self- Agency


Other - General Consolidating Spreadsheet/S
Concrete Concrete Other - Other Other (please specify) oftware

We do not required optimized gradations


for bridge & general concrete, but we do
permit producers to design their mixes
using optimized gradations. No

Self-
General Consolidating
Concrete Concrete Per Caltrans 2010 standard specification Yes

No

Producer selects the aggregate size that


will provide the best performance during
placing. The producer may blend but is
required to meet a C33 gradation. No
Yes

Optimized gradations are not normally


specified, except at the Districts'
discretion. For example, one District
8-18 is optional
requires for gradations
optimized all concretewhen
pumping bridge deck concrete.
Otherwise, the tools and information for
blending aggregate gradations are
provided by the Department in its PCC
Level III Technician training course
Other material. Yes

We do not require Optimized Gradations


on any of our Standard Concrete Mixes.
We will allow them on any of the mixes. Yes

We require the 5-20 gradation (similar to


Self- the 8-18) on all paving concretes and
General Consolidating allow the use of the combined gradation
Concrete Concrete 5-20 on all other types of concrete. Yes

Other state specific criteria which


support the CF&WF optimization
requirements Yes
For Paving we give an incentive for
optimized gradations based on 8-18 and
Zone 2-A. For High Performance
Bridges we require the Contractor to
provide their best effort optimized
gradation. Yes
Please note Missouri does not require
the use of optimized mixes. The
contractor has the option to utilize
optimized mixes. Optimized mixes can
be used for paving, bridge decks, bridge
Self- structures, SCC, and general concrete.
General Consolidating MoDOT currently uses CF & WF to
Concrete Concrete evaluate optimized mix designs. Yes

MDT allows but does not require


optimized/combined gradations for the
above types of concrete. Yes

No, but we some producers have used


these methods No

No

Yes
Self-
General Consolidating Do not know what 8-18 or CF & WF
Concrete Concrete Other stand for. No

No

Do not require, it is optional to optimize. No

Yes

Optimized graded agregate mixes is in


option and is not required. Only area in
the State routinely specifiies optimized
graded mixes for paving concrete. We
use a modification to the 8-18 method. Yes

Not a requirement but we have


developed a special provision for bridge
decks using the WF chart. Yes

Optimized gradations are optional. No


Gradation may be required on a project-
by-project basis. WisDOT is currently
drafting optimized aggregate gradation
Other specifications for concrete paving.
be produced from
you have a spreadsheet or software crushing gravel, granite,
at you use for optimized aggregate sandstone, or quartzite
adation mixes, and do you have one which may be used
either as a blend with
u require contractor to use?  Please natural sand or as one
lude a link to any hundred percent of the
readsheets/software for your total fine aggregate.
timized gradation Gravel used to produce
manufactured sand for
readsheet/software that are available Do you allow any manufactured materials as a substitution for
use in concrete
ine. aggregate? pavement or bridge
superstructure concrete
(except prestress
concrete) shall have a
bulk specific gravity
greater than 2.550
(AASHTO T 85).
Manufactured sand
produced from crushing
limestone shall not be
used in bridge decks or
concrete pavement.
Contractor However, manufactured
Spreadsheet/S Other (please limestone sand may be
oftware specify) No Yes (Please explain) Other
used in(please specify)
prestressed or
precast concrete, or
cast in place concrete,
which will not be
exposed to vehicular
traffic, if approved by
No Yes (Please explain) the Engineer."

we allow manufactured
Yes (Please explain) light weight aggregate

No No
Screens are allowed in
some portions of the
state simply because
there are no fine
aggregte sources within
No Yes (Please explain) a reasonable distance.
one of our
training
manuals) for
blending
aggregate
gradations,
http://www.iowbut
it is not
adot.gov/Const
required.
ruction_Materi
Links:
als/pcc.htmlPCC
Level III
download file
Technician
Aggregate Mix
Course Manual No
Design (QMC)
(see Appendix
E),
http://www.dot.
il.gov/materials
/pcclevel3.pdf
Blending
KU_MIX
Aggregates No
spreadsheet,
http://www.dot.
il.gov/materials
/Blending
%20Aggregate
No s(V2.2).xls No

The
contractors
may use their
For gradations
own
- we use the
Yes spreadsheet.
terminology No
The -
(JMF)
Department
http://www.dot.
has a
state.mn.us/m
spreadsheet
aterials/concre
which can be
tedocs/Concret
used to check
e_Aggregate_
No the Yes (Please explain) Expanded clay or shale
Worksheet_20
contractor's
14.xlsx We
optimization.
also require
We
this are
forminfor
the
process
mix design of
revising
submittals our-
No spreadsheet. No
http://www.dot.
state.mn.us/m
aterials/concre
tedocs/Contrac
tor_JMF_Mix_
Design_Submi
Yes ttal.xls No
Manufactured sand is
allowed for use in
concrete shoulders.
Have a couple of
experiemental sections
where manufactured
sand was utilized in
mainline paving. Still
evaluating field
No Yes (Please explain) performance.

http://www.mdt
.mt.gov/other/
materials/exter
nal/materials_
manual/215.P
No DF No

It depends on what you


mean by manufactured
materials. We allow
manufactured sand; ie.,
sand size chrushed
No aggregate.

No No

Refer to :
http://www.tran
sportation.nebr
aska.gov/mat-
n-tests/ Go to
the PCC Link,
Spreadsheet-
Mix Design
Submittal No
No No

http://www.pcc
mix.com/
COMPASS ACBFS- Iron slag
No Software Yes (Please explain) Recycled PCC

No No

No No

Recycled Crushed
No Yes (Please explain) Concrete

Not a specific
spreadsheet
required. Just
sheets
developed in-
house and/or
by the
Yes contractor. No

No No
No No
What types of coarse aggregates are used for GENERAL CONCRETE in your state? Please check all tha

Other
Dolostone Carbonates
Granite Quartzite Gneiss Limestone (Dolomite) (please Specify)

Dolostone
Granite Quartzite Limestone (Dolomite)

Granite Quartzite Limestone

Granite

Granite Limestone

Other
Dolostone Carbonates
Granite Quartzite Gneiss Limestone (Dolomite) (please Specify)
Dolostone
Quartzite Limestone (Dolomite)

Quartzite

Dolostone
Limestone (Dolomite)

Dolostone
Granite Quartzite Limestone (Dolomite)

Dolostone
Limestone (Dolomite)

Dolostone
Limestone (Dolomite)

Dolostone
Granite Quartzite Gneiss Limestone (Dolomite)
Dolostone
Limestone (Dolomite)

Granite Gneiss Limestone

Dolostone
Granite Quartzite Limestone (Dolomite)
Limestone

Dolostone
Limestone (Dolomite)

Dolostone
Granite Limestone (Dolomite)

Granite Quartzite Limestone

Other
Dolostone Carbonates
Granite Quartzite Gneiss Limestone (Dolomite) (please Specify)

Quartzite Limestone
Dolostone
Granite Quartzite Limestone (Dolomite)
? Please check all that apply.

Basalt "Trap Glacial/River


rock" Siltstone Rhyolite Gabbro Gravel Sandstone

Glacial/River
Gravel Sandstone

Basalt "Trap Glacial/River


rock" Gravel

Glacial/River
Gravel

Glacial/River
Gravel

Basalt "Trap
rock" Gabbro
Glacial/River
Gravel

Basalt "Trap Glacial/River


rock" Rhyolite Gravel

Glacial/River
Gravel

Basalt "Trap Glacial/River


rock" Rhyolite Gravel Sandstone

Glacial/River
Gravel Sandstone

Basalt "Trap Glacial/River


rock" Gravel

Basalt "Trap Glacial/River


rock" Siltstone Rhyolite Gabbro Gravel Sandstone
Glacial/River
Gravel

Glacial/River
Gravel

Glacial/River
Gravel

Glacial/River
Gravel
Basalt "Trap
rock"

Glacial/River
Gravel

Glacial/River
Rhyolite Gravel Sandstone

Glacial/River
Gravel

Siltstone Rhyolite Sandstone

Basalt "Trap Glacial/River


rock" Gravel
Basalt "Trap Glacial/River
rock" Gravel
What types of coarse aggregates are used for CONCRETE PAVEMENTS

Other Rock types Other (please


(please specify) specify) Granite Quartzite Gneiss

Granite Quartzite

Granite Quartzite

Granite

Siliceous Marble
Amphibolite
Other Rock types Metavolcanics
(please specify) Metawacke Granite Gneiss
Quartzite

Quartzite

Chat from Lead


Zinc mines has
also been used. Granite Quartzite

Major groups:
Limestone,
Dolomite, Basalt,
Here is a link to
Glacial Gravel.
our coarse
All others are
aggregate
components
specification of
sand and
3137 - gravel.
http://www.dot.st
ate.mn.us/pre-
letting/spec/2014/
chapters/3101%2
0through
%203166.pdf Granite Quartzite Gneiss
Granite Gneiss

Other Rock types


(please specify) River Gravel Granite Quartzite
Other Rock types Metamorphic
(please specify) Andesite

Granite

Granite Quartzite

Granite Quartzite Gneiss

Quartzite
ONCRETE PAVEMENTS in your state? Please check all that apply.

Other Carbonates
Limestone Dolostone (Dolomite) (please Specify) Basalt "Trap rock"

Basalt "Trap rock"

Limestone

Other Carbonates
Limestone Dolostone (Dolomite) (please Specify) Basalt "Trap rock"
Limestone Dolostone (Dolomite)

Basalt "Trap rock"

Limestone Dolostone (Dolomite)

Limestone Dolostone (Dolomite) Basalt "Trap rock"

Limestone Dolostone (Dolomite)

Limestone Dolostone (Dolomite) Basalt "Trap rock"

Limestone Dolostone (Dolomite) Basalt "Trap rock"


Limestone Dolostone (Dolomite)

Limestone

Limestone Dolostone (Dolomite)


Limestone Dolostone (Dolomite)

Limestone Dolostone (Dolomite)

Limestone

Other Carbonates
Limestone Dolostone (Dolomite) (please Specify)

Limestone

Basalt "Trap rock"


Limestone Dolostone (Dolomite)
Siltstone Rhyolite Gabbro Glacial/River Gravel

Glacial/River Gravel

Glacial/River Gravel

Glacial/River Gravel
Glacial/River Gravel

Rhyolite Glacial/River Gravel

Glacial/River Gravel

Rhyolite Glacial/River Gravel

Glacial/River Gravel

Glacial/River Gravel

Siltstone Rhyolite Gabbro Glacial/River Gravel


Rhyolite Glacial/River Gravel

Glacial/River Gravel

Glacial/River Gravel

Glacial/River Gravel
Glacial/River Gravel

Rhyolite Glacial/River Gravel

Siltstone Rhyolite

Glacial/River Gravel
What types of coarse aggregates are used for

Other Rock types Gravel for mainline


Sandstone (please specify) Other (please
pavement mustspecify)
have a Granite Quartzite Gneiss
SG>2.550. Limestone
may be used in
shoulder pavement, in
addition to the
aggregates allowed
Sandstone for mainline Granite Quartzite

Granite Quartzite

Granite

Other Rock types Siliceous Marble


(please specify) Metavolcanics Granite Gneiss
Quartzite

Quartzite

Chat from Lead Zinc


mines has also been
Sandstone used. Granite Quartzite

Sandstone
Major groups:
Limestone, Dolomite,
Basalt, Glacial Gravel.
All others are
components of sand
and gravel.%
Maximum
Absorption of
Limestone aggregates
of 1.75% and
Maximum %
Carbonate for Natural
Sandstone Gravel of 30.0% Granite Quartzite Gneiss
Gneiss

Granite Gneiss

Other Rock types


(please specify) River Gravel Granite Quartzite
See above

Sandstone Granite

Continuous
Reinforced Concrete Granite Quartzite
Pavements have a
CoTE specifciation
limit of 5.5 micrstrain/F
or less for the
concrete, so this may
limit the use of certain
aggregate types in
Sandstone these pavements. Granite Quartzite Gneiss

Quartzite
In areas where
limestone is not
readily available,
glacial/gravel may be
used. This is accepted
Other Rock types on a project-by-project
(please specify) basis.
e aggregates are used for BRIDGE CONCRETE in your state? Please check all that apply.

Other
Carbonate
Dolostone s (please Basalt Glacial/Riv
Limestone (Dolomite) Specify) "Trap rock" Siltstone Rhyolite Gabbro er Gravel Sandstone

Dolostone Glacial/Riv
Limestone (Dolomite) er Gravel Sandstone

Basalt Glacial/Riv
"Trap rock" er Gravel

Glacial/Riv
er Gravel

Limestone

Other
Carbonate
Dolostone s (please Basalt
Limestone (Dolomite) Specify) "Trap rock"
Dolostone Glacial/Riv
Limestone (Dolomite) er Gravel

Basalt Glacial/Riv
"Trap rock" Rhyolite er Gravel

Dolostone Glacial/Riv
Limestone (Dolomite) er Gravel

Dolostone Basalt Glacial/Riv


Limestone (Dolomite) "Trap rock" Rhyolite er Gravel Sandstone

Dolostone Glacial/Riv
Limestone (Dolomite) er Gravel Sandstone

Dolostone Basalt Glacial/Riv


Limestone (Dolomite) "Trap rock" er Gravel

Dolostone Basalt Glacial/Riv


Limestone (Dolomite) "Trap rock" Siltstone Rhyolite Gabbro er Gravel Sandstone
Glacial/Riv
Limestone er Gravel

Glacial/Riv
er Gravel

Glacial/Riv
Limestone er Gravel

Glacial/Riv
er Gravel

Dolostone
Limestone (Dolomite)
Dolostone Glacial/Riv
Limestone (Dolomite) er Gravel

Dolostone Glacial/Riv
Limestone (Dolomite) Rhyolite er Gravel Sandstone

Limestone

Other
Carbonate
Dolostone s (please
Limestone (Dolomite) Specify) Siltstone Rhyolite Sandstone

Limestone

Basalt Glacial/Riv
"Trap rock" er Gravel
Dolostone
Limestone (Dolomite)
Within your Glacial /River Gravel what is the maximum % of the following (potentially
allow?

Other Rock
types Other
(please (please
specify) specify) Chert Slate Schist Carbonate Pyrite Argillite

Gravel
must have
a
SG>2.550

Per M80 Per M80 Per M80 Per M80 Per M80 Per M80

< 2.40 SG,


3.00%

Siliceous
Marble
Metawacke
3%

3 1

4.0%

Maximum
Chat from
%
Lead Zinc
Absorption
mines has
of
also been
Limestone
used.
aggregates
of 1.75%
Major
and
groups:
Maximum
Limestone,
%
Dolomite,
Carbonate
Basalt,
for Natural
Glacial
Gravel of
Gravel.
30.0% All
others
Maximum are
component
%
sAbsorption
of sand
and gravel. 2.5%
of
Limestone
aggregates
of 1.10%
for Bridge
Decks and
Rails 3
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
See above

1.0
(deleterious
chert)

3 3 0 0 0 0
2% - 5%
Within your Glacial /River
Gravel, does the allowable %
% of the following (potentially) deleterious rock types do you deleterious vary depending
upon the use of the concrete?

Other
please Other (please
Phyllite Iron Oxide Shale Sandstone specify Response specify)

2% No

N/A

Per M80 Per M80 Per M80 Per M80 No

Yes
Unsound chert 3%
Coal & nonstructural, 2%
1% lignite -1 %, Yes structural
opal 0.5%,
Volcanic
glass 3%,
Microcrystal
ine quartz
1 5 5% No

1.0% No

Coal 0.5%,
Clay 1.0%,
Minus #200
0.5% 2.0% No

Our gravels
are Max 4.0%
predominat sandstone in
ely chert. quartzite, gneiss,
Max. sum. . No granite sources
of soft
Sum of total Shale 0.4% on
particles
spall 1/2" sieve, 0.7%
2.0%;
includes retained on No. 4
including
soft sieve, For bridge,
Chert =
particles, shale 0.3% on
4.0%balls
clay No 1/2" sieve and
and lumps 0.5% on No. 4
% retained sieve Clay Balls
on No. 4 and Lumps 0.3%
sieve 3.5% Total Spall 1.0% -
general, 1/2" sieve and
0.3 0.4 4 3.0% bridge Yes 1.5% - No. 4 sieve
No
specificatio
n/a n/a n/a n/a n, but No
certain
types may
be self-
llimiting
5% due
to
maximumto
failure
meet
by weight of
quality
soft
specificatio
fragments No
ns (LA
abrasion,
SS
Soundness,
ASR
testing,
Deleterious
substances
) No

4.0% 0.7% No

River
Gravel-Clay
Lumps
0.5% and a
Sand
Equivalent
not less
than 90 No
Standard concrete
deleterious
requirements are
less restrictive
than our
2.0 sulfur superstructure
max (for concrete
ACBFS) Yes requirements.

The Combined
0 0 3 0 0 No maximum amount
of all the
deleterious
materials shall not
exceed 2.0 or 3.0
depending of type
2 1 2 Yes of construction.

1% No
2% chert (percent
by weight) for
prestressed
members and 5%
chert for other
1% Yes applications.
What is your specification for cleanli
passing the #200 sieve)? Is it based
composite of all coarse aggregate, o
Do you require washing the fine aggregate and/or coarse aggregate? Please specify your spe
aggregate? below.

Yes - Fine Yes - Coarse No - Fine No - Coarse Other (please Each Individual
Aggregate Aggregate Aggregate Aggregate specify) Fraction

Coarse
Fine Aggregate Aggregate

Coarse
Fine Aggregate Aggregate

Coarse Each Individual


Fine Aggregate Aggregate Fraction

Coarse
Aggregate Fine Aggregate

Coarse
Fine Aggregate Aggregate
Coarse Each Individual
Fine Aggregate Aggregate Fraction

We don't
require
Coarse washing but
Aggregate Fine Aggregate most of the fine
aggregates
come from
rivers and the
maximum
percent minus
Coarse 200 is 2.0% for Each Individual
Fine Aggregate Aggregate both the coarse Fraction
and the fine so
it is very hard
to meet those
requirements
Coarse without Each Individual
Fine Aggregate Aggregate washing. Fraction

Coarse
Fine Aggregate Aggregate

Coarse Each Individual


Fine Aggregate Aggregate Fraction
We do not
require
quartzite,
gneiss, granite,
Coarse trap rock to be Each Individual
Fine Aggregate Aggregate washed. Fraction
Gravel is
required to be
Coarse washed prior to Each Individual
Fine Aggregate Aggregate use. Fraction

Coarse
Fine Aggregate Aggregate

Not if it meets
gradation
specifications
Coarse without Each Individual
Fine Aggregate Aggregate washing Fraction

Each Individual
Fine Aggregate Fine Aggregate Fraction

Coarse Each Individual


Fine Aggregate Aggregate Fraction
We have a
cleanness
specification
that will require
the washing of
Coarse aggregate to Each Individual
Fine Aggregate Aggregate pass. Fraction

Coarse
Fine Aggregate Aggregate

Coarse Each Individual


Fine Aggregate Aggregate Fraction

Coarse
Fine Aggregate Aggregate

Coarse
Fine Aggregate Aggregate

Each Individual
Fraction

Coarse
Aggregate Fine Aggregate
If aggregate is
produced that
Coarse conforms to
Fine Aggregate Aggregate requirements.
your specification for cleanliness of the coarse aggregate (%
the #200 sieve)? Is it based on each individual fraction, a
ite of all coarse aggregate, or a composite of all coarse and fine
ate? Please specify your specification limit in the "Other" section What types of Materials Related Distresses (MRD
Please check all that apply.

Composite of All
Composite of All Coarse and Fine Other (please Alkali-silica Alkali-carbonate
Coarse Aggregate Aggregate specify) reactivity (ASR) reactivity (ACR)

1% for bridge &


pavement concrete,
Composite of All 2% for general Alkali-silica
Coarse Aggregate concrete. reactivity (ASR)

Composite of All Alkali-silica


Coarse Aggregate reactivity (ASR)

For coarse Alkali-silica


aggregate grades reactivity (ASR)
the maximum
passing the 200
sieve is 2.5%, when
the LA abration is
Composite of All less than or equal to
Coarse Aggregate 30.

Composite of All Alkali-silica


Coarse Aggregate reactivity (ASR)
Individual for
standard concrete
Composite for paving
Composite of All and bridge deck with
Coarse and Fine combined grading
Aggregate requirements

Alkali-silica
reactivity (ASR)
If the fines are clay,
then the limit is
1.0%; while if the
fines are from
crushing, then the Alkali-silica
limit is 2.5%. reactivity (ASR)
Coarse Max = 2.0%
Intermediate Max =
2.0% Fine Max =
2.0% So by default
the composite is also Alkali-silica
2.0% reactivity (ASR)

Maximum allowable
Composite of All Loss by Washing
Coarse and Fine depends on the Alkali-carbonate
Aggregate aggregate Class. reactivity (ACR)
Maximum Loss by
Washing for
optimized aggregate
blend is based on
combined aggregate
gradation.
For granite,
quartzite, gneiss,
limestone, carbonate
aggregates - 1.5%
on each fraction For
gravel - 1.0% on Alkali-silica
each fraction reactivity (ASR)
Composite of All
Coarse and Fine No. 200 0-3 %
Aggregate passing

Alkali-silica
reactivity (ASR)

Standard Mix
Coarse < 1.0% Fine
< 3 Well Graded Alkali-silica
Composite < 3.0 reactivity (ASR)

Composite of All Alkali-silica


Coarse Aggregate In all cases it is 3% reactivity (ASR)
Alkali-silica
reactivity (ASR)

Composite of All More restrictive if


Coarse and Fine fines are from natural Alkali-silica Alkali-carbonate
Aggregate sand and gravel. reactivity (ASR) reactivity (ACR)

All Concrete coarse


agg.: 1.5%
Limestone agg used
for paving concrete:
can increase up to
5% if material
passing No. 200 is
Composite of All determied to be at
Coarse and Fine least 85% dust of Alkali-silica Alkali-carbonate
Aggregate 1.5%
fracture. Limestone reactivity (ASR) reactivity (ACR)
agg used for
structural
applications: can
increase up to 3% if
material passing No.
200 is determied to
Composite of All be at least 85% dust Alkali-silica
Coarse Aggregate of fracture. reactivity (ASR)

Alkali-silica
reactivity (ASR)

Composite of All Alkali-silica


Coarse Aggregate reactivity (ASR)
A composite sample
consisting of 50% of
No. 1 and 50% of
No. 2 stone or actual
Composite of All percentage included
Coarse Aggregate in the work.
erials Related Distresses (MRD) does your DOT experience?
hat apply. What types of tests do you perform to screen fo

AASHTO PP65-10,
ASR in Alabama Determining the
has been limited Reactivity of Concrete
to less than 5 Aggregates adn
total Selecting Appropriate
occurrences. Measures for Preventing
We have to Deleterious Expansion in
Other
watch for issues New Concrete
(please
D-Cracking Sulfate Attack Other specify)
with Construction
sulfate/chloride
attack in the
coastal areas of
the state, but
issues have
been minimal.

D-Cracking Sulfate Attack

Sulfate Attack

Sulfate Attack

Sulfate Attack
We control the
ASR with
aggregate
selection with a
99.9% success
rate. Do not use
the hotter
sources. SCM's
Sulfate Attack are also allowed
to control the
ASR. We try to
control the D-
Cracking with
aggregate
selection, but
D-Cracking have been only
30 to 70%
successful. We
have been told
we have ACR, AASHTO PP65-10,
but don't believe Determining the
D-Cracking it. Reactivity of Concrete
Aggregates adn
Selecting Appropriate
Measures for Preventing
Deleterious Expansion in
New Concrete
Construction

D-Cracking
D-Cracking

Sulfate Attack

ASR in a few
D-Cracking cases, but rare

D-Cracking

AASHTO PP65-10,
Determining the
Reactivity of Concrete
Aggregates adn
Selecting Appropriate
Measures for Preventing
Deleterious Expansion in
New Concrete
Construction
D-Cracking

D-Cracking Sulfate Attack

D-Cracking was
a problem in the
past, but we
have stopped
Sulfate Attack the problem.

D-Cracking Sulfate Attack

Minimal
occurrence.
Controlled
through addition
of Class F fly
ash at minimum
20% in mix
designs.
of tests do you perform to screen for potential aggregate durability or reactivity issues? If procedures are modified a

AASTHO T96/ASTM C
131, Standard Test
Method for Resistance to AASHTO T303,
Degradation of Small- AASHTO T104, Accelerated Detection of ASTM C289, Standard
Size Coarse Aggregate Soundness of Aggregate Potentially Deleterious Test Method for
by Abrasion and Impact by Use of Sodium Expansion of Mortar Potential Alkali-Silica
in the Los T96/ASTM
AASTHO Angeles C Sulfate or Magnesium Bars Due to Alkali-Silica Reactivity of Aggregates
Machine
131, Standard Test Sulfate Reaction (Chemical Method)
Method for Resistance to
Degradation of Small- AASHTO T104,
Size Coarse Aggregate Soundness of Aggregate
by Abrasion and Impact by Use of Sodium
in the Los T96/ASTM
AASTHO Angeles C Sulfate or Magnesium
Machine
131, Standard Test Sulfate
Method for Resistance to
Degradation of Small- AASHTO T104,
Size Coarse Aggregate Soundness of Aggregate
by Abrasion and Impact by Use of Sodium
in the Los Angeles Sulfate or Magnesium
Machine Sulfate

AASTHO T96/ASTM C
131, Standard Test
Method for Resistance to
Degradation of Small- AASHTO T104,
Size Coarse Aggregate Soundness of Aggregate
by Abrasion and Impact by Use of Sodium
in the Los T96/ASTM
AASTHO Angeles C Sulfate or Magnesium
Machine
131, Standard Test Sulfate
Method for Resistance to AASHTO T303,
Degradation of Small- AASHTO T104, Accelerated Detection of
Size Coarse Aggregate Soundness of Aggregate Potentially Deleterious
by Abrasion and Impact by Use of Sodium Expansion of Mortar
in the Los Angeles Sulfate or Magnesium Bars Due to Alkali-Silica
Machine Sulfate Reaction
AASTHO T96/ASTM C
131, Standard Test
Method for Resistance to
Degradation of Small-
Size Coarse Aggregate
by Abrasion and Impact
in the Los Angeles
Machine
AASHTO T303,
Accelerated Detection of
Potentially Deleterious
Expansion of Mortar
AASTHO T96/ASTM C Bars Due to Alkali-Silica
131, Standard Test Reaction
Method for Resistance to
Degradation of Small- AASHTO T104,
Size Coarse Aggregate Soundness of Aggregate
by Abrasion and Impact by Use of Sodium
in the Los T96/ASTM
AASTHO Angeles C Sulfate or Magnesium
Machine
131, Standard Test Sulfate
Method for Resistance to
Degradation of Small-
Size Coarse Aggregate
by Abrasion and Impact
in the Los Angeles
Machine

ASTM C289, Standard


Test Method for
Potential Alkali-Silica
AASTHO T96/ASTM C Reactivity of Aggregates
131, Standard Test (Chemical Method)
Method for Resistance to
Degradation of Small-
Size Coarse Aggregate
by Abrasion and Impact
in the Los T96/ASTM
AASTHO Angeles C
Machine
131, Standard Test
Method for Resistance to
Degradation of Small- AASHTO T104,
Size Coarse Aggregate Soundness of Aggregate
by Abrasion and Impact by Use of Sodium
in the Los Angeles Sulfate or Magnesium
Machine Sulfate
AASTHO T96/ASTM C
131, Standard Test
Method for Resistance to
Degradation of Small- AASHTO T104,
Size Coarse Aggregate Soundness of Aggregate
by Abrasion and Impact by Use of Sodium
in the Los Angeles Sulfate or Magnesium
Machine Sulfate
AASTHO T96/ASTM C
131, Standard Test
Method for Resistance to
Degradation of Small- AASHTO T104,
Size Coarse Aggregate Soundness of Aggregate
by Abrasion and Impact by Use of Sodium
in the Los Angeles Sulfate or Magnesium
Machine Sulfate
AASTHO T96/ASTM C
131, Standard Test
Method for Resistance to AASHTO T303,
Degradation of Small- AASHTO T104, Accelerated Detection of
Size Coarse Aggregate Soundness of Aggregate Potentially Deleterious
by Abrasion and Impact by Use of Sodium Expansion of Mortar
in the Los T96/ASTM
AASTHO Angeles C Sulfate or Magnesium Bars Due to Alkali-Silica
Machine
131, Standard Test Sulfate Reaction
Method for Resistance to AASHTO T303,
Degradation of Small- AASHTO T104, Accelerated Detection of
Size Coarse Aggregate Soundness of Aggregate Potentially Deleterious
by Abrasion and Impact by Use of Sodium Expansion of Mortar
in the Los Angeles Sulfate or Magnesium Bars Due to Alkali-Silica
Machine Sulfate Reaction

AASTHO T96/ASTM C
131, Standard Test
Method for Resistance to
Degradation of Small- AASHTO T104,
Size Coarse Aggregate Soundness of Aggregate
by Abrasion and Impact by Use of Sodium
in the Los Angeles Sulfate or Magnesium
Machine Sulfate
AASTHO T96/ASTM C
131, Standard Test
Method for Resistance to AASHTO T303,
Degradation of Small- AASHTO T104, Accelerated Detection of
Size Coarse Aggregate Soundness of Aggregate Potentially Deleterious
by Abrasion and Impact by Use of Sodium Expansion of Mortar
in the Los Angeles Sulfate or Magnesium Bars Due to Alkali-Silica
Machine
AASTHO T96/ASTM C Sulfate Reaction
131, Standard Test
Method for Resistance to
Degradation of Small- AASHTO T104,
Size Coarse Aggregate Soundness of Aggregate
by Abrasion and Impact by Use of Sodium
in the Los T96/ASTM
AASTHO Angeles C Sulfate or Magnesium
Machine
131, Standard Test Sulfate
Method for Resistance to
Degradation of Small-
Size Coarse Aggregate
by Abrasion and Impact
in the Los T96/ASTM
AASTHO Angeles C
Machine
131, Standard Test
Method for Resistance to
Degradation of Small- AASHTO T104,
Size Coarse Aggregate Soundness of Aggregate
by Abrasion and Impact by Use of Sodium
in the Los Angeles Sulfate or Magnesium
Machine Sulfate

AASTHO T96/ASTM C
131, Standard Test
Method for Resistance to AASHTO T303,
Degradation of Small- AASHTO T104, Accelerated Detection of
Size Coarse Aggregate Soundness of Aggregate Potentially Deleterious
by Abrasion and Impact by Use of Sodium Expansion of Mortar
in the Los T96/ASTM
AASTHO Angeles C Sulfate or Magnesium Bars Due to Alkali-Silica
Machine
131, Standard Test Sulfate Reaction
Method for Resistance to AASHTO T303,
Degradation of Small- Accelerated Detection of
Size Coarse Aggregate Potentially Deleterious
by Abrasion and Impact Expansion of Mortar
in the Los Angeles Bars Due to Alkali-Silica
Machine Reaction
AASTHO T96/ASTM C
131, Standard Test
Method for Resistance to
Degradation of Small- AASHTO T104,
Size Coarse Aggregate Soundness of Aggregate
by Abrasion and Impact by Use of Sodium
in the Los Angeles Sulfate or Magnesium
Machine Sulfate
If procedures are modified as compared to standard procedure, can you include a link your DOT Procedure. Please

ASTM C441, Test


Method for Effectiveness
of Pozzolans or Ground ASTM C586, Test
Blast Furnace Slag in Method for Potential
ASTM C295, Guide for Preventing Excessive Alkali Reactivity of ASTM C666, Procedure
Petrographic Expansion of Concrete Carbonate Rocks as A, Test Method for
Examination of Due to Alkali Silica Concrete Aggregates Resistance of Concrete
Aggregates for Concrete Reactivity (Rock-Cylinder Method) to Freezing and Thawing

ASTM C441, Test


Method for Effectiveness
of Pozzolans or Ground
Blast Furnace Slag in
Preventing Excessive
Expansion of Concrete
Due to Alkali Silica
Reactivity

ASTM C295, Guide for


Petrographic
Examination of
Aggregates for Concrete
ASTM C666, Procedure
A, Test Method for
Resistance of Concrete
to Freezing and Thawing

ASTM C295, Guide for


Petrographic
Examination of
Aggregates for Concrete

ASTM C441, Test


Method for Effectiveness
of Pozzolans or Ground
Blast Furnace Slag in
Preventing Excessive
Expansion of Concrete
Due to Alkali Silica
Reactivity

ASTM C295, Guide for


Petrographic
Examination of
Aggregates for Concrete

ASTM C666, Procedure


A, Test Method for
Resistance of Concrete
to Freezing and Thawing
ASTM C666, Procedure
A, Test Method for
Resistance of Concrete
to Freezing and Thawing
ASTM C666, Procedure
A, Test Method for
Resistance of Concrete
to Freezing and Thawing
our DOT Procedure. Please check all that apply.

ASTM C1012, Standard


Test Method for Length ASTM C1105, Test
ASTM C666, Procedure ASTM C666, Procedure Change of Hydraulic- Method for Length
B, Test Method for C, Test Method for Cement Mortars Change of Concrete Due
Resistance of Concrete Resistance of Concrete Exposed to a Sulfate to Alkali-Carbonate Rock
to Freezing and Thawing to Freezing and Thawing Solution Reaction

ASTM C1012, Standard


Test Method for Length
Change of Hydraulic-
Cement Mortars
Exposed to a Sulfate
Solution
ASTM C1012, Standard
Test Method for Length
Change of Hydraulic-
Cement Mortars
Exposed to a Sulfate
Solution
ASTM C1012, Standard
Test Method for Length
Change of Hydraulic-
Cement Mortars
Exposed to a Sulfate
Solution

ASTM C666, Procedure


B, Test Method for
Resistance of Concrete
to Freezing and Thawing

ASTM C666, Procedure


B, Test Method for
Resistance of Concrete
to Freezing and Thawing

ASTM C666, Procedure


B, Test Method for
Resistance of Concrete
to Freezing and Thawing
ASTM C666, Procedure
B, Test Method for
Resistance of Concrete
to Freezing and Thawing
ASTM C666, Procedure
B, Test Method for
Resistance of Concrete
to Freezing and Thawing

ASTM C1012, Standard


Test Method for Length
Change of Hydraulic-
Cement Mortars
Exposed to a Sulfate
Solution
ASTM C1567, Test
Method for Determining
the Potential Alkali-Silica
Reactivity of
ASTM C1293, Test Combinations of
ASTM C1260, Test Method for Cementitious Materials
Method for Potential Determination of Length and Aggregate
Reactivity of Aggregates Change of Concrete Due (Accelerated Mortar-Bar
(Mortar-Bar Method) to Alkali-Silica Reaction Method) Hydraulic Fracture

ASTM C1567, Test


Method for Determining
the Potential Alkali-Silica
Reactivity of
ASTM C1293, Test Combinations of
ASTM C1260, Test Method for Cementitious Materials
Method for Potential Determination of Length and
ASTMAggregate
C1567, Test
Reactivity of Aggregates Change of Concrete Due (Accelerated
Method Mortar-Bar
for Determining
(Mortar-Bar Method) to Alkali-Silica Reaction Method)
the Potential Alkali-Silica
Reactivity of
ASTM C1293, Test Combinations of
ASTM C1260, Test Method for Cementitious Materials
Method for Potential Determination of Length and Aggregate
Reactivity of Aggregates Change of Concrete Due (Accelerated Mortar-Bar
(Mortar-Bar Method) to Alkali-Silica Reaction Method)

ASTM C1567, Test


Method for Determining
the Potential Alkali-Silica
Reactivity of
Combinations of
ASTM C1260, Test Cementitious Materials
Method for Potential and Aggregate
Reactivity of Aggregates (Accelerated Mortar-Bar
(Mortar-Bar Method) Method)
ASTM C1567, Test
Method for Determining
the Potential Alkali-Silica
Reactivity of
ASTM C1293, Test Combinations of
Method for Cementitious Materials
Determination of Length and Aggregate
ASTM C1567, Test
Change of Concrete Due (Accelerated Mortar-Bar
Method for Determining
to Alkali-Silica Reaction Method)
the Potential Alkali-Silica
Reactivity of
ASTM C1293, Test Combinations of
ASTM C1260, Test Method for Cementitious Materials
Method for Potential Determination of Length and
ASTMAggregate
C1567, Test
Reactivity of Aggregates Change of Concrete Due (Accelerated Mortar-Bar
Method for Determining
(Mortar-Bar Method) to Alkali-Silica Reaction Method)
the Potential Alkali-Silica
Reactivity of
Combinations of
ASTM C1260, Test Cementitious Materials
Method for Potential and Aggregate
Reactivity of Aggregates (Accelerated Mortar-Bar
(Mortar-Bar Method) Method)

ASTM C1567, Test


Method for Determining
the Potential Alkali-Silica
Reactivity of
ASTM C1293, Test Combinations of
ASTM C1260, Test Method for Cementitious Materials
Method for Potential Determination of Length and
ASTMAggregate
C1567, Test
Reactivity of Aggregates Change of Concrete Due (Accelerated Mortar-Bar
Method for Determining
(Mortar-Bar Method) to Alkali-Silica Reaction Method)
the Potential Alkali-Silica
Reactivity of
ASTM C1293, Test Combinations of
ASTM C1260, Test Method for Cementitious Materials
Method for Potential Determination of Length and Aggregate
Reactivity of Aggregates Change of Concrete Due (Accelerated Mortar-Bar
(Mortar-Bar Method) to Alkali-Silica Reaction Method)
ASTM C1260, Test
Method for Potential
Reactivity of Aggregates
(Mortar-Bar Method)

ASTM C1260, Test


Method for Potential
Reactivity of Aggregates
(Mortar-Bar Method)

ASTM C1567, Test


Method for Determining
the Potential Alkali-Silica
Reactivity of
ASTM C1293, Test Combinations of
ASTM C1260, Test Method for Cementitious Materials
Method for Potential Determination of Length and Aggregate
Reactivity of Aggregates Change of Concrete Due (Accelerated Mortar-Bar
(Mortar-Bar Method) to Alkali-Silica Reaction Method)
ASTM C1260, Test
Method for Potential
Reactivity of Aggregates
(Mortar-Bar Method) ASTM C1567, Test
Method for Determining
the Potential Alkali-Silica
Reactivity of
ASTM C1293, Test Combinations of
ASTM C1260, Test Method for Cementitious Materials
Method for Potential Determination of Length and Aggregate
Reactivity of Aggregates Change of Concrete Due (Accelerated Mortar-Bar
(Mortar-Bar Method) to Alkali-Silica Reaction Method)

ASTM C1567, Test


Method for Determining
the Potential Alkali-Silica
Reactivity of
Combinations of
ASTM C1260, Test Cementitious Materials
Method for Potential and
ASTMAggregate
C1567, Test
Reactivity of Aggregates (Accelerated Mortar-Bar
Method for Determining
(Mortar-Bar Method) Method)
the Potential Alkali-Silica
Reactivity of
ASTM C1293, Test Combinations of
ASTM C1260, Test Method for Cementitious Materials
Method for Potential Determination of Length and Aggregate
Reactivity of Aggregates Change of Concrete Due (Accelerated Mortar-Bar
(Mortar-Bar Method) to Alkali-Silica Reaction Method)
Do you have any
other comments,
questions, or
concerns?

Iowa Pore Index Other Other (please specify) Open-Ended Response

NO

Other AASHTO T-210


Durability is based on
various chemical testing
(XRF and XRD)
combined with pore
index value to give an
Iowa Pore Index Other overall quality number.

Most of the above tests


are either "Illinois
Modified" or "Illinois Test
Procedures" that are
based on the reference
standard. (Links are not
available at this time.)

Modified version of
AASHTO T-103 Freeze
Other Thaw of Aggregates

We now follow AASHTO


65-10 exclusively for our
carbonate rock sources.

ASTM C666 with the


following Michigan Test
Methods; MTM's 113,
Iowa Pore Index 114, 115.does a
MnDOT
lithographical
examination each month
-
http://www.dot.state.mn.
us/materials/manuals/lab
Other oratory/1209.pdf
MoDOT also performs
the following tests: -
Bulk and Apparent
Specific Gravity
(AASHTO T 85) -
Absorption (AASHTO T
85) - Micro Deval
(AASHTO T 327) -
Deleterious Content How do state DOT's
(MoDOT Test Method ensure quality
TM-71) aggregates are being
http://epg.modot.mo.gov/ utilized in the concrete
index.php? mix. Do state DOT's
title=106.3.2.71_TM- monitor quarry ledges
71%2C_Deleterious_Co being used for state
Other ntent_of_Aggregate work?

T303 & C1260 on a


limited basis

ASTM C 1567 is run until


28 days.
http://www.dot.state.oh.u
s/Divisions/Construction
Mgt/OnlineDocs/Pages/
ProposalNotesSuppleme
ntalSpecificationsandSu
pplements.aspx Above
link contains
modifications. See
Iowa Pore Index Supplement section.
AASHTO T 327,
Resistance of coarse
aggregate to
degradation by abrasion
in the Micro-Deval
Other Apparatus No
Note on how TxDOT
handles ASR reactivity.
TxDOT considers all
aggregates reactive and
every concrete mix
design must use one of
the 7 prescriptive
mitigation options
allowed or Option 8
which requires ASTM C
1260 and ASTM C 1567
testing to be performed.
Option 8 is a rarely used
option.

WSDOT Test Method T


113 Method of Test for
Determination of
Other Degradation Value
AASHTO T103 Freeze -
Other Thaw

You might also like