Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Incremental Earnings
= EBIT- Taxes
= EBIT – EBIT Tax Rate
= EBIT (1 – Tax Rate)
= (Incremental Revenues – Incremental Costs –
Depreciation) (1 – Tax Rate)
Forecasting Incremental Earnings
Introductory Example (continued)
Assume after we installed the machine, the additional
capacity will generate incremental revenues of
$500,000 per year for five years, but also incur
$150,000 incremental costs per year. Also assume five
year straight-line depreciation is used, marginal tax
rate of 40%. What are the incremental earnings from
year 0 to year 5 for the taking this update?
Forecasting Incremental Earnings
Solution
Depreciation=$1,020,000/5=$204,000
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5
Incremental Revenues 500 500 500 500 500
Incremental Costs -50 -150 -150 -150 -150 -150
Depreciation -204 -204 -204 -204 -204
EBIT -50 146 146 146 146 146
Income Taxes @ 40% 20 -58.4 -58.4 -58.4 -58.4 -58.4
Incremental Earnings -30 87.6 87.6 87.6 87.6 87.6
Forecasting Incremental Earnings
Note:
1. Pro Forma Statement: financials under a set of
hypothetical assumptions.
2. Taxes can be positive or negative. When
incremental EBIT<0, taxes>0, so it is tax savings.
3. We ignore the interest payment here, because by
assumption, the investment decision is independent
from financing decision . So when making capital
budgeting decisions, we treat net income as
unlevered net income.
Taxing Losses for Projects in Profitable
Companies
Problem:
Kellogg Company plans to launch a new line of high-
fiber, zero-trans-fat breakfast pastries. The heavy
advertising expenses associated with the new product
launch will generate operating losses of $10 million next
year for the product. Kellogg expects to earn pre-tax
income of $320 million from operations other than the
new pastries next year. If Kellogg pays a 40% tax rate on
its pre-tax income, what will it owe in taxes next year
without the new pastry product? What will it owe with
the new pastries?
Taxing Losses for Projects in Profitable
Companies
Solution:
Plan:
We need Kellogg’s pre-tax income with and without the new
product losses and its tax rate of 40%. We can then compute the
tax without the losses and compare it to the tax with the losses.
Without the new pastries, Kellogg will owe $320 million 40%
= $128 million in corporate taxes next year. With the new
pastries, Kellogg’s pre-tax income next year will be only $320
million - $10 million = $310 million, and it will owe $310 million
40% = $124 million in tax.
Determining Incremental Free CFs
So far, we have discussed incremental earnings forecast of
taking a project.
However, NPV rule is used to determine whether to take a
project or not. So we need one more step to calculate
incremental effect of the project on the firm’s available cash.
This is the project’s incremental free cash flow.
Determining Incremental Free CFs
Introductory Example (Continued)
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5
Incremental Revenues 500 500 500 500 500
Incremental Costs -50 -150 -150 -150 -150 -150
Depreciation -204 -204 -204 -204 -204
EBIT -50 146 146 146 146 146
Income Taxes @ 40% 20 -58.4 -58.4 -58.4 -58.4 -58.4
Incremental Earnings -30 87.6 87.6 87.6 87.6 87.6
Add Back Depreciation 204 204 204 204 204
Initial Capital Expenditure -1,020
Incremental Free CFs -1,050 291.6 291.6 291.6 291.6 291.6
Taxes
Taxes are critical financial decision making, every dollar
paid in taxes enriches the government instead of the
shareholders.
Corporate Taxes - Paid by the corporation out of profits
before shareholders are paid.
Personal Taxes - Paid by the individuals from earned
income and earnings from capital assets held as
investments.
System is progressive - Tax rate generally increases with
income.
Marginal Tax Rate - Tax Rate on next dollar of income.
Average Tax Rate - Taxes paid/Pretax income
Marginal vs. Average Corporate Tax
Rates
Taxable Income Marginal Tax Cumulative Average
Rates Tax Liability Rates
$0 - 50,000 15% $7,500 15.00%
50,001 - 75,000 25% 13,750 18.33%
75,001 - 100,000 34% 22,250 22.25%
100,001 - 335,000 39% 113,900 34.00%
335,001 - 10 mil 34% 3.4 mil 34.00%
10 mil - 15 mil 35% 5,150,000 34.33%
15 mil - 18.33 mil 38% 6,416,667 35.00%
18.33 mil + 35% N/A 35.00%
1 Year 0 1 2 3
Assume the discount rate is 10%, are you going to take this
upgrade?
Answer: NPV 1050 291.6 (1 1 5 ) 55.39 0
0.1 1.1
So yes, you should take this upgrade.
Only Incremental Cash Flows Matter
Definition of Incremental Cash Flow
CF with the Project – CF without the Project
Incremental Benefits
New product will increase sales of related accessories.
Project Interaction Example
Calculate the NPV of the Gillette New Razor Project
Should the Company Take On the Project?
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5
Depreciation Rate 20.00% 32.00% 19.20% 11.52% 11.52% 5.76%
Other Effects on Incremental Free CFs
Solution
• Depreciation schedule
Incremental Earning
= Annual Revenues – Variable Costs - Fixed Costs -Depr. =
0
Analyzing the Project
Example: 5-year project to produce printers:
• Revenue $100 per unit for a Printer .
• Variable Costs $70 per unit.
• Fixed Costs $300,000.
• $1,500,000 Investment, Straight-line Depr.
• Taxes 35%
Question: What is the accounting break-even
number of units to be sold?
Analyzing the Project
Revenues ($100/unit)
Expenses ($70/unit)
Actual Gross Profit ($30/unit)
Gross Profit Required
Fixed Costs - 300,000
Depreciation - 300,000
Pretax profit 0
Analyzing the Project
Solution:
Gross Profit Required
= Fixed Cost + Depreciation
= $300,000 + $1,500,000/5 = $600,000
= Actual Gross Profit
= $30/unit Number of Units
So break-even Units= $600,000/$30 = 20,000 units
Analyzing the Project
Note to Accounting Break Even
1. Accounting Break-Even results in cash flows equal
to depreciation.
2. Break-Even generates cash flows sufficient to
recover the initial investment over the life of the
project. ($300,000 x 5 = $1,500,000)
3. As a result, Accounting Break-Even always results
in a Negative NPV.
4. Investors will not be happy if the company simply
returns their original investment over time.
Analyzing the Project
Economic Break-Even Analysis
• Positive NPVs require that the PV of cash inflows exceed the PV of
the Investment Required.
• The objective is to find the level of a parameter that make the
incremental NPV equal to zero.
• Since earning is not zero any more, tax liability is not zero. Tax rate
MATTERs!
• To calculate, start with cash flows and go backward.
Analyzing the Project
Example (revisited): 5-year project to produce printers:
Revenue $100 per unit for a Printer
Variable Costs $70 per unit.
Fixed Costs $300,000
Initial Investment $1,500,000, straightly-line depr.
Taxes 35%
Required Return on Investment = 10%
Question: What is the economic break-even
number of units to be sold?
Analyzing the Project
Solution:
• The first step is to calculate the required cash flow each period to
equate NPV to 0.
• Note the CF0 is -$1,500,000, and cash flows from year 1 through
year 5 are the same.
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5
Cash Flows -1,500,000 CF CF CF CF CF
So
Abandonment Option
An abandonment option is the option to walk away.
Abandonment options can add value to a project because a
firm can drop a project if it turns out to be unsuccessful.
Common Real Options
Option to Expand
The option to expand, is the option to start with limited
production and expand only if a product is successful.
A company could, instead, test market the product in
limited release before committing fully to it. It is
possible that by reducing its upfront commitment, and
only choosing to expand if a product is successful, that an
increase the NPV of the product could result.