Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Great Debate On The Soviet Industria PDF
The Great Debate On The Soviet Industria PDF
because the peasantry and proletariat both played an active role while the revolution
of 1905 failed due to absence of a smychka. Bukharin describes Preobrazhensky’s
policies, devoid of smychka as ‘suicidal’, like walking ‘on the razor’s edge’. His
policies were called ‘adventurist’ and ‘impractical’ and would endanger financial
stability. (Dobb)
Bukharin reminded him that the relative increase in industrial prices had proved
burdensome and resulted in ‘scissor crisis.’ His critics argue that he had failed to
realize the importance of the latent sources however limited within the industries,
these were use of labour that was not working to its full capacity, rationalisation of
working methods of labourers and functioning of factories at more efficient level.
(Dobb)
At the 14th party congress, Stalin categorically supported Bukharin. But when
Bukharin advocated the ‘get rich’ slogan he compelled Bukharin to withdraw this
slogan.
Both the right wing and left wing were in favour of industrialisation but differed on the
certain aspects of the methods and strategies to be adopted to move forward. While
Bukharin favoured a gradual and steady paced process and development of
industries acceptable to the peasants Preobrazhensky on the other hand wanted fast
paced industrialisation and burdening the non-socialist sector with the taxes for the
same, Bukharin criticised this and wanted to adopt other methods that did not burden
the peasants. Both the wings had their own critiques and shortcoming.
At the 15th party congress, Stalin spoke of introducing collectivisation. His policies
were ultimately adopted. His policy was radically different from and more ambitious
and ruthless than those of Bukharin’s vision of soviet development. He ended NEP
and brushed the smychka aside in order to bring about headlong industrialisation,
which was the prerequisite for the establishment of socialism. Dobb argues that this
change in policies were the result of the changed situation. Schlesinger maintains
that he introduced collectivisation in 1929 when it was feasible, this increased
industrial output in 1926-28 and these development enabled the Stalin regime to
introduce speedy industrialisation. (Deutscher)
NEHA SHARMA
B.A. (H) HISTORY
SEMESTER III
The Great Debate | NEHA SHARMA
Bibliography
1) E.H. Carr: A History of Soviet Russia, 4 Volumes (1952)
2) Stephen F. Cohen: Bukharin and the Bolshevik Revolution: A Political Biography, 1888 – 1938
3) Isaac Deutscher: Stalin (1949)
4) Moshe Levin: The Making of the Soviet System
5) Alec Nove: An Economic History of the USSR
6) Karuna Kaushik: History of Communist Russia 1917-1991