Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Article 3 RPC (With Art 4) - 082920
Article 3 RPC (With Art 4) - 082920
Art. 3. Definition. — Acts and omissions punishable by law are felonies (delitos).
Felonies are committed not only by means of deceit (dolo) but also by means of fault
(culpa).
There is deceit when the act is performed with deliberate intent; and there is fault when
the wrongful act results from imprudence, negligence, lack of foresight, or lack of skill.
Law refers to the Revised Penal Code.
Deceit is a very poor translation of the Spanish word “dolo”; REPLACE IT WITH
MALICE
Elements of felonies
1. Act or omission
1. Act
1. Any physical movement tending to produce some effect, not necessarily successful
WHAT IS PUNISHED UNDER CRIMINAL LAW ARE OVERT ACTS- Something that
has an effect/shows causality
1. Freedom
2. Intelligence
3. intent
2. Omission
examples:
FORMULA ON FELONIES
FELONY Classification
Classification of felonies
1. Intentional (deceit)
The offender acts with malice in performing/omitting an act with the intent to cause
injury to person, property, or right of another
There are crimes which cannot be committed through imprudence or negligence such
as murder, treason, robbery, and malicious mischief.
2. Culpable (fault)
A person who causes an injury, without intention to cause an evil may be held liable
Regardless if the act is committed by means of dolo or culpa, the act is VOLUNTARY.
2. MAN IS A RATIONAL BEING. This has to be proven otherwise to fall under Art. 12
REQUISITES OF DOLO
1. Freedom — If the offender did not freely execute the act, he shall be exempt from criminal
liability (Art 12 par. 5 and 6) LACK OF FREEDOM IS NOT CRIMINALLY LIABLE.
3. Intent — being purely a mental process, this is presumed based on the proof of the
commission of an unlawful act. The existence of intent is shown by the overt acts of a
person.
CRIMINAL INTENT is presume from the commission of an unlawful act. But the
presumption of criminal intent does not arise from the proof of the commission of an act
which is not unlawful.
CRIMINAL LAW 1
Where the facts proven are accompanied by other facts which show that the
act complained of was not unlawful, the presumption of criminal intent
does not arise.
1. FREEDOM
2. INTELLIGENCE
NOTE:
MISTAKE OF FACT
General rule: when the accused performs an act which the rpc punishes, criminal intent is
presumed.
Xpn to xpn: when mistake of act is coupled with negligence or bad faith
Ignorance of the law excuses no one, but ignorance of fact RELIEVES criminal liability
(Ignorantia facti excusat).
MISTAKE OF FACT- is a misapprehension of fact on the part of the person who caused
injury to another.
“An honest mistake of fact destroys the presumption of criminal intent which
arises upon the commission of a felonious act.”
REQUISITES:
CRIMINAL LAW 1
1. The act would be lawful if the facts the offender had known were true.
2. Error in personae does not apply. Lack of intent to kill the deceased
because his intention was to kill another does not extinguish criminal
liability;
MAXIMS:
Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea, "the act itself does not make a man guilty
unless his intention were so."
Actus me invito factus non est meus actus, "an act done by me against my will is
not my act."
Application:
Mala in Prohibita - intentionally doing the act is sufficient for prosecution (THE ONES
PUNISHED BY SPECIAL LAWS)
Whent he doing of an act is prohibited by a special law, it is considered that the act is injurious to
public welfare and the doing of the prohibited act is the crime itself. GOOD FAITH AND
ABSENCE OF CRIMINAL INTENT IS NOT A VALID DEFENSE IN CRIMES
PUNISHED UNDER SPECIAL LAWS.
CRIMINAL LAW 1
INTENT VS MOTIVE
MOTIVE- THE MOVING POWER WHICH IMPELS ONE TO ACTION FOR A RESULT.
Motive is not an essential element of a crime, and, hence, need not be proved for
purposes of conviction.
4. Identification of accused is from unreliable source; testimony is inconclusive and not free
from doubt
6. (Direct assaults)when the person in authority or his agent who is attacked or seriously
intimidated is not in the actual performance of his official duty
1. IMMEDIATE (ART. 3)
ARTICLE 3. Definition. — Acts and omissions punishable by law are felonies (delitos).
Felonies are committed not only by means of deceit (dolo) but also by means of fault (culpa).
There is deceit when the act is performed with deliberate intent; and there is fault when the
wrongful act results from imprudence, negligence, lack of foresight, or lack of skill.
Criminal liability shall be incurred (1) By any person committing a felony (delito) although the
wrongful act done be different from that which he intended.
A person who intended and performed a felonious act (FIP), although change intervened (∆),
resulting act is different from what is intended (F®) = CRIMINAL LIABILITY
Elements:
2. Art 4 (B) Criminal liability shall be incurred by any person performing an act
which would be an offense against persons or property, were it not for the inherent
impossibility of its accomplishment or on account of the employment of inadequate
or ineffectual means.
4. CONSPIRACY (ART 8)
A conspiracy exists when two or more persons come to an agreement concerning the
commission of a felony and decide to commit it.
There is proposal when the person who has decided to commit a felony proposes its
execution to some other person or persons.
NOTE: You are liable only for what is covered in the plan/agreement