Professional Documents
Culture Documents
X Ray Scattering Basics Roessle
X Ray Scattering Basics Roessle
X-ray Scattering
Description of a plane electro-magnetic wave
Electromagnetic waves:
The electromagnetic waves that compose electromagnetic radiation can be imagined as a self-
propagating transverse oscillating wave of electric and magnetic fields. This diagram shows a plane
linearly polarized EMR wave propagating from left to right. The electric field is in a vertical plane and
the magnetic field in a horizontal plane. The two types of fields are always in phase with each other,
and no matter how powerful, have a ratio of electric to magnetic intensity which is fixed and never
varies.
Source: Wikipedia
X-ray scattering
X-ray scattering
Geometrical apporach
2
Scattering vector s (k k0 )
Scattering angle 2
X-ray scattering
Scattering from a single electron
i
2
k0 k r
Aj b j e
With bj is the scattering cross section, the rj describes the inner distance
vector and the vector k0 is the wave vektor of the incident wave.
X-ray scattering
Scattering from an ensemble
Within an particle, the scattering amplitudes of all atoms have to be summed up:
2
i k0 k r j
A k bj e
j
Or, using s (k k0 ) as scattering vector
2
i s rj
As b j e
X-ray scattering
Scattering intensity
AA I s b j bk e
* s r jk
j k
With the vector rjk as inner distance vector, pointing from the jth scatting center to
the kth scattering center.
The bj are the atomic scattering densities. They depend on the number of
electrons of the atom and the heavier an atom the higher is bj.
X-ray scattering
Atomic scattering factors
X-ray scattering
Electron density
As seen on the atomic scattering factors, the scattering density of the depends
not only on the number of electrons, but as well on the distribution of these
electrons around the atom.
b j j dV j
With the dVj as the volume element surrounding the scattering center.
The reconstitution of the electron density (r) and its distribution in the particle is
the aim of every X-ray scattering or diffraction experiment.
X-ray scattering
Electron density
This is not true for neutron scattering where the variation of the contrast is a very
powerfull technique.
X-ray scattering
Scattering from dilute samples
X-ray scattering
Scattering from dilute samples
In the ideal dilute solutions the scattering intensity from the entire sample
will be isotropic and proportional to the scattering from the single particle
averaged over all orientations .
s r jk sin srjk
Averaging of the term e lead to:
srjk
I s rj rk
sin srjk
j k srjk
X-ray scattering
Scattering from dilute samples
The vectors s and r are now reduced to their absolut value, which lead to a
significant loss of information in the SAXS pattern compared to e.g. crystallographic
data
2
I s pr
sin sr s s sin 2
dr
0
sr
Debye 1915
X-ray scattering
The scattering function I(s)
1.000 I(s) a.u.
0.100
0.010
0.001
0.000
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
s [nm-1]
X-ray scattering
Pair distance distribution function p(r)
sin sr
1 sin( sr)
I ( s) 4 pr dr p(r ) 2 s I ( s )
2
ds
sr 2 s 0 sr
r 0
X-ray scattering
Analysis of the scattering intensity
1.000
I(s) a.u.
0.100
I s pr
sin sr
0.010 dr
0
sr
0.001
0.000
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
s [nm-1]
X-ray scattering
Radius of gyration – Guinier plot
X-ray scattering
Radius of gyration – Guinier plot
The second moment of the distance distribution function p(r) is given by:
p(r ) r
2
dr
0
and the radius of gyration Rg can be introduced in analogy with classical mechanics:
2
p ( r ) r dr
1
Rg 2 0
2
pr dr
0
X-ray scattering
Radius of gyration – Guinier plot
Rg 2 2
I s I 0 e
s
3
Guinier and Fournet 1955
X-ray scattering
Radius of gyration – Guinier plot
Guinier-Approximation:
Rg 2 2
ln I s s ln I 0
3
Manfred Roessle EMBO Course 2012 © Fachhochschule Lübeck 2009
X-Ray scattering
X-ray scattering
Radius of gyration – Guinier plot
The Rg is historically the first structural parameter determined from the SAXS
data (Guinier and Fournet 1955), yielding direct information about the particle
size and shape.
X-ray scattering
Guinier approximation
Deviations from
the ideal protein
solution are easily
visible in the
Guinier plot!
Attractive particle
Ideal solution of particles Repulsive particle interactions interactions
Manfred Roessle EMBO Course 2012 © Fachhochschule Lübeck 2009
X-Ray scattering
X-ray scattering
Kratky plot
0.09
0.06
The scattering intensity of a globular
protein has a Gaussian-like shape at 0.05
monotonic increase.
X-ray scattering
Kratky plot
The Kratky plot is typically used to analyze the conformation of proteins, but can
be used to analyze the random walk model of polymers.
X-ray scattering
Porod invariant
Another important overall value computed from the SAXS data is the
so-called Porod invariant Q:
I s ds Q
2
s Porod 1951
0
Contrary to Rg, the Porod invariant depends only on the particle volume and not
on its form.
For the Porod analysis, the behavior of the scattering intensity at higher scattering
vectors plays a significant role.
This higher angle part of the I(s) corresponds to the small interparticle distances.
Therefore in the high s regime the scattering from the internal structure and in
particular near the particle surface S is dominating the signal.
X-ray scattering
Porod volume
I s 4
K
s
introducing K as a constant depended on surface of the scattering particle.
This specific surface value can be estimated directly from the asymptotic behavior of
the plot
s4 I(s) versus s
K S
Q V
Q s 2 I ( s) ds
s 0
Q = Porod invariant
S shape to
volume ratio
V
Rule of thumb: Porod volume is approximately two times molecular weight
Here BSA: MW 66 kDa; Porod volume 115
Protein solution
I(s) [a.u.]
1
0.01
0.001
All SAXS beamlines are highly oversubscribed and “working horses” on their
facilities!
The scientific applications ranging from soft condensed matter, nano-science and
fiber diffraction on ordered biological systems up to structural biology in solution.
SPring 8, Hyogo
Cathode Anode
Vacuum
Bruker NanoStar
Heating
Bruker NanoStar
Anton Paar SAXSess
Rigaku BioSAXS 1000
X-ray sources
Brilliance
X-ray optics
Beam defining
Problem:
Beam defining by slit pairs: Every edge cutting the beam produces
parasitic scattering! Refractive streaks at low
angles impedes SAXS experiments!
Solution:
Successive slit systems. First slits cutting the beam and
second system cuts out the undesired parasitic scattering
X-ray Optics
Monochromator
n 2d sin
For instance a Si 111 crystal 2
with d-spacing (=distance
between the crystal lattice) of
d=3.14 Å deflects the beam for
a wavelength of =1 Å to ~
10° (9.16°).
Problem:
The Bragg condition is also fulfilled for multiple orders of the wavelength n. These
higher order have to be filtered by the X-ray mirror
for focusing. 1
0.9
0.8
0.7
reflectivity
Bending of the highly 0.6
0.5
polished mirror surface 0.4
permits focusing on the 0.3
0.2
parabolic mirror profile 0.1
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
angles [deg]
Beamshutter
with diode for
Beamstop with diode for measurement measurement of
of transmitted beam incident beam
(prior to
exposure)
1000 mm
Sample cell
1400 mm
X-ray detectors
Single photon counting detectors
Bump bonding over small
indium metal balls.
Expensive technology!
The Porod and Kratky analysis is valid at the high s regime and the
scattering occurs from the internal structure. The Kratky plot gives
information of the folding state of a protein.
From the Porod analysis the specific volume of a protein can be
derived.
X = A A
B
A
B
A
B
A A A A
Protein molecule Lattice Protein crystal with fixed
positions
1 2
s sin 2
A d
A
I s r e dV
2
is r
V
Radial
sin( sr)
I(s) [a.u.]
is r
e avarage 1
0.1
sr 0.01
2 0.001
sin( sr )
I ( s)4 (r )r
0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 s [Å]
2
dr 1-dim data
0
sr
Manfred Roessle EMBO Course 2012 © Fachhochschule Lübeck 2009
X-Ray scattering
Protein crystallography