Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Growling Bear
As of the market’s close on July 15, 2008, the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the
Standard & Poor’s 500 Index were off 23.2% and 22.9% from their respective peaks,
achieved last October 11th, with year-to-date losses of 17.4% and 17.3%. The technology-
laden NASDAQ had fallen 22.6% since peaking on October 31st, and is down 16.5%
1
since the beginning of 2008. Few industry sectors have been spared, and the pain is
global, with most major equity markets around the world sustaining double-digit
percentage losses year to date. Homebuilding, banks, thrifts, and securities brokerage
stocks have been particularly hard hit, with many individual components posting losses
that well exceed 50%. In the last bear market, the DJIA fell 39.7% in a slide that
extended from January, 2000 to October, 2002. The S&P 500 plunged 50.5% during the
same period, while NASDAQ surrendered a whopping 78.4% of its value. In the
previous, brief bear market of 1987, which culminated with the October 19th crash, the
DJIA, S&P 500, and NASDAQ slumped 41.2%, 35.9%, and 36.8%, respectively.
The longest-term LEAPS currently available expire on February 19, 2010, the regular
February expiration date for that year. When the maturity of the LEAPS gets down to
around nine months, the LEAPS become regularly listed options and the options
exchanges assign them standard option tickers. Concurrently, the exchanges list new
LEAPS that expire one year further out.
LEAPS have a number of features that make them attractive to options buyers. Key
among them is the fact that even though they cost more, in terms of time premium, than
shorter-term options, they have a relatively low rate of time decay or “theta”. In other
words, they tend to lose their value at a much slower rate. For example, if the price of a
stock were to stay unchanged for one month, a three-month call would lose about 20% of
its value. By comparison, with all things being equal, a two-year leap would probably
lose only about 2.5% of its value in that month.
Strategic Possibilities
As with standard options, LEAPS can be used in myriad ways. Investors anticipating a
rebound in the stock market, for example, can buy a LEAPS call as a substitute for the
underlying stock, especially if the underlying stock is trading at a nominally high price.
Those looking for further declines can buy LEAPS puts, either to profit from additional
weakness or to protect stocks that are already in the portfolio. The LEAPS’ long
expiration gives the holder more time for his or her objective for the stock (market) to be
achieved. Moreover, investors who believe that the prevailing mood in the market have
inflated option premiums can sell “naked” LEAPS calls and puts or engage in covered
call writing. Spreading is also possible, whereby in-the-money or at-the money LEAPS
are purchased and out-of-the-money, or same strike, but shorter duration, options are
sold.
2
A Strategy for the Times
As noted previously, LEAPS are more expensive than standard options. It’s also
important to note that they tend to have a very high exposure to changes in implied
volatility; this is especially important to know in a high volatility environment. This
means that if you bought an out-of-the-money LEAPS and its implied volatility fell by
25%, then the price of the option would fall by almost the same magnitude, even with
little change in the underlying stock. Given these features, the prevailing uncertainties in
the economy, along with our expectation that the stock markets will “eventually”
rebound, we think deep-in-the-money LEAPS make sense for a lot of portfolios.
The deep-in-the-money LEAPS are attractive for the following reasons: 1) Their
extended maturities give the holder time for the various problems in the economy to be
worked out and for the stock (market) to rebound. 2) The time premium on these options
can actually be less than the carrying cost of the underlying stock, depending on how
deep-in-the-money. For example, on July 15, 2008, the asking price of the Medtronics
January, 2010 $30 call was $23.70, with the stock trading at $52.51. The time premium
on one contract would be $119 ($30+$23.70-$52.41x100). The cost differential between
owning the stock and the LEAPS is $2,881 ($52.51-$23.70x100), for 100 shares.
Assuming an interest rate of 6% per annum, owning the stock to the option’s expiration
date would cost an additional $259, which is $140 more than the time premium. 3) The
holder of the LEAPS has less downside exposure, with his or her financial risk limited to
$2,370, whereas the stockholder could lose $5,251. All in all, deep-in-the-money LEAPS
offer the advantages of a smaller cash commitment, limited downside risk, and essentially
full participation in the upside. Thus, investors could use LEAPS to take new positions in
beaten down stocks that look good for the long haul and/or replace (as proxies) existing
stock positions in which they want to maintain a presence.