Professional Documents
Culture Documents
by
Gary Kosloski
'y
May, 1977
ProQuest Number: 10296671
uest.
ProQuest 10296671
Published by ProQuest LLC (2016). Copyright of th e Dissertation is held by th e Author.
ProQuest LLC.
789 East Eisenhower Parkway
P.O. Box 1346
Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 - 1346
Accepted by the faculty of the School of Music, Indiana University,
iractor of Document
hairm*
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS....................................................... iv
INTRODUCTION................... . ................................... 1
Chapter
I. BIOGRAPHY.................................................... 4
VIII. CONCLUSION.................................................... 92
APPENDIX............................................................... 95
BIBLIOGRAPHY..........................................................101
iii
LIST OF EXAMPLES
Example
iv
Example
v
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This document has been prepared during the tenure of two consec
given me support are too many to list, but I would especially like to
thank Dr, Charles H. Webb, Dean of the School of Music, for his per
Leopold Auer as a topic, and who has had the patience and solicitude
print, from his own private library, but his own vast and encyclopedic
friendship and council, and for much, much more, I owe a lifetime of
thanks.
GK
Berea, Ohio
INTRODUCTION
qualities in greater degree and measure than the norm, and as a result
tinct, and remains with us for the rest of our lives, leaving an
Very few are so endowed with such a quality to inspire, but those
few who are, proportionate to their gifts, have assured their place
1
2
the arts, for it does not easily lend itself to verbal articulation
music, what gives it life and meaning to those who listen. And words
Goethe once wrote to Zelter, "I hear so much said about music; which
not mute. For music is truly one of the purest expressions and
culating and giving reasons for the greatness of the teaching and
^As quoted in Carl Flesch, The Art of Violin Playing (New York:
Carl Fischer, 1924-1930), II, 1.
3
his success and importance. This can be done by tracing the history
of his life and career, commenting on the composers with whom he came
into contact and whose works bear his name in dedication, tracing the
and the students to whom he taught it. But even with this examination
completed, one can only glean the shallowest understanding of the art
duty to hand it on like those Greek runners who passed on the lighted
this same spirit and flame to which Heifetz' teacher, Leopold Auer,
BIOGRAPHY
and five, he displayed an aptitude for music and was duly presented
with a violin, which was then the most popular and easily accessible
class of Ridley Kohne, who was then the concertmaster of the National
His progress was such that he was invited to make his Budapest debut
a benefit concert.
young boy was brought to the attention of certain music lovers who
undertook to send him to Vienna for further studies with Jacob Dont.
Auer later stated that it was, in fact, Dont who initially laid the
4
5
young Auer was obliged to leave the conservatory, from which he re
ceived a diploma and a silver medal, having completed his courses with
honors. Then he and his father, and a needy pianist, toured the pro
vinces in order to raise money to support the rest of the Auer family
Karl Goldmark in Vienna, and played for the great Belgian violinist,
distasteful.^
In the fall of the same year, young Auer and his father left
Paris for Hanover and further studies, this time with the great
proved to be most important for the young man. Not only did Joachim
came into contact with some of the most important musical personalities
and Johannes Brahms, with whom he once played the Beethoven Sonata ,
It was after the Auers left Hanover in 1864, having once again
twenty years earlier, his master, Joachim, had made his auspicious
d£but. The concerts at the Gewandhaus had by that time launched many
accepted.
Brussels) to hear the great artists of the day perform and to make
quartet scored quite a success, and at the same time the young vio
brothers' quartet, who had fallen ill. This group was enjoying great
Hamburg duties, he was on tour for extended periods with the Miiller
Quartet.
position in St. Petersburg, where he remained until 1917 and the out
break of the Bolshevist Revolution, that Auer began the most fruitful
and served as its director until his untimely death in 1881. He was
Conservatory there until 1867 (when Zaremba succeeded him), and again
cal eminence, that both the St. Petersburg and Moscow Conservatories,
There was also the legendary Josef Hoffmann, who went to Dresden to
the class of Leopold Auer, which produced some of the most fabulous
violinists the musical world has ever heard. Indeed, Russia at that
The gifted young products of this cultural milieu were well pro
vided for. Once they had reached and often surpassed the exacting
was the case with Tchaikovsky and Rimsky-Korsakoff, who taught at the
and Cui), a very important musical influence who took it upon them
Russian music, and were not above voicing their criticism of such
led the St. Petersburg Quartet, which included Jean Pickel, Weickmann,
and Davidoff. One of their main functions was to perform the chamber
music works of many of the young talented composers, thus giving them
an opportunity to hear their works played. Auer was also solo vio
of the Russian Musical Society, a post which had been held with varying
ductor, Auer proved himself highly capable. During the course of his
soloist with the orchestra. For his sincere and persevering efforts,
St. Vladimir. Yet however noble AuerTs attempts were at making this
ment with the board of directors over a deficit of 4,000 roubles. The
During the next few years, which witnessed the untimely deaths
Tchaikovsky in Odessa, Berlin, and Munich, all of which met with great
From the year 1903, until his death, Auer devoted his time pri
taught first in New York, and then for a period at the Curtis Institute
of 85, having lived a very full life. Auer contributed most signifi
cantly to the musical life of two countries and presented the musical
AUER AS A VIOLINIST
his later life, he might perhaps have achieved an even greater repu
alities with whom he came into contact during his lifetime, summarizes
Auer's playing: "As a violinist, his chief virtues are said to have
2
been his clean technique and his elegance."
12
13
ment that the old master, who was by then approaching seventy, did not
debut at the age of 11 playing the Mendelssohn Violin Concerto, Opus 64,
(1856), his Paris d&but at age 16 playing the Spohr Concerto No. 8
in Leipzig at the age of 19, and later in the same year, 1864, his
and a tour of the European capitals organized by the New York impre
were those connected with the highly regarded Imperial Russian Ballet.
American tour with Anton Rubinstein, as the solo violinist for the
famous Ballet Russe under the direction of Serge Diaghilev, and in
cluded among its numbers dancers such as the legendary Wassily Nijinsky
and Anna Pavlova. Auer's function was to play only those violin solos
very high and most prominent, especially from those famous ballets
Along with this prestigious appointment came the title "Soloist to the
Czar" and a sizeable annual stipend. Auer retained that post until
Garden. At this time London was a second home for many French
sojourn that Auer came into contact with important personalities like
soloist with the Russian Musical Society, and also in trios with
august Franz Liszt and to study further the "new music" of Liszt and
During the next three decades, Auer led an active concert career,
and Russia. The success he won and the reputation he earned confirm
own arrangements and original cadenzas, which, for the most part,
have given way to modern tastes and are no longer a part of the
made Auer a violinist of the first order, as one can hear from the
only two recordings he ever made. These two discs were recorded by
the aging master on the occasion of his 75th birthday, asa souvenir
for his students.^ In spite of the artist*s advanced age and the
can still get some idea of Auerfs fiery temperament in the effortless
way in which he dashes off the Brahms Hungarian Dance No. 1. At the
other end of the emotional gamut, one can hear the sweetness and
beauty of his tone in his gently lyrical and very moving reading of
made Auer and those of his students who shared these attributes with
him the ideal interpreters of Russian music. And his influence was
felt by the young composers who came intocontact with him, several
of whose works bear his name in dedication. Two such examples which
have retained their place inthe repertoire and withstood the rigors
Two works dedicated to Auer that have since faded into obscurity
Taneyev had no sympathy with the nationalists. His own works tend to
associated with his name is the Tchaikovsky Violin Concerto, Opus 35.
and rededicated to Adolph Brodsky (1851-1929), who gave the work its
Vienna premiere. The stories that have filtered down through the
are shrouded in a romantic haze obscuring what few vague facts we are
19
20
But in spite of its musical merits, Auer states that he felt that
there were certain passages and sections which were completely unvio-
suggest certain changes and revisions which would render the work more
playable. However, due to other duties, Auer laid the Violin Concerto
aside, and it was not until after several years had elapsed that he
turned his attention to the work and provided the long overdue revi
During this time, he and his brother were joined by his close friend
von Meek, because of his loose tongue and indiscreet gossiping, which
during his brief lifetime. This devotion was returned on the part of
famous liaison between Tchaikovsky and Mme. von Meek, who provided
the composer with the financial security to leave his position at the
Conservatory and devote his time and energy completely to his own com
posing. And since Kotek was at the same time a friend of Tchaikovsky’s
with answers to the many questions about the composer whose work she
and which eventually led to his own dismissal from the household.
22
hear some, if not all, of the work. And is it not feasible to think
matters with which he might not have been familiar? All things con
that many of the changes in his later "revised version" are more diffi
dissuade the French virtuoso, Emile Sauret, from playing the work),
Several years elapsed before anything more was heard about the
powerful music critic at the time for the Neue freie Presse in Vienna,
fell upon the work with merciless vitriol and reduced it to shreds
been observed, these changes were not made with the intention of
are more demanding than the original. Rather, they were made with
during the composer's lifetime, and the violin and piano score edited
by Auer and published by Jurgenson. They point out the various differ
the aforementioned edit ion. The change is, in this case, a simplifi
cation, for he eliminates the double stops thereby reducing the figure
Auer’s concern in this instance was that the double stop passage might
sound too muddy due to the rather heavy detache fouette stroke that
they are more easily heard. He does, however, restore the double
before Tchaikovsky.
cresc.
restez
cresc.
2 4 3
>
board which must be executed with ease and accuracy (Example 5).
29
dim.
V *)
ti p 7 ' isa a sT
L i j = ^ = ^ o |
V '
i o g / ^ p j
f\ ii 3-
quality very much in keeping with the essence of the original. In the
bowing.
a d lib.
V is-,
octave higher.
(Example 1).
32
an
Three measures after the Allegro giusto in the Coda, Auer changes
4Allegro giusto
realez
resies rcstez i 1
figuration.
f o l stringendo
bafca. P - H
M
s5m jTirof~>l
,
r v iZ T U j
tf
=
cresc.
—i
»ji
M C5E5? ESS
cresc.
O f
S I
where the principle theme of this movement is stated for the last
but for the first time in the entire slow movement, the theme moves
$ £ te
cresc.
ment are the cuts he suggests, which have become almost universally
according to Auer, were done with the consent and approval of the
1
composer. These cuts eliminate superfluous and redundant repetitions
The first cut occurs 16 measures after Tempo I and extends for
Since the same thematic section reappears twice during the course of
the movement, Auer consistently cuts the same 12 measures each time.
This occurs 24 measures before letter E on page 27, mm. 22-33, and
There are also two minor changes in the text that Auer suggests
which occur twice, before the Poco meno mosso, 9 and 13 measures
Tchaikovsky indicated.
40
cresc.
Quasi andante
Auer makes in this movement occurs during the seven measures before the
Tempo I
stringendo
discussed— his teaching. Few teachers have ever reached the apogee of
talent and ability. One could do no better. Ysaye, Sevcik, Hubay all
had their followers and produced brilliant violinists, but not in the
cedented extent, dominated violin playing for the next two generations.
were of this calibre. But the brilliance of the stars was undeniably
42
43
regarded as the more progressive of the two. And with the illustrious
any need for talented young Russian musicians to leave their native
overwhelming numbers from the four corners of this land, and the most
musicians from Russia who enjoyed such enormous public favor in the
1907, winning the gold medal and a scholarship of 7000 rubles, and
playing the Brahms Violin Concerto, Opus 77, to great critical acclaim.
was married twice. His first wife was the famous singer Alma Gluck,
with whom he recorded several songs with violin obbligato, and for
whom he wrote many songs. His second wife was Mary Louise Curtis Bok,
who, in fact, was the founder of the institute bearing her name.
mance editions of their works. Although none of his own works have
string quartet, and various works for orchestra, such as his American
Korsakoff’s Cog d ’Qr . Mr. Zimbalist, still alive at the time of this
was Mischa Elman (1891-1967), who perhaps did even more than Zimbalist
born in Tolna, and received his early training at the Imperial Music
and four months.^- But this must have been a period of the most inten
sive kind of preparation, since during this time, Auer arranged for
his Berlin d&but which took place on October 14, 1904, and created a
sensation. This was as bold as it was risky because not long before,
had just made his enormously successful debut in Berlin (which was
then the musical center of Europe and the domain of the still reigning
Elman made an equally successful London debut. After this, his study
An American tour followed in 1908, during which he made his New York
enjoy national and international fame. His early recordings for Victor
ing that remained faithful to him throughout his lifetime. His playing
was characterized above all by the beauty and sweetness of the enormous
with his father, Ruvin Heifetz, who was himself an accomplished player.
study continued for the next six years, interrupted only intermittently
age of 12) with Artur Nikisch conducting, in Vienna with Safonov, and
escaping with his family from Russia during the Revolution, Heifetz
made his memorable New York debut on October 27, 1917, in Carnegie
Hall. His long-awaited London debut took place on May 5, 1920, at the
During the course of his career, the rest of which is now history,
violin playing for half a century. Flesch, one not known for hasty
his sound, and the breadth and poetry of his readings have given
But at the same time in Auer's class, there were others, who,
own right. Among them is Toscha Seidel, who started playing the violin
at age seven, studying with Max Fiedemann in Odessa, and then contin
1912. Later, he too immigrated to the United States and had a signifi
cant career. There was also the fabulously gifted Miron Poliakin from
Kiev, for whom Auer held the highest hopes. He made an impressive
American ddbut, but found that he suffered excessively from nerves and
violinist who was a member of the class at this time. She made many
for his many fine compositions; Max Rosen; Josef Borissoff (brother
Kreuger, Sergei Korguev and Paul Stassevitsch, all of whom were Auer's
Stravinsky transcriptions and his work with the composer; and finally,
Between the years 1906 and 1911, Auer, whose reputation had been
From 1912 until 1914 and the outbreak of the First World War,
.new American students Thelma Given, David Hochstein, and Ruth Ray,
St. Petersburg, came to study. During the summers of the war years,
Auer taught in Norway, at which time Maia Bang studied with him. She
his beloved Russia, the master departed for the United States.
legendary figure by the time he arrived in New York, and it was not
long before he became the most sought after teacher, soon developing
the School of Musical Art (which later became the Juilliard School of
Music). He also taught for a few years at the Curtis Institute and
was succeeded by his student Efrem Zimbalist upon his departure. His
summer master classes were first held at Lake George, New York, and
later at the Chicago Musical College. Among his better known pupils
from this period (and there were many) were Sylvia Lent, Gilbert Ross,
Shumsky. The list is endless. This gives only a brief summary of the
He divides these into three basic schools: (1) German, which he calls
the older manner, (2) Franco-Belgian, the newer manner, and (3) Russian,
teach the latter bow hold to his students, but at the same time ob
serves that there is speculation that Henri Wieniawski also held his
bow in this way. The basic difference between these various schools
is the point of contact between the bow stick and the index finger.
Joachim and his followers, as having the lower surface of the index
finger pressing on the stick between the first and second joints, the
thumb opposite the middle finger, and the rest of the fingers pressed
50
51
Vieuxtemps* students, notably Ysaye, has the stick coming into contact
with the index finger at the extreme end of the second joint, which
is notably separated from the other fingers of the hand with the thumb
opposite the middle finger. Flesch describes the bow hair as exces
The Russian bow grip as proposed by Auer has the index finger
coming into contact with the stick at the line separating the second
and third joints, leaving the remainder of the index finger free to
embrace the stick with the first and second joints. The interval
between the first and second fingers is not exaggerated and the little
finger remains on the stick only in the lower half of the bow, and a
more extended angle of the hand in the upper half causes the little
finger naturally to come off of its own accord. The bow hair is
slack. Flesch credits this way of holding the bow with achieving the
right arm motion in each of the preceding schools. With the German
dropped or lowered elbow close to the body, and the position of the
thumb strongly pressed against the lower surface of the index finger
the thumb appears across from the second finger pressing laterally
towards the end of the second joint. During the execution of the
1Ibid., I, 51.
52
nation occurs when the Russian manner of holding the bow is adopted
and the turning motion of the arm is some forty-five degrees. He sup
ports his argument that this method yields the maximum tonal results
pressure exerted by the arm on a fixed object, in this case the bow,
in the angle of bow hair to string which flattens the hair at the tip,
tency of volume at this point of the bow, the fullest weight of the
The opposite is true during the process of the up-bow when the raising
of the wrist and elbow reduces the amount of hair on the string near
very nature of the way the bow is held that provides for an automatic
Russian approach. This, one might add, was not part of his own
and also for the broad-minded attitude with which he approached the
But it also shows the far-reaching impact that the Auer students and
the Auer school had on violin playing in the early decades of the
twentieth century.
2Ibid.
54
ceding statement:
question:
In light of all that has been written and observed regarding the
so-called "Russian" bowhold, from his own writings it would seem that
Auer himself did not make hard and fast rules about the placement of
the index finger on the stick of the bow, nor the pronation of the
forearm during the drawing of the bow. Indeed, he probably would have
been amazed to firv d all of this the object of such close analytical
2Ibid., p. 172.
55
observation that there is no "correct” way to hold the bow and that
abhor that rigidity and those inflexible qualities which were never
^Ibid., p. 36.
56
preferable, but points to the greater end that each of these artists
one must bear in mind that Auerfs most significant pedagogic contri
his class was always comprised of the most technically advanced and
musically gifted students, whom from the first he could teach on the
since in the course of eight books, Auer progresses from the basic
1Ibid., p. 37 f.
57
keen insights into the complexities of violin playing and how to avoid
level, his discussion on how to hold and draw the bow is more detailed
line his basic approach to the position of the bow in the right hand,
the security and function of each finger, the action of the wrist and
the proper attitude of the arm during the execution of the strokes:
2Ibid., I, 12.
58
where the basic wrist position is not changed, but also in which the
accomplished, the forearm must be free enough in its motion from the
elbow and able to rotate on its axis, thereby not disturbing the basic
other words, this is the pronation that Flesch observes and remarks
art was certainly not then the sophisticated science into which it has
developed today. This might perhaps explain the rather stilted and
consideration that when these photographs were taken (the book was
1Ibid., I, 13.
59
published in 1926), Auer was around 80. Third, as has been pointed
nowhere does Auer make hard and fast dogmatic statements about the
artist and respected and successful teacher, Auer, taking his own
came to his own solution of right arm problems adhering to his own
guidelines and the exceptions for which he allows. But most signi
ficant of all is the fact that when the bow is picked up and held in
any position with the relaxed wrist that Auer stresses in all the
string or object upon which it can come to rest. This is the case in
finds that the position of the hand on the stick, the position of
the contact of the finger joints, and the attitude and pronation of
the arm during the process of drawing a down-bow, are exactly what he
1Ibid., I, 12-13.
CHAPTER VI
AUER AS A TEACHER
his whole approach to the right arm and to the question of the bow
hold and how this subsequently affected and changed bow technique.
It, one can note and appreciate other concepts which, even though
tion, From the outset, Auer outlines the basic prerequisites with
supposes the necessary desire and ambition and the capacity to profit
the contrary:
60
61
On the basis of statements like this, and indeed, from the tenor
of all his writings, it is obvious that Auer was not a music educator
great talent. His interest was not to expose young people to music
talent that lay within those few whose dedication to art was all-
consuming. His was never the approach for the dilettante. Judging
this great teacher and of those who worked with him. In contrast
v
to pedagogues like Flesch and Sevcik, his approach is quite un-
a high position of the violin which, he feels, frees the left hand
for ease of motion, and also increases the vibration of the instru
reasons that such devices dampen the open vibration of the back of
intense concentration:
But their musical taste (or what does service for them
in place of it) does not tell them that they can reduce
a program of the most dissimilar pieces to the same dead
level of monotony by peppering them all with the tabasco
of a continuous vibrato. No, the vibrato is an effect,
an embellishment; it can lend a touch of divine pathos
to the climax of a phrase or the course of a passage,
but only if the player has cultivated a delicate sense
of proportion in the use of it.-*-
notes, and they were considered the definitive arbiters of what was
of another age, and it must not have been without difficulty for
school, Elman, Heifetz and Seidel, one of the most striking fea
their sounds, all three with the individual and unique stamp of
tions says:
the development of the vibrato and its sparing use from Spohr to
2Ibid., I, 40.
65
Joachim and Thompson and Sarasate to Ysaye*s close but lovely vibrato,
penchant for a continuous vibrato was not well accepted in the early
tion and admiration of his public, and leading violin playing into
^Flesch, A r t , I, 40.
2Ibid.
66
uninspired way. Apart from his discussions of the detache stroke and
the son file, which he describes as forming the foundation of all bow
the following bow strokes: the mar tele, produced at the point of the
bow by pressing down on the string using the wrist exclusively; the
the upper arm and stiffening the wrist to the point of inflexibility;
the staccato volant ("flying staccato"), where the bow leaves the
staccato, by combining the use of the wrist and the upper arm; the
which Auer derives from a slight detache using the wrist, and which
bow to drop on the string with an elastic motion of the wrist, con
from the present day orchestral tremolo), for which Auer cites
Opus 64.
(which he, himself, must have done to a large extent) and in certain
with accuracy and ease, but he does stress that the process should be
clutching the neck of the instrument, which would impede the ease
them not to think about it too much, and give them the
rules I have just laid down.^
1Ibid., p. 88.
2Ibid., p. 93.
69
works that were clearly beyond their ability at the moment, the
obviously expected hard work and sacrifice from his students, but
maximum potential. One can see that more and more clearly as one
logical and sound pedagogic principles, Auer really has very little
y
new to say technically. Certainly teachers like Sevcik and Flesch
violin technique. But they never produced the students Auer did,
70
certainly not in such numbers. No, we must look past these somewhat
the pages of the book, are by far the most interesting. Here he
puts aside any attempts at analysis and speaks from the heart,
articulating his own very definite feelings about the art of inter
1Ibid., p. 144.
2Ibid., p. 154.
71
artist, that many present-day musicologists would take issue with his
Auer opens his argument with the famous quotation of Buffon: ”Le
style est l'homme meme,” and continues with the contentious state
Even though one can disagree with the basic premise of his
cannot help but respect his devotion for the art he tries to serve.
1Ibid., p. 165.
3Ibid., p. 169.
72
and tradition:
This is not a very scholarly point of view. But it does not preclude
research tells us. And indeed, Auer does in his own way subscribe
1Ibid., p. 176.
73
tangible, once heard, forever lost, with only the essence of its
persuasive statements:
1Ibid., p. 183.
2Ibid., p, 182.
74
his intense and demanding personality must have given his teaching
his own words, every epoch has its own aesthetic and assigns certain
1Ibid., p. 175,
75
his results, nor can one deny the importance of his influence.
which he was ill-adapted. Now one can get a better insight into
what it might have been like to study with the great teacher by
not provided. It seems that Auer had little patience with mechan
medium in which the student can best work to bring out his own
the tradition of Dont and Joachim, would play. Reflecting his German
eral Vivaldi concerti; and some late Baroque works by Nardini and Locatel-
li. Then one finds a reverent discussion of the Bach Sonatas and Par
titas for Solo Violin, three Mozart concerti (the predictable Concerto
linits his survey of the works of Beethoven (apart from the great
since he brings to them not only his own insights based on his years
on the platform and in the studio, but those of others. Here one
can benefit from the richness of a lifetime that spanned the second
artists with whom he came into contact and had the pleasure of
the time of writing, he was the only Joachim student still living
to have studied the work with the master* The same is true when
the Beethoven and Brahms concertos, works with which he was unfor
Wieniawski's unique style, the panache with which he played his own
works, and also his fabulous staccato and the dazzling way he
dim.
p p tranquillo
Scottish Fantasy, Opus 46, and the Concerto in D Minor, Opus 44,
criticized for his taste in choice of works and also for the fact
that he does not venture into the twentieth century, he does point .
out the merits of two violin concertos that have unjustly fallen
from the standard repertoire, the Dvorak Concerto in A Minor, Opus 53?
and the Elgar Concerto in B Minor, Opus 61 (in the latter work, Auer
79
ventures past 190Q by ten years, but Elgar^s idiom is, of course,
E Major and A Minor are inferior works and are of little musical or
examples of many.
respect would be all too easy. In doing so, one would miss the
to certain works and how he feels one might approach them, based on
very essence of the book, which is, indeed, its strength. Auer makes
^Ibid., p , AO,
or draws conclusions refuted by modern scholarship. His musicianly
from his specialized manner of holding the bow, the chief character
Over and over one finds stressed that Auer’s teaching was
geared towards the individual. The unique talent of the student and
81
82
his own cryptic way, discussing the concept of the Auer school or
method:
in mind that with a country as vast as Russia, Auer must have been
fame. From the 1880Ts and even 1890's, one hears of no famous
that Auer had somewhat less talented students with whom he could
needs and potential of that student, who was evidently better able
his students confirm that Auer did not teach technique per se .
In spite of the fact that Auer gives a list of studies and etude
nical work and was a great advocate of scale study. But these
were things the student was to do on his own. One notable exception
to this policy that we know of was Thelma Given who records that
Auer, finding her technically deficient when she first came to him,
assigned her nothing but etudes and scales for six months.
This speaks very well for Miss Given and the high regard Auer
must have had for her innate gifts, for more than adequate and
class. As he explained:
with whom he worked on a purely artistic level* Such was the case
were able and devoted repetateurs. They were concerned only with the
out were unimportant to him. That was left to the help of the
Auer saying, "Play with your feet if you must, but make the violin
3
sound!" Technique was regarded only a means, not an end in itself.
1Ibid,, p. 29,
2Ibid., p. 219.
3Ibid., p. 223,
the traces of their roughness are hidden to the un
practiced eye.l
1Ibid., p. 219.
3Ibid., p. 48.
86
demonstrate (he taught with the violin in his hand), the class it<-
feeling was so keen among the students at the Conservatory that each
2
one was compelled to work hard technically,"
and the exposition of these ideals w as his whole aim and purpose
Artistry and beauty of feeling were the raisons d'etre for his
echoed time and time again by his various students who have
personality of the student to whom the work was being taught. Once
1Ibid., p. 27.
2
Frederick H, Martens, String Mastery (New York: Stokes,
1923), p. 19.
3Ibid., p. 127,
88
saying:
brilliant results:
them. This is what Auer means by bringing out "what nature has
3Ibid,, p. 16.
89
already given." But this presupposes that nature has already given
talented student. He had neither the patience nor the ability for
working with those who had nothing innately to offer. And they,
in turn, could not meet the high standards or survive the competi
studied with him. The greater the talent, the greater the demands.
fore, his musical demands often took the form of pleas, exhortations,
Indeed, the strength of his personality insured that the demands were
^Ibid., p. 93.
90
But the greatest outbursts were reserved for the approach to the
1Ibid., p. 26,
2Ibid., p. 47.
3
Appelbaum, Artists, p. 303.
music itself* Auer had a deep respect for the great works in the
with him. The testimonials from students of the period are numerous
and esteem for the inspiration that Auer communicated to them. But
CONCLUSION
influential and effective in that regard than he. But they lacked
developed from the talents who came to study with him. It takes a
a great teacher to evoke that same quality in those few students who
possess it.
why Auer has had such brilliant pupils is that poor students were
92
93
pupil," but one must also have the artistic integrity, the inspira
to the extent that they all studied with the great master. When
Auer died, the Russian School of violin teaching died with him. He
art, and the greatness of its artists, who are consecrated to its
The recording industry has only managed to prolong that echo. Even
preserve their greatness for posterity will lose that magic incan
ities and oddities. As Auer himself said, "each age sets its own
its glory and its tragedy. But one must go on to make an equally
have been the case had Auer never taught. But an artist-teacher
class of violinists that has never been rivaled. What these stu
extends and prolongs that memory and influence to yet future genera
realize that what his pupils would give him would be his legacy.
APPENDIX
Auer, Leopold
Bang, Mala
II. CADENZAS
Auer, Leopold
1A11 works listed were edited for Carl Fischer, New York, unless
otherwise specified.
95
96
Tartini, Giuseppi
Auer, Leopold
Bazzini, Antonio
The Dance of the Goblins (La Ronde des Lutins) . New York: G.
Schirmer, 1921,
1916.
Brahms, Joannes
Sonata No. 3 in D Minor, Opus 108. Piano part ed. by R. Ganz, c. 1917.
l, Max
Chopin, Frederic
Conus, Jules
Corelli, Arcangelo
Dont, Jakob
Etincelles (Sparks) .
Drigo, Richard
Glazounov, Alexander
Goldmark, Carl
Grieg, Edvard
Kreutzer, Rodolphe
Mendelssohn, Felix
Paganini, Niccolo
Popper, David
Rode, Jacques-Pierre
Rubinstein, Anton
Schumann, Robert
Dedication (Widmung).
Spohr, Ludwig
Tartini, Giuseppi
Sonata in G Minor.
Tchaikovsky, Peter I.
Vieuxtemps, Henri
Vital!, Tommaso
Wagner, Richard
Wieniawski, Henri
Capriccio-Valse, Opus 7.
Auer, Leopold
"Fiddlers Two" from Book II, Graded Course of Ensemble Playing? 1926.
Wieniawski, Henri
V. VIOLIN ENSEMBLE
Appelbaum, Samuel and Sada. The Way They Play. Books I and II.
New Jersey: Paganiniana Publications, 1972.
Bang, Maia. Maia Bang Violin Method: Provided with Original Exercises
and Suggestions by Leopold Auer and Based on his Teaching Principles.
9 vols. New York: Carl Fischer, 1923-1925.
Bowen, Catherine Drinker, and Barbara von Meek. Beloved Friend. New
York: Little, Brown and Co., 1937.
101
102
Dubourg, George. The Violin. London: Robert Cocks and Co., 1878.
Ella, Prof. Musical Sketches Abroad and at Home. London: Reeves, 1878.
Gee, John, and Elliot Selby. The Triumph of Tchaikovsky. New York:
Vanguard, 1960.
Menuhin, Yehudi. Violin (Six Lessons with Yehudi Menuhin). New York:
Viking, 1971.
Discography
Editions of Music
GARY KOSLOSKI
Teachers:
1961-1969 Howard Leyton-Brown, Regina Conservatory of
Music; University of Saskatchewan
1969-1974 Josef Gingold, Indiana University
Summer Studies: 1968 Max Rostal, Adelboden, Switzerland
1972 Tadeusz Wronski, Indiana University
1974 Franco Gulli, Indiana University
Chamber Music Studies.: William Primrose, Janos Starker,
Gyorgy Sebok, Georges Janzer
Orchestral Experience:
1966-1969 Assistant Concertmaster, Regina Symphony
Orchestra
1966 & 1967 National Youth Orchestra (Canada),
1st Violins
1969 Concertmaster, International Congress of
Strings (Los Angeles)
1970 Concertmaster, Colorado Philharmonic Orchestra
1972-1973 Concertmaster, Indianapolis Philharmonic
Orchestra
1971-1974 Concertmaster, Indiana University Concert
Orchestras
1974-1975 Detroit Symphony Orchestra, 1st Violins
1975- Concertmaster, Ohio Chamber Orchestra
Chamber Music:
1975- Violinist in the Elysian Trio, Baldwin-Wallace
College, Berea, Ohio
Solo Appearances:
Indiana University Concert Orchestra
Colorado Philharmonic Orchestra (3 appearances)
Regina Symphony Orchestra
Violin Soloist in premiere of David Baker's Concerto
for Double Bass, Solo Violin, String Quartet,
and Jazz Band, with Gary Karr (Bloomington,
1973)
Frequent recitalist on CBC, both English and French
networks
Many recitals in both Canada and the United States
Teaching Experien c e :
1966-1969 Teaching Assistant, Regina Conservatory of
Music
1969-1974 Teaching Assistant, Indiana University
1975- Assistant Professor of Violin, Baldwin-
Wallace College, Berea, Ohio;
Head, Department of String Instruments,
Baldwin-Wallace College