Professional Documents
Culture Documents
developing countries:
The case of Egypt
Hussein H. Soliman
Southern Illinois University Carbondale, USA
Abstract
Due to the changes that developing countries are currently facing, social work
educators are forced to assess the curricula in order to help societies deal
with new waves of social problems. This study explores a number of factors
that contribute to the process of modernizing social work education in Egypt.
Keywords
developing countries, Egypt, modernization, social work education
In Russia and the eastern European countries it seems that the interest in
expanding social work education following the collapse of communism has
met many obstacles, including the need to change organizational cultures
and generate support for social work education in universities (Templeman,
2004); the need to redefine the social welfare ideology which had existed
for many years (Cemlyn, 1995); and the need to change the professional
profile and education curriculum to combat new problems such as crime,
unemployment and poverty (Majewska-Galeziak, 1998).
The proposed outcome of modernizing social work education is to equip
future social workers with the expertise, experience and skills to respond to
the needs of various population groups (e.g. children, women and elders) as
a way to ensure social and economic justice for vulnerable groups in society.
The purpose of this study is to examine the problems with social work educa-
tion programs in Egypt and the strategies adopted to reconstruct the curricula
so that it will be more responsive to society’s needs and expectations.
Accordingly, the study can serve as a model for the curriculum development
and modernization of many social work programs in developing countries.
Methodology
The population in this study consists of social work educators in Egypt,
including faculty members and program administrators (deans and directors)
in 13 schools of social work. A random sample of five schools was selected,
with a total of 150 members. Participants were invited to voluntarily partici-
pate in the study, with a letter explaining the study procedures and assuring
respondents about confidentiality of identity and information provided. A
total of 111 surveys were received, reflecting a response rate of 72 percent.
The study instrument was based on the available literature on social work
education and the ideas generated from discussion of the topic following a
presentation on the future of social work education in Egypt. The instrument
consists of four subs cales and a section for comments and suggestions. The
subscales or ‘domains’ in the instrument were defined as follows.
Perception on 1 2 3 4
Strategies on modernization
As the need for modernization becomes an issue in higher education, one
social work program has started a review of the levels and the direction of
such a change. Based on the observations from this process, below are
described a number of trends which have emerged and which were concep-
tualized as part of the directions for change.
was added to the group work department to reflect the ecological perspective.
Although such initiatives seem to advocate new directions, lack of consis-
tency in the theoretical foundation is still there. This can be also found in the
continuing reliance on the field method as the main structure of the educa-
tional curriculum.
For example, in Egypt, to move from the methods foundation to another
appropriate foundation, i.e. generalist practice or social development, the
focus should be on integrating different levels of knowledge with practice
with individuals, families, groups, organizations, the community and greater
systems. The need for an advanced level of social work education such as
concentrations in field practice; ageing; health; mental health; children, youth
and families; social policy; and social administration would be extensions of
advanced-level social work graduate study.
of new trends in social work education. This can bridge the gap in knowl-
edge and serve as a model to help faculty and administrators understand the
process for curricula change (Jayaratne, 2007). This may also help to lessen
resistance among faculty members, provide avenues to learn new methods
of teaching social work and offer strategies for evaluating outcomes. Finally,
Egypt and other developing countries can benefit from the findings of the
study and the process presented for identifying and examining major factors
related to modernizing social work education.
Note
This paper was presented at the 53rd Annual Program Meeting, Council on Social
Work Education, San Francisco, Ca, 27–30 October 2007.
References
Abu Almati, M. (2005) ‘Quality of Social Work Education and Practice: Between
Reality and Expectation of Modernization’, paper presented at the 18th Annual
Social Work Conference, Helwan University, Helwan, Egypt, 8–19 March.
Abu Baker, S. (1997) Introduction to Social Work. Cairo: Commerce and Cooperation
Publishers.
Adams, R. and J. Page (2005) ‘Do International Migration and Remittances Reduce
Poverty in Developing Countries?’, World Development 33(10): 1645–99.
Ahmadi, N. (2003) ‘Globalization of Consciousness and New Challenges for
International Social Work’, International Journal of Social Welfare 12: 14–23.
Al-Faramawy, M. (2006) ‘Description of Social Work Curricula: In Response to
Quality Education Initiative’, unpublished proposal submitted to the Quality of
Education Committee at Helwan University, Egypt.
Alphonse, M., P. George and K. Moffatt (2008) ‘Redefining Social Work Standards
in the Context of Globalization: Lessons from India’, International Social Work
51(2): 145–58.
Bakilana, A., D. Bundy, J. Brown and B. Fredriksen (2005) ‘Accelerating the
Education Sector Response to HIV/AIDS in Africa: A Review of World Bank
Assistance’, World Bank Global HIV/AIDS Program Discussion paper (August).
Washington, DC: World Bank.
Carter, M. and C. Barrett (2006) The Economics of Poverty Traps and Persistent
Poverty: An Asset-based Approach. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Cemlyn, S. (1995) ‘Social Work in Russia and the UK: What Are We Exchanging?’,
Social Work Education 14(1): 77–92.
Chou, Y., M. Haj-Yahia, F. Wang and L. Fu (2006) ‘Social Work in Taiwan:
A Historical and Critical Review’, International Social Work 49(6): 767–78.
Craft, C. and H. Smaldone (2002) ‘The Arms Trade and the Incidence of Political
Violence in Sub-Saharan Africa’, Journal of Peace Research 39(6): 693–10.
Estes, R. (1992) Internationalizing Social Work Education: A Guide to Resources
for a New Century. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Gray, M. and J. Fook (2004) ‘The Quest for a Universal Social Work: Some Issues
and Implications’, Social Work Education 23(5): 625–44.
Gray, M. and F. Mazibuko (2002) ‘Social Work in South Africa at the Dawn of the
New Millennium’, International Journal of Social Welfare 11(3): 191–200.
Healy, L.M. (1992) Introducing International Development Content in the Social
Work Curriculum. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
Heidenheimer, A. and M. Johnston (2002) Political Corruption: Concept and
Context, 3rd edn. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Hoefer, R. (1996) ‘A Conceptual Model for Studying Social Welfare Policy
Comparatively’, Journal of Social Work Education 32(1): 101–13.
Jayaratne, S. (2007) ‘Michigan Master’s Curriculum in Social Work’, paper presented
at the 20th Annual Social Work Conference, Helwan University, Helwan, Egypt,
11–12 March.
Ku, H., S. Yeung and P. Sung-Chan (2005) ‘Searching for a Capacity Building Model
in Social Work Education in China’, Social Work Education 24(2): 213–33.
Majewska-Galeziak, A. (1998) ‘Educating for Social Work in Poland: Challenges
of the Transformation Period’, European Journal of Social Work 1(1): 95–100.
Mamphiswana, D. (2000) ‘Social Work Education in a Changing Socio-political and
Economic Dispensation: Perspectives from South Africa’, International Social
Work 43(1): 21–32.
Mary, N. and T. Morris (1994) ‘The Future and Social Work: A Global Perspective’,
Journal of Multicultural Social Work 3(4): 89–101.
Midgley, J. (1990) ‘International Social Work: Learning from the Third World’,
Social Work 35: 295–301.
Midgley, J. (2001) ‘Issues in International Social Work: Resolving Critical Debates
in the Profession’, Journal of Social Work 1(1): 21–35.
Mokhtar, A. (2006) ‘Indicators for Quality Social Work Education’, paper presented
at the 19th Annual Social Work Conference, Helwan University, Helwan, Egypt,
12–13 March.
Noble, C. (2004) ‘Social Work Education, Training and Standards in the Asia-
Pacific Region’, Social Work Education 23(5): 527–36.
Osman, A., M. Esmael and A. Reda (1985) Introduction to Social Work. Cairo: El
Angilo El Masria Publishers.
Pogge, T. (2005) ‘World Poverty and Human Rights’, Ethics and International
Affairs 19(1): 1–7.
Room, R. and P. Rosenqvist (1999) ‘Drugs in a Global Perspective: The International
Control System’s Best Foot Forward’, Addiction Research 7(3): 177–92.
Sewpaul, V. and A. Lombard (2004) ‘Social Work Education, Training and Standards
in Africa’, Social Work Education 23(5): 537–44.
Soliman, H. (2007a) ‘Social Work Education in Egypt: Challenges and Search for
Modernization’, paper presented at the 20th Annual Social Work Conference,
Helwan University, Helwan, Egypt, 11–12 March.
Soliman, H. (2007b) ‘Is There a Need for a Council on Social Work Education in
Egypt?’, paper presented at the 20th Annual Social Work Conference, Helwan
University, Helwan, Egypt, 11–12 March.
Tasse, A. (2008) ‘Social Work Education in China: Development and Perspectives’,
International Social Work 51(1): 123–4.
Templeman, S. (2004) ‘Social work in the New Russia at the Start of the Millennium’,
International Social Work 47(1): 95–107.
Yuen-Tsang, A. (2002). ‘Tensions Confronting the Development of Social Work
Education in China: Challenges and Opportunities’, International Social Work
45(3): 375–88.
Author biographies
Hussein H. Soliman is Professor of Social Work in the School of Social Work at
Southern Illinois University Carbondale, USA.