moorish americans nationals

aboriginal natural peoples of the land of the america’s

______________________________________________________________________________
public notice, affidavit of truth
for the record, to be read into the record and place on public record.
this affidavit is place on world-wide public record google and scribd.com jakim bey Public Notice
to CHAITONS LLP.
notice to agent is notice to principal – notice to principal is notice to agent.

TO ALL STAFF AT
CHAITONS, LLP
5000 YONGE STREET,10th FLOOR,
TORONTO, CANADA, M2N 7E9

1. to whom it may concern,

this is a lawful Public Notice to all staff at CHAITONS LLP. you are being advise to stop
sending mails to my mailing location. some of your staff, and CHAITONS LLP were
found guilty of conducting fraudulent criminal activities. some of which involve fraudulent
Mortgage claims. furthermore, you do not have any lawful designate mark to address me,
and neither do you a lawful designate mark as a debt collector, which the Supreme Court
has made it clear. further mails, if any, will be disposed.

2. Supreme Court Case Study: The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday unanimously ruled
that foreclosure lawyers are not debt collectors, ending a Colorado man’s years-long effort to
gut the state’s century-old public trustee foreclosure system.
As such, the attorneys representing Wells Fargo Bank in its efforts to foreclose on Dennis
Obduskey’s home in Bailey are not subject to comply with a broad array of consumer
protections mandated by the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, such as proving
the bank actually has the right to foreclose. No. 17–1307. Argued January 7, 2019—
Decided March 20, 2019. Law firm McCarthy & Holthus LLP was hired to carry out a
nonjudicial foreclosure on a Colorado home owned by petitioner Dennis Obduskey. McCarthy
sent Obduskey correspondence related to the foreclosure. Obduskey responded with a letter
invoking a federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA or Act) provision, 15 U. S. C.
§1692g(b), which provides that if a consumer disputes the amount of a debt, a “debt
collector” must “cease collection” until it “obtains verification of the debt” and mails a
copy to the debtor. The 9-0 decision in Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP primarily,
Rule March 20, 2019.

3. 15 USC 1692b. § 804.  Acquisition of location information

(3) not communicate with any such person more than once unless requested to do so by
such person or unless the debt collector reasonably believes that the earlier response of such
person is erroneous or incomplete and that such person now has correct or complete location
information;
Page 1 of 3
4. 15 USC 1692c, § 805. Communication in connection with debt collection

(a) Communication with the consumer generally

Without the prior consent of the consumer given directly to the debt collector or the express
permission of a court of competent jurisdiction, a debt collector may not communicate with
a consumer in connection with the collection of any debt --

5. i do not wish to communicate with anyone at your location. previous emails were
notifications. CHAITONS LLP no longer exist. both the Canadian and the American
Provost Marshal has been notified and commanded to detain those who were found guilty
of criminal activities.

lawful / legal warning to all existing staff.

6. United States Code: Title 18 > PART 1 > Chapter 41 § 876.
Mailing Threatening Communications:
(a) Whoever knowingly deposits in any post office or authorized depository for
mail matter, to be sent or delivered by the Postal Service or knowingly causes to
be delivered by the Postal Service according to the direction thereon, any
communication, with or without a name or designating mark subscribed thereto,
addressed to any other person, and containing any demand or request for
ransom or reward for the release of any kidnapped person, shall be fined under
this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

(b) Whoever, with intent to extort from any person any money or other thing of
value, so deposits, or causes to be delivered, as aforesaid, any communication
containing any threat to kidnap any person or any threat to injure the person of
the addressee or of another, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not
more than twenty years, or both.

7. United States Code: Title 18 > PART 1 > Chapter 41 § 872.

Extortion by Officers or Employees of the United States
Whoever, being an officer, or employee of the United States or any department
or agency thereof, or representing himself to be or assuming to act as such,
under color or pretense of office or employment, commits or attempts an act of
extortion, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three
years, or both; but if the amount so extorted or demanded does not exceed
$1,000, he shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year,
or both.

8. 18 U.S. Code § 912.Officer or employee of the United States

Whoever falsely assumes or pretends to be an officer or employee acting under the
authority of the United States or any department, agency or officer thereof, and acts as
such, or in such pretended character demands or obtains any money, paper, document, or
thing of value, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or
both.

9. 18 U.S. Code § 1621. Perjury generally

Whoever— (1) having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any
case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will
testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or
certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes
any material matter which he does not believe to be true; or`
(2) in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as
permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, willfully subscribes as true
any material matter which he does not believe to be true;
is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined under
this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This section is applicable whether
the statement or subscription is made within or without the United States.

Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3