ma 8 moorish national republic federal government ‘© ~ sorietas republicae ea al maurikanos ~ &* moorish Divine and national movement of the earth northwest amexem / south amexem / central amexem / north gate all adjoining istands the true and be jure natural peaple — beirs to the land > islam ~ @ public notice, affidavit of truth writ of — error international document morocco consular jurisdiction notice to agent is notice to principal — notice to principal is notice to agent. for the record, to be read into the record and place on public record. scribd.com as jakim Supreme Court Case Law; “indeed no more than an affidavit is necessary to make the prima facie case”. (United Stateds v. Kis, 658¥, 2", 526, 536 (7 Cir. 1981; Cert. Denied, 50 U.S. L.W. 2169; S. Ct, March 22, 1982), Cases in Com U stan: I Treaties. Sune 14, 2021 ‘The obligation of a treaty, the su Jand, must be admitted. The of th contract between the i uti itwhere a rT mach binds those rigs, and is by the Si United State v. Tho Schooner Possy, | Cranch, 103:1 Cond. Rep. 256. the publi ted states of america, volum Re: Court file no. FC 15-1742 Ministry of the Attorney General (acting as attorney General) LE Fryer (acting as) Justice Karen Hamilton, (acting as) Judicial Assistant A Jackson (acting as) Clerk of the Court Darren Brunke (acting as) Client Representative Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Family-Division 150 Bond Street, Oshawa, Ontario republic, IL1G 0A2} Phone: 905 743-2800 Re: Misvebresented Instrument — Foreign Bills of Eschange! Bis of attainder styled Judgment made ‘on April OI, 12, 2021, and May 17, 2021 there is no joinder to GARRY BROWNE nor A.KA. JAKIM BEY. affidavit of fact Averment of Jurisdiction — Quo Warranto was issue to [L-E Fryer acting as Justice] and ‘the Family Corporate Court Division om April 12, 2021, at 4:50am, May 17, 2071 at 2:11am, through email, and during hearing on May 17, 202. i did not receive any documentation as prove of jurisdiction or Delegation of Authority from [L.E Fryer acting as Justice] nor the Corporate Court Staff, Clerks or Agents, ‘public notice, tidavit of rath Writ of — error Aboriginal and Indigenous People’ Documents Northwest Amexem/ Northwest Africa / North America “The North Gate/Central ‘AmetemySourthwestAnesen Adjoining and Americana Islands - The Moroccan Eapire - Continental United Stats; ‘Temple ofthe ‘Moon and Sun’ /“Turte Island’: Now Domestic, Now - Resident, Non ~ Sublet; = Moors Murs -Deing the Rightful Helrs and Primogeniture Birthright inheritors ofthe Land.Exhibit: A writ of — error international document writ is void without proof of jurisdiction. U. 449 US. 200, 216, 101, S. Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed. 2d 392, 406 (1980): Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 821). Be [AL CODE Punish i . mE treason is guilty of an indictable offence and gHalN1b ‘* Marginal note:Punishment for treason (2) Every one who commits treason is guilty of an indictable offence and liable © (a)/f6/bs Sentenced 10 imprisonment for life if he is euilty of an offence under © (o)ito be sentenced to imprisonment for life ithe is guilty of an offence under paragraph 46(2)(b) or (e) committed while a state of war exists between Canada and another country, o © (@)tobe sentenced to imprisonment for a term not cxcoeding fourteen years if he is guilty of an offence under paragraph 46(2)(b) or (¢) committed while no state of war ‘exists between Canada and another country. 3 Supreme Court Case Li — Owen. Independence, 100 S.C.1.1398, 445 US 622; Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232. 4 | ls assssesamasaamammaaaimama is 5. ‘They are equally guilty of a crime against the U.S. Government. 6. Supreme Court Case Law: (Gee Rose v. Himely (1808) 4 Cranch 241, 2 L ed 608; Pennoyer v. Neff (1877) 95 US 714, 24 Led 565; Thompson v. Whitman (1873) 18 Wall 457, 21 1 ED 897; Windsor v. McVeigh (1876) 93 US 274, 23 L ed 914; McDonald v. Mabee (1917) 243 US 90, 37 Sct 343, 61 L ed 608. 7. Supreme Court Case Law: Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L ed 370, Federal judges issued orders permanently barring Stich from filing any papers in federal courts. After Judges Robert Jones and Edward Jellen corruptly seized and started to liquidate Stich's assets, Judge Jones issued an unconstitutional order barring Stich from filing any objection to the seizure and liquidation. 8, Supreme Court Case Law: Greene, 71 Cal. 100 [16 Pac. 197, 5 Am. St. Re (IFreeman on Judgments, 120-c.) bile notice, attdavie of rath Writ of ~ error Aboriginal and Indigenous Peoples’ Docaments: Northwest Amexem/ Northwest Africa / North America “The North Gate'\Central ‘Amexem/SourthwestAmesemv Adjoining and Americana Islands The Moroccan Empire - Continental United State; “Temple of the ‘Moon and Sen” / “Turtle Isand': Now - Domestic, Non - Resident, Non~ Subjects = Moors / Maur elng the Rightful Helrs and Primogeniture Birthright -Inberitors ofthe Land,void jud; not to be declared void by a judge 9. Supreme Court Case; Avoid order is void ab inifio and does not have to be declared void by a {juldge. The Taw is established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Valley v. Northern Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 254 US. 348, 41 S, Ct. 116 (1920) as well as other state courts, c.g. by the Illinois Supreme Court in Peoplev. Miller. A party may have a court vacate a void order, but the void order is still void ab initio,whether vacated or not; a piece of paper does not determine whether an order is void, it justmemorializes it, makes it legally binding and voids out all previous orders returning the case tothe date prior to action leading to void ab initio 10. Supreme Court Case; A void order is an order issued without jurisdiction by a judge and is void ‘ab initio and does not have to be declared void by a judge to be void. Only an inspection of the record of the case showingthat the judge was without jurisdiction or violated a person’s due process rights, ot where fraud was involved in the attempted procurement of jurisdiction, is sufficient for an order 1o be void. Potenz Corp. v. Petrozzini, 170 Ill. App. 3d 617, 525 N.E. 24 173, 175 (1988). Iniinstances herein, the law has stated that the orders are void ab initio and not voidable because they are already void. 11. Supreme Court Case : This principle of law was stated by the U.S. Supreme Court as “Courts are constituted by authority and they cannot go beyond that power delegated to them. If they act beyond that authority, and certainly in contravention of it, their judgments and orders are regarded as ‘aullities. They are not voidable, but simply VOID, AND THIS IS EVEN PRIOR TO REVERSAL .” [Emphasisadded]. Vallely v. Northern Fire and Marine Ins. Co., 254 U.S. 348, 41 S. Ct. 116 (1920). Seealso Old Wayne Mut. I. Assoc. v. McDonough, 204 U.S. 8, 27 S.Ct, 236 (1907); Williamson v.Berry, 8 How. 495, 540, 12 L. Ed, 1170, 1189, (1850); Rose v. Himely, 4 Cranch 241, 269, 2L.Ed. 608, 617 (1808). 12. Supreme Court Case : Pursuant to the Vallely court decision, a void order does not have to be reversed by any court to be a void order. Courts have also held that, since a void order is not a final order, but is in effect no order at all, it cannot even be appealed. Courts have held that a void decision is notin essence a decision at all, and never becomes final. Consistent with this holding, in 1991, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that, “Since such jurisdictional defect deprives not only the initial court but also the appellate court ofits power over the case or controversy, fo permit the appellate court to ignore it, ...{Would be an] unlawful action by the appellate court itself.” Freytag vy, Commissioner, 501 U.S. 868 (1991); Miller, supra, Following the same principle, it would bean action for a court to rely on an order issued by a judge who did not have subject-matter jurisdiction and therefore the order he issued was Void ab initio. 13. A void order has no legal force or effect. As one court stated, a void order is equivalent fo a blank piece of paper. 14. A void judgment is not entitled fo the respect accorded a valid adjudication, but may be entirely disregarded, or declared inoperative by any tribunal in which effect is sought to be given to it. It is attended by none of the consequences of a valid adjudication. It has no legal or binding force or efficacy for any purpose or at any place. ... It is not entitled to enforcement ... All proceedings founded on the void judgment are themselves regarded as invalid. 30A Am Jur Judgments" 44,45. 30A Am Jur Judgments " 44, 45. Duc Process is a requirement of the U.S. Constitution. Violation of the United States Constitution by a judge deprives that person from acting as @ judge under the laws ‘He/She is acting as a private person, and not in the capacity of being a judge (and, therefore, has no jurisdiction), 15. no prove of jurisdiction, nor bonding information were receive from Oshawa Court family- division., nor Agents or staff . in the case William B, Stinchcombe v. Her Majesty The Queen. the Grown is obligated to give and disclose full disclosure. The Supreme Court of CANADA made it very clear in the William B, Stinchcombe v. Her Majesty The Queen. [1995] 1 SCR 754 ‘The trial judge on a review should be guided by the general principle that information ought not fo be withheld if there is a reasonable possibility that the withholding of information will impair the right of the accused to make full answer and defence, untess the non-disclosure is justified by the law of privilege. It is difficult to justify the position which clings to the notion that the Crown has no legal duty to disclose all relevant information, The arguments against the existence of such a duty are groundless while those in favour, are, in my view, overwhelming. Public notice, idavit of truth Writ of ~ error Aboriginal and Indigenous Peoplet’ Documents: Northwest Amexem/ Northwest Africa / North America “The North Gate'‘CentralExhibit: B writ -of - error international document 16. in the colorable colfusive action, and void proceeding of case number Court File number FC 15-1742 in the records of the foreign private de facto corporate entity named ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (Inc), a subsidiary of the foreign private de facto Corporation entities named DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (Inc.), and UNITED STATES ( Inc.) / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Inc.), the Respondents, L.E FRYER (acting as) JUSTICE, Ontario Superior Court of Justice Oshawa, Karen Hamilton, (acting as) Judicial Assistant, Ministry of the Attorney General (acting as attorney General), and not limited to, A Jackson (acting as) Clerk of the Court, Darren Brunke (acting as) Court Client Representative, (hereinafter “Respondent” unless expressed otherwise), all being foreign Corporate citizens — subjects under the plausible 14" Amendment U.S. Corporate Citizenship by jus soli, having been duly served with process at their Corporate mailing address (either directly or by and through their principal / Clerk /Agents / Assign) the public notice, affidavit of truth, writ of - error entered in the Case on April 01%, 2021, April 12, 2021, and the public notice, affidavit of truth, writ error entered in the Case on May 15, 2021, and there were no answer or cause to the contrary, and such affidavits stand in record as prima facie evidence, and conclusive proof of the foreign misrepresentation instrument — bill of attainder / bill of exchange title ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO RATIFY share custody filed in the case by Respondents SHAWNNA BROWNE and Agents, A Jackson (acting as) Clerk of the Court, Karen Hamilton, (acting as) Judicial Assistant Darren Brunke (acting as) Client Representative on or before April 01, 2021, April 12, 2021, May 17, 2021, and by THE HONOURABLE. JUSTICE L-E FRYER, (acting as justice), -d with this file hereto being null and void ab inito for lack of ‘{HERMICSRT RNG WANG, it is therefore considered; SRACTeO ARG HAIWORED ‘hat a writ of error be the same es hereby entered against the Responde touch or made any ruling in this Case. it is further ordered and adjudged that the collusive action and any attachments associi and against all who has and proceedings taken under COLOR OF LAW in Case number FC 15-1742 in the foreign ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (Inc.), by all the Respondents are jiuill'and void ab initio for lack of jurisdiction and fraud. 17. Days of Grace to Answer on April 01%, 2021, April 12", 2021, May 17" , 2021 and to prevent any continued unlawful exercise of power under color of law and color of authority which in purview of Peble notes, davié of ruth writ of — error Aboriginal and Indigenous Peoples’ Documents: Nortunest Amexer/ Northwest Aftica/ North Amerten ‘The North Gate'(Central ‘Ametem/SourthwestAmesen Adjoining and Americana Ilands The Merocem Empire -Coodinental United States; ‘Temple of the ‘Moon and Sun’ / Tarte Island’: Non - Domest Non-Resident, Non ~ Subject; —Moors/ Mours- Blog the Rightfal Hers und Primogenitare Birthright -Inberltors ofthe Land.18, FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT. The Fourteenth Amendment of the constitution of the United States. It became a part of the organic law July 28, 1868, and its importance entitles it to special mention. It creates or at least recognizes for the first time a citizenship of the United States, as distinct from that of the states; forbids the making or enforcement by any state of any law abridging the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States; and secures all "persons" against any state action which is either deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process flaw or denial of the equal protection of the laws. Black's Law Dictionary Sth page 785. 19. no more than an affidavit! is necessary to make the prima facie case 20, Supreme Court Case Law; “indeed no more thant an affidavit is necessary to make the prima facie case”. (United Stateds v. Kis, 658F. 2", 526, 536 (7 Cir. 1981;Cert. Denied, 50 U.S. L.W. 2169; S. Ct. March 22, 1982). 21. 18 USC 912. PUBLIC HAZARD BONDING OF CORPORATE AGENTS. areas 7 information constitu insurance fr: and is prim a facie dence and grounds to impose a fi i ir publi i of office. (8 USC.912) 22, 18 US.C. $1621 taken an oath bet tent tribunal, officer, 0 case in which a ora tel aoe sear a so be ast, wily and conto such. any material matter which he clieve to be rf th." 18 U.S.C. 2. 18 U.S. Code § 912.Officer or employee of the United States Wh 5 retends to be an officer or emy acting un ity of th 2. 18 US. Code § 1621.Perjury generally nan oath before a com =f ffi son, it ii as alaw law of ‘the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, foie will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subseribed, is tue, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any maferial matter which he does not belie sor Q)in ion, certificate, cde suction 174 of ile 28, Uae Stats Codes willl abneribes as true an atrial matter shih believe to be true; is and shi Drovided by law, be fined under this tite or imprisoned not more than five yeas, or both. Tis section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or without the United States. 5 ‘who issues a rit, of one not authorized by the Court, is liable: who orders a Sep rinbedo tae acactare Ree a otare Big forts 128. see Bowviers Lnw Encyclopedia Rawles 3” revision Pg. 1182, default 26. failure to reverse all orders made on April @1", 2021, April 12, 2021, May 17", 2021. constitutes and serves as conclusive proof of evidence, and your admission by silence to the collusive proceedings in this case ander Color of Lam, including the alleged orders and judgments Sce Elliot v. Peinol,26 U.S. 328, 3,40 (1828) "( if a court acts without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as rullities. They we not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar toa rernedy sought in opposition to them, even prior to a reversal. they constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments, or sentences, we considered, in law, aS frespassers)"; also, see United States v. Tnrockmorton 98 U,S. 61" (Fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents and even judgments... able notice, affidavit of tra writ of — error Aboriginal and Indigenous Peoples? Documents: Northwest Ameen / Northwest Aftica/ North America / ‘The North Gate/Central ‘Ameren SourthwestAnexen/Adjlning nd Americans alands = The Morecean Empire - Continental United Sates, Temple ofthe ‘Moon and Sen / Turtle Inland’: Non - Domest, Non -Reskent, Non ~ Subject, Moors / Murs Being the Rightful Hers and Primogenitur Birthright - Inbertors ofthe Land,n. allodial compensation invoice the following monetary damages are due by all parties who has participated in the unlawful action. thei ze amount, JUSTICE L.E Ministry of the Attorney General (acting as attorney General) LE Fryer (acting as) Justice $500.99 + Karen Hamilton, (acting as) Judicial Assistant ‘A Jackson (acting as) Clerk of the Court Darren Brunke (acting as) Client Representative ‘Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Family-Division 150 Bond Street, Oshawa, Ontario republic, {L1G 0A2| Phone: 905 743-2800 damages and cost Conspiracy against rights (Title 18 USC 241) $3,000,000.00 - JUSTICE L-E FRYER, (acting as) Justice Deprivation of rights under Color of Law (Title 18 USC 242) $3,000,000.00 - JUSTICE L-E FRYER, {acting as) Justice Perjury generally (18 U.S. C. 1621) $500,000.00 - Karen Hamilton, (acting as) Judicial Assistant ‘Compensatory damages $3,000,000.00 - Darren Brunke (acting 2s) Client Representative ‘Acts of Genocide (18 U.S.C. § 1091) $5,000,000.00 - JUSTICE L.E FRYER, (acting as) Justice Punitive damages $5, 000,000.00 - Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Family-Division Denationalization under 14th amendment $2,000,000.00 - Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Family- ki Fraud and in inducement to fraud $800,000.00 - A Jackson (acting as) Clerk of the Court Entry by false pretenses by (18 U.S.C § 1036) $500,000.00 - JUSTICE L.E FRYER (acting as) Justice Consular cost $60,000.00 , Miscellaneous expenses (mailing, paper, ink, ct.) $5, 0000 ‘Total: $22,565,000, total amount is payable in lawful money gold and fine silver bullion coins or bars, or items of equal value. 28. Criminal Charges, Bonds and Liens parties must all orders against te ithin three (3) days of receiving this affidavit, tenes cruel harea ead cad are wedi! 18 U.S. Code § 241.Conspiracy against rights or de attempt fo kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to com sexual an aa to a, a shall be fined under this title or 18 U.S. Code § 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law ra aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, death, public noice, afidavit of trth writ of — error Aboriginal and Indigenous People’ Document: Northwest Ametem/ Northwest Africa /'North America / ‘The North Gate/Central ‘Amerem/SourthmestAmerem/Adjening and Americana lands - The Moroccan Empire - Continental United State; ‘Temple of the ‘Moon and Sun’ / “Turd Island’: Non Domestic, Non - Resident, Non - Subject; Moors Muu Being the Rightful Heirs and Primogeniture Birthright -Inheritors of the Land.18 U.S.C. § 876 Mailing Threatening Communications: (a) Whoever knowingly deposits in any post office or authorized depository for ‘mail matter, to be sent or delivered by the Postal Service or knowingly causes to be delivered by the Postal Service according to the direction thereon, any communication, with or without a name or designating mark subscribed thereto, addressed to any other person, and containing any demand or request for ransom or reward for the release of an shall be fined under this title or (b) Whoever, with intent to extort from any person any money or other thing of value, so deposits, or causes to be delivered, as aforesaid, any communication containing any threat to kidnap any person or any threat to injure the, of the addressee or ane shall be fined under this title or a right to nationality, and the right to change it 29, Article 15. (1) Evervone has the right to a nationality. ((2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his ‘nationality. United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights 30. Article 6 indigenous individual bi ht to a nationality. ‘The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: 31, the Sth AMENDMENT V ‘except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in j of life or limb; nor shall be 32, THE TREATY OF PEACE AND FRIENDSHIP OF 1786/1836 A.D. Between Morocco and the United States ‘The Treaty of Peace and Friendship — Constitution for North America. A Treaty of Peace and Friendship was established under the authority of Mohammed Ibn Abdullah, the Sultan of ‘Morocco, and seal by his ‘Royal Seal’ in the court of Morocco in the year 1199 — corresponding to 1786 A.D. The Treaty was ratified by President Author St Clair of the United States Republic in the year 1787 A.D., which corresponds to 1200. The Treaty is one of Amity and Commerce between Morocco and the United States of North America, and is referred to as, “The Treaty of Peace and Friendship”. It is the world’s longest running treaty by the Moors. The Treaty is one of Amity and Commerce between Morocco and the United States of North America. Article 20: “if any of the Citizens of the United States, or any Persons under their Protection, shall have any disputes with each other, the Consul shall decide between the Parties, and whenever the Consul uire any Aid or Assistant jernment, to enforce his it granted to him.” Article 21: Ifany Citizen of the United States should kill or wound a Moor, or, on the contrary, if'a Moor shall kill or wound a Citizen of the United States, the Law of the Country shall take place, and equal Justice shall be rendered, the Consul assisting at the Trial; and if any Delinquent shall make his escape, the Consul shall not be answerable for him in any manner whatever. The Treaty is one of Amity and Commerce ‘between Morocco and the United States of North America, the public statutes at large of the united states of america, volume 8 pages 100-105. pubile notice, afdavit of trash Writ of ~ error Aboriginal and Indigenous Peoples’ Documents: Northwert Amexem/ Northwest Africa / North America / The North Gate'Central ‘Amerem/SourthwestAmesem/ Adjoining and Americana Islands - The Moroccan Empire -Confinental United State Temple ofthe ‘Moom nd Sun’ /“Turde Island’: Non - Domestic, Non - Resident, Non ~ Subjects Moors / Murs Being the Rightful Helrs and Promogentture Birthright -tnhertors ofthe Land.33. All Supreme Court Rulings are applicable to ALL States. ‘The United States Constitution, via Art III, Section Murdock v. Penn., 319 US 105 . “A writing is ‘void ab initio” in the case of fraud in the inception, and it need not be formally rescinded as a prerequisite to right of avoidance”. Bonacci v. Massachusetts Bonding Ins. Co., (1943) 58 CA 2d 657,664 68. Suy 7 ee Be Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 945 (9" Cir. 1973} Spevack v. Klein, 385 US. 511 (1967) GARRITY V. NEW JERSEY, 385 U.S. 493 (1967) BOYD V. US, 116 US. 616 (1886) MALLOY V. HOGAN, 378 U.S. 1 (1964) 69. Supreme Cou i Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U. S.Ct. 1401 (1958), (CIS 16, p- 409) n. rt Case; either directly or collaterally, provided thatthe party is properly before the court. Sce Long v. Shorebank Development Corp.,182 F.3d 548 (C.A. 7 Ill. 1999) 72, Supreme Court Case Law: “Ifa court grants relief, which under the circumstances it hasn't any authority to grant, its judement is fo that extent void.” (1 Freeman on Judgments, 120c.) "A void judgment is no judgment at all and is without legal effect." (Jordon v. Gilligan, 500 F.2d 701, 710 (6th Cir. 1974) (Lubben v. Selective Service System Local Bd. No. 27, 453 F.2d 645 (Ist Cir. 1972). 73. Su Law ; A void judgment is not entitled to the respect accorded a valid SMBRBIEIIEE bot may bo cticly disregarded, or doclared inoperative by any tribunal in which effect is sought to be given to it. It is attended by none of the consequences of a valid 30A Am Jur Judgments" 44, 45. tis a fundamental doctrine of law that a party to be affected by a personal judgment must have his day in court, and an opportunity to be heard. Renaud v. Abbott, 116 US 277, 29 L Ed 629, 6 S Ct 1194, Done and ordered at Maghrib Al-Aqsi, Morocco at North America patil node, afidavt of rath Writ of — error Aboriginal and Indigenous Peoples’ Documents: Northwest Amexem / Northwest Aftea/ North America / The North GateVCentral “Amerem/SourthwestAmexen/ Adjoining and Americana Islands The Moroccan Empire - Continental United States; ‘Tempe ofthe ‘Moon and Sen’ /*Turde land’: Non-Domestic, Non-Resident, Non ~ Sublet, Moors Mrs - Being the Right Hers and Primogeiture Birthright Inertrs ofthe Land.affidavit i declare and affirm by virtue of divine law, under the Zodiac Constitution, and upon the United States Republic Constitution of 1791, The Treaty of Peace and Friendship 1786/1836 A.D. between Morocco and the United States at North America, and upon the honor of my Foremothers and Forefathers that true above affidavit of truth, writ of - error is true and correct, Executed this 4 day of __ Zener +2021, a without recourse / non-negotiable ‘mailing location: 262 Ormond Drive, Oshawa, Ontario, (Seal) cited authorities; ~ Treaty right to inherit under Article 22 of the aforesaid Treat of 1836 - Supremacy clause under Article V1, el.2 of the Constitution for the United States of North Americal791 - Diversity of Nationality case under Article 111, Section 2 of the Constitution for the United States of ‘North Americal791 ~ Supreme Court of the United States stated the following Kolovrat v. Oregon, 366 A. $. 787, 191, EL g.CL 922 (1961), "A state cannot refuse to give foreign nationals their treaty right because of fear that Valid international agreement may possibly not work completely to the satisfaction of state authorities ‘Under the supremacy clause of the United States Constitution Art. V1 clause 2, state policies as to the rights of aliens to inherit must give way to overriding federal treatics and conflicting arrangement” ~ Christmas V. Russell, 5 Wall. 302 18 L.B4,475 (“A judgment or record shall have the same faith, credit, conclusive effect, and obligatory force in other states as it has by law or usage in the state from whence taken”) - First Nat, Bank V. Terry, 103 Cal. App.501, 285P336,377 (“ful faith and credit” clause of const, U.S. art 4,sect 1,requires that that foreign judgment be given such faith and credit as it had by law or usage of state of its orgin.”) able notice, aftdavi of rush Writ of ~ error Aboriginal snd Indigenous Peoples’ Decuments: Northwest Amesem / Northest Africa / North America / ‘The North Gate'Central ‘Amexen/SourthmestAmesemv Adjoining and Americana Ilands- The Moroccan Empire - Continental United Stater; “Temple ofthe ‘Moon and Sun’ / “Turd Island’: Non - Domest, Non -Restdent, Non ~ Subjects = Moors/ Murs - Being the Rightful Helrs and Primogeniture Birthright -Inheritors ofthe Land.