1

Studying The Personification of Trees in remembrance of the Difference in Subjectivity of

Humans Whom Battle in Personal Ideas and Beliefs Which They Must Defend When Offended

Considering the personification of Trees quite noticeably metaphorically to the behavior of other

entities it's important to understand development is affected through genes as well as

environment considering an individual's Life Cycle of whichever tree is being compared as an

ideal orientation of the tree collective considering the object of thought an individual may be

comfortable associating with a trees personality without discomfort. The importance spiritually of

a seedling developing succession over time as they develop interpersonal communication and

reactions between tree species closely in proximity to one another, such as through mycelium

and mycorrhizae which is an underground fungus and root system, is much different considering

the communication of people with each other through one-on-one communication or electronics

interconnectedness. Both the tree collective, and human collective have complicated ways of

communication and complicated relationships, however the tree collective communicates more

through exchanging positive and negative nutrients and gasses that they accumulate, as

humans communicate more than abstract ideas, as in complicated ideas, between relationships,

and their orientations of learning, and have more complicated functionings in personable ideas

therefore may be affected complicatedly positively or negatively within these personable ideas

through complicated ideas.

When a colleague of mine was having a conversation with another I happened to listen into

their suggestions which seemed as though they were discussing an abstract concept like radical

acceptance however instead of a specific problem it was a reference to nature in providing

something uncomfortable only to be an individual with thoughts and feelings from bad

boundaries between specific people. However its important to realize this is not necessarily for

each individual a connection into the security of those with mental illness because of the
 2

breaking of boundaries, especially related to cause them distress because within a tree

collective, because they relativity towards trees communication and wellbeing proof towards

weather they have emotions and feelings is non-existent. This individual was specifically using

reference to a blown up balloon of an elephant which may seem bombastic or lacking objective

beauty which don't get me wrong possible to still think subjectively cherish, as long as under the

stance that no boundaries should be crossed for mental health stability, if it would be a problem

for someone considering comparative to an individual they knew whom they related negatively

to or a negative past experience, however because such was avoided it leads to the possibility

to cherish certain subject switch radical acceptance in a comfortable way instead of something

which is dangerously difficult to accept.

The Tempest therapist to themselves and others making certain prompting events leading to

problem behaviors was being overblown about the adorableness of an elephant blown up for

children as something to cuddle up with and that's perfectly fine as long as this individual

listening or reacting hadn’t had a particularly bad experience with someone they resemble with

discomfort like an elephant (please know this is only a metaphor for making a point not

necessarily criticism anyone comfortable understanding thankful affliction with elephant as

synonyms.) [However, it's still important to note besides the fact that if elephants are someones

trigger, they don't see the personality traits within the elephant , and their interpretation of an

elephants life is different then another elephant may perceive another elephant, sometimes

leaving a variability to the comfortable indifference, in all hopefulness, as in each individual

being has its own interpretation as to what beauty is. However that means there's meaning

within the relationship, and different elephants can be affected by other elephants differently

depending on their character and role in the individual's life towards whatever stance or

opportunity available giving that stance, in the idea that each individual is affected differently
 3

from other individuals just like humans]. And in this situation the lady absorbing the therapist

tempest reaction mentioning something in a side note, considering the overall encumberment

the tempest related to such ideas, trying to grasp those individuals around who were an

suggestively unfathomably and somewhat discomforted from the notion to the individuals lady

listening which brought one to a flight or fight state. In this situation it means one can either

ignore what was being said with coping mechanisms and or pleasantly described through the

ladies own metaphor in comeback a readministering of such an abstract idea in not a direct way

however through a passive aggressive means. When a Tempest explains such a statement

sometimes coping mechanisms without interacting can help as ignoring them as valid possible

acknowledged momentarily, considering mentioning something could induce an additional

trigger only a negative person would say with no truth behind it considering them either to be a

devil's advocate in arguing a point, not because of justice however instead just to argue a point

for the sake of arguing the point which is most destructive. This possibly from an irrational

addiction in destruction or even sadistic beliefs which would relate to someone who is quite

irrational as these definitions are so vague that they might as well be considered a euphemism.

So consumer irrational mumbulings or passive aggressive suggestions when negative may be

irrational or when positive rational, however it’s important to understand the difference and the

idea of your own discretion when handling these ideas weather coping mechanism[as not

making the situation worse] in ignoring them and not allowing yourself to be bothered [by not

letting the comments in completely, rejecting them, eventually forget and alow dissipation], or

use passive aggressive techniques as your choice most effective in these situations in

manipulation as protection for loyalty of yourself towards your entranced and abided by thought

process and well being orientation. However, one important note is to not have an angry vibe in

orientation for such levels to consistencies of orientation as broken up and ineffective in

 4

communicating something of value, considering it may be considered over-judgmental, and

offend someone else's beliefs. It’s important to gauge the situation accordingly as in your own

discretion in how such can be brought up or communicating in effectiveness through your own

discretion, and remember each situation is a learning experience, and when possibly your

construction in passive aggression did not lead to the right diction or sentence structure, again

remember it is a learning experience. A common euphemism for this is ​take it one step at a

time​, right, which is hackneyed enough I can't make it any more importantly emphasised as to

some its fathomable of an encouragement however to another its unfathomably unnecessary.

So bear with me here, with hackneyed statements, when the situation with the elephant arose

my first orientation was to just ignore the issue which seemed to be approaching something on

the edge of harassment, because if I said anything with which would come to my awareness

Immediately to say would only be something I’d be put on the spot and felt demeaned if my

mentionings were random leading to some criticism of the elephant, however i was worried that

I couldn't make an effective announcement. Even though however someone who was bothered

mentioning something to not feel it affecting them too terribly some who are juvenile yet

necessary to confess someone may mutter a random comment. However remember it’s only

necessary under your own discretion. So mentioning a plea with someone you feel comfortable

discussing your problems with may be helpful when your coping mechanism isn't working

properly. Whats most effective after gradual crescendo into effectiveness weather in the

moment or a passion to necessity to address the problem by considering it that something

compelling may come to your mind with faith in yourself and your cunningness ability to

remember with discretion know when it's right to hold something in and when its right to be

passive aggressive (with a last resort being non-passive aggressive). When it's all in your own

discretion room your personality and orientation around the subjective case which what stems of
 5

it is opinions from judgment in the mind of previously developed consciousness to know how to

react in certain situations when immediately react when very thoughtfully oriented, or not

immediately react from previously awkward social skills cloud-up evaluation knowledge.

So during the situation with the Tempest remembering the idea of the Elephant being

embraced in verbal language which became a trigger is important to bring those forward ino the

Lady who was listenings availability of reactions of her own modified embrace of Tree

personification. I explained ‘Remembering how you like the outdoors condensing the walk you

lead in the pleasant environment wilderness within your own backyard like a forest playground,

is so inspiring to listen to my compelments as positive as I'd like to explain how I embrace the

observation of trees behaviors and personalities specific to individual trees; considering this I’d

like to explain my comparison of the tree collective vs human kind collective. Individual trees

acquire their own personalities, each and every one of them their vast array of personalities,

and idiosyncrasies is perhaps as vast as the human collective considering the sense of the

various opportunities of sunlight, nutrients environments since genes of purpose (especially)

which their culture within mycorrhiza communication develops their personality. When I study

trees its not exactly standard literary study (however somewhat literary because I write about it)

it's more spiritual as the longer one visibly sees in that sense without even the other four

senses, it's how one visibly observes individual trees as an observation of personalities in

beautiful forms. However what inspires me about the way trees communicate their personality is

how no matter how silly a tree may become because of environment trees are harmless forms

of the species of Mother Nature because they are not connected to subjectiveity of

personability, considering trees leave an unpetrenable idea as the tree collective is nothing

capable of impending the boundaries of morality and subjectivity, however much this judgment
 6

is connected to human individual because of personal penetrablity and subjectivity of desiring

only ceratin other human forms to engage in personability of activity, considering their standards

and the preciously beautiful and respect absorbing morals that belong in a previously

complicated mind of human beings. Human beings are also signaly capable learning socially

important and moralising individuals qualities keeping them strong and unmovable by Evils

subjection to break down their boundaries from manipulation from misunderstanding of Goods

protective qualities and the manipulation from Evil not destruction of whatever idea. [This with

differentiation of what the tree collective is capable of understanding, considering its not exactly

capable of understanding the difference between good and evil, as it just knows, the positive

and negative of potential in growth and development]. The difference between Good and Evil is

Evil is destruction of all positive development before it happens through lies and manipulation

(as well causing prevention and negativity towards helping individuals with mental or physical

pain original caused to them, which in most, not all cases like this, for the individual its success

of evil and it's a failure to good, as to forget the past reasonings of the origin of the harm caused

on them, when generations turn around and it's their decision weather to harm and cause

negativity. The main Tempest believes evil is what's best in orientation for his subject however

this is regardless of whether to be individual feels miserable in how she is being treated. When

evil gets a chance the manipulation of evil is manipulation of what way someone uses their will

and intentions, best for negativity, ill health and the destruction of the world, considering its

intentions in which the most compelling demonstration and manipulates others with their charm.

Evil causes destruction, as the polarity God defends himself and takes care of his young in

nurturing ways as finding enjoyment in the pleasant little things in life as well as can be

successful in life in meaningful relationships supporting each other with positive mind frames

with best intentions. Evil plays devils advocate towards those who can't necessarily handle it
 7

because of fraggle behavioral health, however good can be cunning and defends itself brilliantly

in capabilities, and its neighboring weaker friends from foes, when necessary in defending itself

from those who perform devil's advocate.

Sometimes the most charming and charismatic individual whose character derives from the

charismatic individual, without proper coping skills from understanding of the hazard towards

one best orientation, can still defend themselves from an understanding the orientation of good

vs evil, positive to negative, constructive vs deconstructive. Someone getting themselves in the

wrong position hazardous to physical or mental wellbeing are in constructive opposition of

situation, and sometimes feels like there's no-escape because of the possibilities of those not

necessarily physically dangerous however fiendish individuals out for being a devil's advocate.

Sometimes it is, and sometimes its not completely obvious to know how to verbally remove the

problem from the situation, in constructive criticism, and behavioral interpretation. However

sometimes an individual defensive skills, to the subjects best interest is becoming

deconstructed and instead becomes venomous to others; with the orientation of meaningful

values searching and demeaning communication in interpretation receiving and a failure to

include every deversitizing people. It may be a difficult feat to overcome once someone gets

themselves into a quagmire which is a difficult situation to escape from, through communication

where there triggered, as it's important to have good communication skills in not become a

quagmire from defending yourself and offending someone else. However once one steps over

the boundaries of being friendly to a fiendish individual to a certain range on the gamut of

submission and a range on the gamut of dangerous individuals becoming a threat within the

dangerously contracting non spoken directly [or eventually spoken directly] control factor on a
 8

fearful submission as one begins to feel like their somewhat in a Hobson's choice or going all or

nothing at all because of what's expressive towards the battle in conversation in complication of

Good vs Evil of learning behavior not to be too reckless when shouting the dynamics, or be

quiet. This as they walked themselves in one of weighing out the situation which is dangerous or

suspicious for a moment wishing you were more cautious in the beginning howsoever a moment

latter already taking that first step into action or submission, then using proper coping

mechanisms to deal with the demeaning of opinion [that opinion which needs to be defended]

when it's important not to get yourself involved with an individual in a situation you can't handle,

as sometimes it's best to just walk away.

Remember however in the passive aggressive communication when its passive aggressivly

abusing individuals suggesting something alien in the line in your opposition, in passive

aggressive behavior they can not only be too recklessly blunt and shout out or something out of

like in a simply obnoxious way, with your retaliation of ‘‘what's your problem.’ This for one

because it like a retaliation those who are disquited, may disquiet someone else through their

reaction, and for another because the majority of these situations you’ll be regarded as

immature lacking a point and directing causing embarrassment on yourself. However still use

your own discretion for every situation is unique in its own way in how the react for if you feel

prepared to take because you feel like you have your body armor for the passive aggressive

argument, sometimes its important to vociferate with the most important factor is a backup

confidence that your impendingness is a reasonality backup point while weaving great of

weather you have the backup on your sleeve or not, however the most important key is keeping

your confidence and advocating for it [while remembering with a confident come balls and

assertiveness, and reaction]. When in the situation of an offensive passive aggressive or

 9

aggressive comment in someone else's opinion fairly direct towards you the perpetrator, is

passive aggressive or aggressive in itself, and considering its noticable the direction and opinion

one takes considering their personality and the orientation of conversation, varies considerably

between different personalities.

Someone may be talking in a nonsensical and absurd way without proper reasoning however

sometimes it is smooth conversation of passive aggressive demeaning pressure, however when

its absurdity try and tune in and understand how whatever being said makes no sense to adjust

what's being said towards yourself in a reasonably professional manner. Being immature in any

situation will only give someone else with a more logical considerable comment power over

you, so instead take a step back and tell yourself how whatevers being said has a reality only to

the person making the offense with his orientation of life, and of course defend your opinion.

Perhaps you sense something with a different perception, perhaps with odd goggles on, and

when its personable it’s difficult to try and keep reality; one may see the absurdity of this others

comments directing of the conversation offensive towards an individual however remember you

are not within the personal limits to have them advocating against in yourself, or yourself

advocating against them, unless you or they really find important reasoning involved. Such

considering in reality because everyone faces life with different reality goggles on; even if it

seems somewhat like they are readjusting yourself because a possibility considering the twist

and turns of the conversation. Which is an another competing strategy if these tempests are

referring to you what you must remember is by taking a step back as your putting your shoes on

and adjusting your perception to the sense that it seems as though what's begin said could

possibly trigger someone significantly if they had specific triggers which would be brought up

had these individual or that individual were to be within hearing distance confines have they not
 10

learned proper coping mechanisms, defend the just opinion, in defending the person offended.

Once ones able to listen without subjectivity on oneself as a clinically trained professional [titled

tempest within this article] and instead a subjectivity on what the Tempest or initiator microcosm

world would consist of might be subjective or opinionated in a bent way, which wouldn't

necessarily mean against yourself, and wouldn't necessarily mean they play devil's advocate.

And if the strewedness of viewership leaves you offended it is yourself you may want to

advocate for yourself as an exceedingly as you can towards a new environment or mental

status protected by God with some mental fortitude, [Remember the serenity prayer],

considering it's everyone's right to defend themself, of course with consideration for others in not

offending another individual present. Considering this I’ll conclude with two definitions: one

including to ​dehumanize​ ​which is to deprive of human qualities to make machine like, and the

​ ersonify​ which is to think of or represent (a thing) as a person, as the previous

other is​ p

definition includes when people are passive aggressive or aggressive in an opinionated way

dehumanizing another with a different belief, belittling them, however one must remember a

tree, can not be personified [as the second vocabulary word] in being dehumanized, free from

subjectivity and opinion and offensive feelings and interpretation of the way people interact

around them.