You are on page 1of 1

THEORIES OF PUNISHMENT weapons may well be put off by deterrent

sentences.
Purpose of law : To regulate the conduct if the
society  INCAPACITATION
Purpose of punishment : - Aim : To protect society from dangerous
a) To give some sort of reminder to the criminal as some people pose a serious risk that
society in which if they do the same crime, they should be locked away from society or
they will be punished accordingly otherwise incapacitated.
b) To provide justice to the victims
c) To ensure the harmonious of the country Ways where punishment can be employed to
where offenders are punished and human incapacitate offenders :
rights are protected  Life imprisonment
d) To apply punishment on certain offences  Mandatory minimum sentences
so that law can be imposed effectively  Longer period of imprisonment

TYPES OF PUNISHMENT Others :


S.295 of PC - Police supervision which takes
 RETRIBUTION effect after expiration of the sentence of
- The basis is the right to strike back at criminals imprisonment.
(an eye for an eye or a tooth for a tooth) According to S.296 of PC requires the person
- E.g. - S.302 of PC - death penalty (murder) subjected to report once a month to the police
- Indicates vengeance and also to keep the police informed as to his
 Relieves the need for vengeance of the place and changes in residence.
victim or his relatives and friends.
 The public itself has a need for vengeance.  REHABILITATION
Punishment by state is socially acceptable - Aim : To reform the offender so that he can
outlet for agression. resume a normal and useful role in society.

Hari Ram Seghal v PP Kenneth John Ball v R


Courts have progressed from ‘an eye for an A proper sentences serves the public in 2 ways :
eye’, ‘tooth for a tooth’ justice to protect  It deters others who might be tempted to
society by enforcing justice. try crime
 It deters the particular criminal from
PP v Tan Ah Cheng committing the crime again and induce
The public is entitled to be protected and it is him to turn from a criminal to an honest
not likely to be protected if lenient sentences life
are passed.
Teo Siew Peng v PP
 DETERRENCE The 5 appellants were young offenders guilty of
- Aim : The threat of punishment will deter gang robbery. 4 of them are sentenced to 1 year
people from committing the crime. imprisonment and 2 to 3 strokes of rattan. The
- 2 ways where the society is protected : 5th appellant being a youthful offender was sent
 The offender is deterred from committing to 1 year detention and 2 strokes of rattan in
further crime Sarawak Boys Home School. The appellants
 The punishment of the offender serves as appeal.
an example and a threat to others
Held : The court considered the best chance of
PP v Tan Ah Cheng realising the object of turning the appellants
The court observed that sentence will deter into good citizens in which it could be achieved
others who are like minded from committing by not sending them to prison and whipping at
the same crime. the same time.

PP v Chung Kwong Huah


Deterrence sentences may very well be of
considerable value where crime is planned.
Burglars, robbers and users of firearms and

You might also like