Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Neurology
Jacquelyn L. Bainbridge, Pharm.D., FCCP
Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Department of Neurology
Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
University of Colorado Denver,
Anschutz Medical Campus
Aurora, Colorado
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-403
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-404
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-405
Neurology
10. T.Z. is a patient whose low back pain has been 12. F.M.’s physician would like to initiate low-dose
very difficult to control. You initiated a therapeutic chronic opioid therapy for her neuropathic pain. He
trial with several adjuvant analgesics that resulted would like to start therapy with methadone 2.5 mg
in only a 1-point reduction on the pain scale. The every 12 hours. Which is the best recommendation
pain covers one whole side of his low back and hip regarding this therapy?
and shoots down his leg. You subsequently tried the A. She requires an electrocardiogram (ECG)
combination opioid, hydrocodone/acetaminophen before starting therapy.
5/325 mg, on a scheduled basis, which resulted in B. She is a poor methadone candidate because
some relief. You have followed your clinic policies, of her age.
and T.Z. is on a treatment agreement, which includes C. She is a poor methadone candidate because
treatment goals. However, he comes to the clinic and she is opioid naive.
reports that he tried some of his neighbor’s extended- D. An appropriate methadone initial dose is
release morphine. T.Z. states that for the first time in 5 mg every 12 hours.
more than a year, he was able to get some real sleep.
You are very uncomfortable with this behavior. You 13. D.D. is receiving chronic opioid therapy for a back
are aware that he has also made several trips to the injury. Currently, D.D. is prescribed morphine
ED for intramuscular injections of opioids. Which is extended release 90 mg three times daily. D.D. has
the best next step in his management, according to constant itching. He stopped taking diphenhydramine
the guidelines for managing chronic opioid therapy? in the past month, and the itching has become
A. Increase his opioid dose of the weak opioid intolerable. The attending physician wants to change
by 20%. the prescription to fentanyl transdermal patches.
B. Convert his medication to extended-release Which is the most appropriate starting dose?
morphine by using an equianalgesic dose to his A. 25-mcg/hour patch applied every 72 hours.
current dose of acetaminophen/hydrocodone. B. 50-mcg/hour patch applied every 72 hours.
C. Refer him to an interventional pain specialist C. 75-mcg/hour patch applied every 72 hours.
for further spinal injections. D. 150-mcg/hour patch applied every 72 hours.
D. Refer him to a pain/addiction
management clinic.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-406
Neurology
14. P.W. arrives at the clinic for his 8:00 a.m. 16. Your clinic is designing a protocol for the care of
appointment and, as part of his patient agreement, patients receiving chronic opioid therapy. The
completes his patient evaluation forms regarding physicians have decided they will treat patients
his pain and response to his medication. At his with a remote history of substance abuse disorders.
original visit 3 months ago, he was deemed at high Which would be the most appropriate clinical tool
risk of misusing chronic opioid therapy. Before to evaluate individual patient risk associated with
he is seen by his primary care physician, he has a chronic opioid therapy for these patients during
urine drug screen. He indicates in his questionnaires their opioid therapy?
that his pain is slightly improved and that he has A. CAGE substance abuse screening tool.
been taking his medication. His list of prescribed B. Opioid risk tool (ORT).
medications is as follows: acetaminophen 325 mg/ C. Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients
hydrocodone 10 mg: take 1 tablet every 12 hours with Pain (SOAPP).
for pain (most recent dose before bed the previous D. Current opioid misuse measure (COMM).
night; patient is not taking it every 12 hours, but
only when necessary for severe pain); gabapentin 17. P.V. requires appropriate therapy for his mild to
600 mg three times daily; sertraline 25 mg daily; moderate pain. He currently takes no medications for
hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg; and an over-the-counter chronic pain. Which would be the most appropriate
cough syrup (the nighttime version), the name of first step in therapy?
which the patient cannot remember. The results
A. Ibuprofen 400 mg three times daily for 5 days.
of the urine drug screen are as follows: opioids,
B. Acetaminophen/hydrocodone 500 mg/10 mg:
negative; amphetamines, positive; benzodiazepines,
Take 1 tablet every 4–6 hours as needed for
negative; cannabinoids, negative; and barbiturates,
5 days.
negative. From the urine drug screen results, which
C. Tramadol 50 mg three times daily for 5 days.
is the next best step in this patient’s management?
D. Celecoxib 200 mg daily for 5 days.
A. This patient’s chronic opioid therapy should
be discontinued because of his using inappro- 18. S.S., a 35-year-old patient with chronic low back
priate medications. pain with sciatica, has been treated with opioids for
B. This patient should be rescreened on upcoming more than 10 years. She currently takes the following
visits by using the immunoassay and receive medications: oxymorphone extended release 20 mg
patient education regarding his prescribed every 12 hours and ramipril 10 mg daily. Her only
pain therapy. other conditions are HTN and obesity. She weighs
C. This patient should be rescreened at this visit 150 kg, and her creatinine clearance is normal
by using a more sensitive test, namely, gas for her age. Her current pain level is a 3/10 in the
chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS). mornings, which shifts to a 9/10 in the evening. Her
D. This patient should be rescreened at this visit pain medication slightly reduces her pain level in the
by using serum quantitative screening tests. evening. She describes her pain with words such as
shooting and stabbing, running down the outside of
15. Which drug is most likely to be associated with her leg to her ankle. Which is the best medication to
a positive result for a urine drug screen (enzyme recommend as an initial adjuvant medication for her?
multiplied immunoassay technique [EMIT] point of
A. Pregabalin.
care – immunoassay form) for opioids?
B. Gabapentin.
A. Methadone. C. Duloxetine.
B. Verapamil. D. Venlafaxine.
C. Tramadol.
D. Fentanyl.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-407
Neurology
19. Despite several months of adjuvant therapy, S.S. is still 22. L.L. is experiencing more frequent multiple
in severe pain. Her medication is going to be converted sclerosis (MS) relapses and has been treated with
to fentanyl patches. You explain to the physician that interferon β-1a for 3 years. L.L., who is 28 years
this medication is covered by the U.S. Food and Drug old, is thinking of starting a family in 5 years. She
Administration (FDA) Risk Evaluation and Mitigation indicates a preference for an oral agent. Which is the
Strategies (REMS) program. Which course of action best DMT to recommend currently?
does this program most encourage for prescribers? A. Mitoxantrone.
A. Complete prescriber training to obtain a B. Teriflunomide.
specialized prescribing registry number for C. Dimethyl fumarate.
fentanyl patches to place on her prescription. D. Glatiramer acetate.
B. Complete prescriber training related to fen-
tanyl patches, and provide patient education. 23. P.W. is a 44-year-old man who had a road traffic
C. Complete prescriber training for fentanyl accident 3 years ago, resulting in complete spinal
patches to obtain approved education materials. injury at the level of T4. After the acute episode, P.W.
D. Complete prescriber training, provide patient suffered the associated complications from the loss of
education, and provide a medication guide. motor and sensory function from below the level of
injury, which include bladder dysfunction (requiring
20. A.J. is a 40-year-old man with newly diagnosed an indwelling catheter) and chronic constipation.
myasthenia gravis (MG). He experiences bilateral Today, he presents to the clinic with blood pressure
upper extremity muscle weakness, sagging of the (BP) of 200/110 mm Hg, headache, and nasal
right side of face, drooping of the right eyelid, congestion, indicative of autonomic dysreflexia.
and fatigue. He is given a new prescription for Which is the most appropriate action now?
pyridostigmine today at his neurology office visit. A. He should be placed in a supine position
Which is the most appropriate information to immediately.
provide A.J. regarding his medication? B. He should be given a long-acting antihyper-
A. Pyridostigmine is indicated to help prevent tensive agent and continue with this therapy
the further progression of MG. thereafter.
B. Pyridostigmine should be taken only on an as- C. His indwelling catheter should be checked for
needed basis to prevent the development obstruction and corrected.
of tolerance. D. He should be given an oral dose of lactulose
C. The most common adverse effects include immediately.
abdominal cramping, diarrhea, nausea,
and vomiting.
D. The effect of the drug can be seen only
1–2 weeks after treatment initiation.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-408
Neurology
24. A 71-year-old female patient is being seen in the clinic A. Liver function tests will be required during
for a routine annual visit. As part of the evaluation, the first 12 weeks.
a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is B. The drug will significantly improve the
performed, on which she scores 23/30. One year symptoms of the disease.
ago, she scored 26/30. Her medical problems include C. Adding vitamin E to rivastigmine will improve
HTN, osteoporosis, hypothyroidism, and overactive the efficacy of the drug.
bladder. Her current medication list includes D. Avoid taking medications such as diphen-
hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg/day, lisinopril 10 hydramine or chlorpheniramine while
mg/day, alendronate 70 mg once weekly, calcium/ taking this drug.
vitamin D 500 mg/400 international units twice
daily, levothyroxine 100 mcg/day, and tolterodine 4 27. A 76-year-old woman (height 67 inches, weight
mg/day. Her examination is unremarkable, and BP is 51 kg) has been taking donepezil 10 mg/day for 11
controlled at 132/84 mm Hg. A thyroid-stimulating months and has tolerated it well, except for mild to
hormone (TSH) measurement 2 months ago was 2.2 moderate nausea on rare occasions. She is in the
mIU/mL. Which factor is most likely contributing to clinic today with her daughter, who states that she
this patient’s cognitive changes? is concerned about her mother’s worsening memory
A. Hypothyroidism. and daily functioning. Her mother’s MMSE score
B. Alzheimer disease (AD). today is 15/30. One year ago, it was 19/30. No
C. Tolterodine. evidence of acute medical problems is found during
D. Levothyroxine. the examination, and a depression screen is negative.
Which is the most appropriate recommendation
25. A 77-year-old man with recently diagnosed probable currently to address the daughter’s concerns?
AD (MMSE 22/30) began treatment with galantamine A. Increase the donepezil dose to 23 mg/day.
extended release (ER) 8 mg/day 3 months ago. After B. Decrease the donepezil dose to 5 mg/day.
taking this dose for 1 month, his dose was titrated C. Continue donepezil and initiate
to galantamine ER 16 mg/day, but he was unable to memantine therapy.
tolerate this dose because of nausea; therefore, the D. Discontinue donepezil and initiate
dose was decreased to 8 mg/day. He received the memantine therapy.
8-mg dose for 6 additional weeks without problems,
and his dose was again titrated to galantamine ER 28. A 48-year-old man is receiving care in an inpatient
16 mg/day about 1 week ago. The patient’s wife is rehabilitation setting. He was involved in a motor
calling the clinic today to report that she has not seen vehicle accident 4 weeks earlier and suffered a
any improvement in her husband’s symptoms and severe nonpenetrating brain injury. He has been
he has been experiencing nausea and has not been in a minimally conscious state since entering the
eating well since the dose increase. Which is the best facility. The physician caring for this patient has
management strategy for this patient? prescribed amantadine 100 mg twice daily for this
A. Discontinue galantamine and initiate donepezil patient. Which statement is most appropriate with
5 mg/day. respect to amantadine use in this patient?
B. Decrease the galantamine ER dose to 8 mg/day. A. Amantadine may improve functional recovery
C. Discontinue galantamine and initiate meman- in the postacute treatment phase.
tine 5 mg/day. B. Amantadine has no effect on functional recov-
D. Discontinue galantamine and initiate rivastig- ery in the postacute treatment phase.
mine 6 mg twice daily. C. Amantadine may improve functional recovery,
but at a dose of 400–800 mg twice daily.
26. A 72-year-old woman is going to begin treatment D. Amantadine may improve functional recovery
with the rivastigmine patch for moderate AD. after mild to moderate, but not severe,
Which is the best information to provide the patient brain injuries.
and caregiver?
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-409
Neurology
29. A 64-year-old man with HTN, osteoarthritis, type 31. A 68-year-old woman with recently diagnosed
2 diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency (estimated PD began treatment with levodopa/carbidopa
creatinine clearance [CrCl] 25 mL/minute), and 100/10 mg three times daily 5 days ago. She is
gastroesophageal reflux disease presents to the clinic calling the clinic to report symptoms, including
with symptoms of rigidity in the upper extremities, nausea and light-headedness. She states that her
mild hand tremors, and some changes in his gait. PD symptoms are improved and that her ability to
He takes hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg once daily and get around and function is better, but the adverse
amlodipine 5 mg once daily for HTN, ibuprofen 400 effects are quite bothersome. Which is the best
mg twice daily as needed for osteoarthritis, glipizide recommendation for this woman?
5 mg twice daily for type 2 diabetes mellitus, A. Add rasagiline 0.5 mg/day to levodopa/
and metoclopramide 10 mg four times daily and carbidopa.
omeprazole 20 mg once daily for esophageal reflux. B. Decrease the levodopa/carbidopa dose to
He states that the symptoms are quite bothersome 100/10 mg twice daily.
and that they are affecting his functioning. Which is C. Discontinue levodopa/carbidopa and initiate
the best initial recommendation for addressing this ropinirole 0.25 mg three times daily.
man’s symptoms? D. Change levodopa/carbidopa to 100/25 mg
A. Initiate levodopa/carbidopa 100/25 mg three times daily.
three times daily.
B. Initiate ropinirole 0.25 mg twice daily. 32. A 72-year-old woman with PD has been taking
C. Discontinue metoclopramide 10 mg levodopa/carbidopa for more than 6 years. Her
four times daily. current dose is 100/25 mg, two tablets in the morning
D. Discontinue amlodipine 5 mg once daily. and one tablet at noon, 4 p.m., and 8 p.m. She has
been experiencing motor complications (on-off
30. A 72-year-old man presents to the clinic with a symptoms, dyskinesias) related to chronic levodopa
6-month history of intermittent tremor in his hands and therapy, so her physician added rasagiline 0.5 mg
problems with his gait. He states that the symptoms once daily in the morning to her regimen 1 week ago.
have worsened since his past visit 3 months earlier. She is in the clinic today stating that she is having
Laboratory test results and a computed tomography adverse effects since the new medication was added,
(CT) scan performed at that time were normal. including nausea and involuntary movements, which
Physical examination reveals a resting hand tremor, are identified on examination as dyskinesias. Which
left greater than right, which ceases with purposeful is the best recommendation for this woman?
movement, as well as mild cogwheel rigidity in A. Discontinue rasagiline and change to selegiline
both elbows, left greater than right. Postural reflexes 5 mg twice daily.
and balance assessments are mildly abnormal. A B. Decrease the levodopa/carbidopa dose to
gait assessment reveals reduced arm swing while 100/25 mg one tablet in the morning and at
walking. He states that the symptoms are affecting noon, 4 p.m., and 8 p.m.
his daily life and that he is concerned about his ability C. Discontinue rasagiline and add ropinirole
to continue to work. From his history and physical 0.25 mg twice daily.
examination, he is given a diagnosis of Parkinson D. Add amantadine to levodopa/carbidopa
disease (PD). Which is the most appropriate initial and rasagiline.
therapy for this patient?
A. Benztropine 0.5 mg twice daily.
B. Coenzyme Q10 900 mg daily.
C. Levodopa/carbidopa 100/25 mg three times
daily plus entacapone 200 mg three times daily.
D. Pramipexole 0.125 mg three times daily.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-410
Neurology
I. EPILEPSY
A. Epidemiology
1. Third most common neurologic disorder
2. About 10% of the general population will experience a seizure at some point in their lifetime.
3. Around 1%–2% of the population has a diagnosis of epilepsy.
4. 40 million individuals worldwide
5. 2.3 million individuals in the United States
6. One in 100 adults has a formal diagnosis of epilepsy.
7. One in 50 children has a formal diagnosis of epilepsy.
8. Bimodal distribution of the incidence of first seizure
a. Before 1 year of age (from genetic and perinatal causes)
b. After 65 years of age (from stroke and other central nervous system [CNS] insults)
B. Etiology – Known Causes of an Isolated Seizure; this is inconsistent with a diagnosis of epilepsy
1. Alcohol ingestion
2. Withdrawal of illicit drugs or alcohol
3. Drugs that can lower the seizure threshold or precipitate a seizure
4. Metabolic disturbances (i.e., hypoglycemia)
5. CNS infections, febrile illness
6. Epilepsy is the propensity to have unprovoked seizures repeatedly; the diagnosis can be made after
one episode.
a. Idiopathic: 68%
b. Cerebrovascular disease: 8%–12%
c. Developmental disabilities: 6%
d. CNS trauma: 4%
e. CNS tumors: 4%
f. CNS infections: 3%
g. Degenerative diseases: 2%
h. Other: 1%
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-411
Neurology
C. Pathophysiology
1. Epileptic seizures are the result of excessive excitation of neurons or hypersynchronization.
2. In an epileptic seizure, normal inhibitory synaptic currents and neural networks break down,
allowing neuronal excitability to spread rapidly. This occurs focally in a partial-onset seizure
or globally in a generalized seizure.
3. Clinical symptoms of a seizure depend on the site of seizure onset, amount of brain tissue irritability
and spread, and degree of the impulse.
4. There are several mechanisms by which seizures form; however, most drug therapy is targeted toward
transitory imbalances between inhibitory neurotransmitters (γ-aminobutyric-acid [GABA]), excitatory
neurotransmitters (glutamate), sodium and calcium ion channels, and neuromodulators such as
norepinephrine, serotonin, and acetylcholine (ACh).
5. Prolonged seizure activity, defined as more than 20 minutes, contributes to neuronal injury in
susceptible individuals, typically manifesting in problems with memory.
D. Clinical Presentation
1. International Classification of Epileptic Seizures – Provides a focus on a detailed description of
the individual patient
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-412
Neurology
Symptomatic
a. Evidence of brain damage
b. Known underlying cause
Unknown or undetermined
a. No cause can be identified
Information from: Berg AT, Berkovic SF, Brodie MJ, et al. Revised Terminology and Concepts for Organization of the Epilepsies: Report of the Commission
on Classification and Terminology. July 2009.
B. Structural/metabolic
a. A structural or metabolic problem is identified in which seizures are associated
with the condition
b. Examples of conditions are stroke or infection
E. Prognosis
1. Seizure freedom with AED trials
a. Thirty percent of patients will continue to have seizures with all treatment attempts.
b. Of the 70% who become seizure free, 70% will attain this status with the first AED exposure
(monotherapy) throughout 1 year.
c. Of the remaining 30% of patients who do not have response to the first AED, 13% will become
seizure free when the second AED is tried in monotherapy.
d. One percent of patients will become seizure free when the third AED is tried in monotherapy.
e. If adjunctive therapy is initiated after the first monotherapy is tried, around 26% of patients
will be seizure free.
2. Mortality – Life expectancy shortened for patients with epilepsy
a. From underlying cause of the epilepsy
i. Cerebral tumors
ii. Cerebrovascular disease
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-413
Neurology
b. Unrelated to epilepsy
i. Infection
ii. Heart disease
c. Epilepsy related
i. Suicide
ii. Seizure-related trauma – Drowning, falling from ladders, burns
iii. Status epilepticus – 20% mortality rate for each incidence
iv. Sudden unexplained or unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) – Accounts for 2%–18% of
all deaths in patients with epilepsy
F. Pharmacologic Therapy
1. Choice of AED should be based on the seizure type, patient age, concurrent medical conditions,
organ function, concomitant drugs, and presumed mechanism of action of the AED.
2. First-generation or traditional AEDs (year of U.S. Food and Drug Administration [FDA] label approval)
a. Phenobarbital (1912)
b. Primidone (1938)
c. Phenytoin (1938)
d. Ethosuximide (1960)
e. Carbamazepine (1974)
f. Valproate (1978)
3. Second-generation AEDs (year of FDA label approval)
a. Felbamate (1993)
b. Lamotrigine (1993)
c. Gabapentin (1994)
d. Topiramate (1996)
e. Tiagabine (1997)
f. Oxcarbazepine (1999)
g. Levetiracetam (2000)
h. Zonisamide (2000)
i. Pregabalin (2006)
j. Lacosamide (2009)
k. Rufinamide (2009)
l. Vigabatrin (2009)
m. Ezogabine (2011)
n. Clobazam (2011)
o. Perampanel (2012)
p. Eslicarbazepine (2013)
q. Brivaracetam (2016)
4. Monitoring
a. Bone disorders
i. Recommend DXA (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry) every 5 years
ii. Calcium (1200 mg) and vitamin D (800 international units) supplementation
b. Serum concentrations
i. Use the concentration as a guide to therapy; treat the patient, not the concentration.
ii. Trough concentration is most useful because it negates the variation in absorption.
iii. Measure concentrations when trying to determine a drug-drug interaction (DDI), if seizures
are not well controlled, if the patient is experiencing adverse effects, or if nonadherence is
suspected. It is also useful to obtain a concentration measurement when the patient is doing
well and to use this concentration as a historical control.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-414
Neurology
iv. When obtaining a serum concentration measurement of a highly bound drug such as
phenytoin or valproic acid, it is important to order the testing of a free drug concentration or
unbound serum concentration.
v. If the patient has altered plasma protein binding (e.g., with malnutrition, pregnancy, chronic
hepatic or renal failure, burn survivors), testing of an unbound serum concentration of the
highly bound AED should be ordered.
c. Driving restrictions
i. Every state has different driving restrictions.
ii. Most states require patients to be seizure free for a specific period, confirmed by their physician.
d. Depression and suicide
i. Individuals with epilepsy have a higher risk of depression and suicide.
ii. Class labels state that AEDs may increase the risk of suicide and/or suicidal ideations.
e. Monitor for life-threatening rash
i. Stevens-Johnson syndrome
ii. Toxic epidermal necrolysis
f. Potential cross-sensitivity between agents with an aromatic ring
i. Phenytoin
ii. Carbamazepine
iii. Phenobarbital
iv. Primidone
v. Oxcarbazepine
vi. Lamotrigine
vii. Zonisamide (theoretical based on sulfonamide moiety)
viii. Lacosamide (theoretical based on aromatic ring)
ix. Rufinamide (theoretical based on aromatic ring)
x. Perampanel (theoretical based on aromatic ring)
g. Discontinuing AEDs in the seizure-free patient
i. Consider when seizure free for 2–5 years with a normal electroencephalogram (EEG)
finding while receiving treatment
ii. Single seizure type, normal IQ, normal neurologic examination findings
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-415
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-416
Neurology
AMPA =α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid; CPS = complex partial seizure; FDA = U.S. Food and Drug Administration; GABA =
γ-aminobutyric acid; GTCS = generalized tonic-clonic seizure; IV = intravenous; LGS = Lennox- Gastaut syndrome; ODT = orally disintegrating tablet; PS
= partial seizure; SE = status epilepticus; XR = extended- release.
Comparison of antiepileptic drugs. Pharmacist’s Letter/Prescriber’s Letter 2009;25:250707.
Lacy CF, Armstrong LL, Goldman MP, et al. Drug Information Handbook, 19th ed. Hudson, OH: Lexi-Comp, 2010.
Murphy JE. Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 5th ed. Bethesda, MD: American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 2012.
Potiga [package insert]. Greenville, NC: GlaxoSmithKline, 2011.
Aptiom [package insert]. Marlborough, MA: Sunovion, 2013.
Trokendi XR [package insert]. Rockville, MD: Supernus Pharmaceuticals, 2013.
Qudexy XR [package insert]. Maple Grove, MN: Upsher-Smith Laboratories, 2014.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-417
Neurology
Hydroxylation
30% metabolism
Hydrolysis 60%
metabolism
50 to 200 mg
50 mg twice Renal elimina-
Brivaracetam divided two 200 mg Not established
daily tion (95%)
times daily
Hepatic
CYP2C19-S
<10% excreted
unchanged
Hepatic (inducer/
autoinducer)
CYP3A4-S
IR: 800–1200
CYP2C8
mg divided three
200 mg twice (minor)-S
or four times
daily (suspension CYP1A2-↑
Carbamazepine daily 1200 mg 4–12 mcg/mL
100 mg four CYP2B6-↑
XR: 800–1200
times daily) CYP2C8-↑
mg divided twice
CYP2C9-↑
daily
CYP2C19-↑
CYP3A4-↑
P-glycoprotein-↑
≤30 kg: 2.5 ≤30 kg: 10 mg Hepatic CYP3A4
mg twice daily twice daily ≤ 30 kg: 20 mg 100–300 (weak inducer)
Clobazam
>30 kg: 5 mg >30 kg: 20 mg > 30 kg: 40 mg mcg/L Highly protein
twice daily twice daily bound
Hydrolysis to
eslicarbazepine
Eslicarbazepine 400 mg once 800 mg once 1200 mg once (major active
Not established
acetate daily daily daily metabolite)
Glucuronidation
Renal (90%)
3–6 years: 250 Children: 20 mg/
Hepatic
mg once daily; kg/day
CYP3A4-S
Ethosuximide 6 years and Adults: 500– 1.5 g Not established
CYP2E1
older: 500 mg 1000 mg divided
(minor)-S
once daily twice daily
100 mg three 200–400 three Glucuronidation
Ezogabine 1200 mg Not established
times daily times daily and acetylation
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-418
Neurology
17 years and
Renal (40%)
Lacosamide older: 50 mg 200–400 mg/day 400 mg Not established
CYP2C19 (30%)
twice daily
225–375 mg/day
in two divided
doses (dose –
Hepatic UDPGT
12 years and Dependent on Individualize 2.5–15
Lamotrigine (weak inducer)
older: 25 mg/day presence of other dosing mcg/mL
glucuronidation
enzyme inducers
or inhibitors
– Valproate)
IR 16 years
1000–3000 Renal (66%)
and older: 500
Levetiracetam mg divided twice 3000 mg 8–26 mcg/mL Extrahepatic
mg twice daily
daily hydrolysis (24%)
XR: 1000 mg/day
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-419
Neurology
CYP2E1
(minor)-S
0.25–0.5 mg/
1–3 mg/kg/day CYP2C9
kg/day divided
Phenobarbital divided once or 200 mg 20–40 mcg/mL (minor)-S
two or three
twice daily CYP1A2-↑
times daily CYP2A6-↑
CYP2B6-↑
CYP2C8-↑
CYP2C9-↑
CYP3A4-↑
Hepatic (inducer)
CYP2C9-S
CYP2C19-S
CYP3A4
100 mg three
(minor)-S
times daily; 5–7 mg/kg/day
Individualize CYP2B6-↑
Phenytoin phenytoin can divided one to 10–20 mcg/mL
dosing CYP2C8-↑
be given as a three times daily
CYP2C9-↑
loading dose
CYP2C19-↑
CYP3A4-↑
Highly protein
bound
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-420
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-421
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-422
Neurology
Table 7. AED Interactions, Pregnancy Category, and Drug-Specific Adverse Eventsa (continued)
Drug-Specific Adverse Events
Interaction with Pregnancy
Drug (can be concentration-dependent or idiosyncratic/
HBC Categoryb
less common*)
Ataxia, gingival hyperplasia,* nystagmus, risk of
Decreases efficacy of osteopenia/osteoporosis, dizziness, sedation, rash,
Phenytoin D
HBC systemic lupus erythematosus–like syndrome,* life-
threatening rash*
Pregabalin None known C Same as gabapentin but potentially worse
Decreases efficacy of
Primidone D Same as phenobarbital
HBC
Decreases efficacy of
Rufinamide C Shortened QT interval,* HA, somnolence, rash
HBC
Encephalopathy, knee-buckling, status epilepticus on
Tiagabine None known C
abrupt withdrawal*
Decreases efficacy Renal stones,* word-finding difficulties, paresthesia,*
Topiramate of ethinyl estradiol at D weight loss,* glaucoma,* metabolic acidosis,*
higher doses oligohidrosis*
HBC may decrease the D Tremor, encephalopathy,* pedal edema, hair loss,
serum concentrations (epilepsy); weight gain, pancreatitis,* hepatotoxicity (in patients
Valproic acid
of valproic acid by X younger than 2 years),* parkinsonism and middle-ear
about 20% (migraine) dysfunction (elderly patients)
Irreversible visual field defects,*
Vigabatrin None known C
drowsiness, fatigue, hyperactivity
Renal stones,* paresthesia,* weight loss,* metabolic
Zonisamide None known C acidosis,* oligohidrosis,* psychosis,* rash, life-
threatening rash*
a
Many AEDs can cause blood dyscrasias (decreased white blood cell count, decreased platelet count, decreased red blood cell count), non–life- threatening
rash, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, ataxia, increased liver function tests, hepatotoxicity, psychiatric comorbidities, and sedation to varying degrees.
b
Pregnancy category C: Risk cannot be ruled out because of inadequate, well-controlled human studies. Animal studies have shown a risk to the fetus.
Consideration of risks and benefits of therapy should be assessed before beginning therapy. Pregnancy category D: Positive evidence of human fetal risk.
Information from: FDA Drug Category Ratings. American Pregnancy Association. Last updated June 2006. Available at www. americanpregnancy.org/
pregnancyhealth/fdadrugratings.html. Accessed December 10, 2014.
Genetic testing for HLA B*1502 recommended for those of Asian ancestry.
c
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-423
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-424
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-425
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-426
Neurology
b
Not first-line therapy for women of childbearing age.
French JA, Kanner AM, Bautista J, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of the new antiepileptic drugs, I: treatment of new onset epilepsy: report of the Therapeutics
and Technology Assessment Subcommittee and Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy
Society. Neurology2004;62:1252-60.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-427
Neurology
b
NTE 150 mg PE/minute, can dilute in D W, NS, LR, less tissue necrosis and hypotension than phenytoin, no final filter needed.
Can be administered intramuscularly.
c
D W = 5% dextrose; hr = hour; IV = intravenous; LR = lactated Ringer (solution); NS = normal saline; NTE = not to exceed; PE = phenytoin equivalents.
Albers JM, Moddel G, Dittrich R, et al. Intravenous lacosamide – an effective add-on treatment of refractory status epilepticus. Seizure 2011;20:428-30.
Goodwin H, Hinson HE, Shermock KM, et al. The use of lacosamide in refractory status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care Soc 2011;14:348-53.
Lacy CF, Armstrong LL, Goldman MP, et al. Drug Information Handbook, 19th ed. Hudson, OH: Lexi-Comp, 2010.
Adapted from: Phelps SJ, Wheless JW. Chapter 41: Status epilepticus. In: DiPiro JT, Talbert RL, Yee GC, et al., eds. Pharmacotherapy: A Pathophysiologic
Approach, 9th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2014. Available at http://accesspharmacy.mhmedical.com.hsl-ezproxy.ucdenver.edu/content.aspx?bookid
=689&Sectionid=45310491. Accessed March 2, 2015.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-428
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-429
Neurology
Patient Cases
1. Given his comorbidities, which drug would be most appropriate for K.L.?
A. Felbamate.
B. Gabapentin.
C. Lamotrigine.
D. Phenytoin.
2. As K.L.’s diabetes progresses, his renal function becomes severely compromised, and his physician would
like to avoid renally eliminated AEDs. Given this information, which drug would be best to treat his epilepsy?
A. Topiramate.
B. Lamotrigine.
C. Pregabalin.
D. Vigabatrin.
3. T.H. is a 70-year-old man with a longstanding history of generalized tonic-clonic seizures. He presents to the
clinic today for a follow-up visit after his routine serum laboratory values were obtained 4 weeks ago. His
liver enzyme test values were about 10 times the upper limit of normal. The physician ordered a CT scan
and liver biopsy. T.H. was given a diagnosis of severe liver disease and referred back to neurology for review
of his AEDs. He is currently taking phenobarbital and valproate. Given his new diagnosis of liver disease,
which is the best recommendation for treatment?
A. Continue phenobarbital and valproate; no change is needed.
B. Continue phenobarbital and replace valproate with levetiracetam.
C. Replace phenobarbital with levetiracetam and continue valproate.
D. Replace both phenobarbital and valproate with levetiracetam and pregabalin.
4. J.D., a 68-year-old man, was seen in your clinic today; on leaving, he began to have several seizures lasting
more than 10 minutes. During this episode, he did not regain consciousness at any point. He was taken
to the ED, and the physician there wished to begin intravenous phenytoin. She calls you, asking about
drug information regarding intravenous phenytoin. Which would be best to communicate to the physician
regarding the most appropriated dosing recommendation for this patient?
A. Phenytoin can be given intramuscularly.
B. The infusion rate of intravenous phenytoin cannot exceed 50 mg/minute.
C. Intravenous phenytoin should be diluted before administering to the patient.
D. Intravenous phenytoin can cause tissue necrosis on extravasation.
G. Nonpharmacologic Therapy
1. Ketogenic diet
a. High-fat content, very low carbohydrate, shifts the brain’s metabolism to ketones
b. Best adherence with children
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-430
Neurology
H. Special Populations
1. Pregnancy (to minimize the risk of teratogenicity)
a. Have a pregnancy or contraceptive plan before AED initiation.
b. Careful initial AED selection before contraception
c. Reduce seizure frequency, seizures during pregnancy are harmful to the fetus and the mother.
d. Monotherapy is recommended, if possible.
e. Avoid the high peak and low trough concentrations of AEDs.
f. Folate supplementation – No less than 0.4 mg/day for women of childbearing age with epilepsy
(American Academy of Neurology [AAN]). Pregnant women with epilepsy are considered high
risk; the general clinical recommendation is to supplement with 3–4 mg/day (American Congress
of Obstetricians and Gynecologists [ACOG]).
g. Minimize valproate owing to its highest incidence of birth defects; this may not be possible, so the
lowest dose is best.
h. It is essential that the treatment of each woman with epilepsy be individualized, assessing the risk-
benefit of seizure control and potential teratogenicity of AEDs.
i. Breastfeeding is usually acceptable.
i. Amount of AED in breast milk depends on the protein binding of the drug.
ii. The fetus is exposed to higher AED concentrations in utero than through breast milk.
2. Elderly
a. Consider concomitant medications.
b. Monitor organ function.
c. Monitor for adverse events that could increase fall risk.
3. Solid-organ transplantation
a. Avoid CYP (cytochrome P450) 3A4 enzyme inducers with cyclosporine, if possible.
b. Closely monitor drug interactions with other immunosuppressants.
4. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
a. Seizure disorders are common in patients with HIV, up to 11%.
b. Potential interactions between antiretroviral (ARV) agents and AEDs that affect the CYP system
are common and extensive.
c. Older AEDs may induce the metabolism of ARVs, including the protease inhibitors, integrase
inhibitors, maraviroc, and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, thus lowering their
effectiveness.
d. Similarly, ARVs may alter the serum concentrations of AEDs.
e. Some patients with HIV may be coinfected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis or hepatitis C virus
(chronic infection), which adds complexity to DDIs.
I. Patient Education
1. Adherence is very important.
2. The goal of AED therapy is individual to the patient, but in general, it is to stop the patient’s seizures
with no drug adverse effects. However, this may not be a reasonable goal for all patients.
3. AED therapy is lifelong for most patients, depending on their circumstances.
4. AEDs can be withdrawn under strict guidance by the practitioner when the patient is seizure/aura free
for 2–5 years with a normal EEG finding, single seizure type, and normal IQ.
5. Abruptly withdrawing AEDs without practitioner guidance may place the patient at harm of having a
rebound seizure or status epilepticus.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-431
Neurology
6. If the patient is pregnant or trying to conceive, she should contact her practitioner.
7. Self-monitoring of seizures and drug adverse effects should be assessed by the patient and next-of-kin.
8. Diary for documenting witnessed seizures and drug adverse effects
a. Many of the AEDs cause sedation and can be additive.
b. All AEDs can cause adverse effects, some expected and some specific to the patient – They should
be managed by the practitioner, not the patient.
c. Dermatologic effects – Rashes (e.g., macular papillary) – Call practitioner immediately.
d. Dermatologic effects – Call practitioner immediately – Monitor for life-threatening rash (e.g.,
sometimes may resemble a burn or skin ulceration), which can be located on mucus membranes with
skin lesions (e.g., systemic involvement is generally present – Nausea, vomiting, fever, diarrhea).
e. Mood changes need to be reported to the practitioner immediately, especially depression and
suicidal thoughts.
9. Lifestyle
a. No baths if uncontrolled seizures
b. No swimming
c. No driving if active seizures – There are specific rules in most states about driving.
d. Be careful of stoves/burns/curling irons.
e. No ladders
10. Seizure first aid
a. Never put something in a seizing person’s mouth.
b. Remove items that may cause injury (e.g., chairs, tables).
c. Do not try to restrain the patient.
d. Turn the patient on his or her side once the convulsions stop.
e. Check the patient for injuries.
11. Patient additional information
a. www.aesnet.org
b. www.epilepsyfoundation.org
c. www.epilepsy.com
d. www.drugstore.com
e. www.medWatch.com
J. Practitioner Education
1. www.aesnet.org
2. www.epilepsyfoundation.org
3. AEDs have several DDIs, so it is essential that patients’ over-the-counter and prescription drugs be
screened on a regular basis to avert and manage these interactions.
a. Some notorious DDIs are between the enzyme-inducing AEDs (e.g., phenobarbital, phenytoin,
carbamazepine, and, to a lesser extent, topiramate and oxcarbazepine at higher doses – Not an
exhaustive list) and hormonal contraception, HIV, tuberculosis, solid-organ transplant drugs,
cholesterol-lowering agents, drugs used for HTN, warfarin, and so forth.
b. Drug interactions can also occur with enzyme-inhibiting drugs such as valproic acid – Serum
concentrations of other drugs will be increased.
c. Drug interactions can occur because of protein-binding displacement (e.g., two highly protein-
bound drugs – Phenytoin and valproic acid).
d. Drug interactions can occur in the uridine diphosphate glucuronyltransferase system as well (e.g.,
valproic acid).
e. Drug interactions may occur in the P-glycoprotein system (e.g., efflux pump).
4. It is essential that unexpected adverse reactions be reported on a MedWatch form to the FDA.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-432
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-433
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-434
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-435
Neurology
II. HEADACHE/MIGRAINE
A. Epidemiology
1. Headache
a. Very common
b. 45 million people in the United States regularly experience headache.
c. Costly and time-consuming
d. Poor use of EDs and health care resources
2. Migraine
a. 28 million Americans – 21 million women, 7 million men
b. In around 50% of patients, the problem is severe and disabling.
c. Often not diagnosed or treated appropriately
3. Tension-type headache
a. Self-reported in 69% of male individuals and 88% of female individuals
b. Most common of the primary headache disorders, with a lifetime prevalence of 30%–78%
c. Often begins in the early 20s
4. Cluster headache
a. Affects about 200 individuals in 100,000
b. Occurs predominantly in patients older than 30 years
c. Affects male individuals more than female individuals 6:1
B. Types of Headache
1. Primary headaches
a. Cluster headache
b. Tension-type headache
c. Migraine
i. With aura
ii. Without aura
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-436
Neurology
2. Secondary headaches
a. Head trauma
b. Vascular disorder
c. Nonvascular disorders
d. Toxic substances
e. Non-cephalic infection
f. Metabolic disorders
g. Disorders of face and neck
h. Cranial neuralgias
3. Medication-overuse headache
a. “Rebound headache” caused by frequent use of headache medications
b. Withdrawal symptoms on discontinuation of offending drug
i. Offending agents
(a) Analgesics – Especially combination products with caffeine
(b) Ergotamines
(c) Caffeine
(d) Opioids
(e) Triptans
(f) Barbiturates – Especially combination products
ii. Limit use to two or three times weekly for abortive therapy.
c. Toxic effects from medications
d. Escalating use of medications, increasing quantity or severity of headaches, dependence
on and habituation to symptomatic management
C. Cluster Headache
1. Clinical presentations
a. Sudden onset, excruciating, stabbing quality
b. Unilateral location with facial pain
c. Restlessness
d. Often, an attack occurs within 90 minutes of falling asleep
e. Can occur up to eight times within a 24-hour period
f. Typically, no long-term consequences
g. Occur in clusters for weeks to months; then a remission of months to years
2. Treatment options
a. Nonpharmacologic therapy
i. Avoid triggers.
(a) Vasodilators
(b) Alcohol
(c) Bright lights/glare
(d) Stress
ii. Avoid volatile substances.
(a) Gasoline
(b) Oil-based paint
iii. Medications to avoid: Acetazolamide
iv. Cold compress/cold air
v. Trigeminal ganglion procedures (refractory conditions with unilateral attacks)
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-437
Neurology
b. Pharmacologic therapy
i. Acute treatment
(a) Oxygen 6–12 L/minute for 15–20 minutes or 100% oxygen at 7–10 L/minute for 15–30
minutes by non-rebreather face mask
(b) Serotonin agonists
(1) Preferred as first-line therapy
(2) Triptans – Use intranasally or as injectable forms (injectable forms more effective).
(c) Ergotamines: Slow onset of action limits usefulness (no controlled trials support use).
(d) Intranasal lidocaine
(1) Sumatriptan nonresponder
(2) Contraindication to triptans
ii. Preventive treatment
(a) Short term (if patient can anticipate attacks [e.g., seasonal changes, stressful events])
(1) Corticosteroids (burst): Once yearly
(2) Methysergide (episodic)
(A) Young with low cardiovascular risk
(B) Risk of retroperitoneal and pulmonary fibrosis with use
(3) Ergotamines
(b) Long term
(1) Verapamil: Drug of choice for prolonged cluster headaches
(A) Effective in 70% of patients and usually seen after 1 week
(B) 240–960 mg/day for episodic and chronic cluster headaches
(2) Lithium
(A) More effective in chronic cluster headaches than in episodic (78% vs. 63%)
(B) Unknown mechanism of action
(C) Efficacy usually seen in 1 week.
(D) Use the least effective dose, typically 600–900 mg/day in divided doses.
(E) Target serum concentrations of 0.4–0.8 mEq/L
(F) Obtain serum concentrations during first week and occasionally thereafter.
(3) AEDs (gabapentin, topiramate, valproic acid): Can use with triptans
(4) Melatonin 10 mg/day
(5) Combination therapy often required (verapamil and lithium or verapamil
and topiramate)
D. Tension-Type Headache
1. Clinical presentation
a. Attacks on 15 days/month or more (180 days/year)
b. Dull and band-like pain
c. Bilateral
d. No nausea/vomiting or aura
e. Mild photophobia or phonophobia rarely reported
2. Treatment options
a. Nonpharmacologic therapy
i. Stress management
ii. Relaxation therapy
iii. Biofeedback
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-438
Neurology
E. Migraine
1. Pathophysiology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-439
Neurology
2. Clinical presentation
a. Migraine without aura: At least five attacks fulfilling the following:
i. Headache lasting 4–72 hours
ii. Headache has two of the following:
(a) Unilateral location
(b) Pulsating quality
(c) Moderate or severe intensity
(d) Aggravated by routine physical activity
iii. During headache, at least one of the following symptoms:
(a) Nausea and/or vomiting
(b) Photophobia
(c) Phonophobia
b. Migraine with aura – At least two attacks fulfilling three or more of the following:
i. At least one fully reversible aura symptom
(a) Usually visual symptoms
(b) Commonly affects half the visual field
(c) Can include flashing lights (photopsia), zigzag pattern derived from an arc of light that
may enlarge (fortification spectrum), scintillating scotoma that usually begins as a spot
of flickering light in the center of the visual field, preventing vision within the area, and
decreased/loss of vision in half the visual field (hemianopsia)
(d) Sensory symptoms can include paresthesias or numbness.
(e) Motor symptoms can include weakness and aphasia.
ii. At least one aura symptom developing gradually throughout 4 minutes or two symptoms in
succession
iii. No aura symptom lasting more than 60 minutes
iv. Migraine headache follows aura within 60 minutes.
Patient Cases
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-440
Neurology
3. Treatment options
a. Nonpharmacologic therapy: Relaxation training
i. Thermal biofeedback
ii. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)
iii. Acupuncture
iv. Electrical nerve stimulation
v. Cervical spine manipulation
vi. Exercise
vii. Sleep hygiene
b. Pharmacologic therapy
i. Abortive
(a) Because of differences between patients in frequency, duration, and disability of migraine
headaches, selection of agents is based on the level of disability and patient-specific
characteristics. See Table 14 for options.
(1) NSAIDs, aspirin, and acetaminophen are practical choices for mild to moderate
attacks (no more than three times weekly for NSAIDs and aspirin).
(2) Narcotics should be reserved for those with moderate to severe attacks for whom
other methods are contraindicated.
(3) Migralex (aspirin 500 mg with buffered magnesium), which is not FDA label
approved and is sold online, is used for some patients with migraine, tension-type
headaches, sinus headaches, menstrual headaches, exertion headaches, and sex
headaches. (Because it is not FDA label approved, it is difficult to recommend this
therapy; however, pharmacists may come across it in practice.)
(4) Metoclopramide is listed as an antiemetic; however, it often has efficacy on the
headache pain as well.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-441
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-442
Neurology
(b) Ergotamines/dihydroergotamines
(1) Affect several receptors
(2) Less specific to targeted receptor(s), thus causing more adverse effects
(3) Antiemetics given before injectable therapy
(c) Triptans
(1) Select the agent according to all relevant patient characteristics (e.g., disease states,
current medications, duration of migraine).
(2) If patient is experiencing nausea or vomiting, a non–oral triptan should be used (e.g.,
orally disintegrating tablet or injection).
(3) Sumatriptan needle-free delivery system (e.g., Sumavel Dose Pro) uses a burst of air to
deliver the drug just under the skin, and it should only be given in the stomach or thigh.
(4) Sumatriptan SC autoinjection (e.g., Alsuma and Imitrex): Administer in the lateral
thigh or upper arm; the autoinjector is for single use only.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-443
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-444
Neurology
Patient Cases
9. R.P. states that because of the nausea, she would prefer not to swallow a tablet. Which would be the best
abortive therapy for R.P.?
A. Almotriptan.
B. Frovatriptan.
C. Naratriptan.
D. Rizatriptan.
10. R.P. was given a prescription for eletriptan 20 mg at the onset of migraine. R.P. often flies out of the country
for business and has noticed that eletriptan does not last long enough for the migraine to be fully aborted.
Which agent would be the most appropriate choice for R.P. on long flights?
A. Almotriptan.
B. Frovatriptan.
C. Rizatriptan.
D. Sumatriptan.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-445
Neurology
Level A: Agents are established as effective and “should be offered for migraine prevention.”
Level B: Agents are “probably effective and should be considered for migraine prevention.”
Level C: Medications are “possibly effective and may be considered for migraine prevention.”
Level U: Agents have evidence that is conflicting or inadequate to support or refute their use.
4. Special populations
a. Pregnancy
i. Recommend acetaminophen as first-line therapy.
ii. Nonresponders may try combination therapy (acetaminophen/metoclopramide,
acetaminophen/codeine)
b. Children
i. Older than 6 years: Ibuprofen and acetaminophen may be used.
ii. Older than 12 years: Sumatriptan nasal spray may be used.
iii. Conflicting data regarding oral triptans in children
5. Patient education
a. Routes of administration – Intramuscularly, subcutaneously, orally, nasally, or needle-free injection
i. Use products at onset of headache (see Table 13 and Table 14).
ii. For detailed patient instructions, see package inserts.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-446
Neurology
b. Triggers
i. Stress
ii. Hormones in women
iii. Lack of or excess sleep
iv. Alcohol
v. Food (aged cheese, caffeine, cultured dairy, processed meats)
c. Monitoring
i. Adverse events (flushing, sweating, chest pain)
ii. Response to the drug(s) (headache diary)
iii. Headache relief at 2, 4, and 24 hours
iv. Keep a drug and trigger diary.
d. Useful resources: www.achenet.org
6. Practitioner education
a. www.aan.com
b. www.neurology.org/content/78/17/1337.full.pdf+html
7. Conclusions
a. Migraine is a widespread, serious health problem.
b. Only 38% of all migraineurs have been given a diagnosis.
c. Absenteeism and diminished productivity incur a considerable economic burden.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-447
Neurology
III. PAIN
A. Epidemiology
1. Pain is a pervasive and costly problem in the United States.
a. Around 46 million Americans undergo inpatient surgical procedures each year and experience
acute surgical pain, and an estimated 100 million adults have a chronic pain condition.
b. Survey conducted by National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) in 2009, as reported by adults
18 years and older on causes of chronic pain (preceding 3 months):
i. Severe headache or migraine (16.1%)
ii. Low back pain (28.1%)
iii. Neck pain (15.1%)
iv. Knee pain (19.5%)
v. Shoulder pain (9.0%)
vi. Finger pain (7.6%)
vii. Hip pain (7.1%)
c. Chronic pain rates are anticipated to continue to rise because of myriad factors (e.g., aging
population, prevalence of obesity, shift toward ambulatory surgical procedures, progress in
lifesaving measures for catastrophic injuries, increased access to care).
d. Annual cost of chronic pain estimated at $560–$635 billion
e. About 3.2% of the total workforce experienced a loss in productive time during a 2-week period
because of back pain.
B. Pathophysiology
1. Classification: Four primary types of pain
a. Nociceptive (somatic/visceral): Sensory experience of acute pain caused by a noxious stimulus
b. Inflammatory: Tissue damage beyond nociceptive defense system, leading to inflammation
c. Neuropathic: Arises from lesions to peripheral or CNS
d. Functional: Pain caused by abnormal responsiveness of the nervous system in the absence
of a detectable neurologic deficit
2. Mechanisms of pain
a. Nociception
i. Transduction: Process by which external noxious stimuli are converted to electrophysiologic
activity in the peripheral terminals of nociceptors (pain receptors). These may differ for
different painful conditions. In each situation, neurotransmitters and ions are released,
including the following:
(a) Serotonin
(b) Norepinephrine
(c) Bradykinin
(d) Prostaglandin
(e) Histamine
(f) Substance P
(g) Neurokinin
(h) Potassium and hydrogen
ii. Transmission: Process by which pain signals ascend through the spinothalamic tract
iii. Perception: Process that occurs in the cortex, allowing an awareness of the experience of pain
b. Peripheral sensitization
i. Inflammatory-associated changes after tissue injury in the environment of the nerve fiber
ii. “Inflammatory soup,” which includes endothelin, prostaglandin E, leukotrienes, bradykinin,
cytokines, and serotonin; adrenaline is released, resulting in enhanced excitability
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-448
Neurology
c. Central sensitization
i. Amplification of pain signals after repeated noxious stimuli from peripheral nociceptors
ii. This process is thought to explain pain syndromes such as phantom limb pain, reflex
sympathetic dystrophy, and hyperalgesia.
d. Modulation: Process of modification of pain signals that occurs throughout the
ascending and descending pathway. Endogenous systems of modulation include
inhibitory neurotransmitters/receptors.
i. Endogenous opioids
ii. Blockade of NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate)
iii. Serotonin
iv. γ-Aminobutyric acid
e. Neuropathic and functional pain
i. Neuropathic pain (e.g., postherpetic neuralgia, diabetic neuropathy): Additional mechanistic
processes include ectopic excitability, structural reorganization, decreased inhibition.
ii. Functional pain (e.g., FM, irritable bowel syndrome, sympathetic induced pain):
Central sensitization
3. Definitions related to pathophysiology
a. Allodynia – Presence of pain from stimuli that are not normally painful. Example: A patient with
diabetes who experiences pain when placing socks on feet
b. Hyperalgesia – Normal painful stimuli produce exaggerated pain responses in patients with
peripheral or central sensitization.
Example: An immunization in the deltoid muscle causes patients to experience extreme pain for
many days, preventing them from lifting their arm; the injection site has no obvious erythema or
signs of an injection site reaction.
4. Chronic versus acute pain
a. Acute pain
i. Pain is typically a result of an acute disease process (may be part of a mixed
disease process – Acute or chronic); as part of a disease process, acute pain is typically
managed as a symptom.
ii. Pathophysiology is primarily inflammatory.
iii. Treatment goals include cessation of pain or substantial relief.
iv. Anticipatory anxiety may be involved; patients are worried that pain will worsen or
that pain will reoccur when medication wears off.
b. Chronic pain
i. A physiologic cause may not be determinable. Chronic pain should be managed as an
independent disease state with a monitoring and treatment plan apart from other plans.
ii. Most types of chronic pain are mixed—Somatic and neuropathic.
iii. Treatment goals include a reduction in pain and an improved quality of life. Patients with
chronic pain do not usually achieve remission of their pain. A discussion between the health
care provider and patient should involve realistic expectations regarding goal setting.
iv. Anxiety and depression are often comorbidities with chronic pain. Most patients develop a
tolerance to and dependence on medications. Estimates for the incidence of depression in
patients with chronic pain range from 30% to 50% according to the International Association
for the Study of Pain.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-449
Neurology
Patient Case
11. A 45-year-old woman is seen in the clinic on a regular basis. Her medical history includes FM, arthritis,
constipation, and diabetes. Her chief concern today is severe pain in her shoulder, which is 10/10. The pain
is not believed to be cardiac in origin after undergoing an ECG and physical examination. The pain is worse
when the shoulder is manipulated. She rates it a 9/10. The nurse tells you and the physician that it cannot be
that bad—her BP is normal (130/80 mm Hg), and her HR is 90 beats/minute. Which is the best response to
give the nurse?
A. Patients with chronic pain may not have alterations in their BP and HR.
B. The patient is misrepresenting her pain, which should be documented in her chart.
C. Patients have different thresholds of response to pain—hers may be higher.
D. We have to believe what patients tell us about their pain.
C. Approach to Treatment
1. Key principles from the World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder (Figure 2)
a. Oral administration of analgesics whenever possible
b. Analgesics should be given at regular intervals.
c. Analgesics should be given according to pain intensity, as measured by a pain scale.
d. Individualize the dose of analgesics.
Prescription for analgesics should provide sufficient details for proper administration.
2. Adaptation of WHO analgesic ladder to guide treatment options (Figure 3)
3. Approach based on diagnosis
a. Acute pain
i. Patients should be assessed for the physiologic source of their pain and, after reasonable
efforts, be treated for the underlying cause. Pain management should include an assessment
of pain severity.
ii. Considerations for managing acute pain
b. Chronic pain
i. Arthritis
ii. Fibromyalgia
iii. Chronic back pain
iv. Neuropathy
Weak opioid
with nonopioid
If pain persists or increases
(with or without adjuvants)
Nonopioid
(with or without adjuvants)
Figure 2. Adapted from: World Health Organization analgesic ladder for treating cancer pain.
Vargas-Schaffer G. Is the WHO analgesic ladder still valid: twenty-four years of experience. Can Fam Physician 2010;56:514-7.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-450
Neurology
Step 4
Neurosurgical
procedures Nerve block
Epidurals
Acute pain Step 3 PCA pump
Chronic pain without control Neuroliric block therapy
Strong opioids Spinal stimulators
Acute crisis of chronic pain
Medhadone
Step 2 Oral administration
Transermal patch
Weak opioids
Chronic pain
Non-malignant pain
Step 1
Cancer pain
Nonopioid NSAIDs
analgesics (with or without adjuvants
NSAIDs at each step
Mild
Moderate
D. Fibromyalgia
1. Diagnostic criteria (American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 2010):
a. Widespread pain index (WPI) of 7 or greater* and symptom severity (SS) score** of 5 or greater,
or patients may have a lower WPI (3–6) if SS score is greater than 9
b. Symptoms have been present for greater than 3 months.
c. There is no other diagnostic explanation for the pain/symptoms.
*WPI – Number of anatomic areas with pain – Scale ranges from 0 to 19.
**SS – Patients are rated from 0 to 3 on fatigue, cognitive symptoms, waking unrefreshed, and
somatic symptoms. The final score is from 0 to 12.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-451
Neurology
2. Pharmacotherapy
a. Tramadol is recommended for the management of moderate to severe pain in FM.
b. Simple analgesics such as acetaminophen and other weak opioids can also be considered in the
treatment of FM. However, corticosteroids and strong opioids are not recommended.
c. Antidepressants: Amitriptyline, fluoxetine, duloxetine, milnacipran; reduce pain and often improve
function; therefore, they are recommended for the treatment of FM.
d. Pramipexole and pregabalin reduce pain; they are recommended for the treatment of FM.
3. Nonpharmacologic therapy
a. Heated pool treatment with or without exercise is effective in FM.
b. Trials show that patient-specific exercise programs, including aerobic exercise and strength
training, can be beneficial to some patients with FM. However, these should be undertaken with
supervision to increase adherence and prevent injuries.
c. CBT may be of benefit to some patients with FM. CBT has the strongest level of evidence among
the nonpharmacologic therapy options in the current guidelines. There is also literature to support
the use of guided relaxation, rehabilitation, physiotherapy, and psychological therapy.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-452
Neurology
Patient Cases
12. Which topic is most important for L.L. to receive education on?
A. L.L. should be educated about osteoarthritis and the importance of daily exercise.
B. L.L. should be educated about FM and the importance of daily exercise.
C. L.L. should be educated about insomnia and the importance of sleep hygiene.
D. L.L. should be educated about chronic pain and the importance of self-care (i.e., exercise and sleep).
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-453
Neurology
13. While L.L. is at the clinic, you recommend that she begin therapy for her chronic pain disorder. Which is the
most appropriate initial therapy for her pain?
A. She should begin chronic opioid therapy with a trial of hydrocodone/acetaminophen 5/325 mg.
B. She should begin a trial of tramadol 50 mg after discontinuing sertraline.
C. She should begin a trial of duloxetine 60 mg after discontinuing sertraline.
D. She should begin a trial of pregabalin 150 mg in addition to her current medications.
14. T.D., a 42-year-old patient with a history of chronic low back pain, obesity, and diabetes, calls the clinic
today. He says his medications are not helping with his pain. He currently takes meloxicam 15 mg daily and
cyclobenzaprine 10 mg daily. Today, he states that he cannot get out of bed because his right leg is completely
numb from hip to toes. T.D. has never experienced this type of symptom before. Which is the best course of
action for this patient?
A. Recommend that T.D. be referred to an interventional pain specialist.
B. Recommend that T.D. be referred for immediate evaluation of his back pain.
C. Recommend that T.D. be referred to an orthopedic specialist for evaluation of his back pain.
D. Recommend that T.D. be referred to a pain specialist for chronic opioid therapy.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-454
Neurology
c. Manufacturers are required to provide these programs for extended-release morphine, extended-
release oxycodone, methadone, buprenorphine, tapentadol, fentanyl, oxymorphone, and
hydromorphone. Several opioid manufacturers have provided class-wide REMS programs,
which serve as universal education for a group of medications such as the fentanyl products—
Transmucosal and immediate release. These programs are intended to increase provider and patient
use of a consistent education source and reduce confusion.
3. Guidelines for opioid use in chronic pain
a. American Pain Society and American Academy of Pain Medicine: Clinical Guidelines for the Use
of Chronic Opioid Therapy in Chronic Noncancer Pain (2009)
b. Federation of State Medical Boards – Model Policy on the use of opioid analgesics in the
treatment of chronic pain (2013)
c. Washington State Agency Medical Directors’ Group (AMDG) – Interagency Guideline on Opioid
Dosing for Chronic Non-cancer Pain (2010)
4. Evaluation of patients for appropriate use. Complete medical history and physical examination,
including an assessment of pain severity, to be documented in the medical records at each clinic visit.
a. Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
i. 10-cm line – Patients indicate what point on the line corresponds to their pain intensity –
Yields a number from 0 to 100
ii. This scale may be difficult for some patients to understand.
iii. Pain numeric rating scale: 0–10 – Patients rank their pain. Most commonly used evaluation
tool. Patients can become desensitized to this tool—“Always a 10.”
b. Brief Pain Inventory
i. Patients indicate on a diagram of the body where they experience pain.
ii. Patients also rate the severity of their pain and the relief they obtain from currently prescribed
agents. This tool requires the patient to have a higher reading level.
iii. Good for ongoing monitoring
c. McGill Pain Questionnaire
i. Patients are asked to rate their pain and then choose descriptor words for their pain.
ii. This tool requires the patient to have a higher reading level.
iii. Good for initial evaluation
5. History should include the following:
a. Past medications – Reasons for discontinuation and degree of efficacy
b. Current medications – Level of efficacy and any adverse effects. Current level of pain relief using
the appropriate pain assessment tool
c. Presence of clear indication for the use of chronic opioid therapy as opposed to other therapy
d. Social history including family support, occupational status and work activities, use of alcohol and
over-the-counter/illicit medications
6. Suitability for chronic opioid therapy should be evaluated.
a. Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain (SOAPP)
i. Five-, 14-, or 24-question tool completed by patients to classify them as being at high,
medium, or low risk of misusing opioids
ii. High-risk patients
iii. Should have exhausted all other therapeutic options before opioid initiation
iv. Opioid should be initiated with strict protocols including urine drug screening and regular
counseling—May consider an addiction/pain management specialist
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-455
Neurology
Table 18. Testing Methods Available for Patient Monitoring of Chronic Opioid Therapy
Test Advantages Disadvantages
Less expensive May not detect all medications in
Urine immunoassay Longer detection window than serum testing class (e.g., synthetic opioids)
Less invasive than serum testing More false positives than GC-MS
More precise results
Urine GC-MS Costly
Longer detection window than serum testing
Shows results for metabolites
In patient taking high dose, may detect aberrant
Quantitative serum
metabolism pattern Costly
testing
Provides documentation for provider of serum
concentrations
GC-MS = gas chromatography–mass spectrometry.
Patient Case
15. The quality management team for your practice wants to implement a protocol for monitoring all patients
receiving chronic opioid therapy. The team wants you to evaluate the available patient monitoring laboratory
tests and choose the best test for the preliminary screening of patients. The team would ideally like a test
that could screen for most opioids prescribed in the practice, including fentanyl patches, methadone, and
controlled-release forms (oxycodone and morphine). Which test would be best to recommend for the protocol?
A. Urine immunoassay – EMIT.
B. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry.
C. Serum quantitative screening test.
D. Saliva testing.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-456
Neurology
Patient Case
16. A patient is being evaluated for initial therapy with chronic opioid therapy. She will initially be seen on a
weekly basis. Her physician would like to determine her risk level for opioid therapy to help design her plan
for therapy. She has no history of substance use. The physician is more comfortable with completing the risk
tool during his examination/interview. Which tool is most appropriate for this situation?
A. Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain (SOAPP).
B. Diagnosis, intractability, risk, efficacy (DIRE).
C. CAGE questionnaire.
D. Current opioid misuse measure (COMM).
7. Treatment plan – Appropriate treatment goals are crucial to patient success and do not necessarily
change with changes in therapy.
Example: Goal – Patients are able to stay at work 4 days a week for 6 hours. Goal – Patients are able
to get their own groceries each week unassisted.
8. Informed consent and agreement for treatment
a. Initial agreements
b. Patient responsibilities
i. Patients should attend all appointments.
ii. Patients should provide an accurate accounting of their symptoms.
iii. Patients should keep all medications in a safe place—Medication locker or cabinet.
iv. Patients will use only one pharmacy. All medications for pain management will be obtained
from one pharmacy.
v. On a regular basis, urine or blood samples may be needed to monitor for safety and efficacy
of the medication.
vi. Patients should follow the treatment plan for medications and other sections of the treatment
plan, including exercise, physical therapy, CBT, and counseling.
vii. Do not share medications or take medications received from others.
c. Provider responsibilities
i. Provider will listen respectfully to all patient concerns.
ii. Information will be given to the patient regarding all tests, diagnoses, and medications in a
language the patient can understand.
iii. Provider will communicate information regarding the patient’s medication therapy to other
health care providers or employers if requested by the patient.
iv. Each treatment plan will likely include medication as well as several forms of
nonpharmacologic therapy.
d. Punitive agreements – Agreements formed in response to problem behaviors should be patient-
specific, and they usually focus on improper use of opioids or illicit substances. Example sentences
may include the following:
i. A positive urine drug screen for marijuana, cocaine, or other medications that have not been
prescribed to the patient will result in termination of the current patient-provider relationship
with XYZ clinic.
ii. A quantity of X medication has been provided to treat a patient’s chronic pain. This
medication will be prescribed on a monthly basis after an appointment and evaluation of
the patient’s pain. Any pain medications received from other pain prescribers outside this
prescription (including x, y, z) will result in termination of the patient-provider relationship.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-457
Neurology
9. Periodic review
a. Patients who are receiving opioids on a regular basis should have their therapy evaluated for efficacy
and safety during a patient visit. These discussions should be documented in the patient record.
b. Throughout chronic opioid therapy, it is important to monitor the patient periodically for each of
the following:
i. Pain severity should be monitored on a routine basis to determine progress toward goals.
ii. Functional ability – A patient’s functional ability should be determined at baseline and then
monitored throughout therapy.
iii. Progress toward treatment goals
iv. Adverse effects
v. Effects secondary to comorbid conditions
vi. Aberrant drug-related behaviors
vii. Identify patients who might benefit from restructuring of the treatment plan.
viii. Identify patients who might benefit from receiving additional services such as addiction
counseling or treatment.
ix. Document ongoing vigilance for continuation of safe prescribing of the opioids.
x. Diversion – Many cases of unintended overdose occur in children and young adults who had
access to a family member’s medication. It is very important for patients to maintain control
of their medications.
xi. Misuse – Using pain medication to treat other conditions such as anxiety or sleep
xii. Addiction – A compulsive desire to use a drug despite continued harm. Addiction is a chronic,
neurobiologic disease that is influenced by genetic and environmental factors.
10. Consultation
a. For patients with a history of substance abuse or significant comorbid mental illness – A referral
for management by a pain specialist or pain/addiction specialist should be considered.
b. Many types of pain require interdisciplinary management to reach therapeutic goals. This may
include physical therapy, occupational therapy, psychologist/psychiatrist, social work, physician,
pharmacist, massage therapist/chiropractic manipulation, acupuncture, and nursing.
11. Documentation – All discussions and therapeutic plans must be documented in the patient chart, and
consideration of evaluation must be made by using symptom analysis (PQRST) as well as assessment
of the “4 A’s”: Analgesia, adverse effects, aberrant behavior, and activity.
12. Compliance with all controlled substance rules and regulations for state and federal prescribing authorities
13. Screening for adverse reactions
14. Choose the right opioid – May need to change agents to achieve therapeutic efficacy, minimize adverse
effects, with suitable pharmacokinetic properties in a suitable dosage form at an affordable cost to patient
a. Opioid conversions/rotations
b. Determine the total daily dose of all opioids being administered.
c. Using a published equianalgesic ratio, convert the current total daily dose to the new opioid.
d. Round down the new analgesic dose by 25%–50% (75%–90% lower if switching to methadone).
Patients do not respond to a new opioid with complete tolerance for an equianalgesic dose. Lower
adjustments are needed if the patient’s pain is severe at the time of conversion.
e. Determine a dosing schedule for the new regimen.
f. Schedule increased monitoring – Clinic visits or telephone follow-up during the period until
the patient’s new medication reaches steady state
g. Conversion ratios are used as a guide – Variability in interindividual pharmacokinetics and opioid
drug pharmacodynamics
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-458
Neurology
h. CYP2D6 polymorphism
i. Codeine (converts to morphine; poor metabolizers – Reduced response)
ii. Oxycodone (converts to oxymorphone; poor metabolizers – Increased adverse effects)
iii. Hydrocodone (converts to hydromorphone; extensive metabolizers – May have increased
adverse effects)
iv. Potential DDIs
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-459
Neurology
15. Dosage forms – The appropriate dosage form should be chosen according to the ability of the patient to
adhere to the dosing regimen, affordability, and history of efficacy with the agent.
a. Oral – The most appropriate dosage form for most patients. However, it can be difficult to
maintain a consistent concentration if the patient does not take the dose consistently.
i. Immediate-release tablets – These dosage forms are not ideal for chronic pain. Immediate-
release forms should be used for acute pain and breakthrough pain.
ii. Extended release
iii. Buccal/sublingual – Fentanyl dosage forms are available, but they should only be used in
opioid-tolerant patients for relief of severe breakthrough pain in cancer.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-460
Neurology
Patient Case
17. Z.T. has taken oxycodone controlled release for the past 8 years, 90 mg twice daily, for chronic low back pain
and diabetic neuropathy. Z.T. informs you today that there is a national shortage of his medication. Which
dose is best to suggest when changing Z.T.’s medication to morphine controlled release?
A. 60 mg twice daily.
B. 30 mg four times daily.
C. 120 mg daily.
D. 100 mg twice daily.
Table 22. Average Prices for Oral Medications Used for Pain
Brand Name Generic Name Dosage Form Average Wholesale Price, $
MS IR 15-mg tablet 27.07/100 tablets
30-mg tablet 46.12/100 tablets
MS Contin 15-mg tablet 167.57/100 tablets
30-mg tablet 317.19/100 tablets
60-mg tablet 621.33/100 tablets
100-mg tablet 919.95/100 tablets
200-mg tablet 1838.19/100 tablets
Avinza 30-mg capsule 572.96/100 capsules
45-mg capsule 849.55/100 capsules
60-mg capsule 1112.63/100 capsules
75-mg capsule 1415.90/100 capsules
90-mg capsule 1672.92/100 capsules 1973.87/100
Morphine sulfate
120-mg capsule capsules
Kadian 10-mg capsule 473.21/100 capsules
20-mg capsule 522.89/100 capsules
30-mg capsule 568.70/100 capsules
40-mg capsule 976.80/100 capsules
50-mg capsule 950.38/100 capsules
60-mg capsule 1137.38/100 capsules 1515.25/100
80-mg capsule capsules 1900.74/100 capsules
100-mg capsule 4946.40/100 capsules
200-mg capsule 12.29/100 mL
Roxanol 10-mg/5-mL solution 71.53/100 mL
20-mg/5-mL solution
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-461
Neurology
Table 22. Average Prices for Oral Medications Used for Pain (continued)
Brand Name Generic Name Dosage Form Average Wholesale Price, $
Subsys Fentanyl 100-mcg spray 1115.96/30 sprays
200-mcg spray 1762.86/30 sprays
400-mcg spray 2672.51/30 sprays
600-mcg spray 3553.10/30 sprays
800-mcg spray 4439.82/30 sprays
1200-mcg spray 3553.10/30 sprays
1600-mcg spray 4439.82/30 sprays
12-mcg patch 101.51/5 patches
Duragesic 25-mcg patch 72.10/5 patches
50-mcg patch 131.80/5 patches
75-mcg patch 201.05/5 patches
100-mcg patch 266.80/5 patches
Dilaudid Hydromorphone 2-mg tablets 49.88/100 tablets
4-mg tablets 72.81/100 tablets
8-mg tablets 131.93/100 tablets
1-mg/mL solution 189.12/473 mL
Demerol Meperidine 50-mg tablets 68.50/100 tablets
100-mg tablets 129.90/100 tablets
Dolophine Methadone 5-mg tablets 38.45/100 tablets
10-mg tablets 44.22/100 tablets
5 mg/5 mL 46.80/500 mL
10 mg/5 mL 86.40/500 mL
Roxicodone Oxycodone 5-mg tablet 54.11/100 tablets
10-mg tablet 62.50/100 tablets
15-mg tablet 189.48/100 tablets
20-mg tablet 110.30/100 tablets
30-mg tablet 358.93/100 tablets
5-mg capsule 184.90/100 capsules
5-mg/5-mL solution 142.50/500 mL
10-mg tablet 246.34/100 tablets
OxyContin 15-mg tablet 475.54/100 tablets
20-mg tablet 471.40/100 tablets
30-mg tablet 837.78/100 tablets
40-mg tablet 836.48/100 tablets
60-mg tablet 1460.66/100 tablets
Xartemis XR Oxycodone/ 80-mg tablet 1573.01/100 tablets
acetaminophen 7.5-mg/325-mg tablet 276.00/100 tablets
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-462
Neurology
Table 22. Average Prices for Oral Medications Used for Pain (continued)
Brand Name Generic Name Dosage Form Average Wholesale Price, $
Opana Oxymorphone 5-mg tablet 357.00/100 tablets
10-mg tablet 672.00/100 tablets
Opana ER 5-mg tablet 181.26/100 tablets
7.5-mg tablet 264.65/100 tablets
10-mg tablet 348.06/100 tablets
15-mg tablet 482.69/100 tablets
20-mg tablet 617.33/100 tablets
30-mg tablet 888.54/100 tablets
40-mg tablet 1159.78/100 tablets
Generic Codeine 15-mg tablet 57.73/100 tablets
30-mg tablet 62.15/100 tablets
60-mg tablet 113.83/100 tablets
30-mg/5-mL solution 128.44/500 mL
Zohydro Hydrocodone 10-mg tablet 442.08/60 tablets
15-mg tablet 472.32/60 tablets
20-mg tablet 487.08/60 tablets
30-mg tablet 502.56/60 tablets
40-mg tablet 517.68/60 tablets
50-mg tablet 540.00/60 tablets
5-mg/300-mg tablet 191.04/100 tablets
Vicodin Hydrocodone/ 7.5-mg/300-mg tablet 214.27/100 tablets
Vicodin ES Acetaminophen 10-mg/300-mg tablet 276.44/100 tablets
Vicodin HP 10-mg/300-mg/15-mL elixir 220.50/473 mL
Lortab 7.5-mg/650-mg tablet 130.45/100 tablets
Lorcet Plus 10-mg/650-mg tablet 183.54/100 tablets
Lorcet 10/650 5-mg/325-mg tablet 54.20/100 tablets
Norco 7.5-mg/325-mg tablet 61.82/100 tablets
10-mg/325-mg tablet 110.00/100 tablets
Vicoprofen Hydrocodone/ 2.5-mg/200-mg tablet 292.13/100 tablets
Ibuprofen 5-mg/200-mg tablet 310.11/100 tablets
7.5-mg/200-mg tablet 114.65/100 tablets
Ultram Tramadol 50-mg tablet 83.75/100 tablets
Ultram ER 100-mg tablet 423.16/100 tablets
200-mg tablet 699.84/100 tablets
300-mg tablet 976.44/100 tablets
Generic 150-mg capsule 4635.08/500 capsules
ConZip 100-mg capsule 287.00/30 capsules
200-mg capsule 376.10/30 capsules
300-mg capsule 520.22/30 capsules
ER/XR = extended release; IR = immediate release.
Red Book Online through Truven. New York: Thomas Reuters, 2015.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-463
Neurology
A. Epidemiology
1. Relatively rare: 10–20 new cases per million
2. Prevalence: 150–200 cases per million, which has increasing in the past 5 decades
3. Age at onset
a. Autoimmune juvenile MG: 10%–15% of total cases
b. Can occur in neonates
c. Sex distribution
i. Male individuals: Sixth to eighth decade of life
ii. Female individuals: Second and third decade of life
B. Pathophysiology
1. Decreased transmission at the neuromuscular junction, leading to weakness of muscle contraction
a. Caused by the formation of antibodies binding to ACh receptors (anti-AChR Abs) in the
postsynaptic muscle membrane
b. Seronegative patients (who lack anti-AChR Abs) may have anti–muscle-specific tyrosine kinase
(MuSK) antibodies; the agrin/MuSK signaling pathway maintains the structural and functional
integrity of postsynaptic neuromuscular junction; anti-MuSK antibodies affect the agrin-
dependent AChR cluster and reduce AChR numbers.
C. Types of MG
1. Ocular – Limited to eyelids and extraocular muscles
2. Generalized – Affects ocular muscles and a combination of bulbar, limb, and/or respiratory muscles
D. Clinical Presentations
1. Fluctuating weakness and fatigue of skeletal muscle
a. Worse in evening or after exercise
b. Improves with rest
2. Muscle fatigue caused by worsening contractile force
3. Presenting symptoms
a. Ptosis and diplopia in more than 50%
b. Bulbar symptoms – Dysarthria, dysphagia, fatigable chewing
c. Proximal limb weakness
d. Neck and respiratory muscle weakness
E. Treatment Goals
1. Goal is remission.
2. MG is unpredictable, but there are three stages of the disease.
a. Active: Most severe symptoms
b. Stable: Stable, but persistent symptoms that may worsen with infection or medication changes
c. Remission: Symptom free with or without medications
F. Treatment Options
1. Symptomatic therapy
a. Place in therapy: First-line treatment
b. Advantages/disadvantages: Rapid onset; do not alter disease progression or outcome
c. Pharmacologic agent(s): Pyridostigmine – ACh inhibitor, increases available ACh at the
neuromuscular junction
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-464
Neurology
2. Rapid immunotherapies
a. Place in therapy: Acute management of severe muscular weakness, myasthenic crisis, preoperative
treatment before thymectomy, intermittent treatment to maintain remission when MG not well
controlled by chronic immunotherapies
b. Advantages/disadvantages: Rapid onset, but effect is transient.
c. Pharmacologic agent/modality
i. Plasmapheresis: Directly removes anti-AChR Abs
ii. Intravenous immunoglobulins: Inhibit cytokine competition with autoantibodies; inhibit
complement deposition; interfere with binding of Fc receptor on macrophages and
immunoglobulin receptor on B cells; interfere with antigen recognition by sensitized T cells
3. Chronic immunotherapies
a. Place in therapy: Induce and maintain remission
b. Advantages/disadvantages: Adverse effects may limit use in some patients.
c. Pharmacologic agent(s)
i. Prednisone: Corticosteroid, several mechanisms, reduces anti-AChR Abs concentrations
ii. Azathioprine: Purine analog, interferes with T- and B-cell proliferation through reduction of
nucleic acid synthesis
iii. Mycophenolate mofetil: Blocks purine synthesis, suppresses T- and B-cell proliferation
iv. Cyclosporine: Blocks synthesis and release of interleukin-2 and interferes with proliferation of
CD4+ T cells
v. Tacrolimus: Inhibits T-cell activation; binds with FKBP-12 to form a complex that inhibits
calcineurin phosphatase activity
4. Surgery – Thymectomy
a. Place in therapy: Patients with thymoma
b. Advantages/disadvantages: May not be a viable therapeutic approach for anti-MuSK antibody−
positive patients
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-465
Neurology
Patient Case
18. E.T. is a 50-year-old woman with MG of 2 years’ duration, with the chief complaint of neck and upper spine
pain, shoulder and upper arm weakness. During the past 6 months, she has had two admissions for acute
exacerbations of severe muscle weakness affecting her lower extremities and shortness of breath. She is
taking pyridostigmine 60 mg every 6 hours. The decision is made to add mycophenolate mofetil 500 mg
three times daily. Which of the following is a known adverse effect that is associated with mycophenolate
mofetil?
A. Alopecia.
B. Increased risk of infection.
C. Renal impairment.
D. Thrombocytosis.
Table 24. Average Prices for Oral Medications Used for Myasthenia Gravis
Generic Name Drug Name Dosage Form Average Wholesale Price, $
Mestinon 60-mg tablet 127.50/100 tablets
Pyridostigmine 60-mg/5-mL solution 1181.74/473 mL
Mestinon Timespan 180-mg tablet 241.78/30 tablets
1-mg tablet 19.42/100 tablets
2.5-mg tablet 16.54/100 tablets
Prednisone Deltasone 5-mg tablet 20.36/100 tablets
10-mg tablet 21.83/100 tablets
20-mg tablet 25.90/100 tablets
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-466
Neurology
Table 24. Average Prices for Oral Medications Used for Myasthenia Gravis (continued)
50-mg tablet 211.00/100 tablets
Imuran
Azathioprine 75-mg tablet 1496.40/100 tablets
Azasan
100-mg tablet 667.13/100 tablets
200-mg/mL powder 1101.40/160 mL
Mycophenolate mofetil CellCept 250-mg capsule 392.32/100 tablets
500-mg tablet 784.65/100 tablets
25-mg capsule 41.25/30 capsules
100-mg capsule 164.89/30 capsules
Cyclosporine Sandimmune 25-mg liquid capsule 41.26/30 liquid capsules
100-mg liquid capsule 164.88/30 liquid capsules
100-mg/mL solution 299.55/50 mL
0.5-mg capsule 222.98/100 capsules
Tacrolimus Prograf 1-mg capsule 445.95/100 capsules
5-mg capsule 2229.75/100 capsules
Red Book Online through Truven. New York: Thomas Reuters, 2015.
A. Epidemiology
1. More than 400,000 Americans, 2.5 million worldwide
2. 200 new cases of MS are diagnosed each week in the United States.
3. Age at onset: Most people given a diagnosis of MS are between 20 and 50 years of age.
4. Sex distribution: Female/male risk ratio is approximately 2:1 to 3:1.
B. Pathophysiology
1. Etiology
a. Combination of genetics, altered immune system, environmental (e.g., measles, mumps, rubella,
Epstein-Barr virus, human herpes virus 6)
b. Increasing distance from the equator associated with increased risk of MS
2. Key physiologic changes
a. Stripping of the myelin sheath surrounding CNS axons
b. Associated with an inflammatory, perivenular infiltrate of T and B lymphocytes, macrophages,
antibodies, and complement
c. Demyelination renders axons susceptible to damage, becomes irreversible when they are severed.
d. Irreversible axonal damage correlates with disability; visualized as hypointense lesions, or
“black holes,” on T-weighted MRI.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-467
Neurology
2. Course of illness
a. Relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS)
i. Attacks/exacerbations—New symptoms lasting at least 24 hours and separated from other
new symptoms by at least 30 days, followed by complete or incomplete remissions
ii. First attack: Clinically isolated syndrome (CIS); subsequent attacks also called relapses
iii. Radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS): Occurs in patients who have an MRI scan done for
another reason and have lesions consistent with MS
iv. New brain MRI lesions correlate with clinical attacks.
v. Attack frequency decreases over time and becomes independent of the development of
progressive disabilities.
vi. Neurologic recovery after an acute exacerbation is often quite good in the early phase but
tends to be less complete after repeated relapses.
b. Secondary-progressive MS (SPMS)
i. Progressive phase, exacerbations and remissions less difficult to identify, disability
accumulates significantly
ii. New brain MRI lesions are less common; brain atrophy and T1 holes increase.
c. Primary-progressive MS (PPMS)
i. Presents with symptoms (especially spastic paraparesis) that may worsen rapidly or relatively
slowly over time
ii. Accrue progressively more disability; worse prognosis than RRMS
d. Progressive-relapsing MS (PRMS): Mixture of both progression and relapses
D. Pharmacologic Treatment
1. Treatment of acute exacerbations: Shorten disease duration and possibly severity
a. Methylprednisolone
i. Route/dose: Intravenously/500–1000 mg/day for 3–5 days
ii. Adverse effects: Sleep disturbance, a metallic taste, GI upset (rarely), impaired blood glucose control
b. Plasma exchange: For patients with more severe attacks or whose condition is not responding to
intravenous corticosteroids
2. Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs): Alter the course of the illness, diminish progressive disability
over time (see Table 25)
3. Symptomatic therapy: Maintain quality of life (see Table 26)
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-468
Table 25. Pharmacologic Agents for Disease-Modifying Therapy in MS
Efficacy
Pharmacologic
Mechanism of Action (% decrease compared Route/Dose Safety Considerations Monitoring
Agent/Indications
with placebo)
ARR IM (Avonex):
Avonex – 32% 7.5 mcg weekly,
Rebif 22 titrating up
mcg – 29% 7.5 mcg weekly to
Interferon β-1a Rebif 44 30 mcg weekly
(Avonex, Rebif) mcg – 32%
SC (Rebif):
Betaseron – 28% AEs: Flulike symptoms,* fatigue,
Avonex: 4.4 mcg three
Reduce activation and EDSS times weekly x injection
CIS, RRMS
entry of T cells into the Avonex – 37% 2 wk, 11 mcg site reactions,
CNS, reduce adhesion Rebif 22 three times LFT abnormalities, depression
Rebif: RRMS CBC and LFTs
molecules and helper T mcg – 22% weekly x *Preinjection and postinjection every 6 months
cell proinflammatory Rebif 44 2 wk, 22–44 acetaminophen or NSAIDs may
cytokines, and reduce mcg – 30% mcg three times reduce flu-like symptoms.
matrix metalloproteinases Betaseron – 24% weekly
1-469
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
Table 25. Pharmacologic Agents for Disease-Modifying Therapy in MS (continued)
Efficacy
Pharmacologic
Mechanism of Action (% decrease compared Route/Dose Safety Considerations Monitoring
Agent/Indications
with placebo)
Prior initiation:
CBC, varicella
zoster antibody,
LFT
AEs: Bradyarrhythmia, AV block,
nasopharyngitis, dyspnea, headaches, First dose
S1P analog; reduces diarrhea, nausea, skin cancer, macular monitoring
Fingolimod ARR: 40%–62% edema, increased liver enzymes
autoaggressive (6 hours):
(Gilenya)
lymphocytes in REMS ECG before dose and
EDSS: 15%–40% PO: 0.5 mg daily
circulation and CNS by at 6 hours, hourly
Relapsingforms of Varicella zoster vaccination (if
down- regulation of SIP HR and BP, observe
MS Gd-MRI: 35%–74% antibody negative); avoid live,
receptor for bradycardia/
attenuated vaccine bradyarrhythmia
FDA pregnancy category C
1-470
Ophthalmology
Neurology
examination at
baseline and 3–4
months after
AEs: Headache, back pain, infusion
Selective adhesion
reaction,
molecule inhibitor;
ARR: 68% anaphylactoid reaction (rare),
Natalizumab inhibits leukocyte
immune reconstitutioninflammatory CBC and LFTs every
(Tysabri) adhesion and migration IV: 300 mg
EDSS: 41% syndrome, PML 6 months, anti- JCV
Relapsing forms across blood-brain barrier every 4 weeks
antibody test
of MS by blocking adhesion Black box warning: PML TOUCH
Gd-MRI: 83%
molecule very late program (REMS)
antigen-4
FDA pregnancy category C
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
Table 25. Pharmacologic Agents for Disease-Modifying Therapy in MS (continued)
Efficacy
Pharmacologic
Mechanism of Action (% decrease compared Route/Dose Safety Considerations Monitoring
Agent/Indications
with placebo)
Attenuates
proinflammatory stimuli;
AEs: Diarrhea, cramps,
Dimethyl fumarate therefore, neuroprotection
ARR: 44%–53% PO: 120 mg nausea, and flushing*
(Tecfidera) – Antioxidant and anti-
twice daily for 7
inflammatory effects EDSS: 21%–38% CBC every 6 months
days; then 240 mg *Administer with food
Relapsing forms mediated through nuclear
Gd-MRI:57%–85% twice daily
of MS factor
FDA pregnancy category C
E2–related factor
signaling pathway
AEs: Nasopharyngitis, alopecia,
nausea,
limb pain, diarrhea, arthralgia,
neutropenia, agranulocytosis,
pancytopenia, and thrombocytopenia Prior initiation: LFT,
1-471
CBC,
Neurology
Teriflunomide Inhibits pyrimidine ARR: 31% Black box warning:Contraindicated pregnancy test,
(Aubagio) synthesis, therefore in pregnancy/women of childbearing tuberculin skin test
PO: 7–14 mg
preventing the EDSS: 24%–30% age not using reliable contraception; to exclude latent
once daily
Relapsing forms proliferation of T cells hepatotoxicity tuberculosis
of MS and B cells Gd-MRI:17%–31%
Accelerated elimination with LFT monthly for
cholestyramine or activated charcoal first 6 months
if drug discontinuation required
Avoid live, attenuated vaccine
FDA pregnancy category X
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
Table 25. Pharmacologic Agents for Disease-Modifying Therapy in MS (continued)
Efficacy
Pharmacologic
Mechanism of Action (% decrease compared Route/Dose Safety Considerations Monitoring
Agent/Indications
with placebo)
AEs: Rash, headache, pyrexia,
nasopharyngitis, nausea, urinary
tract infection, fatigue, insomnia,
upper respiratory tract infection,
herpes viral infection, urticaria, Before use and
IV for 4 hours
Binds to the cell surface pruritus, thyroid gland disorders, monthly intervals
for 2 treatment
antigen CD52 on the fungal infection, arthralgia, pain thereafter:
courses:
surface of B and T in extremity, back pain, diarrhea, CBC with
Alemtuzumab lymphocytes, monocytes, First course: sinusitis, oropharyngeal pain, differential, SCr,
ARR: 49%–54%*
(Lemtrada) macrophages, and 12 mg/day on 5 paresthesia, dizziness, abdominal urine analysis
natural killer cells, EDSS: 28%–42%* consecutive days pain, flushing, vomiting
Thyroid function
Relapsing forms which is followed by
Gd-MRI: N/A Second course: Black Box Warning: Fatal (TSH) at baseline
of MS an antibody-dependent
12 mg/day on 3 autoimmune conditions, infusion and every 3 months
cellular cytolysis and
1-472
consecutive days reactions, malignancies
complement-mediated Skin examination
Neurology
12 months after
lysis REMS program to monitor for
first course
melanoma yearly
Varicella zoster vaccination (if
antibody negative); avoid live,
attenuated vaccine
FDA pregnancy category C
*Compared to INF β-1a SC.
AE = adverse effect; APC = antigen-presenting cell; ARR = annualized relapse rate; AV = atrioventricular; BP = blood pressure; CBC = complete blood cell count; CIS = clinically isolated syndrome; CNS = central
nervous system; ECG = electrocardiogram; EDSS = Expanded Disability Status Scale; FDA = U.S. Food and Drug Administration; Gd-MRI = gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (T2 lesions);
HR = heart rate; IFN = interferon; IM = intramuscular(ly); IV = intravenous(ly); JCV = JC virus; LFT = liver function test; MBP = myelin basic protein; MHC = major histocompatibility complex; MS = multiple
sclerosis; N/A = not applicable; NSAID = nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; PML = progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy; PO = orally; REMS = Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies; RRMS =
relapsing-remitting MS; SC = subcutaneous(ly); SCr = serum creatinine concentration; S1P = sphingosine-1- phosphate; SC = subcutaneous; TSH = thyroid-stimulating hormone; wk = week(s).
Micromedex 2.0 [Internet version]. Greenwood Village, CO: Truven Health Analytics. Available at www.micromedexsolutions.com/. Accessed January 20, 2014.
Aubagio [package insert]. Cambridge, MA: Genzyme, 2012.
Gilenya [package insert]. Greenville, NC: GlaxoSmithKline, 2011.
Adapted from: Sanford M, Lyseng-Williamson KA. Subcutaneous recombinant interferon-β-1a (Rebif): a review of its use in the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis. Drugs 2011;71:1865-91 (Table VII).
Adapted from: Damal K, Stoker E, Foley JF. Optimizing therapeutics in the management of patients with multiple sclerosis: a review of drug efficacy, dosing, and mechanisms of action. Biologics Targets Ther
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
2013;7:247-58 (Table 2).
Neurology
Patient Cases
20. M.B. has been receiving a first-generation DMT for 3 years. Initially, the first-generation DMT worked well,
and she reported no relapses; however, during the past year, she has reported four attacks. An MRI reveals
several new lesions, and she has missed several weeks of work. Which is the best DMT to recommend
currently (assuming all will be effective)?
A. Mitoxantrone.
B. Interferon β-1a.
C. Teriflunomide.
D. Natalizumab.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-473
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-474
Neurology
Table 27. Average Prices for Medications (DMT) Used for Multiple Sclerosis
Average Wholesale
Brand Name Generic Name Dosage Form
Price, $
Betaseron IFN β-1b (SC) 0.3-mg kit 6777.46/kit
Extavia 0.3-mg kit 6057.83/kit
Avonex IM IFN β-1a 30-mcg/0.5-mL kit 6403.20/kit
Rebif SC IFN β-1a 44-mcg/0.5-mL solution 6911.66/12 syringes
22-mcg/0.5-mL solution 6911.66/12 syringes
Copaxone Glatiramer acetate 20-mg/mL solution 7332.60//30 syringes
40-mg/mL solution 6009.60/12 syringes
Gilenya Fingolimod 0.5-mg capsule 6997.46/30 capsules
Tysabri Natalizumab 20-mg/mL solution 6309.60/15 mL
Tecfidera Dimethyl fumarate 120 mg 1620.00/14 capsules
240 mg 6945.60/60 capsules
Aubagio Teriflunomide 7 mg 6459.50/28 tablets
14 mg 6459.50/28 tablets
Lemtrada Alemtuzumab 10-mg/mL solution 23700.00/1.2 mL
DMT = disease-modifying therapy; IFN = interferon; IM = intramuscular; SC = subcutaneous.
Red Book Online through Truven. New York: Thomas Reuters, 2015.
A. Epidemiology
1. Annual incidence of 4 per 100,000 with around 250,000 survivors
2. Prevalence: Estimated at 3–4 times greater than the annual incidence
3. An estimated 40% are nontraumatic myelopathies.
B. Pathophysiology
1. A wide variety of processes can cause injury to the spinal cord.
2. Chronic myelopathy caused by the following:
a. Degenerative disorders of the spinal canal with impingement on the spinal cord
b. Vascular diseases
c. Metabolic disorder
d. Infections
e. Benign and malignant tumors
f. Immunologic/inflammatory disease
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-475
Neurology
iii. Common precipitating stimuli: Bladder distention, bowel impaction, pressure sores, occult
bone fractures, visceral disturbances
iv. Acute management: Sit patient upright to lower BP orthostatically, identify and eliminate
causative stimulus, use short-acting antihypertensive agents with rapid onset of action if severe.
v. See Acute Management of Autonomic Dysreflexia Clinical Practice Guidelines from
Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine.
b. Coronary artery disease (CAD)
i. Decreased muscle mass, increased fat, and inactivity increase the risk of CAD.
ii. Management strategy: Control risk factors, statins if indicated.
iii. See the Adult Treatment Panel IV clinical practice guidelines.
c. Pulmonary disorders
i. Cervical and high thoracic myelopathies affect respiratory muscles.
ii. Increased risk of pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism
iii. See the current Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and/or CHEST guidelines.
2. Urinary tract
a. Bladder dysfunction
i. Myelopathies often produce bladder dysfunction or neurogenic bladder.
ii. Management strategy: Intermittent self-catheterization if voluntary voiding not possible,
anticholinergics and/or α-blockers
iii. See Bladder Management for Adults with Spinal Cord Injury from Consortium for Spinal
Cord Medicine.
b. Urinary tract infections
i. Common in all SCIs. Catheterization increases risk of infection.
ii. Common treatment: Antibiotics
iii. See the current IDSA guidelines.
3. Immobility or reduced mobility
a. Contractures
i. Reorganization of periarticular collagen tissue
ii. No pharmacologic treatment
b. Repetitive motion injuries
i. Overuse of arms or other compensatory activities
ii. No pharmacologic treatment
c. Osteoporosis
i. Increased risk of leg or hip fractures occurring below the SCI
ii. Common treatment: Bisphosphonates
iii. See the current National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) clinical practice guidelines.
d. Heterotopic ossification
i. Deposition of bone with soft tissue occurs in up to half of traumatic SCIs.
ii. Common treatment: NSAIDs for inflammation
e. Pressure ulcers
i. Tissue damage caused by unrelieved pressure occurring over bony prominences.
ii. No pharmacologic treatment
f. Spasticity
i. Increased deep tendon reflexes, augmented cutaneous and autonomic reflexes, involuntary
spasm, or clonus
ii. Common treatment: Baclofen, tizanidine, diazepam, or dantrolene
iii. See Cochrane Review for pharmacologic interventions for spasticity after an SCI.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-476
Neurology
g. Pain
i. An estimated 40% of patients will experience neurogenic or neuropathic pain.
ii. Common treatment: Depends on severity of pain
iii. See above pain section (III. PAIN).
D. Clinical Presentations
1. Level of injury dictates which bodily functions are altered or lost.
2. Damage can cause changes in movement, feeling, bladder control, or other bodily functions.
E. Treatment Goals
1. Goal is management of complications.
2. Complications will be patient-specific and will vary.
A. Epidemiology
1. Most common cause of dementia in the United States; currently affects 5 million adults
2. Incidence
a. Annually, 1% of adults between the age of 60 and 70 years
b. 6%–8% of adults 85 years and older
3. Prevalence
a. Affects 10% of adults 60–70 years and older
b. Affects almost 50% of adults 85 years and older
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-477
Neurology
C. Clinical Presentation
1. Cognition
a. Mild cognitive impairment (MCI)
i. Preclinical AD
ii. Memory impairment that may be noticeable to others but that does not interfere with daily
life; not severe enough to meet the definition of dementia
iii. Patients with MCI develop AD at a higher rate; however, not all patients with MCI go on to
develop dementia.
iv. Lack of clear evidence to recommend the use of medications to slow the progression of MCI
to dementia
b. Cognitive loss in AD
i. Insidious onset; chronic gradual loss of memory and other cognitive abilities
ii. Inability to retain new information; remote memory spared until late disease
iii. Affects many areas of cognition
(a) Language
(b) Abstract reasoning
(c) Executive function
(d) Decision-making
iv. Of sufficient severity to affect daily life, work, social interactions
2. Activities of daily living (ADLs) – Typically occurs later in the course of disease compared with
cognitive loss
a. Gradual loss of ability to perform self-care activities
i. Bathing
ii. Toileting
iii. Feeding
iv. Dressing
v. Transfer
vi. Ambulation
b. Instrumental ADLs
i. Managing finances
ii. Managing medications
iii. Cooking
iv. Shopping
v. Using telephone
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-478
Neurology
Patient Case
21. D.T. is a 76-year-old widowed woman in the clinic today, accompanied by her daughter, for evaluation of cognitive
concerns. D.T. has a history of osteoarthritis, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation. The daughter states that D.T. has
had difficulties with her memory for almost a year. Initially, the symptoms were minor; D.T. would forget names
or recent events, but more recently, the memory concerns have been more severe, and D.T. is becoming less able
to manage at home alone, according to her daughter. D.T. states that she does not think she has memory problems.
There is no known history of AD in their family. D.T.’s father died of a stroke, and her mother died of colon
cancer. There is no recent history of falls, head trauma, or substance abuse. On evaluation today, the neurologic
examination is normal. An MMSE is performed, and D.T. scores 22/30. She has a 12th-grade education. Her score
on the Geriatric Depression Scale is 2/30. Blood is drawn for laboratory testing, and D.T. is scheduled for a CT scan.
Which best describes the findings observed in this case?
A. Pseudodementia.
B. Alzheimer disease.
C. Multi-infarct dementia.
D. Cognitive impairment.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-479
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-480
Neurology
iv. The cognitive deficits cannot be attributable to other causes (e.g., medications, stroke, tumors,
vitamin deficiencies).
v. The deficits are not caused by delirium.
c. The National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke (NINCDS) and
the Alzheimer’s disease and Related Disorders Association (ADRDA) criteria, published in 1984,
have long been used as a basis for AD diagnosis. In May 2011, the National Institute on Aging and
the Alzheimer’s Association jointly updated the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria.
Table 28. Medications That May Contribute to Impaired Cognition (not exhaustive)
Anticholinergic Effects Benzodiazepines Other CNS Effects
Amitriptyline Clorazepate Carisoprodol
Benztropine Chlordiazepoxide Chlorzoxazone
Chlorpheniramine Diazepam Cimetidine
Cyclobenzaprine Flurazepam Clonidine
Darifenacin Lorazepam Esomeprazole
Desipramine Oxazepam Guanethidine
Dicyclomine Temazepam Guanadrel
Diphenhydramine Indomethacin
Doxepin Meperidine
Fesoterodine Methocarbamol
Hydroxyzine Omeprazole
Imipramine Pantoprazole
Nortriptyline Phenobarbital
Oxybutynin Propoxyphene
Solifenacin Reserpine
Thioridazine
Tolterodine
Trospium
CNS = central nervous system.
4. Neuroimaging: CT or MRI – Most useful for ruling out other causes such as stroke or tumor
a. Not diagnostic for AD
b. Yield is relatively low, but more likely to find structural lesions if:
i. Younger than 60 years
ii. Neurologic signs or symptoms
iii. Rapid decline
iv. Underlying risks (anticoagulant use, malignancy)
5. Laboratory testing to identify underlying factors that may be contributing to symptoms
a. Complete blood cell count
b. Thyroid-stimulating hormone
c. Vitamin B12, folate
d. Calcium
e. Liver and kidney function
f. Electrolytes, glucose
g. Serologic testing for neurosyphilis (select individuals)
6. Assessment instruments
a. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) (most common test used in clinical practice)
i. Screening tool for cognitive impairment; not intended to diagnose AD/dementia
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-481
Neurology
E. Clinical Management
1. Treatment goals
a. Improve quality of life.
b. Maximize/maintain functional status and independence.
c. Maintain/enhance cognitive status.
d. Minimize mood and behavioral problems.
e. Minimize safety hazards (driving, cooking, wandering).
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-482
Neurology
2. Nonpharmacologic therapy
a. Group support (i.e., Alzheimer’s Association – www.alz.org)
b. Patient, family, caregiver education
i. Expectations
ii. Planning
iii. Realistic goals
c. Physical and mental activities, including aerobic exercise, socialization, cognitive activities such
as crossword puzzles, and reading
d. Avoid inappropriate medications (see Table 28).
Patient Case
22. The daughter of an 81-year-old woman with AD asks the physician to begin treating the patient with a drug
for her difficulties with memory. Her mother was given a diagnosis of probable AD 4 years ago and is now in
a nursing home; she can perform some of her ADLs, but only with assistance. Her most recent MMSE score
was 14/30. She has been admitted to the emergency department twice in the past 6 months for bradycardia
secondary to sick sinus syndrome. Which is the safest AD treatment to recommend for this patient?
A. Donepezil.
B. Memantine.
C. Rivastigmine.
D. Galantamine.
3. Pharmacotherapy
a. Cholinesterase inhibitors
i. Block the esterase-mediated metabolism of acetylcholine to choline and acetate in the
synaptic cleft = Increased acetylcholine availability to bind at postsynaptic muscarinic
receptors
ii. Specific agents – See Table 30.
(a) Donepezil
(b) Rivastigmine
(c) Galantamine
(d) Tacrine – More for historical interest; still available as brand name only, but not
marketed. Very poorly tolerated from a gastrointestinal (GI) standpoint and associated
with liver toxicity
(e) Combination of memantine 14 mg/donepezil 10 mg ER (for severe renal impairment—
CrCL 5–29 mls/min) and memantine 28 mg/donepezil 10 mg ER capsules given daily—
can be opened and sprinkled on food if necessary. You must be stable on memantine (14
(renal impairment) or 28 mg) and donepezil (10 mg) prior to starting this product.
iii. Indications
(a) Oral rivastigmine and galantamine approved for treatment of mild to moderate AD
(b) Donepezil and rivastigmine patch are approved for treatment of mild, moderate, and severe AD.
iv. Initiate therapy at the starting dose (Table 30), and titrate to the target dose. Guidelines suggest
initiating therapy early, as soon as the diagnosis is made, to maximize clinical benefits. Initiating
therapy at higher doses increases the risk of intolerable adverse effects, including nausea and
vomiting, which may be severe enough to cause esophageal ruptures. Interruption of therapy
for more than a few days requires retitration from the starting dose and dose increases at the
recommended intervals to avoid the possibility of significant adverse effects.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-483
Neurology
(a) The choice of agent has little to do with clinical efficacy because the agents are essentially
equally efficacious; choice is more often related to adverse effect profile and tolerability.
Donepezil is the most commonly used agent because it is generally tolerated the best.
(b) The newer high-dose agents (donepezil 23 mg and rivastigmine patch 13 mg) should be
used cautiously because they are associated with an increased incidence of adverse effects.
For many patients, a dose increase does not lead to a significant increase in efficacy.
(c) It is important to understand, for both clinicians and patients, that these medications
do not reverse the underlying pathophysiology of the disease. Patients’ condition will
continue to progress with or without treatment. The benefits of treatment may not be
clearly apparent to patients and family members. At best, these medications may very
modestly slow cognitive decline relative to no treatment, and in some patients, little or
no cognitive/functional benefit may be achieved. As such, treatment should be reviewed
periodically for continued benefit. In addition, these medications can be associated with
significant adverse effects that must be balanced with clinical benefit. The American
Geriatrics Society Choosing Wisely Workgroup has highlighted the use of cholinesterase
inhibitors as one of 10 items that should be questioned by clinicians and patients (see
references at end of chapter).
v. Cautions/warnings
(a) Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma – Cholinergic effects can increase
bronchoconstriction and secretions.
(b) Sick sinus syndrome or bradycardia – Cholinergic effects can worsen bradycardia, which
can lead to hypotension or syncope in certain individuals; also, use caution in individuals
taking β-blockers or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers.
(c) Peptic ulcer disease – Cholinergic effects increase gastric acid production; of particular
concern in patients with a history of ulcer disease or in those taking steroids or NSAIDs
vi. Monitoring
(a) Efficacy and expectations – Patients and their families should understand that the
medications used to treat AD are not cures; they will not significantly repair the damage
that is done, and they will not prevent the ultimate progression of the disease. Changes in
MMSE scores with treatment can be variable. May see slight improvement with MMSE
scores (1 or 2 points) in some patients, but many patients will not experience significant
changes in MMSE scores. With time, MMSE scores will continue to decline, despite
continued treatment.
(b) Safety – See Adverse Effects in Table 30 and Cautions/Warnings.
vii. Discontinuing therapy
(a) Lack of clear recommendations for when to discontinue therapy – Important to include family
and/or caregivers when discussing therapy discontinuance, including risks versus benefits
(b) May see clinical deterioration when discontinued, depending at what stage medications
are discontinued. Rather than discontinuing therapy abruptly, consideration should be
given to tapering treatment over a few weeks to avoid withdrawal syndrome.
(c) When patients are unable to speak, ambulate, or provide any self-care, there is little
reason to continue these medications; the risks of therapy exceed the benefits at this point.
Some suggest that the need for nursing home care defines the limit of usefulness for these
medications, thus signifying the need to discontinue. Guidelines from the American
Geriatrics Society’s A Guide to Dementia Diagnosis and Treatment recommend
treatment discontinuation when the functional assessment staging (FAST) score is 7 (see
below). A score of 7 correlates to a loss of speech and ambulation and is consistent with
end-stage dementia.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-484
Neurology
Table 29. Functional Assessment Staging (FAST) (Check highest consecutive level of disability.)
*Scored primarily on the basis of information obtained from a knowledgeable informant and/or caregiver.
Reisberg B. Functional assessment staging (FAST). Psychopharmacol Bull 1988;24:653-9.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-485
Table 30. Medications Approved for the Treatment of Alzheimer Disease
Drug Name Mechanism Dose/Titration Dosage Forms Adverse Effects Comments
Donepezil AChEI Start at 5 mg/day at bedtime; Tablets 5, 10, 23 Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, Starting dose of 5 mg is clinically
(Aricept) after 4–6 weeks, may increase mg; orally disinte- dyspepsia, dizziness, effective; 23-mg tablets should not
to 10 mg/day; after 3 months grating tablets 5, headache, syncope, be split or crushed
of tolerating 10 mg/day, may 10 mg; solution 5 bradycardia, muscle
consider increase to 23 mg/ mg/5 mL; generic weakness; nausea, vomiting,
day for patients with moderate available for 5- and and weight loss are more
to severe disease for carefully 10-mg doses common with the 23-mg
selected patients; increase to dose, particularly among
23-mg dosage form associated patients who weigh less than
with limited clinical benefit 55 kg
Galantamine AChEI Start at 4 mg twice daily (8 Tablets 4, 8, 12 mg; Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, 16 mg/day is the minimally
(Razadyne, mg/day with ER product); ER capsules 8, 16, dyspepsia, dizziness, effective dose (target dose);
Razadyne ER) after ≥4 weeks, increase to 24 mg; solution 4 headache, syncope, presynaptic nicotinic receptor
8 mg twice daily (16 mg/day mg/mL; generic bradycardia, muscle effects, but of unknown clinical
with ER); after ≥4 weeks, may available weakness relevance
1-486
increase to max dose of 12 mg
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
clinical benefit
Table 30. Medications Approved for the Treatment of Alzheimer Disease (continued)
Drug Name Mechanism Dose/Titration Dosage Forms Adverse Effects Comments
Memantine NMDA Start at 5 mg/day; at weekly Capsules 5, 10 mg; Constipation, confusion, Can be used as monotherapy, or in
(Namenda, receptor intervals, increase by 5 mg/ oral solution 2 mg/ dizziness, headache, halluci- combination with AChEI; for CrCl
Namenda XR) modulator day in divided doses every 12 mL; XR capsules 7, nations, coughing < 30 mL/minute max dose of
hours until max dose of 10 14, 21, 28 mg 5 mg bid or 14 mg XR daily
mg twice daily achieved; XR recommended; for patients whose
start at 7 mg/day, and increase condition is stabilized with 10 mg
weekly by 7 mg/day up to twice daily, conversion to XR 28
max dose of 28 mg/day mg/day can occur the day after the
last 10-mg IR dose; for patients
with CrCl < 30 mL/minute taking
5 mg twice daily, conversion to
XR 14 mg daily can occur the day
after the last dose of 5 mg
Namzaric Combination Once daily in the evening 14-mg Nausea, vomiting, diar- Patients with renal impairment
(memantine/ AchEI and (28-mg memantine XR/10-mg memantine/10-mg rhea, dyspepsia, dizziness, (CrCl 5–29 mL/minute): Dose 14
donepezil) NMDA donepezil) for patients already donepezil headache, syncope, brady- mg/10 mg
1-487
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
Neurology
Patient Case
23. B.L. is a 72-year-old man who received a diagnosis of probable AD 1 year ago. He received initial treatment
with galantamine ER 8 mg/day shortly after his initial diagnosis, and about 8 months ago, his medication
was titrated upward to galantamine ER 24 mg. His most recent MMSE score was 23/30. He has tolerated this
drug well to this point. His insurance coverage for medications is Medicare Part D; 2 months ago, he entered
the “donut hole” and was unable to afford to pay out of pocket to continue taking galantamine ER. He is in
the clinic today, after the first of the year, and his physician is going to have B.L. restart galantamine. Which
is the most appropriate recommendation for B.L. to restart galantamine?
A. Restart at 8 mg/day for 4 weeks because he stopped taking the medication for a period longer than
several days.
B. Restart at 16 mg/day for 4 weeks because it has been less than 3 months since he stopped taking the
medication.
C. Restart at 24 mg/day because he has tolerated this dose.
D. Restart at 8 mg/day, but the medication may be titrated after 1 week.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-488
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-489
Neurology
iv. Choice of agent may be assisted by adverse effect profiles, which in some instances may be of
benefit to individual patients (e.g., mirtazapine may help with sleep issues or loss of appetite/
weight loss).
v. A 2011 meta-analysis of the treatment of depression in patients with dementia suggested
limited benefits to treatment; however, the analysis included only about 300 patients. The
studies included were inadequately powered to detect differences. Treatment should still be
considered for patients with depression because it may improve depressive symptoms and
cognition and may reduce behavioral problems in patients with AD.
b. Hallucinations and delusions
i. Consider whether hallucinations or delusions are caused by misinterpretation of environment
(patient in nursing home hears voices; however, the nursing home uses an overhead speaker/pager).
ii. Symptoms that are not disturbing or harmful to patient/patient functioning or to others do not
require pharmacologic treatment.
iii. Use of antipsychotic medications in patients with dementia has been associated with an
increase in the risk of stroke (number needed to harm -NNH about 111) and death (NNH
about 84) (black box warning from FDA), and they should be avoided if not clearly warranted.
c. Anxiety and sleep disorders
i. Consider nondrug solutions initially such as environmental factors, daytime napping, and depression.
ii. Trazodone 25–100 mg at bedtime for sleep or buspirone 30–60 mg/day for anxiety symptoms
can be considered.
iii. Avoid use of benzodiazepines for sleep or anxiety, if possible, because of effects on cognition
and increased risk of falls.
d. Agitation or aggression
i. Consider context of symptoms; opportunities for nonpharmacologic interventions
ii. If absolutely necessary for the patient’s safety or the safety of others, may consider low doses
of antipsychotics (risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, aripiprazole) when patient is at risk of
harming self or others; associated with increased risk of stroke and death in patients with AD.
This is off-label use; black box warning for use in patients with AD. The Clinical Antipsychotic
Trials in Intervention Effectiveness – Alzheimer Disease (CATIE-AD) study showed little
benefit of using antipsychotics for AD behaviors, considering both clinical benefits and adverse
effects. Minimizing the use of antipsychotics in long-term care is currently a big focus of
the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). CMS has established the National
Partnership to Improve Dementia Care and has set goals of reducing antipsychotics in long-term
care facilities by 25% by the end of 2015 and by 30% by the end of 2016.
iii. Other possible options: Valproic acid, carbamazepine, but very limited data to show benefits
in patients with AD
5. Investigational therapies – APP, β-amyloid, and the amyloid cascade have been a major focus of AD
research recently, decreasing production or increasing clearance of β-amyloid. None of the currently
available therapies to treat AD addresses the underlying pathology surrounding β-amyloid.
a. Tramiprosate (Alzhemed) – Amino acid taurine analog; thought to prevent aggregation of
β-amyloid into plaques. Has been abandoned as a prescription drug, but is being marketed as a
“medical food”
b. Tarenflurbil (Flurizan) – Alters γ-secretase, an enzyme involved with the production of β-amyloid
from APP. Evidence so far has failed to show benefits in memory or functioning.
c. Semagacestat – γ-Secretase inhibitor; phase II studies showed lowering of cerebrospinal fluid
biomarkers, but phase III studies were terminated after showing that actively treated patients
deteriorated more than did placebo recipients.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-490
Neurology
d. RAGE (receptor for advanced glycation end products) inhibitors – Are being studied as a way to
mitigate β-amyloid–induced brain dysfunction
e. Bapineuzumab – Monoclonal antibody that targets β-amyloid; studies actively recruiting; some
evidence suggests greater benefit in those who do not carry the APOE4 risk gene; trials with
bapineuzumab were suspended in the fall of 2012 because of disappointing trial results. Trials
with a similar drug, solanezumab, are continuing.
f. Statins – Studies have not shown benefits of statin agents for treatment or prevention of AD; not
recommended for this specific purpose
g. NSAIDs – Studies have not shown benefits of NSAIDs for treatment or prevention of AD; not
recommended for this specific purpose
h. Insulin; thiazolidinediones – Evidence suggests that a relationship exists between insulin resistance
and AD. A recent (September 2011) well-publicized pilot study of nasally administered insulin to
patients with AD showed stabilization or improvements in memory and physical functioning, relative
to placebo. This was a small pilot study that used a novel device currently not available to deliver the
insulin as studied, so using insulin in patients with AD should not be advocated at this time.
i. AN-1792 and ACC-001; CAD 106 – “Vaccines” to stimulate the immune system to develop
antibodies to β-amyloid. AN-1792 study was the initial vaccine study that was terminated because
6% of patients developed encephalopathy; ACC-001 study is actively recruiting; its mechanism is
similar to AN1792, but it is a different formulation. Studies involving CAD 106 are ongoing.
Patient Cases
24. An 87-year-old woman with severe AD is in the nursing home and is having disturbing visual hallucinations
at night that keep her awake. She is often disruptive to other residents on the unit. She has gotten out of bed on
many occasions, as though she were trying to get away from something or someone, and she has fallen twice.
She has taken lorazepam 0.5 mg at bedtime for 1 week, which has not improved her sleep or hallucinations.
Which is the most appropriate recommendation for this patient at this point in her disease course?
A. Stop lorazepam and begin zolpidem 5 mg at bedtime.
B. Stop lorazepam and begin trazodone 50 mg at bedtime.
C. Stop lorazepam and begin risperidone 0.25 mg at bedtime.
D. Stop lorazepam and begin temazepam 15 mg at bedtime.
25. B.D. is a 74-year-old woman with AD who has been taking galantamine 24 mg/day for 1 year. When she
was seen 2 months ago, her condition was stable and she was doing well with this drug. She is in the clinic
today with her daughter, who states that her mother’s memory and daily functioning have been noticeably
worse during the past 2–3 weeks. Additionally new since the past visit, B.D. has not been sleeping well at
night, so her daughter started giving her an over-the-counter sleeping agent, which has helped. Her MMSE
score today is 18/30. Two months ago, it was 21/30. Which statement most likely explains this recent change
in B.D.’s symptoms?
A. This represents the normal progression of the disease.
B. She is experiencing adverse effects of galantamine.
C. The sleep agent likely contains an antihistamine.
D. This represents the effects of sleep deprivation.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-491
Neurology
A. Epidemiology
1. Definition – External mechanical forces leading to brain injury
2. TBI is the most common cause of death and disability in individuals between 15 and 30 years of age.
High-risk groups include children 0–4 years, teenagers and young adults 15–24 years, and adults 75
years and older.
3. According to CDC statistics, 1.7 million individuals sustain a TBI annually in the United States, with
75% experiencing mild injury.
4. Common causes of TBI include the following:
a. Military-related injuries (explosive blasts and other combat injuries)
b. Sports-related injuries
c. Motor vehicle accidents
d. Falls
e. Violence (gunshot injury, domestic violence)
f. Poststroke injury
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-492
Neurology
C. Pharmacologic Management
1. Treatment goals: Minimize the long-term complications (disability) related to the injury
2. Pharmacologic options
a. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors
i. Limited data available for donepezil, rivastigmine, and physostigmine
ii. May have potential benefits in patients with chronic moderate and severe TBI (closed head
injury) with persistent cognitive deficits
iii. Preclinical TBI studies suggest reduced TBI-induced neuronal death, preservation of neurons,
and reduced blood-brain barrier disruption; preservation of neurologic and motor function
iv. General lack of well-designed studies and studies evaluating initiation weeks to months after
injury. Limited benefits for up to 38 weeks on neuropsychological testing outcomes
b. Amantadine
i. Anti-PD drug which effect may include blocking dopamine reuptake and influencing
dopamine synthesis; weak noncompetitive inhibitor of NMDA receptors
ii. Evidence of efficacy during the postacute period of severe TBI and disorders of
consciousness, including vegetative state and minimally conscious state; within 4–16 weeks of
TBI, patients treated with amantadine initiated at 100 mg twice daily and titrated to 200 mg
twice daily for 4 weeks improved, compared with placebo, on the Disability Rating Scale.
c. Statins
i. Potential benefits in TBI include effects on acute injury such as brain edema, blood-brain
barrier integrity, cerebral blood flow, neuroinflammation, axonal injury, and cell death.
ii. Simvastatin and atorvastatin have the most evidence supporting potential efficacy.
iii. Preclinical data provide evidence for acute or subacute administration in severe TBI; however,
lack of data testing delayed administration weeks or months after injury.
d. Methylphenidate
i. Methylphenidate promotes striatal dopaminergic neurotransmission after TBI and enhances
spatial learning, retention, and motor performance.
ii. Several trials have evaluated the effects of methylphenidate in mild to severe TBI in the
subacute or chronic phase (weeks to years post injury).
iii. End points are mixed, and heterogeneity of studies limits usefulness of data.
e. Other agents under investigation
i. Huperzine A: Chinese herb believed to have NMDA antagonist and antiseizure properties
ii. Cyclosporine A/FK 506: Animal models suggest preservation of mitochondrial function and
reduction of reactive oxygen species
iii. Erythropoietin: Potential activity may include attenuation of glutamate and nitric oxide
toxicity and antiapoptotic, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activity.
iv. Glyburide: Studies show that glyburide reduces inflammation, hemorrhage, and vasogenic
edema. Retrospective studies suggest that patients with diabetes treated with sulfonylureas
experience better recovery after non-lacunar stroke than do nonusers of sulfonylureas.
v. Growth hormone: Growth hormone deficiency is the most common anterior pituitary
abnormality post TBI.
vi. Lithium: May produce neuroprotective effects through reduction of excitotoxicity, ischemic
damage, and apoptosis; potential role in reducing β-amyloid accumulation
vii. vii. Progesterone: Preclinical models of TBI suggest that progesterone has neuroprotective
properties, enhancing behavioral and functional outcomes and decreasing cerebral edema,
apoptosis, and proinflammatory cytokines.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-493
Neurology
A. Epidemiology
1. Third most common neurologic disorder, behind AD and stroke
a. Average age at onset is 60 years.
b. More common in men, approaching a 2:1 ratio
2. Incidence
a. Age-dependent, increased with age
b. Annual incidence of 20/100,000 in adults older than 50 years
3. Prevalence
a. Between 2% and 3% of adults older than 65 years
b. Affects around 1 million people in the United States, 4 million worldwide
C. Clinical Presentation
1. Cardinal features
a. Resting tremor – Unilateral or bilateral; reduced/absent with movement and sleep
b. Rigidity – Limb muscles, cogwheeling
c. Bradykinesia – Slowed movement
2. Motor symptoms
a. Gait abnormalities, stooped posture, shuffling, festinations, lack of arm swing
b. Impaired fine movements (buttoning shirt)
c. Micrographia (small handwriting)
d. Masked face, dysarthric hypophonic speech
e. Decreased blinking, dysphagia, drooling
3. Autonomic symptoms
a. Orthostatic hypotension – Can be problematic because both the disease and the drugs used to treat
it can cause orthostatic changes
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-494
Neurology
Patient Case
26. A 72-year-old female patient is in the clinic for assessment after a fall 1 week ago. She was seen in the
emergency department at that time, but no significant injuries were noted. She states that she was dizzy
before her fall. She has a history of hypertension, PD, and osteoarthritis. Her current medications include
hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg/day, metoprolol XL (extended release) 50 mg/day, lisinopril 10 mg/day, tramadol
50 mg three times daily as needed for pain, levodopa/carbidopa CR (controlled release) 200/50 mg twice
daily, and pramipexole 0.125 mg twice daily. She states that her PD symptoms are much better controlled
since adding pramipexole and decreasing levodopa/carbidopa 1 month ago. On physical examination, blood
pressure is 136/72 mm Hg, with a heart rate of 60 beats/minute sitting, and 118/60 mm Hg, with a heart rate
of 62 beats/minute standing. Her gait looks good, and her strength is good. Which is the most appropriate
recommendation to reduce her risk of future falls?
A. Discontinue pramipexole.
B. Decrease metoprolol dose.
C. Add midodrine.
D. Add fludrocortisone.
D. Diagnosis
1. Medical history and physical examination are important, as in AD.
2. Neurologic examination: Cardinal features (resting tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity)
a. Possible – One cardinal feature
b. Probable – At least two cardinal features
c. Definite – At least two cardinal features and a positive response to levodopa
3. Neuroimaging mainly useful to rule out other causes
4. Staging and assessment instruments
a. Hoen and Yahr staging – Seldom used clinically
i. Stage 0 = No clinical signs evident
ii. Stage I = Unilateral involvement
iii. Stage II = Bilateral involvement without balance impairment
iv. Stage III = Bilateral involvement; mild postural imbalance; leads independent life
v. Stage IV = Bilateral involvement; postural instability; requires help with daily activities
vi. Stage V = Severe disease; restricted to chair or bed unless assisted
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-495
Neurology
Patient Case
27. A 68-year-old woman with PD has been taking levodopa/carbidopa 100/25 mg four times daily for 2 weeks.
Previously, she was taking levodopa/carbidopa 100/25 mg three times daily. She is calling your clinic to see
what she can do about the symptoms she describes, which include nausea, light-headedness, and involuntary
movements, which sound like dyskinesias. Her PD symptoms were fairly well controlled on the three-times-
daily schedule, but her physician increased the dose to four times daily to achieve additional benefit. Which
is the best recommendation to address this woman’s symptoms?
A. Add rasagiline.
B. Decrease the levodopa/carbidopa dose to 100/25 mg three times daily.
C. Add ropinirole.
D. Change the levodopa/carbidopa dose to 100/10 mg four times daily.
E. Clinical Management
1. Treatment goals
a. Minimize motor and nonmotor symptoms.
b. Maximize functional status and quality of life.
c. Minimize medication-related adverse effects.
d. Maximize safety (reduce fall risk).
2. Nonpharmacologic Therapy
a. Physical therapy
b. Balance and gait training
3. Pharmacologic Therapy – See Table 31.
a. Anticholinergics (benztropine, diphenhydramine)
i. Help correct imbalance between dopamine and acetylcholine
ii. Mainly beneficial for tremors; can be used as initial therapy if tremors are predominant
iii. Limited utility because of adverse effects, particularly among older patients (confusion,
urinary retention, constipation)
b. Dopamine precursor
i. Levodopa is the most clinically effective therapy for PD symptoms.
ii. Effective for all three cardinal features.
iii. Dopa decarboxylase inhibitor (carbidopa) added to prevent peripheral conversion of levodopa
to dopamine
(a) Reduces levodopa dose requirement
(b) Improves tolerability (nausea, orthostasis, cardiac adverse effects)
(c) Need 75–100 mg of carbidopa daily to saturate dopa decarboxylase enzyme peripherally
iv. Most patients eventually develop motor complications (wearing off, dyskinesias, on-off
phenomenon, freezing) with this drug after several years of use; some clinicians advocate
delaying use of levodopa until symptoms become quite bothersome or more severe because of
the high likelihood of developing motor complications with long-term use of levodopa. This
practice may be more relevant to younger patients with longer life expectancy.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-496
Neurology
(a) Wearing off describes loss of the clinical effect toward the end of the dosing interval; as the
disease progresses, the wearing-off effect occurs earlier, necessitating shorter dosing intervals.
(b) Dyskinesias are involuntary choreiform movements involving the neck, trunk, and upper
extremities; usually associated with peak drug effects
(c) On-off phenomenon or fluctuations describe rapid transitions from normal or controlled
motor activity to bradykinetic or uncontrolled motor activity.
(d) Freezing describes a drug-resistant off period or inability to initiate motor function;
start hesitations
c. Dopamine agonists
i. Directly stimulate dopamine receptors
ii. Can be used for initial therapy or as adjunctive therapy with levodopa
iii. Not as clinically effective as levodopa, but have fewer long-term motor complications relative
to levodopa
iv. Nonergot derivatives (pramipexole, ropinirole) preferred to ergot derivatives (bromocriptine,
pergolide) because of the risk of cardiac valvulopathy and fibrosis
v. When adding to levodopa, may need to decrease levodopa dose to avoid dopaminergic adverse
effects such as nausea, hallucinations, or dyskinesias
d. Monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitors
i. Block oxidative degradation of dopamine through MAO-B inhibition; theorized to slow
disease progression caused by reduced oxidative stress
ii. Can be used as initial therapy or as adjunctive therapy with levodopa
iii. The Deprenyl and Tocopherol Antioxidative Therapy of Parkinsonism (DATATOP) study
showed a slowing in progression of early PD with selegiline (by a delay in the need for
levodopa therapy). The study was done to evaluate whether selegiline had neuroprotective
properties caused by reduced oxidative metabolism of dopamine. However, the reduction in
dopamine metabolism produces a symptomatic benefit in PD that cannot clearly be attributed
to increased dopamine, neuroprotective properties, or both.
iv. Control of motor symptoms with MAO-B agents considered inferior to dopaminergic
agents (levodopa, dopamine agonists)
v. As adjunctive therapy, may improve motor complications related to chronic levodopa therapy.
vi. When adding to levodopa, may need to decrease levodopa dose because of excessive
dopaminergic effects (nausea, vomiting, hallucinations, dyskinesias)
vii. Selegiline is metabolized to an amphetamine metabolite, which can cause insomnia; second
daily dose is usually given at noontime rather than later in the day.
viii. MAO-B selective inhibition should not be an issue with tyramine-containing foods when used at
recommended doses.
ix. Many of the drug interactions with MAO-B selective agents are theoretical (e.g., amphetamines,
anorexiants, antidepressants, dextromethorphan, meperidine, methadone, propoxyphene,
trazodone, St. John’s wort, sympathomimetics).
(a) When used at recommended doses, potential for drug interactions is relatively low for
traditional oral administration.
(b) Orally disintegrating selegiline tablets are contraindicated for use with
dextromethorphan, methadone, propoxyphene, tramadol, and other MAO inhibitors.
e. Catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) inhibitors
i. Inhibit metabolism of levodopa
ii. Not useful as monotherapy; useful only in combination with levodopa – May need to decrease
levodopa dose when added to avoid adverse dopaminergic effects
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-497
Neurology
iii. Entacapone preferred to tolcapone because tolcapone is associated with fatal hepatotoxicity;
severe diarrhea is more common with tolcapone.
iv. Brown-orange urine discoloration may occur.
f. Amantadine
i. Thought to increase the synthesis and release of dopamine; decrease dopamine reuptake;
anticholinergic effects; some evidence of NMDA modulation (similar to memantine for AD)
ii. Can be used as initial monotherapy for mild to moderate disease or as adjunctive therapy with
levodopa in advanced disease
iii. May improve tremor, rigidity, and bradykinesia; generally not considered an appropriate
option as initial monotherapy in treatment guidelines
iv. May be most useful for treating dyskinesias (motor complications) associated with long-term
dopaminergic treatment
v. Requires dose adjustment for patients with renal impairment
(a) Typically dose in the range of 200–300 mg/day with normal renal function
(b) For CrCl of 30–50 mL/minute, 100 mg/day; for CrCl of 15–29 mL/minute, 100 mg every
other day; for CrCl less than 15 mL/minute, 200 mg once weekly
g. Apomorphine
i. Nonergot dopamine agonist
ii. Used for treatment of acute, intermittent “off” episodes (freezing) associated with advanced PD
iii. Administered subcutaneously at a starting dose of 2 mg (0.2 mL)
h. Coenzyme Q10
i. Endogenous antioxidant and a lipid-soluble electron carrier
ii. Produced by fermentation of beets
iii. Supports mitochondrial function and the electron transport chain
iv. A 2002 study evaluated the effects of placebo, 300 mg/day, 600 mg/day, 900 mg/day, and
1200 mg/day in patients with PD; patients were observed for 16 months and were assessed
by using the UPDRS; the group receiving the 1200-mg/day dose showed improved UPDRS
scores relative to placebo, with the greatest effects in daily function.
v. A 2014 study evaluated the effects of placebo, 1200 mg/day and 2400 mg/day in patients with
PD; the16-month study evaluated patients by using the UPDRS but failed to demonstrate a
clinically or statistically significant improvement.
Patient Case
28. T.B. is a 63-year-old man who received a diagnosis of early PD about 6 months ago but who is otherwise
healthy. He did not receive treatment with any medications when his PD was first diagnosed, but on the
advice of his physician he started therapy with selegiline 5 mg twice daily about 4 weeks ago. He is in the
clinic today because of difficulty sleeping and difficulty with his memory. He states that, on most days, he
feels tired but just cannot fall asleep. He states that his wife has a prescription for lorazepam 0.5 mg and that
he has taken one tablet when he has had difficulty sleeping. He is asking for a prescription for lorazepam to
help him sleep. Which is the best recommendation for this patient?
A. Give him a prescription for lorazepam 0.5 mg at bedtime.
B. Have him take diphenhydramine 50 mg at bedtime.
C. Change the selegiline dosing from twice daily to morning and noon.
D. Add levodopa/carbidopa to selegiline.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-498
Table 31. Medications for the Treatment of Symptoms in PD
Min-Max Daily
Drug Name Mechanism Dosage Forms Adverse Effects Comments
Dose
Benztropine Anticholinergic/ 0.5–4 mg Tablet, injections Confusion, dry mouth, constipation, Most useful for tremor, but not
(Cogentin) antimuscarinic blurred vision, tachycardia, urinary well tolerated, particularly in
retention patients > 65–70 years
Trihexyphenidyl Anticholinergic/ 1–6 mg Tablet, elixir Confusion, dry mouth, constipation, Most useful for tremor, but not
(Artane) antimuscarinic blurred vision, tachycardia, urinary well tolerated, particularly in
retention patients > 65–70 years
Diphenhydramine Anticholinergic/ 75–200 mg; Caplet, capsule, liquid Confusion, dry mouth, constipation, Most useful for tremor, but not
(Benadryl) antimuscarinic divided doses blurred vision, tachycardia, urinary well tolerated, particularly in
retention patients > 65–70 years
Levodopa/carbi- Dopamine 300–1000 mg of IR tablet and orally Nausea, vomiting, hallucinations, Most clinically effective
dopa (Sinemet, precursor levodopa; several disintegrating tablets: delusions, syncope, arrhythmias, treatment available for PD
Rytary, Duopa) daily doses 100/10, 100/25, 250/25 edema, hypotension motor symptoms
mg;
ER tablet: 100/25,
200/50 mg
1-499
Neurology
Rytary: 95/23.75,
145/36.25, 195/48.75,
245/61.25 mg;
Duopa: 4.63–20 mg/
mL
Pramipexole Dopamine 0.375–4.5 mg; IR tablet: 0.125, 0.25, Nausea, vomiting, hallucinations, Not as clinically effective as
(Mirapex; agonist divided doses 0.5, 1, 1.5 mg somnolence, postural hypotension, levodopa, but associated with
Mirapex ER) ER tablet: 0.375, 0.75, dizziness, confusion, edema, fewer motor complications long
1.5, 3, 4.5 mg dyskinesia term; when switching from IR
to ER, use ER dose that most
closely matches daily IR dose
Ropinirole Dopamine 0.75–24 mg; IR tablet: 0.25, 0.5, Nausea, vomiting, hallucinations, Not as clinically effective as
(Requip, Requip agonist divided doses 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 mg; XL somnolence, postural hypotension, levodopa, but associated with
XL) tablets: 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 mg dizziness, confusion, edema, fewer motor complications long
dyskinesia term; when switching from IR
to XL, use XL dose that most
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
closely matches daily IR dose
Table 31. Medications for the Treatment of Symptoms in PD (continued)
Min-Max Daily
Drug Name Mechanism Dosage Forms Adverse Effects Comments
Dose
Apomorphine Dopamine 2–6 mg per Injection; 10 mg/mL, Angina, drowsiness, hypotension, Administered subcutaneously
(Apokyn) agonist injection 2- or 3-mL multidose nausea, vomiting, edema, falls for intermittent freezing
cartridge episodes
Entacapone COMT inhibitor 200–1600 mg in Tablet: 200 mg; Nausea, dyskinesias, postural Not to be used as monotherapy;
(Comtan, Stalevo) divided doses; combination prod- hypotension, diarrhea, abdominal only in combination with
200 mg with uct with levodopa/ pain, brown-orange urine, levodopa treatment
each levodopa carbidopa/entacapone hyperkinesia
dose (Stalevo); 50/12.5/200,
100/25/200,
150/37.5/200 mg
Selegiline MAO-B 5–10 mg Tablet: 5 mg; orally Headache, insomnia, hallucinations, Orally disintegrating tablet
(Eldepryl) inhibitor disintegrating tablet: dizziness has better bioavailability than
1.25 mg oral tablet; risk of tyramine
reactions very low within
recommended dosage range
1-500
Neurology
Rasagiline MAO-B 0.5–1 mg Tablet: 0.5, 1 mg Postural hypotension, dyskinesias, Risk of tyramine reactions
(Azilect) inhibitor headache, nausea, weight loss very low within recommended
dosage range
COMT = catechol-O-methyl transferase; ER/XL = extended release; IR = immediate release; MAO = monoamine oxidase; max = maximal; min = minimal; PD = Parkinson disease.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
Neurology
i. Initial therapy
i. Therapy generally initiated when symptoms become sufficiently bothersome to patient
functioning
ii. Dopaminergic agents (levodopa, dopamine agonists) are generally preferred as initial therapy
because of their superior control of motor symptoms.
iii. MAO-B inhibitors (selegiline, rasagiline) can be considered in patients with mild symptoms
before initiating dopaminergic treatments.
iv. Motor control: Levodopa > dopamine agonist > MAO-B
v. Risk of dyskinesias or motor complications: Levodopa > dopamine agonists
vi. Hallucinations: Dopamine agonists > levodopa
vii. No clear evidence that using sustained-release levodopa provides advantages relative to
immediate-release levodopa
j. Add-on therapy
i. If treatment is initiated with a dopamine agonist and unable to control motor symptoms,
levodopa should be considered.
ii. If treatment is initiated with levodopa, can consider adding agents if total daily levodopa dose
is 800–1000 mg; choice of agent depends on patient characteristics.
iii. If adding on therapy, need to watch closely for complications of excess dopaminergic response
(e.g., dyskinesias, nausea and vomiting, hallucinations); adding therapy to levodopa may
necessitate a decrease in the levodopa dose.
k. Motor complications (wearing off, on-off phenomenon, freezing)
i. To reduce off time, a MAO-B inhibitor, COMT inhibitor, or dopamine agonist can be considered.
ii. End-of-dose wearing off occurs because of shorter duration of individual doses of levodopa;
can consider increasing frequency of levodopa dosing; if not helpful, consider adding MAO-B
inhibitor, COMT inhibitor, or dopamine agonist.
iii. Freezing episodes: Add a dopamine agonist or MAO-B inhibitor; intermittent apomorphine;
physiotherapy and assistive walking devices and sensory cues.
l. Psychiatric symptoms
i. Depression
(a) Can occur in 40%–70% of patients with PD
(b) Limited evidence to support use of specific antidepressants in PD; medications studied
include amitriptyline, nortriptyline, citalopram, fluoxetine, sertraline, and nefazodone.
(c) Use of tricyclic antidepressants may be theoretically beneficial because of anticholinergic
effects; however, cognitive effects limit utility.
ii. Hallucinations
(a) Can be associated with PD itself, as well as with therapies to treat PD
(b) Can try to decrease dopaminergic therapies; however, will likely result in poorer motor
symptom control. Dopamine agonist is more likely to cause hallucinations relative to
dopamine; selegiline is associated with hallucinations as well.
(c) Clozapine and quetiapine may be considered to treat troublesome hallucinations in PD.
Use of antipsychotics in this situation is not without risk, and each situation requires a
careful review of risk-benefit. Hallucinations that are particularly troubling for a patient
may justify the use of an antipsychotic; metabolic complications have been associated
with the use of atypical agents, and clozapine is associated with agranulocytosis;
olanzapine worsens motor symptom control when used to treat hallucinations in PD.
m. Orthostasis
i. Orthostatic hypotension can be a complication of the disease itself, as well as the medications
to treat the disease, particularly dopaminergic treatments.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-501
Neurology
ii. Blood pressure (sitting and standing) should be evaluated at each visit. Patients being treated for
hypertension should have antihypertensive therapies evaluated closely, particularly if used in
combination with dopaminergic treatments. Falls and fall-related injuries are common among
patients with PD.
iii. In patients with problematic orthostasis, medications that can cause orthostasis should be
evaluated closely (e.g., dopaminergic therapies, antihypertensives) to determine continued need;
if this does not adequately address the problem, other considerations may include compression
stockings, increased sodium intake, or fludrocortisone or midodrine treatment.
n. Neuroprotection
i. Selegiline, rasagiline – Inconclusive evidence that these provide neuroprotection; theory
related to decrease in oxidative metabolism of dopamine; DATATOP study suggested delay
in progression of disease with selegiline; however, symptomatic benefit of the drug clouds the
interpretation of neuroprotective effects.
ii. Dopamine agonists – Inconclusive evidence of neuroprotective effect; imaging studies (REAL-
PET, CALM-PD) suggest neuroprotective effects, but it is difficult to translate these findings to
clinical practice.
iii. Several other agents studied for neuroprotection (nicotine, caffeine, coenzyme Q10, exenatide,
deferiprone,amantadine, and NMDA receptor modulators)
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-502
Neurology
Patient Cases
29. A 66-year-old man with a diagnosis of PD is being examined today in the clinic. He has been taking levodopa/
carbidopa for 6 years. His current levodopa/carbidopa dose is 100/25 mg, 1½ tablets in the morning, 1 tablet at
11 a.m., 1 tablet at 2 p.m., 1 tablet at 5 p.m., and ½ tablet at 8 p.m. He has been experiencing motor complications
for about 3 months, including on-off symptoms and freezing episodes. On physical examination, he has some
weakness, gait and balance abnormalities, and rigidity. His ability to ambulate and perform self-care activities
during the past 3 months has continued to decline. Which is the most appropriate recommendation for this
man’s symptoms?
A. Add benztropine to levodopa/carbidopa.
B. Decrease the levodopa/carbidopa dose to 4 tablets daily.
C. Switch to levodopa/carbidopa CR.
D. Add entacapone to levodopa/carbidopa.
30. The 66-year-old patient in the previous question returns to the clinic 2 weeks after your recommendation
above. He states that, overall, he thinks he is doing better, but that he often feels nauseated and occasionally
feels light-headed or dizzy. He also describes some abnormal movements, which are identified as dyskinesias
on physical examination. He also states that he has experienced hallucinations on two occasions, which was
rather disturbing to him. Which is the most appropriate recommendation for this man?
A. Add prochlorperazine for nausea.
B. Decrease the daily dose of levodopa/carbidopa.
C. Initiate rasagiline therapy.
D. Initiate ropinirole therapy.
C. Treatment Options
1. AAN has published guidelines for the treatment of ET
2. Level A – Established as effective
a. Propranolol (40–160 mg/day) – The only treatment that is FDA approved for ET
i. Titrate to response.
ii. Absence of β1 selectivity is preferred when treating tremors.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-503
Neurology
Patient Case
31. A 62-year-old patient with a diagnosis of ET is in the clinic today for an evaluation. His tremor was initially
treated with propranolol, but he was unable to tolerate it because of significant dizziness and orthostasis.
He has been treated with primidone 250 mg for almost 12 weeks, but his symptoms are not appreciably
improved by either his report or his physical examination. Which treatment would be most appropriate to
consider for this man’s symptoms?
A. Nimodipine.
B. Gabapentin.
C. Levetiracetam.
D. Zonisamide.
Special Acknowledgments
Felecia Hart, Pharm.D., Neurology Clinical Research Fellow
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-504
Neurology
REFERENCES
Epilepsy evidence-based review): vitamin K, folic acid,
1. Arain AM. Pregabalin in the management of partial blood levels, and breastfeeding: report of the
epilepsy. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2009;5:407-13. Quality Standards Subcommittee and Therapeutics
2. Birbeck GL, French JA, Perucca E, et al. Evidence- and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the
based guideline: antiepileptic drug selection for American Academy of Neurology and American
people with HIV/AIDS: report of the Quality Epilepsy Society. Neurology 2009;73:142-9.
Standards Subcommittee of the American 8. Hernandez-Diaz S, Smith CR, Shen A, et al.
Academy of Neurology and the Ad Hoc Task Force Comparative safety of antiepileptic drugs during
of the Commission on Therapeutic Strategies of the pregnancy. Neurology 2012;78:1692
International League Against Epilepsy. Neurology 9. Lowenstein DH, Alldredge BK. Status epilepticus.
2012;78:139-45. N Engl J Med 1998;338:970-6.
3. French JA, Kanner AM, Bautista J, et al. 10. Potiga [package insert]. Greenville, NC:
Efficacy and tolerability of the new antiepilep- GlaxoSmithKline, 2011.
tic drugs, I: treatment of new onset epilepsy: 11. Rogers SJ, Cavazos JE. Chapter 40: Epilepsy.
report of the Therapeutics and Technology In: DiPiro JT, Talbert RL, Yee GC,et al., eds.
Assessment Subcommittee and Quality Standards Pharmacotherapy: A Pathophysiologic Approach,
Subcommittee of the American Academy of 9th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2014.
Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society. Available at http://accesspharmacy.mhmedi-
Neurology 2004;62:1252-60. ca l.com /cont ent.aspx?book id= 689&Se ct io
4. French JA, Kanner AM, Bautista J, et al. nid=45310490. Accessed March 2, 2015.
Efficacy and tolerability of the new antiepilep-
tic drugs, II: treatment of refractory epilepsy: Headaches/Migraine
report of the Therapeutics and Technology 1. Comparison of available triptans. Pharmacist’s
Assessment Subcommittee and Quality Standards Letter/Prescriber’s Letter 2009;25:250509.
Subcommittee for the American Academy of 2. Derry CJ, Derry S, Moore RA. Sumatriptan (subcu-
Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society. taneous route of administration) for acute migraine
Neurology 2004;62:1261-73. attacks in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
5. Harden CL, Hopp TY, Ting TY, et al. Practice 2012;2:CD009665.
parameter update: management issues for women 3. Dowson AJ, Lipscombe S, Sender J, et al. New
with epilepsy: focus on pregnancy (an evidence- guidelines for the management of migraine in pri-
based review): obstetrical complications and mary care. Curr Med Res Opin 2002;18:414-39.
change in seizure frequency: report of the Quality 4. Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Rush SR, et al. Migraine
Standards Subcommittee and Therapeutics and practice patterns among neurologists. Neurology
Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the 2004;62:1926-31.
American Academy of Neurology and American 5. Minor DS, Wofford MR. Chapter 45: Headache
Epilepsy Society. Neurology 2009;73:126-32. disorders. In: DiPiro JT, Talbert RL, Yee GC, et
6. Harden CL, Meador KJ, Pennell PB, et al. Practice al., eds. Pharmacotherapy: A Pathophysiologic
parameter update: management issues for women Approach, 9th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-
with epilepsy focus on pregnancy (an Hill, 2014. Available at http://accesspharmacy.
evidence-based review): teratogenesis and peri- mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=689&Sectio
natal outcomes: report of the Quality Standards nid=45310495. Accessed March 2, 2015.
Subcommittee and Therapeutics and Technology 6. Morey SS. Practice guidelines: guidelines on
Assessment Subcommittee of the American migraine, part 3: recommendations for individ-
Academy of Neurology and American Epilepsy ual drugs. Am Fam Physician 2000;15. Available
Society. Neurology 2009;73:133-41. at www.aafp.org/ afp/20001101/practice.html.
7. Harden CL, Meador KJ, Pennell PB, et al. Accessed February 10, 2012.
Practice parameter update: management issues
for women with epilepsy focus on pregnancy (an
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-505
Neurology
7. Papetti L, Spalice A, Nicita F, et al. Migraine treat- 6. Federation of State Medical Boards of the United
ment in developmental age: guidelines update. J States. Model Policy on the Use of Opioid
Headache Pain 2010;11:267-76. Analgesics in the Treatment of Chronic Pain. July
8. Ramadan NM, Silberstein SD, Freitag FG, et al. 2013. Available at www.fsmb.org/pdf/pain_policy_
Evidence-Based Guidelines for Migraine Headache july2013.pdf. Accessed December 15, 2013.
in the Primary Care Setting: Pharmacological 7. Fitzcharles MA, Ste-Marie PA, Goldenberg DL, et
Management for Prevention of Migraine. St. Paul, al. 2012 Canadian Guidelines for the Diagnosis and
MN: American Academy of Neurology, 2000. Management of Fibromyalgia Syndrome. Available
Available at www.aan.com/professionals/practice/ at www.canadianpainsociety.ca/pdf/Fibromyalgia_
pdfs/gl0090.pdf. Accessed February 10, 2012. Guidelines_2012.pdf. Accessed October 30, 2013.
9. Silberstein SD. Practice parameter: evidence-based 8. Fudin J. Urine Drug Screen Algorithm. Available
guidelines for migraine headache (an evidence- at http://paindr.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/
based review): report of the Quality Standards Urine-Drug-Screen-Algorithm.pdf. Accessed
Subcommittee of the American Academy of October 30, 2012.
Neurology. Neurology 2000;55:754-62. 9. Hachberg MC, Altman R, April KT, et al. American
10. Silbertein SD, Holland S, Freitag F, et al. Evidence- College of Rheumatology 2012 recommendations
based guideline update: pharmacologic treatment for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmaco-
for episodic migraine prevention in adults: report logic therapies in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip,
of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the and knee. Arthritis Care Res 2012;64:465-74.
American Academy of Neurology and the American 10. Heit H, Gourlay D. Urine drug testing in pain med-
Headache Society. Neurology 2012;78:1337. icine. J Pain Symptom Manage 2004;27:260-7.
11. Krantz MJ, Martin J, Stimmel B, et al. QTc interval
Pain Management screening in methadone treatment. Ann Intern Med
1. Carville SF, Arendt-Nielsen, Bliddal H, et al. 2009;150:387-95.
EULAR evidence-based recommendations for 12. McPherson ML. Demystifying Opioid Conversion
the management of fibromyalgia syndrome. Ann Calculations: A Guide for Effective Dosing.
Rheum Dis 2008;67:536-41. Bethesda, MD: American Society of Health-
2. Chou R, Fanciullo GJ, Fine PG, et al. Clinical System Pharmacists, 2010:1-196.
guidelines for the use of chronic opioid therapy in 13. Moeller KE, Lee KC, Kissack JC. Urine drug
chronic noncancer pain. J Pain 2009;10:113-30. screening: practical guide for clinicians. Mayo Clin
3. Chou R, Huffman LH. Medications for acute and Proc 2008;83:66-76.
chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for 14. Nalamachu SR. Opioid rotation in clinical practice.
an American Pain Society/American College of Adv Ther 2012;29:849-63.
Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern 15. Vargas-Schaeffer G. Is the WHO analgesic ladder
Med 2007;147:505-14. still valid? Can Fam Physician 2010;56:514-7.
4. Chou R, Qaseem A, Snow V, et al. Diagnosis and 16. Washington State Agency Medical Directors’
treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice Group (AMDG). Interagency Guideline on Opioid
guideline from the American College of Physicians Dosing for Chronic Non-cancer Pain: 2010 Update.
and the American Pain Society. Ann Intern Med Available at www.agencymeddirectors.wa.gov/
2007;147:478-91. Files/OpioidGdline.pdf. Accessed December 15,
5. Department of Veterans Affairs. VA/DoD Clinical 2013.
Practice Guideline for Management of Opioid 17. Woolf CJ. Pain: moving from symptom control
Therapy for Chronic Pain. May 2010. Available toward mechanism-specific pharmacologic man-
at www.healthquality.va.gov/cot/cot_310_sum.pdf. agement. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:441-51.
Accessed December 15, 2013.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-506
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-507
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-508
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-509
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-510
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-511
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-512
Neurology
29. Answer: D
The occurrence of motor complications (wearing off,
on-off, freezing) is common with chronic levodopa therapy.
Adjusting the dose or timing of levodopa administration
might help symptoms in some instances (wearing off), but
it would not likely improve symptoms in others (on-off,
freezing). Practice guidelines of the American Academy of
Neurology recommend adding a MAO-B inhibitor, COMT
inhibitor, or dopamine agonist for treatment of patients
with motor complications, such as for this patient. Using an
anticholinergic agent or switching from immediate-release
levodopa preparations to sustained-release preparations is
not recommended in this instance. Entacapone is available
as a separate agent that can be added to levodopa/carbidopa.
The branded product containing levodopa/carbidopa/
entacapone should not be crushed or broken; therefore, using
separate products should be recommended in this instance.
30. Answer: B
Abnormal involuntary movements (e.g., dyskinesias)
suggest excessive dopaminergic treatment. When a second
agent is added to levodopa therapy, whether it is a MAO-B
inhibitor, COMT inhibitor, or dopamine agonist, most
patients require a decrease in their levodopa dose to avoid
possible dopamine-related adverse effects (dyskinesias,
nausea or vomiting, hallucinations). Decreasing the
levodopa dose would be the best initial approach to
managing this problem. Adding rasagiline would not help
these symptoms and would most likely make them worse.
Adding prochlorperazine would be counterproductive
because it possesses dopamine-blocking effects, and
adding a drug to treat the adverse effects of another drug
should be avoided if possible. Anticholinergic agents would
not be effective in this case, and they are poorly tolerated.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-513
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-514
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-515
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-516
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-517
Neurology
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-518
Neurology
31. Answer: D
The common adverse effects of levodopa at initiation
of therapy include nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and
hypotension. Adding a dopa decarboxylase inhibitor
such as carbidopa can considerably reduce these
peripheral adverse effects. The dose of carbidopa needed
to saturate peripheral dopa decarboxylase is between 75
and 100 mg/day. This patient is only receiving 30 mg
of carbidopa daily. Changing the levodopa/carbidopa
dosage formulation from 100/10 mg three times daily to
100/25 mg three times daily would increase the carbidopa
intake to 75 mg/day. Adding rasagiline to levodopa
therapy would not resolve the patient’s symptoms, and
it might actually make them worse. Decreasing the
levodopa/carbidopa 100/10 mg dose from three times
daily to twice daily might reduce the adverse effects, but
the carbidopa dose would still be insufficient, and the
lower daily levodopa dose might reduce the control of
her PD symptoms.
32. Answer: B
Abnormal involuntary movements such as dyskinesias
suggest excessive dopaminergic treatment. Nausea in
the context of abnormal involuntary movements can
also be a sign of excessive dopaminergic treatment.
When a second drug is added to levodopa therapy,
whether it is a MAO-B inhibitor, a COMT inhibitor, or a
dopamine agonist, most patients will require a decrease
in the levodopa dose to avoid possible dopamine-
related adverse effects (dyskinesias, nausea or vomiting,
hallucinations). Decreasing the levodopa dose would
be the best initial approach to managing this problem.
Changing from rasagiline to selegiline or ropinirole
would still be associated with a similar problem and
would likely necessitate a reduction in the levodopa dose.
ACCP Updates in Therapeutics® 2016: Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course
1-519