Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sara Thompson
Post University
Case study 27 Rapid Design Approach to Designing Instruction was chosen for this
course project for two reasons (Hendel-Giller & Stepich, 2017). First, this writer’s instructional
development experiences are in higher education and this case would expand my knowledge to
enterprises. Secondly, this writer’s approach to instructional design is still in development, prior
development experiences did not follow a rapid design approach, thus it will be interesting to
analyze a rapid design approach outside of higher education. A reflective case study approach
benefits this case to ascertain content relevancy, meaning and is useable, while understanding
there is more than one way to design this training; therefore, stakeholders must be flexible, have
an open mind to other design suggestions, and continually reflect in order to make revisions that
improve the training (Ertmer, Quinn, & Glazawski, 2017). In sum, this particular case study was
selected to challenge this writer’s instructional design and analysis skill set.
Initial Questions
2. The timeline is expected to be aggressive, when must this training be completed by?
3. Are leaders and supervisors aware that this training is being developed?
Potential Challenges
This writer made this note while reading the case “challenge-started with new reps and
not the supervisors”, interestingly this is a point one of the designers also highlighted. Without
this training, the agency is in jeopardy of employee turnover which is extremely costly. The buy
in of supervisors, who the training is designed for may be a challenge since this training comes
after the fact (i.e. after being hired and working in their position for some time now).
3
References
Hendel-Giller, R., & Stepich, D. A. (2017). Case study 27 Rapid design approach to designing
Ertmer, P. A., Quinn, J. A., & Glazawski, K. D. (2017). The ID casebook: Case studies in