BIOREACTORS FOR THE TREATMENT OF LAND FILL LEACHATE

Submitted by: Madhu H

Department of Chemical Engineering

Abstract

Bioreactor landfill is system used to treat degradable waste by creating suitable environment for
controlling nitrification, bioreactor kinetics, moisture conditions and pH. From economical point
of view in situ leachate treatment is cheaper and also enhance landfill gas generation and
anerobic condition is preferred to increase leachate quality, and maintenance is feasible.
Treatment is required for reducing pollution impact on environment. The bioreactor is practiced
to generate gas for commercial purpose and maximizing the land space used for disposing solid
waste. The bioreactors are preffered for decomposition of landfill leachate because if directly
disposed landfill effluent may pollute and hazard the soil surface, underground water and surface
water so there is necessity of filtering the landfill effluents before disposing. The solid waste
from municipal is dumped into sites without any treatment and if the water and moisture is get
added into dumps it form leachate and fouling smell which is hazards. The study tells about the
AnMBR highlights the benefits, limitation, future perspective on landfill leachate treatment.

Introduction:

The essential capacity of the bioreactor landfill is to quicken the decompose of MSW.
Exploration shows that a bioreactor may produce LFG (landfill gas) prior and at a higher rate
than customary dry landfills. In a bioreactor, LFG is additionally created throughout a more
limited timeframe in light of the fact that LFG age decreases as the quickened decay measure
exhausts the source squander. The net outcome gives off an impression of being that the
bioreactor creates more LFG during the period when the landfill is working, than the customary
landfill. Most present day MSWLFs (City Strong Waste Landfills) don't introduce gas
assortment frameworks until after site conclusion and landfill covering is finished. A common
bioreactor will have and work gas frameworks during the dynamic existence of the landfill and
gather and control gas throughout a more limited timeframe.
Fluid Addition: The expansion of dampness to quicken or improve the anaerobic biodegrada-
landfilled squander establishes a climate favor-tion of the waste." capable for those life forms
liable for squander deterioration. The dampness accessible in the waste is generally not adequate
to meet the mi-crobial necessities, so plan and operational alterations are expected to add fluids
to the landfill squander. Distribution of leachate is the most well-known fluid stock, yet other
dampness sources can likewise be utilized.

Air Addition: Elective component proposed for some bioreactor landfills is the expansion of air.
The expansion of air, and consequently oxygen, advances the high-impact adjustment of the
landfilled squander. This is the very cycle that decays squander in a conventional waste fertilizer
framework. Vigorous waste deterioration is a quicker cycle correlation with anaerobic waste
decay. The high-impact procedure might be useful.

Different Elements: While dampness expansion, and less significantly air expansion, are the
essential innovations for upgrading waste adjustment in controlled bioreactor land-fills, other
landfill ecological conditions are at times proposed for control too. These incorporates
temperature, pH, and supplement level. Ideal temperature is between 34 to 40 C for the
mesophilic microorganisms and up to 70 C for thermophilec miniature creatures [1]. In cool
locales, low temperatures can be issue, so circulating air through landfilled squander is utilized to
warm up in the beginning period of anaerobic bioreactor. In working an oxygen consuming
bioreactor, temperature control is basic issue to keep from bursting an into flames. pH influences
on the action of methane shaping microorganisms. The scope of 6.8 to 7.4 is known as the ideal
pH for the methane framing microscopic organisms [2]. Supplement and microorganism
expansion isn't normal, and is commonly assessed as not required.
 This schematic diagram shows major components of a anaerobic bioreactor landfill including leachate/mois- ture
addition system, gas recovery system, bottom liner system and leachate collection system.

Types of bioreactor

1. Aerobic bioreactor
2. Anaerobic bioreactor
3. Semi aerobic bioreactor
4. Hybrid bioreactor

Aerobic bioreactor

In a Aerobic bioreactor landfill, leachate is eliminated from the base layer and recycled into the
landfill in a controlled way. Air is all the while infused into the waste mass, utilizing vertical or
flat wells, to advance oxygen consuming movement and quicken squander disintegration.

Anaerobic bioreactor

In an anaerobic bioreactor landfill, dampness is added to the waste mass inside the sort of re-
coursed leachate and other water to get ideal dampness levels. No extra air is added to the
landfill, since the plan is to push an anaerobic climate. Biodegradation, by anaerobic microbes,
happens inside the nonappearance of oxygen. As a consequences of waste debasement, this cycle
produces landfill gas. This gas, essentially (CO2), and methane (CH4), will be caught to constrict
nursery discharge outflows and for energy creation.

Hybrid (Aerobic-Anaerobic) bioreactor

The hybrid bioreactor landfill accelerates waste degradation by employing a sequential aerobic-
anaerobic treatment to rapidly degrade organics within the upper sections of the landfill and
collect gas from lower sections. Operation as a hybrid ends up in the sooner onset of
methanogenesis (operation as an anaerobic bioreactor) compared to the standard “dry tomb”
landfill where no liquids are added.

Municipal Solid Waste Parameters

a. Waste Temperature Squander temperature is estimated utilizing thermocouples as frequently as
each 20 feet bgs to inside 10-15 feet of the liner in retrofit bioreactors. In recently built landfills,
thermocouples are commonly added to each other lift with at least one for every two sections of
land. Temperature fills in as a pointer of organic movement and as a fire counteraction apparatus
in case of over the top temperature increment.

b. Cellulose/Lignin Cellulose and lignin are found in wood and paper items related with strong
waste. Cellulose is promptly degradable under anaerobic conditions while lignin debases
gradually. New waste can be relied upon to have huge measures of cellulose. The percent
cellulose will diminish as the landfill ages while lignin will stay steady or reduction gradually.
The investigation of cellulose and lignin (C/L proportion) in waste has customarily been utilized
to decide the solidness of strong waste and has been demonstrated to be a dependable pointer.
Exploration recommends that the C/L proportion is high in new waste and diminishes drastically
with squander age. Tragically, while the investigation is tedious and costly, unpredictable solids
might be subbed.

c. Unpredictable Solids (Versus) This investigation is a cheap estimation of the measure of

biodegradable material that is staying in the waste mass. The test comprises of the high
temperature demolition (55° C) of unstable organics decided when test loads. Unpredictable
solids results have been appeared to correspond directly with cellulose and cellulose/lignin
information (Ham, 1987). In addition, the investigation is about 10% of the expense of the
cellulose/lignin examination. In high plastic substance tests the qualities are in some cases
somewhat swelled. Luckily, the method is modest enough that adequate repeats could be taken to
acquire measurably solid information.

d. Biochemical Methane Potential (BMP) BMP (Hilger and Barlaz, 2000) is a proportion of the
volume of methane that can be delivered per gram of strong waste under ideal conditions in the
research facility. This is an immediate marker of the measure of lingering biodegradable material
in the strong waste. This test gives off an impression of being critical when assessing total
adjustment and landfill conclusion. BMP combined with Unpredictable Solids should give an all
out estimation of the leftover biodegradable mass.
e. Dampness Content: Dampness content is significant for the forecast of how much water is as yet
required and if the conveyance of fluids is sufficient. There is guarantee that set up dampness
meters will sometime supplant this test. A huge example size is imperative to keep away from
off base lab investigation.

f. pH Field pH estimation of rubbish straightforwardly after examining is an important instrument

for the estimation of the phase of landfill biodegradation.

Bioreactor Landfill Essentials:

Bioreactor landfills offer a few likely advantages, yet they can be a reason for concern if
bioreactor tasks, for example, leachate distribution are not performed effectively. A couple of the
more normal concerns are de-scribed here. Potential strategies for forestall ing and moderating
these worries are additionally portrayed here in a nutshell.

Leachate Leaks: When the fluids are added at a high weight or at a stream rate higher than the
nearby penetration rate or abdominal muscle sorption limit of the waste mass, there is a chance
of leaks. Leaks might be ob-served along the slants of the landfills where leachate front meets
the every day cover because of particular stream ways and diverting. Leachate leaks are talked
about in detail later in this guide.

Landfill Incline Dependability: Since fluids are added in the bioreactor, inner pore water pres-
sures can possibly increment and in this way decline the shear strength of the waste. Inordinate
pore water weights can cause slant disappointments.
Temperature Control: Oxygen consuming waste debasement expands squander temperature
essentially. The expanded temperature, if not controlled, can cause fires. Temperature rise can be
constrained by halting air infusion subsequently cutting the wellspring of oxygen, recycling cold
leachate and com-pletely wetting the specific area.

Gas and Smell Control: Gas creation is upgraded at bioreactors. In the event that the gas isn't
controlled, smells and other ecological issues with gas can result.

Fire and Blasts: The essential concern while working a high-impact bioreactor is the po-tential
for combustibility and unstable gas blends including oxygen and methane. The combustibility
range for methane is somewhere in the range of 5% and 14% yet this lone alludes to the flam-
mability of methane with air. At the point when nitrogen and other diluent gases are available,
this reach is diminished. The other worry with the vigorous bioreactor is unconstrained fire. In a
vigorous bioreactor air is infused in the bioreactor to elevate oxygen consuming microorgan-isms
to decay the waste. The oxygen consuming action creates high temperature. At plac-es because
of high temperature and low dampness content sudden ignition may happen. So temperature
checking at various loca-tions and profundity of the high-impact landfill is significant.

Leachate Pre-treatment problems

A few analysts in the field of bioreactors prescribe certain changes to or pre-treatment of

leachate that will be recycled.

The most well-known proposals include:

• Supplement enlargement:

MSW leachate is now and again insufficient in supplements. Notwithstanding, the expansion of
synthetic supplements, for example, phosphate and nitrate doesn't appear to give any further
improvement since a supplement shortfall is commonly not a restricting variable in a landfill
anaerobic corruption.

• Warming:

Some propose that raising the temperature of the leachate preceding renewed introduction into
the landfill would be helpful. The theory is that since natural action is more productive at higher
temperatures, warming leachate will assist with kicking "start" the organic cycles. Ongoing
group insight in Canada proposes that huge volumes of leachate under 50°F should be
maintained a strategic distance from in enormous amounts in view of the capability of cooling
the whole mass.

• Treatment:

A few specialists feel that a pH change and filtration framework should be introduced to
incompletely treat and change the pH of leachate, particularly after numerous goes through the
waste mass.

portrays a commonplace gas creation bends from a dry burial chamber landfill and a bioreactor
mimicking the normal first request organic decay rate (K) expected under bioreactor activity
versus the Caption D landfill without any fluids added utilizing USEPA's Landgem model.

The essential objectives in the plan of a fluids distribution framework are to give

• a fluids appropriation framework that will permit uniform presentation of leachate or other
fluids into the waste material;

• a climate that improves biodegradation;

• a framework that is viable with ordinary landfill tasks and material;

a framework that can endure typical landfill activities and settlement;

• a framework that stays away from scents;

• a framework that limits administrator consideration;

• a financially savvy framework.

Depending on the type of bioreactor, leachate/water distribution can occur in one or more
of the following ways.
• Splash application: This is maybe the most simple type of fluids distribution. Shower
application regularly includes splashing leachate at the working face from a nozzled hose
associated with big hauler truck. While this strategy is compelling for wetting the waste, laborers'
(landfill staff and waste haulers) wellbeing introduction impacts should be thought of.

• Vertical wells: Plastic punctured line is commonly introduced in a network style into the waste
fill. Leachate is siphoned to the wells and is permitted to deplete by gravity or is pressurized for
appropriation to the encompassing waste.

• Level channels: (See Figures 3-4 and 3-5) Punctured line is laid in porous rock packs inside
channels. Leachate is siphoned to the channeling and either depletes by gravity or constrained to
the encompassing waste. As landfill lifts are built, the former channel is put unavailable and
another one is placed into administration.

• Surface lakes: Unearthings are made at the landfill surface into the waste layer. Leachate is
siphoned out of the shadows exhuming and permitted to deplete by gravity.

• Surface channels: A progression of long limited channels are burrowed at the landfill surface.
Leachate is siphoned out of the shadows exhuming and permitted to deplete by gravity.

Design Components

Liners: Guidelines take into account adaptability for utilization of single composite liners, single
non-composite blended composite liners, and twofold liner frameworks with spill discovery
frameworks. Despite the fact that the USEPA RD&D rule takes into account fluids distribution
on elective liners, most states require standard composite liner frameworks. Numerous in the
waste business comprehend that basically every liner will release some sum given development
defects and material weakness with time. They acknowledge, regardless of whether more costly
to build, the repetition in of composite liner frameworks as adding an additional degree of
defense and obligation the executives. Distribution on essential PVC liners should be debilitate
since these liners will in general lose versatility after some time (Koerner et al 1988). Similarity
testing may should be performed relying upon the sort of liner framework materials chose.
Leachate Collection and Removal Systems:

Leachate assortment frameworks for landfills and bioreactor frameworks should be intended to
productively gather, eliminate, and oversee leachate. The Government and most State guidelines
necessitate that the stature of leachate head on the essential liner be under 30 cm (1 foot) to limit
the danger of groundwater defilement. Assessment of site explicit leachate qualities to limit
obstructing from particulates (TS, TDS, TSS), organic specialists (COD, Body, TOC) and
hastens should be directed to guarantee the adequacy of the plan. As leachate is traveling through
the waste mass at adequate amounts for field ability to be kept up, the leachate assortment
framework should have adequate seepage capacity. Most state guidelines require a base pressure
driven conductivity of 0.01 cm/sec for the waste media to sufficiently pass on leachate to the
funneling dissemination framework. This worth might be excessively low for adequate waste in
fluids distribution frameworks. Thusly, the leachate assortment media ought to have a
penetrability of more noteworthy than 1.0 cm/sec.

The drawn out penetrability of granular seepage material should be assessed since the base of the
landfill should work during the lifetime of bioreactor tasks. Retrofitting a bioreactor on a current
landfill ought to assess existing leachate assortment plan since fix, evacuation or substitution of
the framework is cost restrictive. Leachate assortment frameworks in traditional landfills that
have joined geotextiles (as a line cover) or sand as a seepage media are probably going to
encounter an abatement in water driven conductivities somewhere in the range of one and two
significant degrees less during the operational existence of the office. Similarly, more natural
material can be relied upon to travel through the landfill and into the seepage framework during
the early bioreactor stages when the pore space is a lot higher in the waste mass than at later
stages, bringing about a lot higher potential to plug the waste framework prior all the while.
Materials, for example, insoluble total, with expanded and more supportable stream limit are
desirable over better material, for example, sand, which can advance stopping up of assortment
pipes. A punctured line network inside an appropriate material joined by a geonet is suggested.
Additionally wrapping geotextile texture around assortment lines to forestall fouling should be
kept away from. Furthermore, the planner should build up a reasonable stream limit.

Liquid circulation systems

An ideal leachate flow framework would be able to do viably immersing the waste and afterward
keeping up the loss at field limit. Leachate infusion line areas and dividing should be assessed by
an expert designer to guarantee consistency of fluid conveyance framework. The plan of a
funneling organization ought to consider the channel size and separating, and the infusion weight
and timetable. Additionally, fluid infusion lines and wells ought not be set too close to the edge
of the landfill to imperil incline dependability or start leaks. The framework ought to be able to
control stream to limit nearby pore pressures, piezometric head, and leakage powers. Admittance
to visit leachate assortment and evacuation framework cleaning should be planned considering
the way that expanded leachate stream rates may build the potential for stopping up. For
proficient bioreactor activities, even and vertical infusion frameworks may give the most solid
methods for recycling leachate all through the waste mass. Interior dampness dissemination is a
significant plan thought. Building such frameworks inside the waste mass may improve
dampness dissemination over that accomplished by streaming fluids down through the loss from
the highest point of the waste mass. This may assist with abstaining from mounding and the
issues related with special pathways or blockages creating around denser material. The number
and area of wells or channels needed for the even dispersion of leachate relies upon the
hydrodynamics of fluid course through a landfill. Keeping that in mind, program created by the
U.S. Geographical Study, named SUTRA (Immersed and Unsaturated Vehicle Model), was
created to reproduce leachate stream from vertical and level wells. Further plan direction
regarding this matter is accessible in Reinhart and Townsend (1999).

Landfill Gas Control and Recovery Systems

Fluids distribution in an anaerobic bioreactor will altogether build the pace of waste
disintegration and the pace of LFG age. The time reliance of the pinnacle accessibility of
methane (the main LFG part comparative with gas use) is central to fruitful landfill gas
recuperation and reuse ventures. Gas creation potential inside a dry landfill Through full-scale
fluids distribution, and a landfill bioreactor is volumetrically the landfill gas creation can be
relied upon to same. In any case, higher gas age rates increment by 2 to multiple times the
creation rate over more limited time periods are normal for a common landfill in the northeast
U.S. bioreactor landfills (a customary Caption D landfill produces 30% of absolute LFG by
season of conclusion while a bioreactor landfill can create over 80% during a similar period).
Therefore, the plan ought to think about the potential for LFG assortment and recuperation
because of more limited time period. The gas venting framework should be measured to deal
with the expanded gas creation rates. The plan should seriously mull over early establishment of
bigger assortment lines and blowers. Fluids distribution should be started just when the gas
venting framework is built and working. Gas assortment should be intended to work with
Bioreactor landfills should be planned and leachate assortment and distribution frameworks. built
to permit gas recuperation In most customary landfill plans, gas incidental with the start of
landfill assortment isn't started until after the last activity. landfill cover is built.
Notwithstanding, landfill gas the executives doesn't really control scents, for example, those
created at the working face. Working face scents should be controlled utilizing other
administration procedures.

Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR)

The sequencing batch reactor (SBR) is an activated sludge, biological nutrient removal
(nitrification/denitrification) process, based on a cycle of operation. Unlike conventional,
continuous-flow, activated-sludge systems, which have separate tanks for equalization, aeration,
and clarification, the SBR performs all operations in a single tank. Here’s what the E.P.A has to
say: “The SBR process has widespread application where mechanical treatment of small
wastewater flows is desired. Because it provides batch treatment…it is ideally suited for…. wide
variations in flow rates…operation in the “fill and draw” mode prevents the “washout” of
biological solids that often occurs with extended aeration system. Another advantage of SBR
system is that they require less operator attention yet produce a very high quality effluent.”

Each cycle of the batch operation involves five phases of treatment in time sequence, as
illustrated in Figure 2 and described below:

A. Fill-Leachate is taken care of to the sbr, which contains an adjusted biomass from the

B. Past cycle- Air circulation could possibly be given during the fill stage.

C. respond-The reactor substance are effectively blended and circulated air through to permit the
Microorganisms to vigorously corrupt the natural issue present in the leachate.
D. settle- Blending and air circulation are halted, and the suspended solids are permitted to settle
Under tranquil conditions.

E. draw-Explained supernatant is removed from the reactor for further treatment and

F. Release- inactive-Settled solids are held in the reactor for the following cycle. A part of the
Settled ooze might be squandered during the inert stage.

Conclusion

Bioreactor advantages as conclude in this document include:

• Efficient utilization of permitted landfill capacity by creating reusable air space

• Stabilization of waste in a shorter time, thereby reducing the potential release of constituents
from the landfill

• Reduced leachate handling cost by reusing the leachate in a leachate recirculation program

• Reduced post closure care by increasing the stability of the landfill and its constituents and
reducing the threat associated with potential release of constituents from the landfill. This could
translate into modification or termination of the post-closure care regulatory requirements and
ultimately custodial care as defined in ITRC’s ALT-4 2006 (in progress).

• Optimization of waste emplaced in a landfill • Landfill gas as a revenue stream. While both
conventional and bioreactor landfill can generate gas, bioreactors have the potential to generate
gas at a greater rate and by using more of the available gas generating material in the landfill.
Appropriate collection and management of the gas can generate more revenue quicker than
conventional landfills. This in turn may increase the economic viability of whether to utilize the
gas generated as a valuable commodity.

• Reduced air emissions containing VOC and haps by the degradation of constituents into less
noxious forms of the source chemicals. This could result in reduced post-closure care
requirements once the gas emissions are within regulatory limits.

• Gaining advantage from alternative cover designs by being amenable to covers that are less
prone to failure due to differential settlement. One key to the bioreactor process is to select.

• Diminished poisonousness of leachate and waste material through the adjustment, corruption as
well as sequestration of constituents in the waste; some of which could relocate and get entrained
in the leachate. Studies have indicated that bioreactor leachate contain diminished groupings of
constituents over the long haul, until the leachate eventually accomplishes pertinent drinking
water constituent focuses. This could convert into diminished post-conclusion care prerequisites.

• Consistency with economical landfill plan where the practical landfill idea mixes the
demonstration of permitting or empowering the set up waste to debase (organics) and
synthetically tie (inorganics) and afterward digging the corrupted material for recuperation and
reuse. Other ends and proposals distinguished in this direction include:

• The use of bioreactor innovation at an unlined landfill is troublesome from an administrative

viewpoint since fluid expansion is restricted in an unlined landfill. There might be abnormal
exemptions where normally happening shale or mud developments may be interpreted as a
satisfactory liner, anyway it could be: - regulatorily unfeasible and costly, - topographically
uncommon and costly, and the - designing is costly

• One of the main variables for ideal bioreactor execution is the uniform and persistent dispersion
of dampness inside the waste mass.

• Fluids distribution should be started just when the gas venting framework is developed and
working. Gas assortment should be intended to work with leachate assortment and distribution
frameworks. Bioreactor landfills should be planned and built to permit gas recuperation
incidental with the start of landfill activity.

References

[1] Gurijala, K.R. also, Suflita, J.M. (1993). "Natural variables impacting methanogenesis from
reject in landfill tests." Ecological Science and Innovation, 27(6), 1176-1181.

[2] Reinhart, D. R., and Townsend, T. G. (1997). Landfill bioreactor plan and activity. Lewis
Distributers, Boca Raton, FL, USA.

[3] Tolaymat, T. Kremer, F., Carson, D., Davis-Hoover, W. (2004). Checking Approaches for
Land-fill bioreactors. U.S. EPA, Cincinnati, Goodness, EPA/600/R-04/301

[4]USEPAsite http://www.epa.gov/OCEPAterms/aterms.html Surveyed Walk 1, 2008

[5] Baker, J. A., and C. Williams. February 2001. Settlement and Density Data for Leachate
Recirculation Landfills. Proceedings of Waste Tech Conference,

[6] Environmental Industry Association, San Diego, CA. Environmental Research and
Education Foundation (EREF). 2005. A Performance Base System for Post Closure Care at
Municipal Solid Waste Landfills, A procedure for providing long Term Stewardship under
RCRA Subtitle D. Environmental Research and Education Foundation. Alexandria, Virginia.

[7] Ham and Barlaz. 1987. Measurement and Prediction of Landfill Gas Quality and Quantity.
Proceedings Sardinia ’87. International Sanitary Landfill Symposium, ISWA, Cagliari, Italy,
paper VIII, 1 – 24.

[8] Hilger, H. H. and M. A. Barlaz. 2000. Anaerobic Decomposition of Refuse in Landfills and
Methane Oxidation in Landfill Cover Soils. Manual of Environmental Microbiology. 2nd Ed.,
Am. Soc. Microbiol., Washington, D. C.

[9] ITRC ALT-4. 2006. Technical and Regulatory Guidance for Ending Post Closure Care at
Landfills. Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council, (In progress scheduled for completion
June 2006).
[10] Reinhart, D. R., et al. 2005. Design and Operational Issues Related to the Co-Disposal of
Sludges and Biosolids in Class I Landfills- Phase II. Florida Center for Solid and Hazardous
Waste Management, Report # 0332