Hindus seem to have lost their ability to do a strategic analysis of the global scenario and

position themselves accordingly. Or rather, the Hindu masses are selecting such ‘leaders’ who
certainly do not have any ability to do some critical thinking. It has become a vicious cycle – the
masses select dumb, self serving ‘leaders’ who in turn ensure to keep the masses in their
pockets by using various ‘schemes’ which are not about strengthening the nation but retaining
the vote banks.

Such a democracy is keeping us weak and a large pumpkin ready to be divided by our
neighbors. Independence in 1947 was the best opportunity for us to regain our pre-eminent
position in the world. When the Mauryan empire was established, it was the largest empire of its
times – both in terms of population and economy. It was spread over a landmass much larger
than current day India. The aim of any defeated community must be to regain their past glory or
better yet, even surpass it. Rather, our leaders from the time of Nehru have been involved in
keeping us downtrodden, with no visions/dreams of grandeur.

The current geo-political scenario seems to be a treacherous sea which India is trying to sail
across without a proper ship, compass or sailors. We wonder if the only reason the country is
still holding together is due to some divine solace (despite our conviction that Gods should not
be expected to intervene on our behalf).

The Hindu land is surrounded by adversaries. Islamic threat in the west and east – exacerbated
by the presence of a sympathetic minority within the country, especially near the borders. Hans
are in the north – supported by the Communists and Maoists within India. The Theravadins in
Lanka have anti-Hindu strain – as established by their anti-vaidika activities during the invasions
of Tamil land. There is a Han-Islam-Theravadin circle around the Hindu land. Our leaders have
lost hold over Lanka which has now moved closer to the Hans. Our defense industries have
failed to attain self-sufficiency in conventional weapons. Be it a battle tank or a fighter aircraft,
we are still dependant on foreign supply – which is both costly as well as dangerous. To rely on
foreign supplies during wartime is a nightmare. Any war will be fought in localized manner – use
of excessive fire power with conventional weapons at the border and in strategic military
locations to destroy the enemy forces. The presence of nuclear weapons and international
pressure will provide deterrence against a complete conquer. But the presence of men who are
sympathetic to the enemies could be leveraged to divide the nation using some local revolts by
these communities – in localities where they are in majority. West Bengal and north-east will be
easily lost as we have a huge population of Muslims and Communists in those regions. When
Bangla Muslims revolt, our connection with Sikkim, Darjeeling and North-East will be severed.
West Bengal and North East can be divided among themselves by China and Bangladesh.

In the north, Ladakh and other Himalayan regions will be conquered by China. When the
Muslims in Kashmir and Western UP revolt, it will make Pakistan’s thrust in the West easier. As
catering to the minorities has become the norm in UP, the administration will not be in a position
to quell any such traitorous revolt. Such a triangular war will be the death knell for Indian Union.

While the situation indeed appears dire, there are ways to overcome this tumultuous period.
While China has allied with our enemies and is creating a ring of fire around us, the Hans have
enemies on her borders. The Han view is expressed by the article which makes plans for six
wars in the next few decades – in order to consolidate all the territories claimed by the Hans as
theirs. Thus, Hans have enemy states on their borders. The Indian answer must be to create a
counter ring of fire around China.

South Korea seems to be moving close towards her historical suzerain, China. We cannot
expect any help from the Koreans. Japanese are waking up to the Chinese threat and are
appearing to be re-arming themselves. Japan, Vietnam and Philippines are our natural allies
against China. Taiwan, though anti-Communist, cannot be trusted as the Hans in Taiwan also
have imperialistic notions of a greater China. China has trouble in its western borders as well.
While the Chinese are suffering from Uighur unrest in Xinjiang, they have territorial claim in
Central Asia, eastern Siberia, Mongolia, a few Japanese islands apart from India. Japan and
Russia do not enjoy good relations. But India is in a unique position to be the go-between state
for these two powers. India has no enemies in the Far East except China. We could leverage
this position to forge an alliance with a majority of states in the ASEAN and Far East. The
Mekong basin countries are afraid of Chinese attempts to divert waters from Mekong leading to
drought and famine in Indo-China. They have a common cause against Chinese impunity which
is a result of renewed Han imperialism. Mongolia fears Han expansion – a valid fear given that
inner Mongolia has been swamped by Hans and has been made into a province of Han China.

India could play the role of a mediator/middle man. Cambodia and Thailand have border
disputes. But both the countries have good relations with India. The fear of a rising China which
has imperialist notions based on its historical view of ‘Middle Kingdom’ is spreading among the
neighbors of China. An anti-China alliance is the need of the day. We cannot rely on the USA
much. US is on a retreat mood now. They seem to be planning to withdraw from Far East.
Americans cannot be expected to contain China singlehandedly anymore. With nearly 2.5
million strong military and another 2.5 million in reserves, China can field a force so large that
Americans might back out due to sheer fear about casualties. Any anti-China alliance must be
formed by the Asian neighbors of China.

But such an alliance is not enough. DRDO must be strengthened in India. The string of failures
must be corrected. LCA, Arjun Tank, Trishul etc point to a systemic failure. The corrupt
leadership seems to see gains in importing military assets. Thus, strengthening of our R&D
efforts at DRDO has not been given due importance. Any country needs strong domestic
military industry complex in order to fight wars. We cannot survive wars based on ammunition
imported from Israel or Russia.

The Orthodox Russia has a negative relationship with West. Russia and China come together
while facing the West. But Russians understand the Chinese threat in Eastern Siberia. Thus,
they have begun to conduct war games in Siberia. The West has traditionally sided with even
Muslims against the Orthodox (e.g. Crimean war). Even in Kosovo, we saw the NATO siding
with Muslims against the Orthodox Serbs. In the case of China, the West fears China but they
may still not be motivated to join any alliance against China – their traditional hatred for Russia
holding them back.

We must start engaging the ASEAN Buddhist nations more vigorously and conduct joint military
exercises with them. Malaysia and Indonesia may also join hands with us – but their distance
from China (in the case of Indonesia) and a large Chinese minority (in the case of Malaysia)
may keep them aloof. We must also try to get a greater foothold in Africa and Central Asia.
While we may not be able to counter China’s economy singlehandedly, we can form joint
ventures with other countries to take over the African assets that Chinese are interested in. To
hold a strong grip over Chinese energy supply must be a primary aim of Hans’ adversaries.

The primary circle against China shall be the border states of China apart from those of the
Mekong basin. The secondary line shall involve Malaysia, Indonesia and Australia. The third line
shall include the NATO and its allies.

An excessive crackdown on Uighurs can also be used to bring Islamic nations against Chinese.
While Islam is our other major enemy (for the West and Russia as well), we can still work
together to defang the Chinese giant.

Huntington rightly noted that India/Hindu civilization plays the role of a mere swing state in the
current circumstance. Destruction / even a strong containment of Han imperialism will open the
doors for a more prominent India much more easily as well. Containment of Hans must be a
primary motive of the Hindus apart from defending against Islamic aggression. But will the
Hindus ever wake up to this reality?