' wax wa / 8 . DA-3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI Al NEW DELHI (ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION) LA, No. 7251/2014 In €8(08) No, 1114/2008 | Harish Kumar Bhateja Plaintiffs) | Versus | Sh. Bhagwan Dass & Ors Defendant(s) ~ To Plaintiff: Harish Kumar Bhateja S/o Sh. Prabhu Dayal | Rlo 523, Sector ~ 15, Panchkula, Haryana, Defendant No. 11: - Sh. Baldev Raj S/o late Sh. Kesho Dass : 28/45, Punjabi Bagh (West), New Delhi, i _ Peterson No. 12: Se Rov s/o sh, Baldev Ral 4 28/45, Punjabi Bagh (West), New Delhi. Defendant No. 13: Sh. Prabhu Dayal S/o Late Sh. Kesho Dass { R/O H. No. 523, Sector ~ 15, Panchkula, Haryana, Defendant No. 14: Sh. Vinod Kumar S/o Sh. Prabhu Dayal Rio H. No. 523, Sector ~ 15, Panchkula, Haryana. pas WHEREAS the petition/application copy enclosed dated | presented in above nated case by the Applicant mentioned abave you are hereby | presenteh ehat the said petition is fixed for hearing on 19.08.2014 at 11.00 am. iniuah before Joint Registrar should you wish to urge anything agains! the CSitionapplicetion, you are at liberty to do so on the date fixed either in person Petthroughy an Advocate of this Court duly instructed. Also take notice thet Gofault of your appearance on the date fixed and in the manner mentioned above, the petition will be heard and decided ex-parte in your absence. Be Given under my hand and the Seal of this Court, this the 0B" day of May, 2014 oo \ suorreeiien § {ADMN.OFFICER JUDLO-) \y (OR REGISTRAR GENERAL | dk NOTE: / UY Under the provisions of Section 28 clause 3 (O)ERE _ Hindi/English spree ation ofthe report of the process serve" may also be sent to this court. i iu The Panty in pecson is Tequired to produce the following docurnents in order 4 to obtain the gate pass for entry to the Tigh Court: So oeaan ava upon the party or aay other proof requiring his presence in cae ine Hfigh Court. identity proof (aadhar card, election identity card, ration / arg, driving licence or passport)INTHE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. IN THE MATTER OF : SHRIHARISH BHATES® PLAINTIFF » VS SHRI BHAGWAN DASS & OTHERS: ~~-DEFENDANTS APPLICATION UNDER ORDER 18 RULE 4 READ WITH SECTION 151 CPC ON. BEHALF OF DEFENDANT NO.1 TO 10. : MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: 1 ‘That plaintiff has filed the above sult for partion, declaration and permanent injunction. The suit is pending before the Hon'ble Cour. ‘That plaintiff has alleged in the plaint that the suit plot was purchased by Shri Kesho Dass trom the funds of HUF. That defendants no. 11 to 14 In their writen statement have accepted and admitted the gase of the plaintif. In fact, the plainttf and defendants no. 11 to 14 are colluding with each other. The segregation of the parties as plattif and defendants no. 11 to 14 is only an eyewash in order to mislead the Hon'ble CourtIn view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the Hon'ble Court would be pleased to direct the defendants 11 to 14 to tender their evidence by way of affidavit before evidence of applicant defendants. eee NO. THROUGH Wh” (MIN IARMA ) ADVOCATE. 358, Law Chambers, Delhi High Court, New Delhi. New Delhi Dated: 1*t/o4/)4y 7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 1A. NO, OF 2014 Ul CS(OS)No_{1 4 OF Soap IN THE MATTER OF: SHRI HARISH BHAT ES 4 PLAINTIFF 'S & OTHERS ~--~-DEFENDANTS AFFIDAVIT Nepan Dass Bhateia s/o Late Kesho Dass aged 82 years tio He, iii Nagar, New Delhi-110015, ae hereby solemnly affirm and declare ag under: 1 swoarmant wih the facts of the case and ee ‘such is competent to Swear this affidavit, ving pplication may be read as part me are not repeated herein forthe DEPONENT VERIFICATION; ) 147 APR 2nt4 ne Narified at Delhi on thie! $Y of April, 2014 that the contents of 2 0° Sara TeGapNs of my atfidavit are true ane Correct to my knowledge,ino oo coy Bart org eB ae pe earns bgen concealed there from. ‘ ecg Ben Ro aap q fas scram v thet ie caniig” whee APR UR DEPONENT have noe rose 4 ae : U9 and correct te se