You are on page 1of 5

RESEARCH

Research and Professional Briefs

Dietary Intake and Severe Early Childhood Caries in


Low-Income, Young Children
E. Whitney Evans, MS, RD; Catherine Hayes, DMD, DrMedSc; Carole A. Palmer, EdD, RD; Odilia I. Bermudez, PhD; Steven A. Cohen, DrPH;
Aviva Must, PhD

ARTICLE INFORMATION ABSTRACT


Article history: Evidence suggests that risk for early childhood caries (ECCs), the most common chronic
Accepted 14 March 2013 infectious disease in childhood, is increased by specific eating behaviors. To identify
Available online 22 May 2013 whether consumption of added sugars, sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), and 100%
Keywords: fruit juice, as well as eating frequency, are associated with severe ECCs, cross-sectional
Diet data collected from a sample of low-income, racially diverse children aged 2 to 6 years
Sugar-sweetened beverages were used. Four hundred fifty-four children with severe ECCs and 429 caries-free chil-
Early childhood caries dren were recruited in 2004-2008 from three pediatric dental clinics in Columbus, OH;
Eating frequency
Cincinnati, OH; and Washington, DC. Dietary data were obtained from one parent-com-
pleted 24-hour recall and an interviewer-administered food frequency questionnaire
Copyright © 2013 by the Academy of Nutrition (FFQ). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess associations
and Dietetics.
2212-2672/$36.00 between severe ECCs and dietary variables. On average, children with severe ECCs con-
doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.03.014 sumed 3.2-4.8 fl oz more SSBs (24-hour recall⫽1.80 vs 1.17; P⬍ 0.001; FFQ⫽0.82 vs 0.39;
P⬍0.001) and reported significantly more daily eating occasions (5.26 vs 4.72;
P⬍0.0001) than caries-free children. After controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity, ma-
ternal education, recruitment site, and family size, children with the highest SSB intake
were 2.0 to 4.6 times more likely to have severe ECCs compared with those with the
lowest intake, depending on dietary assessment method (24-hour recall odds ratio 2.02,
95% CI 1.33 to 3.06; FFQ odds ratio 4.63, 95% CI 2.86 to 7.49). The relationship between
eating frequency and severe ECC status was no longer significant in multivariate analy-
ses. Specific dietary guidance for parents of young children, particularly regarding SSB
consumption, could help reduce severe ECC prevalence.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113:1057-1061.

E
ARLY CHILDHOOD CARIES (ECCS), DEFINED BY THE Both ECCs and severe ECCs are entirely preventable dis-
Academy of American Pediatric Dentists as the eases, which result from the interaction of susceptible, newly
presence of one or more decayed, missing (due to erupted dentition, bacterial plaque, and dietary compo-
caries), or filled tooth surfaces in any primary tooth nents.10 Considerable evidence suggests that dietary sugars
in a child younger than age 6 years, is the most common are needed to initiate caries development; however, this re-
chronic infectious disease in childhood.1,2 Approximately lationship is complicated by food-related factors, eating fre-
33% of children aged 2 to 5 years in the United States have quency, variations in oral microflora, and fluoride use.11-13
ECCs, and recent estimates show that prevalence has in- Evidence from the 2005-2008 National Health and Nutrition
creased, particularly in low socioeconomic status families Examination Survey (NHANES) suggests that children aged 2
where prevention and treatment services are often defi- to 5 years consume approximately 50 g of added sugar per
cient.3-6 Estimates suggest that 30% of children below the day.14 Given the large amount of added sugar in the diets of
poverty line have untreated decay compared with only 6% young children, as well as evidence that added sugars may be
of children at or greater than 300% of the poverty line.7 more cariogenic than natural sugars,15,16 both added sugar in
Untreated caries are associated with pain and can lead to foods and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) have been im-
problems with speech, sleeping, and eating in children.8 plicated in caries development.17-19
Severe ECC is defined as having one or more decayed (non- One hundred percent fruit juice has also been associated
cavitated or cavitated lesions), missing (due to caries), or with caries, but the relationship is less clear. Data from chil-
filled smooth surfaces (DMF) in the primary teeth for chil- dren aged 2 to 10 years who participated in NHANES III sug-
dren younger than 3 years of age, or having four, five, or six gest that children who consume ⱖ17 oz 100% juice are more
or more DMF in the primary teeth of children ages 3, 4, and likely to have caries than those who are high water or milk
5 years, respectively.2 Children with severe ECCs are more consumers.20 Conversely, in a cohort of low-income African-
likely to suffer from malnourishment, specifically low American children, 100% fruit juice was found to be protective
weight-for-height and iron deficiency anemia.9 of caries.18 Given that 100% fruit juice contains about the

© 2013 by the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF NUTRITION AND DIETETICS 1057
RESEARCH

same amount of sugar as the average SSB,17 it is important to naire, which included questions on their child’s race/ethnic-
understand its role in caries. Finally, eating frequency, partic- ity, age, family income, family size, maternal education, and
ularly constant grazing or sipping of foods and beverages, is insurance type.
also caries promoting.11,12,21 In a recent study in a diverse
sample of children aged 2 to 6 years, eating frequency was
associated with severe ECCs.21 Dietary Assessment
Although many studies have examined how dietary intake Dietary intake was assessed using two standard dietary as-
behaviors affect caries risk in older preschool-aged children sessment methods: one 24-hour diet recall and the Block
(aged 3.5 years and older), studies in young children from 2004 Kids’ Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ).24 Trained
low-income, racially diverse families are few.13 The Effect of and certified interviewers collected a 24-hour diet recall from
Severe Early Childhood Caries and Comprehensive Dental In- each participant’s primary caregiver using the multiple-pass
tervention on Weight of Children Study, was a multicenter method of the University of Minnesota Nutrition Data System
cohort study designed to examine the effects of severe ECCs for Research (NDSR) (versions 2005-2007, University of Min-
on weight in low-income children aged 2 to 6 years.22 The nesota Nutrition Coordinating Center). To determine the con-
availability of standardized dental examinations and dietary sumption of added sugars from all foods and beverages, added
assessments in this large sample of young children with and sugars reported in the Food File were summed (NDSR output
without severe ECCs provided the opportunity for this cross- file 2). To determine consumption of SSBs, in 8 fl oz servings
sectional, secondary data analysis. The aim of this study was per day, subgroup category serving counts of sweetened soft
to examine the association between specific dietary intake drinks, sweetened fruit drinks, sweetened tea and coffee,
behaviors, namely consumption of added sugars, SSBs, and sweetened coffee substitutes, sweetened water, and non-
100% fruit juice, as well as eating frequency, and the presence dairy-based sweetened meal replacements were summed us-
of severe ECCs in a diverse sample of low-income, young chil- ing the Serving Count Food File (NDSR output file 7). Con-
dren. It was hypothesized that intake of added sugar, SSBs, sumption of 100% fruit juice, in 4-fl oz servings, was
and fruit juice would be positively associated with severe determined by summing subgroup category serving counts of
ECCs, and that children with severe ECCs would have a higher citrus juice and fruit juice excluding citrus. Finally, eating fre-
eating frequency compared with caries-free children. quency, a count of all self-reported eating occasions, was de-
termined from the Serving Count Meal File (NDSR output
METHODS file 8).
The 81-item Block Kids’ FFQ, which was also administered
Selection of Participants to the child’s primary caregiver, captures usual intake during
From 2004 to 2008, children with and without severe ECCs the prior 6 months.24 The FFQ data were analyzed to generate
were recruited from pediatric dental clinics at Children’s Na- average daily intakes for added sugars from all foods and bev-
tional Medical Center (Washington, DC), Columbus Children’s erages, SSBs, and 100% fruit juice. Standard portion sizes pro-
Hospital (Columbus, OH), and Cincinnati Children’s Hospital vided in the Block output differed from those in the NDSR
(Cincinnati, OH). This study was undertaken before the use of output, so conversions were made to allow for comparison
a widely accepted definition of ECC. Therefore, investigators across dietary assessment methodologies. Specifically, Block
established criteria for severe ECCs as the presence of three or
provides average consumption of grams of sugary beverages,
more smooth surface carious lesions, including at least one
cup equivalents (8 fl oz) of 100% fruit juice, and grams of
pulpally involved tooth, in which the carious lesion has
added sugar. To convert grams of sugary beverages to 8-fl oz
spread into the pulp or nerve center of the tooth. A total of 454
servings, 2004-2005 NHANES data was used to identify the
children, aged 2 to 6 years old, who met the definition of
most commonly consumed SSBs and an average gram weight
severe ECC and had full primary dentition, no previous inva-
was created from those beverages (249 g per 8-fl oz serving).
sive dental procedures, and noncontributory medical history
(disease diagnosis with known oral impact) were enrolled in
the study. As a comparison group, 429 children without caries Statistical Analysis
or white-spot lesions (a precursor of caries) were also en- All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.2
rolled. Given that this was a secondary data analysis and data (2008, SAS Institute, Inc), with statistical significance set at an
were fully deidentified, this study was deemed exempt by the ␣ level of P⬍0.05. To determine whether specific dietary in-
Tufts University Health Sciences Campus Institutional Review take behaviors differed between those with and without se-
Board.23 vere ECCs, 2-sample t tests as well as multivariate logistic
regression analyses were conducted. In addition to the inclu-
Oral Health Assessment sion of recruitment site, for all multivariate analyses, we as-
Before enrollment, all potential participants received a com- sessed the need to control for potential confounding variables
prehensive oral evaluation conducted by a licensed dentist as including age, sex, race/ethnicity, maternal education, family
part of routine care. Clinical data obtained from this standard size, and insurance type. Given that the literature suggests
exam allowed for identification of children for the severe ECCs that the number of caries is due to the frequency of sugar
and caries-free groups. The dentists were not calibrated consumption,21,25 using data from the 24-hour dietary recalls
across study sites; however, caries were diagnosed using we present additional multivariate models that control for
standard criteria, equipment (light, air, explorer), and radio- the total number of eating occasions. We also evaluated how
graphs. After enrollment into the study, primary caregivers of eating frequency differed in the two groups, controlling for
participants completed a brief sociodemographic question- sociodemographic factors as appropriate.

1058 JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF NUTRITION AND DIETETICS August 2013 Volume 113 Number 8
RESEARCH

Table 1. Dietary intake in children with severe early childhood caries (S-ECC) and caries-free children

Dietary assessment method Dietary intake S-ECC (nⴝ381) Caries-free (nⴝ427) P valuea

4™™™™™ mean⫾standard deviation ™™™™™3


24-h recall 100% Fruit juiceb 0.94⫾0.79 1.07⫾0.95 0.08
c b
FFQ 100% Fruit juice 1.59⫾1.42 1.67⫾1.38 0.45
24-h recall Sugar-sweetened beveragesd 1.80⫾2.21 1.17⫾1.66 ⬍0.0001
FFQb Sugar-sweetened beveragesd 0.82⫾0.87 0.39⫾0.49 ⬍0.0001
24-h recall Added sugar (g/d) 66.07⫾45.48 58.44⫾50.07 0.04
FFQ b
Added sugar (g/d) 61.08⫾34.28 43.56⫾23.52 ⬍0.0001
24-h recall Eating frequency 5.26⫾1.64 4.72⫾1.59 ⬍0.0001
a
Based on two-sided t test.
b
Refers to a 4-fl oz serving.
c
FFQ⫽Block 2004 Kid’s Food Frequency Questionnaire.
d
Refers to an 8-fl oz serving.

Table 2. Dietary intake logistic regression analysis for young children with severe early childhood caries (S-ECC) vs caries-
free childrena

Dietary assessment method Dietary intake Odds ratiob 95% CI Odds ratioc 95% CI

24-h recall 100% Fruit juice 0.92 0.81-1.04 0.92 0.81-1.04


d
FFQ 100% Fruit juice 0.96 0.85-1.09
24-h recall Sugar-sweetened beverages 1.14 1.03-1.25 1.14 1.03-1.25
FFQd Sugar-sweetened beverages 2.39 1.71-3.34
24-h recall Added sugar (g) 1.00 0.99-1.00 1.00 0.99-1.00
FFQd Added sugar (g) 1.02 1.01-1.03
24-h recall Eating occasions 1.01 0.89-1.14
a
Separate models were used for each dietary intake exposure.
b
Controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity, maternal education, recruitment site, and family size.
c
Controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity, maternal education, recruitment site, family size, and eating frequency.
d
FFQ⫽Block 2004 Kid’s Food Frequency Questionnaire.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION to 4.8 fl oz SSB/day, depending on dietary assessment method,


A total of 808 children completed an FFQ and 24-hour recall at compared with caries-free children (P⬍0.0001). Children
the enrollment visit (381 children with severe ECCs and 427 with severe ECCs also consumed significantly more added
caries-free children). Children with severe ECCs were statisti- sugars from food and beverages compared with caries-free
cally significantly more likely to be older (4.32 years vs 3.77 children (24-hour recall 66.07 g vs 58.44 g; P⫽0.04; FFQ 61.08
years; P⬍0.0001), boys (54% vs 44.5%; P⬍0.0001), non-His- g vs 43.56 g; P⬍0.0001). There were no significant differences
panic white (59.7% vs 21.8%; P⬍0.0001), and have larger fam- in consumption of 100% fruit juice using either dietary assess-
ily size (4.5 people vs 4.0 people; P⬍0.0001). Caries-free chil- ment method.
dren were statistically significantly more likely to have a Separate logistic regression models were run for each di-
mother who graduated from college (14.5% vs 6.0%; etary intake behavior and dietary assessment method (Table
P⬍0.0001). Eighty-percent of all participants received Medic- 2). Overall, the results show that, after controlling for age, sex,
aid insurance. The racial distribution in this study is related to race/ethnicity, maternal education, recruitment site, and
the fact that the Columbus site, which serves children who are family size, each additional serving of SSB was associated with
predominantly low income, non-Hispanic white, contributed a 14% and 139% increased odds of having severe ECCs based on
numerous severe ECCs cases, whereas the Washington, DC, the 24-hour recall and FFQ, respectively. Similarly, when chil-
site contributed considerably more non-Hispanic black, car- dren were grouped by tertile of SSB intake, children in the
ies-free children. third tertile were 2.0 to 4.6 times more likely to have severe
Table 1 displays the dietary intake patterns for SSBs, added ECCs compared with those in the first tertile for the 24-hour
sugars, and 100% fruit juice between children with and with- recall and FFQ, respectively (Table 3). Intake of 100% fruit juice
out severe ECCs for each dietary assessment method. On av- did not differ between those with and without severe ECCs
erage, children with severe ECCs consumed an additional 3.2 based on either dietary assessment method.

August 2013 Volume 113 Number 8 JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF NUTRITION AND DIETETICS 1059
RESEARCH

Table 3. Odds of having severe early childhood caries by tertile of sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake in low-income,
preschool–aged children

P value
Dietary assessment method Tertile n SSB intakea Tertile comparison Odds ratiob (95% CI) for trend

2004 Block Kid’s Food 1 246 0 to ⬍0.16 Reference — ⬍0.0001


Frequency Questionnaire 2 269 ⱕ0.16 to ⬍0.63 2 vs 1 2.65 (1.68-4.19)
3 254 ⱕ0.63 to ⬍7 3 vs 1 4.63 (2.86-7.49)
24-h recall 1 301 0 Reference — 0.37
2 240 0 to ⬍1.7 2 vs 1 1.21 (0.79-1.85)
3 263 ⱕ1.7 to ⬍14 3 vs 1 2.02 (1.33-3.06)
a
Number of 8-fl oz servings/d.
b
Separate logistic regression models for each dietary assessment method controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity, maternal education, recruitment site, and family size.

These findings are consistent with those from studies in 3-day diet records, which provide a better estimate of usual
other pediatric populations that have shown that SSBs, car- dietary intake patterns than a single 24-hour recall.
bonated soft drinks in particular, are associated with caries The primary strengths of this study are the large sample of
and caries development,19,21 whereas consumption of 100% young children from low-income, racially diverse families
fruit juice either has little effect on caries experience or may and the use of two different dietary assessment methods, the
be protective.17,18 Our finding that children who consume 5 24-hour recall and FFQ. Use of a single 24-hour recall is a
oz SSB/day are up to 4.6 times more likely to have severe ECCs limitation of this analysis. For the other dietary intake behav-
compared with those who consume ⱕ1 oz/per day highlights iors, using data from the Block FFQ, which addresses usual
the need for early dietary intervention in young children from intake during the past 6 months, helped to address this limi-
low-income families. Although SSBs and 100% fruit juice may tation. Another limitation of this study is that in obtaining
have similar absolute amounts of sugar, SSBs likely have dietary assessments from parents, they can be accurate only
greater cariogenic potential because they are very acidic, to the extent that parents are with their children throughout
which can lead to demineralization of tooth enamel and caries the day. It is possible that the observed differences in mean
formation.26 intakes between the 24-hour recall and FFQ may be subject to
Whereas the relationship between caries status and grams some social desirability bias in that parents report a healthier
of added sugars was statistically significant using data from diet over the long term, but may not do so for a single day’s
the FFQ, it was not significant using the 24-hour recall data. recall.28 Further, the data used in this study are 5 to 9 years
The FFQ results suggest that for every 1-g increase in added old; however, the increased prevalence of SSBs in children’s
sugar intake, odds of having severe ECCs increases by 2%. This diets would not change the nature of the association. Instead,
finding is consistent with a previous observational study in it emphasizes the public health implications of these findings.
young Brazilian children, which showed that odds for ECC In addition, given that this was a secondary data analysis, no
were greater in those with higher total sugar exposure.27 The information on the presence of specific bacterial plaque was
fact that the findings between the 24-hour recall and FFQ available, which has been shown to play a significant role in
were inconsistent may be due to the fact that using only one caries development.21 Finally, the cross-sectional nature of
24-hour recall to estimate added sugar intake may not reflect this study does not exclude the possibility of reverse causa-
usual or long-term intake, whereas the FFQ estimates long- tion. It is possible that the presence of severe ECCs may have
term, relative intake. altered patterns of dietary intake.
Finally, although it was hypothesized that eating frequency
would be associated with severe ECCs in this cohort, only the CONCLUSIONS
univariate analysis showed that children with severe ECCs Given the strong and often publicized relationship between
had a statistically significant additional 0.5 eating occasions SSB consumption and childhood obesity risk, SSB intake in
per day (5.26 occasions vs 4.72 occasions; P⬍0.0001). Unlike young children is a public health concern. This analysis shows
previous research, after controlling for age, sex, race/ethnic- that SSBs and added sugars from both foods and beverages
ity, maternal education, recruitment site, and family size, the play a significant role in severe ECCs in young children from
multivariable analysis suggested no meaningful statistical or low-income, racially diverse families. Given the substantial
clinical relationship between eating frequency and severe and immediate consequences of untreated caries, specific di-
ECC (odds ratio 1.01, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.14).21,25 Findings from etary guidance on consumption of added sugars and SSBs in
the Iowa Fluoride Study, a study of 634 primarily non-His- the context of their role in both caries and childhood obesity
panic white children, suggest that those with higher daily to- risk may be effective. Specifically, given these findings, coun-
tal eating events had increased caries risk (P⬍0.05).25 This seling low-income parents with young children on consump-
discrepancy may be due to differences in sample demograph- tion of added sugars from foods and SSBs is needed to reduce
ics or to dietary assessment methods used in this study. The the prevalence of severe ECCs, an entirely preventable dis-
Iowa study was longitudinal and relied on multiple years of ease. Future prospective studies are needed in low-income,

1060 JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF NUTRITION AND DIETETICS August 2013 Volume 113 Number 8
RESEARCH

very young children to better understand how these dietary 14. Ervin R, Kit B, Carroll M, Ogden C. Consumption of Added Sugar Among
U.S. Children and Adolescents, 2005–2008. Hyattsville, MD: National
intake behaviors contribute to caries development while con- Center for Health Statistics; 2012.
trolling for oral microflora. 15. Gibson S. Non-milk extrinsic sugars in the diets of pre-school chil-
dren: Association with intakes of micronutrients, energy, fat and NSP.
Br J Nutr. 1997;78(3):367-378.
References 16. Edgar W. Extrinsic and intrinsic sugars: A review of recent UK
1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2020. recommendations on diet and caries. Caries Res. 1993;27(suppl):
Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2010. 64-67.
2. Policy on early childhood caries (ECC): Classifications, consequences, 17. Marshall T, Levy S, Broffitt B, et al. Dental caries and beverage
and preventive strategies, 2011. American Academy of Pediatric consumption in young children. Pediatrics. 2003;112(3):e184-
Dentists website. http://www.aapd.org/media/Policies_Guidelines/ e191.
P_ECCClassifications.pdf. Accessed November 27, 2012. 18. Kolker J, Yuan Y, Burt B, et al. Dental caries and dietary patterns in
3. Dye B, Tan S, Smith V. Trends in oral health status: United States, low-income African American children. Pediatr Dent. 2007;29(6):
457-464.
1988-1994 and 1999-2004. Vital and Health Statistics, Series 11, No
248. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2007. 19. Lim S, Sohn W, Burt B, et al. Cariogenicity of soft drinks, milk and fruit
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_11/sr11_248.pdf. Accessed juice in low-income African-American children. J Am Dent Assoc.
June 29, 2011. 2008;139(7):959-967.
4. Mouradian WE, Wehr E, Crall JJ. Disparaties in children’s oral health 20. Sohn W, Burt B, Sowers M. Carbonated soft drinks and dental caries in
and access to dental care. JAMA. 2000;284(20):2625-2631. the primary dentition. J Dent Res. 2006;85(3):262-266.

5. Nunn M, Dietrich T, Singh H, Henshaw M, Kressin N. Prevalence of early 21. Palmer C, Kent R, Loo C, et al. Diet and caries-associated bacte-
ria in severe early childhood caries. J Dent Res. 2010;89(11):1224-
childhood caries among very young urban Boston children compared
1229.
with US children. J Public Health Dent. 2009;69(3):156-162.
22. Cunnion D, Spiro A, Jones J, et al. Pediatric oral health-related quality
6. Tinanoff N, Reisine S. Update on early childhood caries since the Sur-
of life improvement after treatment of early childhood caries: A pro-
geon General’s Report. Acad Pediatr. 2009;9(6):396-403. spective multisite study. J Dent Children. 2010;77(1):4-11.
7. Vargas C, Crall J, Schneider D. Sociodemographic distribution of pedi- 23. Basic HHS policy for protection of human research subjects. US De-
atric dental caries: NHANES 1988-1994. J Am Dent Assoc. 1998; partment of Health and Human Services website. http://www.
129(9):55-66. hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.html. Accessed No-
8. Casamassimo PS, Thikkurissy S, Edelstein BL, Maiorini E. Beyond the vember 27, 2012.
DMFT: The human and economic cost of early childhood caries. J Am 24. Food frequency questionnaires and screeners for children and
Dent Assoc. 2009;140(6):650-657. adolescents. NutritionQuest website. http://www.nutritionquest.
9. Clarke M, Locker D, Berall G, Pencharz P, Kenny D, Judd P. Malnour- com/assessment/list-of-questionnaires-and-screeners/. Accessed
ishment in a population of young children with severe early child- November 27, 2012.
hood caries. Pediatr Dent. 2006;28(3):254-259. 25. Marshall T, Broffitt B, Eichenberger-Gilmore J, Warren J, Cunningham
M, Levy S. The roles of meal, snack, and daily total food and beverage
10. Palmer C, ed. Diet and Nutrition in Oral Health. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle
exposures on caries experience in young children. J Public Health Dent.
River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2007.
2005;65(3):166-173.
11. Gustafsson B, Quensel C, Lanke L, et al. The Vipeholm dental caries 26. Tahmassebi J, Duggal M, Malik-Kotru G, Curzon M. Soft drinks and dental
study: The effect of different levels of carbohydrate intake on caries health: A review of the current literature. J Dent. 2006;34(1):2-11.
activity in 436 individuals observed for five years. Acta Odontol Scand.
1954;11(3-4):232-264. 27. Parisotto TM, Steiner-Oliveira C, Duque C, Peres RCR, Rodrigues LKA,
Nobre-dos-Santos M. Relationship among microbiological composi-
12. Burt B, Eklund S, Morgan K, et al. The effects of sugars intake and tion and presence of dental plaque, sugar exposure, social factors and
frequency of ingestion on dental caries increment in a three-year different stages of early childhood caries. Arch Oral Biol. 2010;55(5):
longitudinal study. J Dent Res. 1988;67(11):1422-1429. 365-373.
13. Warren J, Weber-Gasparoni K, Marshall T, et al. A longitudinal study 28. Hebert J, Clemow L, Pbert L, Ockene I, Ockene J. Social desirability bias
of dental caries risk among very young low SES children. Community in dietary self-report may compromise the validity of dietary intake
Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2009;37(2):116-122. measures. Int J Epidemiol. 1995;24(2):389-398.

AUTHOR INFORMATION
E. W. Evans is a PhD student, Tufts University Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Boston, MA. C. Hayes is director of special
projects, Health Resources in Action, Boston, MA. C. A. Palmer is professor and head of the Division of Nutrition and Oral Health Promotion,
Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, and professor, Tufts University Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Boston,
MA. O. I. Bermudez is a professor, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA. S. A. Cohen is a professor, Virginia Commonwealth University
School of Medicine, Richmond. A. Must is dean, Public Health & Professional Degree Programs, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA,
and a professor, Tufts University Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Boston, MA.
Address correspondence to: E. Whitney Evans, MS, RD, Tufts University Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, 136 Harrison Ave,
Boston, MA 02111. E-mail: whitney.evans@tufts.edu
STATEMENT OF POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
FUNDING/SUPPORT
This study was supported by National Institutes of Health grant no. R21DE018119. The study sponsors had no role in study design, data
collection, analysis, interpretation, writing of the report, or decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

August 2013 Volume 113 Number 8 JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF NUTRITION AND DIETETICS 1061

You might also like