You are on page 1of 3

INDUSTRIAL EXPOSURE TRAINING -2018

NAME: HARIPRASAD.N

ROLLNO: 16BBA214

TITLE: PROFILE OF THE COMPANY

APEX GLOBAL SOLUTIONS

 NAME OF THE COMPANY: APEX GLOBAL SOLUTIONS


 ADDRESS: M/s. APEX GLOBAL SOLUTIONS
No.13/6,Kumaran Colony, 3rd Street,
Vadapalani, Chennai-600026

 WEBSITE: www.apexglobalsolutions.in
 ORGANISATIONAL GUIDE: C.Raja
 CONTACT NO: 9444463251
 FORM OF THE COMPANY: IT Industry
 CERTIFICATIONS: This company belongs to ISO certification
 COMPANY BELONGS TO: CTS (Consulting, Training & Skilling)
 FUTURE TRENDS OF COMPANY:
1) Company targets on official projects to tackle in
the next year.
2) Company planning to conduct skill development
programs for employees.
 SERVICES OFFERED BY THE COMPANY:
1) NSDC - PMKVY
2) Govt Project – Retail ,IT & ITES Apparels & Textiles
3) ERTT
4) Chennai Corporation – Retail Sales Associate
 CUSTOMERS OF THE COMPANY:
1) Inncon - Chennai
2) Addicco - Chennai
3) Grace Soft Solutions – Chennai
4) Annai Security Services – Chennai
5) Sai Builders – Chennai

 VISION OF THE COMPANY: Empower students to overcome the


challenges and prepare them for 21st century work force
environment by providing training & skilling
 HISTORY OF THE COMPANY: Apex Global Solution is a CTS
(Consulting , Training & Skilling) company. The company
recognises the important of skill gap prevailing across job
seekers community and designed in form of the number of
courses to overcome the challenges in order to empower them
to address the requirement of 21th century work force
development.

 OWNERSHIP OF THE COMPANY: Partnership

1) Skill India
2) National skill Development Corporation
3) Telecom Sector Skill Council
4) Healthcare Sector Skill Council
 DEPATMENTATION OF THE COMPANY:
1) Aerospace
2) Tourism & Hospitality
3) Healthcare
4) Automobile
5) Constructions

ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE: The classic


organizational style of traditional businesses. The strength of
this type of organization is that it is easier to optimize each
function, as there are more resources available within each
function in a centralized approach. This can enable a more
sophisticated approach to best practices. On the downside, I
remember well the frustrations of my first job with a Big 3
Automotive manufacturer, which was VERY hierarchical and
centralized. The company was SO hierarchical that it paralyzed
the organization to a huge degree. Trying to get even the
simplest, small thing done had to go many levels up. It was like
trying to turn a battleship on a dime and was really painful. I’m
not a big fan of this org structure style for larger and complex
companies, but for smaller, single-market or single product
companies, it generally is optimal.

THANK YOU

You might also like