8/1/2021 Property (philosophy) - Wikipedia

Property (philosophy)
In logic and philosophy (especially metaphysics), a property is a characteristic of an object; a red object
is said to have the property of redness. The property may be considered a form of object in its own right,
able to possess other properties. A property, however, differs from individual objects in that it may be
instantiated, and often in more than one thing. It differs from the logical/mathematical concept of class
by not having any concept of extensionality, and from the philosophical concept of class in that a
property is considered to be distinct from the objects which possess it. Understanding how different
individual entities (or particulars) can in some sense have some of the same properties is the basis of the
problem of universals.

Contents
Metaphysical debates
Realism vs. anti-realism
Categoricalism vs. dispositionalism
Physicalism, idealism, and property dualism
Essential and accidental properties
Determinate and determinable properties
Lovely and suspect qualities
Properties and predicates
Intrinsic and extrinsic properties
Relations
See also
References
External links

Metaphysical debates
In modern analytic philosophy there are several debates about the fundamental nature of properties.
These center around questions such as: Are properties real? Are they categorical or dispositional? Are
properties physical or mental?

Realism vs. anti-realism

A realist about properties asserts that properties have genuine existence.[1] One way to spell this out is in
terms of exact, repeatable, instantiations known as universals. The other realist position asserts that
properties are particulars (tropes), which are unique instantiations in individual objects that merely
resemble one another to various degrees.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Property_(philosophy)#Categoricalism_vs._dispositionalism 1/5
8/1/2021 Property (philosophy) - Wikipedia

The anti-realist position, often referred to as nominalism claims that properties are names we attach to
particulars. The properties themselves have no existence.

Categoricalism vs. dispositionalism

According to the categoricalist, dispositions reduce to causal bases.[2] The fragility of a wine glass, for
example, is not a property that exists in the glass. Rather it can be explained by the categorical property
of the glass's micro-structural composition.

Dispositionalism, in turn, asserts that a property is nothing more than a set of causal powers.[3] Fragility,
according to this view, identifies a real property of the glass (e.g. to shatter when dropped on a
sufficiently hard surface).

Several intermediary positions exist.[4] The Identity view that states that properties are both
categorical(qualitative) and dispositional, they are just two ways of viewing the same property. One
hybrid view claims that some properties are categorical and some are dispositional. A second hybrid view
claims that properties have both a categorical(qualitative) and dispositional part, but that these are
distinct ontological parts.

Physicalism, idealism, and property dualism

Property dualism describes a category of positions in the philosophy

of mind which hold that, although the world is constituted of just
one kind of substance—the physical kind—there exist two distinct
kinds of properties: physical properties and mental properties. In
other words, it is the view that non-physical, mental properties (such
as beliefs, desires and emotions) inhere in some physical substances
(namely brains).

This stands in contrast to physicalism and idealism. Physicalism

claims that all properties, include mental properties, ultimately
reduce to, or supervene on, physical properties.[5] Metaphysical Property dualism: the
idealism, by contrast, claims that "something mental (the mind, exemplification of two kinds of
spirit, reason, will) is the ultimate foundation of all reality, or even property by one kind of substance
exhaustive of reality."[6]

Essential and accidental properties

In classical Aristotelian terminology, a property (Greek: idion, Latin: proprium) is one of the
predicables. It is a non-essential quality of a species (like an accident), but a quality which is nevertheless
characteristically present in members of that species. For example, "ability to laugh" may be considered
a special characteristic of human beings. However, "laughter" is not an essential quality of the species
human, whose Aristotelian definition of "rational animal" does not require laughter. Therefore, in the
classical framework, properties are characteristic qualities that are not truly required for the continued
existence of an entity but are, nevertheless, possessed by the entity.

Determinate and determinable properties

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Property_(philosophy)#Categoricalism_vs._dispositionalism 2/5
8/1/2021 Property (philosophy) - Wikipedia

A property may be classified as either determinate or determinable. A determinable property is one that
can get more specific. For example, color is a determinable property because it can be restricted to
redness, blueness, etc.[7] A determinant property is one that cannot become more specific. This
distinction may be useful in dealing with issues of identity.[8]

Lovely and suspect qualities

Daniel Dennett distinguishes between lovely properties (such as loveliness itself), which, although they
require an observer to be recognised, exist latently in perceivable objects; and suspect properties which
have no existence at all until attributed by an observer (such as being suspected of a crime).[9]

Properties and predicates

The ontological fact that something has a property is typically represented in language by applying a
predicate to a subject. However, taking any grammatical predicate whatsoever to be a property, or to
have a corresponding property, leads to certain difficulties, such as Russell's paradox and the Grelling–
Nelson paradox. Moreover, a real property can imply a host of true predicates: for instance, if X has the
property of weighing more than 2 kilos, then the predicates "..weighs more than 1.9 kilos", "..weighs
more than 1.8 kilos", etc., are all true of it. Other predicates, such as "is an individual", or "has some
properties" are uninformative or vacuous. There is some resistance to regarding such so-called
"Cambridge properties" as legitimate.[10]

Intrinsic and extrinsic properties

An intrinsic property is a property that an object or a thing has of itself, independently of other things,
including its context. An extrinsic (or relational) property is a property that depends on a thing's
relationship with other things. The latter is sometimes also called an attribute, since the value of that
property is given to the object via its relation with another object. For example, mass is a physical
intrinsic property of any physical object, whereas weight is an extrinsic property that varies depending
on the strength of the gravitational field in which the respective object is placed. other examples are the
name of a person (an attribute given by the person's parents) and the weight or mass of the person.

Relations
The distinction between properties and relations can hardly be given in terms that do not ultimately
presuppose it.[11]

Relations are true of several particulars, or shared amongst them. Thus the relation "... is taller than ..."
holds "between" two individuals, who would occupy the two ellipses ('...'). Relations can be expressed by
N-place predicates, where N is greater than 1.

There are at least some apparent relational properties which are merely derived from non-relational (or
1-place) properties. For instance "A is heavier than B" is a relational predicate, but it is derived from the
two non relational properties: the mass of A and the mass of B. Such relations are called external
relations, as opposed to the more genuine internal relations.[12] Some philosophers believe that all
relations are external, leading to a scepticism about relations in general, on the basis that external
relations have no fundamental existence.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Property_(philosophy)#Categoricalism_vs._dispositionalism 3/5
8/1/2021 Property (philosophy) - Wikipedia

See also
Abstraction
Doctrine of internal relations
Identity of indiscernibles (or "Leibniz's law")
Intension

References
1. "Properties" (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/properties/#DisTer). The Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. 2017.
2. "Properties" (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/properties/#CatProVsCauPow). The Stanford
Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. 2017.
3. "Dispositions" (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dispositions/#CatDisLawNat). The Stanford
Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. 2018.
4. "Dispositions" (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dispositions/#CatDisLawNat). The Stanford
Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. 2018.
5. "Physicalism" (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/physicalism/). The Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. 2017.
6. "Idealism" (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/idealism/#Int). The Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. 2018.
7. Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy Determinate and Determinable Properties (http://plato.stanfor
d.edu/entries/determinate-determinables/)
8. Georges Dicker (1998). Hume's Epistemology & Metaphysics. Routledge. p. 31.
9. "Lovely and Suspect Qualities" (http://ase.tufts.edu/cogstud/dennett/papers/lovely&s.htm). Retrieved
3 August 2016.
10. Nelson, Michael (1 January 2012). Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
(http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/existence/). Retrieved 3 August 2016 – via
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
11. MacBride, Fraser. "Relations" (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/relations/). In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.).
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
12. G. E. Moore (December 15, 1919), "External and Internal Relations" (http://hume.ucdavis.edu/matte
y/phi156/moore.pdf)

External links
Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). "Properties" (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/properties/). Stanford
Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
MacBride, Fraser. "Relations" (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/relations/). In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.).
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Property_(philosophy)&oldid=990570070"

This page was last edited on 25 November 2020, at 07:07 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site,
you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a
non-profit organization.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Property_(philosophy)#Categoricalism_vs._dispositionalism 4/5
8/1/2021 Property (philosophy) - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Property_(philosophy)#Categoricalism_vs._dispositionalism 5/5