The Frankfurt school, part 2: Negative dialectics | Peter Thompson | Comment is free | theguardian.

com 06/02/2014 12:47

Try our new site

Search

The Frankfurt school, part 2: Negative

dialectics
Unlike Hegel, Theodor Adorno rejected the idea the outcome of
the dialectic will always be positive, and preordained

Peter Thompson
theguardian.com, Monday 1 April 2013 09.00 BST

'Adorno criticised Hegel, above, for presenting a positive and affirmative dialectic in which 'everything that is real is
rational'.'

Already in the comments about the first instalment of this series, a problem of traditions
has emerged. For a predominantly Anglo-Saxon audience, raised in the empirical and
positivist tradition, understanding a group of thinkers schooled in speculative
Hegelianism and Marxist dialectics is always going to require a leap of faith. This is also
compounded by the fact that the largely monoglot Anglo-Saxon tradition has to work
with translations of these thinkers, which are not always the best that can be achieved.

For example, terms such as Wissenschaft and Geist traditionally get translated into
"science" and "spirit", apparently irreconcilable opposites, whereas in philosophical
terms the difference between the two is much less marked. In fact, you might argue that
in the original German they could both be translated as "knowledge", albeit different
types of knowledge bounded by speculation. When it comes to the Frankfurt school, the
Anglo-Saxon tradition is confronted with all of its worst nightmares in one torrid night

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/apr/01/negative-dialectics-frankfurt-school-adorno/print Page 1 of 3
The Frankfurt school, part 2: Negative dialectics | Peter Thompson | Comment is free | theguardian.com 06/02/2014 12:47

of speculative muscle flexing.

Theodor Adorno opens his treatise on negative dialectics with the statement that "[it] is
a phrase that flouts tradition. As early as Plato, dialectics meant to achieve something
positive by means of negation; the thought figure of the 'negation of the negation' later
became the succinct term. This book seeks to free dialectics from such affirmative traits
without reducing its determinacy." In other words, he asks us to reject the idea that the
outcome of the dialectic will always be positive but that we do so without leaving the
dialectic behind as an explanatory model. We simply have to make it an open rather
than a closed process.

In Hegel the dialectic is widely seen as the means by which, through contradiction and
tension, human history represents the unfolding of human freedom as the expression of
the Weltgeist, or world spirit. Each age has its own zeitgeist (a sort of temporal
appearance on Earth as the expression of the absolute – Christ as God come to Earth, if
you like) but each of those ages is linked and taken up into (aufgehoben) the next
succeeding one. Thus history is not just "one fucking thing after another", as Alan
Bennett has it, but a gradual accretion through contradiction of the necessary stages for
the fulfilment of the absolute. As Ernst Bloch pointed out, werden, or "becoming", was
Hegel's password and history was simply the process of becoming. The dialectic was
thus the way to understand an old idea first put forward by Heraclitus that everything is
constantly in flux, or panta rhei, that the basic condition of the world is change and not
stability. But change towards what?

In Hegel it is the absolute and in Hegel's most famous follower, Marx, it becomes the
liberation of humanity in some form of communist society achieved by the conscious
action of the proletariat in overcoming the final dialectical hurdle by abolishing the
ruling class and thereby, logically, itself. The Marxist dialectic replaces the idealist Geist
of a period working in mysterious ways with the concrete materialist class struggle as
the engine of history, constantly present and constituting history as such.

As early as the end of the 19th century, this Marxist analysis had become "Hegelianised"
in the sense that it was increasingly presented as an automatic and inevitable fulfilment
of a preordained path. Adorno criticised Hegel for giving rise to this by presenting a
positive and affirmative dialectic in which "everything that is real is rational", in that
everything that comes about must contribute in some way to the workings of the
absolute. To use a technical term, this means that in Hegel there is an "identity of
identity and non-identity". In more ordinary language, Hegel is arguing that existence
as a whole constitutes a unity of all opposites, in which everything has its place and that
the tension between these opposites gradually resolves itself into pre-existing whole.

Negative dialectics turns this on its head and says that there is a "non-identity of
identity and non-identity" or that existence is incomplete, that it has a hole in it where
the whole should be, that history is not the simple unfolding of some preordained
noumenal realm and that existence is therefore "ontologically incomplete". It is here
that we find the link between Marx and Freud because, where Marx talks about the
objective material factors at work in history that condition our consciousness (being
determines consciousness) even though we are not necessarily conscious of them, Freud
argues that it is our objective unconscious being, of which we are equally unaware, that
determines our conscious thoughts. The latent content of our dreams is therefore
equated with the latent but as yet unrealised possibilities in human history (see Marx's
letter to Ruge in my previous column).

Adorno's negative dialectics are designed to open up these as yet unrealised possibilities
at both the micro and the macro level, at the level of individual as well as collective

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/apr/01/negative-dialectics-frankfurt-school-adorno/print Page 2 of 3
The Frankfurt school, part 2: Negative dialectics | Peter Thompson | Comment is free | theguardian.com 06/02/2014 12:47

psychology in order to overcome both individual and social suffering. It is the very
contradiction between what is and what might be that allows us to overstep the
boundaries with which we are constantly presented in order to create our endpoint,
rather than simply sleepwalk towards it. This means that we move from necessity to
contingency. In negative dialectics there is no necessity for things to turn out in a
certain way, and the future-orientated teleology that Adorno claimed Hegel followed is
replaced with retrospective teleology in which we can only see that what has happened
to get us to where we are had to happen to get us there, but that there was no necessity
for it happen in that way. Human beings are a product of evolution but evolution is not
there to create human beings. Walter Benjamin famously expressed this as the angel of
history moving backwards into the future with the debris of history piling up around his
feet. Negative dialectics are, in the end then, open dialectics conditioned by contingent
events and not by a pre-given endpoint.

Next week I will look at how this works out in terms of an attempt to break out of the
snow globe of western consumer capitalism. If you want to do some reading in
preparation I would suggest the Dialectic of Enlightenment.

Get the best of Comment is free

The most shared comment, analysis and editorial
articles delivered every weekday lunchtime.

Sign up for the Comment is free email

More from the Guardian What's this? More from around the What's this?

Russian anti-gay gang violence seen for the first time on
camera 01 Feb 2014
Why did Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito have their
convictions upheld? 31 Jan 2014
The man whose 'real Chagall' could now be burnt as a
fake 01 Feb 2014
Janet Yellen and I were taught to revere capitalism. But
it's a failing system 04 Feb 2014
A 'patriotic' state-owned ABC would not serve
Australia's best interests 30 Jan 2014
web
How to avoid a breakdown by spotting the signs of stress
early on (Raconteur)
When John Lennon Quit Heroin, He Wrote a Song
About It [VIDEO] (Mediander)
Hong Kong-born playwright pens tale of the city and its
expat 'filth' (Education Post)
HIstory's 10 Most Accomplished Drunks (OZY)
10 Telling Symptoms of Liver Damage (ActiveBeat)

© 2014 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/apr/01/negative-dialectics-frankfurt-school-adorno/print Page 3 of 3