Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SPE 143282 Bayesian Network Analysis As A Tool For Efficient EOR Screening
SPE 143282 Bayesian Network Analysis As A Tool For Efficient EOR Screening
This paper was prepared for presentation at the SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference held in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 19–21 July 2011.
This paper was selected for presentation by an SPE program committee following review of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents of the paper have not been
reviewed by the Society of Petroleum Engineers and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material does not necessarily reflect any position of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, its
officers, or members. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper without the written consent of the Society of Petroleum Engineers is prohibited. Permission to
reproduce in print is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words; illustrations may not be copied. The abstract must contain conspicuous acknowledgment of SPE copyright.
Abstract. The main tool for screening of EOR techniques is generally based on the criteria presented in a variety of tables
and graphs given in the literature. These data are derived from the basic theory of multiphase fluid flow through porous
media, reservoir simulation, laboratory experiments and existing field-scale experiences. The purpose of this study is to
develop a procedure capable of combining the data extracted from different sources ranging from worldwide field
experiences to the existing tables into a unified expert system. This expert system is based on Bayesian network analysis in
order to sort the proper EOR techniques for further assessment by economical and environmental criteria.
A data bank has been gathered from worldwide EOR/IOR techniques and analyzed using data mining procedure which is
then combined with extracted data from previously published screening tables. Bayesian network quantitative learning
technique was applied to different data combinations from the data bank to train the network which is to serve as the expert
system.
The produced expert system is also applied to the gathered data pertaining to 10 Iranian southwest reservoirs. The results
show that, CO2 flooding can be the most promising among various EOR techniques, which is in agreement with a previous
work. According to this study, considering reservoir characteristics, and excluding the economic limitations, CO2 flooding is
considered as the most efficient EOR method for Iranian carbonate reservoirs under study.
The results show that Bayesian Belief network analysis can be successful in the prediction of proper EOR technique by
providing sufficient Data to train the network.
1. Introduction
The problem of EOR Screening for the purpose of selection and implementation of proper EOR techniques for a specific
reservoir with special oil and rock properties is addressed in several papers as a guide for petroleum engineers. One of the
first studies on EOR screening can be considered as the publication by Taber et al. (Taber & Martin, 1983), which uses the
available data on screening to summarize EOR screening criteria in a single table and also presents EOR spectrum by simple
∗
Corresponding Author, P.O. Box 71345-1719 Shiraz, Iran
shahab@shirazu.ac.ir
2 SPE 143282
graphical techniques. Guerillot (Guerillot, 1983), utilized artificial intelligence for the selection of proper EOR techniques.
This developed expert system was able to propose reasonable descriptions for the selection of each EOR technique, based on
fuzzy logic. The first computer based program was proposed by Parkinson et.al (Parkinson et.al, 1994), resulted in the
technical selection of a few feasible techniques in the first place for further economical investigations. Taber et al. (Taber et
al., 1997), proposed some criteria for most EOR techniques based on reservoir Data through the investigation of EOR
mechanisms. Alvarado et.al (Alvarado et.al, 2002), collected a series of data on EOR screening projects all around the world
and made use of space reduction techniques to show the existing correlations in parameter variations.
Nowadays, with the aid of computers, artificial intelligence (AI) has become an inseparable part of engineering predictions
and EOR screening has also been imparted this gift. Although the application of Artificial Intelligence techniques for
chemical engineering and oil industry problems dates back to a couple of decades, few steps have been taken for the
introduction of Bayesian Belief Networks in these fields. Various AI techniques have been examined for this purpose a few
of which can be summarized as follows: The design of artificial neural networks (ANN) by Genetic Algorithm (GA) in the
estimation of reservoir permeability is one of the AI applications in oil industry (Morooka et al., 2001). The application of
GA for a full description of reservoir through estimation of other parameters such as porosity and recovery rate can be
counted as another application in this field (Romero et al., 2001). The application of neural networks in the exploration and
production is also examined in oil industry. The reservoir petro and geo-physical Data can be fed to ANN for characterization
of fracture types and the estimation of pressure distribution in the reservoir (Greffioz et al., 1993). ANN has also been used in
the determination of petroleum physical properties through the correlation of these parameters to other known variables such
as temperature, pressure and natural boiling point (Aminzadeh, 2005).
A series of publications by Shahab Mohaghegh (Mohaghegh et al., 2001, 2005; Rolon & Mohaghegh, 2009) investigates the
application of several AI techniques in oil and gas reservoir characterization and reservoir log generation. Bayesian Network
analysis which is commonly used in various fields for risk assessment (Biedermann et al., 2005) is also applied to a few
petroleum industry problems (Carter et al., 2006). This technique has been applied successfully to predict asphaltene
precipitation by using Data sources measured in laboratory and also gathered from literature (Sayyad Amin et al., 2010).
A B
E D
F G
parents with (marginal) probability distribution P (a ) , where the domain of a is the set of values that A takes on with non-
zero probability (prior probability).
A key advantage of Bayesian networks is their synthesized representation of probabilistic relationships. In fact, it is necessary
to consider only the known independencies among the variables in a domain, rather than specifying a complete joint
probability distribution. The independencies declared at modeling time are then used to infer beliefs for all variables in the
network (De Cristo et al., 2003)
The limitation of Bayesian method is its subjectivity, especially for the establishment of prior belief. A few possible
applications of Bayesian analysis can be amounted as: proposed risk assessment of nuclear waste disposal is calculated by
Bayesian network (Lee et al., 2005). Bayesian approach is also used for a flow-field modeling to determine the greatest
model uncertainty at the model boundaries (Abbaspour et al., 2000). Parameters estimation characterizing the hydrodynamic
behavior of aquifers is done by Bayesian method (Ferraresi et al., 1996). Probabilistic expert systems are developed to
produce a geographic distribution for the most probable sources of salinization by Bayesian belief networks methods
(Ghabayen et al., 2006).
3. Data Collection
In general, the Data available in the literature on EOR screening criteria fall into three main categories: (1) Laboratory tests
have been done to check the feasibility of specific EOR process for known reservoir with fluids and rocks available.
Experimental data available from these tests comprise the main core of Data usually used for EOR screening. (2) The second
category is comprised of the Data produced from the simulation of oil reservoirs under EOR processes mostly by using
commercial reservoir simulation software. (3) However, the most reliable category of information would be the specifications
of reservoirs under successful EOR projects, whose technical and economical capabilities are proved practically. This last
category can be considered the most reliable adequate information especially in AI techniques as it takes into account the
whole essential criteria. Several EOR screening criteria in the form of tables have been proposed in the literature considering
rock and fluid properties of oil reservoirs. The first table of this type is introduced by Taber et.al (Taber et. al. 1988), which
4 SPE 143282
suggests a special EOR technique in every given parameter range. Also, Taber has modified his table (Taber et. al. 1997) by
using new data series and considering economical criteria in the investigations.
Some EOR processes such as miscible CO2 flooding have found special attention and special tables are produced for them by
some researchers (Klins 1984, Carcoana 1982). In another work (Picha, 2007) represents an updated screening criteria table
for four EOR methods, considering the importance of CO2 flooding techniques and also the enhanced heavy oil production in
recent years.
Field Data used in this study is mostly extracted from a series of worldwide EOR surveys on field-scale successful EOR
projects around the world (Worldwide EOR Survey, Oil & Gas J., 1994-2006). The gathered data are processed with data
mining procedures for the selection of the most proper series in order to yield the best results in training process.
Thorough investigation of gathered data proves the indeterminacy and similarities existent in various experiments which
makes it necessary the utilization of an AI technique capable of decision making accompanied with probability and giving
spectral answers rather than one-to-one conformity; the abilities inherent in Bayesian Analysis.
2. Chemical Flooding;
a) Surfactant flooding
b) Alkaline flooding
c) ASP flooding (Various Configurations)
d) Polymer flooding
4. New Methods;
a) Microbial Flooding
There are several general parameters which influence the selection of a special EOR process for a certain reservoir with
unique rock and fluid properties. Also, there are some parameters only relevant to a particular EOR technique. Generally, the
whole influential parameters can be categorized into two major categories. The first category is the reservoir properties and
the second properties related to the reservoir fluid. General properties of the reservoir can be counted as porosity,
permeability, reservoir formation type, reservoir depth, etc. On the other hand, oil density and viscosity are two examples of
fluid properties. In addition, there are some unique properties in the investigation of particular EOR techniques which are
presented in the next sections. Here, some important properties and their effect on various oil recovery processes are
described.
3.1.1 Porosity
Reservoir porosity accompanied by reservoir volume will determine the amount of oil in place. In a homogenous reservoir
with fairly connected pores, the permeability of the reservoir rock is increased by increasing the porosity. In some cases such
as polymer flooding, the porosity should be more than a definite value in order to be suitable for polymer permeation through
the pore network. Fig. 2 presents the variations of porosity in different reservoirs under successful EOR production around
the world. These EOR techniques are considered to be thermal techniques (including steam flooding, hot water injection and
in situ combustion), miscible flooding (CO2 and hydrocarbon flooding) and immiscible flooding (CO2 and Nitrogen
injection), polymer injection and microbial flooding respectively from left to right. As it is shown in Fig. 2 the average
porosity is 22 % and porosity ranges from 1 % and 60 %. It is obvious that thermal EOR techniques entail comparatively
higher porosities.
Fig. 2 The porosities of reservoirs under successful EOR processes in different parts of the world
6 SPE 143282
3.1.2 Permeability
Increasing the rock permeability which results in decreasing the injection pressure leads to the improvement of production
efficiency. There is a determined range for permeability that polymer molecules are blocked and can't permeate through the
reservoir. The selection of an appropriate molecular weight distribution for polymer would decrease such a limitation. On the
other hand, in some cases selective plugging using especial materials such as polymers are used to increase the possibility of
oil production from un-swept zones. The disparity of reservoir permeability is shown in Fig 3. Although it seems there are
many oscillations in the permeability variation range, but the major part of data varies between 1 to 10000 mD with average
permeability as 870 mD.
Fig. 3 Permeabilities of reservoirs under successful EOR processes in different parts of the world
practical on reservoirs with depths falling between 500 and 5000 ft. The upper limit (500 ft) is considered due to the required
steam pressure. The lower limit (5000 ft) is established because of high amount of heat loss from injection wells at high
depths. By getting closer to 5000 ft, heat loss increases intensely even by utilizing properly isolating measures.
In addition, as reservoir depth increases, the required injection pressure is increased as well. In such a condition, the
condensable fraction of steam decreases and it results in the reduction of sweep efficiency. These variations are displayed in
Fig. 4. As is obvious from Fig. 4, reservoirs depths under successful EOR projects range from 200 ft and 18500 ft and the
average depth is 4715 ft.
Fig. 4 The depths variations of different reservoirs all around the world
Fig. 5 The viscosities of reservoirs under successful EOR processes in different parts of the world
Fig. 6 The specific gravities of reservoirs under successful EOR processes in different parts of the world
Fig. 7 The temperatures of reservoirs under successful EOR processes in different parts of the world
Fig. 8 The saturations of reservoirs under successful EOR processes in different parts of the world
Table 1. Test of trained network by the same Data set (Taber Table)
The numbers on the main diagonal represent the number of Data predicted correctly as they were checked by Taber screening
criteria. The reported error rate is a criterion of the amount of data domain entanglement. The Data rather than the main
diagonal represent the number of wrong perditions.
Another network is then trained by using the Data collected from world oil reservoirs under successful EOR processes, which
consist of 1098 Data lines. The results of testing this trained network by the same Data set are shown in Table 2, which lacks
an accurate prediction in most cases:
Table 2. Test of trained network by the same Data set (Field Data)
Table 3. Test of trained network by the same Data set (Field Data without saturation)
Porosity Porosity
Porosity1 0 Temperature Temperature
Porosity1 0
Porosity2 0 Temp1 0 Porosity2 0 Temp1 0
Porosity3 100 EO R Temp2 0 EO R Temp2 0
Porosity3 0
Porosity4 0 Steam 21.6 Temp3 0 Porosity4 100 Steam 16.9 Temp3 0
25.5 ± 2.6
Combustion 21.6 Temp4 100 Combustion 22.7 Temp4 100
CO2miscible 21.3 65 ± 20 CO2miscible 19.3
240 ± 49 240 ± 49
HCmiscible 17.9 HCmiscible 23.1
Polymer 17.5 Polymer 18.0
Permeability Permeability
Perm1 0 Viscosity Viscosity
Perm1 0
Perm2 100 Viscosity1 0 Perm2 0 Viscosity1 0
Perm3 0 Viscosity2 0 Perm3 0 Viscosity2 0
Perm4 0 Viscosity3 0 Perm4 100 Viscosity3 0
Viscosity4 100 50500 ± 29000 Viscosity4 100
106 ± 55
40300 ± 23000 40300 ± 23000
Fig 8. A typical answer of the trained network with field data with Fig 9. A typical answer of the trained network with field data with
exclusion of saturation and porosity parameters. Porosity [21-30]; Perm. exclusion of saturation and porosity parameters. Porosity [30-100];
[11-200]; Depth [6350-4550]; Gravity [0-14]; Viscosity [580-80000]; Perm. [1000-100000]; Depth [1800-4550]; Gravity [31-38]; Viscosity
Temp. [154-325], which predicts almost the same probability for all [580-80000]; Temp. [154-325], which predicts almost the same
methods. probability for all methods.
Porosity Porosity
Porosity1 0 Temperature Temperature
Porosity1 0
Porosity2 0 Temp1 0 Porosity2 0 Temp1 0
Porosity3 100 EO R Temp2 0 Porosity3 100 EO R Temp2 0
Porosity4 0 Steam 0.64 Temp3 0 Porosity4 0 Steam 0.76 Temp3 100
25.5 ± 2.6
Combustion 0.72 Temp4 100 Combustion 0.74 Temp4 0
CO2miscible 97.2 25.5 ± 2.6 CO2miscible 0.73
240 ± 49 132 ± 13
HCmiscible 0.71 HCmiscible 0.73
Polymer 0.70 Polymer 97.0
Permeability Permeability
Perm1 0 Viscosity Perm1 0 Viscosity
Perm2 0 Viscosity1 0 Perm2 0 Viscosity1 0
Perm3 100 Viscosity2 0 Perm3 100 Viscosity2 0
Perm4 0 Viscosity3 100 Perm4 0 Viscosity3 100
600 ± 230 Viscosity4 0 600 ± 230 Viscosity4 0
291 ± 170 291 ± 170
Fig 10. A typical answer of the trained network with field data with Fig 11. A typical answer of the trained network with field data with
exclusion of saturation and porosity parameters. Porosity [21-30]; exclusion of saturation and porosity parameters. Porosity [21-30];
Perm. [200-1000]; Depth [6350-18500]; Gravity [36-60]; Viscosity Perm. [200-1000]; Depth [6350-4550]; Gravity [14-31]; Viscosity
[2.5-580]; Temp. [154-325], which predicts miscible CO2 injection [2.5-580]; Temp. [110-154], which predicts polymer injection with
with 97% probability. 97% probability.
12 SPE 143282
Then the Data are analyzed by the removal of both saturation and porosity the results of which are presented in Table 4:
Table 4. Test of trained network by the same Data set (Field Data without saturation and porosity)
The slight enhancement of error in prediction proves that porosity can be an influential parameter although we are obliged to
omit it in the final Data set. Finally, the network is trained and tested by a combination of field and Taber Data the results of
which are presented in Table 5:
Table 5. Test of trained network by the same Data set (Field and Taber Data without saturation and porosity)
The results extracted from the network in different domains are presented in Figs. 12 to 17.
Permeability EO R
Temperature
Permeability EO R
Temperature
Perm1 0 Steam 1.38 Temp1 100
Perm1 0 Steam 40.1 Temp1 100 Perm2 100 Combustion 1.36 Temp2 0
Perm2 100 Combustion 0.61 Temp2 0 Perm3 0 CO2miscible 48.0 Temp3 0
Perm3 0 CO2miscible 37.0 Temp3 0 Perm4 0 HCmiscible 48.0 Temp4 0
Perm4 0 HCmiscible 11.1 Temp4 0 106 ± 55 Polymer 1.34 50 ± 29
106 ± 55 Polymer 11.1 50 ± 29
Fig 13. A typical answer of the trained network with a combination of field and Taber
Fig 12. A typical answer of the trained network with a combination of field and Data excluding saturation and porosity parameters which predicts both hydrocarbon
Taber Data excluding saturation and porosity parameters and CO2on miscible techniques with the same probability.
SPE 143282 13
Fig 14. A typical answer of the trained network with a combination of field and Fig 15. A typical answer of the trained network with a combination of field and
Taber Data excluding saturation and porosity parameters. Taber Data excluding saturation and porosity parameters
Permeability EO R
Temperature Permeability Temperature
EO R
Perm1 0 Steam 53.9 Temp1 0 Perm1 0 Steam 1.04 Temp1 0
Perm2 100 Combustion 26.6 Temp2 100 Perm2 0 Combustion 10.4 Temp2 0
Perm3 0 CO2miscible 1.01 Temp3 0 Perm3 100 CO2miscible 17.8 Temp3 0
Perm4 0 HCmiscible 1.03 Temp4 0 Perm4 0 HCmiscible 69.7 Temp4 100
106 ± 55 Polymer 17.5 105 ± 2.9 600 ± 230 Polymer 1.05 240 ± 49
Fig 16. A typical answer of the trained network with a combination of field and Fig 17. A typical answer of the trained network with a combination of field and
Taber Data excluding saturation and porosity parameters. Taber Data excluding saturation and porosity parameters.
Table 6. Test of trained network by 10% of the data Removed off the training set
In order to check the network ability for correct prediction through untrained domains, the network is tested by 10% of the
Data removed off the training Data Set. The results are presented in Table 6 which turns out to be acceptable.
The produced expert system is also applied to the gathered data pertaining to 10 Iranian southwest reservoirs. The results
show that, CO2 flooding can be the most promising among various EOR techniques, which is in agreement with a previous
work (Kord et al., 2008). According to this study, considering reservoir characteristics, and excluding the economic
limitations, CO2 flooding is considered as the most efficient EOR method for Iranian carbonate reservoirs under study.
5. Conclusions
The number of data available turns out to be determining and lack of sufficient data results in wrong predictions, particularly
through untrained domains. In order to check the network ability for correct prediction through untrained domains, the
network is tested by 10% of the Data removed off the training Data Set. The results are acceptable relative to the number of
Data used for training.
14 SPE 143282
The produced expert system is also applied to the gathered data pertaining to 10 south-west Iranian reservoirs. The results
show that, CO2 flooding can be the most promising among various EOR techniques.
References
Abbaspour, K., Matta, V., Huggenberger, P., Johnson, C.A., 2000. A contaminated site investigation: comparison of
information gained from geophysical measurements and hydro-geological modeling, J. Contaminant Hydrology. 40, 365-380.
Abolhoseini, H., 2004. Study on Ultimate Heavy Oil Recovery from Zaqeh Field in S.W of Iran, SPE 88861, 11th Abu
Dhabi international Petroleum Exhib. & Conf., Abu Dhabi, U.A.E., 10th-13th Oct.
Al-Bahar, M.A., Merrill, R., Peake, W., Jumaa, M., Oskui, R., 2004. Evaluation of IOR Potential within Kuwait, SPE
88716, 11th Abu Dhabi international Petroleum Exhib. & Conf., Abu Dhabi, U.A.E., 10th-13th Oct.
Alkafeef, S.F., Alforgi, M.Z., 2007. Review of and Outlook for Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques in Kuwait Oil
Reservoirs, IPTC 11234, International Petroleum Technology Conf., Dubai, U.A.E., 4th-6th Dec.
Alvarado V., Ranson A., Hernandez K., Manrique E., Matheus J., Liscano T., Prosperi N., 2002. Selection of EOR/IOR
Opportunities Based on Machine Learning, SPE 78332, 13th European Petroleum Conf., Aberdeen, U.K., 29–31.
Aminzadeh,F., 2005. Applications of AI and soft computing for challenging problems in the oil industry, J. Pet. Sci. &
Eng., 47, 5-14.
Biedermann, A., Taroni, F., Delemont, O., Semadeni, C., Davison, A.C., 2005. The evaluation of evidence in the forensic
investigation of fire incidents. Part II. Practical examples of the use of Bayesian networks, Forensic Science International,
147, 59-69.
Carcoana, A., 1982. Enhanced Oil Recovery in Romania, Proceedings of 3rd Joint SPE/DOE Symposium on Enhanced Oil
Recovery, SPE of AIME, Dallas, TX, 367-379.
Carter, J.N., Ballester, P.J., Tavassoli, Z., King, P.R., 2006. Our calibrated model has poor predictive value: An example
from the petroleum industry, Reliability Eng. & Sys. Safety. 91, 1373-1381.
De Cristo, M.A.P., Calado, P.P., Silva, M.L.S.I., Muntz, R., Ribeiro-Neto, B., 2003. Bayesian belief networks for IR,
International J. Approximate Reasoning. 34, 163-179.
Ferraresi, M., Todinia, E., Vignolib, R., 1996. A solution to the inverse problem in groundwater hydrology based on
kalman filtering, J. of Hydrology. 175, 567-581.
Ghabayen, S.M.S., McKee, M., Kemblowski, M., 2006. Ionic and isotopic ratios for identification of salinity sources and
missing data in the gaza aquifer, J. of Hydrology. 318, 360–373.
Greffioz J., Olver, A.J., Schirmer, P., 1993. TOPEX: an expert system for estimating and analyzing the operating costs of
oil and gas production facilities, SPE 25315, Asia Pac. Oil Gas Conf., Singapore, Feb. 8th–10th
Guerillot, D.R., 1983. EOR Screening With an Expert System, SPE 17791
Hunedi, S., Danquigny, J., Morel, D., Maubeuge, F., Guarrino, A. 2005. Applicability of Enhanced Oil Recovery
Techniques on Mature Fields-Interest of Gas Injection, SPE 93368, 14th SPE Middle East Oil & Gas Show and Conf.,
Bahrain International Exhibition Centre, Bahrain, 12th-15th March
SPE 143282 15
Klins, M.A., 1984. Carbon Dioxide Flooding: Basic Mechanisms and Project Design, International Human Resources
Development Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts, 267-275.
Korb, K.B., Nicholson, A.E., 2004. Bayesian artificial intelligence, Chapman & Hall/CRC
Kord, Sh., Zerafat, M.M., Ayatollahi, Sh., Zobeidi, K., 2008. Screening of Iranian Carbonate Petroleum Reservoirs for
CO2 injection, 12th Iranian Chem. Eng. Congress (IChEC12), Tabriz, Iran, Sahand Uni. Tech., 21th-23th Oct.
Lee, C.J., Lee, K.J., 2005. Application of bayesian network to the probabilistic risk assessment of nuclear waste disposal,
Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 9, 1-18.
Mathiassen, O. M., CO2 as Injection Gas for Enhanced Oil Recovery and Estimation of the Potential on the Norwegian
Continental Shelf, NTNU – Norwegian University of Science and Technology Department of Pet. Eng. & App. Geophy.
Mohaghegh, Sh.D., Richardson, M., Ameri, S., 2001. Use of intelligent systems in reservoir characterization via synthetic
magnetic resonance logs, J. Pet. Sci. & Eng. 29, 189–204.
Mohaghegh, Sh.D., 2005. A new methodology for the identification of best practices in the oil and gas industry using
intelligent systems, J. Pet. Sci. & Eng. 49, 239-260.
Morooka, C.K., Guilherme, I.R., Mendes, J.R.P., 2001. Development of intelligent systems for well drilling and
petroleum production, (2001). 32, 191-199.
Neapolitan, R.E., 1990. Probabilistic Reasoning in Expert Systems: Theory and Algorithms, John Wiley & Sons, New
York.
Parkinson, W.J., Luger, G.F., Bretz, R.E., Osowski, J., 1994. Using an expert system to explore enhanced oil recovery
methods, com. elect. Eng. 20, 2, 181-197.
Pearl, J., 1991. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference, Morgan Kaufmann, San
Mateo, CA. 2nd Ed.
Picha, M.Sh., 2007. Enhanced Oil Recovery by Hot CO2 Flooding, SPE 10542, 15th SPE Middle East Oil & Gas Show
and Conf., Bahrain International Exhibition Centre, Bahrain, 11th-14th March
Rolon, L., Mohaghegh, Sh. D., Ameri, S., Gaskari, R., McDaniel, B., 2009. Using artificial neural networks to generate
synthetic well logs, J. Natural Gas Sci. & Eng. 1, 118-133.
Romero, C.E., Carter, J.N., 2001. Using genetic algorithms for reservoir characterization, J. Pet. Sci. & Eng. 31, 113–123
Sayyad Amin, J., Alamdari, A., Mehranbod, N., Ayatollahi, Sh., Nikooee, E., 2010. Prediction of Asphaltene
Precipitation: Learning from Data at Different Conditions, Energy & Fuels. 24, 4046-4053.
Spiegelhalter, D.J., Dawid, A.Ph., Lauritzen, S.L., Cowell, R.G., 1993. Bayesian analysis in expert systems, Stat. Sci. 8,
3, 219-283.
Taber, J.J., Martin F.D., 1983. Technical Screening Guides for the Enhanced Recovery of Oil, SPE 12069, 58th Annual
Technical Conf. & Exhib., San Francisco, CA, 5th-8th Oct.
Taber, J.J., Martin, F.D., Seright, R.S., 1997. EOR Screening Criteria Revisited - Part 1: Introduction to Screening
Criteria and Enhanced Recovery Field Projects, SPE 35385, SPE Reservoir Engineering Journal, 189-198.
16 SPE 143282
Enhanced Oil Recovery Potential in the United States, 1978. Office of Technology Assessment, Congress of the United
States, NTIS Order # PB-276594; 12 Vols.
1996 worldwide EOR survey, 1996. Oil & Gas J. 94, 16, 45.
1998 worldwide EOR survey, 1998. Oil & Gas J. 96, 16, 59.
2002 worldwide EOR survey, 2002. Oil & Gas J. 100, 15, 71.
2004 worldwide EOR survey, 2004. Oil & Gas J. 102, 14, 53.
2006 worldwide EOR survey, 2006. Oil & Gas J. 104, 15, 45.