You are on page 1of 3

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, plaintiff-appellee, vs.

ALFREDO CAGALINGAN y
ROMINA, JOVITO CAGALINGAN y ROMINA and VICTOR ROMINA, JR. y VELANCIO,
defendants-appellants.

Facts:

 Lory Bunabon saw the accused Jovito Cagalingan holding a basket


containing claws of crabs. Joemar Desor (the victim) approached Jovito, took
hold of the basket, and jokingly asked the latter to give him the crabs so that he
could roast them. Jovito refused saying that he was bringing them home for their
viand.

 Each of them was grappling for the possession of the basket In order to gain
advantage over Jovito to secure the possession of the basket, Joemar held the
throat of Jovito with his right hand. Jovito however was able to remove the hand
of Joemar and went at the back of the latter.

 Veron Cagalingan, wife of Alfredo Cagalingan, saw them and shouted that Jovito
was being killed by Joemar. This impelled accused Alfredo Cagalingan to went
behind Joemar and stabbed him twice on the right side of his body.

 Jovito who was able to free himself from Joemar drew his nineinch kitchen knife
from his waist and also stabbed the victim twice.

 While the stabbing was being perpetrated, accused Victor Romina, Jr. jumped
out of the window of his house to join the other accused. Using a nine-inch
kitchen knife, he also stabbed Joemar once. The latter at the time was already
immobile, lying prostrate on the ground.

Defense of the accused:

Alfredo Cagalingan

 Admitting having inflicted injuries upon the deceased Joemar Desor, insisted that
he acted in legitimate defense of his brother when he inflicted the mortal wounds
which resulted in the death of the said Joemar Desor.
 He saw Joemar Desor on top of his brother Jovito, lying on the ground being
strangulated by Joemar. He went to pacify Joemar telling him 'do not do that
manong we are but one.' Joemar answered 'even all of you.' When Joemar partly
unsheathed his knife he stabbed him several times with a big bolo.

Jovito Cagalingan

 Denied having stabbed the deceased Joemar Desor.

 While he was on his way home, at about 1:00 o'clock in the afternoon of 4 June
1984, he was suddenly boxed on his right cheek by Joemar Desor. He just cried
and went away because Joemar Desor was bigger than he and was the
recognized "kingpin" of the neighborhood.

 When he fell, Joemar Desor went astride him and sat on his belly, and then held
his neck, choking him. As a result, he lost consciousness.

Victor Romina, Jr.

 denied having stabbed the deceased Joemar Desor and interposed the defense
of alibi.

 at about 12:20 o'clock in the afternoon of 4 June 1984, he went to see a movie at
the Ryan Cinema with his friend, one Ferdinand from Faire, Cagayan. At around
3:00 o'clock in the afternoon, his name was flashed on the screen of the cinema
as "wanted outside". He went outside and was met by policemen who then
arrested him and brought him to the police station for investigation.

 His testimony was corroborated by Ferdinand Ugale who declared that he and
Victor Romina, Jr. went to see a movie at the Ryan Cinema at about 12:30
o'clock in the afternoon of 4 June 1984;

ISSUE: Whether or not the accused should be classified as principal in the said felony.

Ruling:

 Conspiracy; A person who assaults a victim already fatally wounded by another


is an accomplice; Case at bar. —We find, however, that Jovito Cagalingan and
Victor Romina, Jr. are only accomplices in the crime since their participations
therein were not absolutely indispensable in the commission of the crime. Lory
Bunabon declared that Jovito Cagalingan stabbed the deceased Joemar Desor
after Alfredo Cagalingan had stabbed the deceased at the back, while Victor
Romina, Jr. stabbed the said deceased while the latter was already lying
prostrate on the ground. While the acts of Jovito Cagalingan and Victor Romina,
Jr. show a community of design with the principal, Alfredo Cagalingan, who
inflicted the fatal wound, and they (Jovito and Victor) cooperated in hastening the
victim's death, the said appellants' acts were not absolutely indispensable in the
commission of the crime. A person who assaults a victim already fatally
wounded by another is only regarded as an accomplice.

You might also like