Vox Populi

The voice of the people!

BY: James Hardin
Amended/Rev. 8/28/2023

James D. Hardin

1
 12061 Merrill Hts.
Peyton, Colorado 80831
(719) 377-1623
iam.number8@yahoo.com

August 28, 2023

ATTN: Executive Director, Mark Ferrandino

Colorado Department of Revenue
1881 Pierce Street
Lakewood, Colorado 80214

IN RE: Disagree, Dispute and Protest of all 5 Letters:

Tax: Indiv Income
Account: 95038396
Letter: L0520000016; L0597766672; L1862177296; L0433601040;
L1357265424; & “L0296818192”
Source: DIS - NR
Period: Dec 31, 2016 and 2017

Notice to Cease and Desist pursuant to

Title 18, U.S.C. Section 241 & 242

Dear Executive Director, Mark Ferrandino:

I am in receipt of your letters dated April 21, 2023. Please accept this communication as my
follow up; and expanded official response to the heretofore stated letters dated April 21, 2023 and June 7,
2023 for which this is my follow up (expanded official response to let you know that I disagree, I dispute, I
object and I protest all 5 of the letters, to wit:

1. Notice of Deficiency or Rejection of Refund Claim (L0520000016)

2. Statement of Account/Payment Coupon/Bill for $3,846.00 (L0597766672)

3. Income Tax Account Changes/Period Covered: 2017 (L1862177296)

4. Notice of Final Determination and Demand For Payment (L0433601040)

5. Statement of Account/Payment Coupon/Bill for $4,036.00 (L1357265424)

I further request that this and my prior response dated June 14, 2023, along with all their attachments and
exhibits be made a permanent part of my State and Federal Income Tax Records.

and…

James D. Hardin

2
 12061 Merrill Hts.
Peyton, Colorado 80831
(719) 377-1623
iam.number8@yahoo.com

August 28, 2023

ATTN: Executive Director, Mark Ferrandino

Colorado Department of Revenue
1881 Pierce Street
Lakewood, Colorado 80214

IN RE: Disagree, Dispute and Protest of all 6 Letters:

Tax: Indiv Income

Account: 95038396
Letter: L0520000016; L0597766672; L1862177296; L0433601040;
L1357265424; & “L0296818192”
Source: DIS - NR
Period: Dec 31, 2016 and 2017

Notice to Cease and Desist pursuant to

Title 18, U.S.C. Section 241 & 242

Dear Executive Director, Mark Ferrandino:

I am in receipt of your letter dated July 18, 2023, which I received by mail on July 25, 2023. It is
regrettable that it is completely devoid of any response or rebuttals to my strongly held, or firmly held
beliefs as expressed in my prior communication and I will therefore consider CDOR & DORA to be
nonresponsive to my Notice of Counter Claim, my FOIA Request, my Colorado Open Records Act
Request, my demand for Foreign Agent Registrations, Statements, Amendments, and the like.

I must also say that I am highly disappointed in the fact that “The Department” decided to use prewritten
can letter response paragraphs speaking in generalities and wholly failing to refute one single thing I argued
with “Specificity”. The July 18, 2023 communication is obviously in bad faith, when it starts out of the
gate by arguing Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189 (1920), Supreme Court Case pertaining to income being
defined. It is amusing to witness either 1) the gross ignorance of those within “The Department”; or 2)
shows the premeditated criminal intent of said State Agents RICO Conspiracy and Premeditated activities
of the Criminal Enterprise; and whom The Books evidence are the real parties of interest and are the
Criminal Tax Evaders, if there are any at all. .

The point here is that for “The Department” to open with this paragraph, when they know damn well that
the herein Respondent has never received a gift, nor even owned stock, for which could be considered a
“Capital Gain” and the agents already know not one scintilla of any of the money Respondent has ever
been paid could possibly be construed to include Capital Gain’s Taxes. All of this is summary judgment
evidence that the State, The Department, or any underlings thereof are acting in Bad Faith, with Unclean
Hands, Deceptive Trade Practices, Fraud, Extortion, Organized Crime and the like and for these hypocrites
to act like

and…

3
 DEMAND FOR A FULL AUDIT

The Respondent hereby makes Demand upon “The Executive Director” and upon “The
Department”; and demands a full audit of the Respondent’s records from the years 2014
to the present, 2023. The Respondent further Demands copies of all the same audit
documents be provided to the Respondent in full.

The latest correspondence from “The Department” further stated that:

“We will not engage in a debate with you on the legality of our Tax System. All of the issues
you have raised have been advanced previously by other individuals or groups and have
been rejected by the courts.”

However, those identified as “We” (Plural – two or more, qualifying under the RICO
Statutes), again failed to clarify with specificity what arguments being made by the herein
Respondent, have been rejected by the courts? STOP HIDING behind your Corporate
veil and making unlawful threats and SPEAK from outside the Corporate Veil… and
preferably face-to-face… I DEMAND THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DISCLOSE
WITH SPECIFICITY, EXACTLY WHAT ARGUMENTS MADE BY THE
RESPONDENT HAVE THE COURTS ALREADY REJECTED?

Because, based upon the facts and arguments in the record of communications so far,
between The Department, The Executive Director and the herein Respondent, the first
two are the ones making statements, such as those regarding the 16 TH AMENDMENT,
which are and have been rejected by the courts. In fact, The Executive Director’s 16 TH
Amendment arguments have been rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court. Both, “THE
DEPARTMENT” and the “EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR” deceptively claim that the 16 TH
AMENDMENT gave Congress additional taxing powers. Yet contrary to their false and
fraudulent claims, the courts have already rejected the arguments of The Department and
the Executive Director. But the U.S. Supreme Court Rulings are consistent with the
arguments of the Respondent.

Wherefore, the herein Respondent would like to get clarification on this matter. So, is it
still the argument of “The Department” or of the “Executive Director” that the herein
Respondent is wrong when claiming:

1) “The Department” is clearly ACTING WITHOUT DELEGATED AUTHORITY in

Respondent’s case, because “The Department” is beyond their Statute of Limitations and are
actually attempting to commit a theft under Color of Law?;

2) Or, was it Respondent’s quote from the Congressional Record dated March 27, 1943 (page
2580); whereby a former regulation writing lawyer for the Treasury Department explained it
the best, when stating:

“The income tax is, therefore, not a tax on income as such.   It is an excise tax
with respect to certain activities and privileges which is measured by reference to the
income which they produce. The income is not the subject of the tax: it is the basis for
determining the amount of the tax.”;

4
3) Or, was it Respondent quoting the two controlling Tax cases in existence, as found in
“ancient documents” (i.e.) “Treasury Decision 2303” for clarifications from all the way
back in 1916, when the Secretary of the Treasury and the Supreme Court (Stanton v. Baltic
Mining and Brushaber v. Union Pacific) stated that the 16th Amendment did not
give Congress new powers to tax and that the income tax is an indirect “excise” tax which
never required “apportionment.”  

“The provisions of the sixteenth amendment conferred no new power of taxation, but

simply prohibited [Congress’ original power to tax incomes] from being taken out of
the category of indirect taxation, to which it inherently belonged, and being placed in
the category of direct taxation subject to apportionment.”   [Treasury Decision 2303,
1916]

4) “The Department” is limited pursuant to the Colorado Revised Statutes, as evidenced in

“Title 39. Taxation § 39-26-125. Limitations… has the same Statute of Limitations as the
IRS, plus one year. That is to say three years + one year is all the time that the State has, to
impose Taxes, assessments of penalties, or interest must be assessed within three years of
their due date. (¶61-520, Statute of Limitations) Taxes, penalties, or interest must be
assessed within three years of their due date. ( Sec. 39-26-125, C.R.S., ¶96-077; Sec. 39-
26-210, C.R.S., ¶96-118) The three-year Statute of Limitations also applies to the filing of
lien notices, issuance of distraint warrants, and commencement of collection suits?; (As a
side note, I wonder if the Department files Amended Returns for all those accounts which
they do collections on in the fourth year, or after, seven years later in my case? So, I would
like to see The Department’s Returns; and Amended Returns from 2016 and forward to the
present year, which are applicable to Respondent by name (James Hardin), by account
number (95038396), or by SSN (459-67-0787); or

5) “The Department” is further limited in its Delegated Powers and Authority’s, whereby No
lien may continue beyond the three-year limitation period except for taxes assessed and
notices of lien filed before the expiration of such period; in such cases, the lien will continue
only for one year after the filing of the notice. However, taxes, penalties, and interest, may be
assessed, or proceedings for the collection of such amounts may be begun, at any time when
a fraudulent return is filed with the intent to evade tax. The herein Respondent doesn’t
believe that there is any disputes between the Respondent and the A taxpayer and the
Executive Director of the Department of Revenue may agree in writing to extend the
limitation period, and the extended period may be extended again by subsequent agreements
in writing?; or

6) “The Department” is illegally attempting to collect a debt not owed, in further violation of
the “Fair Debt Collection Practices Act” (See: 15 USC 1601 note; and 15 USC 1692); or

7) “The Department” is claiming to be subject to Federal Banking and Taxing Laws, yet
CDOR has been acting contrary to the February 3, 2023 IRS Notice saying Taxpayers in the
following states won’t need to report state rebates as income: … names Colorado… and
further states to make sure your state return(s) are not selected for electronic filing. So
Respondent would like to know how this ever occurred, in the case with Respondent, James
Hardin, Account number: 95038396, when the Respondent did not, at any time whatsoever,
authorize anyone to do this on Respondent’s behalf.; or

8) “The Department” is well aware that Respondent has filed numerous written complaints,
both online and by certified mailings in an attempt to correct Respondent’s accounts, along
with stopping and/or preventing any and all unlawful collection attempts; and has to date,
NEVER been provided with a means to obtain Respondent’s account online or otherwise.

5
 Even though the Respondent has filed multiple complaints and has still NEVER received a
“Validation Key Letter”; or

9) “The Department” is well aware that the herein Respondent filed a complaint with the Tax
Payers Advocates office, whom acknowledged receipt of the complaint, saying it could be
three days before somebody would contact Respondent back. However, the Tax Advocates
Office has rather chosen to aid and abet the that RICO Criminal element within CDOR; and
should therefore, be prosecuted along with those within CDOR, which has become absolutely
corrupted.; or

10) “The Department” has been non-responsive over the past year of their targeted thefts as it
pertains to complaints filed by Respondent, the request for information, FOIA Request,
CORA Request, FARA (1938) Request, (3) day Notice to Cease and Desist, et al.; and “The
Department” having never responded to Respondent until on or about July 18, 2023, with
Letter : L0296818192 saying: “Respondent’s Arguments have already been rejected by the
courts” and that: “they were going to proceed with their collections process!”; or

11) “The Department” is wrongly attempting to act under the Statute of Limitations on Colorado
Taxes is six (6) years from the latter of the date on which the tax was due, or the return was
filed. Since Respondent has a good faith belief, or a firmly held belief that Respondent is not
engaged in any taxable Activities under Title 44, or as transferred to Title 12 of the Colorado
Revised Statutes. Therefore, Respondent doesn’t believe he owes a State Tax and so all
Taxes paid have been under the auspices of “A GIFT”, given out of the generosity and
kindness of Respondent’s heart; and so again, CDOR is clearly out of its jurisdiction to even
attempt to Assess Respondent or the accounts of Respondent for the years 2016 or 2017. Not
to mention, if the failure to collect the tax was based on an error or omission from the
government, the statute of limitations is just two (2) years!!!; or

12) “The Department” knows that their Taxes, their penalties, their interest, MUST BE
ASSESSED WITHIN THREE (3) YEARS OF THEIR DUE DATE (See: Sec. 39-26-125,
C.R.S., ¶96-077); or

13) “The Department” knows well that the “Wage Garnishment sent to GCP” was unlawful and
that “The Department” has lost jurisdiction, the agents know the interest and penalties which
they are continuing to assess in the garnishment sent to GCP just a year ago, has absolutely
doubled under the fraudulent guise of pretending The 16 th Amendment gave Congress new
powers to Tax.; or

14) “The Department” is also arguing the 16th Amendment and the legality of it. The herein
Respondent objects and in lieu of strong armed fear tactics meant to deceive and extort The
People of The State of Colorado, The disheartening truth is that for literally generations,
government lawyers (foreign agents) have deceptively led the public to believe that the 16th
Amendment gave Congress new powers to tax by “permitting” a direct tax without
apportionment (as the Constitution requires) on ALL incomes. The words of the Amendment
appear to support this claim:      

“The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever
source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to
any census or enumeration.” [16th Amendment to the Constitution]; or

15) “The Department” and soulless government lawyers cite several beginning sections, for
example, of the United States Code (26 USC §§ 1,61,62,63, and 6012) to show that the law
is consistent with the 16th Amendment. As a sad result, everyone wrongfully assumes that
income is the subject of the tax and fills out tax returns or gets an Accountant to do this
for them.; or

6
 16) “The Department” is well aware of the problem is that this is not true.    To evidence this,
let me help the records to recall “ancient documents” (i.e.) “Treasury Decision 2303” for
clarifications from all the way back in 1916, when the Secretary of the Treasury and the
Supreme Court (Stanton v. Baltic Mining and Brushaber v. Union Pacific) stated that the
16TH Amendment did not give Congress new powers to tax and that the income tax is
an indirect “excise” tax which never required “apportionment.” ; or 

17) “The Department” is well aware that the controlling tax which the courts have issued
ruling opines on, have ruled as follows:

“The provisions of the sixteenth amendment conferred no new power of taxation, but

simply prohibited [Congress’ original power to tax incomes] from being taken out of
the category of indirect taxation, to which it inherently belonged, and being placed in
the category of direct taxation subject to apportionment.”   [Treasury Decision 2303,
1916]; or

18) Understanding that the income tax is not a direct tax (as the government legal representatives,
CDOR Representatives, the CDOR Executive Director, ET AL., deceptively claim) is
HUGELY important here. Because it dramatically changes what the reader has to look for in
the law.    In order to know what to look for, one must understand what an excise tax is, to
wit:   

“Indirect” [excise] taxes are taxes imposed upon the “importation, consumption,

manufacture, and sale of certain commodities, privileges, particular
business transactions, vocations, occupations, and the like” [ Flint v. Stone Tracy, 220
U.S. 107 (1911)].

19) ¶61-520, Statute of Limitations. Taxes, penalties, or interest must be assessed within
three years of their due date. ( Sec. 39-26-125, C.R.S., ¶96-077; Sec. 39-26-210, C.R.S.,
¶96-118) The three-year statute of limitations also applies to the filing of lien notices,
issuance of distraint warrants, and commencement of collection suits. No lien may continue
beyond the three-year limitation period except for taxes assessed and notices of lien filed
before the expiration of such period; in such cases, the lien will continue only for one year
after the filing of the notice. However, taxes, penalties, and interest, may be assessed, or
proceedings for the collection of such amounts may be begun, at any time when a fraudulent
return is filed with the intent to evade tax. A taxpayer and the Executive Director of the
Department of Revenue may agree in writing to extend the limitation period, and the extended
period may be extended again by subsequent agreements in writing.; or

Wherefore, with all due respect, exactly which arguments of Respondent have already
been rejected by the courts, as I have, thus far, been unable to locate any such rejections
by the courts, or otherwise. I was also unable to find any legal means by which CDOR,
nor the Executive Director may issue a lien, levy, garnishment, or otherwise if not done
prior to the three (3) year Statute of Limitations, which of course, CDOR failed to timely
and to lawfully accomplish.

With that being said, the Executive Director most certainly will CEASE and DESIST, or
the same said Executive Director, along with all those aiding and abetting, counseling

7
and commanding the said Executive Director shall be terminated, arrested, prosecuted,
sentenced and imprisoned for their illegal acts of fraud, deception, theft and other illegal
and unlawful acts committed by the same, absent lawfully delegated Departmental
authority to act.
Now then, with that having been said, let this serve as their NOTICE to CEASE &
DESIST any and all such said unlawful collections from Respondent and to RETURN all
funds which have been unlawfully taken from Respondent, under “Threat, Duress and
Coercion”.

Dated this 28TH Day of August, 2023

Thank you for your time and your lawful cooperation.

Respectfully Submitted,

By: _______________________
/s/ James Hardin

PS. Please make this communication a permanent part of my CDOR records kept under
Respondent’s Account #: 95038396.

8
 INDEX
COLORADO STATE INCOME TAXES
C.R.S. TITLE 44 and as transferred to TITLE 12, if one owes
A STATE INCOME TAX, then their TRADE OR PROFESSION will be
listed under Title 44, or Title 12, Article 20 –
DIVISION OF PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS ………………………………… Pg. 11.

FEDERAL INCOME TAXES

26 USC Subtitle A: Income Taxes and it states
Chapter 1 – Normal Taxes and Surtaxes, then under “subchapter N.”, it states:
“Subchapter. N. Tax based on income from sources within
Sec. 861 or without Sec. 862 in the
United States Code (See: Sec. 861” …….……………………………………….. Pg. 15.

THE REAL SHOCKER

The Constitution does not give Congress the ability to regulate 
intrastate commerce (NOT after King George!) ..………...…..………………………… Pg. 22.

INFLATION ON FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES

How Inflation has caused the Devaluation of the U.S. FRN’s and
Until becoming “Worthless Securities” ………………........................................................ Pg. 26.

HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
OF THE WORLD RESERVE CURRENCY & the Tax
Liabilities of the World Reserve Currency ………..…….………………………………… Pg. 33.

GERMANY ALL OVER AGAIN ………………………………………………. Pg. 40.

HOW DID WE GET HERE? …………………………………………………… Pg. 79.

THE “HOLY WAR”

How Congressional Investigations show an
ongoing conspiracy by Britain ……………………………………………………………. Pg. 94.

DECLARATION OF SEPARATE & EQUAL STATION

See inside ………………….……………………………………………………………… Pg. 114.

American Peace Flag

Where is our Title 4, Sec.1 flags and why are they not in
our civil courts, or in our public schools, or in our local banks,
or in our Public Libraries, or in our state & federal public buildings …………………… Pg. 120.

FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT COMPLAINT

AGAINST DEFENDANT FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK;
DEFENDANT FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD OF GOVERNORS; &
DEFENDANTS PRIMARY DEALER …………………………………………………. Pg. 137.

MODEL FEDERAL RESERVE BANK FREE CITY ORDINANCE.

9
Model legislation to enact immediate protection ……………………………………… Pg. 144.

THE MAN FROM THE SEA ……………………………………………………. Pg. 150.

10
 COLORADO STATE INCOME TAXES
This is a task which been undertaken, but not just for Respondent’s own
protection, but this is done on behalf of The People of The State of Colorado; and it must
be done and Respondent will not rest until DORA’s Certification has been withdrawn and
the absolute corruption within it, will be scattered to the WIND! The herein Respondent
vows to FINISH, ONCE AND FOR ALL TIME, that absolute corruption whom, by
strong arm collection tactics, attempted to plunder the herein Respondent, who mean to
do ALL NECESSARY, to prevent such said travesties from ever happening to the
Respondents fellow brother(s) and sister(s) of THE STATE OF COLORADO.

The herein Respondent absolutely VOWS to Dismantle the entire plethora of EVILS
under the umbrella of “DORA”, whom the herein Respondent has discovered the same to
be absolutely corrupted; and the same have gravely errored when they attempted to run
ram shod over the one whom god has chosen to be the voice of his people (huge mistake
& grave error on the parts of the CDOR, et al; and Dora, (parent agency) grievously
errored, when they allowed the fake and fictitious State Tax allegations, when wrongly
further attempting an armed robbery of the herein Respondent for State Taxes, absent
being engaged in any state regulated taxable activities! Furthermore, that alleged green
light, to murder, along with robbery and further acts of terrorism doesn’t sit well at all
with The People of Colorado!

That was a Big mistake… huge! The actions of those foreign agents and representatives,
who will soon realize the high cost of their actions and wrongs! Let me say that again, its
going to cost them and cost them BIG TIME.

In fact, it will cost them to the extent that they will have all the time in the world to
reflect upon their acts and omission’s [See: FARA (1938)] and the same will most

11
certainly regret the day they targeted God’s Chosen witness and mouth piece (See: Isaiah
40-49).

The perpetrator’s will most certainly regret the day, in which they wrongly accused
God’s Chosen Witness to target, persecute, or to attempt to prosecute! there is clearly
mail fraud, along with targeted extortion, amongst other high crimes and misdemeanor(s)
evidencing the unlawful, “willful and wanton” conduct and/or:

“(7) conscious and intentional disregard of and indifference to the rights and safety of
others, which the defendant knows or should have known is reasonably likely to result in
injury, damage, or other harm.”

God says that what they try to do to this Witness, God will do to them in the same
manner. For all the reasons shown herein, the Colorado voters have limited the ability of
government to impose taxes without The People’s consent [Article X section 20], and
The People have also therefore limited the terms of state officials [Article XVIII section
11].

By the important power to initiate constitutional amendments, the voters of Colorado

have been able to successfully rein in government.
Yet, Departmental Personnel have grievously errored and the records will list a
multiplicity of occasions when the same personnel descended down into the low plane of
the decision and like lightning descending down from Heaven to the earth, in the same
manner shall the same personnel fall from like lightning falls down to the depths below.
Moreover, how can any County be unincorporated, when its judicial arm is located
within an Incorporated County, City, Town, or for that matter, any State under
the
HOME RULE? None hold sovereignty, in their Corporate bodies and operating
in
Municipal capacities, as clearly stated above.
Yet this whole HOME RULE thing is something, which I was never
taught in the
mandatory Constitutional government sanctioned public school curriculum. That
is
because this HOME RULE Charter stuff was not taught along with the history, nor
classes on our Constitutional government.
The evidence, which Claimant has found makes it really clear that: “The State of
Colorado” knows all to well the level of Municipal violations on a daily basis. This
willful and wanton disregard of basic ethical expectations, perceptions and norms of the

12
People, is evidenced right in the Heart of Colorado Ethics.
Claimant say’s the heart, because it is the life sustaining source of the State of Colorado,
(i.e.) the Colorado Constitution, Article XXIX Ethics in Government, whereby
explaining the intent in Section 1., which states in part:
“Section 1. Purposes and findings.
(1) The people of the state of Colorado hereby find and declare that:
(a) The conduct of public officers, members of the general assembly, local
government officials, and government employees must hold the respect and
confidence of the people;
(b) They shall carry out their duties for the benefit of the people of the state;
(c) They shall, therefore, avoid conduct that is in violation of their public trust
or that creates a justifiable impression among members of the public that such
trust is being violated;”
The Colorado Constitution, Article XXIX Ethics in Government, explaining the intent
in Section 1., which states in part:

“Section 1. Purposes and findings.

(1) The people of the state of Colorado hereby find and declare that:
(a) The conduct of public officers, members of the general assembly, local government officials,
and government employees must hold the respect and confidence of the people;
(b) They shall carry out their duties for the benefit of the people of the state;
(c) They shall, therefore, avoid conduct that is in violation of their public trust or that creates a
justifiable impression among members of the public that such trust is being violated;”

God has made up the mind Divine, and the judgment of God will befall all for their
unsubstantiated Frauds upon The People of The State of Colorado and to do so, wholly
and completely, for it is the “WILL OF THE PEOPLE” and their voices (Vox Populi)
are more often expressed by two parties, 1) their legislators; and/or 2) their private
attorney general, the peoples Councilor. Wherefore, let US define a few things and
clarify these matters for the record, to wit:

“In broadcasting, vox populi (/ˈvɒks ˈpɒpjuːlɪ/ VOKS POP-ew-li) is an interview with members

of the public. Vox populi is a Latin phrase that literally means voice of the people.[1]
(Also See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vox_populi ) and see further: 30 Seconds To Mars –
“Vox Populi” (lyrics) https://youtu.be/C0Loco6IVIE and "This is War" (lyrics)
https://youtu.be/hMAVLXk9QWA; https://youtu.be/BMOcXu-JheA

and...

“Private attorney general is an informal term usually used today in the United States to refer to a
private attorney who brings a lawsuit considered to be in the public interest, i.e., benefiting the
general public and not just the plaintiff, on behalf of a citizen or group of citizens. [1] The attorney
is considered a "private attorney general" and may, at the equitable discretion of the court, be
entitled to recover attorney's fees if he or she prevails. The rationale behind this principle is to

13
 provide extra incentive to private attorneys to pursue suits that may be of benefit to society at
large. (See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_attorney_general )

Notice of Respondent’s objection(s) to the State Government’s failure to even mention

the fact that The People of Colorado should reference the COLORADO REVISED
STATUTES Title 12, which is very clear regarding who is licensed in a Taxable
Activity under the State’s Income Tax laws? This is clarified as follows:
Title 12, Article 20 - DIVISION OF PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS

·       Browse as List
·       Search Within
________________________________________________________________

·       Article 100 - ACCOUNTANTS (§§ 12-100-101 — 12-100-130)

·       Article 105 - BARBERS AND COSMETOLOGISTS (§§ 12-105-101 — 12-105-126)

·       Article 110 - COMBATIVE SPORTS (§§ 12-110-101 — 12-110-116)

·       Article 115 - ELECTRICIANS (§§ 12-115-101 — 12-115-124)

·       Article 120 - ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, AND ARCHITECTS (§§ 12-120-101 — 12-120-417)

·       Article 125 - [Repealed] (§ 12-125-101)

·       Article 130 - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS (§§ 12-130-101 — 12-130-119)

·       Article 135 - MORTUARIES AND CREMATORIES (§§ 12-135-101 — 12-135-406)

·       Article 140 - NONTRANSPLANT TISSUE BANKS (§§ 12-140-101 — 12-140-108)

·       Article 145 - OUTFITTERS AND GUIDES (§§ 12-145-101 — 12-145-118)

·       Article 150 - PASSENGER TRAMWAYS (§§ 12-150-101 — 12-150-120)

·       Article 155 - PLUMBERS (§§ 12-155-101 — 12-155-124)

·       Article 160 - [Repealed] (§ 12-160-101)

·       Article 165 - RADON PROFESSIONALS (§§ 12-165-101 — 12-165-113) 

As anyone can clearly see for themselves, upon a small amount of effort and some good
old fashion research, one can come to the realization regarding, rather they “DO”, or “DO
NOT”, owe State Income Taxes. If what you do for a living is not listed here then you
don’t owe State Income Tax. So the State attempts to ignore the State laws, and simply
tries to piggy-back the Federal Income Tax.

14
The States such as Colorado, the Emerging Trends of The Federal Government as
evidenced in the following, under the Title: “Narrative: Emerging Trends”, and then
under “Tax Policy”:

“Changes to federal tax policy will have a direct impact on Colorado tax policy and could
result in a change to revenue collected here in Colorado.” (See: http://cdor.colorado.gov )

It is further worthy of note here, of how deceptive government Lawyer(s)/tax

attorney(s) are! Note, when one goes to the above cited section 6012 of the Internal
Revenue Code (I.R.C.), you see it is applicable to:

“Persons required to make, or file returns of income”!

Now, if this tax was simply applicable to everybody, then why speak so vaguely, in generalities, rather than
speaking with specificity? Although it does help one to better see, or to more easily recognize the unlawful
intent of absolutely corrupted agents of the multiple Departments falling under the powers and authorities
existing under the Departmental umbrella of DORA and whom regularly practice acts and unethical,
untimely, unlawful attacks by unethical and absolutely corrupted CDOR agents/personnel, et al.; and
because

“Fraud lurks in generalities.” (See: Trayner's Maxims 162)

Attachments:
1) 2016 Tax Levy Documents that where sent to GCP:
https://acrobat.adobe.com/link/review?uri=urn:aaid:scds:US:efcee064-a730-4d5a-bf98-4e3db680cab3

2) 2017 Tax Letter received on 11/29/2022:

https://photos.app.goo.gl/LidfFE61WdU2htKb7

3) This SAMPLE document shows how a Department of Revenue communication

should look and what all they should include.  Such as the top right
shows five (5) items in bold, not only three (3) and not only two
(2), but shall be five (5) if it is really and legitimately from the
Colorado Department of Revenue.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/RWjnSoZKyjS2srwv9

THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX IS AN

UNCONSTITUTIONAL EXCISE TAX

15
 Now, there is admittedly much confusion surrounding the so called “Income Tax”, the 16TH
Amendment and Congresses Taxing Powers & Authorities! Much of that confusion, as described
herein, are directly as a result of what is and what is not tax law.

A few of those examples are found in association with “Title 26 U.S.C.”, or “26 I.R.C.”, or the “16th
Amendment”, or the “one’s State Tax” and the like. The written law is and must remain Constitutional,
meaning that the law must reflect the Constitutional limits upon Congress’ power to tax and the IRS’ or
The State(s) Constitutional Limits on their authority to lawfully Collect Taxes.  

Now, if one goes to 26 USC Subtitle A: Income Taxes and it states under Chapter 1 – Normal Taxes
and Surtaxes, then under subchapter N., it states:

“Subchapter. N. Tax based on income from sources within or without the United States Sec.
861”

Now, don’t you think that folks should know what Domestic taxable activities in the Code makes them
liable to pay income taxes first? Now, unlike the reference which government attorneys used to
deceptively make everybody think they have to file State and Federal Tax Returns (W-2’s and 1099’s), or
any others.  

Again, we see that unethical Government lawyers and politicians (being traitorous and in seditious
association) are desperately trying to keep the public from finding out about Subchapter N, Section 861,
which is exactly why The States Government lawyers deceptively attempt to lead everybody to the wrong
places, such as section 6012 of the Internal Revenue Codes choices of exemptions, or to write your
selections down, like Subchapter N, Section 861.  So much so, that they have recently attempted to hide
ALL with the latest recent changes to Federal Income Tax Return Forms, for the purposes of unlawfully
making ALL, taxable, when in reality, most Americans otherwise would not lawfully be liable for the
Federal Income Tax; and therefore, would not be liable for the State Income Tax.

Therefore, The People are EXEMPT because they are NOT engaged in any Taxable Activity pursuant to
Subchapter N, Section 861.  So, why are the local State and Federal Government(s) waging economic
warfare, upon their own people and committing fraud, extortion, deceptive trade practices and many other
unethical acts, by sending Coloradans to places like section 6012 of the internal revenue code !

It is an organized RICO criminal theft, using fraud, deception, extortion that is committed upon the whole
Civil Society, injurious to The People!  SHAME ON THEM! SHAME ON US FOR ALLOWING THIS
TO CONTINUE!

16
Besides that, why would The State Department Of Revenue be attempting to coerce me into becoming a
witness against myself in violation of my Rights and Guarantees under the “BILL OF RIGHTS” in the
Colorado Constitution? Why would they be claiming that the:

“Department of Revenue records show that certain income was paid to you during the year
indicated above. The income may have been reported by employers or by the IRS, which is
authorized by Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code. The Income is reported as
follows:

“2017 Colorado Income Tax Case 1739785

”Income Description Amount
1099-G Unemployment $573.00
W2 Wages $34, 279.24

TOTAL INCOME $34,852.24

Again, why are they misrepresenting the facts? Moreover, if “employers, or the IRS, which they claim to be
authorized by Section 6103(d) of the Internal Revenue Code”, then why are Department of Revenue
Agents attempting to frame me and/or entrap me, by being so vague a language, then demanding “Copies
of all W-2’s”, in legally prohibited activities according to controlling law, (i.e.) The Colorado
Constitution, in violation of “THE BILL OF RIGHTS” in the Colorado Constitution? But those are
Federal Documents, not State documents which THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE is demanding!!! If
The Department is authorized as they say, then don’t hide it, send me copies showing who the sent it? SO
WE CAN MOVE ON!
But don’t send me mail PRESORTED FIRSTCLASS MAIL U.S. POSTAGE PAID DENVER,
COLORADO. Yet has no postal stamps, nor meter stamps on the envelope, but I received it 11/29/2022
before 11:00am through U.S. Mail and the letter inside the envelope is also dated Nov 29, 2022, which was
left in my mailbox.

That is suspicious and I just don’t see how that can happen unless there is a personal carrier in every single
case, or there is clearly mail fraud, along with targeted extortion, amongst other high crimes and
misdemeanor(s) evidencing the unlawful, “willful and wanton” conduct and/or:

“(7) conscious and intentional disregard of and indifference to the rights and safety of
others, which the defendant knows or should have known is reasonably likely to result in
injury, damage, or other harm.”

But they are intentionally vague, so as to better enable them to crown their frauds with success. Therefore,
proper disclosure by THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE is mandatory So that Respondent may prepare
whatever is necessary to promptly file whatever is required for a proper defense against an entity SO
MILITANT & SO DANGEROUSLY ROGUE, AS THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE HAS

17
BECOME! Among a whole plethora of other crimes, there is clearly mail fraud, along with targeted
extortion, amongst other high crimes and misdemeanor(s) evidencing the unlawful, “willful and wanton”
conduct and/or:

“(7)conscious and intentional disregard of and indifference to the rights and safety of others,
which the defendant knows or should have known is reasonably likely to result in injury,
damage, or other harm.”

That is to say, whatever is required to stop and/or prevent the same from making false and fraudulent
claims pertaining to The People of Colorado, including me and my family; and for the unlawful,
unauthorized disclosures, of a third parties personal identification numbers, and/or using another’s
personal identification numbers and without prior written authorization for such said wrongful disclosure(s)
of another person(s) personal identification numbers; and which constitutes an unlawful disclosure of the
same to an unknown third party.

We are not talking about the disclosures of their own numbers. But rather, an third party making
unauthorized disclosures of some other persons confidential SSN, for their private tax identity; and NO
THAT IS NOT WHAT I.R.C. Section 6103 AUTHORIZES. If fact it is clear on the IRS website what it
does and does not authorize, to wit:

“You are probably aware that the law protects your tax return information from disclosure
to other parties by the Internal Revenue Service. IRC Section 6103 generally prohibits the
release of tax information by an IRS employee. However, there are important exceptions
that you should be aware of.

IRC 6103(d) provides that return information may be shared with state agencies responsible
for tax administration. The state agency must request this information in writing, and the
request must be signed by an official designated to request tax information.” (See:
https://www.irs.gov/government-entities/federal-state-local-governments/disclosure-laws )

Then in the second paragraph, THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE deceptively states

as follows:

“A review of our records indicate that you did not file a 2017 Colorado I Income Tax Return. The
Department has authorization to file a return on your behalf per 39-22-602 C.R.S.”

The Department of Revenue again here are using “FRUIT OF THE POISONOUS TREE” trying to cite a
Colorado Revised Statute and then say the Statute says something that it clearly does not say. As shown
above, we can see what the Department claims; and now below we also clearly see what the citation
actually says, to wit:

18
 “1. If any person fails or refuses to make any return required by this article, the Executive
Director, Mark Ferrandinomay make such return for such person from such information as
may be available, and any assessment based on such return made by the Executive Director,
Mark Ferrandinoshall be as good and sufficient as if such return had been made and filed by
the person liable therefor.”

So, as we can all see, “The Department” does not have the authority as falsely claimed, to file a Return on
my behalf. In fact there is ONLY ONE person in the entire Department that actually has lawful authority
to file a Return for anybody.

The ONLY ONE is the “executive director” and not “The Department”, nor anyone else within said
Department! Furthermore, one can clearly see what THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE unethically
practices in BAD FAITH on a regular daily basis. Else their letter and fraudulent claims pertaining to 2017
would have used the clear and concise language in the Colorado Revised Statute (C.R.S.), in lieu of making
up their own much broader interpretation, giving the false impression that anybody in “THE
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE” are authorized to do such acts, which is clearly NOT TRUE.

The disheartening truth is that for literally generations, government lawyers (foreign agents) have
deceptively led the public to believe that the 16th Amendment gave Congress new powers to tax by
“permitting” a direct tax without apportionment (as the Constitution requires) on ALL incomes. The words
of the Amendment appear to support this claim:      

“The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source
derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or
enumeration.” [16th Amendment to the Constitution]

Government lawyers cite several beginning sections, for example, of the United States Code (26 USC §§
1,61,62,63, and 6012) to show that the law is consistent with the 16th Amendment. As a sad result,
everyone wrongfully assumes that income is the subject of the tax and fills out tax returns or gets an
Accountant to do this for them.  

The problem is that this is not true.    To evidence this, let me help the records to recall “ancient
documents” (i.e.) “Treasury Decision 2303” for clarifications from all the way back in 1916, when the
Secretary of the Treasury and the Supreme Court (Stanton v. Baltic Mining and Brushaber v. Union
Pacific) stated that the 16th Amendment did not give Congress new powers to tax and that the income
tax is an indirect “excise” tax which never required “apportionment.”  

“The provisions of the sixteenth amendment conferred no new power of taxation, but simply
prohibited [Congress’ original power to tax incomes] from being taken out of the category of
indirect taxation, to which it inherently belonged, and being placed in the category of direct
taxation subject to apportionment.”   [Treasury Decision 2303, 1916]

19
Understanding that the income tax is not a direct tax (as the government legal representatives deceptively
claims) is HUGELY important here, because it dramatically changes what the reader has to look for in the
law.    In order to know what to look for, one must understand what an excise tax is:   

“Indirect” [excise] taxes are taxes imposed upon the “importation, consumption,

manufacture, and sale of certain commodities, privileges, particular business transactions,
vocations, occupations, and the like” [ Flint v. Stone Tracy, 220 U.S. 107 (1911)].

To give The People a better understanding of how much of the entire U.S. Population was actually subject
to taxation during this same timeframe, I’ll cite a historic account on this subject pertaining to those years
(2016 & 2017), as follows:

“By 1917, largely due to the new income tax rate, the annual federal budget was
almost equal to the total budget for all the years between 1791 and 1916 . Still
more was required, however, and in October 1917 Congress passed The War Revenue
Act of 1917 , lowering the number of exemptions and greatly increasing tax rates.
Under the 1917 act, a taxpayer with an income of only $40,000 was subject to a 16%
tax rate, while one who earned $1.5 million faced a rate of 67%. While only five
percent of the U.S. population was required to pay taxes , U.S. tax revenue
increased from $809 million in 1917 to a whopping $3.6 billion the following year.
By the time World War I ended in 1918, income tax revenue had funded a full one-
third of the cost of the war effort [colored emphasis are mine] .” (See:
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/war-revenue-act-passed-in-u-s )

WOW! That sounds much closer to what is being said by the Respondent today (106 years later), when
saying: “Most Americans are not liable for State, or Federal Income Taxes, when they were born
here in one of the several States, and their work and their pay only consist of Domestic means and
Domestic Income, but not foreign income from foreign corporations, or corporations whose business
includes those businesses operating or whose operations involve international commerce”

In the Congressional Record from March 27, 1943 (page 2580); a former regulation writing lawyer for the
Treasury Department explained it the best, so far:

“The income tax is, therefore, not a tax on income as such.   It is an excise tax with respect
to certain activities and privileges which is measured by reference to the income which they
produce. The income is not the subject of the tax: it is the basis for determining the amount of
the tax.”

So, unlike a direct tax, there are two parts to this excise tax:
 
 First, there is the subject of the tax which is the taxable activity (type of commerce) that
generates the income.
 Second, there is the measure of the tax (kind of income) that is generated.  

20
So in order for income to be taxable, it must be derived from a type of commerce that is taxable by
Congress.  So where are the taxable types of commerce found; that is, the subjects of this income excise
tax?

They are not found in the sections of the law quoted by government lawyers continuously (26 USC §§
1,61,62,63, and 6012).  But rather, they are found thousands of pages away in a previously overlooked,
ignored, or misunderstood section of the law, 26 USC § 861 or more specifically (Subchapter N, Section
861).   

It is in Section 861 that both the “items” (kinds) of income and the taxable types of commerce are found
from which income must be derived in order to be taxable.   The “items” of income are also found in 26
USC § 61 (as most Certified Public Accountants know), but there is nothing in these first parts of the law
about the subjects of this excise tax.
 
While the government ignores Subchapter N, Section 861, the indexes of the USC (United States Code)
and CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) say otherwise. Whether the reader looks up “gross income” OR
“deductions” OR “taxable income,” they ALL LEAD TO SECTION 861 regarding domestic income
(and Section 862 regarding foreign income).  

In the USC, USCA, and USCS versions of the IRC under the category of “Income Taxes,” those
references are:

Income
From sources within U.S., 26  § 861

Gross income,
Sources within U.S., 26 § 861
Sources without U.S., 26 § 862

Taxable income,
Deductions, Taxable income from within U.S., see: 861
Sources within U.S., 26 §  861; Sources without U.S., 26 § 862

Similarly, in the Index of the CFR under “Income taxes,” there is only ONE entry that reads “Income
from sources inside or outside U.S., determination of sources of income, 26 CFR 1 (1.861-1–1.864-8T).”   
When seen together, the titles of the law make it obvious that Subchapter N, Section 861 is critical to
determining taxable domestic income:
  
“Subtitle A, “Income taxes”
Chapter 1, “Normal taxes and surtaxes”
Subchapter N, “Tax based on income from sources within or without the United States”

21
 Part I, “Determination of sources of income”
Section 861, “Income from sources within the United States”
861(a) “Gross income from sources within United States”
861(b) “Taxable income from sources within United States”

Section 861 is the place to go for everybody with domestic income to determine their taxable income.   But
because of the 16TH Amendment deception, and the seditious government attorneys (members of the bar.
whose actions are not only Traitorous, but are also Treasonous; and as for the said Members of The
Bar… They are Foreign Agents, Representing a Foreign Corporation, Foreign Organization, or Foreign
Association. As such, they are merely Unregistered Foreign Agents of a Foreign Power; and for this reason,
if no other, should be arrested, Charged, Tried, Sentenced and Imprisoned for TREASON AGAINST THE
CONSTITUTION AND TREASON AGAINST OUR FREE AMERICAN FLAG OF PEACE!!!

We know that our decision to do so is the right decision, NOBODY knows to go there, which is a
massive theft upon the whole of Civil Society, including, but not limited to RICO Conspiracy against We,
The People of the United States of America; and as against The People of The State of Colorado.  
 

22
 THE REAL SHOCKER
The real shocker is buried deep in the deliberately convoluted but correctly written
regulations under Section 861.   Because the public was deceived about the 16th
Amendment, readers did not know to look there for the taxable types of commerce.
Check this with your Accountant, CPA and Tax professional(s).

But when they go there, they find that the subjects of this income (excise tax) are all
related to international or possessions commerce.  Income from domestic commerce
received by residents living and working in the United States IS NOT shown to be
taxable.   In other words, the law itself proves that Americans with
only domestic income (most incomes) do not owe federal income taxes.  

For this reason, almost every single man and woman who were born in one of the several
States are EXEMPT from both, State and Federal Income Taxes. Not because their State
and Federal Tax Codes say they are exempt, but because their Income Tax Laws, Codes
and the like are not applicable to those who were born here Domestically; and who only
work here Domestically; and who don’t partake in foreign banking and investment
schemes, such as retirement, or pension funds, with offshore investment banking and the
like international commerce.

So Why did the law have to be written this way?   More especially, when the
Constitution gives Congress the ability to impose a broad income tax ONLY over
commerce it was given the ability to regulate.    

For clarification purposes, The Constitution does not give Congress the ability to
regulate intrastate commerce (NOT after King George! Does this come as a surprise?).
That power is reserved to “the states” but ask your Accountant for confirmation.

Therefore, the conclusion is irrefutable; Congress does not have the ability to impose a

broad income tax on all commerce, and the law shows us all exactly that!    [Domestic

23
income received by foreigners is taxable ONLY because it is part of international
commerce].  

When a careful review of over 80 years of prior law is made, by one with a Doctorate of
Jurisprudence from a London based Institution of Higher Learning, it is clear that the
type of income taxation that everyone “thinks” exists is always missing from the law. 
SO HOW HAS ALMOST THE ENTIRE POPULATION ON THE NORTH
AMERICAN CONTININANT STILL REMAIN CONFUSSED AND NOT CLEAR
ON THESE MATTERS?

I’ll tell you why and how it was successful for so long! Because prior to the Internet and
“search” engines, the government was able to HIDE the truth deeper and deeper in the
huge sea of words making up the law; and we know it is by design because decades ago
one IRS commissioner upon being asked how they enforce a tax upon people when it is
based upon “Voluntary compliance and Self-Assessment?”

The commissioner responded: “By scaring the hell out of them.”  

That response from such a Taxing Authority, evidences the fact that they know better, but
due to government greed, have willfully chosen to commit a criminal premeditated theft
upon an entire society! However, it has been in the law the entire time, but the reader had
to know what to look for and where to look. They also know how hard that is to do when
it is being hidden from US and they continually “ADVISE, OR DIRECT US TO THE
WRONG PLACES, SO AS TO CROWN THEIR FRAUDS AND EXTORTIONS WITH
SUCCESS!!!”  ASK YOUR ACCOUNTANT TO CONFIRM THE IMPORTANCE
OF Section 861.

Although “The tax imposed is upon taxable income” is in the first part of the law
(Subchapter A); and it is not until 6000 pages later in the 9th Volume of the
regulations (Subchapter N) that Section 861 shows the truth that most Americans do
not owe federal income taxes, which also evidences the deceptive intensions of

24
government lawyers when writing 6,000 pages of Tax Law before revealing the
TRUTH! Then, where ones State Income Tax obligations are directly tied to, or
premised upon ones Federal Income Tax obligation, such as in Colorado, if one owes NO
Federal Income Tax, they also owe NO State Income Tax, as shown and cited herein.
 
The critical importance of the Section 861 Regulations is easy to verify with search
engines (that is, to see at a glance without reading every word) which again, is why you
should also check this with your accountant(s).   This is where all the details are found
about how to determine taxable income which you can confirm in discussion with your
Accountant (CPA) regarding the subject files shown below, to wit:

 “specific guidance” for applying the Code (1 file)

 the “specific sources” of taxable income (1 file)
 “the sources of income for purposes of the income tax” (1 file)
 the specific taxable items – “Income that is not…exempt” (1 file)
 the definition of exempt income – “exempt, excluded, or eliminated” (2 files … both 861)
 the rules for “eliminated income” (2 files, both under Sec. 861)
 rules regarding “excluded income” in the “computation of taxable income” (2 files … both 861)
 “how to determine taxable income” (1 file), which also includes the only occurrence of…
 “how to determine tax” (1 file)
[Many more similar terms occur only within “the rules [of Sec. 861]”]

You can see for yourself using the government’s own websites: https://uscode.house.gov/
and https://www.ecfr.gov or by consulting your own Accountant.

I believe the most important Regulation of all, to speak to your accountant(s) about,
is 1.861-8.  “The tax imposed is upon taxable income.” On the left-hand side, choose
“Simple Search.”  Put in: Title 26 (Income Tax) and then type in, “how to determine
taxable income.”  What do you find?  You find:

 1.861-8U Computation of taxable income from sources within the United States and from other
sources and activities.

There is only ONE Regulation in Section 861 that tells the reader how
to compute  taxable income derived from domestic commerce; this occurs only when
foreigners receive such income. The purely educational information in this First
Amendment protected letter shows how Treasury Department lawyers deliberately

25
changed the law over the years to make the truth harder and harder to find, robbing most
Americans in the process. (Does your accountant have “errors and omission’s insurance,
if one continues trying to create Tax Obligations which don’t actually exist, after you
have asked them about and provided them with links to Section 861 ?)

The public should both, 1) know about this section; and 2) should personally read the
exact wording of the Regulations under Subchapter N, Section 861 of the Internal
Revenue Code.
 
It is under 1.861-8 and 1.861-8T that the rules show when foreign income is taxable
and when domestic income is taxable.  As you will see for yourself, for individuals, only
income derived from international and possessions commerce is taxable.

Any Certified Public Accountant (CPA) will confirm that: If you have taxable income,
then you must pay income taxes whether you like it or not. But my question is what
happens when the State Licensed and Insured have advised in error, thereby
creating obligation(s) which did not then, nor do they now actually exist? Yet this
wrong, this damage and injury has been regularly practiced year after year after
year. The only question remaining is rather they did, or did not, have prior
knowledge and understanding of this when preparing your returns in the previous
years, or while preparing prior years Returns?

“The income tax is, therefore, not a tax on income as such.   It is an excise tax with respect
to certain activities and privileges which is measured by reference to the income which they
produce. The income is not the subject of the tax: it is the basis for determining the amount of
the tax.”

26
 INFLATION

ON FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES

(F.R.N.’s)

NOTICE: As previously stated herein, these document’s have been presented as a

direct result of CDOR’s unethical, highly deceptive, dishonest, immoral and their

27
wrongfully made claims. Claims, mind you, which have been unlawfully made
under false, fraudulent & pretended pretenses. The Department(s) operating under
the DORA Umbrella, have imposed upon The People of Colorado grievously
burdensome obligations.

These unlawfully placed burdens to be shouldered by Coloradan’s, and yet

Coloradan’s have never brought forth this in the form of a ballot, nor have
Coloradan’s ever voted for the same. Wherefore, Respondent, ET AL.; have
painfully suffered being seditiously subjected over to foreign jurisdiction’s, foreign
powers, foreign authorities, foreign Corporations, foreign Organizations, foreign
Associations and their many foreign Agents and the foreign underlings.

As such, over time, there came to be certain Departmental Personnel

whom became traitorous and committing seditious acts of both overthrow and Acts
of Surrender (Capitulation) having been committed, became more and more
obvious. It was equally obvious that certain huge corrections must take place and
the corrections must begin much sooner than later.

The longer it has been allowed, the higher levels of hedonism and wonton disregard
for the Rights, Lives, Law(s), Safety and Happiness of The People of Colorado were
realized. The said violations against the Peace and Dignity, against the Rights and
the Will of The People of Colorado are being realized. The Constitutional
Violations having been recognized, that duty and obligation in the Bill of Rights is
herein answered, and The People of Colorado have called upon the God of Heaven
to witness the parties and their actions during these proceedings and if any swear
falsely during the same suffer death as punishment. as follows:

“Article II, Bill of Rights

Bill of Rights
In order to assert our rights, acknowledge our duties, and proclaim the principles upon
which our government is founded, we declare: 
Section 1. Vestment of political power. All political power is vested in and derived from the
people; all government, of right, originates from the people, is founded upon their will only,
and is instituted solely for the good of the whole.

Section 2. People may alter or abolish form of government � proviso . The people of this state
have the sole and exclusive right of governing themselves, as a free, sovereign and
independent state; and to alter and abolish their constitution and form of government
whenever they may deem it necessary to their safety and happiness, provided, such change
be not repugnant to the constitution of the United States. 

At the National Constitution Center, you will find rare copies of the Declaration of
Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. These are the three most important
documents in American history. But why are they important, and what are their
similarities and differences? And how did each document, in turn, influence the next in
America’s ongoing quest for liberty and equality?
There are some clear similarities among the three documents. All have preambles. All
were drafted by people of similar backgrounds, generally educated white men of

28
property. The Declaration and Constitution were drafted by a congress and a convention
that met in the Pennsylvania State House in Philadelphia (now known as Independence
Hall) in 1776 and 1787 respectively. The Bill of Rights was proposed by the Congress
that met in Federal Hall in New York City in 1789. Thomas Jefferson was the principal
drafter of the Declaration and James Madison of the Bill of Rights; Madison, along with
Gouverneur Morris and James Wilson, was also one of the principal architects of the
Constitution.

Most importantly, the Declaration, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights are based on
the idea that all people have certain fundamental rights that governments are created to
protect. Those rights include common law rights, which come from British sources like
the Magna Carta, or natural rights, which, the Founders believed, came from God. The
Founders believed that natural rights are inherent in all people by virtue of their being
human and that certain of these rights are unalienable, meaning they cannot be
surrendered to government under any circumstances.

At the same time, the Declaration, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights are different
kinds of documents with different purposes. The Declaration was designed to justify
breaking away from a government; the Constitution and Bill of Rights were designed to
establish a government. The Declaration stands on its own—it has never been amended—
while the Constitution has been amended 27 times. (The first ten amendments are called
the Bill of Rights.) The Declaration and Bill of Rights set limitations on government; the
Constitution was designed both to create an energetic government and also to constrain it.

The Declaration and Bill of Rights reflect a fear of an overly centralized government
imposing its will on the people of the states; the Constitution was designed to empower
the central government to preserve the blessings of liberty for “We the People of the
United States.” In this sense, the Declaration and Bill of Rights, on the one hand, and the
Constitution, on the other, are mirror images of each other.

The Declaration of Independence has three parts. It has a preamble, which later became
the most famous part of the document but at the time was largely ignored. It has a second
part that lists the sins of the King of Great Britain, and it has a third part that declares
independence from Britain and that all political connections between the British Crown
and the “Free and Independent States” of America should be totally dissolved.

The preamble to the Declaration of Independence contains the entire theory of American
government in a single, inspiring passage:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are
endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life,
Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.—That to secure these rights, Governments are
instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,—That
whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the
People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on
such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to
effect their Safety and Happiness.”

29
I would like to bring something to everybody’s attention here, because it goes to the very
heart of what is Respondent is attempting to convey herein. Notice how we see:
“…That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the
Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government…”

Again, as we see in the Colorado Constitution, it was stated as follows:

“Section 2. People may alter or abolish form of government � proviso . The people of this state
have the sole and exclusive right of governing themselves, as a free, sovereign and
independent state; and to alter and abolish their constitution and form of government
whenever they may deem it necessary to their safety and happiness, provided, such change
be not repugnant to the constitution of the United States. 

So we can see from the above shown examples that the people, have it within their
powers and authorities to alter and abolish, even that law which clearly rest at the top of
the list of legal authorities, may be altered, or even abolished. But more importantly, for
the purposes of what is being shown here, let us all take notice of what is doesn’t say.

Notice, it never says that the Government, has, nor was it ever given the powers and
authorities to alter, or to abolish The People. It never authorizes government agents to
declare the principle Sovereign’s (The People), to be a terrorist, nor an Enemy, nor to
issue a “GREEN LIGHT” upon The People, whereby dispatching foreign powers,
Corporations, Organizations and Associations, which includes foreign mercenaries from
the U.N. being sent into the body of the several States for the purposes of attacking, We,
The People.

These attacks are further upon their Constitutional Powers & Authorities, Reservation(s)
and Guarantees, at all times, whensoever being to and for, The People of the Several
States individually, and in whom are “The States” or “The Stars” represented in both The
Law and The Law of the flag and that a white star(*) shall be “The Stars” /Angels; and
upon their UNITING, are also The People of The United States of America
(Collectively/Jointly). The respective State governments, which ; nor the lawful desires
and voices of thereof.

Furthermore, The People of The State of Colorado have reserved and hereby reassert the
Constitutional Rights & Powers of The People. This included the People’s superior status
as the “Principle Sovereign(s)”!

The same said Departmental Personnel, being absolutely Corrupted, have unlawfully and
maliciously attempted the wrongful collections of a debt which is not truly due or owing.
It is truly extortion and a theft under color of law; and under the false, fraudulent and
deceptive pretense of State Income Taxes. It is precisely this Conspiracy consisting of
two or more, which have, together and jointly collaborated and furthered the said crimes.

Furthermore, it is the harmful, damaging, injurious acts explained herein which have and
continue to be criminally taking place. CDOR continues to further and fraudulently

30
allege a false, past due and owing debt, by Respondent, James Hardin. A Respondent,
mind you, whom is “NOT REQUIRED” to even file, much less to pay.

It is further worthy of note here, that Title 44 and then as Transferred to Title 12 of the
Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S.) does not list Respondent’s work, nor title, as a Trade
or Business required to file and pay said State Income Taxes as a direct result of their
State License to do a thing which otherwise would be unlawful, or illegal.

Respondent, is a Carpenter by Trade, but having been in the Trade from his teens and
now at age 51, the herein Respondent is a Carpenter Foreman. Neither of which are a
taxable trade practice under Title 44, or Title 12 of the Colorado Revised Statutes
(C.R.S.).

Furthermore, it is State policy, that if one doesn’t owe Federal Income Taxes, then they
owe no State Income Taxes. Pursuant to IRC 861, Subsection N, the herein Respondent
has no Federal Income Tax liabilities, as his work and his pay are 100% DOMESTIC and
Respondent has no Foreign or internationally based income, nor offshore accounts, nor is
Respondent engaged in any International, or Foreign Intragovernmental Commerce,
whom are “REQUIRED TO FILE; and who are REQUIRED TO PAY.

Respondent, James Hardin does not believe this to have been by mistake, nor error, but
rather, began and is continuing by a pre-planned, pre-orchestrated, pre-meditated and
100% targeted attack, using Military PSYOPS and Economic Warfare upon The People
of Colorado, ex rel, Respondent, James Hardin for the fraudulent attempted extortion by
Government personnel whom have been completely corrupted within the Colorado
Department of State umbrella and collectively known as CDOR and now DORA. But the
tax claims come from the Colorado Department of Revenue (CDOR). The targeted
attacks and attempted theft of Respondent’s money, property and other things of value,
absent Delegated Authority to do so and yet attempted via the unauthorized and
fraudulent misuse of a State Seal, to illegally and fraudulently attempt to collect a debt,
or a tax which is not due, nor owing by the herein Respondent.

For this reason, the Respondent, James Hardin herein serves Notice of Subpoena Duces
Tecum of all citations, cases, documents or records which CDOR relied upon to come to
the conclusion that Respondent owes The State of Colorado, CDOR personnel, et al.,
throughout the time frames applicable to the false and fraudulent claims by CDOR; and
shall be provided for the record of these proceedings, including all personnel’s
Delegations of Authority, along with their Foreign Agent Registration Statements and
their Amendments are also considered: “CERTIFIED GOVERNEMENT
DOCUMENTS”, (The Best Evidence) for use in Summary Judgment Proceedings,
because they have already been certified, sworn to and signed (Passing the test) as a
matter of government Records; and the same have been herein demanded pursuant to
Subpoena Duces Tecum, to wit:

31
 “Subpoena duces tecum
A subpoena duces tecum is a type of subpoena that requires the witness to produce a
document or documents pertinent to a proceeding. From the Latin duces tecum, meaning
"you shall bring with you".
See, e.g., United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974). See Category: Courts and Procedure
It is Menacing, Criminal Extortion, a violation of Public Trust and the like criminal acts,
high crimes and misdemeanors, which are Respondent’s Counter Claims and Charges as
against CDOR, et al.; in part, or in whole, as presented herein, to wit:

“Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-3-206; and Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-3-207; and Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-3-208,
et al., as stated and documented herein…

The Respondent would pause here for a moment with regards to “The State of Colorado”,
along with the many Departments under the DORA umbrella. DORA is who holds the
“Certification” of their joint existences.

DORA is also responsible, along with DORA Investigators, attorneys, advisors, case
managers and the like Departmental Personnel, including all other contracted 3 rd party
underlings and perpetrator’s utilized by CDOR and DORA to obstruct and to deny the
herein Respondent’s a fare and Impartial, non-biased “State & Federal Protected Civil
Rights”; and including Respondent’s Civil Rights Proceedings. All said associated
personnel will answer for the torturous interference, obstruction and sabotage of
Respondent’s State and Federal Civil Rights Violations Cases. for allowing and
continued existences are now being Reconsidered and Audited. The actions of the
current Executive Director, Mark Ferrandino of CDOR has evidenced, even to the
willfully blind that the department has become completely ROGUE!

Respondent hereby request The Executive Director, Mark Ferrandino disclose where the
funds come from for legal, for litigation, cost of court, cost for legal counsel, legal
settlements caused by Department Personnel who suffer from delusions of grandeur, God
Syndrome, for acts committed by Departmental Personnel, absent a Delegation of
Authority (of the Delegated Power(s) & Authority(s) to Act, with Specificity), or don’t
ACT AT ALL!!! when no such allocations are currently in existence anywhere in the
yearly financial disclosures, as reported to the Governor, by The Department.
Respondent believes the Executive Director, Mark Ferrandino in collective concert with
other associated Departmental Personnel.

Moreover, rather the Executive Director, Mark Ferrandino has, or has not, been
knowingly, intentionally and criminally mis-appropriating, and/or diverting Departmental
Funds, which otherwise began as lawfully Allocated Departmental Funds; and which at
some point have been misappropriated and misallocated by and for the unallocated,
unlawful, unfunded, unauthorized Acts, Off The Books Operation’s, & Citizen
Assassination(s), Sabotage, PSYOPS and Economic Warfare; and their Criminal Acts,
Omission’s, Attacks, Grave Breaches, which are actually War Crimes, whose Tactics can
be found in Guerilla Warfare.

32
But here we are talking about Traitors, Acts of Treason, Acts considered Sedition; and for
utilizing foreign para-military mercenaries and hit men from the United Nations (U.N.),
in Acts which can only be explained as Targeted Attacks via “Economic Warfare”,
“PSYOPS Warfare”, “Targeted Poisonings”, “Electronic Warfare”, “Asphyxiating and/or
Poisonous Gases Warfare” “Executions by Lethal Injections”, “Staging Murders (187) as
Suicides”, self poisonings, self mutilation, Prescription Drug Over Doses, Illicit Drug
Overdoses and the like said Attacks” which constitute “State Sponsored Terrorism” and
the like, to wit:

“the injury complained of is attended by circumstances of fraud, malice, or willful and

wanton conduct; and

When one considers the Acts committed by one, there can be no confusion with regards
to rather the said acts were then and are now:

“willful and wanton conduct" means conduct purposefully committed which the actor must
have realized as dangerous, done heedlessly and recklessly, without regard to consequences,
or of the rights and safety of others, particularly the plaintiff.”;

Now let us define “RIGHT”, so as to make it clear what a right is and who possesses
Rights, to wit:
“Right. A well-founded claim. If people believe that humanity itself establishes or proves
certain claims, either upon fellow beings, or upon society or government, they call these
claims human rights; if they believe that these claims inhere in the very nature of man
himself, they called them inherent, inalienable rights;

and…
“Under basic rules of construction, statutory laws enacted by legislative bodies cannot
impair rights given under a constitution. 194 B.R. at 925.”
(See: In re Young, 235 B.R. 666 (Bankr.M.D.Fla., 1999))

WHEREFORE, AGAIN, IT IS NOT THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE (Sheep) to GO TO

WAR! But I AM STANDING BEFORE YOU AS THEIR SHEPHARD, DRAWING
THE LINE IN THE SAND AND SAYING BABYLON YOUR END HAS COME AND
SHALL STOP, NOR SHALL SHE BE KNOWN ANYMORE! FOR YOUR DAYS OF
PERSECUTION, OF SCATTERING MY PEOPLE, OF YOUR GOVERNMENT
WOLVES FEEDING ON THE SUBSTANCE (Life blood of the lambs) AND THE
DAYS OF YOUR BABYLONIAN WHORING HAVE REACHED THEIR END!
BEHOLD THAT APOINTED TIME FOR THE FALL OF THE GREAT
BABYLONIAN HARLOT HAS ARRIVED AND NOW ALL THE SHEEP SEE HER
NAKEDNESS AND SHAME, AND THE SHEEP NOW ALSO SEE THE SILENT
WEAPONS USED IN THE QUIET WARS AND WHICH HAS BEEN SHEARING
THEM FOR SO LONG, NOW LAYING AT HER FEET, NOW EXPOSED IN HER
NAKEDNESS, ALL THE SHEEP WILL SEE AND WILL KNOW SHE HAS BEEN
AT WAR WITH THEM AT ALL TIMES…

33
This is War: https://youtu.be/BMOcXu-JheA

HISTORICAL BACKGROUND REGARDING THE WORLD RESERVE

CURRENCY AND THE TAX LIABILITIES, IF ANY ON THE SAME

Today’s World Reserve Currency, is also, our National Currency here in the United
States of America. The purpose of this research is to bring certain enlightening factual
truths to light pertaining to this currency as a direct result of Inflation, Devaluation and
for purposes of Taxation.

Herein we shall discuss and prove how Inflation is a currencies death nail… At least as it
applies to the society using said high inflation ridden currency. As it applies to
economics, the laws of equity, usury, two party notes and the like, inflation is much like a
tapeworm, in that it eats away at your substance, until one disease or another, but directly
related back to the source. Whichever the outcome is derived, the ways and means
eventually successful in the primary goal, i.e. the destruction of the host!

In the 1969 Edition of the Army Civil Affairs Manual (FM41-10), it touches upon
this subject matter of “INFLATION”, with regards to two party notes as a societies
currency, along with “Emergency Military Transcripts (EMT’s)”. It speaks about
a point when a currency becomes over burdensome, as a result of inflation and
devaluation.

It further touches on the fact that once a paper currency devaluates by 100% of its
face value, rather due to inflation or otherwise, of which can no longer be allowed to
be used as a legal currency, because it has become over burdensome upon the
society which is forced to use it.

In a Complaint/Petition, filed in the U.S. Court of Claims, Docket No. 41-76, On

February 11, 1976, by 44 federal Judges, Atkins et al., vs. U.S... Atkins et al.,
complained that:

“As a result of inflation, the compensation of federal judges has been substantially
diminished each year since 1969, causing direct and continuing monetary harm to
plaintiffs… The real value of the dollar decreased by approximately 34.5 percent from
March 15, 1969 to October 1, 1975… As a result, plaintiffs have suffered an unconstitutional
deprivation of earnings”, and in the prayer for relief claimed “damages for the unconstitutional
violations enumerated above, measured as the diminution of earnings for the entire period since
March 9, 1969.”

These court cases were ongoing and continuing over the years and some of which
included the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; and others, to wit:

34
 “97-5093
JUDGE TERRY J. HATTER, JR., MARY MARTIN ARCENEAUX, on behalf of the late Judge
George Arceneaux, Jr., JUDGE PETER H. BEER, JUDGE DUDLEY H. BOWEN, JR.,
DOLORES LEE BURCIAGA, executrix of the estate of Chief Judge Juan G. Burciaga, JUDGE
A.J. MCNAMARA, JUDGE HARRY PREGERSON, JUDGE RAUL A. RAMIREZ, JUDGE
NORMAN C. ROETTGER, JR., CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS A. WISEMAN, JR., CHIEF JUDGE
TERENCE T. EVANS, JUDGE HENRY A. MENTZ, JR., CHIEF JUDGE WILBUR D. OWENS,
JR., JUDGE HENRY R. WILHOIT, JR., JUDGE HAROLD A. BAKER and CHIEF JUDGE
MICHAEL M. MIHM,
Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

Steven S. Rosenthal, Morrison & Foerster LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-
appellants. With him on the brief were W. Stephen Smith and Jonathan S. Gowdy. Of counsel on
the brief were Ellen E. Deason, Assistant Professor, University of Illinois, College of Law, of
Champaign, Illinois.
Jeanne E. Davidson, Assistant Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division,
Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With her on the brief
was David M. Cohen, Director. Of counsel on the brief were Mildred L. Seidman, Chief, Court of
Federal Claims Section, Tax Division, Department of Justice; and Luke Levasseur, Attorney,
Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, Department of Justice, of Washington, DC.
Appealed from: United States Court of Federal Claims Judge James T. Turner United States Court
of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

and…
“97-5093
JUDGE TERRY J. HATTER, JR., MARY MARTIN ARCENEAUX, on behalf of the late Judge
George Arceneaux, Jr., JUDGE PETER H. BEER, JUDGE DUDLEY H. BOWEN, JR.,
DOLORES LEE BURCIAGA, executrix of the estate of Chief Judge Juan G. Burciaga, JUDGE
A.J. MCNAMARA,
JUDGE HARRY PREGERSON, JUDGE RAUL A. RAMIREZ, JUDGE NORMAN C.
ROETTGER, JR., CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS A. WISEMAN, JR., CHIEF JUDGE TERENCE T.
EVANS, JUDGE HENRY A. MENTZ, JR., CHIEF JUDGE WILBURD. OWENS, JR., JUDGE
HENRY R. WILHOIT, JR., JUDGE HAROLD A. BAKERand CHIEF JUDGE MICHAEL M.
MIHM,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES,
Defendant-Appellee.

DECIDED: August 5, 1999 ______________________

Before PLAGER, Circuit Judge, ARCHER, Senior Circuit Judge, and RADER, Circuit Judge.

PLAGER, Circuit Judge. Terry J. Hatter, Jr., et al. appeal the damages calculation of the Court of
Federal Claims,

Hatter v. United States, 38 Fed. Cl. 166 (1997) (Hatter VI), on remand from this court's decision in
Hatter v. United States, 64 F.3d 647 (Fed. Cir. 1995) (Hatter IV).1 In Hatter IV, we held that the

35
Compensation Clause of the United States Constitution, art. III, o 1, forbids diminishment of the
compensation of Article III judges once in office and that the imposition of social security taxes
on a judge's pay after taking office unconstitutionally diminishes the judge's compensation.
Because the Court of Federal Claims improperly calculated the damages award due to the
diminution, we reverse and remand the matter for further proceedings.
BACKGROUND The facts of this case have been discussed in detail in our previous two
decisions, Hatter IV and Hatter II. The pertinent facts are that the Hospital Insurance (HI) tax (i.e.,
Medicare) was imposed upon federal judges for the first time on January 1, 1983, pursuant to the
Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982, Pub. L. No. 97-248, o 278(a), 96 Stat. 324, 559
(1982) (codified as amended at 26 U.S.C. (I.R.C.) o 3121(u) (1988)). The Old Age Survivors and
Disability Insurance tax (OASDI) was first imposed upon federal judges on January 1, 1984,
pursuant to the Social Security Amendments of 1983, Pub. L. No. 98-21, o 101(a)(1), (b)(1) and
(d), 97 Stat. 65, 68, 69 (codified as amended at 26 U.S.C. (I.R.C.) o 3121(b)(5)(E) (1988) and 42
U.S.C. o 410(a)(5)(E) (1988)). The plaintiff judges asserted that their compensation was
diminished in violation of the Compensation Clause, U.S. Const., art. III, o 1.
In Hatter I, the Court of Federal Claims dismissed the judges' claim for lack of jurisdiction,
viewing it as a tax refund claim. We reversed in Hatter II, holding that the judges' claim was under
the Compensation Clause for money damages. On remand, the Court of Federal Claims in Hatter
III again dismissed the judges' claim, holding that there was no constitutional diminution because
the taxes imposed were nondiscriminatory and generally applicable to the public. We reversed that
judgment in Hatter IV. We held that the judges' compensation had been unconstitutionally
diminished by taxes imposed after they took office and remanded the case for calculation of
damages for sums improperly withheld. The Supreme Court granted certiorari; our judgment was
affirmed in Hatter V due to lack of a quorum. 2
On remand, the Court of Federal Claims awarded damages only to the eight original judges 3 who
were parties to the original complaint filed on December 29, 1989. Moreover, damages were
limited to the amount of OASDI taxes withheld in January 1984 for services rendered in
December 1983, before the period covered by the retroactive 1984 salary increase. The 1984 and
subsequent pay raises of the judges were determined by the court to be more than sufficient to
offset the OADSI taxes imposed in subsequent years. All other claims for damages, i.e., the
OASDI claim of the later-filing judges and the later-filed HI claim of all the judges, were denied.
The Court of Federal Claims determined that the continuing claim doctrine did not apply to the
judges' salary payments and, as a result, the OASDI claims of the later-filing judges and the HI
claims of all the judges were barred by the statute of limitations. The court also determined that,
even if the continuing claim doctrine could be applied to the judges' salary payments, salary
increases had more than offset any compensation diminution caused by the imposition of OASDI
and HI taxes during the six-year limitations period.

DISCUSSION As a preliminary matter, the judges assert that Hatter VI "did not implement [the]
mandate" of Hatter IV because the Court of Federal Claims reconsidered the question of whether
the social security taxes effected a diminution in salary. In Hatter IV, we stated:
Social Security taxes diminish the compensation of Article III judges who took office prior to
enactment of the taxes. This court therefore reverses and remands the case for tax refunds or
recoveries for the sums improperly withheld from the claimants' salaries.
Hatter IV, 64 F.3d at 653 (emphasis added). That language is clear. We determined that a new tax
on a sitting Article III judge effected an unlawful diminution of that judge's compensation. Having
decided the liability question, the remand was for the purpose of ascertaining the damages for that
violation, i.e., "for the sums improperly withheld."
The controlling question in this appeal is whether the Government is correct that an
unconstitutional diminution in the compensation of a group of judges, resulting from a tax
unlawfully applied, may be fully offset by any and all future salary increases generally granted to
the judiciary. The Government's position was adopted by the trial court.
We conclude that the Government's argument is fundamentally flawed, and results in a
trivialization of the constitutional protection accorded judges by Article III, the Compensation
Clause. 4 The consequence of the Government's argument subverts the very purpose of the
Compensation Clause, and is wrong, both in law and in policy.

36
 1.
The purpose of the Constitution's Compensation Clause - federal judges shall receive "a
Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office" - is to protect
and preserve the independence of the judiciary. This purpose, and the reasons for this salutary
protection of judicial independence, are well understood and well documented. A reader
unfamiliar with the literature on the subject will find a thorough introduction to the matter in the
Supreme Court's seminal opinion in Evans v. Gore, 253 U.S. 245 (1920). 5. To understand the
significance of this issue, it is necessary to put it in its historical context. The Administrative
Office of the U.S. Courts uses 1969 as the benchmark for measuring changes in judicial salaries;
that was the year that the first Quadrennial Salary Commission's recommendations were
substantially implemented by Congress and the President. The Quadrennial Salary Commission
was created in an attempt to take the salaries of the judiciary, Congress, and senior executive
officials out of politics, and to base salary increases for these officials on cost-of-living changes
similar to those granted to General Schedule federal employees. As the history since 1969
illustrates, the attempt failed. 6. Since 1969, with a few notable exceptions, judicial salaries have
not kept pace with annual increases in inflation. Overall, measured in terms of purchasing power,
judges' salaries have declined since 1969 by more than 23 percent. This did not happen as a result
of actions by Congress directly reducing the compensation of judges, in which case it would have
been remediable under the Constitution. Rather, it results from the political environment in which
annual Congressional appropriations of funds for the judiciary occur. For budgeting purposes,
judges' salaries are tied to salaries of elected officials, including those of Congress. Because
Congress rarely grants itself salary increases, the judiciary rarely receives increases, even those
promised and scheduled as cost-of-living adjustments. The history of the linkage between
congressional salaries and judicial salaries is long and complicated. Simply put, Title 2, U.S.C. o
135 (for district judges; similar provisions apply to the compensation of other Article III judges)
ties judicial salaries to Section 205 of Title 2. Section 205, the "Adjustment Act," provides for an
annual cost-of-living salary adjustment for judges, members of Congress, and Executive Schedule
officials when the rates of pay of employees under the General Schedule are adjusted for inflation;
the Ethics Reform Act of 1989, Pub. L. No. 101-194, 103 Stat. 1716, keyed the adjustment to the
index known as the Employment Cost Index - ECI. Congress made a valiant effort in connection
with the 1989 Ethics Reform Act to play catch-up. Salaries of top government officials, and
judges, which for years had been lagging behind inflation, were adjusted in the amount of 7.9% in
1990 and 29.5% in 1991. This was followed in 1992 and 1993 by the promised annual
inflationary adjustments pursuant to the Adjustment Act, and as indicated by the ECI. Since then,
in every fiscal year (except one, 1994), General Schedule employees have had their salaries
adjusted in response to increases in the ECI; however, in every fiscal year (except one, 1998),
Congress, dealing with its own political concerns, denied the promised similar adjustment to
judges.

Hmm? Do you reckon that was due to their discovery that the Congress had already done
away with Article III Judges, except for those sitting at the Supreme Court level?
Remember, the Judicial Code of 1911 made all District and Circuit courts into entirely
administrative Art. IV Territorial Courts; and changed all Art. III Federal District and
Circuit Court Judges into Article IV Executive Administrators, not Article III Judicial
Officers.

This is why, I believe, we see a change in the bent and arguments by the government, to
wit:

Thus, despite occasional gains, judges' salaries remain substantially behind the cost-of-living
index, even taking into account the recent relatively modest increases in inflation. The issue is
hardly the dollar cost of the needed adjustment in judicial salaries - the entire judiciary budget
constitutes two-tenths of one percent (0.2%) of the annual budget of the Federal Government, and

37
the salaries of Article III judges constitute only seven percent (7%) of the annual judiciary budget.
Fairness to the judiciary, and the protection of its quality and independence, would come at a very
small cost in dollars.
This brief review of the recent history of judicial compensation policy highlights the wisdom of
the founders in including in Article III the express provision for protection of judicial salaries. In
the larger view, it behooves the Government to ensure that that protection has real meaning, since
the judiciary's ability to function as an independent judiciary is a cornerstone of the people's
freedom. Professor Katzmann, in his recent book, stated the point well: This relationship [between
the federal judiciary and Congress] shapes the administration of justice in critical ways. What is at
issue in part is the integrity of political institutions: the judiciary needs to function in an
environment respectful of its core values and mission, with the requisite resources; and the
legislative branch seeks a judicial system that faithfully interprets its laws and efficiently
discharges justice. But a goal even greater than the well-being of particular branches of
government is at stake: the preservation of the means by which justice is dispensed fairly and
efficiently.

2.
The Supreme Court has had several occasions to expound on the law of the Compensation Clause
and on those occasions has established the following propositions. The imposition of a new federal
tax that has the effect of reducing the judicial compensation of judges already in office is
unconstitutional. See Evans v. Gore, 253 U.S. 245 (1920). However, an income tax levied against
the judicial salary of judges who took office after the levy is in effect is constitutional, when the
taxing measure is of general, non-discriminatory application to all earners of income. See
O'Malley v. Woodrough, 307 U.S. 277 (1939). In addition, though Congress may not rescind a
salary increase for judges once it has gone into effect - that would be a diminishment of
compensation - Congress is under no constitutional obligation to grant salary increases. See
United States v. Will, 449 U.S. 200 (1980); see also Atkins v. United States, 556 F.2d 1028 (Ct.
Cl. 1977).
The question before us is one not yet presented to the Supreme Court, or previously to this court.
We earlier held, consistent with Evans, and now law of this case, that the imposition in 1983 on
federal judges then in office of entirely new taxes - the OASDI and HI taxes - is unconstitutional.
The question before us now is, what is the remedy for this unconstitutional imposition, as a result
of which these judges have had withheld from their judicial salaries sums of money to which they
are lawfully entitled. The theory of the Government led the trial court to declare that: if Congress
mandates that federal judges pay a certain amount in a new tax but, at the same time, gives those
judges a salary increase in an amount equal to or greater than the amount of the tax, then any
diminution within the meaning of the Compensation Clause is immediately cured. This is what
occurred with respect to plaintiffs.
Hatter VI, 38 Fed. Cl. at 172. The Government's theory of the case, that the judges sustained little
if any damages from this unconstitutional imposition because whatever losses they sustained were
offset by later general salary increases, is fundamentally flawed. The basic problem with the
Government's theory is that it would create, with regard to judicial compensation, two different
classes of judges. One class would be all judges who held office from and after 1983. Those
judges would be entitled the full benefit of congressionally-granted salary increases, such as they
might be, awarded during their term of office. The other class would be all judges who held office
prior to 1983 and continued in office for some time thereafter. These latter judges would not
receive the Congressionally-granted salary increases which became effective after 1983, because a
significant portion of the increases would be allocated to pay the damage award to which they are
entitled as a result of the earlier unconstitutional imposition, a damage award owed them by the
Government.
That is not an acceptable proposition. There is no basis on which the pre-1983 judges ought to be
made to pay, from their own pockets and out of their own salaries, including generally-granted
increases, the damages owed to them by the Government, when the judges who were not subject
to the unconstitutional imposition are entitled to keep all of their salaries, including the increases
the judiciary was awarded. 9 The unconstitutional imposition which resulted in dollars being taken
from the pre-1983 judges, dollars which were then allocated by the Government to other uses,

38
created a specific liability upon the Government to these judges. It would be inequitable to charge
these judges with the duty to pay their own damages from their own salaries, out of salary
increases that Congress thereafter granted to all judges, increases unrelated to that liability. It also
would be destructive of the principle that "The Judges . . . shall . . . receive for their Services, a
Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office." U.S.
Const., art. III, o1.
Congress's purpose in granting the increases received by judges in the years since 1983 is relevant
to our inquiry. When the Constitutional Convention turned its attention to Article III and the issue
of judicial compensation, the draftsmen first proposed that Congress would be precluded from
either decreasing or increasing the compensation of judges. As the Supreme Court explained in
Will, "Gouverneur Morris succeeded in striking the prohibition on increases; with others, he
believed the Congress should be at liberty to raise salaries to meet such contingencies as inflation,
a phenomenon known in that day as it is in ours." Will, 449 U.S. at 219.
In The Federalist No. 79, Alexander Hamilton explained the thinking behind this approach:
It will readily be understood, that the fluctuations in the value of money, and in the state of
society, rendered a fixed rate of compensation [of judges] in the Constitution inadmissible. What
might be extravagant to-day might in half a century become penurious and inadequate. It was
therefore necessary to leave it to the discretion of the legislature to vary its provisions in
conformity to the variations in circumstances; yet under such restrictions as to put it out of the
power of that body to change the condition of the individual for the worse.
The Federalist No. 79, at 491-492 (Alexander Hamilton) (Clinton Rossiter ed., 1961). The
wisdom of our founding fathers is borne out by history; since 1969, the base date currently
used by the judiciary, inflation has increased by 344% in the aggregate. In the general salary
increases Congress has seen fit to grant the judiciary in the years since 1983, there is nothing to
suggest that the congressional purpose was to make whole the losses sustained by the pre-1983
judges resulting from the unconstitutional imposition of the tax at issue in this case. On the
contrary, everything in the record and the legislative history makes clear that these increases were
in response to continued concerns expressed in Congress, within the judiciary itself, in the bar, as
well as among segments of the informed public, concerns for the well-being and continued vitality
of the federal judiciary if the slide in purchasing power resulting from continued and unadjusted-
for inflation was not halted.
That slide was as much a concern with regard to the pre-1983 judges who remained in service as it
was with regard to those who came to the office later. To deprive the pre-1983 judges of the
benefit of those increases by using them to offset the losses they incurred from the Government's
earlier wrongful act would not only be unfair, but would be contrary to Congress's purpose in
granting the increases. The only proper conclusion that can be reached on the facts before us is
that these plaintiffs are entitled to the full measure of compensation for the damages they sustained
by the wrong that was visited upon them, and that measure is independent of any generally
awarded adjustment to judicial salaries.

3.
The judgment of the trial court must be reversed, and the matter must be returned to that court for
determination of damages consistent with this opinion. Because a remand is necessary, there
remains a disputed issue that needs resolving regarding the application of the statute of limitations.
The judges argue that this case involves what is known as a 'continuing wrong,' so that each year
in which moneys are withheld by the Government, a new cause of action arises. By this theory, no
judge whose salary was or is subject to the unconstitutional imposition is barred by the six-year
statute of limitations applicable to suits in the Court of Federal Claims. See 28 U.S.C. o 2401(a)
(1994) ("[E]very civil action commenced against the United States shall be time barred unless the
complaint is filed within six years after the right of action first accrues."). The Government
responds that the continuing wrong doctrine is inapplicable to this type of case, and cites this
court's opinion in Hart v. United States, 910 F.2d 815 (Fed. Cir. 1990). The Government also
notes that the application of the continuing wrong theory would mean that no judge would be
entitled to more than six years' worth of recovery, since any claim for years prior to that would be
barred. We agree with the Government that this is not the type of case in which the continuing
wrong theory makes sense. See Brown Park Estates - Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127

39
F.3d 1449, 1456-59 (Fed. Cir. 1997). The cause of action arose when the statutes which
established the unconstitutional imposition became effective. Some judges 'voluntarily' allowed
the taxes to be taken from them year after year, in the sense that they did not protest the imposition
in the only legally-effective way open to them, by a timely challenge in the courts. A judge who
does not challenge the imposition by filing a complaint within the period allowed from the time
the cause of action accrued is not protected from the defense of the running of the statute of
limitations; like any litigant against the Government, such a plaintiff is subject to having the cause
of action barred. In this case, suit was brought not as a class action but on behalf of the
individually named judges. In that regard, there are two causes of action arising under two
different statutes. The Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982, Pub. L. No. 97-248,
imposed the Hospital Insurance portion of the Social Security tax on federal judges effective
January 1, 1983. Since the pleadings in this case were filed on December 29, 1989, just short of
seven years after the cause of action arose, all claims under that Act are subject to being barred by
the running of the statute of limitations.
The Old Age and Survivors Disability Insurance portion of the Social Security tax was imposed on
federal judges by the Social Security Amendments of 1983, Pub. L. No. 98-21, and was effective
January 1, 1984. Since this suit was filed by the original ten judges a few days short of six years
from when that cause of action arose, the suit on that claim is not barred.
The rather convoluted accounting the trial judge found himself enmeshed in because of the theory
of the case that was adopted in the trial court is wholly irrelevant; therefore we express no opinion
thereon.
CONCLUSION. The judgment of the Court of Federal Claims is reversed, and the matter
remanded to that court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. REVERSED AND
REMANDED.
1 The history of this case involves the following six decisions: Hatter v. United States, 21 Cl. Ct.
786 (1990) (Hatter I), Hatter v. United States, 953 F.2d 626 (Fed. Cir. 1992) (Hatter II), Hatter v.
United States, 31 Fed. Cl. 436 (1994) (Hatter III), Hatter v. United States, 64 F.3d 647 (Fed. Cir.
1995) (Hatter IV), Hatter v. United States, 117 S. Ct. 39 (1996) (Hatter V), and Hatter v. United
States, 38 Fed. Cl. 166 (1997) (Hatter VI).
2 The absence of a quorum resulted from recusals, presumably by Justices who could be affected
by the outcome of the case. The members of the panel of this court who decided the earlier appeals
and who are participating in this decision were all appointed subsequent to the events, and thus are
not affected by the outcome.
3 We follow the designation of the Court of Federal Claims, which referred to the plaintiffs filing
the original complaint as the "original" judges and those who joined or rejoined (after not joining
the appeal of Hatter I) the amended complaints as the "later-filing" judges.
4 The extent of the trivialization is illustrated by the damage award made by the trial court: the
judges alleged that their out-of-pocket losses from the unconstitutional imposition varied between
$20,000 to $56,000, with an average of about $47,000; the trial court's judgment awarded a total
of $329 to the district judges and $348 to the appellate judge, plus interest.
5 See also United States v. Will, 449 U.S. 200 (1980); O'Malley v. Woodrough, 307 U.S. 277
(1939); Miles v. Graham, 268 U.S. 501 (1925).
6 Atkins v. U.S., 556 F.2d 1028 (Ct. Cl. 1977), was an unsuccessful attempt to force the
Government to address the destructive effect of inflation on the judiciary during the period
1969 - 1975, when the value of the dollar, measured by the Consumer Price Index, decreased by
34%, and Congress failed to provide increases to protect judges' purchasing power.
7 Robert Katzmann, Courts and Congress 1 (Brookings Institution Press 1997).
8 For purposes of the discussion, we use the 1983 date as the significant cut-off. As will be seen in
Part 3 of this opinion, for reasons related to the statute of limitations problem, that
date may not be the controlling one.
9 Of course the later-appointed judges are subject to general tax levies in effect at the time of their
appointment, see O'Malley v. Woodrough, 307 U.S. 277 (1939), but that is another matter entirely.
10 See Report of 1989 Commission on Executive, Legislative and Judicial Salaries: Hearings
Before the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs, 101st Cong., 1st. Sess., 130 (1989).”

40
Now then, let us haggle no further with regards to the devaluated value of the Federal
Reserve Notes. The truth of this matter, is that nobody could have a profit when they are
forced to accept “Worthless Securities” as their only form of payment.

GERMANY ALL OVER AGAIN

What we are all experiencing today in the United States of America and elsewhere, is an
exact mirror of what happened to the people of Germany and apparently, nobody has
learned anything. So, for a voice of the people, I remind all the several States of our
Union to look at the example pertaining to private Reich Bank Notes in Germany and
compare their violent end to the Federal Reserve Bank Notes in the United States today.
I will quote as follows:

“Under the terms of the Versailles Treaty, practically all of Germany’s gold was taken away
from her, together with 75% of her iron ore deposits and mines. All of her colonies were
taken away and about 25% of her other physical property.”

The terms of this Treaty were diabolical. They were directed to destroy the real German
people. From the Time of the signing of the Treaty in June 1919 until the beginning of
1922, the International money powers who were in control of the Reichsbank and the
German Government, were manipulating to gain control of the actual physical property in
Germany.
They went so far as to get the banking Laws of Germany drastically changed, so that they
could borrow unlimited amounts from Reich bank and purchase physical property with
the knowledge that the loans could later be repaid with worthless currency.

“To give one some idea of the volume of the currency that was turned out in Germany, one
has only to note what happened to the price levels of Germany. Remember that during the
war the German price levels had not increased as much as they had in the United States.”

In 1920 the price level in Germany increased 1500% over the pre-war level; in 1921 it
reached 3500% over the pre-war level, and by October 23 rd, when the currency became
worthless, it was 709 billion over the pre-war level. In other words, predatory
Internationalist had printed private marks and forced them into the money stream with the
avowed purpose of destroying the money system of Germany.

That meant the destruction of all insurance policies and mortgages owned by the
real German people.

41
The International bankers had prepared themselves. They had obtained control of the
physical properties and could later pay loans, many of which had been manipulated
through the privately owned Reichsbank, with worthless money.

“The inflation in Germany was misnamed. It was not a German inflation. It was a private
money issue inflation, perpetrated by international schemers.”

“The inflation was not a government money inflation. It was a inflation of private
Reichsbank notes. The officers of the Reichsbank – a privately owned institution – were
responsible for issuing money in sufficient volume to destroy the entire banking structure
and make all of the money of Germany worthless.”

If you are wondering why the Germans accepted such devastating terms, it might have
had something to do with the fact that, among the dozens of AB’s agents at the
Conference, Paul Warburg, Vice-Chairman of the Federal Reserve, was advising the
American delegation, while his brother, Max Warburg, who had been chief of the
German secret service, sat across the table advising the German delegation.

The one thing that nobody ever talks about though, is how Germany used all those
worthless paper securities, or Reich Notes, to purchase all the gold, which is how the
NAZIS had so much Gold by the end of WWII. So, who are the largest Gold holders
today? Because today, as at the end of WWII, somebody has been hording the Gold
which they have stolen, by purchasing it with Federal Reserve Notes (FRN’s) of which
the value thereof has devaluated by over 2,275% and which they hold all Americans
and others across the world liable for, $1.00 for $1.00; and then they add the unpaid
usury to the Nations National Debt.

Now, as previously stated herein, the 1969 Edition of the Army Civil Affairs Manual,
teaches us that when any form of Two Party Notes used as the currency of a society
which have suffered “INFLATION” and “DEVALUATION”, are overburdensome
upon the society forced to use it. The said FM41-10 Manual say’s that the
devaluated Two Party Notes must be removed from circulation and replaced, if by
no other means, then they shall be replaced with temporary “Emergency Military
Transcripts (EMT’s)”.

Until such time, there can be no taxes based upon ones gains, or profits, because quit
frankly, it is a mathematical impossibility for one to have profits and gains, when the
only form of remuneration actually both, by definition and by law, the World Reserve
Currency (The U.S. Dollar – Federal Reserve Notes (FRN’s)) have become “Worthless
Securities”! The U.S. Code (U.S.C.) and the Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) are
clear on ones rights to wright off 100% of ones losses, resulting from Securities
becoming worthless, or due too one being compensated with “Worthless Securities”,
either way, the IRS allows for writing off said losses, to wit:

“26 I.R.C. 165q, Worthless securities. – (1) General rule. – If any security which is a capital
asset becomes worthless during the taxable year, the loss resulting therefrom shall, for the

42
 purposes of this subtitle, be treated as a loss from the sale or exchange, on the last day of the
taxable year, of a capital asset.”

and…

“(2) Security defined.

(c) A bond, debenture, note, or certificate, or other evidence of indebtedness, issued by a
corporation or by a government or political subdivision thereof, with interest coupons or in
registered form.”

Much more is shown herein, regarding how these FRN’s are also legally considered
TOXIC ASSETS and other evidences of debt. But suffice it to say, that even if one was
or those who are engaged in a Taxable Activity, if the same were only paid with Toxic
Assets and Worthless Securities, even if at first glance it appeared to be Billions in
profits, it would only evidence Billions in actual losses and not gains.
Losses and gains can only be calculated by using a fair and accurately balanced currency
with an actual and real value. But when a currency has devaluated by high percentages,
or worse yet, has actually taken on a negative value, then it has become a “Worthless
Security”; and it is a felony, to knowingly pass off upon members of the public a
worthless, recalled, counterfeit note, two party note, toxic asset, or otherwise worthless
security upon unknowing, unsuspecting public would make it a public theft and when
done by government personnel, armed under color of governmental police powers and
authorities, in an attempt to collect a debt, or tax which is not due, nor owing, makes such
fraud and extortion, felony armed robbery, not to mention both, State and Federal RICO
violations, which the herein Respondent Counter Claims and Charges all whose hands
touched Respondent’s files, rather at CDOR in part, or DORA in whole, this charge still
remains .

Now, let us recap here, prior to moving any further. Therefore, President Lincoln knew
very well that the Nation was facing grave matters, as Lincoln stated, “a crises” and
Lincoln knew all too well who was behind this crises when he stated:

“The money powers prey upon the nation in times of peace and conspire against it in times
of adversity. The banking powers are more despotic than a monarchy, more insolent than
autocracy, more selfish than bureaucracy. They denounce as public enemies all who question
their methods or throw light upon their crimes. I have two great enemies, the Southern Army
in front of me and the bankers in the rear. Of the two, the one at my rear is my greatest foe.
Corporations have been enthroned, and an era of corruption in high places will follow. The
money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices
of the people until the wealth is aggregated in the hands of a few, and the Republic is destroyed.
(See: Abraham Lincoln  (more by this author) 1809-1865 (Age at death: 56 approx.)

President Lincoln was assassinated before he could complete plans for reestablishing
constitutional government in the Southern States and end the martial rule by executive
order, and the 14th Article in Amendment to the Constitution created a new citizenship
status for the new expanded jurisdiction. New laws for the District of Columbia were
established and passed by Congress in 1871, supplanting those established Feb. 27, 1801
and May 3, 1802. The District of Columbia was re-incorporated in 1872, and all states in

43
the Union were reformed as Franchisees of the Federal Corporation so that a new Union
of the United States could be created.

Furthermore, I wonder if they were properly registered as a card carrying communist, or

communist sympathizers/ businessmen / agents / representatives, et al; along with their
foreign agents registration & statements to do business with these foreign powers and
foreign agents / principles and their "BENEFACTORS" OF THE COMMUNIST
PARTY???!!! (See: https://www.cpusa.org) Also See: https://books.googleusercontent.com/books/content?
req=AKW5QadQV6KWitApLeHpVvBOD4lKbwtT_uRsirahdZbL5YMZrysPrqsKK_tU39aUDAHlgfBNRU5yKgjk09kL5lKWcgGHBEpmGmzdy87zdq8g2B3QolVZOHwvRFnJ0aECMnyITuAXaHBBTO3urS_rkxdfbVPkPXMoEENwIGVtk9WgAuBwuhcKgdmfOF
gR-FBZv9cNgWtpHzqUDzexKqTMUa6h3KzWxfeEBVyqLsVDvtAl_ysHDPTqEJW5dDIlyALH2XX3LpCcmE1ZUzZKmojrJyeWzlBUQDDzCQqLP58RsecMe4ctnOwci0M

Pursuant to the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (FARA).

But Rather, We, The People have been secretly sacked by an Internationally Recognized
Criminal Occupying Belligerent and their OVERLORD, (i.e.) their U.N. Permanent
Observer, (i.e.) the HOLY SEE, currently presided over by the Sovereign Pontiff of
ROME and benefactor/inheritor of the fallen Imperial Emperor of the ROMAN
EMPIRE , (A.K.A.) POPE FRANCES, and as shown above, We, The People have no
earthly idea that these INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL(s) are also the current
OCCUPYING BELLIGERENTS over the USA plantation; and

The said Occupying Belligerents have silently declared a HOLY WAR upon US and our
Posterity, as evidenced herein. We, The People having been presented with absolutely
NO Presentments or Declarations of War. We have had nothing given to US, nor
announced to US, not even as the Neutral Parties, as required pursuant to International
Law and standing duties and obligations in international Peace Treaties.

Furthermore, there has been zero disclosure to US, indicative of an enemy combatant
declaring WAR upon US, nor notification that we are now residing, presiding, or are
otherwise inside a War Zone, or that We, The People were and/or are now living in the
middle of a newly recognized “Theater of War”, or Area of Military Command, or
moreover, that we are now residing in an “OCCUPIED AREA”, or “OCCUPIED
TERRITORY”, or otherwise stated, an Area of Active Military Operations.

We, The People have never received any type of Public Notice that We, The People are
now residing within an Occupied Area. By the way, it is now under the Military
Authority and Military Control of a Foreign Military Area Commander, or Foreign
Occupation via a foreign Occupying Belligerent!

In light of the evidence and facts presented herein, by testimony on record, over the last
15-20 years, or longer, it is very clear that the governments of the United States and the
several States united have been dissolved and placed into the hands of foreign private
corporations, engaged in business “FOR PROFIT”. An example of this, can be found
with such corporations, as the “MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION” who has been
Codifying the history of the worlds largest Bankruptcy and Reorganization in the history
of the World. They are incapable of meeting their internal and external obligations and
furthermore, their failures are being documented on a daily basis; and

44
The following are excerpts from the Senate Report, 93 rd Congress, November 19, 1973,
Special Committee On The Termination Of The National Emergency, United States
Senate, to wit:

“Since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of Declared National
Emergency.... Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may:
seize property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities; assign
military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and
communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and, in a
plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens.”

and…

“A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of their lives under Emergency
Rule.  For 40 years, freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution
have, in varying degrees, been abridged by laws brought into force by states of national
emergency....”

and…

“…DECLARING A PERMANENT STATE OF NATIONAL EMERGENCY.”

All that is necessary, is for one, to merely take the time to go look it up and it can be
found in Title 12, in section 95b you'll find the following codification of the Emergency
War Powers:

“The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations heretofore or hereafter
taken, promulgated, made, or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary of
the Treasury since March 4, 1933, pursuant to the authority conferred by subsection (b) of
section 5 of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended (12 USCS, 95a), are hereby approved
and confirmed.  (March 9, 1933, c. 1, Title 1, 1, 48 Stat. 1)”

 It is clear that the Bankrupt, de facto government of the UNITED STATES, is operating
under a Declared State of Emergency, pursuant to the War Powers Act; and Executive
Orders; not the Constitution for the United States of America, which has been, in effect,
and issued under its Admiralty Law, Letters of Marque (piracy) to its private agencies
IRS, ATF, FBI and DEA, with further enforcement by its officers in the Courts, local
police and sheriffs, all of whom, have aided in ruthless and relentless act of warfare,
which they have all, jointly and individually, committed against the Peace, Dignity, the
American People, whom they have classified as: the American alien enemies.

On March 17, 1993, in Congressional Record-House, at Pg. 5321, Mr. Traficant stated:
“Mr. Speaker, we are here now in chapter 11. Members of Congress are official trustees
presiding over the greatest reorganization of any bankrupt entity in world history, the U.S.
Government. We are setting forth hopefully a blue print for our future. There are some
who say it is a coroner’s report that will lead to our demise...”

and…

45
 “...But let me give one word of caution here today. America already has race wars, let us be
honest about it. We already have gender wars, let us be honest about it. We already have
age wars, let us be honest about it. One thing this Congress had better not get involved in
and get trapped into is a class war on money. In America if you cannot earn all that you
can, there is something wrong and there is no more a spirit of free enterprise.”

and…

“I want to say this to the members. We may talk about taxing the rich, but the rich people
have already taken their companies and their jobs out of America. Be careful that the rich
people do not take their money out of America, because the Government already raises our
kids, feeds our kids, houses our kids, and the government is doing a very poor job of it. I
think mom and dad would be better utilized there once again...” [Underlined emphases are
mine]

Who are these “Rich”, who have removed their companies and jobs out of America
already and placing Congress under fear of them now removing their money from our
country? I’ll provide a few more definitions to answer that question, to wit:

“PAPACY. See Papist; Roman Catholic Church ; Papal Supremacy.

and…

“PAPAL SUPREMACY. The supremacy which the Pope claimed not only over the Emperor of
the Holy Roman Empire, but over all other Christian princes. The theory was that they stood to the
Pope as feudal vassals to a supreme lord; as such, the Pope claimed the right to enforce the duties
due to him from his feudal subordinates through an ascending scale of penalties culminating in the
absolution of the prince's subjects from the bonds of allegiance, and in the dis-position of the
sovereign himself. The papal supremacy was overthrown in England by acts of the Parliament
which met in 1529 and was dissolved in 1530, ending in the Act of Supremacy. See Hannis
Taylor, Science of Jurispr.; Boyce, Holy Rom. Emp.; Freeman, Sel. Hist. Essays; 2 Phill. Intern.
Law.” (Also See: pgs. 2443)

And what money of the PAPACY, is being referred to by the Congress, other than paper
credit, to wit:

“PAPER CREDIT. Credit given on the security of any written obligation purporting to represent
property.”

and…

“PAPER MONEY. The engagements to pay money which are issued by governments and banks,
and which pass as money, Pardessus, Droit Com. n. 9. Bank-notes are generally considered as
cash, and will answer all the purposes of currency; but paper money is not a legal tender if
objected to. But see Legal Tender. See National Banks; Money; Gold.

and…

46
 “PAPER TITLE. A title to land evidenced by one or more conveyances, the term generally
implying that such title, while it has color or plausibility, is without substantial validity.” See
Color of Title.

and…

“PAPIST. A term formerly applied in Great Britain to Roman Catholics. By the act of 10 Geo.
IV. c. 7, known as the Catholic Emancipation Act, Roman Catholics were restored in general to
the full enjoyment of all civil rights, except that of holding ecclesiastical offices and certain high
appointments In the state. Before that act their condition had been much ameliorated by various
statutes, beginning with 18 Geo. III. c. 60. As to the right of holding property for religious
purposes, the 2 & 3 Wm. IV. c. 115, placed them on a level with Protestant dissenters, and the 7 &
8 Vict. c. 102, and 9 & 10 Vict. e. 49, repealed all enactments oppressive to Roman Catholics. See
Whart. Lex. See Papal Supremacy; Roman Catholic Church.

And the alleged Paper Money, or Credit, or Two Party / Joint Notes, worthless bills of
debt credit, have always existed as a “PROMISSORY NOTE” – Bouvier’s 1914 Ed. pg.
2745, to wit:

“PROMISSORY NOTE: at a time therein expressed, a sum of money to a certain person therein
named or to his order, for value received. It Is dated and signed by the maker. It is never under
seal; Merritt v. Cole, 9 Hun (N. Y) 98; even when made by a corporation; Steele v. Mfg. Co., 16
Wend. (N. Y.) 265. But In L. R. 3 Ch. Ap. 758, it was held that a "debenture" under a corporate
seal was provable against the company by the endorsee, free from equities between the payee and
the corporation, and, tremble, that it was a promissory note.

In Mackay v. Church, 15 R. I. 121, 23 Atl. 108, 2 Am. St. Rep. 881, it was held that a paper seal
of a corporation on an instrument in the form of a promissory note should be regarded as "mere
excess." No particular form of words is necessary; but there must be an intention to make a note;
see 15 M. & W. 29; Benj. Chalm. Bills 274; and it should amount in legal effect to an absolute
promise to pay money; Strickland v. Holbrooke, 75 Cal. 268, 17 Pac. 204.”

and…

“By the Negotiable Instruments Act, the -negotiability of an instrument is not affected by the fact
that it is not dated or bears a seal or it does not specify the value given. He who makes this
promise is called the maker, and he to whom It is made is the payee; 3 Kent M. A writing in the
form of a note payable to the maker's order, becomes a note by endorsement; Miller v. Weeks, 22
Pa. 89. A note payable to the maker's order, and indorsed by him in blank, Is, in legal effect, a note
payable to bearer and is transferable by delivery; Jones v. Shapera, 57 Fed. 457, 6 C. C. A. 423.

“Although a promissory note in its original shape bears no resemblance to a bill of ex- change, yet
when indorsed it is exactly similar to one; for then it is an order by the lndorser of the note upon
the maker to pay the indorsee. The lndorser is as it were the drawer; the maker, the acceptor; and
the indorsee, the payee; 4 Burr. 669; 4 Term 148; 3 Burr. 1224. Most of the rules applicable to
bills of ex- change equally affect promissory note.

“There are two principal qualities essential to the validity of a note:

“First, that it be payable at all events, and not dependent on any contingency; Cushman v.
Haynes, 20 Pick. (Mass.) 132; nor payable out of any particular fund; Stamps v. Graves, 11 N. C.
102; U. S. v. Bank, 5 How. (U. S.) 382. By the Negotiable Instruments Act the promise or order to

47
 pay must be unconditional and such promise is unconditional, though there is an indication of a
particular fund out of which reimbursement is to be made, or a statement of the transaction which
gives rise to the instrument. But an order or promise to pay out of a particular fund is not un-
conditional; and

“Second, it is required that it be for the payment of money only; M'Cormlck v. Trotter, 10 S. & R.
(Pa.) 94; Klauser v. Biggerstaff, 47 Wis. 551, 3 N. W. 357, 32 Am. Rep. 773; Black v. Ward, 27
Mich. 191, 15 Am. Rep. 162; Collins v. Lincoln, 11 Vt. 268 (though statutes In some states have
made notes payable in merchandise negotiable); that is, in whatever is legal tender at the place of
payment; 2 Ames, Bills 828; and not in bank-notes; though it has been held differently; Judah v.
Harris, 19 Johns. (N. Y) 144. The rule on this subject is said to be more strict in England than
here, but to have been relaxed there in 2 Q. B. Div. 194. It is said that the tendency here is to use
the term money in a very wide sense; Benj. Chalm. Bills, 2d Am. ed. 10. By the Negotiable
Instruments Act, the instrument must be payable in money and it is immaterial that a particular
kind of current money is designated.

and…

“A promissory note payable to order or bearer passes by Indorsement, and although a chose

in action, the holder may bring suit on it in his own name. Although a simple contract, a
sufficient consideration is Implied from the nature of the instrument. See 5 Com. Dig. 133, n., 151,
472; 4 B. A C. 235; 1 C. & M. 16. It has been urged that, upon principle, negotiable instruments
are contracts binding by their own force, and therefore not requiring any consideration; Langd.
Contr. | 49. ' When the back of a note is covered by various indorsements, an assignment of the
note, written on a piece of paper pasted to the note, will pass the legal title.

and…

“By the Negotiable Instruments Act, one who puts his name on the back of an instrument prior
to or at the time of delivery becomes an endorser; Rockfleld v. Bank, 77 Ohio, 311, 83 N. E. 392,
14 L. R. A. (N. S.) 842; Deary v. Choquet, 28 R. I. 338, 67 Atl. 421, 14 L. R. A. (N. S.) 847. See
Indorsement; Allonge.

and…

“A negotiable instrument payable to bearer, by custom of trade, passes from hand to hand
by delivery, and the holder for the time being, if he is a bona fide holder for value without
notice, has a good title, not- withstanding any defect in title in the person from whom he took
it; [1891] 1 Ch. 270.

and…

“As to whether a stipulation in an instrument, otherwise in the form of a promissory note,

for the payment of an attorney's fee for the collection of the note in case of dishonor renders
the instrument non-negotiable, see Bills of Exchange. (Also See: Bouvier's Law Dictionary
and Concise Encyclopedia, ... v.3.Bouvier, John, 1787-1851. Pgs. 2745)

Now, with the facts being cited and stated above, the citations make it clear what the law
is pertaining to: Notes, Promissory Notes, Bills of Exchange, etc., and it is clear that:

“He who makes this promise is called the maker, and he to whom It is made is the payee; 3
Kent M.”

48
and…

“By the Negotiable Instruments Act the promise or order to pay must be unconditional and
such promise is unconditional”

Now, let US be enlightened by time and in lieu of the 1914 Ed., or the 1856 Ed. of
Bouvier’s, which is the only recognized law Dictionary used by the U.S. Supreme Court,
but which knows nothing about the Federal Reserve System, or it’s Federal Reserve
Notes, its Governors, etc; … But Rather, let us now look at what todays Law
Dictionaries say, which do purport to know about the Federal Reserve System, it’s Banks,
it’s Notes, who makes and prints the Notes, and by what authority, to wit:

“FEDERAL RESERVE ACT. Law which created Federal Re serve banks which act as agents in
maintaining money reserves, issuing money in the form of bank notes, lending money to banks,
and supervising banks. Ad ministered by Federal Reserve Board (q.v.).

and…
FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS. See Federal Reserve Act; Federal Reserve Board of Governors;
Federal Reserve System.

and…
FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD OF GOVERNORS. The seven member Board of Governors,
appointed by the President and confirmed by the Congress, sets reserve requirements for member
banks, reviews and approves the discount-rate actions of regional Federal Reserve Banks, sets
ceilings on the rates of interest that banks can pay on time and savings deposits, and issues
regulations. Members also sit on the Federal Open Market Committee the principal instrument for
implementing the Board's national monetary policy.

and…
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM. Network of twelve central banks to which most national
banks belong and to which state-chartered banks may belong. Membership rules require
investment of stock and minimum reserves. The Federal Reserve System was established in 1913
to give the country an elastic currency, provide facilities for discounting commercial paper and to
improve the supervision of banking.

“The System consists of five parts: the Board of Governors in Washington; the 12 Federal Reserve
Banks, their branches and other facilities situated throughout the country; the Federal Open
Market Committee; the Federal Advisory Council; and the member commercial banks, which
include all national banks and State-chartered banks that have voluntarily joined the System.”
(See: BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY 6th Edition, pg. 613 – Published 1990)

Now, the problem here, is that today's Federal Reserve Notes, with two (2) signatures on
its face, makes them a two party/or Joint Promissory Note, to wit:

49
 “PROMISSORY NOTE. A promise or engagement, in writing, to pay a specified sum at a time
therein stated, or on demand, or at sight, to a person therein named, or to his order, or bearer. An
unconditional written promise, signed by the maker, to pay absolutely and at all events a sum
certain in money, either to the bearer or to a person therein designated or his order, at a time speci-
fied therein, or at a time which must certainly arrive.
A signed paper promising to pay another a certain sum of money. An unconditional written
promise to pay a specified sum of money on demand or at a specified date. Such a note is
negotiable if signed by the maker and containing an unconditional promise to pay a sum certain in
money either on demand or at a definite time and payable to order or bearer.” U.C.C. § 3-104.
(See: BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY 6th Edition, pg. 1214 – Published 1990)

and…
“NOTE, n. An instrument containing an express and absolute promise of signer (i.e. maker) to
pay to a specified person or order, or bearer, a definite sum of money at a specified time. An
instrument that is a promise to pay other than a certificate of deposit. D.C.C. § 3-104(2)(d). Two
party instrument made by the maker and payable to payee which is negotiable if signed by the
maker and contains an unconditional promise to pay sum certain in money, on demand or at a
definite time, to order or bearer. D.C.C. § 3-104(1). A note not meeting these requirements may be
assignable but not negotiable. An abstract; a memorandum; an informal statement in writing. See
also Balloon note; Coal note; Judgment note; Promissory note; Sold note; Treasury note. (See:
BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY 6th Edition, pg. 1060 – Published 1990)

and furthermore, on that same page it states:

“JOINT NOTE. Note evidencing an indebtedness in which two or more persons agree to be
liable jointly and for payment of which all such persons must be joined in an action to recover.”
(See: BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY 6th Edition, pg. 1060 – Published 1990)

Note: A “Federal Reserve Note” would, by definition, qualify as a “Joint Note”, as

described above, as it has “two Signatures” on its face (not on back), by the notes
makers.. One, is the signature of the “Treasurer of the United States” (on the left side)
and the Second, is the signature of the “Secretary of the Treasury” (on the right side)
of the Federal Reserve Notes.

According to the very meaning and definition of Notes, Federal Reserve Notes, Two
Party Notes/Joint Notes, etc.,; and now we must know, both, the “Treasurer of the
United States” whom is (one party) and who the “Secretary of the Treasury” is the
other, or (Second party), to wit:
“The Treasurer of the United States is an official in the United States Department of the
Treasury  who was originally charged with the receipt and custody of government funds,
though many of these functions have been taken over by different bureaus of the
Department of the Treasury. Responsibility for oversight of the Bureau of Engraving and
Printing, the United States Mint, and the United States Savings Bonds Division (now the
Savings Bond Marketing Office within the Bureau of the Public Debt) was assigned to the
Treasurer in 1981. As of 2002 the Office of the Treasurer underwent a major reorganization.
The Treasurer now advises the Director of the Mint, the Director of the Bureau of
Engraving and Printing, the Deputy Secretary and the Secretary of the Treasury on matters
relating to coinage, currency and the production of other instruments by the United States.
[2]

50
 The Treasurer's signature, as well as the Treasury Secretary's, appear on Federal Reserve
Notes.” (See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treasurer_of_the_United_States )

and…
“The Secretary of the Treasury is the head of the U.S. Department of the Treasury[4] which
is concerned with financial and monetary matters, and, until 2003, also included several
federal law enforcement agencies. This position in the Federal Government of the United
States is analogous to the Minister of Finance in many other countries. The Secretary of the
Treasury is a member of the President's Cabinet, and is nominated by the President of the
United States. Nominees for The Secretary of the Treasury undergo a confirmation hearing
before the United States Senate Committee on Finance before being confirmed by the United
States Senate.
The Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and
the Secretary of Defense are generally regarded as the four most important cabinet officials
because of the importance of their departments.[5] The Secretary of the Treasury is a non-
statutory member of the U.S. National Security Council and fifth in the United States
presidential line of succession.”

The Secretary along with the Treasurer must sign Federal Reserve notes before they can
become legal tender. The Secretary also manages the United States Emergency Economic
Stabilization fund.

and…
“POWERS AND FUNCTIONS:
The Secretary of the Treasury is the principal economic advisor to the President and plays a
critical role in policy-making by bringing an economic and government financial policy
perspective to issues facing the government. The Secretary is responsible for formulating
and recommending domestic and international financial, economic, and tax policy,
participating in the formulation of broad fiscal policies that have general significance for the
economy, and managing the public debt. The Secretary oversees the activities of the
Department in carrying out its major law enforcement responsibilities; in serving as the
financial agent for the United States Government; and in manufacturing coins and currency.
The Chief Financial Officer of the government, the Secretary serves as Chairman Pro
Tempore of the President's Economic Policy Council, Chairman of the Boards and
Managing Trustee of the Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds, and as U.S. Governor
of the International Monetary Fund, the International Bank for Reconstruction and
Development, the Inter-American Development Bank, the Asian Development Bank, and
the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.” — U.S. Department of the
Treasury Web site[6]
(Also See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Secretary_of_the_Treasury )

Now, this is a perfect example of the kind of things, which I have been expressing
heretofore herein and as I will continue to do hereinafter. For the purposes of opening
the eyes of the reader, I will now cite the United States Case Law applicable to the same,
“Secretary of the Treasury” with explanation provided above and how it was the intent
of the Wiki authors, et al., to conceal the true facts and to rather, provide a nice comfy
explanation which does not invoke emotions, anger, excitement, etc. (via, Failure to
Disclose & Constructive Fraud) by disclosing the fact that we are now “Occupied”;

Much like the truth properly shown and evidenced can arouse unhappiness, anger,
discontent, hypertension, madness, temporary insanity and the like. As anyone with red

51
blood in their veins would, upon acknowledgment of the Truth, the Facts and REALITY
of the same obviously would, to wit:

“The Reorganization is located in Title 5 of United States Codes Annotated. (U.S.C.A.), The
"Explanation" at the beginning of 5 U.S.C.A. is most informative reading. The “Secretary of
Treasury” (currently Janet Yellen) was appointed as the "Receiver": in U.S. Bankruptcy. See:
(Reorganization Plan No. 26), (5 U.S.C.A 903), (Public Law 94-564), (legislative History, pg.
5967). The United States went down the road and periodically filed for further Reorganization.”

Did you catch that, the Signatory on the FRN’s, who should be on the hook to We, The
People., as they are the Maker of the “Promissory Note” hold obligations payable to
bearer (i.e.) We, The People, but instead, as just evidenced herein and elsewhere, the
Secretary of the Treasury is now the Receiver in our Nation’s Bankruptcy… which
includes the debt of devaluation of the notes, A.K.A. “Inflation”. The maker is the
obligated payer…who also has the obligation of payment to bearer, (i.e.) We, The People,
for the “promissory notes payable to bearer (US) on demand, and WHICH are currently:
PAST DUE AND OWING FOR OUR LABOR, GOODS AND SERVICES.

Therefore, NOTICE has been herein presented to the Defendant(s), both individually and
jointly, of “THREE DAYS GRACE,” or “DAYS OF GRACE,” from date they
received said notice, to wit:
“DAYS OF GRACE. Certain days after the time limited by the bill or note, which the
acceptor or drawer has a right to demand for payment of the bill or note; these days were
so called because they were formerly gratuitously allowed, but now, by the custom of
merchants, sanctioned by decisions of courts of justice, they are demandable of right. 6
Watts & Serg. 179. The number of these in the United States is generally three. Chitty on
Bills, h.t. But where the established usage of the where the instrument is payable, or of
the bank at which it is payable, or deposited for collection, be to make the demand on the
fourth or other day, the parties to the note will be bound by such usage. 5 How. U. S. Rep.
317; 1 Smith, Lead. Cas. 417. When the last day of grace happens on the 4th of July; 2
Caines Cas. in Err. 195; or on Sunday; 2 Caines' R. 343; 7 Wend. 460; the demand must
be made on the day previous. 13 John. 470; 7 Wend. 460; 12 Mass. 89; 6 Pick. 80; 2
Caines, 343: 2 McCord, 436. But see 2 Conn. 69. See 20 Wend. 205; 1 Metc. R. 43; 2 Cain.
Cas. 195; 7 How. Miss. R. 129; 4 J. J. Marsh. 332; (also see: Bouvier’s Law Dictionary –
Revised 6th Ed. 1856)

So, how is it that the “Secretary of Treasury” is now “the receiver” in and of our
National Debt/Bankruptcy, which everything We, The People own, both, tangible and
intangible, have all been pledged in promise to pay? i.e. The Nation’s National Debt,
which includes the full amount of all funds alleged forgiven in every bankruptcy case
filed in the U.S.. Furthermore, upon forgiveness, the entire amount forgiven is added to
the debt of all the people, (i.e. our National Debt).

This Includes the ones previously forgiven for the debt, but in this manner, it is double
jeopardy on them and all jeopardy on all the rest who had nothing to do with the creation
of those bankruptcy debts, yet they are held liable, with no real nexus Connection on the
liabilities heaped upon the people.

52
Not to mention the fact that the highest Bankruptcy filing(s) and default(s) are not by We,
The People, but rather by, State Sanctioned and Chartered Corporations, or Foreign
Corporations whose alleged misspending of money not in hand, is bad enough. But
misappropriated funds and loans, to be removed from their creators signatures and
guarantees and whom enjoyed the funds, and their lifestyles, corporate bonusses, cash
pay merit awards, cash pay incentive pay, et al.; and for which were certainly enjoyed by
them, enjoyed while paying themselves with funds which they knew would never be
collected and therefore, never repaid to the banks and financial institutions.

Not by them anyways, but rather, by their throwing said burdens off the companies and
themselves, (a artificial entity) and slap it on the innocent backs of the Living, Breathing
innocent entity, a real sentient human being. It is wrong to throw burdens on those who
had no part in the creation of said burdens., nor did they receive the benefit.

It makes them and all their future posterity, that shell come after them, will be life-long
indentured and institutional slave labor units, as capitalized upon by the city and state
who also get loans by promising the future Human Capital of its citizens, i.e. which is to
say, their future human output of Natural Energy Sources. The people are being pledged
like cattle, for their future outputs of their National Energy Sources, as if they are
rechargeable batteries being pledged to provide future natural energy sources!!!

This is all being done, absent required and mandatory disclosure of all the pertinent facts,
duties and obligations of all the parties involved. That is called a Quasi Contractual
Obligation, which may be refuted at any time so as to throw off such undisclosed
Constructive Fraud.

It is unethical and immoral to throw such burdens on those innocent lives, who had
nothing to do with creating it, nor did they receive any benefits therefrom, nor even told
that now they are liable for somebody else’s Debt Obligations, failures,
misappropriations and the like??? That is criminal and it violates every law on earth
pertaining to the obligations of contracts, money, equity, or the like. It is a massive
Fraudulent Money Scheme and moreover, it is ECONOMIC WARFARE upon the unsuspecting
general public at large.

The Obligations associated with repayment of such debts, should fall back on those
whom created it! The debt should fall back on the people, or corporations whom were
associated in creating the said debt.. That means liability for the full amount Due and
Owing under the said National Debt of the United States of America (U.S.A.).

Besides that, We, The People, do not accept the liabilities associated with a debt that
“NO MATHEMATICAL SOLUTION EXIST FOR IT’S PAYMENT”! This is
precisely why MAXIM’S of Law exist stating as follows:
“NO MAN IS BOUND TO AN IMPOSSABILITY UNDER THE LAW”

And now, let US define exactly, what Federal Reserve Notes actually are, to wit:

53
 “FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES. Form of currency issued by Federal Reserve Banks in the
likeness of noninterest bearing promissory note payable to bearer on demand. The federal
reserve note (e.g. one, five, ten, etc. dollar bill) is the most widely used paper currency. Such
have replaced silver and gold certificates which were backed by silver and gold. Such reserve
notes are direct obligations of the United States.

And, take notice of terms used above, to wit:

“(e.g. one, five, ten, etc. dollar bill)”

Now, the word to describe the ones, fives, tens, etc. are “Dollar Bills”, which has a
specific legal meaning also, pursuant to the U.S. Constitution, “Dollar” means “Gold
and Silver Coins only”, and goes further and actually states that it “prohibits the use of
paper as a legal tender”. Therefore, it is highly misleading, deceptive, coercive, trickery
and a form of hypnotism, via powerful suggestion, that the definition above used the
term, “Dollar Bills”; while knowing full well, that their continued use of the current
Paper Bills, Notes of Debt Credit, can only qualify as pre-meditated:
“PROMISSORY FRAUD. A promise to perform made at a time when the promisor has a
present intention not to perform. It is a misrepresentation of the promisor's frame of mind
and is, for that reason a fact which makes it the basis of an action for deceit. It is sometimes
called common law fraud.” (See: BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY 6 th Edition, pg. 1214 –
Published 1990)

This includes, but is not limited to, the devaluation of the Federal Reserve Notes and the
lack of their ability to actually hold the face value, have continually been injected into the
American economy and the economies throughout the whole inhabited earth. This
Constructive Fraud and Theft has been foisted upon the innocent and unaware societies
of the whole inhabited earth.
It should be further noted that this devaluation from the amount of claimed face value,
was, has been; and is now, premeditated criminal RICO Conspiracy and Criminal
Collusion by two (2) or more, with premeditated criminal intent, to knowingly and
intentionally overstate, over evaluate the fraudulently, unethically, immorally,
deceptively, and treacherously continued to make, indorse with their signatures, and then
with no limits to their PERFIDY, they intentionally and wantonly caused the same said
FRN’s to be deceptively marketed wile knowingly and intentionally defrauding
everybody who accepted the same, in good faith, that the said FRN’s were in fact, worth
their marketed, promoted, advertised, then intentionally swore and promised by their
signatures, that they were in fact and in deed, worth the face value claimed by the same.

It is further worthy of note that the Federal Reserve Bank’s Board of Governors, along
with the Secretary of the Treasury (i.e.) Governor of the Fund and the Bank, did, with
unclean hands, and by their fruit of the poisonous tree, did then and continue now, to
knowingly and intentionally cheat, defraud, steal, rob, extort, disfranchise, and/or the
like, while knowing, intentionally and criminally deceive the American people and the
entire societies of the whole inhabited earth. The said federal Reserve Banks acting as

54
the physical and depository agents for the International Monetary Fund and the World
Bank, Bank of International Settlements, (i.e. The Banks and the Fund).

It is worthy of restatement here, that said banks, Boards, Funds, et al; knew the face value
of the same to no longer posses the purchasing power sworn under penalty of perjury, and
the same said parties, continued to cause the same devaluated promissory notes to bare
their signatures, (all the better to crown their frauds with success) which criminal acts,
were and are purposely over valuated upon the faces of their rehypothecated worthless
paper securities known as: “Federal Reserve Joint Promissory Notes”! The same said
criminal parties have continually benefit and financially gain and profit from the loss and
damages suffered by others, which is not allowed in law!

The Secretary of Treasury did then cause the fraudulent Notes to be injected into the
national economy (via a bank loan) and caused to be passed through the whole World’s
economies, and have falsely advertised, marketed and promoted with premeditated
criminal intent to commit an act of theft and extortion via, threat, duress and coercion.
These high crimes are perpetrated upon the whole of the unknowing, by praying on their
ignorance with regards to money, credit, inflation, economic and cyber warfare.

The heinous crimes of defrauding the public records and fraud upon the courts, which
carries no Statute of Limitations for the prosecutions’ of such said heinous crimes, such
as, contract fraud, passing off fraudulent securities for the purposes of defrauding the
general public at large, committing criminal acts, which are destructive by nature.

Furthermore, becoming a Grave Threat and a Grave Danger to the General Public; and to
our entire Society at large; and as a whole with their fraudulently inflated face value; and
over-valuing the devaluated worth, or value in purchasing power. Such undisclosed bad
faith, nullifies the same.

The devaluated high inflation ridden Federal Reserve Notes are nullified as a direct result
of their being OVER-BURDENSOME upon any society forced to use them; and
furthermore, should be nullified for fraud upon their face. The situation regarding such
said two party promissory notes have become TOXIC Asset(s) as stated below, to wit:

“The socio/economic situation worsened as noted in the Complaint/Petition, filed in the (U.S.
Court of Claims Docket No. 41-76), on February 11, 1976, by 44 Federal judges, (Atkins et
al. vs. U.S.). Atkins et al. complained that "As a result of inflation, the compensation of
"federal judges" has been substantially diminished each year since 1969, causing "direct"
and "continuing" monetary harm to plaintiffs...

“The real value of the dollar decreased by approximately 34.5% percent from March 15,
1969 to October 1, 1975... As a result, plaintiffs have suffered an unconstitutional
deprivation of earnings” and in the prayer for relief claimed: "damages for the constitutional
violations enumerated above, measured as the diminution of his earnings for the entire
period since March 9, 1969."

It is quite apparent that the persons holding and enjoying offices of Public Trust, Honor
and or Profit knew of the emergency emergent problem and sought protection for

55
"themselves." To the "damage" and "injury" of the People and Children, who were
classified as:

"A club that has many other members" who "have no remedy." (?)

And knowing that "heinous" acts had been committed, stated that they (judges/lawyers)
would not apply the Law, nor would any substantive remedy be applied (checked more or
less, but never stopped), "until all of us "judges" are dead."
“Atkins v. U.S., 556 F.2d 1028 (Ct. Cl. 1977), was an unsuccessful attempt to force the
Government to address the destructive effect of inflation on the judiciary during the period
1969 - 1975, when the value of the dollar, measured by the Consumer Price Index, decreased
by 34%, and Congress failed to provide increases to protect judges' purchasing power.”

and…
“The Federalist No. 79, at 491-492 (Alexander Hamilton) (Clinton Rossiter ed., 1961). The
wisdom of our founding fathers is borne out by history; since 1969, the base date currently
used by the judiciary, inflation has increased by 344% in the aggregate. In the general salary
increases Congress has seen fit to grant the judiciary in the years since 1983 , there is nothing
to suggest that the congressional purpose was to make whole the losses sustained by the pre-
1983 judges resulting from the unconstitutional imposition of the tax at issue in this case. On
the contrary, everything in the record and the legislative history makes clear that these
increases were in response to continued concerns expressed in Congress, within the judiciary
itself, in the bar, as well as among segments of the informed public, concerns for the well-
being and continued vitality of the federal judiciary if the slide in purchasing power
resulting from continued and unadjusted-for inflation was not halted.10”

Now tell me about the ”profits” ignorantly claimed to have been made, by “Tax Payers,”
because nobody is making profits, when you need 344% more than those worthless Paper
Securities known as Federal Reserve Notes, just to make one (1) single Federal Reserve
Note worth the value that continues to be fraudulently claimed upon its face… If one
spoke honestly, the people would actually be better off not working, because the more
notes they accept, the higher their national debt. Which has already been admitted on
the records of this nation, “to have no mathematical solution!”

It should be further noted that if one figure the inflation level on any amount of money
(credit via notes), from the creation of the Federal Reserve Banks and their Emergency
Military Transcript, calculating from 1913 (date of creation of the FRN’s) to the present
day, by going to the “Online Inflation Calculator”, one will find that the said FRN’s have
devaluated by 2,372.1 %. (See: http://www.usinflationcalculator.com )

The bonds, debentures, notes, certificates, securities, warrants, checks and other
evidences of debt issued by or in behalf of their profligate inter-agency operations
became “worthless securities” as a matter of law and by qualification by definition.

These Worthless Securities can be written off with the IRS, as shown herein. But what
else can these Worthless Securities be considered?

56
That is correct, they are also “Toxic Assets” with regards to one’s investment portfolios;
and that is something which all investors try to avoid the financial devastation of… which
is to say, never get caught holding “Toxic Assets”, when the music of the Pied Pipers
stops playing!

https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.istockphoto.com%2Fphotos%2Ftoxic-assets-picture-id173608970&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.istockphoto.com%2Fphoto%2Ftoxic-assets-gm173608970-7481546&tbnid=4ylx-

dEfVIMWTM&vet=10CAcQMyhnahcKEwiQvpzZ6bfqAhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg..i&docid=g8PstJWyRuS9IM&w=1024&h=683&itg=1&q=toxic%20assets&hl=en-us&ved=0CAcQMyhnahcKEwiQvpzZ6bfqAhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg

Now, maybe one can better understand why the standard or practice of the Internal
Revenue Service, is based upon voluntary compliance and self assessments! Deception,
failure to disclose all the pertinent facts and obligations to the contract, etc., are the least
of the bad faith acts on the part of the IRS, expecting that Tax Payers Self Assess their
own Tax Burdens? Yet they never disclose the facts, regarding the Federal Reserve
Note’s status as “Worthless Securities”, which one may also file for wright off’s or
deductions pursuant to:

“26 I.R.C. 165q, Worthless securities. – (1) General rule. – If any security which is a capital
asset becomes worthless during the taxable year, the loss resulting therefrom shall, for the
purposes of this subtitle, be treated as a loss from the sale or exchange, on the last day of the
taxable year, of a capital asset.”

“(2) Security defined.

(c) A bond, debenture, note, or certificate, or other evidence of indebtedness, issued by a
corporation or by a government or political subdivision thereof, with interest coupons or in
registered form.”

The War has now come to the Forefront and is already manifesting itself at the front steps
of the said Federal Reserve. The Federal Government is filing UCC Treasury Liens
against the Federal Reserve Banks, et al., to wit:

1) https://www.scribd.com/document/500690025/108601641-252-U-S-Treasury-Forclosing-on-the-Federal-Reserve-Bank

2) https://www.scribd.com/document/500690026/101937790-Federal-Reserve-Heist

3) https://www.scribd.com/document/500690027/67199969-Federal-Reserve-Lien-Ammended-Again

4) https://www.scribd.com/document/500690024/67199426-Us-Treasury-Lien-on-Federal-Reserve

57
Furthermore, even when others lacking knowledge, and not knowing better, they
unknowingly, accept the notes for their face value. They don’t understand that the paper
bills of debt credit, have been fraudulently passed into the economy of their society,
while those creating the notes, knew they were not; and are not worth a fraction of the
fictitious amount of value being fraudulently claimed upon the FRN’s as face values.

Therefore, that doesn’t mean they have that much purchasing power and when the people
and the companies end up going bankrupt as a result of loss of purchasing power of the
FRN’s, finding closed lending windows, then bankruptcy; and their insolvency is merely
added to the insolvent nature of the Nations National Debt. Hence, it does not go away!

Everything (Tangible and Intangible) all property of everybody and of any kind has been
pledged in promise to pay the said National Debt. The problem, or rub, is the parties
named herein and their failure to disclose the pertinent facts and obligations of the parties
to the contract, which is more than grounds for nullifying the contract and the obligations
of the parties to the contract.

and…

“Fraud and justice never agree together.” (See: Wingate's Maxims 680),

and…

“Fraud lurks in generalities.” (See: Trayner's Maxims 162),

and…

“Once a fraud always a fraud.” (See: 13 Viner's Abridgments 537),

and…

“The value of a thing is estimated by its worth in money, and the value of money is not
established by reference to the thing.” (See: 9 Coke's Reports 76; 1 Bouvier's Institutes of
American Law, n.922)

and…

“The laws help persons that are deceived, not those deceiving.” (See: Trayner's Maxims
149),

and…

“Equity never contradicts the Law.” (See: Lofft’s Reports 379)

and…

“Nothing is more unjust than to extend equity too far.” (See: Halkertons’s Digest 103)

58
and…

“What is otherwise good and fair, if sought by force or fraud, becomes bad and unjust.” (See:
Cokes Reports 78),

and…

“Time cannot render valid an act void in it.” (See: Digest of the Civil Law, Book 50, Title
17, and Law 29),

The manner in which bond-slaves were to be controlled was put forth in “The Bankers
Manifest of 1934:

“Capital must protect itself in every way, through combination and through legislation.
Debts must be collected and loans and mortgages foreclosed as soon as possible. When,
through a process of law, the common people have lost their homes, they will be more
tractable and more easily governed by the strong arm of the law, applied by the central
power of wealth, under control of leading financiers. People without homes will not quarrel
with their leaders. This is well known among our principal men now engaged in forming an
imperialism of capital to govern the world. By dividing the people we can get them to
expend their energies in fighting over questions of no importance to us except as teachers of
the common herd.”

Now, therefore, with regards to the debt fraudulently being claimed “Due and Owing” on
the worthless rehypothecated, falsified and fraudulent Securities of the United States and
their fiscal and depository agent, the Federal Reserve Bank, can be summed up in one
statement, which I will also re-state herein, in the Words of my forefathers, even Moses
of old, England and the Pope have been here eating the substance out of this People, who
necessarily have been left to carry the grossly heavy burdens of foreign King(s); and their
OVERLORDS; and all their great Lord(s), Privy(s), Esquire(s), and other Titles of
Nobility and their appointed Authorities over the earth, along with all their failures, to
wit:

“But it was of "the Public" that we were speaking, and I believe that "the Public" first
becomes prominent in connection with the National Debt. Though much might be done for
us by a slightly denaturalized king, he could not do all that was requisite.

Some proceedings of one of his predecessors, who closed the Exchequer and ruined the
goldsmiths, had made our king no good borrower. So the Public had to take his place. The
money might be "advanced to His Majesty", but the Public had to owe it. This idea could not
be kept off the statute book. "Whereas," said an Act of 1786, "the Public stands indebted to"
the East India Company in a sum of four millions and more.

What is the Public which owes the National Debt? We try to evade that question. We try to
think of that debt not as a debt owed by a person, but as a sum charged upon a pledged or
mortgaged thing, upon the Consolidated Fund.

This is natural, for we may, if we will, trace the beginnings of a national debt back to days
when a king borrows money and charges the repayment of it upon a specific tax; perhaps he
will even appoint his creditor to collect that tax, and so enable him to repay himself. Then

59
 there was the long transitional stage in which annuities were charged on the Aggregate
Fund, the General Fund, the South Sea Fund, and so forth.

And now we have the Consolidated Fund; but even the most licentious "objectification" (or,
as Dr James Ward says, "reification") can hardly make that Fund "a thing" for
jurisprudence.

On the one hand, we do not conceive that the holders of Consols would have the slightest
right to complain if the present taxes were swept away and new taxes invented, and, on the
other hand, we conceive that if the present taxes will not suffice to pay the interest of the
debt more taxes must be imposed. Then we speak of "the security of an Act of Parliament",
as if the Act were a profit-bearing thing that could be pledged. Or we introduce "the
Government" as a debtor.

But what, we may ask, is this Government? Surely not the group of Ministers, not the
Government which can be contrasted with Parliament. I am happy to think that no words of
mine can affect the price of Bank Annuities, but it seems to me that the national debt is not a
"secured debt" in any other than that loose sense in which we speak of "personal security",
and that the creator has nothing to trust to but the honesty and solvency of that honest and
solvent community of which the King is the head and "Government" and Parliament are
organs.”

There is also no doubt throughout history that the benefactors are always the King and
Crown in England and its OVERLORD, The Sovereign Pontiff of ROME, to wit:

“Then, on the other hand, medieval thought conceived the nation as a community and
pictured it as a body of which the king was the head. It resembled those smaller bodies
which it comprised and of which it was in some sort composed. What we should regard as
the contrast between State and Corporation was hardly visible.

The “commune of the realm” differed rather in size and power than in essence from the
commune of a county or the commune of a borough. And as the comitatus or county took
visible form in the comitatus or county court, so the realm took visible form in a parliament.
“Every one”, said Thorpe C.J. in 1365, “is bound to know at once what is done in
Parliament, for Parliament represents the body of the whole realm.”

“For a time it seems very possible, as we read the Year Books, that so soon as lawyers begin
to argue about the nature of corporations or bodies politic and clearly to sever the Borough,
for example, from the sum of burgesses, they will definitely grasp and formulate the very
sound thought that the realm is “a corporation aggregate of many”.”

“In 1522 Fineux C.J. after telling how some corporations are made by the king, others by the
pope, others by both king and pope, adds that there are corporations by the common law,
for, says he, “the parliament of the king and the lords and the commons are a corporation.”
What is still lacking is the admission that the corporate realm, besides being the wielder of
public power, may also be the “subject” of private rights, the owner of lands and chattels.
And this is the step that we have never yet formally taken.”

The portrait that Henry VIII painted of the body politic of which he was the sovereign
head will not be forgotten:
 
“Where by divers sundry old authentic histories and chronicles it is manifestly declared and
expressed that this realm of England is an Empire, and so hath been accepted in the world,

60
 governed by one supreme Head and King, having the dignity and royal estate of the Imperial
Crown of the same, unto whom a Body Politick, compact of all sorts and degrees of people
and by names of Spirituality and Temporality been bounden, and owen to bear, next to God,
a natural and humble obedience...” (See: F.W. Maitland, 17 L. Q. R. 131, 136, et al)

My authority for speaking herein is “By the Right of Blood” (Jus Sanguineous), I AM
Come to bring an END to this HOLY WAR. (See: I Refuse: https://youtu.be/BMOcXu-JheA )
An Un-Declared, Un-lawfully waged Ruthless and Relentless PSYCHOLOGICAL
WARFARE, ECONOMIC WARFARE, CYBER WARFARE, SOBOTAGE,
TARGETTED MURDERS, BY THE KILL LIST, STATE SPONSORED TERRORISM,
and the like upon US (We The People) of this Nation.

This criminal occupation, International Criminal Syndicate, Terrorist Organization, by

the King(s)/Queen(s) of England/Britain and the HOLY SEE (Agent and Principle). This
evidences their Treachery and Perfidy even further. But on Saturday, the very next day,
after British General Cornwallis surrendered and We, the People won our Freedoms in
America! (i.e.) AT THE BATTLE/SIEGE OF YORKTOWN!

The HOLY WAR began on US, the moment that we supposedly won our freedoms and
our liberties, after our American victory at the Battle of Yorktown. Some say, it actually
began on the following day. The Battle/Siege of Yorktown ended the Revolutionary
War; and started the Quiet War, or HOLY WAR, to be fought with Silent Subjective
Weapons/Psychological and Joint Economic Warfare being used in the latter.

That, in reality, is when the first Quiet War was declared, causing our essential engine, to
Silently fall and the British Empire (One Head) and the Roman Empire (Second Head)
Silently became the new “OCCUPYING BELIGERENT(S)”, or two headed beast, raging
over US and our Lands.

Today, it is said that England has waged a quiet war against US using Silent Weapons
Systems. It is also said that via a Silent British Sack, the American Nation has long ago
fallen, in defeat to the same Tyrant titled: King of Britain, which we believed had fallen
on that historical day, i.e., Friday, October 19, 1789 at the “Siege of Yorktown” is
diverting the wealth of the people of this nation, under the guise of past Treaties of
Peace, which are of themselves, but further evidence of the Treachery and Perfidy
(Prohibited as War Crimes and as Grave Breaches under the U.N. Charter).

To follow, herein is a moment-by-moment, detailed analysis of exactly how and when

England has done this and committed the Treacherous Acts and Perfidy, under guise of a
“HOLY WAR” Declared upon America! (But was Un-Declared to the American
Public, who to this day, has no knowledge, or understanding they are being subdued by a
Silent Weapon being used in a Quiet Economic War, Silently Declared upon them under
guise of a HOLY WAR, which has be silently, yet violently waged upon them, for over
200 years now)!

My intent is that God’s statutes and judgments be executed in the land (See: PL 97-280),
that the debtor be restored his pledge (Ezek 18:1-32) so that justice with mercy (better to

61
err on the side of mercy) can prevail. Equity as the way of the Lord is equal; and our
ways are not. Be not deceived; God is not mocked (Gal 6:7). Job understood this very
problem in his time (Job 9: ), Eliphaz understood the language of the crafty (Job 15:1-6),
one can’t plead with God as a man pleads with his neighbor.

When I have no remedy or recourse, I must put my faith in Him, who instructed my
forefather’s (Israel of old), even Moses in the name of that God who sent him saying:
“LET MY PEOPLE GO!”

And My God said:

“Tell them “I AM THAT I AM” is the name of the One who hath sent you!”

With regards to Sovereignty, they depended highly upon the Law of Nations as a guide of
what is fair and right, along with that which is wrong. In the Law of Nations, Vattel
states:

“If he (the sovereign) puts justice and duty first, if he aspires to the lofty and immortal
honor of being the father of his people, let him distrust the selfish suggestions of the minister
who represents to him as rebels all citizens who do not hold out their hands to the chains of
slavery and who refuse to bow without a murmur under the rod of a despotic rule .” Vetted,
Book III, § 290

and…
“The surest method of appeasing seditions, and at the same time the most just one, is to
satisfy the grievances of the people! If they have revolted without cause, which perhaps is
never the case, …” Vattel, Book III § 291

“The fact of having entered into civil society does not bind one to follow its lot when it
dissolves itself in order to be subject to foreign control. . . We owe it obedience so long as it
remains a body politic; when it divest itself of that character and receives the law of another
state it breaks the bonds which unite its members and releases them from their
engagements.” Vattel, Book I, § 184

The record clearly shows that the deception is planned to mislead and cause confusion
and strife so that the people can be plundered without their understanding of what is
really going on. Vattel, in Book III, ch. 12, § 188, clearly states that under the law of
nations:

“an unjust war can give rise to no legal rights, no certain possession can be obtained of any
property captured…such property will always be subject to a claim for recovery, as in the
case of goods stolen by robbers.”

62
 THE AB’S DESTROY THE UNITED STATES via INFLATION
Therefore, We, The People having no knowledge (By Military design & Admission) and
We, The People and Civilian Population(s) of America have been and are now, being
governed by Foreign Military Occupying Belligerent(s)” and their Commander(s). Nor
were we notified that We, The People are currently being Occupied by a Foreign Alien
Enemy Criminal Belligerent and War Criminal, nor that as such (We, The People), are
currently under the sole care, custody and control of a Foreign Enemy Occupation and it
is without any doubt a Criminal COMMUNIST Occupying Belligerent Power.

The “Bank” clothed with EMERGENCY WAR POWERS now enslaves US with
Fraudulent, Rehypothecated, High Inflation Ridden, Devalued debt instruments,
Toxic Assets and Worthless Securities of the United States. The Paper Bills of Debt
Credit are torturously over-burdensome upon the society forced to use them and I
am about to show you how to prove it using their own systems, etc., to do so!

Remember what was just shown to you above. The AB’s of London and New York
are the source of all our problems for this has been identified and is already known.
The Problem or Emergency, if you will, is a direct result of “INFLATION”.

So, we already know and have positively identified the culprit, which is causing the
devaluation and loss of our currency’s purchasing power. The current inflationary
levels of the Federal Reserve Notes (F.R.N.’s), have been documented and those
inflationary levels, as of 1999, were over 344%! In fact, the devaluation goes
MUCH HIGHER as just shown above, currently devaluated by 2,372.1%.
(See: http://www.usinflationcalculator.com )!!!

63
The devaluated Two-Party Paper Notes of Worthless Debt Credit must be removed
from circulation. As such, the notes can no longer lawfully be used pursuant to the
Laws of Equity and therefore, no longer qualifies as a lawful currency.

If by nobody else, then the military must remove this Paper currency from the
public’s continued use, to their own economic ruin. If there is not yet another
lawful currency in place to replace the FRN’s with, then the U.S. Military Civil
Affairs Commander must step in and force both, the public and the Government
Banks to exchange the worthless/valueless FRN’s for the New U.S. Military
Transcripts!

The below chart shows clarification for everybody, both, historically and
economically, exactly why the FRN’s should be seized out of circulation and/or
mandatorily exchanged for a New temporary U.S. Military Transcripts. As such,
they are now deemed “Worthless Securities”.
The bonds, debentures, notes, certificates, securities, warrants, checks and other
evidences of debt issued by or in behalf of their profligate inter-agency operations
became “worthless securities” as a matter of law and by qualification by definition.

https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.istockphoto.com%2Fphotos%2Ftoxic-assets-picture-id173608970&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.istockphoto.com%2Fphoto%2Ftoxic-assets-gm173608970-7481546&tbnid=4ylx-

dEfVIMWTM&vet=10CAcQMyhnahcKEwiQvpzZ6bfqAhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg..i&docid=g8PstJWyRuS9IM&w=1024&h=683&itg=1&q=toxic%20assets&hl=en-us&ved=0CAcQMyhnahcKEwiQvpzZ6bfqAhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg

“26 I.R.C. 165q, Worthless securities. – (1) General rule. – If any security which is a capital
asset becomes worthless during the taxable year, the loss resulting therefrom shall, for the
purposes of this subtitle, be treated as a loss from the sale or exchange, on the last day of the
taxable year, of a capital asset.”

(2) Security defined.

(c) A bond, debenture, note, or certificate, or other evidence of indebtedness, issued by a
corporation or by a government or political subdivision thereof, with interest coupons or in
registered form.”

Now on another note, with regards to the FRN’s and their value as it applies to the IRS. I
am speaking about Title 26 of the US Code is the Internal Revenue Code. In Sections
1271-1275 deal with assessing a tax on debt instruments. Section 1275 defines debt
instrument as follows:

“26 USC §1275(a)(1)(A)

Except as provided for in paragraph (B), the term “debt instrument” means a bond,
debenture, note or certificate of other evidence of indebtedness.

64
Now, those Federal Reserve Notes (FRN’s) which we all trade as money are, by this
definition “Debt Instruments”. Now that we know the status of our money, let us look at
Section 1274, to wit:
“26 USC §1274(3)(D)
(3) Exceptions
This Section shall not apply to –
(D) Debt instruments which are publicly traded or issued for publicly traded property.

There is no doubt, nor debate, that our money/FRN’s are two party notes and are “Debt
Instruments” that are publicly traded and issued for publicly traded property. Therefore,
it appears to be excluded from taxation pursuant to these rules in the Internal Revenue
Code.

Below is a chart which shows the purchasing power being eaten away from 1913-2019
and further evidences the fact that the Federal Reserve Notes, without argument, have
become worthless securities and debt instruments as defined in the Internal Revenue
Code, to wit:

Such a forced surrender or exchange of the said current FRN’s for temporary U.S.
Military Transcript is the only way to begin and the only place to start. Because, at
present, our people are held liable, and pledged as the Human Resources/Collateral
(Pledged Surety or property) for future natural energy output, on the impossible to
pay debts, created by the current worthless paper bills of debt credit, which has
been claimed, due and owing! Because we accepted and used their worthless paper
Notes/bills of debt credit?) (See: https://www.scribd.com/document/427757757/Inflation-on-Federal-Reserve-Notes )

In this research, which I have gathered with respect to the FRN’s huge LOSSES of
purchasing power, directly due to devaluation as a direct result of Inflation. All of the
said research has been documented and linked herein for your convenience. When
reviewing the said research, you will see the numbers for how many pensions,
retirements, etc., damned near all of which, ARE NOT FUNDED! To quote Ron
Paul’s speech to Congress when introducing his bill (H. R. 1207) to audit the Federal
Reserve System, stated the following:

65
 “Throughout its nearly 100-year history, the Federal Reserve has presided over the near-
complete destruction of the United States dollar. Since 1913 the dollar has lost over 95% of its
purchasing power, aided and abetted by the Federal Reserve’s loose monetary policy. [….] The
Federal Reserve can enter into agreements with foreign central banks and foreign
governments, and the GAO is prohibited from auditing or even seeing these agreements. Why
should a government-established agency, whose police force has federal law enforcement
powers, and whose notes have legal tender status in this country, be allowed to enter into
agreements with foreign powers and foreign banking institutions with no oversight? […] If the
State Department were able to do this, it would be characterized as a rogue agency and brought
to heel, and if a private individual did this, he might face prosecution under the Logan Act, yet
the Fed avoids both fates.”

Bloomberg put out the following chart titled “Hockey Stick Inflation based upon the
Consumer Price Index 1775-2012, showing the true reality of the Federal Reserve based
inflation from the date of its creation by law in 1913 until 2012:

The factual truth regarding this matter, is that ALL of the people’s life savings,
their retirements, their 401k’s, their stock options, their bonds, et al., are all about
to be gone! In Fact, according to McKinsey, the consulting firm based in New York, the
fragility of these financial institutions is because of the low-interest-rate environment and
the concerns for growth forecasts said this week:

“Nearly one out of every three banking establishments in the world is likely to go out of
business in the coming months.  This is the conclusion without doubt by McKinsey in a study
revealed on Monday by Les Echos. The consulting firm, which looked at the situation of
1000 banks in the world, estimates more precisely that 354 establishments are threatened
with extinction in a couple of months.”
(See: 7bitcoins.com;  https://7bitcoins.com/one-in-three-banks-threatened-to-disappear-in-the-coming-months/ )

and…

66
 Average Annual Inflation by Decade
“The Chart below shows the Annual Inflation Rates for each decade. Each bar represents the
average Annual Inflation for that decade (not the total cumulative inflation for that 10-year period
but how much it increased each year on average during that decade). 

The final Yellow bar shows the average annual inflation rate since the government began tracking
it in 1913.”

Click for Larger Image

“If we look at the cumulative inflation for the entire decade we can see that only two decades
had prices that fell for the entire decade and that was the 1920's and the 1930's. The 30's you
would expect because of the great depression but prices actually fell during the "roaring
twenties"? Yes, even though the 20's were wild and crazy and immortalized by F. Scott
Fitzgerald's classic novel, The Great Gatsby not everyone participated in the boom. The vast
majority of Americans lived on farms and from 1920 to 1921, the price of wheat, the major
crop of mid-west farmers, lost almost half its value. Cotton, the lifeblood of Southern
farmers, lost three-quarters of its value. Thus, the farms themselves lost 50% of their value
since you would have to be crazy to want to buy a farm under those conditions. In addition,
the supply of farms for sale increased because farmers were being foreclosed on because
they couldn't pay off the loans, they made on those "newfangled" tractors. Although it is
possible that those same tractors were the cause of the increase in the production of wheat
and thus the fall in the price. A possibly bigger factor was the government, which offered
farmers a $2 per bushel price subsidy in an effort to supply Europe with wheat during WWI
but when the war ended the subsidy drastically encouraged over production.”

67
And…

“As we saw the Average annual inflation rate is 3.22%. That doesn't sound too bad until we
realize that at that rate prices will double every 20 years. 

That means that every two bars on average prices have doubled or about 5 doublings since they
began keeping records. 

Since, 5 x 2 = 10, Five doublings sound like maybe prices increased by 10 times, right? Or they
are ten times as big as they were in 1913. At the bottom line, what the people are actually paying
as a result of inflation, according to the single authority established by the cases which began with
44 Federal Judges, was that the Consumer Pricing Index would be their recognized source for
tracking “Inflation” and when one goes to the online Consumer Pricing Index and investigates this
matter, they are shown the real level of inflation and devaluation (i.e.) LOST PURCHASING
POWER, in reality, has surpassed:
“2,275% Inflation!”
But it gets much worse than that! Because it isn't just an arithmetic doubling it is a
compounding. So just as compound interest can multiply your savings, compound

68
inflation can multiply the effects of inflation.  As you can see from the cumulative
Inflation chart since 1913, we have seen 2,275% inflation. 

Yes, that is right Two Thousand Two Hundred Seventy-Five percent inflation.
It is difficult to wrap your mind around 2,275% inflation. But that means that prices
increased by 2,275% or they cost 22 times more and these numbers were the 2013
numbers, to wit: 

Click for Larger Image

“When inflation is in the single or double digits this concept is easier to follow. For example,
from January 2005 to January 2006 there was 3.99% inflation. That means that something
that cost $100 in January 2005 would cost $103.99 in January 2006.

In other words, you add the increase due to inflation to the original amount.   So, if we have
2275% inflation, something that cost $100 in 1914 would cost $2375 now. (The original $100
+ $2275 inflation). Something that cost $100 in 1914 would cost $2,375 now, or
higher!

Example prices: The Model T was first produced in 1913 and sold for $575.  Ford
continued to produce the same model until 1927. By 1927 however through mass
production Ford was able to reduce the price of a Model T to $290.  In 1927 Ford

69
introduced the Model A which ranged from $385 for a roadster to $570 for the top-of-
the-line Ford. In 2012 the MSRP for a Ford Fiesta was $13,995.

Using our previous formula or you can plug these numbers into our "How Much Would it
cost Calculator":
 
$575 starting price + 2,261% inflation and you get $13,575 which is amazingly close
to the actual price of the Ford Fiesta but today you would get the bottom of the line
rather than the top of the line for that price! But to be fair although the 1927 Ford or was
top of the line and had much more metal than today’s cars it didn't have "antilock brakes,
stereo sound systems, GPS tracking systems, On-Star, Airbags (or even seatbelts),
Automatic Transmissions, Air-Conditioning etc.
It's possible that even windshield wipers were optional in 1927.

You can plug these numbers yourself into our "How Much Would it cost Calculator"
which is on the same page as our Cumulative Inflation Calculator.

So whenever someone mentions 3% inflation as being low remember

compound interest can work for you... but compound inflation can work against you too! 
 Inflation and Consumer Price Index- Decade Commentary
 https://inflationdata.com/articles/inflation-consumer-price-index-decade-commentary/
 Inflation and CPI 1913-1919
 https://inflationdata.com/articles/inflation-consumer-price-index-decade-commentary/inflation-cpi-consumer-price-index-1920-1929/
 Inflation and CPI 1920-1929
 https://inflationdata.com/articles/inflation-consumer-price-index-decade-commentary/inflation-cpi-consumer-price-index-1920-1929/
 Inflation and CPI 1930-1939
 https://inflationdata.com/articles/inflation-cpi-consumer-price-index-1930-1939/
 Inflation and CPI 1940-1949
 https://inflationdata.com/articles/inflation-consumer-price-index-decade-commentary/inflation-cpi-consumer-price-index-1940-1949/
 Inflation and CPI 1950-1959
 https://inflationdata.com/articles/inflation-cpi-consumer-price-index-1950-1959/
 Inflation and CPI 1960-1969
 https://inflationdata.com/articles/inflation-cpi-consumer-price-index-1960-1969/
 Inflation and CPI 1970-1979
 https://inflationdata.com/articles/inflation-cpi-consumer-price-index-1970-1979/
 Inflation and CPI 1980-1989
 https://inflationdata.com/articles/inflation-cpi-consumer-price-index-1980-1989/

Another good chart showing us an example of the National Debt from 1940 to the present
shows the TRILLIONS owed, to wit:

70
If one would like to see how much and for how long and by whom all these financial
shenanigans have been taking place, then the reader should also take note of the World
Military photos on the Churches own Website:
(See: https://www.gettyimages.com/photos/army-soldier-photos?family=editorial&phrase=army%20soldier%20photos&sort=best#license );

This is all further evidence that there is in fact, a huge and grand conspiracy, it is a
financial conspiracy, it is a theft and is Babylonian magic as a means to plunder. I have
been told that my actions attacking my own Nations money system is to attack myself!
My reply to them is as follows. To imagine I am attacking my own nations money
system tells me that they have yet to see the peoples realities. In that when an entity is
forced to defend themselves from the unlawful attacks, by criminal belligerent’s, ex
patriots and foreign agents, whose attacks, abuse of powers and authorities, acting
without specific delegated powers and authorities, cannot be turned around as if The
People themselves are the Threats and the Aggressors.

The People of Colorado have never authorized any branch of government, rather
Constitutionally, or otherwise to turn on its creators, as if the agent is greater than the
Principal. An absurdity under the law of Principal and Agent or agency. It is all the utter
most insanity, harm, damage, injury, at all levels applicable, to wrongly plunder the Civil
Society and General Population At Large, including, but not limited to, The People of
The State of Colorado; and THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
for seditious Association and Treasonous attacks and Acts of Overthrow of the essential
engine, by becoming traitorous to and committing traitorous Acts, Attacks, and the like,
upon the very ones they swore an oath to protect and defend.

71
Furthermore, the said Officers, Agents, Clerks, Employees, Contractors and servant
underlings have and continue to act with reckless and wonton disregard for the rights, the
lives, the safety, nor superior authority of The People of Colorado, nor the limitations
upon their official authority, or the lack thereof, or the lack of authority to act. The said
personnel have proven to be, by their actions, omission’s and admissions to be willful,
reckless and in wonton disregard for the limitations placed upon their powers &
authorities.

In fact, those within CDOR have already proven, by both, action and word, to be
hedonistic and in reckless and wonton disregard for the limitations upon their delegated
powers and authorities; and for other High Crimes and misdemeanors. For wrongfully
targeting The People of Colorado, whom they know are not engaged in any taxable
activities, nor licensed in a taxable Trade, or Business under the Colorado Revised
Statutes, but fraudulently and wrongfully attempt to collect a debt, or collect a Tax,
which they know is not owed is fraud and extortion. However, when they sent it through
the U.S. Mail, they added postal fraud to the counts of their indictments, for the crimes
they have committed against the Rights, the Lives, the Property; and our money is our
property; and against the Peace, the Safety and the Physical and Mental wellbeing of
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO; and THE PEOPLE OF THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

WHEREFORE, THE FACTS AND THE EVIDENCE can never be turned around, nor
misconstrued, with regards to who attacked/struck first, nor who was on the offensive;
and who was on the Defensive side of all the seditious acts of RICO criminal conspiracy
and seditious association. Such evidence is already a matter of record, regardless as to
what degree or level those personnel fall under, they are under the umbrella of DORA
and that does not take away from the herein Respondent, his God given right, nor
Respondent’s Rights as a natural borne free white man, nor from exercising ones natural
borne rights of self defense, as recognized by all, Military Law, Civil laws and the Law
of God.
(See: Not Gonna Die - https://youtu.be/njJ7NZMH70M )

The Right of Self Defense of one’s life, one’s Liberty, One’s safety, one’s pursuit of
happiness and the like, which God granted to all the creatures of God’s creation, but
when attacked and their lives and safeties are at risk resulting from unlawful attacks, or
threat of attacks from taking place upon themselves and/or their families, they are
justified in their defense. With the war being waged upon the people; and so many
having not yet recognized the attacks as such, then for those of us who do, we have a
greater obligation to stand up, speak out and to STOP and/or PREVENT such seditious
attack’s, both for them and for ourselves!

Therefore, the beast should have not come home to devour its own; and moreover,
should have known better than to imagine it could cross that line in war, seditiously
turning on your own; and to bite the hand that feeds them; and even worse yet, and their
treachery and perfidy cannot be denied when one department draws in a target so that at
just the right time, the other Department may conduct their strike. Thus, further
evidencing their perfidy and treacherous attacks and then treacherously claims a State

72
Income Tax is past due and owing, when: 1) there is no participation in any Taxable
activities, 2) there are no Federal Income Tax Debts in any taxable activities. At the end
of the day, FRN’s are in fact, “Worthless Securities” and are also, unfortunately, the
World Reserve Currency for approximately 80 years now.

US INFLATION RATE SINCE 1914

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/49/Inflation_federal_funds_rate.png

and…

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS
https://www.bls.gov/bls/glossary.htm

and…

US NATIONAL DEBT CLOCK: REAL TIME U.S. NATIONAL DEBT CLOCK

https://usdebtclock.org/

So, let us now consider some of the facts officially documented pursuant to the U.S. Debt
Clock. As one will notice, as we are going through the facts and records being
documented and updated in “Real Time”, many of the facts and figures being
documented are absolutely terrifying. We say terrifying because when one factors the
percentages and tabulates the numbers… and when factoring those calculations over a
period of time, one may finally arrive at and even find the answer which they have been

73
searching for. When one finds that answer, they also find the exact time of it being
revealed… when it is no longer concealed, but rather, has been awaiting its designated
time… time of occurring in the future; and that future, IS HERE & NOW!

The US Debt Clock says that the US Population is 329,707,516 million people

The US Debt Clock says that 158,034,095 million of those people are in the US
workforce

The US Debt Clock says that 6,033,497 million of those people are officially
unemployed

The US Debt Clock says that 11,790,647 million of those people are actually
unemployed

The US Debt Clock says that 37,322,098 millions of those people live in poverty

The US Debt Clock says that 35,497,150 million of those people can no longer feed
themselves and are therefore Food Stamp Recipients

The US Debt Clock says that 742,144 million of those people have been dissolved in
Bankruptcy

The US Debt Clock says that 544,177 million of those people are Homeless

The US Debt Clock says that 53,799,764 million of those people are retired

The US Debt Clock says that 10,006,692 million of those people are disabled

The US Debt Clock says that 119.65% of total Debt to GDP ratio

The US Debt Clock says that the US has a Debt to Wealth Ratio of $966 to $1

The US Debt Clock says that $6,770,424,500,000 Trillion$ of unfunded Pension

Liability

On October 30, 2019 a widely known publication known as Market Watch published a
report, which stated in part,

“The largest public pension funds have over $1 trillion in aggregate

unfunded liabilities.“ (See: https://www.marketwatch.com/story/low-interest-rates-are-
compounding-the-big-problems-facing-pension-funds-2019-08-30 )

The intention here is to show how critical mass had been reached, just months prior to the
February 20, 2020 World Market Crash. By early March 2020, just weeks later, the
COVID-19 Pandemic was announced… hmmm.

74
The Federal Reserve Bank, but moreover, the U.S. Treasury knows these numbers; and
that multiple reporting entities are reporting the same thing. Therefore, there are no
major disputes amongst those experts reporting the facts and figures.

Another very informative publisher known as “the balance” published reports dated July
11, 2019 showing, among other things that:

“The U.S. budget deficit by year is how much more the federal government spends than it
receives in revenue annually. The Fiscal Year 2020 U.S. budget deficit is expected to be $1.1
trillion. That's the largest deficit since 2012.”

The US Debt Clock says that $1,017,186,500,000 Trillion Dollar$ of official US Federal
Budget Deficit, but that the actual number is $1,154,512,000,000 Trillion Dollar$ more
that the federal government spends than it receives in revenue annually.

Allow me to cite the meaning of what Budget Deficit means, to wit:

“A budget deficit typically occurs when expenditures exceed revenue. The term is typically
used to refer to government spending and national debt. A budget deficit is an indicator of
financial health.” (See: www.investopedia.com/terms/b/budget-deficit.asp )

The below graph shows the gravity of what is being said here.

Now, we see that Janet Yellen, (The Secretary of Treasury and Governor of The
International Monetary Fund (I.M.F.) recently stated in an article titled: “‘A natural way
to diversify’: Janet Yellen now says Americans should anticipate a decline in the USD as
the world's reserve currency — what’s really going on and how can you prepare?”,
stating:

75
 “The U.S. dollar saw an 8% decline in its share of global reserves in 2022 — causing some to
question whether the dollar’s days of dominance are over.
Treasury Secretary Jannet Yellen gave her two cents on the matter of so-called “de-
dollarization” during a congressional hearing in June — stating that no currency currently
exists that could displace the greenback.” (See: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/natural-way-diversify-janet-
yellen-125500087.html )

Now, that is both, an intentional understatement, along with an intentional

misrepresentation and wrongful identification of the current FRN’s, as a “Greenback”,
which her resume certainly confirms that she knows todays FRN’s are not Greenbacks
and she knows that Greenbacks are not the same as todays FRN’s, as her resume clearly
evidences, to wit:

“Janet Louise Yellen (born August 13, 1946) is an American economist serving as the
78th United States secretary of the treasury since January 26, 2021. She previously served as
the 15th chair of the Federal Reserve from 2014 to 2018. She is the first person to hold those
positions having also led the White House Council of Economic Advisers and the first
woman to hold either post. Yellen became the first person in U.S. central bank history to
have served as a Federal Reserve chair (2014–2018), vice chair (2010–2014), district
president (FRB of San Francisco, 2004–2010), Fed governor (1994–1997 and 2010–2018),
and staff economist (1977–1978).”
(See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janet_Yellen#:~:text=Yellen%20became%20the%20first%20person,economist%20 )

and…
“Greenbacks, such as this $5 bill issued in March 1863, were a form of legal tender paper
money created by the Union government to help finance the Civil War.”

and…
“Greenbacks funded about 15% of the war effort but raised inflation rates to 14% in 1862
and 25% in 1863 and 1864. Inflation pushed up the cost of war material and reduced the
welfare of workers, professionals, annuitants, bondholders and others whose incomes did not
keep pace with the higher cost of living.  The chief justice of Wisconsin, for example, needed
to sell assets and obtain bank loans because the state did not raise his salary, fixed at $2,500
in 1857, during the war. 
The new money also initiated debates about the proper anchor for the US monetary system
that permeated national politics into the early 20th century.  The Wonderful Wizard of Oz,
conceived by L. Frank Baum in the 1890s, can be read as an allegory regarding those
debates with the yellow brick road representing gold, Dorothy’s slippers (in the book)
representing silver, and the Emerald City representing greenbacks.”
(See: https://www.moaf.org/exhibits/checks_balances/abraham-lincoln/greenback#:~:text=Greenbacks%2C%20such%20as%20this%20%245,help%20finance%20the%20Civil%20War. )

and…

76
 “As Demand Notes were used to pay duties, they were taken out of circulation. By mid-1863,
about 95% were gone.”
(See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenback_(1860s_money)#:~:text=As%20Demand%20Notes%20were%20used,%2C%20about%2095%25%20were%20gone. )

and…

“Federal Reserve Notes, also United States banknotes, are the currently issued banknotes of the
United States dollar.[1] The United States Bureau of Engraving and Printing produces the notes
under the authority of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913[2] and issues them to the Federal Reserve
Banks at the discretion of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.[2]The Reserve
Banks then circulate the notes to their member banks, [3] at which point they become liabilities of
the Reserve Banks[4] and obligations of the United States.[2]
Federal Reserve Notes are legal tender, with the words "this note is legal tender for all debts,
public and private" printed on each note. [5] The notes are backed by financial assets that the
Federal Reserve Banks pledge as collateral, which are mainly Treasury securities and mortgage
agency securities[6] that they purchase on the open market by fiat payment.”
(See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_Note )

So, why would the current Secretary of Treasury, Janet Yellen be intentionally
referencing a currently which has not legally existed since 1863-1864 at the latest. Then
the current Federal Reserve Notes (FRN’s) could not have existed until on or after the
creation of the Federal Reserve Bank in 1913. Only after the 1913 Federal Reserve Act,
could the current FRN’s have ever, legally existed; and by then, legally speaking,
Greenbacks no longer existed.

Can anybody in government speak straightly anymore, absent all the deception, PSYOPS
and other forms of Military Economic WARFARE? Therefore, there could be no honest
mistakes regarding the deceptive use and intentional misidentification of the current U.S.
Currency, under the private authority of the Federal Reserve Bank Act; and in short, is a
different currency/bank note/two party promissory note, U.S. Securities, which as seen
herein, have become “Worthless Securities” and are, in fact, an elaborate Ponzi scheme.

NOTICE OF SUBPEONA DUCES TECUM

“subpoena duces tecum

A subpoena duces tecum is a type of subpoena that requires the witness to produce a
document or documents pertinent to a proceeding. From the Latin duces tecum, meaning
"you shall bring with you".
See, e.g., United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974).
See Category: Courts and Procedure

 wex 
o THE LEGAL PROCESS
o courts
o criminal procedure
o civil procedure
o courts and procedure
o wex definitions

and…

77
In the work of another very informative publisher known as “the balance” which actually
breaks the debt down by president, and multiple other categories. They have published
some very informative findings on the National Debt.

If you don’t understand what that means, let me help you. What this is showing, among
many other things, is that the people in the US are economically and factually
DOOMED!

It shows that “THEY” know there is NO MATHIMATICAL SOLUTION, NOR

REMEDY. In short, there is no way to correct it, reverse it, undue it; nor the like. It is
literally GAME OVER!

The State of our Union, medically speaking, is hemorrhaging on the operating table and
nothing but high hopes and as of 9-19-2019 being in need of more life blood to sustain
our critical life-threatening conditions of our state(s) and existence. Wherefore, the
Federal Reserve Bank is injecting approximately SEVENTY FIVE BILLION DOLLAR$
PER DAY into Local Federal Reserve Bank Branches in the several states as a last ditch
effort to attempt a blood transfusion, on a patient who has already bled out. Now the
patient is on artificial life support and in a comma.

“The Federal Reserve added a third dose of liquidity to a vital corner of the funding markets
Sept. 19, helping rates retreat further as investors warn that fresh bouts of stress remain
possible in the weeks ahead.

The New York Fed injected another $75 billion through an overnight repo operation. That
followed a dose of the same size Sept. 18 and $53.2 billion Sept. 17. The operations,
commonplace in pre-financial crisis times, temporarily add cash, with the Fed taking
government securities as collateral. Wall Street bond dealers submitted about $84 billion of
securities for the Sept. 19 Fed action, the most in the three days.” (See:
https://www.ttnews.com/articles/federal-reserve-injects-75-billion-liquidity )

It is said that on or before January 1, 2020 this will all come to a head and that the
ECONOMIC BUBBLE will BURST! Well, It Did!!! It is also said that by the year 2025,
the populations of nations will be reduced drastically and shall take place everywhere.

Everywhere but in the COMMUNIST COUNTRIES anyway! Deagel Forecast

Predicts 81% US Population Reduction By 2025 (See: http://www.deagel.com/country/forecast.aspx )

Now I want to explain how this is likened to being under attack by a multiple headed
wild beast. This is because it comes down upon one from multiple directions and has US
both, coming and going.

Remember the US Debt Clock, is also calculating an unpaid debt from 1913 (The Year
the Federal Reserve Bank received their Charter from the US Government). It says
that the FEDERAL RESERVE UNFUNDED INTEREST SINCE 1913 are nearly $11
Trillion Dollar$ and the tabulations are ongoing and continuing.

78
However, as of 9-26-2019 this unfunded interest had hit and surpassed:
$10,791,525,000,000 Trillion Dollar$. I want to define what unfunded interest/liability
is for you, to wit:

“The unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) comes about because past assumptions

have not been met. Each year, the plan members and sponsor contribute to the normal cost
component of the retirement plan. The employer is also responsible for paying down
the unfunded actuarial liability, which is amortized usually over a 20-year period.”
(See: https://www.houstontx.gov/finance/11_07_2011_FPPTA_ UAL_ Report.pdf )

When the same question was posed to the Department of Finance, they posted Questions
and Answers, which stated:

“FAQs: Unfunded Obligations Question 1: What is considered as an unfunded obligation?

Response: If the Successor Agency (Agency) did not receive the Finance approved amount of
Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) to pay enforceable obligations on a
Recognized Obligations Payment Schedule (ROPS), the Agency may list the unpaid
obligations”
(See: http://dof.ca.gov/Programs/Redevelopment/RDA_Dissolution_QandA/documents/Unfunded_Obligations_FAQ_V081513.pdf )

What I would like to know is why the US Congress would waste so much time and
resources arguing, fighting, spatting, suing, litigating and the like with President Trump?
The Members of Congress have continually, independently, jointly and individually, have
caused the complete paralysis and the complete dysfunctionality of the entire
Administration of the past office of the President, to such an extent, that the office almost
completely ceased to function, and if allowed, caused the same to be completely
dysfunctional in its duties, obligations, operations and the like; and have further failed, in
one of the most desperate hours our Nation as a whole has ever encountered.

From an observer’s standpoint, this has all come about, primarily over their refusal to
allocate a mere five (5) Billion dollars for a badly needed border wall. They have spent so
much of their time and efforts attempting to make the office of the president
dysfunctional, that they completely negated their own offices, duties and obligations with
regards to the Nation and The People, whom NEED A HERO: https://youtu.be/v-
H3zoq83W4?si=pjoUdMPJMuMgomFt .

The members of Congress have neglected their duties, obligations and their failure to
prioritize to such an extent that now the only way to keep their Failures from completely
collapsing like the twin towers upon all Americans, is for the Federal Reserve Bank to
start injecting approximately 75 Billion Dollar$ per day into the local banks of the
nation? So, for the members of Congress to say, or for them to claim in their defense,
that they didn’t see this coming would be an admission of guilt to the charges of Derelict
of duty, which requires at the very least, their removal from office!

Another question I have for the Federal Reserve Bank with regards to all this alleged debt
is as follows. What has the Federal Reserve Bank and its Board Members done with all
the funds, patents, patent right payments for their use, bank accounts, industrial,
commercial and residential properties, gold, silver, stocks, bonds, cash, foreign

79
currencies, paintings, other art, trust, estates, et al.; which was placed in the possession of
the Federal Reserve Bank(s) sole care, custody and control.
A partial list of all these movable and immovable, tangible and intangible assets has been
provided by the National Archives. The declassified release shows the Alien Property
Case Files, of US Seizures of NAZI backed, or associated assets, after WWII. The
seized wealth was and still is unimaginable! (See: https://www.archives.gov/iwg/declassified-
records/rg-131-alien-property/case-files.html ) Because to finance the NAZIS, then betray
them and commit a theft of all their Land Patents, Inventions patents, other Patent
Royalty Rights, et al., is Treachery and Perfidy.

The point with this combined research is this… those whom we think are representing
our best interest, have abandoned US in all reality and are merely “acting” like they are
still with US! They are NOT with US, nor are they for US!!!! They surrendered US and
our Posterities over to a Criminal Cartel of Bank(s)/Banker(s), whom are literally AT
WAR with US!

Castle of Glass
https://youtu.be/ScNNfyq3d_w?t=81

80
 HOW DID WE GET HERE?

Those currently acting in the positions of our government are strictly de facto,
treasonous, seditious, anarchistic, treacherous and perfidious. Therefore, in
order to help one to see it more clearly, I’ll quote the definitions for you below,
but in short, the very definition of “De Facto” is “UNLAWFUL”, to wit:
“De facto government. One that maintains itself by a display of force against the will of the
rightful legal government and is successful, at least temporarily, in overturning the institutions
of the rightful legal government by setting up its own in lieu thereof. Wortham v. Walker, 133
Tex. 255, 128 S.W.2d 1138, 1145.

and…

“De facto judge. A judge who functions under color of authority but whose authority is
defective in some procedural form. Riley v. Bradley, 252 Ala. 282, 41 So.2d 641.

The Colorado Constitution, Article XXIX Ethics in Government, whereby explaining

the intent in Section 1., which states in part:

“Section 1. Purposes and findings.

(1) The people of the state of Colorado hereby find and declare that:
(a) The conduct of public officers, members of the general assembly, local government officials,
and government employees must hold the respect and confidence of the people;
(b) They shall carry out their duties for the benefit of the people of the state;
(c) They shall, therefore, avoid conduct that is in violation of their public trust or that creates a
justifiable impression among members of the public that such trust is being violated;”

The reason why Claimant wants to bring this matter to light, is due to the Counties and
Municipalities HOME RULE exemptions in Section 7 below. This is but further
confirmation regarding the message which the falsely accused is attempting to convey
herein. Primarily to show that while exceptions do exist, those exemptions or exceptions
do not extend to Unincorporated Counties, which have no charter, ordinances, or
resolutions of matters covered by this article.

The exceptions under Section 7, state as follows:

“Section 7. Counties and municipalities.

Any county or municipality may adopt ordinances or charter provisions with respect to ethics
matters that are more stringent than any of the provisions contained in this article. The
requirements of this article shall not apply to home rule counties or home rule municipalities that
have adopted charters, ordinances, or resolutions that address the matters covered by this
article.”

It is nothing short of fruit of the poisonous tree, in violation of the clean hands doctrine.
The officers, agents, employees and the like have no authority under the Police Powers
jurisdiction, nor otherwise,.. in short they are de facto, are unlawful, illegal and wanton.

81
As a direct result of the herein named Respondent(s) RICO Criminal Syndicate
connection pertaining to their highly organized, high powered, high leveled State, all of
which violates “Section 1. Purposes and findings”, and including but not limited to (1)
(c) of the same, which states:

“(c) They shall, therefore, avoid conduct that is in violation of their public trust or that creates
a justifiable impression among members of the public that such trust is being violated;”
(See: https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/ArticleXXIX_IEC.pdf )

“The people of the state of Colorado”, EX REL.; Claimant, James D. Hardin provides
further complaint of prohibited acts under and pursuant to the “Colorado Constitution
Article XXIX Ethics in Government, Section 1. Purposes and findings” and Claimant,
having first hand knowledge and witness/victim experience, hereby states for the record
that the ways, means and practices of same, constitutes conduct:

“…in violation of their public trust or that creates a justifiable impression among members of
the public that such trust is being violated;”

The reasoning is clearly stated in the following definition, to wit:

“50. Treachery or Perfidy 

“Ruses of war are legitimate so long as they do not involve treachery or perfidy on the part of
the belligerent resorting to them. They are, however, forbidden if they contravene any
generally accepted rule. 

The line of demarcation between legitimate ruses and forbidden acts of perfidy is sometimes
indistinct, but the following examples indicate the correct principles. It would be an improper
practice to secure an advantage of the enemy by deliberate lying or misleading conduct which
involves a breach of faith, or when there is a moral obligation to speak the truth.

For example, it is improper to feign surrender so as to secure an advantage over the opposing
belligerent thereby. So similarly, to broadcast to the enemy that an armistice had been agreed
upon when such is not the case would be treacherous. On the other hand, it is a perfectly
proper ruse to summon a force to surrender on the ground that it is surrounded and thereby
induce such surrender with a small force.  Treacherous or perfidious conduct in war is
forbidden because it destroys the basis for a restoration of peace short of the complete
annihilation of one belligerent by the other.”

and…
“the injury complained of is attended by circumstances of fraud, malice, or willful and
wanton conduct;

When one considers the Acts committed, there can be no confusion with regards as to
rather the said acts were then and are now:

“willful and wanton conduct" means conduct purposefully committed which the actor must
have realized as dangerous, done heedlessly and recklessly, without regard to consequences,
or of the rights and safety of others, particularly the plaintiff.”;

82
Now let us define “RIGHT”, so as to make it clear what a right is and who possesses
Rights, to wit:
“Right. A well-founded claim. If people believe that humanity itself establishes or proves
certain claims, either upon fellow beings, or upon society or government, they call these
claims human rights; if they believe that these claims inhere in the very nature of man
himself, they called them inherent, inalienable rights;

and…
“Under basic rules of construction, statutory laws enacted by legislative bodies cannot
impair rights given under a constitution. 194 B.R. at 925.”
(See: In re Young, 235 B.R. 666 (Bankr.M.D.Fla., 1999))

Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr., whom, not only understood these laws and their
principles, but also understood the true nature of the Federal Reserve Act, to wit:

“This Act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth. … THE PEOPLE MUST MAKE A
DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE TO RELIEVE THEMSELVES FROM THE
MONETARY POWER.”

A wise man summed it up some years ago. He said:

“I feel more anxiety today than even in the midst of war. As a result of the war, the
corporations have now been enthroned, and an era of corruption will follow in the high
places. The moneyed powers will endeavor to prolong their reign on the prejudice of man,
until all wealth is aggregated in the hands of a few, and the Republic is destroyed….”
(Abraham Lincoln) (See: 'The Trilateral Commission and Elite planning for World
Management' pg. 514)

It is criminal to intimidate the population of a nation or state, for the destructive impact of
terrorism on human rights and security, which has been recognized, as previously
mentioned above, at the highest levels of the United Nations as unlawful, notably, by the
Security Council, the General Assembly, the former Commission on Human Rights and
the new Human Rights Council 7. Specifically, Member States have set out that
terrorism:

“Threatens the dignity and security of human beings everywhere, endangers or takes
innocent lives, creates an environment that destroys the freedom from fear of the people,
jeopardizes fundamental freedoms, and aims at the destruction of human rights;”

and…

“Has links with transnational organized crime, drug trafficking, money-laundering and
trafficking in arms, as well as illegal transfers of nuclear, chemical and biological materials,
and is linked to the consequent commission of serious crimes such as murder, extortion,
kidnapping, assault, hostage-taking and robbery;”

83
But first let’s look to the free internationally recognized encyclopedia which is known as
Wikipedia for other definitions pertaining to crimes committed against a nation’s own
people in criminal and unlawful acts of terrorism, to wit:

“State-sponsored terrorism is a term used to describe terrorism sponsored by nation-states.

As with terrorism, the precise definition, and the identification of particular examples, are
subjects of heated political dispute. In general state-sponsored terrorism is associated with
paramilitary. It is also frequently used in conjunction with state terrorism, which is (an
accusation of) terrorism committed by governments.”
(See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State-sponsored_terrorism )

and…

“A death squad is an armed military, police, insurgent, or terrorist squad that conducts
extrajudicial killings, assassinations, and forced disappearances of persons as part of a war,
insurgency or terror campaign. These killings are often conducted in ways meant to ensure
the secrecy of the killers' identities, so as to avoid accountability.
Death squads are often, but not exclusively, associated with the violent political repression
under dictatorships, totalitarian states and similar regimes. They typically have the tacit or
express support of the state, as a whole or in part (see state terrorism). Death squads may
comprise a secret police force, paramilitary group or official government units with
members drawn from the military or the police. They may also be organized as vigilante
groups.” (See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_Squads )

and…

“An extrajudicial killing is the killing of a person by governmental authorities without the
sanction of any judicial proceeding or legal process. Extrajudicial punishments are by their
nature unlawful, since they bypass the due process of the legal jurisdiction in which they
occur. Extrajudicial killings often target leading political, trade union, dissident, religious,
and social figures and may be carried out by the state government or other state authorities
like the armed forces and police.”
(See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extrajudicial_killing)

WOW, I guess we now have a clearer understanding of the true nature of the responsible
parties, which apparently, are not middle-eastern people, but rather, ENGLAND; ET
AL.!!! I believe the following quotation will further clarify this matter much further for
us all, to wit:

“It is patently impossible to discuss social engineering or the automation of a society, i.e., the
engineering of social automation systems (silent weapons) on a national scale without
implying extensive objectives of social control and destruction of human life, i.e., slavery and
genocide.

This manual is in itself an analog declaration of intent. Such a writing must be secured from
public scrutiny. Otherwise, it might be recognized as a technically formal declaration of
domestic war. Furthermore, whenever any person or group of persons in a position of great
power, and without the full knowledge and consent of the public, uses such knowledge and
methodology for economic conquest – it must be understood that a state of domestic warfare
exist between said person or group of persons and the public.” (See: Top Secret Silent
Weapons for Quiet Wars Operations Research Technical Manual 7905.1 at Pg. 6, under the
title ‘Security’)

84
A Long Range Plan of War, applicable to bankrupt cities,; ET AL., later granted
Emergency Corporate City Charters). I also found the following on Wikipedia, to wit:

“A  state of emergency is a situation in which a government is empowered to perform actions

that it would normally not be permitted. A government can declare such state during a
disaster, civil unrest, or armed conflict. Such declaration alerts citizens to change their
normal behavior and orders government agencies to implement emergency
plans. Justitium is its equivalent in Roman law—a concept in which the senate could put
forward a final decree (senatus consultum ultimum) that was not subject to dispute.”

and…

“States of emergency can also be used as a rationale or pretext for suspending rights and
freedoms guaranteed under a country's constitution or basic law. The procedure for and
legality of doing so vary by country.” (See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_emergency )

There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been
Administrators (See: FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v PE 261 US 428 1 Stat. 138-178);
and the Seat of Government was removed from Philadelphia to the District in 1800. As it
exist today, it constitutes but one county, called the county of Washington. 

There have not been any Article III Judicial Courts and there are no Article III Judicial
judges, with the only exception being the Judges of the Supreme Court. (See: Judicial
Code of 1911… the U.S. Congress passed the Judicial Code of 1911 and thereby made all
District and Circuit courts into entirely administrative Art. IV Territorial Courts, which
had jurisdiction only, over the federal zone. All the federal courts except the U.S.
Supreme Court changed character from being Article III Judicial Courts to
Administrative Article IV Territorial Courts only. All the district courts were renamed
from:
“District Court of the United States” to “United States District Court”. 

Furthermore: The Supreme Court said in Balzac v. Puerto Rico, 258 U.S. 198 (1921) that:

“the “United States District Court” is an Article IV territorial court, not an Article III
constitutional court.”

Consequently, all the federal courts excepting the Supreme Court became administrative
Art. IV courts that were part of the Executive rather than the Judicial Branch of the
government and all the judges became Executive Branch employees, and could no longer
claim Art. III status, nor authority. See article “Authorities on Jurisdiction of Federal
Courts” for further details. (Also See: Judicial Code of 1911…)

Now that the definitions of Emergency, Marshal Law, War Powers, etc., have been
addressed, the only definition necessary now, to evidence without question, that our
nation has been in a state of War and furthermore, evidences that our Lands are now and
have been under a foreign military occupation can be found. The evidence of this fact

85
that America is Occupied, by an Occupying Belligerent and War Criminal, is found in the
definition of PRIZE COURT, and other related legal definitions, to wit:

PRIZE COURT. That branch of admiralty which adjudicates upon cases of maritime
captures made in time of war. (See: ADMIRALTY and Dougl. 613. Also See: JUDICATURE
ACTS AND BOUVIER’S LAW DICT. 1857 Pg. 2724)

and…
“In the United States, the admiralty courts discharge the duties both of the prize and an
instance court (q.v.) The District Courts are prize courts; (See: Glass v. The Betsey, 3 Dall.
(U.S.) 6, 1 L. Ed. 485. And are given much jurisdiction by the Judicial Code, March 3, 1911,
with a direct appeal to the Supreme Court.”

and…

“A prize court of the captor cannot sit in neutral territory, though it may in conquered
territory, and in that of a co-belligerent”; (See: 2 Halleck, int. L., Baker’s ed. 401)

and…

“Enemy. Adversary; e.g. military adversary.

Enemy alien. An alien residing or traveling in a coun try which is at war with the country of
which he is a national. Enemy aliens may be interned or restricted.

Enemy belligerent. Citizens who associate themselves with the military arm of an enemy
government and enter the United States bent on hostile acts. [Ex parte Quirin, App.D.C., 317 U.S.
1, 63 S.Ct. 2, 15, 87 L.Ed. 3].

Enemy's property. In international law, and particularly in the usage of prize courts, this term
designates any property which is engaged or used in illegal intercourse with the public enemy,
whether belonging to an ally or a citizen, as the illegal traffic stamps it with the hostile character
and attaches to it all the penal consequences.

Public enemy. A nation at war with the United States; also every citizen or subject of such nation.
Term however does not generally include robbers, thieves, private depredators, or riotous mobs.
The term has acquired, in the vocabulary of journalism and civic indignation, a more extended
meaning, denoting a particularly notorious offender against the criminal laws, especially one who
seems more or less immune from successful prosecution, or a social, health or economic condition
or problem affecting the public at large, which is difficult to abate or control. [Black’s Law Dict.
6th Ed. Pg. 528]

and…

“Plunder, v. To pillage or loot. To take property from persons or places by open force, and this
may be in course of a war, or by unlawful hostility, as in the case of pirates or robbers. The term is
also used to express the idea of taking property from a person or place, without just right, but not
expressing the nature or quality of the wrong done.

Plunder, n. Personal property belonging to an enemy, captured and appropriated on land; booty.
Also the act of seizing such property. See Booty; Prize.

86
 Plunderage. In maritime law, the embezzlement of goods on board of a ship is so called. [Black’s
Law Dict. 6th Ed. Pg. 1154]

and…

“A vessel or cargo, belonging to one of two belligerent powers, apprehended or forcibly

captured at sea by a war-vessel or privateer of the other belligerent, and claimed as enemy's
property, and therefore liable to appropriation and condemnation under the laws of war.
The apprehension and detention at sea of a ship or other vessel, by authority of a belligerent
power, either with the design of appropriating it, with the goods and effects it contains, or
with that of becoming master of the whole or a part of its cargo.

Prize courts. Courts having jurisdiction to adjudicate upon captures made at sea in time of
war, and to condemn the captured property as prize if lawfully subject to that sentence. In
England, the admiralty courts have jurisdiction as prize courts, distinct from the jurisdiction
on the instance side. A special commission issues in time of war to the judge of the admiralty
court, to enable him to hold such court. In the United States, the federal district courts have
jurisdiction in cases of prize. 28 V.S.C.A. § 1333.

Prize goods. Goods which are taken on the high seas, jure belli, out of the hands of the
enemy.

Prize law. The system of laws and rules applicable to the capture of prize at sea; its
condemnation, rights of the captors, distribution of the proceeds, etc.

Prize money. A dividend from the proceeds of a captured vessel, etc., paid to the captors. V.
S. v. Steever, 113 V.S. 747, 5 S.Ct. 765, 28 L.Ed. 1133. [Black’s Law Dict. 6th Ed. Pg. 1200]

and…

“Belligerency Ib;)lij;)r;)nsiy/. In international law, the status of de facto statehood attributed

to a body of insurgents, by which their hostilities are legalized. The international status
assumed by a state (i.e. nation) which wages war against another state. Quality of being
belligerent; status of a belligerent; act or state of waging war; warfare.

Belligerent Ib;)lij;)r;)ntl. In international law, as an adjective, it means engaged in lawful

war. As a noun, it designates either of two nations which are actually in a state of war with
each other, as well as their allies actively co-operating, as distinguished from a nation which
takes no part in the war and maintains a strict indifference as between the contending
parties, called a "neutral." As a personality trait, refers to one who is overly assertive,
hostile or combative.

Belligerents. A body of insurgents who by reason of their temporary organized government

are regarded as conducting lawful hostilities. Also, militia, corps of volunteers, and others,
who although not part of the regular army of the state, are regarded as lawful com batants
provided they observe the laws of war. See also Belligerency; Belligerent.

Bellum Ibel;)m/. Lat. In public law, war. An armed contest between nations; the state of
those who forcibly contend with each other. Jus belli, the law of war. [Black’s Law Dict. 6th
Ed. Pg. 155.]

and…

87
 “Booty. Property captured from the enemy in war, on land.
[Black’s Law Dict. 6th Ed. Pg. 187]

and…

“A piratis aut latronibus capti liberi permanent /ey preyts ot ltrownbs kreptay libray
p:}rmnnt/. Persons taken by pirates or robbers remain free.

A piratis et latronibus capta dominum non mutant /ey preyts et ltrownbs krept dminiym non
myu.wtrentl. Capture by pirates and robbers does not change title. No right to booty vests in
piratical captors; no right can be derived from them by recaptors to the prejudice of the original
owners. [Black’s Law Dict. 6th Ed. Pg. 95]
and…

“Angary, right of. In international law, formerly the right (jus angarire) claimed by a
belligerent to seize merchant vessels in the harbors of the belligerent and to compel them, on
payment of freight, to transport troops and supplies to a designated port.

The right of a belligerent to appropriate, either for use, or for destruction in case of
necessity, neutral property temporarily located in his own territory or in that of the other
belligerent. The property may be of any description whatever, provided the appropriation of
it be for military or naval purposes.” [Black’s Law Dict. 6th Ed. Pg. 87]

and…

“Aniens, or anient. Null, void, of no force or effect. See Anniented. [Black’s Law Dict. 6th Ed.
Pg. 87.]

and…

“Anti manifesto. A term used in international law to denote a proclamation or manifesto

published by one of two belligerent powers, alleging reasons why the war is defensive on its
part. [Black’s Law Dict. 6th Ed. Pg. 93.]

and…

“Belief. A conviction of the truth of a proposition, existing subjectively in the mind, and
induced by argument, persuasion, or proof addressed to the judgment. Latrobe v. J. H.
Cross Co., D.C.Pa., 29 F.2d 210, 212. A conclusion arrived at from external sources after
weighing probability. Conviction of the mind, arising not from actual perception or
knowledge, but by way of inference, or from evidence received or information derived from
others.

Knowledge is an assurance of a fact or proposition founded on perception by the senses, or

intuition; while "belief' is an assurance gained by evidence, and from other persons.
"Suspicion" is weaker than "belief," since suspicion requires no real foundation for its
existence, while "belief' is necessarily based on at least assumed facts. Cook v. Singer Sewing
Mach. Co., 138 Cal.App. 418, 32 P.2d 430, 431.

Belief-action distinction. The distinction noted in analysis of cases under First Amendment,
U.S. Constitution-freedom of speech and religion-to the effect that one is guaranteed the
right to any belief he chooses, but when that belief is translated into action, the state also has
rights under its police power to protect others from such actions. Reynolds v. U. S . , 98 U. S.

88
 145, 164. Also see: [Black’s Law Dict. 6th Ed. Pg. 155.]

It is necessary for American’s to clearly understand, by what Lawfully delegated Civil

Authority, or whose appointment/assignment of Authority; (Rather the same be a Military
Occupying Belligerent of a foreign alien enemy (THE BANK & THE FUND), or
otherwise); and Claimant further states that everything today is a result of a “National
PSYOPS Plan. That is to say, as a result of a Psychological Warfare (PSYOP) Plan, and
ALL AREA PSYOP COMMANDERS MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE
NATIONAL PSYOPS PLAN that American’s are being sifted like wheat THROUGH
today. [FM33-1; et al.] (See: https://www.psywar.org/psywar/reproductions/FM_33_1_1968.pdf )
This and other related documents show a far more sinister inter-dependent operation
which evidences what has happened over and over and over in Claimant’s cases, on the
record, regarding the plunder, extortion, sabotage, economic warfare, electronic warfare
and the theft, losses, damages, injuries, both loss and destruction of private property,
systems, systems of records, resources, have been poisoned, evidence destroyed,
witnesses attacked and heinous lies and seditions, un-registered foreign alien
associations, organizations and Corporations run wild like viruses in our systems which
are both; real and tangible.

Under all kinds of Declaration(s) of Emergency, States of Emergency, National

Emergency, Economic Emergency, International Economic Emergency, Marshal Law, or
otherwise; as stated in the above descriptions,: “for suspending rights and freedoms
guaranteed under a country's constitution or basic law. “; and “could put forward a
final decree (senatus consultum ultimum) that was not subject to dispute.”

Our Countrymen must know… BY WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY and HOW
are such said Judges & Magistrates swearing Oaths and Affirmations (or operating courts
absent an oath to uphold the Constitution(s)) which have been Dissolved and/or
Suspended, set aside, or otherwise, pursuant to declared States of Emergency, or National
Emergency, which is evident in the National Emergencies Act:

The National Emergencies Act (Pub.L. 94–412, 90 Stat. 1255, enacted September 14, 1976,

codified at 50 U.S.C. § 1601-1651) is a United States federal law passed to stop open-ended states
of national emergency and formalize the power of Congress to provide certain checks and
balances on the emergency powers of the President. 

Codified they say, at 50 USC? Pardon me, but I don’t think so! Now isn’t that the
portion of the United States Code which applies to the Government and matters of WAR?
It appears by the governments own websites that 27 of the 53 United States Codes have
never been enacted (Codified) into positive (statutory) law, including, but not limited to
50 U.S.C., which as seen above, they falsely claim to be CODIFIED???

The Emergency is well documented in Senate Report 93-549; and admits in full to
what is being said here. (See: https://archive.org/stream/senate-report-93-549/senate-report-93-549_djvu.txt)
Only failing to touch upon the subjects of Corporate Charter(s) and the said City
Charter(s) Declaring an Emergency, obviously of a perpetual magnitude, as a city’s
Corporate Charter is what the City is governed by, not the Constitution. Now if all

89
laws, rules, regulations and the like, which are in conflict with the Constitutions, are null
and void from the date of their creations, then who has been perpetuating this massive
fraud and theft upon the people.

This intolerable fraud has been perpetuated by those whom we thought were our
brother(s) and sister(s), our countrymen. If this single fact is true, then there are traitors
in our midst, whom are aiding, abetting, counseling and commanding the protection and
furtherance of such unconstitutional schemes to the grave detriment, damage, injury and
losses to The People of The State of Colorado; and elsewhere.

The injuries and the like harms, along with the dangers, which accompany the same said
Corporate Charter Entities are a threat to the people of a society, by their mere municipal
daily practices and activities. Activities, all of which Claimant argues are committed to
the most grave Reckless, Careless and Wonton Disregard for the General Public, At
Large; and in Reckless and Wonton disregard for The People of The State of Colorado;
and as such, have become a reckless endangerment; and are endangering the Public; and
have even become a direct threat to the mental health and stability of our Society,
whereby the same have become a reckless endangerment to the mental stability of The
People of The State of Colorado; and as such, have become a Terror and a Threat to the
Public Health and Safety?

They are incapable of meeting their internal and external obligations on a daily basis.
On March 17, 1993, in Congressional Record-House, at Pg. 5321, Mr. Traficant stated:

“Mr. Speaker, we are here now in chapter 11. Members of Congress are official trustees
presiding over the greatest reorganization of any bankrupt entity in world history, the U.S.
Government. We are setting forth hopefully a blue print for our future. There are some
who say it is a coroner’s report that will lead to our demise...

...But let me give one word of caution here today. America already has race wars, let us be
honest about it. We already have gender wars, let us be honest about it. We already have
age wars, let us be honest about it. One thing this Congress had better not get involved in
and get trapped into is a class war on money. In America if you can not earn all that you
can, there is something wrong and there is no more a spirit of free enterprise.

I want to say this to the members. We may talk about taxing the rich, but the rich people
have already taken their companies and their jobs out of America. Be careful that the rich
people do not take their money out of America, because the Government already raises our
kids, feeds our kids, houses our kids, and the government is doing a very poor job of it. I
think mom and dad would be better utilized there once again...” [Underlined emphases are
mine]

Now, while on the subject of 50 U.S.C. and Emergency War Powers, which if applicable
to the civilian population, would render civilian courts sitting as Military Court’s under
Marshal Law, to wit:

“mar·tial law
ˈˌmärSHəl ˈlô
noun
military government involving the suspension of ordinary law.”

90
and…

“Martial law
Martial law is the imposition of direct military control of normal civilian functions of government ,
especially in response to a temporary emergency such as invasion or major disaster, or in an
occupied territory. Martial law can be used by governments to enforce their rule over the
public. Wikipedia

and…

“Martial law Imarsh;}1 16l. Exists when military authorities carry on government or exercise
various degrees of control over civilians or civilian authorities in domestic territory. [Ochikubo v.
Bonesteel, D.C.Cal., 60 F.Supp. 9 16, 928, 929, 930]. Such may exist either in time of war or
when civil authority has ceased to function or has become ineffective. A system of law, obtaining
only in time of actual war and growing out of the exigencies thereof, arbitrary in its character,
and depending only on the will of the commander of an army, which is established and
administered in a place or district of hostile territory held in belligerent possession, or, some times,
in places occupied or pervaded by insurgents or mobs, and which suspends all existing civil laws,
as well as the civil authority and the ordinary administration of justice. See also Military
government; Military law. (pg. 974)

and…

“Definition of martial law.

1: the law applied in occupied territory by the military authority of the occupying power. 2:
the law administered by military forces that is invoked by a government in an emergency when the
civilian law enforcement agencies are unable to maintain public order and safety. (See: “Martial
Law | Definition of Martial Law by Merriam-Webster-
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/martial%20law )

Further understanding with regards to this time frame regarding Martial Law, etc.,; and
when it all really began starting and why it was in the latter 1800’s. Nobody in America
had ever really heard of Martial Law.

The reason why is because When the Southern states walked out of Congress on March
27, 1861, the quorum to conduct business under the Constitution was lost. The only votes
that Congress could lawfully take, under Parliamentary Law, were those to set the time to
reconvene, take a vote to get a quorum, and vote to adjourn and set a date, time, and place
to reconvene at a later time, but instead, Congress abandoned the House and Senate
without setting a date to reconvene. Under the parliamentary law of Congress, when this
happened, Congress became sine die (pronounced see-na dee-a; literally "without day")
and thus when Congress adjourned sine die, it ceased to exist as a lawful deliberative
body, and the only lawful, constitutional power that could declare war was no longer
lawful, or in session.

The Southern states, by virtue of their secession from the Union, also ceased to exist sine
die, and some state legislatures in the Northern bloc also adjourned sine die, and thus, all
the states, which were parties to creating the Constitution ceased to exist. President
Lincoln executed the first executive order written by any President on April 15, 1861,
Executive Order 1, and the nation has been ruled by the President under executive order

91
ever since.

When Congress eventually did reconvene, it was reconvened under the military authority
of the Commander-in-Chief and not by Rules of Order for Parliamentary bodies or by
Constitutional Law; placing the American people under martial rule ever since that
national emergency declared by President Lincoln. The Constitution for the United
States of America temporarily ceased to be the law of the land, and the President,
Congress, and the Courts unlawfully presumed that they were free to remake the nation in
their own image, whereas, lawfully, no constitutional provisions were in place which
afforded power to any of the actions which were taken which presumed to place the
nation under the new form of control.

President Lincoln knew that he had no authority to issue any executive order, and yet he
commissioned Executive Order 1, (April 24, 1863) as a special field code to govern his
actions under martial law and which justified the seizure of power, which extended the
laws of the District of Columbia, and which fictionally implemented the provisions of
Article I, Section 8, Clauses 17-18 of the Constitution beyond the boundaries of
Washington, D.C. and into the several states. General Orders No. 100, also called the
Lieber Instructions and the Lieber Code, extended The Laws of War and International
Law onto American soil, and the United States government became the presumed
conqueror of the people and the land.

Martial rule was kept secret and has never ended, the nation has been ruled under
Military Law by the Commander-in-Chief of that military; the President, under his
assumed executive powers and according to his executive orders. Constitutional law
under the original Constitution is enforced only as a matter of keeping the public peace
under the provisions of General Orders No. 100 under martial rule. Under Martial Law,
title is a mere fiction, since all property belongs to the military except for that property
which the Commander-in-Chief may, in his benevolence, exempt from taxation and
seizure and upon which he allows the enemy to reside.

Therefore, President Lincoln knew very well that the Nation was facing grave matters, as
Lincoln stated, “a crises” and Lincoln knew all too well who was behind this crises
when he stated:

“The money powers prey upon the nation in times of peace and conspire against it in times
of adversity. The banking powers are more despotic than a monarchy, more insolent than
autocracy, more selfish than bureaucracy. They denounce as public enemies all who question
their methods or throw light upon their crimes. I have two great enemies, the Southern Army
in front of me and the bankers in the rear. Of the two, the one at my rear is my greatest foe.
Corporations have been enthroned, and an era of corruption in high places will follow. The
money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices
of the people until the wealth is aggregated in the hands of a few, and the Republic is destroyed.
(See: Abraham Lincoln  (more by this author) 1809-1865 (Age at death: 56 approx.)

President Lincoln was assassinated before he could complete plans for reestablishing
constitutional government in the Southern States and end the martial rule by executive
order, and the 14th Article in Amendment to the Constitution created a new citizenship

92
status for the new expanded jurisdiction. New laws for the District of Columbia were
established and passed by Congress in 1871, supplanting those established Feb. 27, 1801
and May 3, 1802. The District of Columbia was re-incorporated in 1872, and all states in
the Union were reformed as Franchisees of the Federal Corporation so that a new Union
of the United States could be created.

The key to when the states became Federal Franchisees is related to the date when such
states enacted the Field Code in law. The Field Code was a codification of the common
law that was adopted first by New York and then by California in 1872, and shortly
afterwards the Lieber Code was used to bring the United States into the 1874 Brussels
Conference and into the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907.

In 1917, the Trading with the Enemy Act (Public Law 65-91, 65th Congress, Session I,
Chapters 105, 106, October 6, 1917) was passed and which defined, regulated and
punished trading with enemies, who were then required by that act to be licensed by the
government to do business. The National Banking System Act (Public Law 73-1, 73rd
Congress, Session I, Chapter 1, March 9, 1933), Executive Proclamation 2038 (March 6,
1933), Executive Proclamation 2039 (March 9, 1933), and Executive Orders 6073, 6102,
6111 and 6260 prove that in 1933, the United States Government formed under the
executive privilege of the original martial rule went bankrupt, and a new state of national
emergency was declared under which United States citizens were named as the enemy to
the government and the banking system as per the provisions of the Trading with the
Enemy Act.

Further admissions of such wars are found in the Official Public Record as a result of Ex-
Congressman James Traficant’s Statement in the Congressional Record, March 17, 1993,
Vol. 33, Page H-1303, which states:

“...But let me give one word of caution here today.

America already has race wars, let us be honest about it.
We already have gender wars, let us be honest about it.
We already have age wars, let us be honest about it...”
(See: https://www.pdfnano.com/ex/96w4wnw0ve_ex_congressman_james_traficant_39_s_statement_in_the_congressional_record_march_17_1993_vol_33_page_h_1303 )

The legal system provided for in the Constitution was formally changed in 1938 through
the Supreme Court decision in the case of Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 US 64, 82
L.Ed. 1188. On April 25, 1938, the Supreme Court overturned the standing precedents
of the prior 150 years concerning "COMMON LAW" in the federal government, when
stating:

“THERE IS NO FEDERAL COMMON LAW, AND CONGRESS HAS NO POWER TO

DECLARE SUBSTANTIVE RULES OF COMMON LAW applicable IN A STATE,
WHETHER they be LOCAL or GENERAL in their nature, be they COMMERCIAL LAW
or a part of LAW OF TORTS.” (See: ERIE RAILROAD CO. vs. THOMPKINS, 304 U.S.
64, 82 L. Ed. 1188)

The Common Law is the fountain source of Substantive and Remedial Rights, if not our

93
very Liberties. (See also: Who is Running America?)

In 1945 the United States gave up any remaining national sovereignty when it signed the
United Nations Treaty, making all American citizens subject to United Nations
jurisdiction. The “constitution” of the United Nations may be compared to that of the
old Soviet Union.

BUT MAKE NO MISTAKES ABOUT IT, THE CONSTITUTION OF THE

UNITED NATIONS IS THE OLD SOVIET UNION. Those Past U.S. Presidents
Such as George Herbert Walker Bush's Statements long ago about how: "They have long
awaited a New World Order and how... now they can see all their (U.N. P5 Members)
work coming into Effect... along with their Real Prospect of a New World Order, etc....

So, Now let us reflect on who has long been in command of the U.N. New World Order
Forces, say, from 1946, after WWII, to the days of which George Herbert Walker Bush
made those statements in 1990 & 1991. The words of George Herbert Walker Bush as
he said on January 17, 1991:
 
“We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new
world order, a world where the rule of law, not the law of the jungle, governs the conduct of
nations. When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world
order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the
promise and vision of the United Nation’s founder.”

-or- When he (George Herbert Walker Bush) said on September 11, 1990:

“The crisis in the Persian Gulf offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of
cooperation. Out of these trouble times…. a new world order can emerge in which the nations
of the world, east and west, north and south, can prosper and live in harmony…. Today the new
world is struggling to be born.”?

The major author of the United Nations Charter was a communist named Alger Hiss.
According to the Stage III Plans of the Department of State Publication 7277 on
Disarmament. It further states that the UN peace Keeping Forces shall be commanded, at
all times, by a Russian.

In considering the United States under jurisdiction of this “higher authority”, one must
understand that the following people have served the UN as Military Staff Leader to the
UN Dept. of Political and Security Council Affairs:

1946-1949: Arkady Sobolev (USSR)

1949-1953: Konstaintin Zinchenko (USSR)
1953-1954: Dragoslav Protitch (Yugoslavia)
1954-1957: Ilya Tchernychev (USSR)
1958-1960: Anatoly Dobrynin (USSR)
1960-1962: Georgy Arkadev (USSR)
1963-1965: V.P. Suslov (USSR)

94
1965-1968: Alexei E. Nesterenko (USSR)
1968-1973: Leonid N. Kutakov (USSR)
1973-1978: Arkady N. Shevchenko (USSR)
1978-1981: Mikhail D. Sytenko (USSR)
1981-1986: Viacheslav A. Ustinov (USSR)
1987-1990: Vasilly S. Safronchuk (USSR)

So, No the US/USSR collusion did not begin with Mr. TRUMP, but rather with those
lifers in the House of Representatives, in collusion with The Bush family.! The Collusion
actually began with the COMMUNIST, USSR, China, et al, prior to becoming a P5
Member of the Communist United Nations Organization, whom the U.S. Congress
surrendered our Nation, our several States and the People thereof to, upon approving the
United Nations..
From the standpoint of the president, the RUSSIAN collusion started with the prior
President’s. Not to mention the George Herbert Walker Bush's private business dealings
with CUBA all those years...

ALL OF WHICH IS SHOWN IN THE (1990-91) EDITION OF THE CIA WORLD

FACTBOOK STATING THAT USSR/RUSSIA WAS THE "BENNIFACTOR" OF
CUBA?!?!?! HMMM??? SO WHO AGAIN WAS BUSH REALLY DEALING WITH,
UNDER GUISE OF COMMUNIST CUBA??? COMMUNIST RUSSIA… THAT'S
WHO!

Therefore, can somebody in the U.S.A., please tell me, who has really been doing
business, along with disclosure of classified information with and to Russia, via
Communist Cuba, whose entire business dealings were for their "BENEFACTOR"
(COMMUNIST USSR/RUSSIA)... Just look up Humble Oil, the Barbara 1, Barbara 2
and Barbara 3 planes of George Herbert Walker Bush during his business ventures off the
coast of Cuba.

Furthermore, I wonder if they were properly registered as a card carrying communist, or

communist sympathizers/ businessmen / agents / representatives, et al; along with their
foreign agents registration & statements to do business with these foreign powers and
foreign agents / principles and their "BENEFACTORS" OF THE COMMUNIST
PARTY, for and with whom they were in the business of dealing, buying, selling, money
laundering of Transnational illicit drugs and illegal Arms Trade???!!! I ask again, were
they Registered as such, pursuant to the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938
(FARA).

When one truly considers all the many reasons for the sudden Municipal push throughout
the Several States, the list of considerations grows very long. However, one reason
which seems to continually make the short list around the same time period, is found in
the Secret Treaty of Verona, but one piece, which I believe to be a nexus connection via
the same High Contracting Parties, which are participating therein. This connection is
found in Art. 7, to wit:

95
 “ART. 7. The present treaty shall be ratified and the ratifications exchanged at Paris within
the space of six months. 
Made at Verona the 22d November, 1822.

So, this secret treaty (of the HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES) had to be ratified and
exchanged in Paris France. Again tying to France and when the France Armed Forces
trained the MUNICODE Registered Agent of these Charter Counties, Cities, Townships,
States, et al.; and the Municipal Code Corporation (as Supreme Codifier of Home Rule
Chartered Counties, Cities, Towns, et al), as previously stated above, is furthering the
seditious conspiracy of Incorporated City Charters, granted by the several States United.

TODAY’S CONTINUED EVIDENCE

OF THE HOLY WAR ON AMERICA

Further evidence of the parties true intent and their long established and deep-rooted ties
back to British Intelligence in London, England. Accomplished by and through the
military organization known as the “BRITISH-ISRAEL MOVEMENT”.

This organization’s true plans and intents are the same today, as they have been for over
200 years now! That is to say, to overthrow the constitutional government in America,
bringing both America; and the People thereof, back under British Sovereignty.

This and sooooo-much-more is outright confessed and admitted to, along with their
admissions to their planned ways and means to bring America back under British
Sovereignty and how the Royal Family can safely take up residence in America. Now,
the evidence of the Royal Families desire to take up residence here, has been confirmed
by Prince Harry’s relocation of his family residence is now in California. (See:
https://www.scribd.com/document/365794464/British-Israel-Movement-A-Congressional-Investigation )

Now one may think that there is no way this could be true. However, contrary to popular
belief, it is so true that it’s scary. However, is there any further evidence of this plan to
overthrow the Sovereignty of the United States of America by any other entity, one must
first understand that the British – Israel Movement is but further evidence with regards to
a British “HOLY WAR” being waged upon the United States of America and the people
thereof. This HOLY WAR currently being waged upon the American people, was also
told to our people during the time of our Nations birth and infancy, (i.e.) 1781.

Allow me to take us back over 230 years, when our founding father George Washington
(Son of the Republic) was told of this coming battle or “HOLY WAR”! Recalling the
comments of Cornwallis upon his surrendering to George Washington was in reference to
the “battle”, not the “war”. See the Article of Capitulation signed by Cornwallis at

96
Yorktown. Jonathon Williams recorded in his book, ‘Legions of Satan,’ (1781), that
Cornwallis revealed to Washington during his surrender that:

“a holy war will now begin on America, and when it is ended America will be
supposedly the citadel of freedom, but her millions will unknowingly be loyal
subjects to the Crown.”… “in less than two hundred years the whole nation
will be working for divine world government. That government that they
believe to be divine will be the British Empire .”

One may ask: But how are they doing this and who are those utilized to attack and wage
WAR on the American People. And where are the documents evidencing that the people
are actually targeted as the enemy, or that a state of WAR even exist today, much less,
against the People? Maybe even asking: and where is the evidence of this Occupying
Belligerent and what government does this belligerent represent?

Claimant will provide all those answers herein. Let us first touch upon the evidence of
the War extending to the people themselves here in America, which is still operative
today.
(See: https://youtu.be/kWgxHwsh4Mo ) This can be found under the “Trading With
The Enemy Act” of October 16, 1917 and March 9, 1933.

Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917 & 1933

(NOTICE: You Have Been Declared the Enemy!)
 
The first Act was dated October 6, 1917, under the Trading with the Enemy Act, Section
2, subdivision (c), Chapter 106 - Enemy defined:

“other than citizens of the United States...”

However, on March 9, 1933, Chapter 106, Section 5, subdivision (b) of the Trading with
the Enemy Act of Oct.6 1917 (40 Stat. L. 411) was amended as follows:

“...any person within the United States..” (Also See: H.R. 1491 Public No.1)

Sir, we are at war, as evidenced herein or as shown in the Exhibits attached hereto, rather
we would have it or not, our enemies have breached our borders, breached our walls and
are now at our inner-gates. They have already seized control of the American Nation and
the several states thereof.

They have been and in fact, they are now, mobilizing our own defenses against us, at
least those of us who may attempt to oppose them. They are so advanced and well
trained in the art of war, that they have deceived US (We, The People), into financing
the “Quiet War” being waged against us, in lieu of them financing their own military
campaign. Knowing that any “Bankrupt” entity is no longer that as it was before, they
have created our current “Financial Crisis” through particular and well defined design!

This includes attacks on the Nation, State(s) and US, (We, The People). But the attacks
do not come in the light of day as a respectable and honorable man would, but rather like

97
cowards, they come in the night while we sleep, using not the conclusions made of their
own minds, but rather, from the evil wicked spirit forces of the machine nations, i.e.
“Top Secret - Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars Operations Research
Technical Manual 7905.1 ”. For those behind these programs, one must look to
the Congressional Records, to wit:

“(See: Attached Exhibit “2”) consisting of 28 pages from the 1940 Congressional Record. THE
76th CONGRESS, THIRD SESSION – Steps Toward British Union, a World State, and
International Strife- Part I – IX (1940)”

This in and of itself, are Banned Criminal Acts of “Ethnic Cleansing,” and “Racial
Discrimination”, which Complainant’s research has revealed to still be the language
of their Corporate City Charters!”

There have long been well recognized prohibitions against “Ethnic Cleansing,” on the
National and International Levels, to wit:

“Ethnic cleansing as a crime under international law

There is no formal legal definition of ethnic cleansing. However,
ethnic cleansing in the broad sense - the forcible deportation of a population
- is defined as a crime against humanity under the statutes of both
International Criminal Court (ICC) and the International Criminal Tribunal
for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY). The gross human-rights violations
integral to stricter definitions of ethnic cleansing are treated as separate
crimes falling under the definitions for genocide or crimes against humanity
of the statutes.

The UN Commission of Experts (established pursuant to Security

Council Resolution 780 ) held that the practices associated with ethnic
cleansing "constitute crimes against humanity and can be assimilated to
specific war crimes. Furthermore ... such acts could also fall within the
meaning of the Genocide Convention." The UN General Assembly condemned
"ethnic cleansing" and racial hatred in a 1992 resolution.

There are however situations, such as the expulsion of Germans after

World War II, where ethnic cleansing has taken place without legal redress
(See: Preussische Treuhand v. Poland ). Timothy V. Waters argues that if
similar circumstances arise in the future, this precedent would allow the
ethnic cleansing of other populations under international law.”

The purpose of ethnic cleansing is to remove competitors. The party

implementing this policy sees a risk (or a useful scapegoat) in a particular
ethnic group, and uses propaganda about that group to stir up FUD (fear,
uncertainty and doubt) in the general population. The targeted ethnic group
is marginalized and demonized. It can also be conveniently blamed for the
economic, moral and political woes of that region.”
(See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_cleansing )

Therefore, it is criminal to intimidate the population of a nation or state, for the

destructive impact of terrorism on human rights and security has been recognized at the
highest levels of the United Nations as unlawful, notably, by the Security Council, the

98
General Assembly, the former Commission on Human Rights and the new Human
Rights Council 7. Specifically, Member States have set out that terrorism:

“Threatens the dignity and security of human beings everywhere, endangers

or takes innocent lives, creates an environment that destroys the freedom
from fear of the people, jeopardizes fundamental freedoms, and aims at the
destruction of human rights;”
and…

“Has links with transnational organized crime, drug trafficking, money-

laundering and trafficking in arms, as well as illegal transfers of nuclear,
chemical and biological materials, and is linked to the consequent commission
of serious crimes such as murder, extortion, kidnapping, assault, hostage-
taking and robbery;”

There are many Foreign and Domestic Corporations, Organizations and Associations
under many different names, faces and mask. But suffice it to say, those mentioned in
the 76th CONGRESS, THIRD SESSION – Steps Toward British Union, a World
State, and International Strife- Part I – IX (1940)” are by far the primary parties of
interest, via interlocking directorates, etc., are recognizable by their fruits!
They are now running the world’s show through their International Arena and are on the
record bragging about the same. Remember we shall know them by their “Fruits!” Worst
of all, they (The Foreign Alien Enemies) of our several states, collectively known as
America, have deceived US, (We, The People) into financing (via taxation) their
“HOLY WAR” against US (We, The People).

These Foreign Alien Enemies of our people have infiltrated our Government (both local
state and federal) at the highest levels, our Schools, our Colleges/Universities, our
Churches/Religious Institutions, our Banks, our Treasuries, our Armed Forces, our largest
Corporations and the like.

It is stated best by Vattel, to wit:

“If he (the sovereign) puts justice and duty first, if he aspires to the lofty and
immortal honor of being the father of his people, let him distrust the selfish
suggestions of the minister who represents to him as rebels all citizens who
do not hold out their hands to the chains of slavery and who refuse to bow
without a murmur under the rod of a despotic rule.”(See: Vattel, Book III, §
290)

and…

“The surest method of appeasing seditions, and at the same time the most just
one, is to satisfy the grievances of the people! If they have revolted without
cause, which perhaps is never the case, …” (See: Vattel, Book III § 291)

The true parties responsible for the “HOLY WAR” upon America, are here known as
“Pilgrims”. The attached 28 page Congressional Investigation done by the “76th
CONGRESS, THIRD SESSION – Steps Toward British Union, a World State, and

99
International Strife-Part I – IX (1940)” clearly describes their intent to overthrow the
Sovereignty of the united States of America, further bragging that their “plans will not
be stopped by any U.S. President, Congressman or otherwise”! They are furthering,
promoting and financing the “HOLY WAR” upon America!

Wherefore, it is criminal to intimidate the population of a nation or state, for the

destructive impact of terrorism on human rights and security has been recognized at the
highest level of the United Nations as unlawful, notably, by the Security Council, the
General Assembly, the former Commission on Human Rights and the new Human Rights
Council 7. Specifically, Member States have set out that terrorism:

“Threatens the dignity and security of human beings everywhere, endangers

or takes innocent lives, creates an environment that destroys the freedom
from fear of the people, jeopardizes fundamental freedoms, and aims at the
destruction of human rights;”

and…

“Has links with transnational organized crime, drug trafficking, money-

laundering and trafficking in arms, as well as illegal transfers of nuclear,
chemical and biological materials, and is linked to the consequent commission
of serious crimes such as murder, extortion, kidnapping, assault, hostage-
taking and robbery;”

The CIA - The World Factbook holds the answers regarding the Transnational drug
trafficking and who is over its premier money laundering centers and where they are. But
first let’s look to the free internationally recognized encyclopedia which is known as
Wikipedia for other definitions pertaining to crimes committed against a nations own
people in criminal and unlawful acts of terrorism, to wit:

“State-sponsored terrorism is a term used to describe terrorism sponsored by

nation-states . As with terrorism, the precise definition, and the identification
of particular examples, are subjects of heated political dispute. In general
state-sponsored terrorism is associated with paramilitary . It is also
frequently used in conjunction with state terrorism , which is (an accusation
of) terrorism committed by governments .”
(See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State-sponsored_terrorism )

and…

“A death squad is an armed military, police, insurgent, or terrorist squad

that conducts extrajudicial killings , assassinations, and forced
disappearances of persons as part of a war, insurgency or terror campaign.
These killings are often conducted in ways meant to ensure the secrecy of the
killers' identities, so as to avoid accountability.

Death squads are often, but not exclusively, associated with the violent
political repression under dictatorships, totalitarian states and similar
regimes. They typically have the tacit or express support of the state, as a
whole or in part (see state terrorism ). Death squads may comprise a secret
police force, paramilitary group or official government units with members

100
 drawn from the military or the police. They may also be organized as
vigilante groups.”
(See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_Squads )

and…

“An extrajudicial killing is the killing of a person by governmental authorities

without the sanction of any judicial proceeding or legal process.
Extrajudicial punishments are by their nature unlawful, since they bypass the
due process of the legal jurisdiction in which they occur. Extrajudicial
killings often target leading political, trade union, dissident, religious, and
social figures and may be carried out by the state government or other state
authorities like the armed forces and police.”
(See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extrajudicial_killing )

WOW, I guess we now have a clearer understanding of the true nature of the responsible
parties, which are not middle eastern people, but rather THEY ARE THE TRAITEROUS
AND SEDITIOUS LOYALIST TO ENGLAND, WHOM HAVE BEEN LIVING HERE
AMONGST US EVER SINCE THE JOHN JAY PEACE TREATIES!!! I believe the
following quotation will further clarify this matter much further for us all, to wit:

“It is patently impossible to discuss social engineering or the automation of a

society, i.e., the engineering of social automation systems (silent weapons) on
a national scale without implying extensive objectives of social control and
destruction of human life, i.e., slavery and genocide.

This manual is in itself an analog declaration of intent. Such a writing must

be secured from public scrutiny. Otherwise, it might be recognized as a
technically formal declaration of domestic war. Furthermore, whenever any
person or group of persons in a position of great power, and without the full
knowledge and consent of the public, uses such knowledge and methodology
for economic conquest – it must be understood that a state of domestic
warfare exist between said person or group of persons and the public.”
(See: attached EXHIBIT: Top Secret Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars
Operations Research Technical Manual 7905.1 at Pg. 6 under the title
‘Security’)

The United States Code at 18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy, states as
follows:

“If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction
of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the
Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the
authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of
the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United
States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or
imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.”
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–
322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

101
The attached Congressional Investigation, ET AL;, is summary judgment evidence of the
parties and their many corporations in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 2384 to the extent that
the facts and the parties, including their summery judgment guilt is undeniably admitted.

These expatriated aliens, under pretext and pretense of UNITED STATES (marshal,
treasury, attorney, etc.), were then given weapons/arms and ordered to take, seize, steal,
and trespass upon the property and rights to property of the Citizens of the several
Republican States of the Union, constituting an act of invasion, war, insurrection and
rebellion by NATIONAL LOYALIST of Foreign Powers and their Officers, Agents and
their loyal Subjects to the CROWN, to the U.N.; and to the HOLY SEE (“The Permanent
Observer” at the U.N.). (See: Constitution for the United States of America (1787),
Article III, Section 3, Article IV, Section 4)

A further objective of the International Organizations was to disarm the Militia (See:
Constitution for the United States of America (1787), Amendment II, 10 U.S.C.A. 31),
the free born Natural Citizens of the several Republican States of the Union (See: A New
World Order, pgs. 11-12), a viable deterrent to a furtherance of their fraudulent, arbitrary
international activities, armed pacific settlements, and covinous, seditious agreements and
associations.

These foreign aliens were further authorized by Congress to enter into our State Police,
under pretense of the “Police Corp And Law Enforcement Training And Education Act”,
Title I of the Omnibus Crime Control And Safe Streets Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C.A. 3711, et
seq). Section 2405 of the amended Act subtitled “Selection of Participants” declared:

“(A) IN GENERAL – Participants in State Police Corps programs shall be selected on a

competitive basis by each State under regulations prescribed by the Director.
(a) Selection Criteria And Qualifications. – (1) In order to participate in a State Police
Corps program, a participant must –

(A) be a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in
the United States.” (See: Exhibit N-9, Congressional Record – House, October 22, 1991, pg.
H8154)

The alien, inter-agency INTERPOL operations can and do obtain information on Citizens
and their families even though no specific criminal incident has occurred, and use
numerous documents to access and obtain information, including but not limited to,
social security numbers, passports, drivers licenses, vehicle registration, finger prints,
medical and dental records, bank accounts, and numerous other inter-agency records,
indexes and files (See: Exhibit N-10, GAO Briefing Report, Role of Interpol and the U.S.
National Central Bureau, GAO/GGD-87-93BR, pgs. 2, 3, 17, 18), and claims exclusion
and immunity from Freedom of Information Act, and the Privacy Act of 1974, 5
U.S.C.A. § 552, and numerous other domestic Laws. (See: Executive Order No. 12425,
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 5.4)

The Internal Revenue Service, being represented members of INTERPOL, also uses
telephone numbers through the “Automated Collection System (ACS)” to access files.

102
(See: GAO Report to the Joint Committee on Taxation, U.S. Congress, “Tax
Administration”, Extent and Causes of Erroneous Levies, December 1990, GAO/GGD-
91-9, pg. 1) The inter-agency, international Law merchants and their factors had
obtained access to all facets of anyone’s private life, affairs and their property, whether
corporeal or incorporeal in their nature.

Those of alien character and certain expatriates had declared themselves above the Law
of Nations or of any particular Nation/State. The Principal/Sovereign, “WE THE
PEOPLE” formed, ordained and established the several Republican States and Union and
empowered our Public Office for the primary, express purposes and reservations set forth
in the “Preamble”, (See: U.S. vs. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 588, pg. 590, Colorado Anti-
Discrimination Commission vs. Case, 380 P.2d 34) and as clearly stated by Alexander
Hamilton in Federalist Papers No. 84:

“It has been several times truly remarked that the bills of rights are in their origin,
stipulations between kings and their subjects, abridgments of prerogative in favor of their
privilege, reservations of rights not surrendered to the prince. Such was Magna Carta,
obtained by the barons, sword in hand, from King John. Such were the subsequent
confirmations of that charter by subsequent princes. Such was the Petition of Right assented
to by Charles the First in the beginning of his reign. Such, also, was the Declaration of Right
presented by the Lords of Commons to the Prince of Orange in 1688, and afterwards thrown
into the form of an act of Parliament called the Bill of Rights. It is evident, therefore, that,
according to their primitive significance, they have no application to constitutions,
professedly founded upon the power of the people and executed by their immediate to their
primitive signification, they have no application to constitutions, professedly founded upon
the power of the people and executed by their immediate representatives and servants.
Here, in strictness, the people surrender nothing; and as they retain everything they have no
need of particular reservations. “WE THE PEOPLE of the United States, to secure the
blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this constitution
for the United States of America.” Here is a better recognition of popular rights than
volumes of aphorisms which make the principle figure in several of our States bills of rights
and which would sound much better in a treaties of ethics than in a constitution of
government.”

One cannot disparage, impair, abrogate, or diminish the Liberties, Rights, Privileges or
Immunities of another, without necessarily diminishing their own and that of their
Posterity. Wholly ignoring the prime directive, the contrived “Emergency” usurpations
and abridgments are of the same general character and reaction. “In the general course of
human nature, a power over a man’s substance amounts to a power over his will.” (See:
Federalist Papers No. 79) The adverse affects and intent reached far beyond the
misrepresented exigency.

“…the full meaning of that word “emergency” related to far more than banks: it covered the
whole economic and therefore whole social structure of the country. It was an emergency
that went to the roots of our agriculture, our commerce, and our industry; it was an
emergency that existed for a whole generation in its underlying causes and for three and
one-half years in its viable effects. It could be cured only by a complete reorganization and a
measure of control of the economic structure. It could not be cured in a week, in a month, or
a year. It called for a long series of new laws, new measures affecting different subjects; but
all of them component parts of a fairly broad plan. Most of all it called for readiness and
understanding on the part of the people. We could never go back to the old order.” (See: A

103
 Brief History Of The Emergency Powers In The United States, A working paper prepared
for the Special Committee on National Emergencies and Delegated Emergency Powers, U.S.
Senate, 93rd Congress, 2nd Session, July 1974, pg. 56, citing F.D. Roosevelt)

The de facto “state” willfully ignored the express prohibitions on numerous occasions
and counts. The Department of Treasury, under purported direction and authority of the
office of governor have in fact lent and pledged the faith and credit of the State and
assumed responsibility for the debts, liabilities and obligations of others, and further,
have invested in such operations as the International Bank For Reconstruction And
Development.

The de facto “state” did and does now have a financial interest in the fraudulent and
deceptive practices and the de facto inter-agency, international operations, not to mention
the fact that the de facto agents are remunerated for their illicit acts by non-redeemable,
non-current warrants (Bills of Credit) drawn on the fiscal and depository agent of “The
Fund” and “The Bank”, and use the public Offices to fraudulently force their illicit law
merchant obligations and substitutions off on others, while knowing well that they are
passing “Worthless Securities”. Furthermore, they are not recognized Dollar for $1.00
as they claim.

Moreover, A Dollar is defined as Gold and Silver Coin; and today the FRN ($1.00) can
neither purchase a One Ounce U.S. Silver Eagle (Dollar), one cannot purchase with a
single FRN ($1.00), therefore, “They” do not recognize a Dollar for $1.00 ratio.
Furthermore, they don’t even recognize their own FRN’s $1.00 for $1.00, as is further
evidenced herein.

Because they charge a fee and usury for every single FRN put into circulation. Now
seeing as they don’t print the FRN’s to enable folks to pay back both, the principle and
the entrust, the entrust is therefore added to the Nation’s National Debt. This is the
evidence that the FRN’s “ARE NOT RECOGNIZED ($1.00 for $1.00)”.

Let us now elaborate further upon the facts just spoken of above. when they created and
printed the FRN ($1.00), and thereafter, putting the same into circulation, while knowing
they didn’t create the fee amount (USURY) attached to the FRN’s. The Federal Reserve
Banks, along with the Board Members thereof, are all, well aware that the debts owed on
the Federal Reserve Notes couldn’t possibly be repaid by using the same FRN’s.

The ugly truth of the matter, is that those associated with the Federal Reserve Banks
know for a FACT, that the USURY they charge for printing FRN’s and putting them into
circulation economically impossible to EVER REPAY. That is to say, without removing
the same FRN’s which the USURY is attached to from circulation. For the Society who
is forced to use the FRN’s (their lives become likened very much to a game of musical
chairs).

That is right, they already know, prior to even printing the said notes, that the USURY is
100% impossible to repay by any other means than Foreclosure, Confiscation of Private

104
Property, Bankruptcy, or the like damages and injuries. The USURY is merely added to
the insolvent nature of our National debt.

So, with regards to that which is spent by the government, even if The People took every
FRN back from those whom they paid using the same, even then, they still wouldn’t have
the sufficient amount of FRN’s necessary to repay the fees and usury. Therefore, it is
calculated as a Government Deficit (i.e. money owed to the banks by the government,
which the Government cannot repay; and for which the Public Housing has been pledged
in promise to pay)!

Hence, the reason even those whose homes are paid off, yet still, they only hold a
“Certificate of Title” and NOT the “Allodial Title”, nor lawful Title Deed and it is also
how either Fanny Mae, or Freddy Mac (Government Owned Banks always end up
holding the Home and Property loans on the peoples home mortgages, after having
purchased said loans from the original lender.

As such, having violated the fundamental Law of the Land and the de jure State and
Forum, and breaching numerous duties imposed upon our public Offices by law. Those
holding, enjoying and wrongfully exercising our Public Offices of Honor, Trust and
Profit determined that it was in their de facto providence to further violate the
fundamental Constitution For the State of Colorado, Article III, Section 30, and deposit
and pay all fees, etc. into their Foreign Organizations “fiscal and depository agency.” 22
U.S.C.A. 286d, (See also, Exhibit C–5 , Public Law 95-147, 91 Stat. 1227)

“There is no position which depends on clearer principle than that every act of a delegated
authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised is void. No
legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this would be
to affirm that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above the master;
that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting
by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they
forbid.” (See: Federalist Papers No. 78, Alexander Hamilton)

The government by becoming a corporator, (See: 22 U.S.C.A. 286e) lays down its
sovereignty and takes on that of a private citizen. It can exercise no power which is not
derived from the corporate charter. (See: The Bank of the United States vs. Planters
Bank of Georgia, 6 L.Ed. (9 Wheat 244), F.H.A. vs. Burr, 309 U.S. 242) The real
character of the party in interest is not the de jure “United States of America” or “State”,
but rather, “The Bank” and “The Fund.” (See: 22 U.S.C.A. 286, et seq.)

The exercise of delegated Power to regulate commerce (See: Constitution for the United
States of America, Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) and the act of engaging in commerce
are two different acts, and those dealing with “The Bank” and “The Fund” act “under and
according to its charter.” (See: Osborn vs. The Bank of the United States, 6 L.Ed. (9
Wheat) 204, pg. 220, 22 U.S.C.A. 286q)

The continual commission and enforcement of such acts are committed under false and
fraudulent pretenses and impersonations (See: 18 U.S.C.A. 219, 18 U.S.C.A. 912, 18
U.S.C.A. 951), colors (See: 18 U.S.C.A. 241), fraud (See: 18 U.S.C.A. 1001), liens,

105
assessment, dispossession, alienation, seizures (See: 18 U.S.C.A. 645, 18 U.S.C.A. 654),
force, threat of force and expropriation (See: 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 2384, 2385), and many
times are done under “Letters of Marque and Reprisal”, i.e. “recapture.” (See: 31
U.S.C.A. 5323)

and…

“Such principles as Fraud and Justice never dwell together” (See: Wingate’s Maxims 680),

“A right of action cannot arise out of fraud” (See: Broom’s Maxims 297, Cowper’s Reports
343, 5 Scott’s New Reports 558, 10 Mass. 276, 38 Fed. 800), are too high of a thought
concept, as is “Due Process”, “Just Compensation”, and “Justice” itself.

Honor is earned by honesty and integrity, not under false and fraudulent pretenses, nor
will the color of the cloth one wears, nor fine spun illicit prevarications, cover-up, and
conceal the usurpations, lies, frauds, trickery and deceit. When Black is fraudulently
declared to be White, not all will live in darkness. (Isaiah 5:20-23) As astutely observed
by Will Rogers, “there are men running governments who shouldn’t be allowed to play
with matches”, and is as applicable today as Jesus’ statements about Lawyers. (See:
Bible, Luke 11:42, Luke 11:52)

The contrived “emergency” has created numerous abuses and usurpations, and
abridgments of delegated Powers and Authority. As stated in Senate Report No. 93-549:

“Since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency.
In fact, there are now in effect four presidentially proclaimed states of national emergency:
In addition to the national emergency declared by President Roosevelt in 1933, there are also
the national emergency proclaimed by President Truman on December 16, 1950, during the
Korean conflict, and the states of national emergency declared by President Nixon on March
23, 1970, and August 15, 1971.

These proclamations give force to 470 provisions of Federal Law. These hundreds of
statutes delegate to the President extraordinary powers, ordinarily exercised by the
Congress, which affect the lives of American citizens in a host of all-encompassing manners.
This vast range of powers, taken together, confer enough authority to rule the country
without reference to normal constitutional process.

Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may: seize property; organize
and control the means of production; seize commodities; assign military forces abroad;
institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication; regulate the
operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and in a plethora of particular ways, control
the lives of all American citizens.” (See: Foreword, pg. III)

The “Introduction”, on page 1, begins with a phenomenal declaration, to wit:

“A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of their lives under emergency
rule. For 40 years, freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution
have in varying degrees been abridged by laws brought into force by states of national
emergency…”

106
The research done in 16 American Jurisprudence, 2nd Edition, Constitutional Law, §§ 71,
82, states no “emergency” justifies a violation of any Constitutional provision. (See
also: In Re: Powell, 602 P.2d 711 (1979), Home Bldg & Loan Assn. vs. Blaisdell, 290
U.S. 398 (1933)) Arguendo, “Supremacy Clause” and “Separation of Powers”, it is
clearly admitted in Senate Report No. 93-549 that abridgment has occurred.

The statements heard in the federal and state Tribunals, on numerous occasions, that
Constitutional arguments are “immaterial”, “frivolous” etc., is based upon the
concealment, furtherance and compounding of the Frauds, Usurpations an “Emergency”
created and sustained by the “Expatriates” and “Alien” agents of the United Nations and
its Organizations, Corporations and Associations. (See: 60 Stat. 1401, Article IX,
Section 8(ii), at pg. 1414, also see, Letter, Insight Magazine, February 18, 1991, pg. 7,
Lowell L. Flanders, President, U.N. Staff Union, New York)

8 U.S.C.A. 1481 is one of the controlling statutes on expatriation, as is 22 U.S.C.A. §§§

611, 612, 613 and 50 U.S.C.A. 781, and unless one expatriates and wears the badge of
the United Nations Organizations, they are to be selectively and continually subjected to
fraud, extortion, dispossession, embezzlement, alienation, expropriation and extradited
into Foreign Jurisdictions, maliciously prosecuted under undisclosed Foreign Laws, or
any number of other injuries, damages and evils which manifest themselves from the
arbitrary minds of those who have forsaken and disavowed their allegiance to the Nation,
State and People. (See: Letter July 24, 1991, Department of Treasury/Internal Revenue
Service, to Jay Depew, also see, A New World Order, Essays On Restructuring The
United Nations)

The present operation of the de facto government is under Foreign/Alien Constitutions,

Agreements, Pactions, Charters, Laws, Rules, Policies and Regulations. The overthrow of
the “essential engine” declared in and by the ordained and established Constitution for
the United States of America (1787), and by and under the “Bill of Rights (1791) is
obvious.

The covert procedures used to implement and enforce these Foreign Constitutions, Laws,
Procedures, Rules, Regulations, etc., is in direct contravention to the Law of our Land
and Forum, in wanton breach of express and conditional duties, in excess of delegated
authority, in felonious violation of our Law, evidencing gross moral turpitude, breach of
faith, obligations, malfeasance, and willful and knowledgeable violation of Public Policy
as declared by WE THE PEOPLE, the Principal, the sovereign, the superior Creditor, the
Heirs in Law, and as against the Laws of the Creator, the Laws of Nature and the Peace,
Dignity and Security of the Citizens, and our Posterity.

The foreign paramilitary control over the de facto departments and agencies, acting under
purported doctrines of “Emergency” and “Necessity”, which has no law (See:
Plowden’s 18, 15 Viner’s Abridgments 534, 22 Viner’s Abridgments 540, also see, U.S.
vs. Will, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, pg. 405), should resolve the question of why the
Executive/Admiralty flag is displayed in the court rooms in opposition to the lawful
National flag (See: Executive Order No. 10834, Part II, 4 U.S.C.A. 1, Executive Order

107
No. 12778), and why the Executive Seal is displayed in the (world) federal courts in
opposition to that of the Judicial Seal. (See: Seals And Other Devises, GPO Publication
250.3, Executive – pg. 22, Judicial – pg. 57)

The International Organizational intents, purposes and activities include complete control
of “Public Finance”, i.e. “control, supervision, and audit of indigenous fiscal resources;
budget practices, taxation, expenditures of public funds, currency issues, and banking
agencies and affiliates.” (See: FM 41-10, pgs. 2-30 thru 2-31, Section 2-51) This of
course complies with “Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars”, Research Technical
Manual, TM-SW7905.1, which discloses a declaration of war upon the American
people, to wit:

“This manual is in itself an analog declaration of intent. Such a writing must be secured
from public scrutiny. Otherwise it might be recognized as a technically formal declaration
of domestic war. Furthermore, whenever any person or group of persons in a position of
great power, and without the consent of the public, uses such knowledge and methodology
for economic conquest – it must be understood that a state of domestic warfare exists
between said person or group of persons and the public…” (See: pg. 3)

“CONSEQUENTLY, in the interest of future world order, peace, and tranquility, it was
decided to privately wage a quiet war against the American public with an ultimate objective
of permanently shifting the natural and social energy (wealth) of the undisciplined and
irresponsible many into the hands of the self-disciplined, responsible, and worthy few.” (See:
pg. 7)

It boils down to monetary control by the Internationals & High Contracting Parties,
through information etc., solicited and collected by the Internal Revenue Service:

“A silent weapons system operates upon data obtained from a docile public by legal (but not
always lawful) force. Much information is made available to silent weapons programmers
through the Internal Revenue Service. (See: Studies in the Structure of the American
Economy for an I.R.S. source list.) This information consists of the enforced delivery of well
organized data contained in federal and state forms collected, assembled, and submitted by
slave labor provided by the taxpayer and employers.” (See: supra, pg. 48, also see,
Executive Order No. 10033, 22 U.S.C.A. 286f, also see, GAO Briefing Report to the
Chairman, Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights, Committee on the Judiciary,
U.S. House of Representatives, June 1987, GAO/GGD-87-92BR “Counterterrorism”, pg. 17,
18)

Furthermore, as aforesaid, who is aiding, abetting, counseling, commanding, procuring

and enforcing the seditious International programs and policies. (See: supra, pg. 52, 18
U.S.C.A. 2, 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 2384, 2385)

The mis-education of the masses and in particular the minor children having been
effectively implemented; the three distinct Departments, the Executive, Legislative and
Judicial being essentially compromised and covertly confederated, consolidated, usurped
and overthrown; left only skeletal remains and deceptive rhetorical smoke. The
worthless, empty and deceitful words of sycophants, pettifoggers, and drone of political
hacks had done virtually irreparable injury, damage and harm. Only the institution and
providence of the jury was left to be disfigured, discredited and dismantled. The jury

108
institution of Citizens historically retained immense control, Power and Authority over
public justice and those operating under pretense or colors of authority, power or
privilege. As stated by Sir William Blackstone:

“Here therefore, a competent number of sensible and upright jurymen, chosen from among
those of middle rank, will be found to be the best investigators of truth, and be found the
surest guardians of public justice. For the most powerful individuals in the state will be
cautious of committing any flagrant invasion of another’s right, when he knows that the fact
of his oppression must be examined and decided by twelve indifferent men, not appointed till
the hour of trial; and that, when once the fact is ascertained, the law of course must redress
it. This therefore preserves in the hands of the people that share which they ought to have in
the administration of public justice, and prevents the encroachment of the powerful and
wealthy without intervention of the jury (whether composed of Justices of the Peace,
Commissioners of the Revenue, Judges of a Court of Conscience, or any other standing
magistrate) is a step towards establishing aristocracy, the most oppressive of absolute
governments.”

and…

“It is, therefore, upon the whole, a duty every man owes his country, his friends, his
posterity, and himself, to maintain to the utmost of his power this valuable constitution in all
its rights; to restore it to its ancient dignity, if at all impaired by different value of property,
or otherwise deviated from its first institution; to amend it, whenever it is defective; and,
above all, to guard with most jealous circumspect against the introductions of new and
arbitrary methods of trial, which, under a variety of possible pretenses, may in time
imperceptibly undermine the best preservation of English liberty.

Upon these accounts, the trial by jury ever has been, and I trust ever will be, looked upon as
the glory of English law. And if it has so great an advantage over others, in regulating civil
property, how much must that advantage be heightened, when it is applied in criminal
cases…It is the most transcendent privilege which any subject can enjoy, or wish for, that he
cannot be affected in his property, his liberty, or his person, but by the unanimous consent of
twelve of his neighbors and equals. A constitution, that I may venture to affirm has, under
providence, secured the just liberties of this nation for a long succession of ages. And
therefore a celebrated French writer, who concluded, that because Rome, Sparta, and
Carthage have lost their liberties, therefore those of England in time must perish, should
have recollected that Rome, Sparta and Carthage, at the time when their liberties were lost,
were strangers to the trial by jury.” (See: Blackstone’s Commentaries, Vol. 1)

The people forming and ratifying our ordained Constitution(s) knew of and had
experienced massive and gross abuses of powers, authority, characters, franchises, etc.,
and having provided for Trial by Jury in all criminal cases, pursuant to the Constitution
for the United States of America, Article III, Section 2, Clause 3, and yet feeling a lack of
confidence and trust, presented the “Resolution Of The First Congress Submitting
Twelve Amendments To The Constitution”, on March 4, 1789, and declared that:

“The Convention of a number of States, having at the time of their adopting the
Constitution, expressed a desire, in order TO PREVENT MISCONSTRUCTION, OR
ABUSE OF ITS POWERS, that further DECLARATORY AND RESTRICTIVE CLAUSES
SHOULD BE ADDED: and as extending the ground of public confidence in the
Government, will best secure the beneficent ends of its institution.”

109
Among these “declaratory and restrictive clauses” were Articles of Amendment I,
reserving to the People, among other things, the Right to Assemble and to Petition the
Government for redress of grievance; Amendment V, not to be held for a capital or
otherwise infamous crime unless on PRESENTMENT or INDICTMENT of a GRAND
JURY; nor deprived of Life, Liberty or Property, without due process of Law; nor having
their private property taken for public use, WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION;
Amendment VI, the Right to a speedy and public trial, BY AN IMPARTIAL JURY OF
THE STATE AND DISTRICT where the crime is alleged to have been committed;
Amendment VII, in suits at common Law, where the value in controversy exceeds
twenty “DOLLARS”, the RIGHT OF TRIAL BY JURY SHALL BE PRESERVED, and
NO FACT TRIED BY A JURY shall be otherwise RE-EXAMINED IN ANY COURT
OF THE UNITED STATES THAN ACCORDING TO THE RULES OF COMMON
LAW; Amendment IX, reservation of UN-ENUMERATED RIGHTS RETAINED BY
THE PEOPLE; Amendment X, reservation of POWERS to the States or to the People.

The Grand Jury being chosen by the de facto agents, who themselves being venal
subjects and Agents of Foreign Principals and Powers, and woefully compromised,
would in all probability choose (voir dire) a “homage jury” of questionable character,
allegiance and array. (See: Exhibit P-5, U.S. vs. Ralph Daigle, Case No. 92 CR 80161,
Transcript of Hearing, Monday, April 20, 1992, pg. 28, lines 22 – 24) Expatriates,
Denizens and Aliens are excluded from setting on said juries as a matter of fundamental
Law. (See: 3 American Jurisprudence 2d, Alien and Citizen, § 40)

The issue that the Law retains the remedial RIGHT to the accused to voir dire the Grand
Jurors, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. 1867(a) & (b), and by Federal Rules of Criminal
Procedure, Rule 6(b), has and remains ineffectual due to the indolence of the members of
the Bar. It is simple reasoning that where the Law says that a particular act, such as voir
dire, is within the procedural due process scope and purview of the Act, and the members
of the Bar refuse to take cognizance or accent to its mandate, it is as if no such law was
passed or ever existed, and upon coram non judice determination, quasi repeal or
amendments could be effectively implemented. As recognized and stated by Thomas
Jefferson over two hundred (200) years ago:

“One single object, if your proposed code of Laws attains it, will entitle you to the endless
gratitude of society: that of restraining judges from usurping legislation. And with no body
of men is this restraint more wanting than with the Judges of what is called our general
Government, but what I call our Foreign Department. They are practicing on the
Constitution by inferences, analogies, and sophisms as they would ordinary law. They do
not seem aware that it is not even a Constitution, formed by a single authority and subject to
a single superintendence and control; but that it is a compact of many independent powers,
every one of which claims an equal right to understand it, and require its observance…They
imagine they can lead us into a consolidated government, while their road leads directly to
its dissolution. This member of the Government was first considered as the most harmless
and helpless of all its organs. But has proved, that the power of declaring what the law is ad
libitum, by sapping and mining slyly and without alarm, the foundations of the Constitution,
can do what no open force would dare to attempt.” (See: Thomas Jefferson, Albert E.
Bergh, (1907), Volume 15, pg. 331)

110
The “Jury”, a viable and independent “institution” of the de jure Government, was not yet
wholly impaired nor compromised, and being arrayed of “IMPARTIAL” citizens “OF
THE STATE AND DISTRICT” wherein the act was allegedly committed, the Citizens
retained certain substantial control and powers. (See: Constitution for the United States
of America, Amendment VI) Trial by Jury was considered by all members of the
Constitutional Convention to be “a valuable safeguard to liberty” or “the palladium of
free government”, and was “esteemed useful or essential in a REPRESENTATIVE
REPUBLIC” and “a barrier to tyranny.”

An “impartial jury” chosen from the Citizens “of the State and District” was and is
mandatory in all criminal cases pursuant to the Constitution for the United States of
America, Article III, Section 2, Clause 3, and under the declaratory and restrictive clauses
of Articles of Amendments VI, and further, was expressly preserved by Amendment VII
“in Suits at common Law.”

“For my own part, the more the operation of the institution (jury) has fallen under my
observation, the more reason I have discovered for holding it in high estimation; and it
would be altogether superfluous to examine to what extent it deserves to be esteemed useful
or essential in a Representative Republic, or against the oppression of an hereditary
monarch than as a barrier to the tyranny of popular magistrates in a popular government.
Discussions of this kind would be more curious than beneficial, as all are satisfied of the
utility of the institution, and its friendly aspect to liberty…Arbitrary impeachments,
arbitrary methods of prosecuting pretended offenses, and arbitrary punishments upon
arbitrary convictions have ever appeared to me to be the engine of judicial despotism…”
(See: Federalist Papers No. 83)

The prospective jurors of the Petit Juries are many times summoned upon the basis of
“license” issued by the de facto “state”, which admits of permission to engage in a
particular business or occupation, and may very well be within and under other
confederations, alliances or pactions, such as the “Drivers License Compact.” Other
engagements, agreements, entitlements, etc., might readily admit of Foreign or
International character, bias, prejudice, interest or fear of reprisal.

The Social Security (totalization) Agreement 42 U.S.C.A. 433 would be of such foreign
subordinate subjection and character, especially considering that certain assessments
made under the International Agreements (unilateral) are fraudulently declared not to be
subject to Article I, Section 8, Clause 9, Tribunals, nor Article III Judicial Power Courts,
pursuant to 26 I.R.C. 6305(b). Such documents as a Voters Registration admit of the
status of U.S. Citizens, who were not afforded the elective franchise, as were free born,
natural Citizens of the several free, independent, sovereign, Republican States of the
Union. (See: U.S. vs. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 588)

The jury, usually being precluded from its providence of “Jury Nullification”, i.e., to rule
on the law, is further limited to knowledge and foundations of Law as espoused only by
the members of the “closed union shop” Bar. Other times, especially where a Citizen is
appearing without a member of the Bar Association as a Carte blanch representative, the
jurors are summarily excluded from knowing of or entertaining affirmative defenses, etc.,
irrespective of the facts or Law. (See Exhibit P-3 , Special problems In Handling Pro Se

111
Litigation, Workshop For Judges Of The Seventh Circuit, Notre Dame, Indiana, October
16 – 18, 1989)

The Jurors are thereby reduced in their Rights, Duty and providence to a mere “advisory
jury” (See: F.R.C.P. Rule 39(c) ), to the prejudice of one of the parties to the action. The
Jury then becomes the mere tool of the “closed union shop”, and can be influenced to
use the same said power and impaired providence “for whatever the market will bear.”
(See: Exhibit D-4 , Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars, pg. 52)

The reason and rules of common Law having been unlawfully abolished and usurped by
the de facto legislative/quasi judicial fiat, left the substantive and adjective Rights of the
Citizen without redress or remedy, and effectively left the provisions of Articles of
Amendment VII, to wit, “no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any
Court of the United States, than according to the rules of common law”, as empty and
senseless words. (See: F.R.Cr.P. Rule 26)

Certain associations of the Bar, apparently not wishing to show a discrimination, equally
infringed upon all Citizens, and thereby unconstitutionally abrogated and usurped the
Rights and Powers as expressly reserved by and to WE THE PEOPLE under authority of
the duly ordained and established Constitution for the United States of America,
Amendments IX and X and as reiterated and incorporated in the Constitution for the State
of Colorado, Article I, Section 1, 2, and 29 to wit:

“AMENDMENT IX. The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be
construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”

“AMENDMENT X. The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor
prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

As recognized by statesmen such as Thomas Jefferson:

“It would be a dangerous delusion were a confidence in the men of our choice to silence our
fears for the safety of our rights; that confidence is everywhere the parent of despotism; free
government is founded in jealousy , and not in confidence; it is jealousy, and not confidence
which prescribes limited Constitutions to bind down those whom we are obliged to trust with
power; that our Constitution has accordingly fixed the limits to which, and no further may
our confidence may go…In questions of Power, then let no more be heard of confidence in
man…” (See: The Annuls Of America, Alder, et al., Volume 4, pgs. 65 – 66)

By abridging the providence and power of the Jury, the way was clear for reinstitution of
Star Chamber Summary Proceedings. Summary pre-disposition of issues “TO
CONFORM TO A TREND OF JUDICIAL DETERMINATIONS” and “TO
ACCOMPLISH SIMILAR OBJECTIVES,” was not only plausible but effectively
implemented. Usurpations and even heinous acts could be committed and concealed
from adjudication to the prejudice, damage, injury and public endangerment of the
Citizen and their Posterity.

112
 According to the policy “Report To The Attorney General, Truth In Criminal Justice
Series, Report No. 5 (See: Exhibit P-5 ), the power and authority of the Judicial Power
Court to review and curb certain Executive Branch activities was and is an unauthorized
intrusion by the judicial Branch. A “Dictatorship” not only over finance and money, but
over every facet of life, Liberty and Property.

“Show me that age and country where the rights and liberties of the people were placed on
the sole chance of their rulers being good men, without consequent loss of liberty! I say that
the loss of that dearest privilege has ever followed, with absolute certainty, every such made
attempt.” (See: Debates in The Several State Conventions On the Adoption Of The
Federal Constitution, Johnathan Elliot Ed., Vol. 3, pg. 59)

The Constitutional office of a lawful, Constitutional, Article III judicial power Judge
being debauched and usurped, and the individuals holding and exercising the Office no
longer qualifying as Officers or employees of the United States of America, and receiving
their remunerations from the foreign/alien financial institution(s), namely, the
International Monetary Fund (established 22 July 1944 as UN specialized agency) (See:
CIA Fact Book 1995-96, pg. 469) or its subsidiary Organizations, Corporations or
Associations, as deceitfully and craftily designated as the UNITED STATES
TREASURY (See: Exhibit M-7 , Cromelin vs. U.S., 177 F2d. 275, Exhibit C-3 , Public
Law 94-564, Legislative history, pg. 5967, 22 U.S.C.A. 286a (d) (1) ).

The stage was set for the overthrow of the Constitutional, Judicial Power Courts and
implementations of diverse, de facto, legislative Article I, Section 8, Clause 9,
Administrative/Executive Tribunals, and the establishment of a fourth (4 th) branch of
government (See: 1 American Jurisprudence 2d, Administrative Law § 78, Exhibit M-8 ,
Executive Order No. 12778, October 23, 1991, Federal Register, Volume 56, No. 207)
where a non-Article III Administrative Law Judge or Commissioner sets under
pretense of “judge.” (See: Judicial Improvement Act of 1990, Public Law 101-650,
Legislative History, pg. 6877, Exhibit M-6 , Terry J. Hatter, Jr., et al. vs. U.S., Case No.
91-5039, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Decision, January 16, 1992,
footnote, pg. 2, UNDER International Agreements (See: U.S. vs. Ferreira, 13 Howard
42), and thereby assumes the role of prosecutor, accuser, judge and jury, and is
consistent with the term and meaning of a “Totalitarian Dictatorship.” (See: Exhibit
G-6 , 50 U.S.C.A. 781, 783)

The de facto legislative body of the “state”, believing themselves to be of like capacity,
and greater than the people they falsely professed to represent, also perceived it to be
within their authority to “Create A Structure of STATE GOVERNMENT.” (See:
Constitution for the State of Colorado, Article I, Section 1 & 2) The de facto new
“State”, not being delegated any authority to create Administrative Tribunals by the
Constitution for the State of Colorado, usurped authority and implemented such diverse
summary Executive Tribunals to try pretended statutory crimes and enforce executive
policy and who act under doctrines of “Expediency”, “Necessity” and “Emergency”.

“No political truth is of greater intrinsic value…The accumulation of all powers, legislative,
executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective,
may be justly pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” (See: Federalist Papers No. 47)

113
 “If the federal government should overpass the just bounds of its authority and make
tyrannical use of its powers, the people, whose creature it is, must appeal to the standard
they formed, and take such measures to redress the injury done to the Constitution as the
exigencies may suggest and prudence justify.” (See: Federalist Papers No. 33)

The three distinct and separate Departments, Legislative, Executive, and Judicial, had
been and are now hodgepodged and consolidated together under pretense of “necessity”
and “emergency”, in contravention to the “Separation of Powers Doctrine.” The basic
principles and concepts of “Justice” were then perverted to “Just Us.”

It was then possible for the bankrupt and insolvent “de facto state”, under direction,
control and apparatus of an alien/foreign, inter-agency, socialist, Dictatorial Oligarchy, to
plunder under pretended acts of legislation and under pretenses and colors of power and
authority. It was then possible to treat the free, independent, sovereign Citizen, the real
victim, as a criminal under fraudulent assessments and pretended crimes. (See: The Law,
Frederick Bastiat, (1850))

It was then possible to reverse the basic principles of Creator/Creation law and the
fundamental reasons for the formation of a society to take, seize, alienate, and expropriate
their corporeal and incorporeal property and rights to property. It was then more than
possible to effectively implement the doctrines of Karl Marx’s declaration of war i.e. the
Communist Manifesto as openly reiterated in Senate Document No. 43, 73 rd Congress, 1st
Session, “Contracts Payable In Gold, An Article Entitled “Contracts Payable In Gold” By
George Cyrus Thorpe, Showing The Legal Effects Of Agreements To Pay In Gold”, at
pg. 9:

“The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State; individual so-called “ownership” is
only by virtue of Government, i.e., law amounting to mere user; and use must be in
accordance with law and subordinate to the necessity of the State.” (See: Hearing Before A
Subcommittee Of The Committee On Foreign Relations, February 17, 1950, pg. 494, also see,
Constitution For The United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Treaty
Document 97-19, and the Communist Manifesto)

There is nothing new under heaven. It is but a repeat of historical delusions, mischiefs
and evils. As observed by Gandhi, three of the great sins of the world are, (1) Wealth
WITHOUT Work, (2) Business WITHOUT Morals, and (3) Government WITHOUT
Principles, and as evidenced herein, all three have been achieved to a very high degree of
hedonism, degeneracy and public corruption.

With that being exhibited, Movant(s) wish to quote the peoples reservation of rights
regarding military courts, whereby establishing the sentencing penalty standard, or
measure of fairness, as a matter of Military protocol, pursuant to the MILITARY LAW
REVIEW [VOL. 79], to wit:
“111. HOW DOES THE PUNITIVE DISCHARGE FIT INTO TODAY’S PENAL
PHILOSOPHY?

114
 If the premise is accepted that the military should mirror the society it was created to defend, it
logically follows that the military’s rationale for imposing a punitive discharge should rest
upon a contemporary, widely accepted, rational philosophical basis.

A. BASIC PHILOSOPHIES OF PUNISHMENT
There are six basic philosophies of punishment generally accepted by writers in the fields of
criminology and penology:  33 retribution, deterrence, social defense, prevention,
maintenance of respect for law, and rehabilitation.

1. Retribution
The oldest philosophy of punishment is that of retribution. Probably the most ancient though
well known recorded reference to it is found in “Deuteronomy 19:21” which exhorts
punishment to be eye for an eye, tooth for tooth. Among the leading philosophers that
advocated retribution as the reason for punishment were Aristotle, 35, St. Thomas
Aquinas 36 and Immanuel Kant. 37” 

The de facto state/federal/international chartered and compacted inter-agency

“Institutions”, their officers, employees, servants, agents and representatives are subject
to both Impeachment and Removal; and further, having acted in Bad Faith, in violation of
the “Clean Hands Doctrine”, and in Fraud and Contravention of the Law of the Land and
Forum, should be turned over to a Court of Law for prosecution, trial, and judgment
according to Law.

The members of the British Accredited Registry (BAR), being highly compromised, and
dependent upon turbulence and contention for their livelihood, prefer to evade duties and
obstruct such remedies and corrections.

“….From time to time immemorial it has been the recognized duty of such courts to exercise
a discretion: to refuse their aid in enforcement of unconscionable, oppressive, or iniquitous
contracts; and to turn the party claiming benefit of such contracts over to a court of law….
It is said that the plaintiff must come into court with clean hands, and that a defendant may
rest a bill for specific performance, by showing that under the circumstances the plaintiff is
not entitled to the relief he asks. Omission or mistake in the agreement, or that it is
unconscientious or unreasonable, or that there has been concealment, misrepresentation, or
any unfairness, are enumerated among the causes which will induce the court to refuse its
aid.” (See: Pope Mfg. vs. Gormully, 144 U.S. 414, at pg. 419, also see, 22 U.S.C.A. 286q)

The acts declared and complained of clearly evidence numerous iniquitous, illegal,
unlawful and fraudulent agreements entered into under pretense and colors of authority,
and which were subsequently and continually misrepresented and craftily and subtly
drawn to conceal fraudulent, unlawful, derivative and adhesion terms and parties, and to
unlawfully and fraudulently obtain a benefit, gain, and title therefrom. “He acts contrary
to law who does what the law prohibits; but he acts in fraud of the law who, when the
letter of the law being inviolate, uses the law contrary to its intentions.” (See: Digest of
the Civil Law, Book 1, Title 3, Law 29)

“Fraud vitiates the most solemn Contracts, documents and even judgments.” (See: U.S. vs.
Throckmorton, 98 U.S. 61, pg. 65)

The willful and wanton violations of the Laws of the Creator, the Laws of Nature, the
ordained and established Constitutions, and Laws made in Pursuance thereof, and the

115
fundamental principles of a valid, viable society have been and are now being committed.
The usurpations and abridgments have been and are now being aided, abetted, counseled,
commanded and procured by special, partisan, interest groups of highly questionable
character, intents and purposes, and when brought to the attention of the de facto
judicature, is like telling a snake about a snake.

It is the equivalent of telling the pimp about the whore, who upon being informed, only
demands a cut and commission from the licentious acts. The numerous arbitrary and
capricious acts, and willful violations of law and principles, left the Citizens and Posterity
in a state of permanent endangerment.

When the Laws of the State fail, everything ought to be suspect, leaving the Citizens and
Posterity to resort only to the remedies of the Laws of the Creator and Nature to secure
their Tranquility, Welfare, and Security. The determination made in Cohen vs. Virginia,
6 Wheat 264, 5 L.Ed. 257 (1821) is more than applicable, and should be executed on both
Counts as stated, to wit:

“We [Courts] have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, than
to usurp that which is not given. THE ONE OR THE OTHER WOULD BE TRESON TO
THE CONSTITUTION.” (See: U.S. vs. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, pg. 406)

It is, therefore, necessary and imperative to our Lives, Liberty, Property and Safety to
show cause and issue this, our “DECLARATION OF CAUSE AND NECESSITY TO
ABOLISH” under NOTICE OF MISPRISON of Felony and Treason, having reason to
believe that the criminal acts declared herein have been and are now being committed
(See: 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 4 and 2382, and Constitution for the United States of America,
Amendments I, IX, X, Constitution for the State of Colorado, Preamble and Article I,
Sections 1, 2 & 29.),

And further, with profound reverence for the Supreme Ruler and Creator of the Universe,
and the Laws of Nature, and under and within the Law of Nations, and the Law of the
Land and Forum, to declare and assume our status and separate station amongst the
Powers of the earth to which our forefathers claimed and established, and we are entitled
to as a matter of Birth Right, and as Testamentary Heirs and Heirs in Law. With
reservation and such respect for the opinions of mankind as is due and owing, and upon
the grounds heretofore declared, it is right and necessary to issue:

DECLARATION OF
SEPARATE AND EQUAL STATION
“WHEN IN THE COURSE OF HUMAN EVENTS…WHENEVER ANY FORM OF
GOVERNMENT BECOMES DESTRUCTIVE…WHEN A LONG TRAIN OF ABUSES
AND USURPATIONS, PURSUING INVARIABLY THE SAME OBJECT, EVINCES A
DESIGN TO REDUCE THEM UNDER ABSOLUTE DESPOTISM, IT IS THEIR RIGHT,
IT IS THEIR DUTY….” See: Declaration of Independence (1776),

Numerous actions being commenced, and our Public offices being duly noticed and
served in this matter, and having heretofore exhibited and established a willful and

116
wanton disregard for the Law and the Rights, Safety and Security of the Citizens and our
Posterity, WE THE PEOPLE give notice and Exercise our Rights and Duties to throw off
the de facto government, to extradite, arrest, prosecute and adjudge those who have
willfully committed other wrongs against the Peace, Dignity and Security of We The
People, the principal, heirs and superior Creditor.

One cannot make agreements with BABYLONIANS, Atheist and/or Satanist. Their
words, oaths and signatures are of no meaning or value; their intent and purpose is to
deceive, cheat, steal, lie, defraud and destroy.

The seditious covert conspiracy and collusion of certain Organizations, Corporations and
Associations to damage, injure, oppress, threaten, intimidate and enforce their fraudulent,
foreign, socialist, communist, “DEMOCRACY”, and to foist their delusions upon the
Citizens and children of this Land, and to corrupt our de jure Public Offices established to
accomplish the purposes set forth in the “Preamble” to the ordained and established
Constitution is cause and necessity enough.

“The supreme power cannot take from any man any part of his property without his
consent. For the preservation of property being the end of government, and that for which
men inter into society, it necessarily supposes and requires that the people should have
property, without which they must supposed to lose that [property] by entering into society,
which was the end for which they entered into it.
“….[Therefore,] whenever the legislators endeavor to take away and destroy the property of
the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they [representatives,
employees, servants] put themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon
absolved from any further obedience, and are left to the common refuge which God hath
provided for all men against force and violence. Whensoever, therefore, the legislative shall
transgress this fundamental rule of society, and either by ambition, fear, folly, or corruption,
endeavor to grasp themselves, or put into the hands of any other, an absolute power over the
lives, liberties, and estates of the people, BY THIS BREACH OF TRUST THEY FORFEIT
THE POWER THE PEOPLE HAD PUT INTO THEIR HANDS…AND IT DEVOLVES TO
THE PEOPLE, WHO HAVE THE RIGHT TO RESUME THEIR ORIGINAL LIBERTY
[natural, personal, civil, political], and …provide for their own safety and security.” (See:
Second Essay Concerning Civil Government, John Locke)

As clearly understood by the American forefathers:

“It is the greatest absurdity to suppose it in the power of one, or any number of men, at the
entering into society, to renounce their essential natural rights, or the means of preserving
those rights; when the grand end of civilized government, from the very nature of its
institution, is for the support, protection, and defense of those very rights; the principles of
which are …Life, Liberty and Property. If men, through fear, fraud or mistake, should in
terms renounce or give up any essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the
grand end of society would absolutely vacate such renunciation. The right to freedom being
the gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power of man to alienate this gift and voluntarily
become a slave.”
(See: The Life And Public Service Of Samuel Adams” Wells, Volume 1, pg. 504)

Once again finding our safety, happiness and liberties to be in imminent danger, it has
become necessary and imperative to our Rights, Duties, Privileges, Immunities, Lives,
Liberties and Property and that of our Posterity, to declare our separate and equal station,

117
and exercise our Right and Duty to throw off and abolish the form and operation of the de
facto, fraudulent, seditious “state.” (See: Constitution For The State of Colorado, Article
I, Section 2, Declaration of Independence (1776), Constitution For The United States Of
America, Amendments IX and X.

“Preamble:
We, the people of Colorado, with profound reverence for the Supreme Ruler of the Universe,
in order to form a more independent and perfect government; establish justice; insure
tranquility; provide for the common defense; promote the general welfare and secure the
blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this constitution
for the "State of Colorado".” [

And…

“BILL OF RIGHTS

ART. II: In order to assert our rights, acknowledge our duties, and proclaim the principles
upon which our government is founded, we declare: 

Section 1. Vestment of political power. All political power is vested in and derived from the
people; all government, of right, originates from the people, is founded upon their will only,
and is instituted solely for the good of the whole.

Section 2. People may alter or abolish form of government � proviso . The people of this state
have the sole and exclusive right of governing themselves, as a free, sovereign and
independent state; and to alter and abolish their constitution and form of government
whenever they may deem it necessary to their safety and happiness, provided, such change
be not repugnant to the constitution of the United States. 

Section 3.  Inalienable rights.  All persons have certain natural, essential and inalienable
rights, among which may be reckoned the right of enjoying and defending their lives and
liberties; of acquiring, possessing and protecting property; and of seeking and obtaining
their safety and happiness.

- IT IS HEREBY DEEMED NECESSARY -

JURE CORONEA – TESTE MEIPSO

WHEREFORE, WE THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, EX

REL; PRIVATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL & REDEEMER, James D. Hardin, et al.,
respectfully Petition’s Common Council to assemble and for setting of Privy Council to
receive “Presentment(s)” and take evidence and testimony and issue a True Bill, pursuant
to the Constitution for the United States of America (1787) [See:
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-CONAN-1992/pdf/GPO-CONAN-1992-6.pdf], Amendment V. [See:
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-CONAN-1992/pdf/GPO-CONAN-1992-7.pdf] Numerous High Crimes,
Misdemeanors and gross Malfeasance have been committed under the Constitution for
the United States of America, and Laws made in Pursuance thereof, and under the
Constitution for the State of Colorado, and the Laws made in pursuance thereof, and
against the Peace and Dignity of US, We, The People.

118
It is against the Laws of the Creator, and the Law of the Land and forum to aid, abet,
counsel, command or procure the commission of criminal acts or contract with a
belligerent. (See: Hall vs. Coppell, 74 U.S. (7 Wall) 244, Ward vs. Smith, 74 U.S. (7
Wall) 210)

The members of the de facto judicature having heretofore claimed for themselves
“ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY” for acts committed under false and fraudulent pretenses
and colors of law and authority [Stump vs. Sparkman, 435 US 349, 55 L. Ed. 2d 331, 98
S. Ct. 1099] and having aided, abetted, counseled, commanded and procured the
furtherance, compounding and concealment of the unlawful acts declared and evidenced
herein, and having obstructed “Presentments” to the Grand Jury, or after Presentment
was served upon the foreman thereof, appeared before the same to influence them not to
investigate the cause of the Citizens, and having criminally breached the duties imposed
upon OUR offices of Honor, Trust and Profit, usurped Powers and Authority not
delegated or specifically prohibited by law, have claimed a Title of Nobility, and have
openly declared the Principle, Citizen to be the ENEMY, of whom is without remedy.
ONLY A SLAVE HAS NO REMEDY!

We The People were not born slaves, nor are we cannon fodder of, nor on the behalf of
Traitorous, Treacherous, Seditious, Treasonous Oath Breakers, and their illicit, profligate
acts and associations.

Submissions herein are with sincere consideration of presentment and is

made this 28th Day of August, 2023.

Respectfully Submitted,

_________________________
By: /s/ James D. Hardin, Ex Rel.,
(The People of The State of Colorado)
I have been murdered on multiple occasions; and yet I
RISE:
https://youtu.be/lFIIMEe2Ht0

Other Inflation-related Sites

 Consumer Price Index Home Page at the Bureau of Labor Statistics

 Consumer Price Index Conversion Factors
 Statistical Abstract of the United States, from the Census Bureau
 Inflation Calculator in Java
 Current Value of Old Money

119
 Canadian Inflation Calculator

____________________________________

BACKGROUND
with FACTS & LAW
____________________________________

120
THE TRUMPET / SHOFAR HATH SOUNDED
& ARE SOUNDING THE ALARMS OF WAR
*THE ALARMS HAVE BEEN HEARD*

121
We, The People most certainly didn’t start this war and yet nevertheless We, The People find
ourselves at war rather we want it or not; and We, The People have long been under attack, we have
been labeled as Terrorist, foreign mercenaries have been sent into the body of the several States to
sabotage US, to wage Economic warfare upon US, to wage PSYOPS warfare upon US, to gas US with
asphyxiating and/or poisonous gasses, to break and enter our homes, to commit Prohibited No Trial
Summary Judgment Executions of our people in their own homes and even in their own bed’s by
Lethal Injections using 3-chemical cocktail’s, including but not limited to phenol, ergotamine, ET
AL.;

Now then, what about these people who are victims of vicious unimaginable attacks upon themselves,
attacks upon their families, attacks and sabotage upon their private property and the like, but the
rub comes in due to the fact that the attacks upon them are perpetrated by their own Government
who wishes to silence their voices. Does anybody even hear them; and what of the Vox populi?

and…

Description
Vox populi is a Latin phrase that literally means “voice of the people”. It is used in English in the meaning
"the opinion of the majority of the people". In journalism, vox pop or man on the street refers to short
interviews with members of the public. Wikipedia

Vox Populi
https://youtu.be/oGeXD2Sq_A8

122
American Peace Flag

On The Title 4 U.S.C. 1, 

American Flag of Peace of the united States of America

THE FLAG, AS WITH ALL THINGS IN LAW, IS HIGHLY

DEFINED

On June 14, 1776, Congress made the following resolution:

“The flag of the United States shall be thirteen stripes, alternate red and white, with a union
of thirteen stars of white on a blue field…”

Because Congress made no rule for the arrangement of the stars, they were displayed in
different ways, most usually in a circle. As new states joined the Union, they demanded
representation in the stars and stripes of the flag. In 1795 Congress voted to increase to
15 the number of stars and stripes. Legislation enacted in 1818 reestablished the number
of stripes at 13, and instituted the policy, to wit:

“That on the admission of every new state into the Union, one star be added to the Union of
the flag...”.

An executive order issued by President William Howard Taft on October 29, 1912, fixed
the overall width and length of the U.S. flag, known technically as the hoist and fly,
respectively, in a ratio of 1: 1.9. The thirteen stripes were fixed at equal width.

The hoist of the blue field containing the stars was fixed at seven-thirteenths of the
overall hoist, that is, as extending from the top of the flag to the bottom of the seventh
stripe. The fly of the blue field was fixed at a tiny fraction over three-fourths the overall
hoist. The diameter of each star was established as a minute fraction under one-sixteenth
of the overall hoist.

Currently, the Flag of the united States of America is defined at title 4 U.S.C. 1, 2 and
Presidential Executive Order 10834, found in the Federal Register at Vol. 24. No. 166, P.
6365-6367. The American Flag of Peace of the united States of America is described as
red, white and blue, with thirteen alternating red and white horizontal stripes, and a blue
field (union) with 50 stars, one to represent each of the several States.

123
The Flag is proportional, (1 X 1.9). This proportion is easily determined by measuring
the length (fly) and dividing by the measurement of the width (hoist). The length divided
by the width should be very nearly 1.9. If the flag is not to the correct 1 X 1.9
proportion, it is not a title 4 U.S.C. 1,2 American Flag of Peace of the united States of
America.

THERE ARE ABSOLUTELY NO PROVISIONS IN THE LAW FOR ADDING A

FOURTH COLOR (YELLOW FRINGE) TO THE TITLE 4 U.S.C. 1, 2 FLAG.

Title 4 U.S.C. 3 provides that anything put on the Title 4 U.S.C. 1,2 Flag (gold fringe)
MUTILATES the Flag, and carries a one-year prison term. This is confirmed by the
authority of title 36 U.S.C. 176 (G). The gold fringe is the fourth color and represents
“color of law”, and, when placed on the title 4 U.S.C. 1,2 Flag, mutilates the Flag and
suspends the organic Constitution for the United States of America, and establishes
“color of law”. (Refer to Title 18 U.S.C. 242. Also See Black’s Law Dictionary).

As provided by Title 36 U.S.C. 173, and Army Regulation 840-10, chapter 2-1(b), the
Flag of the united States of America is defined and described in title 4 U.S.C. 1,2.
Civilians must use the title 4 U.S.C. 1,2 Flag (See Title 36 U.S.C. 173 and Army
Regulation 840-10, chapter 2-7) and when military flags are displayed by Army
Regulation 840-10, chapter 2 and title 36 U.S.C. 175.

THE ONLY AUTHORITY FOR A FRINGE ON THE FLAG IS IN THE ARMY

REGULATIONS FOR THE NATIONAL (MILITARY) FLAGS ONLY.

The U.S. Attorney General has stated:

“The placing of a gold fringe on the National flag, the dimensions of the flag, and the
arrangement of the stars in the union are matters of detail not controlled by statute, but are
within the discretion of the President as Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy. . .
ancient custom sanctions the use of fringe on regimental colors and standards, but there
seems to be no good reason or precedent for its use on other flags. . . the use of such a fringe
is prescribed in current Army Regulations, No. 260-10.” (See 34 Ops. Atty. Gen. 483 & 485).

The only statute or regulation, in the United States, prescribing a yellow fringed United
States flag is Army Regulation No. 260-10, making it a military flag.

By army regulation 260-10, the gold fringe may be used only on regimental “colors”, the
President’s flag, for military courts martial, and the flags used at military recruiting
centers.

“A military flag emblem of a nation, usually made of cloth and flown from a staff; FROM A
MILITARY STANDPOINT flags are of two general classes… those flown from stationary
masts over army posts, and those carried by troops in formation. The former are referred to
by the general name of flags. The latter are called colors when carried by dismounted
troops. COLORS AND STANDARDS are more nearly square than flags, and are made of
silk, with a knotted FRINGE OF YELLOW ON THREE SIDES... USE OF A FLAG -- THE
MOST GENERAL AND APPROPRIATE USE OF THE FLAG IS AS A NATIONAL
SYMBOL OF AUTHORITY AND POWER” (National Encyclopedia, Vol. 4)

124
The adornments on the top of the flag pole are for military use only. The gold eagle is for
the use of the President of the United States only, and only in time of war. (Or when he is
standing as Commander-in-Chief of the military, having declared Martial Law, and
suspended the Constitution). The gold spear ball is for military recruiting centers only.
The gold acorn is for military parades only. (Army Regulation 840-10, chapter 8).

In Webster’s Dictionary, the word Colors is defined as:

“A flag, ensign, or standard borne in an army or fleet.” (Webster’s, 1971).

Black’s Law Dictionary defines Color as:

“Color An appearance, semblance, or simulacrum, as distinguished from that which is real.

A prima facie or apparent right. Hence, a deceptive appearance; a plausible, assumed
exterior, concealing a lack of reality; a disguise or pretext. (Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Ed.)

U.S. Case Law defines Color of law as follows:

“Color of law The appearance or semblance, without the substance, of legal right. Misuse of
power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because wrongdoer is clothed
with authority of state, is action taken under “color of state law”. Colorable That which is
in appearance only, and not in reality, what it purports to be, hence counterfeit, feigned,
having the appearance of truth.” (Windel v. Flinn, 251 P 2d 136, 146).

This, of course is done, for purposes of Fraud and of Colorable alteration, to wit: One
which makes no real or substantial change, but is introduced only as a subterfuge or
means of evading the patent or copyright law.

Back in Black’s we also find Colorable Imitation, to wit:

“Colorable imitation In the law of trademarks, this phrase denotes such a close or ingenious
imitation as to be calculated to deceive ordinary persons. (Blacks Law 6th).

The Title 4 U.S.C. 1, 2 American Flag of the united States of America takes precedence
over all other flags, as it is the superior flag, and establishes the jurisdiction of the united
States of America, and the laws made in pursuance thereof.

THE LAW OF THE FLAG

The Law of the Flag, an International Law, which is recognized by every nation of the
planet, is defined as:

“...a rule to the effect that a vessel is a part of the territory of the nation whose flag she flies.
The term is used to designate the right under which a ship owner, who sends his vessel into a
foreign port, gives notice by his flag to all who enter into contracts with the ship master that
he intends the Law of that Flag to regulate those contracts, and that they must either submit
to its operation or not contract with him or his agent at all.” (Ref. Ruhstrat v. People, 57
N.E. 41)

125
By the doctrine of “four cornering: the flag establishes the law of the country that it
represents. For example, the embassies of foreign countries, in Washington, D.C., are
“four cornered” by walls or fencing, creating an “enclave.” Within the boundaries of the
“enclave” of the foreign embassy, the flag of that foreign country establishes the
jurisdiction and law of that foreign country, which will be enforced by the Law of the
Flag and international treaty. If you enter an embassy, you will be subject to the laws of
that country, just as if you board a ship flying a foreign flag, you will be subject to the
laws of that flag, enforceable by the “master of the ship,” (Captain), by the law of the
flag.

Under Article IV, section 3, of the organic Constitution for the United States of America
(1787), no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State.
So -- why have the Germans been allowed to erect a German enclave at Holloman Air
Force Base in New Mexico, under the Law of the Flag? Why have the judges of the State
and Federal Courts been allowed to erect foreign enclaves within our courthouses under
the foreign flag of the yellow fringe on the soil of our Republic?

The flags displayed in State courts and courts of the United States have gold or yellow
fringes. It is your warning that you are entering a foreign enclave and will be subject to
the jurisdiction of that flag. The flag of the gold or yellow fringe has no constitution, no
laws, and no rules of court, and is not recognized by any Nation on the earth, and is
foreign to this Republic and the united States of America.

When you enter a courtroom displaying a gold or yellow fringed flag, you have just
entered into a foreign country, and you had better have your passport with you, you may
not be coming back. The judge under a gold or yellow fringe flag become the “captain”
or “master” and has absolute power to make the rules as he goes.

The gold or yellow fringe flag is your warning that you are leaving your constitutionally
secured rights at the door, to wit:

“It is an elementary rule of pleading, that a plea to the jurisdiction is a tacit (silent)
admission that the court has a right to judge in the case and is a waiver to all exception to
the jurisdiction.” (Girty v. Logan, 6 Bush KY. 8)

You can watch over the ramparts by the dawn’s early light, with bombs bursting in the
air, until you go blind, but you will not see a title 4 U.S.C. 1, 2 Flag with its bright stars
and broad stripes. When the flags are gone, the Country is gone!

You may see something that looks like an American Flag, (a colorable flag, a colorable
alteration or imitation) but it is a shortened National Flag, for military use only. Take
your tape measure and calculator to determine what kind of a flag it is.

Five will get you ten that its proportion is 1 X 1.66 or 1 X 1.5. It looks like a duck, walks
like a duck, quacks like a duck, but it isn’t a duck. It is something far more insidious and
hedonistic! Far more Treacherous and Far more Seditious!

126
Why do private businesses display National Flags with military adornments on the
flagpole? Why do banks display gold or yellow fringed flags, with gold adornments, in
their lobbies? Is McDonald’s competing with the Army recruiters? Why do churches
display military flags? Tell me the truth ye “Church of Mormon(s)”! Does your Church
have a pastor, or chaplain? Why have military “colors” been placed in our public
schools? Why are our children being taught under martial law, in a foreign or military
“enclave” with no constitutionally secured rights, under the Law of the Flag? A military
or foreign flag, displayed without the presence of a title 4 U.S.C. 1, 2 Flag suspends the
Constitution, by the International law of the flag.

The Attorney General issued an Opinion on the matter, to wit:

“Flag - Martial law “The placing of a fringe on the national flag, the dimensions of the flag
and the arrangement of the stars in the union are matters of detail not controlled by statute,
but are within the discretion of the President as Commander In Chief of the Army and
Navy.” 34 Ops. Atty. Gen. 483.

and...

“The use of such a fringe is prescribed in current Army Regulation, No. 260-10.” 34 Ops.
Atty. Gen. 483, 485.

and...

“Ancient customs sanctions the use of the fringe on regimental colors and standards, but
there seems to be no good reason or precedent for its use on other flags.” The Adjutant
General of the Army, Mar. 28, 1924, (1925) 34 Ops. Atty. Gen. 483, 485.

Display of Military Flag

Flag - Martial Law “2-3. Sizes and Occasions for Display.  

b. National flags listed below are for indoor display and for use in ceremonies and parades.
For these purposes the United States flag will be rayon banner cloth, trimmed on three sides
with golden yellow fringe, 2 1/2 inches wide. It will be the same size as the flags displayed or
carried with it.  
c. Authorization for indoor display 
4. Each military courtroom. [The municipal Courts of the State Republic???] “1-6.
Restrictions. The following limitations and prohibitions are applicable to flags, guidons,
streamers, and components. 
e. Unauthorized use of official flags, guidons, and streamers. Display or use of flags,
guidons, and streamers or replicas thereof, including those presently or formerly carried by
U.S. Army units, by other than the office, individual, or organization for which authorized,
is prohibited except as indicated in (3) below, to wit:  

“(3) Recognized United States Army division associations...” United States Army
Regulation AR 840-10, October 1, 1979.

The month the present case is set for seems most appropriate, as a “SIGN” or “The
Times” for it was under the EIGHTH month also that Presidential Executive Order 10834
was issued, to wit:

127
 “Flag - Martial Law Pursuant to 4 U.S.C. chapter 1, §§ 1, 2, & 3; Executive Order 10834,
August 21, 1959, 24 F.R. 6865, a military flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the
United States, except that it has a YELLOW FRINGE border on three sides. The President
of the United States designates this deviation from the regular flag, by executive order, and
in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief.

and...

“Flag - “The flag of the United States shall be thirteen horizontal stripes, alternating red and
white; and the union of the flag shall be forty-eight stars, white in a blue field.” 61 Stat. 642,
July 30, 1947, ch. 389. 4 U.S.C.A. 1. (This describes the civil flag of the United States as it is
to be flown in the District of Columbia, its enclaves and overseas on ships and embassies.)

Flag of the United States: Army Regulation 840-10 update is as follows:

2-1. Authorization  
(a) The flag of the United States is the symbol of our nation. The union white
stars on a field of blue, is the honor point of the flag. The union of the flag,
and the flag itself when in company with other flags, is always given the
honor position: for example, the marching right, the flag’s own right, or an
observer’s left facing the flag.

BUT MOST OF ALL, WHY DO CIVILIAN COURTS DISPLAY MILITARY OR

FOREIGN FLAGS?

WHY DO CIVILIAN JUDGES CONDUCT COURTS MARTIAL FOR CIVILIANS?

Under martial law, you are presumed guilty until proven innocent, which is why the Civil
Courts are closed during times of Marshal Law.

WHY ARE THERE NO MANUFACTURERS THAT PRODUCE CORRECT TITLE 4

U.S.C. 1 FLAGS? (TRY TO BUY ONE OF LAWFUL SIZE 3’ X 5’)

AMERICA HAS BEEN CONQUERED, AND BY TACIT ADMISSION and

AGREEMENT, THE PEOPLE HAVE SURRENDERED!!!

RESPONDENT, James Hardin is also under a solemn Oath and Affirmation as The
People’s Attorneys General! While Hardin’s Oath to PROTECT & DEFEND the People
and the Constitution of the united States of America and with all due respect, Hardin has
not in the past, the present, nor does Hardin have any plans whatsoever, nor at anytime in
the future shall Hardin surrender his People, his Nation, nor his FREE FLAG OF
PEACE; and hereby issue Notice and further states and declares, should he fall at
anytime, when as now, He is acting in the capacity of “Flag Bearer”, who among you
shall continue as Flag Bearer?

I tell you the truth, God shall raise His witness, rather the same day (as He has done
before), or three days later (as He has done before), and again God Almighty shall raise
His chosen witness from the dead and say to His faithful servant, James Hardin, my

128
Chosen, I Command you… COME FORTH… STAND UPON THY FEET, FOR YOUR
WORK IS NOT YET COMPLETED! Therefore, by the Divine Order of GOD
ALMIGHTY, saying to this Chosen one: “you are My Chosen Witness and I Command
you this Day to “Stand upon thy feet My good and faithful Servant… I Command you to
RISE!

Therefore, God, The Almighty again commands His servant to continue with bearing his
standard and banner. The said banner being the:

FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES. By the act entitled "An act to establish the flag of the
United States," (Rev.St. §§ 1791, 1792), it was provided "that, from and after the fourth day
of July next, the flag of the United States be thirteen horizontal stripes, alternate red and
white; that the union be twenty stars, white in a blue field; that, on the admission of every
new state into the Union, one star be added to the union of the flag; and that such addition
shall take effect on the fourth day of July then next succeeding such admission." See Act
July 30, 1947, c. 389, §§ 1, 2, 61 Stat.. 641; 4 U.S.C.A. §§ 1, 2.

and...

“BEARER. One who bears, carries, or holds a thing. Defined by the Negotiable Instruments
Act as the person in possession of a bill or note which is payable to bearer. Miller v. People's
Say. Bank, 193 Mo.App. 498, 186 S.W. 547, 550. When a check, note, draft, etc., is payable
to "bearer," it imports that the contents thereof shall be payable to any person who may
present the instrument for payment.” Thompson v. Perrine, 106 U.S. 589, 1 S.Ct. 564, 568,
27 L. Ed. 298 and (BLACK’S LAW DICT. 4TH ED.).

Whom among you are able to say, “FOR GOD AND FOR COUNTRY, I AM? FOR
THIS PURPOSE, WAS I BORN; AND I AM COME BEARING WITNESS TO
THE TRUTH”? Whom among man can say today while Looking God in the eyes and
say, they have signed up and volunteered to bear the burdens, the cost, the losses of fame,
of name and of fortunes, the guarantee they would suffer high levels of disparagement,
slander, defamation, libel, sabotage, strict scrutiny, invasion of privacy, and whose life
will suffer unimaginable levels of TRAP and TRACE INVASIONS.

Again I ask, whom among man would not be soon stifled by the additional guarantee of
not only the guarantee of losing everything one has ever worked for; and more, the
spilling of their own blood, the bruising down to the bones; mental and physical trauma;
and including, but not limited to the loss of life, on multiple occasions? While seemingly
impossible, God has found One, even One chosen by God and for God.

THE OBLIGATIONS COME FROM THE GOD WHOSE NAME WAS GIVEN TO
BOTH MOSES AND TO THE EGYPTIAN’S, SAYING TO MOSES: “GO AND TELL
THEM THE GOD WHOSE NAME IS ‘I AM THAT I AM’ HATH SENT YOU”!
MOSES WAS SENT BY GOD, SAYING: LET MY PEOPLE GO! MOSES WAS
CHOSEN BY GOD, TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF GOD’S CHOSEN PEOPLE...

MOSES WAS GOD’S MAN, CHOSEN AS GOD’S SPEAKER FOR GOD’S PEOPLE,
MOSES WAS A GIFT OF GOD, GIVEN TO GOD’S CHOSEN BY HIS SERVANT

129
MOSES, IN DAYS AND TIMES LONG AGO PASSED. NOW, IN THESE LAST
DAYS, COMMANDING US, TO GO FORTH AND MAKE STRAIGHT THE WAY
OF THE LORD AND TESTIFYING TO WHAT IS RITE, JUST AND TRUE”! The
foundation of God’s throne, is: “RIGHTEOUSNESS” and “JUSTICE”.
WHEREFORE, BOTH MUST BE RESTORED!

And...

God has promised Hardin with regards to those who oppose him, saying:

“They may act, but not by me!” (Isaiah)

When two nations go to war, the object of the game is to capture the other guy’s flag.
When you go onto foreign soil, take the other guy’s flag down and put yours up, you
have captured the other guy’s territory and put it under the law (Constitution) of your
flag.

Sun Tzu, the ancient Chinese philosopher and general, said that when the Art of War is
brought to its highest pinnacle, the enemy will be conquered without the opposing armies
ever having met in the field. By skillfully using the art of deception, and skillful use of
agents to infiltrate the enemy’s government, the enemy may be conquered without the
enemy ever knowing that it had been conquered.

IT IS IN JUST SUCH A MANNER THAT WE HERE IN THE UNITED STATES

HAVE ALSO BEEN CONQUERED! WHERE IS THE VFW? WHERE ARE THE
VETERANS THAT PAID SO HIGH A PRICE FOR THE TITLE 4 U.S.C. 1,2
AMERICAN FLAG AND THE LIBERTY AND COUNTRY THAT IT REPRESENTS?
WILL THESE MEN WHO SACRIFICED SO MUCH CONTINUE TO CONSENT
TO THE FALL OF OUR NATION BY THEIR CONTINUED SILENCE?

WILL THEY CONTINUE TO BOTH, DECLARE THEIR OWN COUNTRYMEN

TO BE TERRORIST WHOM ATTEMPT TO BRING SUCH FACTS TO THE
ATTENTION OF THOSE IN POSITIONS OF AUTHORITY, OR ELSE, TO
CONFRONT THOSE WHOM HAVE, OR ATTEMPTED TO SIMPLY GAS US IN
OUR OWN HOMES. THEREAFTER, THE SAME WAR CRIMINALS BREAK
AND ENTER OUR HOMES; AND WHILE STILL ASLEEP FROM THEIR
ASPHYXIATING AND POISONOUS GASSES… THEY THEN CARRY OUT AN
UNLAWFUL, UNAUTHORIZED AND PROHIBITED ACT, GRAVE BREACHES
& WAR CRIMES OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT EXECUTIONS BY LEATHAL
INJECTION OF A THREE (3) CHIMICAL COCKTAIL.

A COCKTAIL, MIND YOU, WHICH THERE EXIST NO MEDICINAL

BENNIFIT FOR ITS USE. COULD THE ONLY EXCEPTION OTHER THAN
TO CAUSE GREAT BODILY HARM AND/OR IMMINENT DEATH, MURDER,
(KILL CODE 187)? THE PRIMARY REASON FOR THAT QUESTION, IS TO
FIGURE OUT RATHER THOSE IN POSITIONS OF AUTHORITY HAVE
CAPITULATED BY TACIT AGREEMENT, OR OTHERWISE?

130
 “Capitulation. The act or agreement of surrendering upon negotiated or simulated terms.”
(Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Ed.)

and…

“Tacit Existing, inferred, or understood without being openly expressed or stated, implied
by silence or silent acquiescence, as a tacit agreement or tacit understanding. Done or made
in silence, implied or indicated, but not actually expressed. Manifested by the refraining
from contradiction or objection, inferred from the situation and circumstance, in the
absence of express matter.” (Black’ Law Dictionary, 6th Ed.)

and…

“Tacit admissions An acknowledgment or concession of a fact inferred from either silence or

from the substance of what one has said.”

Maxims of Law “Tacita quaedam habentur pro expressis” THINGS UNEXPRESSED

ARE SOMETIMES CONSIDERED AS EXPRESSED.  
 

CONCLUSION

Our elected officials, judges, county commissioners, city councils, school boards and
school administrators, city and librarians, police, State Legislators, Governor, Mayor, the
U.S. Congress, and even the President have all committed acts of CONSTRUCTIVE
TREASON, defined as:

“...an attempt to establish treason by circumstantiality, and not by the simple genuine letter
of the law, and therefore is highly dangerous to public freedom.” C.J.S., vol. 87, p. 910)

The High Crimes and Misdemeanor’s; and the coercion, deception, theft and FRAUD
complained of, either knowingly or unknowingly, against the People of the united States
of America by surrendering the American Flag of Peace of the united States of America
to the foreign state/power of the yellow fringe flag and erecting “foreign enclaves” on the
soil of the several States in BREACH of Article IV, section 3. When all of the title 4
U.S.C. 1, 2 American Flags are gone, our country, the united States of America, also
known as the several States united; and our precious constitutions are gone.

If the flag is not important, why then, did an entire battalion of Marines, in early 1942,
die to the last man on Wake Island defending the flag against the Japanese? These
Marines did not surrender their flag, but rather, they died in a manner so as to prop up
their flag!

In early 1942, in the Philippines, a young officer named Lt. Ramsey, under the command
of Gen. Wainwright, led the last mounted cavalry charge in the history of the U.S. Army.
Lt. Ramsey and his men fought so viciously and with such determination that, against
overwhelming odds, the Japanese were routed, buying precious time to enable the
American forces to retreat to the peninsula of Bataan.

131
When the American forces were finally forced by starvation to surrender to the Japanese,
Lt. Ramsey refused to surrender and slipped through the Japanese lines with a handful of
his men and continued to make war against the Japanese with the Philippine Army. By
hiding in the mountains and jungle, Lt. Ramsey, though poorly equipped, was able to
train a guerrilla army and wreak havoc on the Japanese until Gen. McArthur returned.

Therefore, let this, Respondent’s NOTICE issue/go forth, even unto all mankind
everywhere, whom on this day resides anywhere upon the face of this planet, called
Earth! Respondent’s NOTICE to all mankind that Lt. Ramsey did not surrender in his
day, and neither shall Respondent, James Hardin surrender our flag(s) on this day!

DEFINITION

Constructive Treason  
Officers that swear an oath and affirmation for supporting and defending the organic
Constitution for the United States of America, and by surrendering the oath and
affirmation to the foreign state/power of the foreign yellow or gold fringe flag, causing
the party before the court a deprivation of rights, with ill will and intent by the judge, by
overt acts to surrender the organic Constitution for the United States of America (1787)
into the hands of a foreign power/state, by definition, is guilty of constructive treason.

Treason imputed to a person by law from his conduct or course of action, though his
deeds taken severally do not amount to actual treason.

See Flag Code, Etiquette and Laws

How does your flag measure up?

Title 4 of the United States Code describes the specifications of the OFFICIAL United
States Flag and yet up until now, there have been no OFFICIAL flags made available to
the citizens of our country. Yet the Title 4 U.S.C 1,2 FREE FLAG OF PEACE, DOES
NOT EXIST, NOR CAN THE SAME BE FOUND, NO, NOT EVEN IN ONE SINGLE
STATE OR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDING WITHIN ANY STATE OF THE
UNION OF STATES!

 Now, If the U.S. Code defines the specific design of the official U.S. Flag, then what
statement are we making when we fly a flag that does not represent our country...the
United States of America, nor of any State thereof??? 

WHEREFORE, for the reasons and arguments shown, made and stated above herein, it is
hereby demanded that the lawful Title 4, Sec. 1, National Flag be returned to its rightful
and proper places in all of our State and Federal Judicial Courts, Municipal Courts, State
and Federal Government Buildings and wherever else the Title 4 U.S.C. 1,2 Free Flag of
Peace shall be flying; and shall fly higher than any other flag displayed. In all such cases
or events, it is only legal to fly the Title 4, Sec. 1,2 American Free Flag of Peace and
shall be raised, or elevated higher, or above any and all other flags upon display.

132
 Dated this 28TH Day of August, 2023

Respectfully Submitted,

By: ________________________
/s/ James Hardin

SIA - Unstoppable Today: https://youtu.be/ydwBQhpFR1Q

White Flag: https://youtu.be/ZWftJNCWZsQ?si=rYNE28AFY6KDmELG

133
American Peace Flag

James D. Hardin
12061 Merrill Hts..
Peytan, Colorado U.S.A.
[NEW STATES POSTAL ZONE: 80831]

July 4, 2023

To: Prosecuting Attorney

Name of Pros. Atty.
Address
City, State [P.Z.]
Ph. (555) 555-5555
Fx. (555) 555-5555
And...
Deputy ____________________ County Attorney
Name Here
Address
State Postal Zone
Ph. (555) 555-5555
Fx. (555) 555-5555

RESPONSE REQUIRED

IN RE: Incorporated Case #: _______________________________

AFFIDAVIT

I, James Hardin, am more than twenty-one (21) years of age and fully competent to
testify to the facts stated herein to which I have direct and personal knowledge. The facts
testified to are the truth, whole truth, and nothing but the truth, SO HELP ME GOD.

and…

134
 NOTICE

Responsibility disclaimer under U.C.C. 3-501: Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure (hereafter known as F.R.C.P.) Rule 38(a). The Case Titled above is under Title
4 U.S.C. 1 AMERICAN FLAG OF PEACE, of the united States of America, under
Presidential Execution Order 10834. No titles of NOBILITY under any Foreign Flag
jurisdiction and in Breach of Article (1), Section (9), of the Constitution for the united
States of America, will be allowed in the jurisdiction of this Case.

Breach of this contract will cause sanctions under F.R.C.P- Rule 16(f). When the
constitution of the united States of America is surrendered to a foreign jurisdiction, then
charges of perjury of oath (Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1621), Constructive Treason, and
contempt for the Constitution for the united States of America, and False Swearing will
be brought against the Officers of the Court responsible.

CITIZEN IN PARTY IS STATING: Without due process of the law, pursuant to Title 42
U.S.C. 1986 for KNOWLEDGE of the LAW, required by Law, for not correcting and
stopping a wrong as against the CITIZEN IN PARTY by the PROSECUTING
ATTORNEY titled above, under FRAUD F.R.C.P Rule 9(b).

CITIZEN IN PARTY is accusing the prosecuting attorney,

_________________________ whose British Accredited Registry (B.A.R.) No. is:
_______________ and Deputy ______________________ County Attorney,
____________________________ whose British Accredited Registry (B.A.R.) No. is:
______________ of FRAUD AND CONDITION OF MIND under F.R.C.P. Rule 9(b)
and FAILURE TO JOIN F.R.C.P. Rule 12(b) (7), FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM,
F.R.C.P. Rule 12(b) (6), PROCESS OF SERVICE F.R.C.P. 12(b) (5), SERVICE OF
PROCESS F.R.C.P. 12(b) (4), WRONG VENUE, F.R.C.P. 12(b) (3), LACK OF
JURISDICTION OVER THE PARTY BEFORE THE COURT (No disclaimer of
responsibility of the Court upon the party U.C.C. 3-501) F.R.C.P. 12(b) (2), NO
SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OVER THE SUBJECT MATTER BEFORE THE
COURT F.R.C.P. 12(b) (1) and SANCTIONS FOR FAILURE TO JOIN F.R.C.P. 16(f)

135
with the American Flag of Peace of the united States of America, Title 4 U.S.C. 1, as
sworn to in the prosecuting Attorney's OATH AND AFFIRMATION of the
Constitution of the united States of America.

Prosecuting Attorney(s), ___________________________ and

________________________________ caused injury to the CITIZEN IN PARTY
_____________________________________ under CONSPIRACY, Title 42 U.S.C.
1985 (1) and causing a DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS under COLOR OF LAW, Title
18 U.S.C. 242, and PERJURY OF OATH pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. 1621, and
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, Title 18 U.S.C. 1512.

and...

CAPIAS WARRANTS when issued without the aid of a Neutral Magistrate with a Show
Cause hearing have been declared illegal and unlawful in Crane vs. STATE OF TEXAS-
19S5-Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals:

(1) Person issuing WARRANT improperly loses Corporate Limited Liability.

(2) County in which the WARRANT was improperly issued, loses Corporate
Limited Liability.

(a) Prosecuting Attorney(s) ________________________ and

___________________________ has no legislative enactment clause for the
nature of this charge making it into law.
(b) Prosecuting Attorney(s) ________________________ and
___________________________ has no legislative enactment clause for the
creation of the Office of Lawyer, Counselor, Attorney, Esquire.
(c) Prosecuting Attorney(s) ________________________ and
___________________________ has a sworn oath of Office to uphold the
Constitution of the united States of America and my rights in said Constitution of
the united States of America.
(d) Prosecuting Attorney(s) ________________________ and
___________________________ does NOT have a signed Contract containing
his/her signature and my signature in which an agreement was reached to give my
Constitutional Rights away to him for him/her to violate his/her OATH OF
OFFICE.
(e) Prosecuting Attorney does have a true Name, Address, and Phone number.

136
(f) Prosecuting Attorney(s) ________________________ and
___________________________ does have a BOND NUMBER and a
BONDING COMPANY that can be taken for failure to rebut all of the above with
Controverting Evidence.

Failure by the above Prosecuting Attorney(s) ________________________ and

___________________________, to rebut any or all of the above AFFIDAVIT of
TRUTH with Controverting Evidence of Truth in ten (10) Days is acquiescence to its
truth and validity and can be used as evidence in further action taken.

Dated this 28TH Day of August, 2023

FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT.

Respectfully Submitted

By: ___________________________
James Hardin

Witness One

____________________________
Name
Address
City, Colorado U.S.A.
[NEW STATES POSTAL ZONE __________]
Ph.

Witness Two

___________________________
Name
Address
City, Colorado U.S.A.
[NEW STATES POSTAL ZONE __________]
Ph.

137
 AFFIDAVIT USE
AND INSTRUCTIONS

1. This Document is very important in its use as it refuses the Attorneys efforts to get you to try to
enter in as a third party when he has sued you in one of the courts - When you are sued, issued a ticket, or
addressed by an Attorney of a Government Agency or a Corporation, simply send this document to the
Attorney, Lawyer, Counselor1 Esquire that has addressed you.

2- NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, address a response to the Court or Judge for the Attorney who has a
CONTRACT with the Court and Judge to make you do whatever you are being accused of. Simply type or
write this AFFIDAVIT to the Lawyer, Attorney, Counselor, Esquire that is trying to get you to enter into
this Cause or Case as a Third Party to a Contract that already exists between the Court and the Attorney.
Put the Cause or Case Number on the Affidavit, NEVER the Court or Judge, enter a copy into the Court
records but the original goes to the Attorney, Prosecuting Attorney, Lawyer, Counselor, Esquire and
him/her alone-

3. NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, discuss Subject Matter with anyone after you file this into the records
and it is sent to the Attorney. It anyone calls; Attorney, Counselor, Lawyer, Esquire, Judge, Bailiff, simply
state, I cannot discuss anything with you, "I DON'T HAVE A CONTRACT WITH YOU". Then hang up.
You may at this time get a Summons Order from the Judge of the Court. Simply "REFUSE FOR FRAUD"
(See next paragraph (4)) and return it to the Judge and the Lawyer, Counselor, Attorney Esquire for they do
not have a CONTRACT WITH YOU and the Judge is trying to assist the Lawyer to obtain. The Judge has
no power over you until you give him/her your name or you get an Attorney or you try to address the
Subject Matter before his/her Court.

4. Any documents you receive after filing this AFFIDAVIT with the Lawyer, Attorney, Counselor,
Esquire, simply "REFUSE FOR FRAUD" Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b), which is Fraud and
Condition of Mind; U.C.C. 3-501, which is No Contract; U.C.C. 3-505, which is Produce the Contract;
F.R.C.P- 10(a), which is a Fictitious Name.

5. This AFFIDAVIT must be answered by the Attorney, Lawyer, Counselor, Esquire by

AFFIDAVIT, rebutting with Controverting (Solid, factual and provable) evidence to each point raised in
this AFFIDAVIT. They can never answer this AFFIDAVIT for they are in a FOREIGN JURISDICTION
and they do not have SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. You are in a Judicial setting which is
Constitutional, and you are under the American Peace Flag and they are under the Gold Fringed Flag.
They are also committing Barratry on every point they raise, for from the beginning they have addressed
you with a F.R.C.P- 10(a) Fictitious Name-

6. Be sure and place your AMERICAN PEACE FLAG on your AFFIDAVIT in the upper left hand
Corner to the left of your name and address as you are looking at the page. Also place the AMERICAN
PEACE FLAG on the copy that you enter into the Court Records.

7. This now places this document into the Court Records as an INCORPORATED CASE OR
CAUSE and now it becomes your document and you are the movant of the Cause or Case. You simply
"REFUSE FOR CAUSE" from that point on. They must gain SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION over
you and you are the only one who can give it to them. They will try to trick you in many ways, simply
"REFUSE FOR CAUSE", any paperwork sent to you from anyone (unless you get a dismissal with
prejudice in the original suit brought), then you do nothing. On any Phone Calls, simply ask the caller (and
record the conversation if possible) (tell them you are recording) what jurisdiction he/she are under at that
time. They will either hang up or try to get you to discuss Subject Matter.

138
 IT HAS BEEN DECLARED,

THERE SHALL BE TIME NO LONGER!

Till I Collapse: https://youtu.be/ymQKGefM554

139
 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
WESTERN DIVISION

United States of America )

ex rel. XXXX XXXXX, )
Plaintiff/Relator, ) )
v. )
)
) Case No: ________________
Federal Reserve Bank of New York City, )
Mr. William C. Dudley, President, )
and unidentified officers; ET AL.) ) FILED UNDER SEAL
) AND IN CAMERA
)
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, )
Ms. Janet Yellen, CEO, )
and unidentified officers; )

THE FOLLOWING ENTITIES, WITH THEIR CHIEF OFFICERS, WHO ARE

PUBLICLY IDENTIFIED AS PRIMARY DEALERS:

Bank of Nova Scotia, New York agency,

BMO Capital Markets Corp.,
BNP Paribas Securities Corp.,
Barclays Capital Inc.,
Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.,
Citigroup Global Markets Inc.,
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC,
Daiwa Capital Markets America Inc.,
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.,
Goldman, Sachs & Co.,
HSBC Securities (USA) Inc.,
Jefferies LLC,
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC,
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.,
Mizuho Securities USA Inc.,
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC,
Nomura Securities International, Inc.,
RBC Capital Markets, LLC,
RBS Securities Inc.,
SG Americas Securities, LLC,
UBS Securities LLC., Defendants.
Page 1 of 14

140
 COMPLAINT

INTRODUCTION
1.1 Mr. James XXXXXX (the “relator”) brings this action on behalf of the
United States of America against defendants for treble damages and civil penalties arising
from the defendants' hiding of profit and lack of reporting such profit from Congress in
violation of the civil False Claims Act, Title 31, section 3729 (a)(1)(G) who “knowingly
and improperly avoids or decreases an obligation to pay or transmit money or property to
the Government.” and section 3729 (a)(1)(C) who “conspires to commit a violation of
subparagraph ...(G).”
1.2 The violation of the False Claims Act arise because defendants knowingly
and intentionally conceal from the government approximately six hundred (600) times
annually a total amount equal to the value of deficit spending of the government. A
contorted accounting scam and hidden records are used by the defendants to cover the
perfidy.
1.3 The Federal Reserve Bank of New York (hereinafter FRBNY) has
exclusive control of the redemption records. This authority is used to control receipts and
disbursements of all Treasury security auctions. The records have never been
independently audited.
1.4 The profit is hidden from the United States in violation of Title 12 sections
289 and 290 which specify net profit of the Federal Reserve system is the property of the
United States. (Ref. Section 7, paragraphs 1 and 2 of Federal Reserve Act of 1913).
1.5 Statutory requirement of Title 12, section 247 for a complete report of the
system to be periodically made to Congress is also routinely violated.

THE PARTIES
2.1 Plaintiff James XXXXX resides in XXXXX County, _____________ in this
judicial district and is an adult citizen of the United States.
2.2 The FRBNY is a privately owned corporation operating on a franchise
granted by the BOG. It has statutory authority to sue or be sued. It is located at 33 Liberty
Street, New York City, New York.
2.3 Mr. William C. Dudley is employed by the United States and is the
President and CEO of FRBNY. Additional officers of the FRBNY with current or past
authority to sign and approve transfers of funds from the accounts of Treasury auctions
are unknown at this time.
2.4 The BOG is believed to be a privately held corporation owned by select
Primary Dealers. It operates as a government contractor that has assumed the guise of a
federal agency. It has statutory authority to sue or be sued. The office is located on
Constitution Ave NW, Washington, DC 20551.
2.5 Ms. Janet Yellen is an employee of the United States and is Chief
Executive Officer of the BOG. Additional officers of the BOG who are responsible for
current and past supervising and auditing the FRBNY operations are unknown at this
time.
2.6 The Bank of Nova Scotia is located at 1 Liberty Plaza, New York, N.Y.

141
10006. Mr. Daniel Santiago is the manager. No agent for service has been found.
[ Paragraphs 2.7 through 2.27 listing individual defendants with addresses deleted
in this internet posting for brevity.]

JURISDICTION, CAUSE OF ACTION AND VENUE

3.1 This court has jurisdiction over False Claim Act violations filed by a
citizen pursuant to Title 31, section 3730(b)(1). Title 31, section 3732(a) authorizes
nationwide service of process and provides that an action under the False Claims Act
“may be brought in any judicial district in which the defendant...can be found, resides,
transacts business, or in which any act proscribed by section 3729 occurred.” Jurisdiction
is additionally established by Title 28, section 1331 (violation of U.S. law), section 1348
(a national bank), and section 1347 (collection of any revenue).

DEFENDANT FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK

3.2 Defendant Federal Reserve Bank of New York (FRBNY) is a privately
owned corporation that transacts business in this jurisdictional area. It is empowered to
sue or be sued. Ref. 12 USC #341. Title 31, section 3729(a)(1)(G) provision has been
broadened to provide a cause of action to include any defendant “...who ...knowingly
conceals or improperly avoids or decreases an obligation to pay or transmit money or
property to the Government.” Nationwide service of process for defendants that
“transacts business” in the court's jurisdictional area is authorized by Title 31, section
3732(a). The FRBNY will accept auction bids from local customers and thereby transacts
business in this area.

DEFENDANTS PRIMARY DEALER

3.3 Title 31, section 3732(a) authorizes nationwide service on any codefendant
“in the case of multiple defendants, (where) any one defendant ...transacts
business...” Each Primary Dealer is alleged to have violated Title 31, section 3729(a)(1)
(G) by receiving and hiding profit from the Federal Reserve operation.

DEFENDANT FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD OF GOVERNORS

3.4 Defendant Federal Reserve Board of Governors (BOG) is the franchise holder of
the FRBNY. It is authorized to sue or be sued. Ref. 12 USC #248(p). It has
administrative control and regulatory authority over each Federal Reserve Bank. It has
the legislated responsibility for auditing and reporting to Congress an annual “complete
report” of the Federal Reserve system. A systemic violation of the Charter law of the
Federal Reserve legislation by any Federal Reserve Bank, and not corrected or reported
to Congress, is an entity that “Conspires to commit a violation of subparagraph ...(G)” in
violation of Title 31, section 3729(a)(1)(C).
3.5 An unlawful practice by any government employee or entity negates any
claim of sovereign immunity.
3.6 The BOG maintains the guise of a Federal agency. In fact, the BOG
operates as a government contractor. It has no lawful claim of sovereign immunity.
3.7 The BOG is subject to court process as respondent superior and as an
indispensable party for any alleged systemic unlawful operation of any Federal Reserve
bank.

142
3.8 The BOG is a privately held corporation secretly owned by select Primary
Dealers. The primary allegiance is to its owners. A government agency is established for
the benefit of society. Any government agency established for the benefit of a corporate
enterprise in violation of its charter of creation is a legal nullity that is void from its
inception and negates any claim to sovereign immunity.
3.9 Federal Rule of Procedure 19 authorizes joinder of alleged owners of the
BOG as indispensable parties and recipients of purloined funds. FRCvP 17 joins parties
of the real interest.
3.10 The jurisdictional bar of Title 31, section 3730 (e)(4) is not applicable.
3.11 Venue is proper in this district pursuant to Title 31, section 3732(a) where
“any one defendant... transacts business...”

BACKGROUND
4.1 The Federal Reserve Bank of New York (FRBNY) and the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve (BOG) were created by legislation of 1913 that was
formulated at a clandestine meeting of Wall Street and European bankers secluded on
Jekyll Island. The legislation is codified as Title 12 sections 221 through 522.
4.2 The economic structure was modeled after historic European systems that
had benefited various rulers and financiers but left the nations in financial ruin and
widespread riots with confiscation of estates and physical harm to the perpetrators.
Hence, the latest model conceals the perpetrators.
4.3 Ownership of the BOG has been alleged by various authors but requests
pursuant to FOIA for verification of ownership are stonewalled with website links that
are uninformative. Ownership of the BOG is not a matter of public record.
4.4 Since the trail of money leads to the Primary Dealers, each member of that
group is assumed to be an owner of the BOG.
4.5 FOIA requests for the identities of those responsible for compiling the
screened lists (and the original 1913 list) submitted for government appointment as
Federal Reserve officers are rebuffed Those parties are the owners of the BOG.
4.6 Supervisory and regulatory control of all Federal Reserve banks is vested
in the BOG; the Federal Reserve banks are franchisees controlled by the BOG.
4.7 The Federal Reserve banks have been held to operate as private
corporations.
4.8 The object of the Federal Reserve system is to embezzle the hidden profit
as exposed in this action.
4.9 The source of initial operating funds to establish operations in 1913 was
from the owners of the BOG.

OPERATION OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE

DEFICIT SPENDING
5.1 Deficit spending occurs when Congress approves such act. The U.S.
Treasury can then send a Treasury security (bill, bond or note; i.e., marketable securities)
as collateral to the FRBNY. The FRBNY then increases the government's line of credit
(book entry money) by that amount. The act is identified as a “loan” from the Federal
Reserve. The source of the loan is never identified as having the value before the “loan”

143
but somehow the money comes from an unknown source. The government pays for
services by vendors from the account. When a vendor requests “cash” from a commercial
bank after depositing the check, the vendor will receive Federal Reserve Notes (FRN),
i.e. an voucher acknowledging debt from the Federal Reserve system identified as a legal
tender. A legal tender is an alternate item from that which was contracted. The vendor
requests “dollars” when the check is cashed but is given FRN's as a substitute which, by
law must be accepted for the requested item.
5.2 The FRBNY will sell the Treasury security (as a component of a roll-over
security) by auction with a superficial appearance by the U.S. Treasury.

AUCTIONS OF MARKETABLE TREASURY SECURITIES

5.3 Bids for auctions of Treasury Marketable securities are jointly received by
the FRBNY and select government branches. The auctions are open to the public.
Approximately 70 percent of sales is to the Primary Dealers who place bids with the
FRBNY.
5.4 Each security identifies how much goes for roll-over and how much is for
deficit spending. Approximately 85 percent of auctioned securities are used to fund
rollover
for maturing or redeemed Treasury securities. Security value for deficit spending is
about 15 percent. In this Complaint, the terms may be used to designate 100 percent of
each security for clarity.

ROLL-OVER SECURITIES
5.5 Funds received by auctioning securities for redemption of securities in the
market may be received by the government or the FRBNY. They are credited to a
government account by the FRBNY. Since they are credited to the government, there is
no increase in the National Debt nor is there any increase in the amount of currency in
circulation. The government balance sheet lists these funds as assets under Marketable
securities.
5.6 The Treasury makes a list of securities that are being recalled before
maturity with the price they will pay. The Primary Dealers are largely responsible for
Page 8 of 14
collecting listed or maturing securities for redemption.
5.7 The FRBNY has exclusive management and accounting control of
redemption accounts for the government. The accounts have never been independently
audited nor are they reported to Congress as required by law.

DEFICIT SPENDING SECURITIES

5.8 Deficit spending securities are auctioned as a small component of each
roll-over security. While temporarily shown on government balance sheets, the funds are
not available to pay for government services. If the funds belonged to the government,
there would be no increase in the National Debt nor would there be an increase in money
in circulation (inflation). The retention of the value within the Federal Reserve system is
concealed.
5.9 Revenue from both deficit and roll-over auctioned securities appears on the
government balance sheet under “Marketable” securities. Purchases of maturing
securities are listed under “Redemptions.” FRBNY has exclusive control of accounts for

144
redemption. This authority is used to pay the defendants their share of profit from deficit
spending. [ Recent changes in TreaauryDirect, methods identify “new cash” and
“Publicly Held Maturing” as the two approved titles. Ref.
https://www.treasurydirect.gov/instit/annceresult/press/press_cashpydwn.htm ]
5.10 While the funds from various auctions appear on the balance sheet of the
government, the FRBNY has exclusive authority to handle disbursements of redeemed
securities. This authority is used to cover paying funds from deficit spending to the
owners of the BOG. Ref. 31 CFR 375.3.
5.11 Funds received from auctioning deficit spending securities are ostensibly
used to pay back the “loan” that created the book-entry money—while concealing the
payment from public records. The defendant owners of the BOG advance no
consideration for the above “loan” or transactions. If the defendants has advanced value
in the “loan,” there would have been no increase in the amount of money in circulation
(inflation) and there would have been no increase in the National debt; i.e., no book-entry
creation of money.
5.12 The owners of the BOG receives the entire value of deficit spending as a
net profit by this handling. There is no consideration advanced by the defendants. The net
profit of the Federal Reserve system legally belongs to the government.
5.13 It is impossible to pay off the National Debt that is created by the above
transactions. Every “dollar” in circulation has been created as the principal of a “loan”
but requires repayment of principal plus interest. The interest is never created; it does not
exist. It is a loan that cannot be culminated. [Commercial bank creation of fractional
reserve money does not affect this conclusion.]
5.14 Defendants Primary Dealers, whose ancestors contrived and established
the scam to acquire humongous profit, receive funds from deficit spending securities with
full knowledge that the money is the fruit of a scam.
5.15 Defendant Board of Governors is a full and willing accomplice in the
scam and provides concealment of its action from public awareness.
5.16 The National Debt in February 2009 was $10.6 trillion; the debt on
February 2015 is $18.1 trillion. Total amount of funds concealed within the statutory
limit of six years exceeds $7.4 trillion.
5.17 There are approximately 600 auctions of Treasury securities annually.
Assuming each have a deficit spending component, each auction is a violation of the
defendant's obligation to transfer such money to the government. A six year period would
involve approximately 3600 violations subject to a statutory civil penalty up to $10,000
for each violation.

6.1 WHEREFORE, Relator requests judgment against defendants for

three times the amount improperly concealed by the Federal Reserve system; for the
maximum civil penalty for each violation of the False Claims Act; for the minimum
statutory amount authorized to the Relator; for court costs and expenses; and for such
further relief as the Court deems just and proper.

NOTICE
7.1 As required by the False Claims Act for full disclosure of material
evidence, Relator conveys to this court that the perfidy of the Federal Reserve has been

145
the subject of an article written by the Relator and distributed to various internet
websites, including http://www.scribd.com/doc/49040689/RIP-OFF-BY-THE-
FEDERAL-RESERVE-Feb-17-2011 . The mathematical progression concludes the
Federal Reserve is a Ponzi scheme inherently designed for economic self-destruction.

The writing is subject to random revision. A succinct analysis of money creation is also
posted at http://www.scribd.com/doc/101937790/Federal-Reserve-Heist.

To the best of my belief, there are good and worthy grounds to support this suit.
Name deleted, Relator
address deleted March ______, 2023
deleted
*** *** ****
Declaration of Service
It is hereby Declared and Affirmed that one copy of this COMPLAINT has been mailed
to the ATTN. of the Head County District Attorney (D.A.), or in the alternative, the
County Prosecutor, located at: 400 East 9th. Street, Fifth Floor, Kansas City, Missouri
64106. In
continuing the practice of the prior D.A.’s and as of yet, no service is made upon the U.S.
Attorney General.

Relator
address deleted March ______, 20____
address deleted
phone deleted
[amended filing refused by the court without counsel. No lawyer with a British Accredited Registry
(BAR#) will accept the position of counsel.]

Isaiah 40, Isaiah 41, Isaiah 42 , Isaiah 43, Isaiah 44,

Isaiah 45, Isaiah 46, Isaiah 47, Isaiah 48,
Isaiah 49, et al.,

146
 MODEL FEDERAL RESERVE BANK FREE CITY ORDINANCE

Section 1. Name

Section 2. Purpose

Section 3. Findings

Section 4. Prohibitions

Section 5. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK-Free Contracts and Investments

Section 6. Reporting and Information

Section 7. Community Right to Know

Section 8. Public Notice of FEDERAL RESERVE BANK-Free Zone

Section 9. Enforcement

Section 10. Severability

Section 1 Name.

147
This Chapter shall be known as _The FEDERAL RESERVE BANK-free Zone_of
Denver, Colorado.

Section 2. Purpose.
The purpose of this Ordinance is to make Denver FEDERAL RESERVE BANK-Free;
that is:

A. To maintain and preserve the Supreme Law of the Land as set forth in the Constitution
of the state of Colorado, and of these United States to the benefit of the people of the City
of Denver, including but not limited to, the freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly
and petition, and the rights to bear arms, to trial by jury, to the privilege against self-
incrimination and to the common law writ of habeas corpus.

B. To oppose the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK Charter(s) as an illegitimate and

unconstitutional charter.

C. To resist the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK’ unconstitutional and illegal usurpation of

American sovereignty.

D. To restore completely the People of the Several States as the final and ultimate civil
authority in these United States of America.

E. To recognize no executive, legislative or judicial power within the city limits other
than those powers duly constituted by the People in the Constitution of the State of
Colorado and by the Peoples of the Several States in the United States Constitution.

F. To protect the citizens of the city of Denver, especially those who are members of the
United States armed forces, from involuntary servitude to the FEDERAL RESERVE
BANK of Denver, or otherwise.

G. To rid the city of Denver, the presence of any and all FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
personnel and facilities.

H. To refuse any and all FEDERAL RESERVE BANK funded programs, studies, or
other activities within the city limits of Denver, Colorado.

I. To prohibit the investment of any City funds in any business, government agency or
other entity which supports or cooperates with the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK.

J. To protect the citizens of the city of Denver, Colorado from taxation without
representation, by forbidding the implementation within the city limits of any tax, levy,
fee, assessment, surcharge, or any other financial imposition by the FEDERAL
RESERVE BANK.

K. To establish a citizen’s right to know about, and to increase citizen awareness of, the
activities of the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK.

148
Section 3. Findings
The People of Denver, Colorado find that:

A. The City Council of this city is bound by oath and affirmation to support the
Constitution of the United States and, pursuant to that oath and Article VI of the United
States Constitution, to obey only treaties “made under the Authority of the United
States.”

B. The FEDERAL RESERVE BANK Charter is not a treaty “made under the Authority
of the United States,” but an illegitimate and unconstitutional Act, under an international
constitution, having never been submitted to, nor ratified by, the People of the United
States, as required by Declaration of Independence, the charter of our nation.

C. The United States government has absolutely no constitutional authority to participate

in any FEDERAL RESERVE BANK program or activity, and FEDERAL RESERVE
BANK personnel and facilities have absolutely no legal right to be within the geographic
boundaries of the United States.

D. The Congress, the President, and the Supreme Court of the United States, in violation
of their sworn constitutional duties under Article VI of the United States Constitution,
have utterly failed to protect the American people from the FEDERAL RESERVE
BANK’ usurpation of the sovereignty of the American people, including the sovereign
powers of the people of this city.

E. The City Council, bound by its oath to support the Constitution of the United States
and by its duties under Article VI of the United States Constitution, must protect the
sovereignty of this city and of its people, and to that end,

1. No citizen of this city shall be required to serve the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK in
any capacity.

2. No FEDERAL RESERVE BANK personnel or facilities may be present or may be

located within the geographic limits of this city.

3. No FEDERAL RESERVE BANK funded programs, studies or other FEDERAL

RESERVE BANK sponsored or funded activities may take place within the geographic
limits of this city.

4. No city funds may be invested in, nor may any city personnel participate with, any
business, government agency or other entity which supports or cooperates in any way
with the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK.

F. The People of this city have a right to know about the unconstitutional and unlawful
activities of the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK, as they impact on this community, and

149
the City Council has a duty to its people to increase citizen awareness of the FEDERAL
RESERVE BANK through community, school, and civic educational programs.

Section 4. Prohibitions

A. Cessation of Present Activities. No person, corporation, school, college, university,

institution, or other entity shall within the City of Denver, knowingly aid or abet any
illegal or unconstitutional activity of the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK or of any entity
financially supported by or affiliated with the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK. This
prohibition shall take effect no more than two years after the adoption of this ordinance.

B. Commencement of Work for the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK. No person,

corporation, school, college, university, institution, or other entity which is not, as of the
date this ordinance is adopted, engaged in any work for the FEDERAL RESERVE
BANK, or any entity financially supported by or affiliated with the FEDERAL
RESERVE BANK, shall, within the City of Denver, aid or abet any illegal or
unconstitutional activity of the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK or of any entity
financially supported by or affiliated with the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK.

C. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK Flags and Symbols. No flag, symbol, or other logo
of the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK shall be displayed on city property, provided
however, that this prohibition does not apply to a photograph or other pictorial display of
such flags, symbols or logos as part of an exhibit of an historical nature.

D. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK Personnel. No FEDERAL RESERVE BANK

personnel may conduct any official FEDERAL RESERVE BANK activity of any kind
whatsoever and, under no circumstances, may FEDERAL RESERVE BANK Agent(s) or
other hired troops be quartered on any property within the geographic limits of this City.

E. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK Tax. No tax, levy, surcharge, fee, assessment, or

other financial burden authorized by the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK may be imposed
on or collected from any person within the geographic limits of this City.

F. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK Restraints. No arrest or restraint of the liberty of any

citizen of this City by any official acting under the authority of the FEDERAL
RESERVE BANK may be effected within the geographic limits of this City.

G. International Court Decree. No judicial order, decree or judgment entered by any

international court under the authority of the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK shall be
enforceable within the geographic limits of this City.

Section 5. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK Free Contracts and Investments

A. Contracts. The City of Denver shall grant no contract to any person, business or
nonprofit entity which knowingly engages in work for the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK,

150
or for any entity supported by or affiliated with the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK, unless
the City Council makes a specific determination that no reasonable alternative exists,
taking into consideration the following factors:

1. The intent and purposes of this ordinance;

2. The availability of alternative services, goods and equipment, or other supplies

substantially meeting the required specifications of the proposed contract; and

3. Quantifiable additional costs resulting from use of available alternatives.

B. Investments. The City of Denver shall refrain from making any new investments in
businesses that knowingly engage in work, whether with or without remuneration, for the
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK, including advertising support of, subsidies for, or
promotions of the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK, its supporters and affiliates, and their
activities. Within two years of the adoption of this ordinance, the City of Denver shall
divest itself from all such investments currently held by it (including pension funds).
The City Council shall adopt a economically responsible plan with respect to city pension
fund and other investments and shall implement such plan consistent with the intent of
this ordinance.

Section 6. Reports and Information

In the event that Section 4A or B is unenforceable, and so long as any work for or
with the
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK, its financed supporters and affiliates continues within the
City of Denver, the following monitoring of such activities shall be carried out by the
City through such agencies as the City Council shall designate.

A. Annual Reporting. Each person, corporation, school, college, university, institution,

or other entity engaged in work for or with the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK, its
supporters or affiliates (hereinafter designated as “FEDERAL RESERVE BANK agent”)
shall prepare an annual report which details the activities and programs engaged in,
names the agency or entity worked for or with, states the nature of the relationship
between that agency or entity and the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK and specifies the
reasons for continuation of such work or relationship. These annual reports shall be filed
with the designated city agency or agencies and shall also be made available for
inspection and copying by any interested member of the public.

B. Information. The City Council may require any FEDERAL RESERVE BANK agent
to provide such further information as the Council deems is necessary to keep the
community adequately informed of “FEDERAL RESERVE BANK activity” within the
City and at such reasonable times and places as the City Council determines.

C. Signs. Every facility within the City of Denver in which work for or with the
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK, its supporters or affiliates takes place shall be required to

151
install and maintain signs clearly visible to any passing person, identifying the facility
with the legend “FEDERAL RESERVE BANK WORK CONDUCTED HERE.”

D. Fee: Each FEDERAL RESERVE BANK agent shall be assessed a fee at rates to be
determined by the City which shall be at least adequate to cover, in the aggregate, the
costs of administering this act.

Section 7. Community Right to Know

The City of Denver, through its own agencies and in cooperation with other local
government agencies and educational organizations and interested citizen groups, shall
assist and promote educational activities, including but not limited to curriculum in
public schools and adult education programs, to advance public awareness and
understanding of work for the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK, its supporters and affiliates
and related matters as addressed in this ordinance.

Section 8. Public Notice of FEDERAL RESERVE BANK-Free Zone

Every road entering the City of Denver which has a sign marking the City limits as of the
date of the passage of this ordinance, and every road entering the City of Denver, which
shall, after the passage of this ordinance, be so marked, will also be marked equally
prominently with a sign reading “FEDERAL RESERVE BANK-free zone, established
by City Ordinance 2015.” These signs shall be posted no later than ninety (90) days
after passage of this ordinance, and shall be at least two feet by three feet in size.

Section 9. Enforcement
Each violation of this ordinance shall be punishable by up to thirty days imprisonment
and a five hundred dollar fine. Each day shall be deemed a separate violation. Residents
of the City of Denver shall also have the right to enforce this ordinance by appropriate
civil actions for declaratory or injunctive relief.

Section 10. Severability

If any section, subsection, paragraph, or word of this ordinance shall be held to be
invalid, either on its face or as applied, the invalidity of such provision shall not affect the
other sections, subsections paragraphs, sentences or words of this ordinance and the
application thereof; and to that end the sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences and
words of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable.

152
 THE MAN FROM THE SEA

CHAP. XIII.
1 Hee seeth in his dreame a man comming out of the sea. 25 The declaration of his dreame.
54 He is praised, and promised to see more.

153
1
 And it came to passe after seuen dayes, I dreamed a dreame by night.
2
 And loe, there arose a winde from the sea that it mooued all the waues thereof.2
3
 And I beheld, and loe, that man waxed strong with the thousands of heauen: and
when he turned his countenance to looke, all the things trembled that were seene
vnder him.3
4
 And whensoeuer the voyce went out of his mouth, all they burnt, that heard his
voyce, like as the earth faileth when it feeleth the fire.
5
 And after this I beheld, and loe, there was gathered together a multitude of men
out of number, from the foure windes of the heauen, to subdue the man that came
out of the sea.
6
 But I beheld, and loe, hee had graued himselfe a great mountaine, and flew vp
vpon it.
7
 But I would haue seene the region, or place, whereout the hill was grauen, and I
could not.
8
 And after this I beheld, and loe, all they which were gathered together to subdue
him, were sore afraid, and yet durst fight.
9
 And loe, as hee saw the violence of the multitude that came, hee neither lift vp his
hand, nor held sword, nor any instrument of warre.
10
 But onely I saw that he sent out of his mouth, as it had bene a blast
of fire, and out of his lippes a flaming breath, and out of his tongue
he cast out sparkes and tempests,
11
 And they were all mixt together; the blast of fire, the flaming breath,
and the great tempest, and fel with violence vpon the multitude,
which was prepared to fight, and burnt them vp euery one, so that
vpon a sudden, of an innumerable multitude, nothing was to be
perceiued, but onely dust and smell of smoke: whē I saw this, I was
afraid.
12
 Afterward saw I the same man come downe from the mountaine,
and call vnto him an other peaceable multitude.
13
 And there came much people vnto him, whereof some were glad,
some were sory, some of them were bound, and other some brought
of them that were offred: then was I sicke through great feare, and I
awaked and said, 13

154
155