Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AB ST R ACT
A B
Factors Factors
A
A
D D
B B
AA AA
AD AD
AB BB
BB C
DD
DD AC
C CC
AC BD
CC CD
0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50
apples took into account: the tem- samples after osmotic dehydration at
perature and sucrose concentration 20C̊ were characterized by harder
(A-D) (Fig. 1; Tab. 2). tissue. The harder tissue meant that a
Mechanical properties of osmoti- shorter time was needed to compress
cally dehydrated apples which were them to 20 N. This was a result of
simultaneously calcium impregnated water content reduction. Furthermore,
mainly depended on dehydration the addition of calcium ions to the
temperature (Fig. 1; Tab. 2). The osmotic solution caused higher os-
influence of the sucrose solution motic pressure. As a consequence,
concentration on mechanical prop- water content decreased, the tissue
erties of dehydrated apples was also lost turgidity and samples were
significant. The thickness of the softer.
samples did not have an influence as Osmotic dehydration of 5 mm-
far as the mechanical properties of -thick samples of apples during 3 or
the apples were concerned, although 5 h at a temperature of 40C̊ in 40%
the p-value was lower than the sig- sucrose solution with or without cal-
nificant limit (Fig. 1; Tab. 2). The cium addition, did not significantly
highest significant interaction effect effect the time factor of the compres-
of factors on the time of the com- sion test. But shorter time of dehy-
pression test in dehydrated apples dration caused the samples to be
concerned the temperature–sucrose softer and therefore about a 50%
concentration pair (A-D) and a slightly more time was needed for the com-
less effect was found in the tem- pression test than osmotic dehydration
perature -time pair (A-B) (Tab. 2; within a 1 h time span (Fig. 3).
Fig. 1, 2). The effect of the thickness of apple
As a result of the higher tempera- samples after osmotic dehydration
ture of osmotic dehydration of apples, was significant in apples subjected to
the loosened and partially damaged additional calcium impregnation (Tab.
tissue was a particular consequence 2; Fig. 1). For example apples
involved in the longer time of com- osmodehydrated at a temperature of
pression needed to obtain 20 N force. 20C̊ in 40% sucrose solution needed
The temperature increase from 20C̊ a slightly shorter (by up to 30%) time
do 60C̊ during 3 hours of osmotic of compression force ( 20N) for 5 mm-
dehydration of 10 mm-thick samples thick samples then for 15 mm-thick
in 20% and 60% sucrose solution ones, especially at the higher tempera-
caused compression time to last almost ture of 60C̊ (Tab. 3). The addition of
3 times longer. When this process calcium ions to the osmotic solution
was carried out with calcium ions, during the dehydration of apples had a
the compression time lasted almost slightly worse influence on the mech-
4–5 times longer (Fig. 2). A similar anical properties. The parameters
effect took place when the sucrose needed to obtain the average mech-
concentration was increased to the anical properties were: temperature
range of 20-60% (Fig. 2). Apple 20-35C̊ (regarding osmotic dehydration
Value of factors
Osmotic dehydration
Osmotic dehydra-
Factors with calcium
tion impregnation
chloride
Thickness of sam- 15 15 5 15
Sucrose concentration 25 60 23 60
[%]
with and without calcium ions), time ions) and a low sucrose concentration
of dehydration (independently of proc- of about 25% (Tab. 3). These results
essing with or without calcium ions were in variance with other results in
impregnation) 1 h, thickness of sam- literature (Abud-Achila et al., 2008).
ples 5 and 15 mm (regarding osmotic Rodrigues et al. (2003) affirmed
dehydration with and without calcium that the addition of calcium ions to the
ST RE S Z C ZE NI E
Sł
owa kluczowe: test ś
ciskania, nasą
czanie wapniem, planowanie eksperymentów