Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(1) It enables the FASB to issue more useful and consistent standards in the future.
(2) New issues will be more quickly solvable by reference to an existing framework of
basic theory.
Relevance and faithful representation are the two primary qualities of useful accounting
information. For information to be relevant, it should be capable of making a difference
in a decision by helping users to form predictions about the outcomes of past, present,
and future events or to confirm or correct expectations. Faithful representation of a
measure rests on whether the numbers and descriptions match what really existed or
happened.
The relevant criteria for assessing materiality will depend upon the circumstances and the
nature of the item and will vary greatly among companies. For example, an error in
current assets or current liabilities will be more important for a company with a flow of
funds problem than for one with adequate working capital.
The effect upon net income (or earnings per share) is the most commonly used measure
of materiality. This reflects the prime importance attached to net income by investors and
other users of the statements. The effects upon assets and equities are also important as
are misstatements of individual accounts and subtotals included in the financial
statements. The FASB is proposing a definition of materiality in the Conceptual
Framework, which will be aligned with that in the securities laws and which can used in
disclosure decisions.
There are no rigid standards or guidelines for assessing materiality. The lower bound of
materiality has been variously estimated at 5% of net income, but the determination will
vary based upon the individual case and might not fall within these limits. Certain items,
such as a questionable loan to a company officer, may be considered material even when
minor amounts are involved. In contrast a large misclassification among expense
accounts may not be deemed material if there is no misstatement of net income.
6. What are the enhancing qualities of the qualitative characteristics?
7. What are the five basic assumptions that underlie the financial accounting
structure? Describe the major constraint inherent in the presentation of accounting
information.
8. What are some of the costs of providing accounting information? What are some of
the benefits of accounting information? Describe the cost-benefit factors that should
be considered when new accounting standards are being proposed.
9. What are some of the most important specific differences between IFRS and U.S.
GAAP?
IFRS is used in more than 110 countries around the world, including the EU and many Asian and
South American countries. GAAP, on the other hand, is only used in the United States.
Companies that operate in the U.S. and overseas may have more complexities in their
accounting.
GAAP tends to be more rules-based, while IFRS tends to be more principles-based. Under
GAAP, companies may have industry-specific rules and guidelines to follow, while IFRS has
principles that require judgment and interpretation to determine how they are to be applied in a
given situation.
3. Inventory Methods
Both GAAP and IFRS allow First In, First out (FIFO), weighted-average cost, and specific
identification methods for valuing inventories. However, GAAP also allows the Last In, First out
(LIFO) method, which is not allowed under IFRS. Using the LIFO method may result in
artificially low net income and may not reflect the actual flow of inventory items through a
company.
Both methods allow inventories to be written down to market value. However, if the market
value later increases, only IFRS allows the earlier write-down to be reversed. Under GAAP,
reversal of earlier write-downs is prohibited. Inventory valuation may be more volatile under
IFRS.
IFRS allows revaluation of the following assets to fair value if fair value can be measured
reliably: inventories, property, plant & equipment, intangible assets, and investments in
marketable securities. This revaluation may be either an increase or a decrease to the asset’s
value. Under GAAP, revaluation is prohibited except for marketable securities.
6. Impairment Losses
Both standards allow for the recognition of impairment losses on long-lived assets when the
market value of an asset declines. When conditions change, IFRS allows impairment losses to be
reversed for all types of assets except goodwill. GAAP takes a more conservative approach and
prohibits reversals of impairment losses for all types of assets.
7. Intangible Assets
Internal costs to create intangible assets, such as development costs, are capitalized under IFRS
when certain criteria are met. These criteria include consideration of the future economic
benefits.
Under GAAP, development costs are expensed as incurred, with the exception of internally
developed software. For software that will be used externally, costs are capitalized once
technological feasibility has been demonstrated. If the software will only be used internally,
GAAP requires capitalization only during the development stage. IFRS has no specific guidance
for software.
8. Fixed Assets
GAAP requires that long-lived assets, such as buildings, furniture and equipment, be valued at
historic cost and depreciated appropriately. Under IFRS, these same assets are initially valued at
cost, but can later be revalued up or down to market value. Any separate components of an asset
with different useful lives are required to be depreciated separately under IFRS. GAAP allows
for component depreciation, but it is not required.
9. Investment Property
IFRS includes the distinct category of investment property, which is defined as property held for
rental income or capital appreciation. Investment property is initially measured at cost, and can
be subsequently revalued to market value. GAAP has no such separate category.
While the approaches under GAAP and IFRS share a common framework, there are a few
notable differences. IFRS has an exception, which allows lessees to exclude leases for low-
valued assets, while GAAP has no such exception. The IFRS standard includes leases for some
kinds of intangible assets, while GAAP categorically excludes leases of all intangible assets from
the scope of the lease accounting standard.
11. Describe the Key differences between the IFRS and GAAP by giving emphasis with
respect to the following items:
Financial statements (balance sheet, Profit/loss statement, cash flow statement)
Inventory
Fixed assets
Intangible assets
Impairment of assets
Leases
IFRS is used in more than 110 countries around the world, including the EU and many Asian and
South American countries. GAAP, on the other hand, is only used in the United States.
Companies that operate in the U.S. and overseas may have more complexities in their
accounting.
GAAP tends to be more rules-based, while IFRS tends to be more principles-based. Under
GAAP, companies may have industry-specific rules and guidelines to follow, while IFRS has
principles that require judgment and interpretation to determine how they are to be applied in a
given situation.
3. Inventory Methods
Both GAAP and IFRS allow First In, First out (FIFO), weighted-average cost, and specific
identification methods for valuing inventories. However, GAAP also allows the Last In, First out
(LIFO) method, which is not allowed under IFRS. Using the LIFO method may result in
artificially low net income and may not reflect the actual flow of inventory items through a
company.
Both methods allow inventories to be written down to market value. However, if the market
value later increases, only IFRS allows the earlier write-down to be reversed. Under GAAP,
reversal of earlier write-downs is prohibited. Inventory valuation may be more volatile under
IFRS.
6. Impairment Losses
Both standards allow for the recognition of impairment losses on long-lived assets when the
market value of an asset declines. When conditions change, IFRS allows impairment losses to be
reversed for all types of assets except goodwill. GAAP takes a more conservative approach and
prohibits reversals of impairment losses for all types of assets.
7. Intangible Assets
Internal costs to create intangible assets, such as development costs, are capitalized under IFRS
when certain criteria are met. These criteria include consideration of the future economic
benefits.
Under GAAP, development costs are expensed as incurred, with the exception of internally
developed software. For software that will be used externally, costs are capitalized once
technological feasibility has been demonstrated. If the software will only be used internally,
GAAP requires capitalization only during the development stage. IFRS has no specific guidance
for software.
8. Fixed Assets
GAAP requires that long-lived assets, such as buildings, furniture and equipment, be valued at
historic cost and depreciated appropriately. Under IFRS, these same assets are initially valued at
cost, but can later be revalued up or down to market value. Any separate components of an asset
with different useful lives are required to be depreciated separately under IFRS. GAAP allows
for component depreciation, but it is not required.
9. Investment Property
IFRS includes the distinct category of investment property, which is defined as property held for
rental income or capital appreciation. Investment property is initially measured at cost, and can
be subsequently revalued to market value. GAAP has no such separate category.
While the approaches under GAAP and IFRS share a common framework, there are a few
notable differences. IFRS has an exception, which allows lessees to exclude leases for low-
valued assets, while GAAP has no such exception. The IFRS standard includes leases for some
kinds of intangible assets, while GAAP categorically excludes leases of all intangible assets from
the scope of the lease accounting standard.