Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Listen
Instructor Information
Name: Sam Owen (address as “Mr. Owen”)
Email: dowen15@kennesaw.edu
Preferred Contact: Send all email via Outlook (not D2L messages); response window is within 24
hours, Mon-Fri.
Prerequisite Statement
1. Students must pass 1101/1102 with at least a “C” to enroll in 1102/2110 respectively.
https://kennesaw.view.usg.edu/d2l/le/content/2203784/viewContent/33224712/View?ou=2203784 1/13
1/12/2021 1101 Syllabus - Composition I Section W18 Spring Semester 2021 CO
2. Students who make a D or an F in English 1101 or 1102 will be required to repeat the course.
Miller, James S. Acting Out Culture: Readings for Critical Inquiry, 4th ed. Boston: Bedford/St.
Martin’s, 2018. Print. (ISBN: 978-1-319-05674-2)
Hacker, Diane and Nancy Sommers. A Writer’s Reference, 9th ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s,
2018. Print. (ISBN-13: 978-1-319-05744-2)
Learning Outcomes
1. Practice writing in situations where print and/or electronic texts are used, examining why and how
people choose to write using different technologies.
2. Interpret the explicit and implicit arguments of multiple styles of writing from diverse perspectives.
3. Practice the social aspects of the writing process by critiquing your own work and the work of your
colleagues.
4. Analyze how style, audience, social context, and purpose shape your writing in electronic and print
spaces.
5. Craft diverse types of texts to extend your thinking and writerly voice across styles, audiences, and
purposes.
Rhetorical Genre Analysis: A 750-1000 word analysis of a text based on the author's use of
rhetorical appeals and genre conventions.
Research Proposal & Annotated Bibliography: A well-researched, 500-750 word outline and an
annotated list of four tentative sources you will use to make the final project.
https://kennesaw.view.usg.edu/d2l/le/content/2203784/viewContent/33224712/View?ou=2203784 2/13
1/12/2021 1101 Syllabus - Composition I Section W18 Spring Semester 2021 CO
Final Project (Research Essay & Genre Revision): The culmination of your research from the
proposal and annotated bibliography. This project is a 5-6 page argumentative essay that will
utilize the various rhetorical appeals and techniques discussed this semester. Lastly, the
argument presented in the essay must be recreated in another genre.
D2L Assignments and Discussion Posts: Each week, there will be an online assignment or
discussion via D2L that must be completed by the next class meeting.
Peer Review
For each major essay, there will be a peer review session for students to exchange drafts.
Students are responsible for completing and sending drafts to their partners. Confirm that you
and your partner are able to leave/view comments on the respective file type. If you aren't able
to reach your partner within a reasonable window, schedule an Online Live Feedback session
with the Writing Center (who will send me an email informing me you have done so) to receive
credit for peer review.
Feedback should consist of marginal comments (using the comment feature in Word, Word
Online, or Google Docs) and a one- to two-paragraph summary of the overall impression of the
draft.
Each peer review must be sent back to your partner(s) and the instructor by the date specified in
the course schedule below.
Online Interactions
For all online discussions, where students will be expected to respond to each other, it is important to
keep writing formal and respectful. Refrain from using text-speak or other confusing abbreviations.
A: This grade represents superiority in composition, content, and style. An A is the result of originality
of thought, depth of understanding, and outstanding style as well as excellence in grammar and
development. As rhetoric, an A paper convinces the reader of the soundness and validity of its
argument. The true A paper, relatively rare, goes way beyond expectations.
B: This grade is indicative of a paper in which the material has been presented in an above-average
manner with a minimum number of errors of any kind. As rhetoric, a B paper makes a sound
argument, but lacks the brilliance of an A paper.
C: This grade represents work that is average. A C paper presents and illustrates a clearly stated
thesis and avoids serious errors; it lacks, however, the rigor of thought, development, and expression
required for a grade of A or B. A paper receiving a grade of C or higher must have few mechanical
errors. On the other hand, an essay may denote the writer's competence in grammar, punctuation,
mechanics, and diction and still receive a grade of below C because the organization or content is
unsatisfactory. As rhetoric, a C paper is an argument with perhaps some strong features, but with
some problems.
https://kennesaw.view.usg.edu/d2l/le/content/2203784/viewContent/33224712/View?ou=2203784 3/13
1/12/2021 1101 Syllabus - Composition I Section W18 Spring Semester 2021 CO
D: The D grade represents below-average, unsatisfactory work. A paper with errors in subject-verb
agreement, comma splices or fused sentences, sentence fragments, illogical sentences, or numerous
spelling errors should not be awarded a grade higher than a D. As rhetoric, the D paper has little to
commend its argument.
F: The F grade designates writing that is unacceptable at the university level. As rhetoric, the F paper
fails to persuade.
Attendance Policy
Because writing courses depend on class discussion, peer review, and practice in certain skills in
addition to lecture and presentation, the English Department's policy is that students who miss four or
more days of class—that is, more than 20%—should not receive credit for English 1101 or
1102. Attendance for online synchronous class meetings will be taken in the form of participation in
Synchronous Discussion Board assignments (labeled as such), which should be completed by
midnight to be counted present.
Technology Information
All final drafts of papers and projects must be submitted (as .doc or .docx) to D2L via the Assignment
Folder. The Assignment Folder is integrated with Turnitin, which reviews essay submissions against
essays, articles, and other written work within the system. In other words, Turnitin can identify when
writing has been plagiarized, intentionally or otherwise.
As a member of the Kennesaw State University community of scholars, I understand that my actions
are not only a reflection on myself, but also a reflection on the University and the larger body of
scholars of which it is a part. Acting unethically, no matter how minor the offense, will be detrimental to
my academic progress and self-image. It will also adversely affect all students, faculty, staff, the
reputation of this University, and the value of the degrees it awards. Whether on campus or online, I
understand that it is not only my personal responsibility, but also a duty to the entire KSU community
that I act in a manner consistent with the highest level of academic integrity. Therefore, I promise that
as a member of the Kennesaw State University community, I will not participate in any form of
academic misconduct.
The Student Handbook contains information regarding Rights Pertaining to Student Records, and
FERPA specific details are available online at: http://registrar.kennesaw.edu/ferpastudents.php
Privacy in the Education Process. A key requirement of the formal evaluation process is the protection
of individual privacy rights concerning educational grading. The University’s online learning system
and email system is designed to prevent unauthorized individuals from gaining access to sensitive
information or information protected by federal or state law. Consequently, faculty and students are
strongly encouraged to only communicate regarding course matters through the University’s
designated technology learning system.
https://kennesaw.view.usg.edu/d2l/le/content/2203784/viewContent/33224712/View?ou=2203784 5/13
1/12/2021 1101 Syllabus - Composition I Section W18 Spring Semester 2021 CO
KSU does not condone and will not tolerate sexual misconduct or sexually exploitative or harassing
behavior of any kind. The University has a comprehensive sexual misconduct policy and affirms its
responsibility to:
Respond promptly and effectively to sex discrimination, especially sexual harassment and
sexual violence;
Take immediate steps to eliminate the sexual harassment or sexual violence, prevent its
recurrence, and address its effects; and
Support all students with appropriate resources regardless of their status as complainant or
accused.
Questions about this policy should be directed to the KSU Office of Institutional Equity (OIE) and Title
IX officer by telephone at (470) 578-5189.
This policy applies broadly to all KSU employees, students, and third parties. All individuals are
encouraged to report and seek assistance regarding incidents of sexual misconduct. A student who is
under the influence of alcohol or drugs in violation of the KSU Student Code of Conduct at the time of
a sexual misconduct incident should not be reluctant to seek assistance for that reason. In order to
encourage students to come forward, disciplinary violations against a student (or against a witness)
for his or her use of alcohol or drugs will not be enforced if the student is making a good faith report of
sexual misconduct.
COVID-19 Statements
Face Masks in the classroom
https://kennesaw.view.usg.edu/d2l/le/content/2203784/viewContent/33224712/View?ou=2203784 6/13
1/12/2021 1101 Syllabus - Composition I Section W18 Spring Semester 2021 CO
As mandated by the University System of Georgia, the university requires the use of face masks in the
classroom and in KSU buildings to protect you, your classmates, and instructors. Per the University
System of Georgia, anyone not using a face covering when required will be asked to wear one or must
leave the area. Repeated refusal to comply with the requirement may result in discipline through the
applicable conduct code.
Reasonable accommodations may be made for those who are unable to wear a face covering for
documented health reasons. Please contact Student Disability Services at sds@kennesaw.edu for
student accommodation requests.
Shifting Modalities
Please note that the university reserves the right to shift teaching modalities at any time during the
semester, if health and safety guidelines require it to do so. Some teaching modalities that may be
used are F2F, Hyflex, Hybrid, or online, both synchronous and asynchronous instruction.
If you are ill, please stay home and contact your health professional. In that case, please email the
instructor to say you are missing class due to illness. Signs of illness include, but are not limited to, the
following:
Cough
Fever of 100.4 or higher
Runny nose or new sinus congestion
Shortness of breath or difficulty breathing
Chills
Sore Throat
New loss of taste and/or smell
Seating Plans
Students will sit in the same seat for every F2F class so that the instructor can use a seating plan for
contact tracing if a student contracts COVID-19.
Web Cameras
Schedule of Assignments
Read each week’s assigned text(s) before completing the corresponding D2L discussion board
assignment. There will be no discussion board posts assigned during peer review weeks (except for
week 16). It is the student’s responsibility to check D2L weekly and complete discussions by the
deadline posted in each thread.
Understanding Rhetoric: UR
https://kennesaw.view.usg.edu/d2l/le/content/2203784/viewContent/33224712/View?ou=2203784 7/13
1/12/2021 1101 Syllabus - Composition I Section W18 Spring Semester 2021 CO
Course Schedule
Section I
Week One
Read:
Week Two
Jan. 18-22
Introduction to Genre
Read:
(AOC) “Why Old Men Find Young Women’s Voices So Annoying,” pp. 131
Week Three
Jan. 25-29
Elements of an Argument
https://kennesaw.view.usg.edu/d2l/le/content/2203784/viewContent/33224712/View?ou=2203784 8/13
1/12/2021 1101 Syllabus - Composition I Section W18 Spring Semester 2021 CO
Read:
Week Four
Feb. 1-5
Peer Review
Section II
Week Five
Feb. 8-12
Rhetorical Structure
Read:
(AOC) “Everything You’ve Heard About Failing Schools is Wrong,” pp. 253
Week Six
Feb. 15-19
Rhetorical Appeals
Read:
Week Seven
Feb. 22-26
Rhetorical Analysis
Read:
Week Eight
Mar. 1-5
Peer Review
Section III
Week Nine
Mar. 15-19
https://kennesaw.view.usg.edu/d2l/le/content/2203784/viewContent/33224712/View?ou=2203784 10/13
1/12/2021 1101 Syllabus - Composition I Section W18 Spring Semester 2021 CO
Read:
Week Ten
Mar. 22-26
Research Methods
Read:
Week Eleven
Summarizing Texts
Read:
Week Twelve
Apr. 5-9
Research Proposal & Annotated Bibliography Due: SUN, Apr. 11, 11:59 PM
Peer Review
https://kennesaw.view.usg.edu/d2l/le/content/2203784/viewContent/33224712/View?ou=2203784 11/13
1/12/2021 1101 Syllabus - Composition I Section W18 Spring Semester 2021 CO
Section IV
Week Thirteen
Apr. 12-16
Read:
Week Fourteen
Apr. 19-23
Revision Strategies
Common Errors
Read:
Week Fifteen
Peer Review
https://kennesaw.view.usg.edu/d2l/le/content/2203784/viewContent/33224712/View?ou=2203784 13/13