You are on page 1of 1

1

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH


FA. No.218/2000
Indore: Dated:-04/05/2018:-

Parties through their counsel.


Learned counsel for the appellant does not want to press
IA Nos.1942/2018 and 1943/2018, as some of legal
representative are already on record, therefore, there is no
question of abatement and at any time other legal
representative can be brought on record, both the applications
are under Section 5 of Limitation Act for condonation of delay
and under Order XXII Rule 9 of the CPC for setting aside the
abatement of appeal.
Accordingly, IA Nos.1942/2018 and 1943/2018 are
dismissed as not pressed.
Heard on IA No.1941/2018, which is an application filed
under order XXII rule 3 of CPC for bringing the legal heirs of
appellant No.1 Fatima Bee on record.
Considering the reasons assigned in the application,
sufficient ground is made out to allowed this application.
Accordingly, IA No.1941/2018 is allowed.
Learned counsel for the appellant is directed to carry out
necessary amendments in the cause title.
List the matter for final hearing in due course.

(Virender Singh)
Judge
sourabh

Digitally signed by SOURABH YADAV


Date: 2018.05.08 11:21:09 +05'30'

You might also like