Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By
Urusha Kushatha
TU Registration No: 7-2-0927-0284-2015
Symbol No.: 9270099
Group: Account
Shwoyambhu International College
Submitted to
Bhaktapur, Nepal
May, 2019
DECLARATION
Signature:
Name of Student: Urusha Kushatha
Date: May, 2019
ii
SUPERVISOR’S RECOMMENDATION
Signature:
RAJU RAUT
SHWOYAMBHU INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE
Date: 2076-2-02
iii
ENDORSEMENT
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Signature:
Name of Student: Urusha Kushatha
Date: May, 2019
v
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title page i
Declaration ii
Supervisor's recommendation iii
Endorsement iv
Acknowledgement v
Table of content vi
List of tables vii
List of figures vii
Abbreviations viii
CHAPTER I:INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................1
1.1 Background of the Study..................................................................................................1
1.2 Profile of Organization/ Place/Events. Etc.......................................................................2
1.3 Statement of Problem.......................................................................................................5
1.4 Objectives of the Study....................................................................................................6
1.5 Rationale of the study.......................................................................................................6
1.6 Theoretical Framework....................................................................................................7
1.7 Definitions of variables....................................................................................................7
1.8 Statement of hypothesis..................................................................................................11
1.9 Limitation of the study...................................................................................................11
1.10 Literature Review.........................................................................................................11
1.11 Research gap.................................................................................................................12
1.12 Research Methodology.................................................................................................12
1.13 Chapter Plan.................................................................................................................14
1.14 Major Findings.............................................................................................................29
CHAPTER II:RESULTS AND ANALYSIS........................................................................15
2.1 Data Presentation and Analysis......................................................................................15
CHAPTER III:SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION............................................................30
3.1 Summary.........................................................................................................................30
3.2 Conclusion......................................................................................................................32
vi
BIBLIOGRAPHY..................................................................................................................33
Appendix.................................................................................................................................34
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2. 1 Liquid Ratio ..........................................................................................................16
Figure 2. 2 Current Ratio.........................................................................................................17
Figure 2. 3 Debt to Total Captal Ratio.....................................................................................18
Figure 2. 4 Debt to Equity Ratio .............................................................................................19
Figure 2. 5 Return on Shareholder’s Equity.............................................................................20
Figure 2. 6 Return on Capital Employed.................................................................................21
Figure 2. 7 Earnings Per Share.................................................................................................22
Figure 2. 8 Is Earnings Per Share distributed by BBBL satisfactory?.....................................23
Figure 2. 9 Is the bank transparent about its funds investment?..............................................24
Figure 2. 10 Are the staffs of the bank friendly?.....................................................................25
Figure 2. 11 How do you evaluate your relationship with bank?............................................26
Figure 2. 12 Is the interest rate on deposits adequate in current situation?.............................27
Figure 2. 13 Is the money collected invested in profitable sector?..........................................28
vii
ABBREVIATIONS
viii
1
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
Transparency in Operation
Professionalism in Management
Organizational Structure
Board of Directors
CEO
Chief Operation
Officer
2 Whether the solvency ratio of BBBL is able to pay its long term debts in time or
not?
Liquidity Ratio
Profitability Ratio
Liquidity Ratios
Liquid ratios show the short term solvency position of an entity. These ratios
ascertain whether an entity would be in a position to pay its short term debts in time
or not. The following ratios would help to judge short term solvency position of an
entity.
8
a) Current Ratio
This ratio is used to compute the relationship between current assets and current
liabilities. It shows the position of an entity to pay its current liabilities and ascertain
short term financial strengths and solvency position. The higher the ratio is taken as
margin of safety for trade creditors. This ratio is calculated as follows:
Current assets are those assets which can be converted into cash or cash equivalents
within short period of time, not exceeding one year. Current liabilities are those debts
which would be paid within short period of time, not exceeding one year. Current
ratio of 2:1 is considered as standard; however, higher ratio is preferable to maintain
better short term solvency position.
This ratio is used to compute the relationship between liquid assets and current
liabilities. It shows the position of an entity to pay its current liabilities out of liquid
assets.
Liquid assets are the current assets which can be converted into cash or cash
equivalents within more short time easily. All current assets are taken as liquid assets
except closing stock and prepaid expenses as they cannot be converted into cash
quickly at their value. Liquid ratio of 1:1 is considered as standard, but higher ratio is
taken as better to pay quick debts.
Solvency Ratios
Solvency ratios are also known as leverage ratios and capital structure ratios.
The ratios judge the long term solvency position of an entity. It means these ratios
show whether a company would be able to pay its long terms debts in time or not. The
following are the ratios to measures long term solvency position of a company.
9
This ratio is determined to establish the relationship between long term debts and
capital employed or total debts and capital employed. It shows the proportion of long
term fund that have been raised as loan and capital employed. It ascertains the ratio of
outsider's loan and shareholders' investment. It can be calculated as follows:
Total debts involve both long term debts and current liabilities or current debts.
Capital employed is also known by permanent capital or total capital. It is determined
by adding shareholders fund and long term debts.
The debt equity ratio is determined to establish the relationship between debts and
shareholder's equity. It shows the safety margin of long term creditors or lenders. It
also indicates the extent to which the company depends upon outsiders for its
functioning and existence. This ratio is calculated in the following ways:
The standard or ideal debt equity ratio is considered as 1:1, but in normal course of
business the acceptable debt equity ratio may be 2:1. However, higher debt equity
ratio is considered to be more risky.
Profitability Ratios
This ratio shows the relationship between net profit after tax and shareholders fund.
The purpose of this ratio is to ascertain the efficiency to utilize investment or
shareholders. The higher of this ratio means the more efficiency of the management to
mobilize the shareholders' investment. The following formula can be used to calculate
this ratio:
This ratio shows the relationship between net profit and permanent capital. The
purpose of this is to indicate return on shareholders' fund and long term debts after
deduction of interest and tax. It is calculated in percentage. This ratio can be
calculated by using the following formula:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and tax ÷ Capital Employed
Earning evaluation ratios, especially those under the Income and Market valuation
approaches, require that you estimate business earning power in order to determine
business value. There are a number of accounting ways to assess business income:
EPS measures the profit available the profit available for equity shareholders on the
basis of every share. The purpose of this ratio is to ascertain the amount of profit
available on every share. The elements of this ratio are net profit after tax, preference
dividend, and number of equity shares. This ratio can be calculated as under:
Earnings Per Share = Earnings available for equity ÷ No. of outstanding shares
In case, investment of preference shareholders are not in the company, EPS can be
calculated dividing net profit after tax by number of equity shares. High EPS is
11
objectives. They found that public sector banks are less profitable than private sector
banks. Foreign banks top the list in terms of net profitability. Private sector banks earn
higher non-interest income than public sector banks, because these banks offer more
and more fee based services to business houses or corporate sector. Thus there is
urgent need for public sector banks to provide such services to stand in competition
with private sector banks.
In the book “Financial Management” Pandey, I.M. (1997) has defined as “The
financial statement provides a summarized view of the financial operation of the firm.
Therefore, something can be learnt about a firm and careful examination of the
financial statements as invaluable documents or performance reports. Thus, the
analysis of financial statement is an important aid to financial analysis or ratio
analysis is main tool of financial statement analysis.”
Khan and Jain (1990) have defined “The ratio analysis is defined as the systematic
use of ratio to interpret the financial performance so that the strength and weakness of
firm as well as its historical performance and current financial condition can be
determined.”
describes the site selection, research design, population and sample, sources of data,
data collection procedure, techniques of analysis and limitation of the methodology.
1.12.1 Research Design
Research design is blue print of research, road map of research, strategy of research
which shows the overall plan of actions of the research. It is the specific method and
procedure, which guides the study and yields ways for doing research. The types of
research design are:- Exploratory Research Design, Causal comparative Research
Design, Experimental Research Design and Descriptive Research Design. Among
them this research paper uses a descriptive and analytical financial ratio analysis to
measure, describe and analyze the performance of BBBL of past five years.
1.12.2 Population and Sample
The population refers to the industries of the same nature and its services and
products in general. Thus, the total number of development bank constitutes the
population of data and the bank under study constitutes the sample for the study. So
from the population of 33 development banks operating in the country, Bhargav Bikas
Bank Limited has been selected as the sample bank for the study.
1.12.3 Nature and sources of data
For achieving the specific objective of the study data will be gathered entirely
from secondary source.
Secondary sources
Website of BBBL.
Annual reports, Brochures, manuals and publication of BBBL
Manual published by BBBL.
The financial data of past five years starting from F.Y 2070/71 to F.Y 2074/75 has
been used for this study. Most of the data are used in financial ratio analysis of bank.
The data was obtained from bank scope and the banks financial statements and
websites.
1.12.4 Methods of data presentation
The data collected from various sources will be presented with the help of
different tools such as pie chart, tabulation, bar-diagram which helps to describe
information at a glance.
14
CHAPTER II
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
Table 2. 1
Quick Assets and Current Liabilities
Liqud Ratio
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
2070/71 2071/72 2072/73 2073/74 2074/75
Figure 2.1 has represented the Quick ratio for different past five years from
FY 2070/71 to FY 2074/75. It is clear that QR has increased at the beginning years
and has been decreasing continuously. The QR is 0.4 that is maximum at FY 2072/73.
Liquid ratio of 1:1 is considered as standard, but higher ratio is taken as better to pay
quick debts.
17
Current Ratio
Table 2. 2
Current Assets and Current Liabilities
Current Ratio
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
2070/71 2071/72 2072/73 2073/74 2074/75
Figure 2.2 exhibit the current ratio of BBBL for the study period 2070/71 to
2074/75. The ratio is highest at FY 2072/73 where CR is 0.4 and continuously
decreasing to year 2074/75. So from this figure it can be said that the total assets of
BBBL is increasing at the beginning and decreasing at 2074/75. The higher ratio is
taken as margin of safety for trade creditors.
18
Debt to Total
Fiscal Year Total Debt Capital Employed
Capital Ratio
2070/71 1,033,137,890 143,131,770 7.22
2071/72 1,540,224,890 162,709,350 9.47
2072/73 1,962,067,110 316,597,230 6.20
2073/74 3,113,549,840 520,821,460 5.98
2074/75 3,262,821,250 624,177,910 5.23
(Source: Financial Report of BBBL, FY 2070/71 to FY 2074/75)
Table 2.3 shows the Debt to Total Capital Ratio of the fiscal years 2070/71
to 2074/75 of BBBL. The DTC Ratio of the fiscal year 2071/72 is 9.47 which is the
highest. The DTC Ratio of the fiscal year 2074/75 is 5.23 which is the lowest. The
ratio of 2070/71 is 7.22 and has been increased to 9.47 in 2071/72. The ratio of
2072/73 is 6.20 and has been decreased to 5.98 in 2073/74.
Figure 2. 3
Debt to Total Capital Ratio
Table 2. 4
Total Debt and Shareholder’s Equity
Debt to Equity
Fiscal Year Total Debt Shareholder’s Equity
Ratio
2070/71 1,033,137,890 143,131,770 7.218
2071/72 1,540,224,890 162,709,350 9.466
2072/73 1,962,067,110 316,597,230 6.197
2073/74 3,113,549,840 520,821,460 5.978
2074/75 3,262,821,250 624,177,910 5.227
(Source: Financial Report of BBBL, FY 2070/71 to FY 2074/75)
Table 2.4 shows the Debt to Equity Ratio of the fiscal years 2070/71 to
2074/75 of BBBL. The DE Ratio of the fiscal year 2071/72 is 9.466 which is the
highest. The DE Ratio of the fiscal year 2074/75 is 5.227 which is the lowest. The
D/E ratio of 2070/71 is 7.218 and has been increased to 9.466 in 2071/72. The D/E
ratio of 2073/74 is 6.197 and has been decreased to 5.978 in 2073/74.
Figure 2. 4
Debt to Equity Ratio
Figure 2.4 reflects the debt-equity ratio of financial statement of BBBL for
different past five years from FY 2070/71 to FY 2074/75. Here debt to equity ratio
was increased at second fiscal year. DE ratio was maintained at lower rates at FY
2072/73, 2073/74 and FY 2074/75 with their respective DE ratio 6.197, 5.978, 5.227.
However, higher debt equity ratio at FY 2071/72 is considered to be more risky.
2.1.3 Profitability Ratio
20
Return on Equity(%)
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
2070/71 2071/72 2072/73 2073/74 2074/75
Figure 2.5 indicates the diminishing trend of return on equity (ROE) of BBBL.
It is clear that ROE has been extended up to 21.64 in the FY 2070/71, 15.98 at FY
2071/72, 11.11 at FY 2072/73, 7.61 at 2073/74 and 5.31 at 2074/75. The higher ratio
at FY 2070/71 means the more efficiency of the management to mobilize the
shareholders' investment.
Return on Capital Employed
21
Table 2. 6
Net Profit after tax and Capital Employed
20.000
15.000
10.000
5.000
0.000
2070/71 2071/72 2072/73 2073/74 2074/75
Figure 2.6 reveals the return on capital employed (ROCE) of BBBL from FY
2071/72 to FY 2075/76. Here ROCE was gradually declining from initial fiscal year.
ROCE of 21.635% maintained at highest level that represents more efficient use of
capital. Thereafter in ROCE gradually in coming fiscal years that indicates BBBL is
not employing its capital effectively.
2.1.4 Earning Evaluation Ratio
22
Earnings
No. of Equity
Fiscal Year Available For Earnings Per Share (EPS)
Shares
Equity
2070/71 30,966,990 1,000,000 30.97
2071/72 25,856,300 1,200,000 21.55
2072/73 35,175,630 2,640,000 13.32
2073/74 39,625,210 4,084,294 9.70
2074/75 33,164,550 5,016,000 6.61
(Source: Financial Report of BBBL, FY 2070/71 to FY 2074/75)
Table 2.7 shows the Earnings per Share of the fiscal years 2070/71 to 2074/75
of BBBL. The EPS of 2070/71 is Rs. 30.97 which is the highest. The EPS of the fiscal
year 2074/75 is Rs. 6.61 which is the lowest. The EPS of 2071/72 is Rs. 21.55 and
decreased to Rs. 13.32 in 2073/74, Rs. 9.70 in 2075/74 and Rs. 6.61 in 2074/75. This
shows that the bank is not able enough to earn such profit which can increase the EPS.
Figure 2. 7
Earnings Per Share
Figure 2.7 represents the EPS of BBBL for past five years from FY 2070/71 to
FY 2074/75. Here EPS was similar at FY 2070/71 is Rs.30.97.After which the EPS is
continuously decreasing.
23
Table 2.8 depicts the results of the customers’ satisfaction regarding the EPS
distributed by the bank. Response has shown that 55% of among the total response is
not satisfied with the EPS distributed whereas 45% among total respondents are
satisfied.
Figure 2. 8
Satisfaction regarding Earnings Per Share
Result in %
Yes
45%
No
55%
Figure 2.8 shows the response of the customers regarding their satisfaction for
EPS distributed by the bank. Response has shown that 55% of among the total
response is not satisfied with the EPS distributed whereas 45% among total
respondents are satisfied.
24
Table 2. 9
Is the bank transparent about its funds investment?
Response Result in %
Yes 60
No 40
Table 2.9 depicts the results of the customers’ response regarding the
transparency of bank for the fund investment. Response has shown that 60% of
among the total respondents think that the bank is transparent regarding its fund
investment whereas the rest 40% is not positive regarding this matter.
Figure 2. 9
Response for bank transparency regarding funds investment
Result in %
No
40%
Yes
60%
Figure 2.9 depicts the results of the customers’ response regarding the
transparency of bank for the fund investment. Response has shown that 60% of
among the total respondents think that the bank is transparent regarding its fund
investment whereas the rest 40% is not positive regarding this matter.
25
Table 2. 10
Are the staffs of the bank friendly?
Response Result in %
Yes 35
No 65
Table 2.10 depicts the response of the customers regarding the friendly behavior
by the staffs of BBBL. The response is more negative than positive. 65% amongst the
respondents has not received friendly behavior and the rest 35% has received friendly
behavior.
Figure 2. 10
Result in %
Yes
35%
No
65%
Figure 2.10 depicts the response of the customers regarding the friendly
behavior by the staffs of BBBL. The response is more negative than positive. 65%
amongst the respondents has not received friendly behavior and the rest 35% has
received friendly behavior.
26
Table 2. 11
How do you evaluate your relationship with the bank?
Response Result in %
Excellent 10
Very Good 10
Good 30
Bad 50
Table 2.11 depicts the result regarding the relationship of the customers with
the bank. The response is more towards fair but excellent. 50% of the respondents
speak about their bad relationship with the bank. 30% of the respondents think that
their relationship is good while 10% of the respondents think their relationship with
the bank is very good and 10% think their relation is excellent.
Figure 2. 11
Customers’ Evaluation of their relationship with bank
Result in %
Excellent
10%
Very Good
10%
Bad
50%
Good
30%
Figure 2.11 depicts the result regarding the relationship of the customers with
the bank. The response is more towards fair but excellent. 50% of the respondents
speak about their bad relationship with the bank. 30% of the respondents think that
their relationship is good while 10% of the respondents think their relationship with
the bank is very good and 10% think their relation is excellent.
27
Table 2. 12
Is the interest rate on deposits adequate in current situation?
Response Result in %
Yes 40
No 60
Table 2.12 depicts the results regarding the satisfaction of the customers on
interest rate on deposits in current situation. 60% of the respondents are of thinking
that the current interest rate is not adequate whereas rest 40% thinks that the current
interest rate is reasonably adequate.
Figure 2. 12
Response towards adequacy of the interest rate of BBBL
Result in %
Yes
40%
No
60%
Figure 2.12 depicts the results regarding the satisfaction of the customers on
interest rate on deposits in current situation. 60% of the respondents are of thinking
that the current interest rate is not adequate whereas rest 40% thinks that the current
interest rate is reasonably adequate.
28
Table 2. 13
Is the collected money invested in profitable sector?
Response Result in %
Possibly 30
Probably 60
Table 2.13 depicts response of the customers regarding the utilization of the
money collected by the bank as deposits. 60% of the respondents think that the
collected money is probably invested in profitable sector and the rest 30% think that
the utilization of the funds collected might be possibly profitable.
Figure 2. 13
Utilization of funds in profitable sector
Result in %
Possibily
33%
Probably
67%
Figure 2.13 depicts response of the customers regarding the utilization of the
money collected by the bank as deposits. 60% of the respondents think that the
collected money is probably invested in profitable sector and the rest 30% think that
the utilization of the funds collected might be possibly profitable.
29
2. The company’s current ratio is at consistent level over the past five years.
3. Liquidity ratio of the firm is not in satisfactory condition which may affect the
debt payment ability of the company.
4. Net profits are fluctuating but increasing during the period of study, which
indicates that firm’s efficient operation of management.
CHAPTER III
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
This chapter is divided into three distinct parts. The first part is concerned he
with the summary of the whole study from the beginning to the end. The second part
deals with the conclusion where inferences and generalization were made or drawn
from findings and the analysis of the study formed the recommendation section which
brought the research to an end.
3.1 Summary
The study seeks to examine the factors that influence the financial
performance analysis of Bhargav Bikash Bank Limited. The study relating to
determinants of company’s liquidity, solvency, profitability, earning evaluation has
become an important issue for financial and economic researcher and scholars as
some of the company are found to be more liquid than other and the liquidity if found
to be controlled by some common factor.
The main objective is to assess the strengths and weakness of Bhargav
Bikash Bank Limited. It analyzes the contribution of Bhargav Bikash Bank Limited in
total revenue of government of Nepal as a rational tax payer of a nation.
The liquidity position of Bhargav Bikash Bank Limited is not favorable as the ratios
of the period in study are less than 1. Higher ratio is preferable to maintain better
short term solvency position. Liquid ratio of 1:1 is considered as standard.
The solvency position of Bhargav Bikash Bank Limited is satisfactory. The debt to
total capital ratio yields up to 5.23 at F.Y. 2074/75 which shows the proportion of
long term fund that have been raised as loan and capital employed. Bhargav Bikash
Bank Limited is able to pay its long term debts in time. Debt equity ratio is at
optimum level to 5.227 at F.Y. 2074/75 indicates how much debt a company is using
to finance its assets relative to the amount of value represented in shareholders
'equity.
The profitability position of Bhargav Bikash Bank Limited is adequate for survival of
the company and for expansion and diversification of business activities. Return on
shareholders' equity is highest at 21.64% in the FY 2070/71 means the more
31
For the analysis of data various financial ratios, average, graph and tables
were used to obtain a clear performance of the bank. A trend analysis was used to
forecasting the future trend of bank’s performance and correlation analysis was used
to investigation the relationship between different variable. The financial and
statistical analyses are summarized as below:
1. The study shows that the BBBL is experiencing a fluctuating scenario on
regards to the current ratio and liquid ratio.
2. Due to the fluctuations in liquid and current ratio, the liquidity position of
BBBL is not fairly good.
3. The study shows a moderate solvency position of BBBL as the Debt-Equity
ratio and Debt-Total Capital ratio is fluctuating.
4. The study shows that the bank is not consistent in regards to its profitability as
the Return on Shareholders’ Equity and the Return on Capital Employed is in
decreasing trend.
32
5. The study shows that the bank is not able enough to earn such profit which can
increase the EPS so the Earnings Evaluation Ratio is not good enough.
3.2 Conclusion
The financial condition through various financial ratio analysis made in this
report suggest a conclusion that Bhargav Bikash Bank Limited is fetching a
satisfactory financial condition for a healthy business prospect. Although some ratio is
not lying under the standard limit, they have considered as a satisfactory level. As a
whole, Bhargav Bikash Bank Limited has efficient financial environment with good
management.
1. Net profits are fluctuating but increasing during the period of study, which
indicates that firm’s efficient operation of management.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Adhikari, D.R&Pandey D.L.(2016); Business Research Methods, Kathmandu: Asmita
Publications.
Agarwal N.P. (1982), Financial Appraisal of State Ware-housing Corporations: A
Case Study of Rajasthan State Ware housing Corporation, Lokudyog, XVI.
Dangal and Kapoor (2010). Financial Performance of nationalized banks in India,
International Journal ISSN-2231-1009.
Fernando Ferreng (2012). How to create indices for bank branch financial
performance, ISBN-978-989-678-139-2 School of Management and
Technology, Portugal.
Gautam K.G & Gautam K.P (2017). Business Research Methods, Kathmandu: Januka
publications.
Appendix
Questionnaire
Dear sir/madam,
For the preparation of research report as per the course requirement of BBS 4 th year we
kindly request you to give response to my questionnaire by ticking the most suitable
option for you.
Name:
Age:
Profession:
Phone no:
1. Is the Earnings per Share distributed by BBBL satisfactory?
Yes
No
2. Is the bank transparent about its funds investment?
Yes
No
3. Are the staffs of the bank friendly?
Yes
No
4. How do you evaluate your relationship with bank?
Excellent
Very good
Good
Bad
5. Is the interest rate on deposits adequate in current situation?
Yes
No
6. Is the collected money invested in profitable sector?
Yes
No