Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Space weather events seen on the Sun occurred on 28 October. It was the third
largest detected since regular monitoring began approx-
imately 30 years ago and the largest since April 2001 (US
The period between late October and early November of Department of Commerce 2004). This activity was
2003 included a series of large solar events that resulted accompanied by a CME. CME’s are huge bubbles of
in some of the most extreme space weather of the plasma ejected from the Sun that speed into space. They
current solar cycle. Space weather has been defined as disrupt the flow of the solar wind and produce distur-
the conditions on the sun and in the solar wind, mag- bances that can strike the Earth with sometimes-cata-
netosphere, ionosphere, and thermosphere that can strophic results (http://science.nasa.gov/ssl/pad/solar/
influence the performance and reliability of space-borne cmes.htm). This particular CME was one of the fastest on
and ground-based technological systems. Adverse con- record in that it left the sun with a speed of 2,500 km/s,
ditions in the space environment can cause disruption five times the average speed (Murtagh 2004). Figure 1
of satellite operations, communications, navigation, and illustrates the observed active regions on 27 October to-
electric power distribution grids, leading to a variety of gether with the images of the solar flare and CME re-
socioeconomic losses (National Science Foundation corded on 28 October as observed by the SOHO
2000). spacecraft (http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/).
The space weather events of October–November 2003 These events resulted in a severe geomagnetic storm in the
were initiated by three very large sunspot clusters that Earth’s environment at 06:00 UT on 29 October. The dis-
became visible on the Sun over a period of approximately turbance levels on the Sun remained high for several days
7 days beginning on 18 October, 2003. One of these with a second powerful CME occurring at approximately
clusters, region 486, became the largest sunspot group of 21:00 UT on 29 October.
the current solar cycle and the largest seen since 1991. Figure 2 illustrates the planetary 3-h Kp indices for the
This sudden increase in sunspots induced a series of period of 29 October 2003 to 1 November 2003. The Kp
solar flares and coronal mass ejections (CMEs), index is derived from 13 global magnetic observatories.
(Department of Commerce 2004). Solar flares are explo- It is a measure of the disturbance level of the geomag-
sions on the surface of the Sun that produce a quick netic field by auroral ionospheric currents. Kp values
directed high-speed blast of charged particles and elec- greater than 4 represent disturbed conditions. As the Kp
tromagnetic energy. One of the largest solar flares ever values increase, the severity of the storm increases. Kp
values of 9 represent the most extreme disturbed con-
ditions and occur only a few times during the course of
each 11-year solar cycle (http://www.sec.noaa.gov/NO-
AAscales). Note that Kp values of 9 were reached mul-
Received: 2 July 2004 / Accepted: 10 July 2004 tiple times during 29–30 October in response to the
Published online: 14 August 2004 CME activity.
ª Springer-Verlag 2004
P. Doherty
Institute for Scientific Research, Space weather effects
Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Avenue,
Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA Space weather events, such as those described above, can
A.J. Coster (&) affect the performance of ground and space based tech-
MIT Haystack Observatory, Atmospheric Sciences, nological systems, with effects ranging from minor digital
Off Route 40, Westford, MA 01886, USA upsets, to severe power grid disruptions that can cause loss
E-mail: ajc@haystack.mit.edu
Tel.: +1-781-9815753 of service to millions. For GPS users, the impact of space
Fax: +1-781-9815766 weather can usually be characterized by disturbances in
URL: http://www.haystack.mit.edu/ajc the ionosphere. These in turn cause degradation in range
W. Murtagh measurements, and in severe circumstances, loss of lock
NOAA Space Environment Center, CO, USA by the receiver of the GPS signal.
Fig. 3
SED structure viewed by GPS TEC measurements
over North America together with L-band phase
scintillation recorded in Canada on 30 October
2003
Space weather effects on WAAS Kp·10. The x-axis represents time over the 3-month per-
iod and the y-axis represents the percent of the WAAS
The FAA’s WAAS system was commissioned for precision coverage area that had 95% availability. The drops in
approach (PA) services in July 2003, after a rigorous LNAV/VNAV and LPV coverage on 29 and 30 October
90-day testing period. That testing period, however, was indicate that there was no VNAV service in the entire
not as challenging as the severe geomagnetic storm activity WAAS coverage area for 15 and 11.3 h respectively. A
that tested WAAS PA performance in October and similar loss of coverage is observed on 20 November for a
November of 2003. much shorter period of time. These periods of reduced
There are basically two types of services currently sup- coverage are in direct association with the times when Kp
ported by WAAS, PA and non-precision approach (NPA). values were the highest.
The PA service levels of lateral navigation/vertical navi- Figure 5 shows the daily WAAS NPA coverage at the 99.9%
gation (LNAV/VNAV) and local approach with vertical availability in a format similar to Fig. 4. Note that NPA
guidance(LPV) use vertical guidance navigation that availability was not challenged during the extreme space
allows an aircraft to approach a runway with decision weather events that degraded availability for the PA service
heights as low as 250 ft. Vertical guidance navigation relies levels. The drops in NPA coverage shown on this plot on
heavily on the accuracy of the WAAS ionospheric cor- 10/2, 10/15, 11/20, 12/2,12/12,12/18 and 12/20 were in
rections. The NPA service level is based on horizontal response to Ground Uplink Switchovers (FAA/William H.
navigation, where the use of WAAS ionospheric correc- Hughes Technical Center 2004).
tions is not necessary. This type of service includes ter- Figures 4 and 5 illustrate the results of the space weather
minal, en route domestic and en route oceanic flight events on WAAS. PA services were interrupted but NPA
modes. services were continued throughout these challenging
Availability of the WAAS system is defined as the percent events. This is primarily due to the fact that PA services
of time the WAAS services are available over the coverage are dependent on the WAAS ionospheric correction grid
region. The current requirement is that PA service be and NPA services do not require these corrections. In
available ‡95% of the time over 75% of the CONUS. NPA general, the WAAS system performed as expected. It
requirements are that the service be available 99.9% of the detected the strong ionospheric spatial gradients and
time over the service volume. During the storm periods of responded by reducing system availability for VNAV ser-
October and November 2003, WAAS availability for PA vices.
service was degraded due to the rapid changes and strong
spatial gradients in the ionosphere as those observed in
Fig. 3 (Doherty 2004). Summary
Figure 4 summarizes the service area coverage at 95%
availability for the vertical navigation service levels of This paper provides an overview of some of the most in-
LNAV/VNAV and LPV for the period of October to tense space weather events and effects of the current Solar
December 2003. This figure also shows the Kp index Cycle. These events occurred in October and November
plotted in blue. For clarity, the Kp index is presented as 2003, 42 months after the peak of Cycle 23. Historically,
Fig. 4
Percent coverage of VNAV services at 95%
availability for the October–December 2003
period (FAA/William H. Hughes Technical Center
2004)
Fig. 5
Percent coverage of NPA service at 99.9%
availability for the October–December 2003
period (FAA/William H. Hughes Technical Center
2004)
the intensity of the geomagnetic storms of 29 and 30 Department of Commerce (2004) NOAA. Service assessment:
October were ranked as the sixth and 16th of the top 30 intense space weather storms, October 19–November 07, 2003,
geomagnetic storms. In response to these storms, tech- Maryland
Doherty PH (2004) Space weather effects on WAAS: a perfor-
nological systems were affected, satellites were lost or mance and status report. In: Presentation at space weather week,
service was disrupted, the Mars Odyssey MARIE instru- Boulder
ment was lost, a power grid in Sweden failed and some Evans JV (1970) June 1965 Magnetic storm: millstone hill
GPS systems located at the higher latitudes experienced observations. JATP 30:1629–1640
outages. SEDs and scintillation were apparent over the Evans JV (1973) The causes of storm time increases of the F-layer
North American continent. Ionospheric gradients resulted at mid-latitudes. JATP 35:593–616
in interruptions of WAAS precision approach services for FAA/William H. Hughes Technical Center (2004) NSTB/WAAS
T&E team. In: WAAS performance analysis, Report #7, Atlantic
15 h on the 29th of October and for 11.3 h on the 30th of City, 30 January
October. Foster JC (1993) Storm-time plasma transport at middle and high
latitudes. JGR 98:1675–1689
Murtagh W (2004) The Halloween storms: 19 October–7
November 2003. In: Presentation at space weather week, Boul-
References der
National Science Foundation (2000) The national space weather
Coster AJ, Foster JC, Erickson PJ (2003) Monitoring the Iono- program: the implementation plan, 2nd Edn. Washington FCM-
sphere with GPS. GPS World 14(5):42–49 P31-2000
Skone S, Coster A, Hoyle V, Laurin C (2003) WAAS availability Webb DF, Allen JH (2004) Spacecraft and ground anomalies
and performance at high latitudes. In: Proceedings of ION GPS/ related to the October–November 2003 solar activity. Space
GNSS Portland, 9–12 September, 2003 pp 1279–1287 Weather 2(3), DOI 10.1029/2004SW000075