Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OPTICS
FILES
Progressive Addition
Lenses
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION o oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 3
I
THE PROGRESSIVE ADDITION LENS CONCEPT
II
PHYSIOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN PROGRESSIVE LENS DESIGN
A Foveal vision
1) Accommodation, body and head postures and vertical eye movements ooooooo 10
2) Horizontal eye and head movements ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 11
3) Visual acuity ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 11
B Extra-foveal vision
1) Space and form perception ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 12
2) Perception of movement o oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 12
C Binocular vision
1) Corresponding retinal points ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 13
2) Similar images oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 13
III
DESIGNING PROGRESSIVE ADDITION LENSES
1
IV
DESCRIPTION AND CONTROL OF PROGRESSIVE LENS DESIGNS
SUPPLEMENT:
MATHEMATICAL DESCRIPTION OF PROGRESSIVE SURFACES
V
ENHANCING THE CHARACTERISTICS
OF FINISHED PROGRESSIVE LENSES
VI
THE EVOLUTION OF PROGRESSIVE ADDITION LENSES
2
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
Fig. 1: Progressive addition lens.
Since their introduction by Essilor in and that this segment of the presbyopia
1959, progressive addition lenses (PALs) correction market will continue to grow
have gained worldwide acceptance as the by about 10 percent a year.
most performant ophthalmic lenses for
the correction of presbyopia because Since more and more progressive
they provide comfortable vision at all practitioners systematically use PALs
distances. with most of their presbyopic patients,
many presbyopes already enjoy the
They successfully and advantageously benefits of progressive lenses, and many
replace single vision and bifocal lenses, more will do so in the future.
presbyopic corrections that do not offer
such an advantage. This volume of The Essilor Ophthalmic
Optics Files series reviews the basic
Experts project that, worldwide, about physiological and technical concepts
22 percent of all presbyopes will be behind progressive addition lenses.
fitted with progressive lenses by 1994
3
I THE
PROGRESSIVE ADDITION
LENS CONCEPT
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo a ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
I 4
THE
PROGRESSIVE ADDITION
LENS CONCEPT
Fig. 3
o n
m o d a t i
o m
o f a c c
e
r a n g D I S TA N C E
.33 .50 1 2 5 m
∞
13 20 40 80 200 in
d
.50
=1
i)
ax
AT E
EDI
c.
(m
Ac ER
M
INT
ra
n
N E A R
g
e
o
f
a
d
cc
00
o
0.
m
=
c.
m
o
A c
d
a
ti
o
n
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo a ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
on
mo dati
a ccom 0d
e of
rang
Acc. = 0.0
d
Acc. = 1.50
(maxi)
D I S TA N C E
.33 .50 1 2 5 m
∞
13 20 40 80 200 in
0d
1.5
TE
DIA
i)
.=
ax
c E
Ac RM
m
( E
INT
ra
N E A R
ng
d
e
0
of
0.0
ac
.=
co
cc
m
A
m
od
at
io
n
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo b ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
5
THE
PROGRESSIVE ADDITION
LENS CONCEPT
Fig. 2 (contd.)
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo c ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Fig. 2 (contd.):
c) Trifocal.
d) Progressive.
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo d ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Fig. 3 (contd.):
c) Trifocal (2.00D add).
d) Progressive (2.00D add).
6
THE
PROGRESSIVE ADDITION
LENS CONCEPT
Fig. 3 (contd.)
n
od atio
cc omm
.00 d
g e of a
ran
Acc. = 0
d
Acc. = 1.50
(maxi)
D I S TA N C E
.33 .50 1 2 5 m
∞
13 20 40 80 200 in
d
= 1.50
d
i)
.50
TE
( max
DIA
=1
Acc.
)
. E
a xi
cc RM
0d
A E
INT
(m
= 0.0
ra
N E A R
ng
Acc.
e
of
ac
co
0d
m
0.0
m
=
c.
od
Ac
at
io
n
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo c ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
on
mo dati
a ccom
e of
rang
D I S TA N C E
.33 .50 1 2 5 m
∞
13 20 40 80 200 in
axi)
d (m
1.50
Acc. =
TE
E DIA
E RM
INT
ra
N E A R
ng
e
of
ac
0d
0 .0
co
.=
A cc
m
m
od
at
io
n
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo d ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
7
THE
PROGRESSIVE ADDITION
LENS CONCEPT
B Advantages of Progressive
Addition Lenses:
1) Continuous Progressive addition lenses offer
field of clear a continuous field of clear vision
vision: from distance to near. Single
vision reading lenses offer a field
of clear vision limited to the near area only, while
the abrupt change of power in a bifocal creates
completely divided fields for distance and near
vision (Fig. 3).
8
THE
PROGRESSIVE ADDITION
LENS CONCEPT
9
II PHYSIOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS
IN PROGRESSIVE
LENS DESIGN
PHYSIOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN PROGRESSIVE LENS DESIGN
Fig. 5
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.250
1.5 5
1.7 0
2.0 0
0
2. 00
2. 00
2.
2. .00
00
2
II 10
PHYSIOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS
IN PROGRESSIVE
LENS DESIGN
11
PHYSIOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS
IN PROGRESSIVE
LENS DESIGN
Fig. 7
12
PHYSIOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS
IN PROGRESSIVE
LENS DESIGN
Fig. 8
13
III DESIGNING
PROGRESSIVE ADDITION
LENSES
A Modern conception of
ophthalmic lens design:
1) The ophthalmic An ophthalmic lens is an
lens as an optical optical system designed to
system: form images of objects on
the far point sphere of the
DESIGNING PROGRESSIVE ADDITION LENSES
Fig. 9
far-point sphere
III 14
DESIGNING
PROGRESSIVE ADDITION
LENSES
Fig. 10
STOP (w')
Q' w'
Fig. 11
MERIT
FUNCTION
contour plot
of the initial lens to be optimized
optimization software
contour plot
of the optimized lens
15
DESIGNING
PROGRESSIVE ADDITION
LENSES
2) “Optimization” Lens designers cannot The overall performance of the lens is then
software and create optimized optical evaluated by the weighted sum of the found
“Merit Function”: systems in a single step. Merit Function values according to the following
Instead, most designers formula:
employ an iterative process using an i =m j =n
Fig. 12
4
image spot 0
-2
-4
-4 0 4
3
object point -3 0
0
3
profile of the wave front
which makes the image
16
DESIGNING
PROGRESSIVE ADDITION
LENSES
B Designing progressive
addition lenses:
1) Specific optical The optical characteristics
requirements of a progressive lens are
of a PAL: defined by the visual
physiology and postural
behavior of the wearers, as determined by
clinical experiments. They can be divided into
two categories:
Fig. 13
17
DESIGNING
PROGRESSIVE ADDITION
LENSES
– Vertical location of the near vision area: – Horizontal (lateral) location of the near vision
physiological considerations, such as strain of area (meridian): once the power profile has been
extra-ocular muscles or limited range of defined, its lateral positioning on the lens must
binocular fusion with downward gaze, favor a be adapted to the natural convergence of the
high position of the near vision area in the lens. eyes and the value of the addition. Since, the
Unfortunately, a short progression usually results more advanced the presbyopia, the closer the
in rapidly varying peripheral aberrations. Lens reading distance, the meridional line must be
designers redress this conflict. A good shifted nasally as the addition increases.
compromise consists in locating the usable near
vision at a downward gaze position of about
25 degrees.
Fig. 14
distance vision
intermediate vision
near vision
0 2.5 diopters
18
DESIGNING
PROGRESSIVE ADDITION
LENSES
19
IV DESCRIPTION AND CONTROL
OF PROGRESSIVE
LENS DESIGNS
DESCRIPTION AND CONTROL OF PROGRESSIVE LENS DESIGNS
40
Lens designers use different methods to
30
graphically represent the optical characteristics
20
of progressive lenses, in particular:
10
1) Power The curve represents the power Power (Diopter)
profile: progression of the lens along its
-1 0 1 2 3 4
(Fig. 15) meridional line from distance to near
-10
vision. This power progression is a
result of a continuous shortening of the radius of
-20
curvature of the front surface.
-30
-40
2) Contour This is a two dimensional map of Fig. 16
plot: the lens representing either the BETA in degrees
distribution of power (Fig. 16) or of -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50
astigmatism (Fig. 17). The map shows lines of
-10 -20 -30 -40 -50
2.
50
0
0
50 40 30 20 10
50 40 30 20 10
3.00
50
3.
4.
00
0
4.5
Fig. 17
BETA in degrees
-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50
0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
50 40 30 20 10
50 40 30 20 10
2.50
IV 20
DESCRIPTION AND CONTROL
OF PROGRESSIVE
LENS DESIGNS
Power in Diopters
Fig. 18 2
-10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60
-2
-4
30
es 0
-6
gre 2
-30
in 10
-20
de
ha 0
-10
Bet
Alp 0
0
-1
-70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 a in
deg 10
0
10
ree
-2
s 20
30
20
30
Fig. 20
40
50
60
70
80
6
90
4
Astigmatism in Diopters
-20
de
ha 0
-10
gradients of power variation (Fig. 21), etc...
0
Bet 0
-1
Alp
a in
These three-dimensional plots are more deg 10
0
ree
-2
s 20
contour-plots.
Fig. 21
Plot interpretation:
-30
10
-20
mm
0
0
-1
X in
Fig. 20: 3D astigmatism plot of PAL (2.50D add). mm 10
0
-2
20
30
Fig. 21: 3D power gradients plot of PAL(2.50D add).
21
DESCRIPTION AND CONTROL
OF PROGRESSIVE
LENS DESIGNS
Fig. 22
22
SUPPLEMENT
MATHEMATICAL DESCRIPTION
OF PROGRESSIVE SURFACES
23
SUPPLEMENT
MATHEMATICAL DESCRIPTION
OF PROGRESSIVE SURFACES
C Mathematical modelization
of surfaces with B. splines
polynomial functions:
Any bi-regular surface can be represented by a
set of numerous ordinates evenly distributed on
the surface according to a regular reference grid.
The local characteristics of the surface at an x, y
coordinate point, z=f (x,y), p, q, r, s, t, are
deduced from the values of the discrete
ordinates in the vicinity of this point by their
linear combination on a squared matrix. These
characteristics are calculated according to the
following formulae:
z = ∑ λ i, j . ai, j
i, j
df
p= = ∑ wi,x j . (ai +1, j − ai, j )
dx i, j
df
q= = ∑ wi,y j . (ai, j +1 − ai, j )
dy i, j
d2 f
r= = ∑ wi,xxj . (ai + 2, j − 2. ai +1, j + ai, j )
dx 2 i, j
d2 f
s= = ∑ wi,xyj . (ai +1, j +1 − ai +1, j + ai, j − ai, j +1 )
dxdy i, j
d2 f
t= 2
= ∑ wi,yyj . (ai, j + 2 − 2. ai, j +1 + ai, j )
dy i, j
24
SUPPLEMENT
MATHEMATICAL DESCRIPTION
OF PROGRESSIVE SURFACES
z
normal vector
y
C2 P
x
O
C1
tangent plane in O
principal sections
whose main curvatures arc C1 and C2
Fig. B Fig. C
a i,j
1.5
1
0.5
0
- 0.
5
-1
- 1.
5
Z
-2
- 2.
Z
5
-3
- 3.
-4
5
Y X
- 4.5
40
-5
30
20
-40
10
-30
0
/1
-20
Xi
0
m
-10
m
0
Yj
-1
X m 0
Y
0
-2
m/ 10
10
0
20
-3
30
0
mesh
-4
40
25
V ENHANCING THE CHARACTERISTICS
OF FINISHED PROGRESSIVE
LENSES
ENHANCING THE CHARACTERISTICS OF FINISHED PROGRESSIVE LENSES
Fig. 23
a b
V 26
ENHANCING THE CHARACTERISTICS
OF FINISHED PROGRESSIVE
LENSES
Fig. 24
27
VI THE EVOLUTION OF
PROGRESSIVE ADDITION
LENSES
The very first progressive lens - introduced by vision, V2 also took into account the importance
Essilor under the name of Varilux 1 (1959) - had of extra-foveal and dynamic vision thanks to the
a basic design linking two large and spherical new concept of “horizontal optical modulation”.
distance and near vision zones. In designing the Binocular vision was optimized as a result of an
THE EVOLUTION OF PROGRESSIVE ADDITION LENSES
lens, more attention was paid to distance and asymmetric design.The overall design of the lens
near vision rather than peripheral vision. is represented by a succession of conic sections
The second generation of progressive lenses was (Fig. 26).
introduced as Varilux 2 the “physiological”
progressive addition lens (1972). While providing Fig. 25: The “First” progressive addition lens.
large distance, intermediate and near fields of Fig. 26: The “Physiological” progressive addition lens.
Fig. 25
CIRCLES
LINK
CIRCLES
Fig. 26
ELLIPSES
CIRCLE
PARABOLAS
HYPERBOLAS
VI 28
THE EVOLUTION OF
PROGRESSIVE ADDITION
LENSES
During the decade following the introduction of A further step in the enhancement of progressive
Varilux 2, other manufacturers developed lens performance was the introduction of the
alternative progressive lens designs focusing on Multi-Design concept with the Varilux Multi-
specific optical characteristics. Some Design / Varilux Infinity lens (1988). This lens
emphazised large near and distance vision zones, used distinct designs to match the wearer’s
while concentrating unwanted astigmatism in the changing needs as presbyopia advances. Multi-
lens periphery (American Optical Ultravue, design concept aims at optimizing visual comfort
Rodenstock Progressiv R, Silor SuperNoLine, for each stage of presbyopia and making
Sola VIP). Others took the opposite approach, changes of addition easier for the wearer. The
reducing the amount of unwanted astigmatism in “Multi-Design” concept is well illustrated with the
the periphery by spreading it more widely in the change of power progression profile by addition
lens (American Optical Truvision Omni). Still (Fig. 27).
others placed special emphasis on the concept
of lens asymmetry and comfortable binocular
vision (Zeiss Gradal HS).
Fig. 27
Distance vision
power increase
Intermediate vision
Near vision
Height
29
THE EVOLUTION OF
PROGRESSIVE ADDITION
LENSES
The latest generation of progressive lenses, These advantages are a result of Varilux Comfort’s
introduced under the name of Varilux Comfort specific power progression profile (Fig. 30) : for a
(1993), offers wearers more “natural vision” than 2.00 D add, 85% of the addition is reached
any previous progressive lens. 12mm below the distance fitting cross, compared
to a minimum of 14 to 15mm for a classical
Comfortable Varilux Comfort’s near vision progressive.
posture area is located high in the lens
in near vision: so that the wearer can reach it
easily and naturally on
downward gaze (Fig. 28). To explore the near and
intermediate vision fields, fewer head and eye
movements are required and the wearer enjoys
Fig. 28: Comparative head and eye posture: Varilux Comfort,
more comfortable posture (Fig. 29). Classical Progressive and “non presbyope”.
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
10° 5°
45° 30° 35°
30
THE EVOLUTION OF
PROGRESSIVE ADDITION
LENSES
True comfort Varilux Comfort offers the wearer Binocular comfort Moreover, Varilux Comfort
in peripheral larger fields of clear vision as well and multi-design: offers perfectly balanced
and dynamic as additional comfort in binocular vision thanks to
vision: peripheral and dynamic vision. its asymmetry, and also integrates the multi-
This is due to the softness of the design concept of previous Varilux generation
lens periphery, which greatly reduces horizontal lenses which have been retained and improved.
head movements necessary to explore the full
width of the field (Fig. 31). Furthermore, there is
a dramatic reduction of all “swim effects” to
greatly improve wearer comfort in dynamic
vision.
Fig. 30: Power profile of Varilux Comfort add 2.00.
Fig. 30
DISTANCE +4
85% 100% add
0
INTERMEDIATE
NEAR -8
-14
-20
( add 2.00 )
Fig. 31
31
CONCLUSION
Latest advances in progressive lens technology have further
improved patient satisfaction.
Progressive lenses will continue to develop ensuring success
to eye-care practitioners and visual comfort to an ever-
increasing number of their presbyopic patients.
32
ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL - R.C.PARIS B 712 049 618.